2. INTRODUCTION
•The 3D weaving technology is used for
the production of only specially
industrial fabrics. Keeping high level of
security in mind for protective clothing,
3D fabric play important role.
3. A single-fabric system, the constituent
yarns of which are supposedly disposed in
a three mutually perpendicular plane
relationship
3-D Woven Construction
X
Y
Z
3:34 PM
4. Drawbacks of 2D Construction
• Anisotropic
• Poor in-plane shear resistance
• Less modulus than the fiber material
due to presence of crimp
5. 3D Structure
Yarns are arranged
perpendicular to each
other in X, Y and Z
directions
No interlacing or crimp
exists between yarn
Thickness can be increased
High Fibre Volume Fraction
6. Classification of 3D Structures
I) Based on type of 3D
Structures
3D Solid:
3D Hollow:
Flat surface
Uneven surface
3D Shell:
By weave combination
By differential take-up
By moulding
3D Nodal
II) Based on type of
mechanism
3D Woven
3D Knitted
3D Nonwoven
3D Jacquard
design
Braided structure
III) Based on type of
weaving process
2D weaving – 3D
fabrics
3D weaving – 3D
fabrics
NOOBING
Orthogonal
Warp Interlock
Angle Interlock
7. 3D Solid structure
Orthogonal
It is characterized by straight yarns in warp, weft and
thickness directions
This structure can provide a greater volume fraction
than Warp interlock structures
8. 3D Solid Structure
It is a multilayer fabric
Used for flat panel
reinforcement
Normally woven on a shuttle
loom
Warp Interlock
9. 3D Solid structure
Structures are distinguished by the
individual layers
Each layer may be of different weave
Stitching of layers
Structure ranges from 2 to 4 layers
Angle Interlock
10. 3D profiled Structure
Profiled textile preforms are like beams
Common shapes include I, L, T, U, H, π
These beams have at least one web (vertical part) and one flange
(horizontal part)
Profiled preforms are 3D fabrics as they satisfy the definition :
“A single fabric system the constituent yarns of which are
supposedly disposed in three mutually perpendicular plane
relationship”
17. ‘T’ Profile
Warp arrangement for ‘T’ formation in
the folded manner
Line sketch of ‘T’ joint with insert
Warp arrangement will be in folded form
In the case of ‘T’ profile, weft path cycle constitutes of 4 steps
Warp cross-section and Weft path for developing the ‘T’ profile
3D profile Manufactured on 2D Handloom
18. • Weave design plan for ‘T’ developed using warp cross-section
• It serves as the input for the weaver to develop the profile.
‘T’ Profile Contd..
Weave design Sample woven on handloom
"Recent trends in textile technology and material science“ Technical university of Liberec., 21/06/2012
19. Architectural features of 3D preform
No Fillers/Noodles at web-flange junctions
No stitching/pinning to suppress delamination
Strengthened corner- rounded corner of web-flange prevents stress
concentration, improve performance
Space saving; Create compact structure
no structural looseness and distortion
Easy handling and matrix infusion
20. Overall Advantage of 3D Profiled
3D weaving process uniquely engineers;
High resistance to delamination
High interconnectivity of through-thickness yarns at web-flange junction
High stability of web-flange junction
Efficient production
Cost effective production
Most reliable web-flange junction
22. Application of profiled structures
Stiffeners
Construction elements
Integrated seamless machine components
Working components
Load bearing elements and their web-
flange junctions
23. Profiled structures in assembly
Image courtesy : Second-Generation Woven Profiled 3D Fabrics from 3D-Weaving
26. REFERENCES
Khokar N., Differentiating architectural features of 3D woven profiles for structural application.
Tserpes KI, Cinquin Jacques, and Pantelakis sp., On the mechanical performance of Non-crimp fabric H-shaped adhesively bonded joints, LTSM
university Patras 26500, Greece.
Dr. Islam, M. Amirul, 3D Woen Structures and overview of Manufacturing Technologies, 4th world conference on 3D fabric, Germany,
12/10/2012.
Tserpes, KI, Pantelakis, Sp and Kappatos, V., The effect of imperfect bonding on the pull-out behavior of non-crimp fabric Pi-shaped joints, Comput
Mater Sci 2009; doi:10.1016/j.commatsci.2010.05.012.
Crawford, J. A., Recent developments in multidirectional weaving, NASA Publication No. 2420, pp. 259-269 (1985).
Llopart, P.L., Tserpes, K.I. and Labeas, G.N., Experimental and numerical investigation of the influence of imperfect bonding on the strength of NCF
double-lap shear joints, Compos Struct 2009; 92: 1673–1682.
Khokar, N., Differentiating architectural features of 3D woven profiled for structural application, Proceedings of the fourth world conference on 3D
fabrics, 2012.
http://www.aero-mag.com/features/24/20117/942/
www.sigmatex.com
http://www.albint.com/businesses/aec/IndustryApplications/SampleApplications/Pages/LEAP-Fan-Blade.aspx
http://www.albint.com/businesses/aec/IndustryApplications/SampleApplications/Pages/LEAP-Fan-Casing.aspx
http://www.albint.com/businesses/aec/IndustryApplications/SampleApplications/Pages/787-Dreamliner-Main-Landing-Gear-Brace.aspx
US7712488
Unal, P. G. 3D Woven Fabrics, Namık Kemal University Department of Textile Engineering Turkey