The document provides guidance on when and how to redesign a website. It advises that redesigns often fail when they are not based on user research and facts, involve just visual changes without improving the user experience, or are part of a traditional redesign cycle. The key steps outlined are: 1) Conduct user research to understand user needs and problems; 2) Develop a strategy and roadmap based on the research; 3) Create prototypes and test designs iteratively with users. Continuous improvement based on data and user feedback is emphasized over periodic large redesigns. User research methods like analytics, surveys, testing are recommended to inform decisions.
14. Summary
3 reasons why redesigns fail
• Not based on user research and facts
• When the redesign is just a re-design
• Part of a traditional redesign cycle @agconsult
31. Part 4
How can you help your clients to make
a website that doesn't #fail?
32. Our approach to CRO
Analyze data to
find problem areas
User research to find
out why it’s a problem
Find a solution
& implement/test
Measure
& refine
33. Our approach to IA
User research Strategy Structure Mock-ups
42. Yes, Steve Jobs really said this. And he's right.
But the conclusion that Apple doesn't do user research is wrong.
Apple doesn't believe in market research.
It does a lot of user research.
@agconsult
43. Pay attention to what users do, not what they say.
That's what user research is about.
@agconsult
44. My favorite user research methods
Google Analytics User behaviour User testing Surveys
45. Some of my favorite questions
• On the website
• What is the purpose of your visit to our website today?
• What's holding you back from completing your purchase today?
• What’s keeping you from buying this (product name) right now?
• Do you have any questions that remain unanswered? Yes/ no…
• What convinced you the most to decide to ask a quote?
• Was there something that nearly stopped you from buying from us? Yes / no …
• Existing clients
• What would you miss most if your X broke down / if we took away X
• What do you like the most about X?
• What's the most important thing X helped you to achieve?
46.
47.
48. no destination in mind
43%
time frame in mind
51%
78%
no fixed dates
type of vacation (sun, culture,…)
84%
49.
50. What convinced you the most to decide to ask a
quote?
Was there something that made you hesitate?
If so, what?
77,1% more requests for quote
51. Stop selling the way you want to sell
Sell the way people want to buy
Karl Gilis - @agconsult
54. ... you need to use the most important tool you have
55. 2. Strategy & Roadmap
• What should be on the website?
• What shouldn’t be?
• Role of the web site as a
• Marketing & communication tool
• Business tool
• How to get there (without big
bangs if possible)
Strategy Roadmap
56. 3. From idea to final prototype
Structure Mock-ups Lots of user testing Maybe some AB-testing
74. Get my free ebook now
10 conversion tips that work on every website
15 cases from the real world
6 best practices from leading websites
www.agconsult.com/ebook.html
www.slideshare.net/agconsult
Already more than 6.865 downloads
No, Although we as optimizers tend to hate/laugh with redesigns.
Up comes the story of Marks & Spencer.
The main problem was they didn't do user research; the site wasn’t customer centric.
The problem wasn't the redesign as such, but the lack of research. And then you're gambling
But that's also the case with cro- and ab-tetsing. When it's not based on research & facts, you're gambling. And disappointment and failure will be yours.
This will never have an impact. Because it's just decoration. And the main problem with most websites is not the design but the structure & content. Story of the sour milk. Compare to buidling a house: painting your walls will not prevent your house from falling apart / is not a real restauration: you’re covering up the problem, but it will not solve it -
Traditional redesign cycle probably is shit. Because it's mainly just about refurbishing things. Not giving an answer to real business needs. You don't need something completely new every 3 to 4 years. Most of our IA clients only do a thorough renewal after 10 to 15 years.
But sometimes websites just suck donkey balls. And a new website is a must.
But sometimes websites just suck donkey balls. And a new website is a must.
Making a shitty website just a bit less shitty: that's not our goal, is it?
And of course: if a website suck donkey balls, there will be quick wins. But you will hit the local maximum sooner rather than later.
Average life span of a website without major overhaul (our clients : 10 to 15 year, 2 of our main clients are still building upon the website concept we made for them in 2003. Sometimes they change/upate design, they change the technical foundation and they work on content, & structure all the time.
continuous improvement
+4 keer meer inschrijvingen op nieuwsbrieven
Succesvolle release van PitStop Pro v13
X abonnementen verkocht in de eerste x weken/maanden
By making the site more about what users want.
The effect of these changes. The bounce-rate was cut in half. And we got 35% more sales.
Het effect van die veranderingen? Onze bounce-rate werd gehalveerd.
GA: most visited, less visited, bounce rates (adjusted), segmentation User behaviour: scroll & click heatmaps, user sessions recordings, in-page analytics (google analutycs for chrome)
Dit is mijn favoriet!!!
This is not a mock-up or wireframe. This is bullshit.
Average life span of a website without major overhaul (our clients : 10 to 15 year, 2 of our main clients are still building upon the website concept we made for them in 2003. Sometimes they change/upate design, they change the technical foundation and they work on content, & structure all the time.
continuous improvement