Amman think green

1-Sustainability : quality of life
2-urgency to analise, monitor and control urban sprawl > distribution of agriculture/cityculture
3-Density: Distribution of mass/capacity + void/space on different levels
4-laws of density: the dynamics of footprintmanagement and stacking
5-Low rise high density: a promising option for cities
6 atractive cities: distribution and proximity of qualities

1.Urgency - analysis 2 solutions capacity +capacitysolutions qualitysolutions quality + diversity
1. Urgency - analysis 2 solutions scale 3. + scale 3. + diversity

In order to get wealthier cities in à healthy world we have to
Reduce fossil consumption, reduce transport and reduce corruption
Improve work/living by water- better food + control of waste


Improve work and living by
communication+ culture and intelligence/knowledge


Sustainability is since Al Gore related to
climatechange CO2 and especially to (fossil)
energy.
Water, food, space, biodiversity are at least
as important > “ Preventing entropy”.


Energy in fact , in the sunny Middle East
and Africa is not the problem.
There is plenty solarenergy for energy
and even for cooling. ?
Water is the problem!

Needed surface
of sun
Drying Cooling powerfields

with with the
the sun
sun context energy_ water

harvesting water by PV powered chiller ?

1. Urgency - analysis 2 solutions capacity + scale 3. solutions quality + diversity

1. Urgency - analysis 2 solutions capacity + scale 3. solutions quality + diversity Waterbox Groasis

Growth of inhabitants Amman:

2010: 2.800.000
1924: 2000 >2040: 14.000.000
1945: 50.000

Amman is a city that developped in no time from a nomad settlement at the
edge of an fertile area to a metropolitain city attempting more and more an
agraricultural and ecological important landscape.


Example of the embassee

West Amman : getting stoned

lung

obesitas
Growth of Leiden Growth of Leiden
anno 1900: 3% build up area anno 2005: 30% build up area

Development needed space in the Netherlands 1900-2000

Factor 3: three times as much inhabitants

Factor 2: average of people pro dwelling is half as much

Factor 2: the average dwelling twice as big

Factor 12: 3x 2x 2 three times as much inhabitants live
with half as much inhabitants in dwellings that are twice as big

And the space around the dwelling has doubled > Factor 24

Knowledge and the modern paradigm

Distribution of space and mass

“if the wonder of density is in function the city is full of space.”


From plot to region each level has its own Fsi

GSI = GSI = GSI = GSI =
1.0 0.50 0.75 0.12 GSI = GSI = GSI = GSI = GSI =
L=1 L=2 L = 1.33 L=8 0.25 L 0.50 L 0.50 L 0.75 L 0.12 L
FSI = FSI =
=4 =2 =2 = 1.33 =8
1.0 1.0

Variating buildup percentages and stackings with similar FSi

0,45*4=1,8/15=12% 2*4 op 3*5 8/15=53%


Bij het toevoegen van een verdieping aan een blok met
een diepte van 10 meter verdubbelt de FSI bijna.
immers de verdubbeling van de straatbreedte vergroot
het terrein > verlaagt de GSI en reduceert daarmee de
FSI met ca 20%


Angle of light and penetration into volume


strategies for spatial optimalisation and densifying

level planarea level buildingblock niveau woning

Submitted ground Submitted ground Optimizing profile Loss on level plots FSi lots Fsi lots
for grid in lots inside block urban plan + mass Lotsize dwellingsize

50% 85%


Densityrange in Fsi plot and dwellingtypes

groundbounded Hybrids Hybrids stacked Hybrids appartements
Groudrelated stacked+

light
Small house 1,2 1,3 1,4 1,7 2
and/or big
lot 3floors 3floors 4floors 4floors 5floors
40% 43% 35% 43% 40%

Dense

4floors 4floors 4floors 4floors 6floors
40% 50% 57% 60% 60%
Big house 2,3 2,5 3,5
1,6 2
and/or
small lots

Dwellinglibrary - milieus

groundbounded grondgebounded - stacked appartements

grondbounded - flexible groundrelated - stacked Grondaccesible-app

1,2 1,3 1,4 2

3verd 40% 3verd 43% 4verd 35% 4verd 43% 5verd 40%

FSI +

Space occupancy -

4verd 40% 4verd 50% 4verd 57% 4verd 60% 6verd 60%

2 2,3 2,5 3,5
dwellingtypes 1,6

Dwellinglibrary – living quality



FSI +

Space occupancy -

dwellingtypes

Dwellinglibrary - outdoorspace



FSI +

Space occupancy -

dwellingtypes

Streetcity Gardencity Parkcity
Borneo island amsterdam Minimal public park/green Maximum public park/green


The making off 100dwellings/ha

10x 7x1 7x1
10 1m 1m
m


Borneo: 6 dwellings pro 9,60 (1,6m/dwelling)
>>>>>>>>7woningen op 8,40 (1,2) > 133%
Ca 140 dwellings net /ha


5

4

3

2
6 7


1
1

2

3 4 3
4 5 5

6 7

6 7

1. Urgency - analysis 2 solutions capacity + scale 45*4,2m
3. solutions quality + diversity

Bongerd: 75 dwellings pro acre Fsiweefsel= 1

NB 3-kap is onderverdeeld in met/zonder drive-in! (WIJZIGING)

Bongerd - WONINGDIFFERENTIATIE - d.d. 27 september 2002
TOETSING GRONDBESLAG EN WONINGAANTAL PER WOONGEBIED
WOONGEBIED 1-kap 2-kap 3-kap-1 3-kap-2 4-VS 6-VS 6-VS-cp 6-SH 7-VS 8-VS 8-SH StV-vs StV-sh TUIN PT diversen w oningen grondbeslag

Woongebied A 3 50 33 9 72 42 18 36 0 0 80 60 0 3 4 0 403 43355
% totaal/type 19% 36% 73% 9% 27% 41% 50% 21% #DEEL/0! 0% 29% 14% 0% 27% 27%

Woongebied G 4 12 3 3 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 30 4812
% totaal/type 25% 9% 7% 3% 3% 0% 0% 0% #DEEL/0! 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 13%

Woongebied B 1 18 3 15 56 18 6 30 0 8 40 23 0 2 3 0 218 27837
% totaal/type 6% 13% 7% 15% 21% 18% 17% 17% #DEEL/0! 25% 15% 6% 0% 18% 20%

Woongebied C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 25 0 0 0 0 25 1500
% totaal/type 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% #DEEL/0! 0% 0% 6% 0% 0% 0%

Woongebied D 4 36 6 33 84 24 12 60 0 16 72 79 0 3 2 0 426 42769
% totaal/type 25% 26% 13% 33% 32% 24% 33% 34% #DEEL/0! 50% 26% 19% 0% 27% 13%

Woongebied E 1 10 0 15 12 0 0 18 0 0 32 71 21 1 1 0 180 14395
% totaal/type 6% 7% 0% 15% 5% 0% 0% 10% #DEEL/0! 0% 12% 17% 100% 9% 7%

Woongebied F 3 14 0 24 32 18 0 30 0 8 48 159 0 2 3 0 336 28550
% totaal/type 19% 10% 0% 24% 12% 18% 0% 17% #DEEL/0! 25% 18% 38% 0% 18% 20%

TOTAAL 1-kap 2-kap 3-kap-1 3-kap-2 4-VS 6-VS 6-VS-cp 6-SH 7-VS 8-VS 8-SH StV-vs StV-sh TUIN PT diversen w oningen grondbeslag

Ruimtebeslag 210 330 420 420 470 560 560 520 600 610 570 60 50 225 360 163218
Aantal blok k en 16 70 15 33 66 17 6 29 0 4 34 417 21 11 15
Aantal woningen 16 140 45 99 264 102 36 174 0 32 272 417 21 1618 woninge
3360 23100 6300 13860 31020 9520 3360 15080 0 2440 19380 25020 1050 2475 5400 7546

Sociale huur 0 0 0 0 0 0 174 0 0 272 0 21 467 28,86%

Vrije sector 16 140 99 264 102 36 0 0 32 0 417 0 1106 68,36%

Straatparkeren PT straat w ig bezoek TOTAAL excl.PT Prive-parkeren 1135 Parkeergarages

Aanbod 176 250 34 162 622 446 Erf 831 0,51 pp/w o Ensembles
Vraag 176 272 162 610 434 Drive-in 222 0,14 pp/w o P-7 voor 7-k ap
NB Het aanbod overtreft de vraag: MARGE! Carport 82 0,05 pp/w o P-7 voor anderen

Woningtype 1-kap 2-kap 3-kap 3-kap 4-kap 6-kap 6-cp 6-kap 7-kap 8-kap 8-kap stadsvillastadsvilla Tuin
en ruimtebeslag* 210 330 420 420 470 560 560 520 600 610 570 60 50 225 360
Ruimtebeslag is indicatief 200 320 420 420 465 560 560 510 585 610 570 60 46 200 6260
WOONGEBIED A 1-kap 2-kap 3-kap-1 3-kap-2 4-VS 6-VS 6-VS-cp 6-SH 7-VS 8-VS 8-SH StV-vs StV-sh TUIN PT extra w oningen grondbeslag

A1 0 1 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 60 0 0 1 82 6260
A2 (tuin) 1 4 2 0 3 1 0 1 0 0 2 0 0 1 0 55 6225


1. Urgency - analysis 2 solutions capacity + scale 3. solutions quality + diversity De Bongerd, Amsterdam

Veltmanstraat 120app > 162 dwellings with 70 lowrise! +92 appartments 135%


92 appartments 70 lowrise!

Veltmanstraat 135%

voorbeelden

92 appartments 70 lowrise!

Veltmanstraat 120app > 162 dwellings with 70 lowrise! 92 appartments 135%


v


The paradox of the city is: diversity and density of
qualities results in space in the form of chances.


The urgency of an enduringing attractive city to make people
become happier sand to gain a public landscape is evident.

economic, social and cultural changes that have the city as an engine of these
changes, Increasingly drive cities an attractive and sustainable alternative to the
massively overgrown suburban 'landscape'

Because of earth, prosperity, welfare and environmental wealth intensifying the
quality of our cities is desirable.


Is the attractivity of a city based
on economiy and efficiency?


Urban attractiveness is based on diversity, which leads to
interaction between different identities and possibilities to
reflect oneself give to others and their choices.


Proximity makes the essence of a city
Space for individuals and the public


The paradox of the city is: diversity en density of
qualities results in space in the form of chances.


Plenty of people wish to live in healthy cities, and they are
willing to spend a lot to reach that. Up to the moment that
we dont offer them much!


The city is an eminent cultural product, an accumulation of
human capital and energy, in euros but mainly in experiences,
stories, ideas, relationships, services and goods, memories and
aspirations: past and future

1-Sustainability : quality of life
As an architect, I am interested in quality of life by quality of space
As a civilian or urban nomad
I wish cities to be healthy places with a wealth of food and knowledge (without corruption) so chances to devellop yourself as a
fellowcivillian in coexperience with other people
Collective freedom, integrity and equality
That’s why I, as an architect, hope to contribute to cities full of space
That’s why I believe in sustainability
That’s why I think that food, and doesnt that mean water, éducation and work is perhaps even more important then our aim for renewable
energy. Blue gold more important then black gold. Up to now water delivered diversity of life (soil/fertile ground) and oil to much
inequality (polluted air)
In order to get wealthier cities in a healthy world we have to
reduce fossil consumption, reduce transport and reduce corruption/speculation (ground)
Improve work and living by better- food- communication-culture and intelligence/knowledge

2-urgency to analise, monitor and control urban sprawl > distribution of agri/city-culture
As more people move to cities and steadily live in larger spaces, cities are expanding. Most of time they extend occupying fertile land
which originally formed their original basis.
Thats why we should invest in cities full of space, thats to say densely used land, providing people acces and proximity to chances, while
maximising the ecosphere.

3-Distribution of mass/capacity + void/space on different levels
I would advocate here a mix of sky and groundscrapers
Groundscrapers like corals and vertical farming.
‘Cities full of space’ that enhance and emphasize :
Water, parks and vertical farming together with a rich and great capacity to house people and their activities + institutions in à way that
they are closely related to each other without feeling stressed or compressed.

4-laws of density: the dynamics of footprintmanagement and stacking

5- Low rise high density: a promising option for cities

6 atractive cities: distribution and proximity of qualities

At the TUD we studied intensity in capacity and quality >
1. as urban plans easily lose much of their density if you zoom out, the issue of areal density and scale of the area is crucial
defragmentation of footprint
1.we develloped laws of density fundamental - Urban fabrics and light- scale and - excersizing lowrisehighdensity - quality=diversity.
2 Urgency - analysis 2 solutions capacity + scale 3. solutions quality + diversity

portfolio


1. Urgency - analysis space for livingsolutions quality + diversity
2 solutions capacity + scale
3.

To do

Foto onderzoeksmaquettes
Ook kleintjes meenemen/

Studies> inzicht
Stacking is half of the truth>

Breedstraat (Lapjesmarkt) Utrecht
12,5 a 15m breed
urgentie kennis > visie voorbeelden

urgency knowledge vision examples

1

2

3

1

Reinvent the public realm of cityspace; the public domain.


1

2

3

2



1

2

3

3

Herwin de openbaarheid van de stadsruimte;
het publieke domein.


1

2

6
3
5
7 9 4

8 6
74
6
8
5
4
66
1

9



Amman think green

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

Viewers also liked

Viewers also liked (20)

More from Amman Institute

More from Amman Institute (6)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Amman think green