SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 13
Download to read offline
PRESTRESSED CONCRETE 
FRICTION & ANCHORAGE TAKE-UP LOSS BY: AYAZ MALIK 
1 / 13 
FRICTION LOSSES (REF a, b, c & f) 
Consider an infinitesimal length dx of a prestressing tendon whose centroid follows the arc of a circle of radius R, then the change in angle of the tendon as it goes around the length dx is, dα = dxR 
FRICTIONAL LOSS dF ALONG THE LENGTH dx DUE TO CURVATURE FRICTION (Ref. a) 
For this infinitesimal length dx, the stress in the tendon may be considered constant & equal to P; then the normal component of pressure produced by the stress P bending around an angle dα is, N = Pdα = PdxR 
Let, μ be the coefficient of curvature friction & K, the wobble friction coefficient. The amount of frictional loss dP around the length dx is given by, dP = −μN = − μPdxR = −μPdα dPP =−μdα 
Integrating on both sides with limits P1 & P2, ∫ 1PdPP2P1=−∫μdα ln|P2| − ln|P1|=− μα ln| P2P1|=− μα eln| P2P1 | = e−μα P2 = P1e− μα 
If L is the length of the curve with constant radius R, then α = L/ R, P2 = P1e− μLR 
dx 
P – dP 
P 
R 
dα 
dP 
dα 
P – dP 
P 
N = Pdα
PRESTRESSED CONCRETE 
FRICTION & ANCHORAGE TAKE-UP LOSS BY: AYAZ MALIK 
2 / 13 
The above equation gives the frictional loss due to curvature. This equation can also be applied to compute the frictional loss due to wobble or length effect by substituting the loss KL for μα, 
P2 = P1e− KL 
PRESTRESS LOSS DUE TO WOBBLE FRICTION (Ref. b) 
To combine the wobble & curvature effect, we can simply write, P2 = P1e− μα−KL 
Or dividing by tendon area, the above equation can be written in terms of unit stresses, f2 = f1e− μα−KL 
The friction loss is obtained from above expression. Loss of steel stress is given as FR = f1 – f2, where f1 is the steel stress at the jacking end & L is length to the point under consideration. Thus, FR = f1−f2=f1−f1e− μα−KL=f1(1−e− μα−KL) 
For tendons with a succession of curves of varying radii, it is necessary to apply this formula from section to section. The reduced stress at the end of a segment can be used to compute the frictional loss for the next segment. 
Since practically for all prestressed-concrete members, the depth is small compared with the length, the curve is relatively flat. The angular change α is approximately given by the transverse deviation of the tendon divided by the projected length, both referred to the member axis. 
APPROXIMATE DETERMINATION OF CENTRAL ANGLE FOR A TENDON (Ref. a) 
From the figure above, we have, tanα2 = mx/2 = 2mx 
m 
y 
α 
α/2 
x 
x/2 
Actual profile due to wobbling 
Intended profile 
Tendon supports 
α (Intended angle change)
PRESTRESSED CONCRETE 
FRICTION & ANCHORAGE TAKE-UP LOSS BY: AYAZ MALIK 
3 / 13 
In above equation m is approximately equal to twice the sag y. Also, for small angles, the tangent of an angle is nearly equal to the angle itself, measured in radians. Therefore, α2 = 2(2y) x → α = 8yx (radians 
The value of y can be obtained from the arc geometry. Let R be the known radius of the arc, then using the Pythagoras’ theorem, we get, ( x2) 2+(R−y)2=R2 x24+R2+y2−2Ry−R2=0 y2−2Ry+ x24=0 
Solving the above quadratic equation, y can be obtained, which can be used to find the value of α. 
Typical values of wobble friction coefficient & curvature friction coefficient are listed below. These values are taken from Ref. c. Type of Tendon & sheath Wobble Coefficient, K (per meter length x 10-3) Curvature Coefficient, μ Tendons in flexible metal sheathing 
Wire tendons 
3.3 – 5.0 
0.15 – 0.25 
7 wire strands 
1.6 – 6.5 
0.15 – 0.25 
High strength bars 
0.3 – 2.0 
0.08 – 0.30 Tendons in rigid metal sheath 
7 wire strand 
0.70 
0.15 – 0.25 Pre-greased tendons 
Wire tendons & 7 wire strand 
1.0 – 6.5 
0.05 – 0.15 Mastic coated tendons 
Wire tendons & 7 wire strand 
3.3 – 6.6 
0.05 – 0.15 
EXAMPLE 1 – FRICTIONAL LOSS 
A concrete beam, continuous over two spans is post-tensioned at both ends on a flat base. The prestress applied is 1500MPa. The modulus of elasticity of steel & concrete are 200000MPa & 33100 MPa respectively. The beam is prestressed using 7-wire strand. The idealized sections are shown below. Compute the percentage loss of prestress due to friction at middle support. 
IDEALIZED SECTION AT MID-SUPPORT 
αDE 
3.5m 
20m 
A 
B 
C 
D 
E 
800mm 
150mm 
150mm 
αBC 
5m 
5m 
3.5m 
3m 
400mm 
R = 50m 
R = 30m 
F
PRESTRESSED CONCRETE 
FRICTION & ANCHORAGE TAKE-UP LOSS BY: AYAZ MALIK 
4 / 13 
SOLUTION 
Given Data: 
Wobble friction coefficient, K = 0.0018 m –1 
Curvature friction coefficient, μ = 0.2 
Jacking force, F1 = 1500 x 987.1 = 1480650 N 
Geometric Properties: 
Segment 
L (m) 
R (m) 
y2−2Ry+ L24=0 
α = 8yL (radians) 
AB 
3.5 
0 
- 
0 
BC 
10.0 
50 
0.2506 
0.2005 
CD 
3.5 
0 
- 
0 
DF 
6.0 
30 
0.1504 
0.200 
DE 
3.0 
0.100 (αDF/2) 
Frictional Loss: 
To take into account the gradual reduction of stress from A towards E, the tendon is divided into 4 portions from A to E. The reduced prestress force obtained at the end of each segment is used as the starting stress for the next segment. Results are shown below in tabulated form. 
Segment 
L (m) 
KL 
μα 
e – KL – μα 
Reduced Force F1e – KL – μα (N) 
Remarks 
AB 
3.5 
0.0063 
0.0000 
0.9937 
1471321.905 
F1 = 1480650.000 N 
BC 
10.0 
0.0180 
0.0401 
0.9436 
1388367.018 
F1 = 1471351.227 N 
CD 
3.5 
0.0063 
0.0000 
0.9937 
1379620.306 
F1 = 1388367.018 N 
DE 
3.0 
0.0054 
0.0200 
0.9749 
1344991.836 
F1 = 1379620.306 N 
Total frictional loss from A to E = 1480650.000−1344991.8361480650 × 100 = 9.162 % 
ANCHORAGE TAKE-UP LOSS (REF. a, b, e & g) 
For most systems of posttensioning, when a tendon is tensioned to its full value, the jack is released & the prestress is transferred to the anchorage. The anchorage fixtures that are subject to stresses at this transfer will tend to deform, thus allowing the tendon to slacken slightly. Friction wedges employed to hold the wires will slip a little distance before the wires can be firmly gripped. The amount of slippage depends on the type of wedge & the stress in the wires, but it is typically between 3mm to 9mm. For direct bearing anchorages, the heads & nuts are subject to a slight deformation at the release of the jack. An average value for such deformations may be only about
PRESTRESSED CONCRETE 
FRICTION & ANCHORAGE TAKE-UP LOSS BY: AYAZ MALIK 
5 / 13 
0.75mm. If long shims are required to hold the elongated wires in place, there will be a deformation in the shims at transfer of prestress. As an example, a shim 0.3m long may deform 0.25mm. 
Wide variation can occur & large anchorage “set” or “take-up” is possible due to the fact that the hard, smooth wires may not immediately grip the steel before it has slipped through. A general formula for computing the loss of prestress due to anchorage deformation Δa is Δfs = ΔaEsL 
where, 
Δa = Amount of slip 
L = Tendon length of the tendon 
Es = Elastic modulus of the prestressing steel 
The above equation is based on the assumption that the slip is uniformly distributed over the length of the tendon. This is approximately so for pretension, & may apply for posttensioning, if the tendon is well greased or encased in low-friction plastic sheathing, & if wobble & curvature are small. For many post-tensioned beams, however, the anchorage slip loss is mostly confined to a region close to the jacking anchorage. Distribution along the tendon is prevented by reverse friction as the tendon slips inward, & the steel stress throughout much of the tendon length may be unaffected by anchorage slip. 
PRESTRESS VARIATION BEFORE & AFTER ANCHORAGE (Ref. e & g) 
Referring to the figure above, curves OB and AB are both characterized by the frictional parameters of the prestressing system. Once these parameters are known together with the anchorage take-up distance a , the length b of the back sliding segment and the stress loss at any location can be calculated. The basic relationship for loss of prestress due to friction is, fx = foe−(μ α + K x)=foe−kx 
where, 
α = Angle change
PRESTRESSED CONCRETE 
FRICTION & ANCHORAGE TAKE-UP LOSS BY: AYAZ MALIK 
6 / 13 
x = Distance between two points 
μ = Coefficient of friction 
K = Wobble coefficient 
k = Friction index 
From the figure above, the tendon stress before and after anchorage take-up is, respectively, f1 = foe−kx f2 = fbe− k(b − x)=foe−2kb ekx 
The area OAB is obtained by integration, ∫(f1−f2) bodx= 1kfo(1−e−kb) 2 
Therefore, Esk Δafo=(1−e−kb) 2 
Solving the equation for b, we get b = −( 1k) ln(1−√ Esk Δafo) 
The following equation gives the anchorage loss at the end of the beam where jacking force is applied, fo−fa = fo(1−e−2bk) 
To find anchorage loss at any point from the end of the beam, following equation is used, f1−f2 = foe− k x(1−e−2k(b − x)) 
where, x is the distance from jacking end to the point under consideration. For a location outside the anchorage length (x > b), the steel stress is not affected by the anchorage losses. For a location inside the anchorage length (x < b), loss due to both, friction & anchorage seating occurs & is given by the above equation. It should be remember that the above equation is valid only if b < le, where le is effective beam length or the maximum length available for distribution of anchorage seating losses; one half of the member length if tensioning is done from both ends simultaneously; length of the member if post-tensioning is done from one end only. 
The importance of anchorage slip also depends on the length of the member or casting bed. For very short tendons, anchorage set will produce high slip losses. For long tendons or casting beds, slip becomes insignificant. The above equations deal with tendon profiles in a single uniform curvature only.
PRESTRESSED CONCRETE 
FRICTION & ANCHORAGE TAKE-UP LOSS BY: AYAZ MALIK 
7 / 13 
TWO-SEGMENT VARIATION (Ref. g) 
For cases where the back sliding takes place over several segments of different curvatures, the problem becomes a little more complicated. Consider the case where two segments with friction indices k1 and k2 are involved, as shown in the figure. Tendon stress before anchoring is, fx = foe−k1 x when 0 ≤ x ≤ b1 fx = foe−k1 b1 e−k2(x − b1) when b1 ≤ x ≤ b1+b 
After anchorage take-up losses, the tendon stress is, fx = foe−(2 k1 b1 + 2 k2 b)ek 2(x − b1) when 0 ≤ x ≤ b1 fx = foe−( k1 b1 + 2 k2 b)ek 2(x − b1) when b1 ≤ x ≤ b1+b 
Upon integration, the following equation is obtained, [ k1k2−(1−e−k1b1)](1−e−k2 b) 2+2(1−e−k1 b1)(1−e−k2 b)− 1e−k1 b1[ Ek1Δfo−(1−e−k1 b1) 2]=0 
This is a quadratic equation in terms of the unknown parameter (1 – e –k2b). 
STRESS VERSUS TIME IN THE STRANDS OF A PRETENSIONED CONCRETE GIRDER (Ref. l)
PRESTRESSED CONCRETE 
FRICTION & ANCHORAGE TAKE-UP LOSS BY: AYAZ MALIK 
8 / 13 
The figure above shows the losses that occur with time in the strands in a pretensioned concrete girder. By the end of this lecture only friction and anchorage seating loss, & elastic shortening have been discussed. Other losses, which are time-dependent losses such as creep, shrinkage and relaxation of steel, will be discussed in next lecture. 
EXAMPLE 2 – FRICTION & ANCHORAGE TAKE-UP LOSS 
A 12m long beam is posttensioned from one end. The tendon has a parabolic profile as shown in the figure with a constant curvature. Compute the percentage loss of prestress due to friction and anchorage take-up if the jacking stress is 1100 N/mm2. 
IDEALIZED SECTION AT MID-SECTION 
SOLUTION 
Given Data: 
Wobble friction coefficient, K = 0.004 m –1 
Curvature friction coefficient, μ = 0.3 
Amount of slip, Δa = 1.5 mm 
Tendon depression, y = 150 mm 
Therefore, k = μαx + K = 0.38(0.15)12⁄ 12 + 0.004 = 0.0065 per m 
Back-slip penetration Length: 
The length of back sliding is calculated using the following equation; b = −( 1k) ln(1−√ Esk Δafo)=−( 10.0065)ln(1−√ 200000(0.0065)(0.0015) 1100)=6.618 m 
Friction & Anchorage Take-Up Loss: 
The following equation gives the anchorage loss at the end of the beam where jacking force is applied, fo−fa = fo(1−e−2bk)=1100(1−e−2(6.618)(0.0065))=90.678 MPa 
To find anchorage loss at any point from the end of the beam, following equation is used, f1−f2 = foe− k x(1−e−2k(b − x)) 
150mm 
L = 12m
PRESTRESSED CONCRETE 
FRICTION & ANCHORAGE TAKE-UP LOSS BY: AYAZ MALIK 
9 / 13 
Where, f1 = foe−kx for 0≤x≤L (Before anchorage loss) f2 = fbe− k(b − x)=foe−2kb ekx for 0≤x≤b (After anchorage loss) 
These equations are used to generate a table showing loss of prestress due to friction (f1) and due to anchorage (f2). The results are plotted on the graph. x f1 f2 Friction loss, fo – f1 Anchorage loss, f1 – f2 m MPa MPa MPa MPa 0 1100.000 1009.322 0 90.678 2 1085.793 1022.529 7.127 63.264 4 1071.769 1035.908 28.231 35.860 6 1057.926 1049.463 42.074 8.463 b = 6.618 1053.686 1053.686 46.314 0.000 8 1044.262 - 55.738 - 10 1030.774 - 69.226 - 12 1017.461 - 82.539 - 
The above results show that the anchorage loss is significant near the jacking end of the beam and reduces to zero at distance b from the jacking end. Also, back slip takes place over more than half of the tendon. The total losses of prestress due to friction and anchorage are, Percentage loss of prestress due to friction = 82.5391100.000×100 = 7.504 % 
1000 
1020 
1040 
1060 
1080 
1100 
1120 
0 
2 
4 
6 
8 
10 
12 
14 
Prestress (MPa) 
Distance 'x' from the jacking end of the beam (m) 
PRESTRESS LOSS DUE TO FRICTION & ANCHORAGE 
f1 
f2 
fo – fa 
f1 – f2 
le 
fo – f1
PRESTRESSED CONCRETE 
FRICTION & ANCHORAGE TAKE-UP LOSS BY: AYAZ MALIK 
10 / 13 
Percentage loss of prestress due to anchorage = 90.6781100.000×100 = 8.243 % 
Note that the anchorage loss is calculated at the jacking end since it has maximum value at this location, while friction loss is calculated for the whole length of the tendon. 
EXAMPLE 3 – FRICTION & ANCHORAGE TAKE-UP LOSS – VARIABLE CURVATURE 
A 36m long beam is posttensioned from both ends. The tendon has a parabolic profile in the middle 30m, with a radius of 750m as shown in the figure. Tendon is straight in the 3m regions near each end. Compute the percentage loss of prestress due to friction and anchorage take-up if the jacking stress is 1200 N/mm2. 
SOLUTION 
Given Data: 
Wobble friction coefficient, K = 0.002 m –1 
Curvature friction coefficient, μ = 0.30 
Amount of slip, Δa = 1.50 mm 
b1 or L1 = 3.00 m 
L2 = 30.00 m 
R1 = 0 m 
R2 = 750.00 m 
Geometric Properties: 
Depression of the middle portion of the tendon can be calculated using the following equation y22−2R2y2+ L224=0 y22−2(750)y2+ (30)24=0 
Solving the above quadratic equation, we get, y2=0.150 m 
Therefore, 
L1 
R = 750m 
L2
PRESTRESSED CONCRETE 
FRICTION & ANCHORAGE TAKE-UP LOSS BY: AYAZ MALIK 
11 / 13 
α1 = 0 α2 = 8y22L2 = 8(0.150) 2(30) = 0.02 radians k1 = μα1L1 + K = 0.303 + 0.002 = 0.0020 per m k2 = μα2L22⁄ + K = 0.30.02015 + 0.002 = 0.0024 per m 
Back-slip penetration Length: 
Assuming that the back-slip is restricted to the first segment, the maximum anchorage take-up is calculated using the following equation, Esk 1Δ1fo=(1−e−k1b1) 2 
Solving the above equation we get, Δ1= [1−e−(0.002)(3)] 2(1200) 200000(0.002) =0.00011 m 
Since 1 is less than the specified anchorage take-up, back-slip penetrates beyond the first segment and equation for two segments has to be used to calculate the back-slip penetration length. 
The length of back sliding is calculated using the following equation; [ k1k2−(1−e−k1b1)](1−e−k2 b) 2+2(1−e−k1 b1)(1−e−k2 b)− 1e−k1 b1[ Ek1Δfo−(1−e−k1 b1) 2]=0 
This equation is quadratic in terms of (1−e−k2 b). Solving the above equation yields, 1−e−k2 b=0.0176 b=7.400 m 
Friction & Anchorage Take-Up Loss: 
The following equations give the prestress loss before the anchorage loss occurs i.e., the loss is only due to friction, f1 = foe−k1 x when 0 ≤ x ≤ b1 f1 = foe−k1 b1 e−k2(x − b1) when b1 ≤ x ≤ b1+b 
After anchorage take-up losses, the tendon stress is given by the following equations, f2 = foe−(2 k1 b1 + 2 k2 b)ek 2(x − b1) when 0 ≤ x ≤ b1 f2 = foe−( k1 b1 + 2 k2 b)ek 2(x − b1) when b1 ≤ x ≤ b1+b 
These equations are used to generate a table showing loss of prestress due to friction (f1) and due to anchorage (f2). The results are plotted on the graph.
PRESTRESSED CONCRETE 
FRICTION & ANCHORAGE TAKE-UP LOSS BY: AYAZ MALIK 
12 / 13 
x f1 f2 Friction loss, fo – f1 Anchorage loss, f1 – f2 m MPa MPa MPa MPa 0 1200.000 1136.098 0.000 63.902 1 1197.602 1138.828 2.398 58.774 2 1195.210 1141.565 4.790 53.645 b1 = 3 1192.822 1144.308 7.178 48.514 4 1189.962 1153.961 10.038 36.002 5 1187.110 1156.733 12.890 30.376 6 1184.264 1159.513 15.736 24.751 7 1181.425 1162.299 18.575 19.126 8 1178.593 1165.092 21.407 13.501 b + b1 = 10.4 1171.823 1171.823 28.177 0.000 12 1167.332 - 32.668 - 14 1161.743 - 38.257 - 16 1156.180 - 43.820 - 18 1150.643 - 49.357 - 
The total losses of prestress due to friction and anchorage are, 
1120 
1140 
1160 
1180 
1200 
1220 
0 
2 
4 
6 
8 
10 
12 
14 
16 
18 
Prestress (MPa) 
Distance 'x' from the Jacking End of the Beam (m) 
PRESTRESS LOSS DUE TO FRICTION & ANCHORAGE 
f1 
f2 
f1 – f2 
b1 
b1 + b 
fo – f1
PRESTRESSED CONCRETE 
FRICTION & ANCHORAGE TAKE-UP LOSS BY: AYAZ MALIK 
13 / 13 
Percentage loss of prestress due to friction = 49.3571200.000×100 = 4.113 % Percentage loss of prestress due to anchorage = 63.9021200.000×100 = 5.325 % 
Note that the anchorage loss is calculated at the jacking end since it has maximum value at this location, while friction loss is calculated for the half length of the tendon (Since jacking force is applied at both ends). 
REFERENCES 
a. T. Y. Lin, Ned H. Burns, “Design of Prestressed Concrete Structures”, 3rd Edition, 1981 
b. Arthur H. Nilson, “Design of Prestressed Concrete”, 2nd Edition, 1987 
c. Cement Association of Canada, “Concrete Design Handbook”, 3rd Edition, 2012 
d. Canadian Standards Association, “CAN/CSA-A23.3-04–Design of Concrete Structures”, 2007 
e. Ti Huang, Burt Hoffman, “Prediction of Prestress Losses in Posttensioned Members”, Department of Transportation, Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, 1978 
f. Gail S. Kelly, “Prestress Losses in Posttensioned Structures”, PTI Technical Notes, 2000 
g. Ti Huang, “Anchorage take-up loss in Posttensioned Members”, 1969 
h. PCI, “Post-Tensioning Manual”, 1972 
i. Maher K. Tadros, Nabil Al-Omaishi, Stephen J. Seguirant, James G. Gallt, “Prestress Losses in Pretensioned High-strength Concrete Bridge Girders”, NCHRP Report 496, 2003

More Related Content

What's hot

Redistribution of moments-Part-1
Redistribution of moments-Part-1Redistribution of moments-Part-1
Redistribution of moments-Part-1Subhash Patankar
 
Numerical problem and solution on pile capacity (usefulsearch.org) ( usefuls...
Numerical problem and solution on pile capacity (usefulsearch.org) ( usefuls...Numerical problem and solution on pile capacity (usefulsearch.org) ( usefuls...
Numerical problem and solution on pile capacity (usefulsearch.org) ( usefuls...Make Mannan
 
Geotechnical Engineering-II [Lec #18: Terzaghi Bearing Capacity Equation]
Geotechnical Engineering-II [Lec #18: Terzaghi Bearing Capacity Equation]Geotechnical Engineering-II [Lec #18: Terzaghi Bearing Capacity Equation]
Geotechnical Engineering-II [Lec #18: Terzaghi Bearing Capacity Equation]Muhammad Irfan
 
Geotechnical Engineering-II [Lec #8: Boussinesq Method - Rectangular Areas]
Geotechnical Engineering-II [Lec #8: Boussinesq Method - Rectangular Areas]Geotechnical Engineering-II [Lec #8: Boussinesq Method - Rectangular Areas]
Geotechnical Engineering-II [Lec #8: Boussinesq Method - Rectangular Areas]Muhammad Irfan
 
Problems on piles and deep footing
Problems on piles and deep footingProblems on piles and deep footing
Problems on piles and deep footingLatif Hyder Wadho
 
Geotechnical Engineering-II [Lec #7A: Boussinesq Method]
Geotechnical Engineering-II [Lec #7A: Boussinesq Method]Geotechnical Engineering-II [Lec #7A: Boussinesq Method]
Geotechnical Engineering-II [Lec #7A: Boussinesq Method]Muhammad Irfan
 
Eccentric connections 1
Eccentric connections 1Eccentric connections 1
Eccentric connections 1sky hawk
 
Stiffness method of structural analysis
Stiffness method of structural analysisStiffness method of structural analysis
Stiffness method of structural analysisKaran Patel
 
Singly R.C. beam
Singly R.C. beam  Singly R.C. beam
Singly R.C. beam Yash Patel
 
23-Design of Column Base Plates (Steel Structural Design & Prof. Shehab Mourad)
23-Design of Column Base Plates (Steel Structural Design & Prof. Shehab Mourad)23-Design of Column Base Plates (Steel Structural Design & Prof. Shehab Mourad)
23-Design of Column Base Plates (Steel Structural Design & Prof. Shehab Mourad)Hossam Shafiq II
 
Design of columns uniaxial load as per IS 456-2000
Design of columns  uniaxial load as per IS 456-2000Design of columns  uniaxial load as per IS 456-2000
Design of columns uniaxial load as per IS 456-2000PraveenKumar Shanmugam
 
Soil arching in granular soil
Soil arching in granular soilSoil arching in granular soil
Soil arching in granular soilJithu G Francis
 

What's hot (20)

7 losses in prestress
7 losses in prestress7 losses in prestress
7 losses in prestress
 
Redistribution of moments-Part-1
Redistribution of moments-Part-1Redistribution of moments-Part-1
Redistribution of moments-Part-1
 
Chapter 12
Chapter 12Chapter 12
Chapter 12
 
Numerical problem and solution on pile capacity (usefulsearch.org) ( usefuls...
Numerical problem and solution on pile capacity (usefulsearch.org) ( usefuls...Numerical problem and solution on pile capacity (usefulsearch.org) ( usefuls...
Numerical problem and solution on pile capacity (usefulsearch.org) ( usefuls...
 
Geotechnical Engineering-II [Lec #18: Terzaghi Bearing Capacity Equation]
Geotechnical Engineering-II [Lec #18: Terzaghi Bearing Capacity Equation]Geotechnical Engineering-II [Lec #18: Terzaghi Bearing Capacity Equation]
Geotechnical Engineering-II [Lec #18: Terzaghi Bearing Capacity Equation]
 
Geotechnical Engineering-II [Lec #8: Boussinesq Method - Rectangular Areas]
Geotechnical Engineering-II [Lec #8: Boussinesq Method - Rectangular Areas]Geotechnical Engineering-II [Lec #8: Boussinesq Method - Rectangular Areas]
Geotechnical Engineering-II [Lec #8: Boussinesq Method - Rectangular Areas]
 
Problems on piles and deep footing
Problems on piles and deep footingProblems on piles and deep footing
Problems on piles and deep footing
 
Geotechnical Engineering-II [Lec #7A: Boussinesq Method]
Geotechnical Engineering-II [Lec #7A: Boussinesq Method]Geotechnical Engineering-II [Lec #7A: Boussinesq Method]
Geotechnical Engineering-II [Lec #7A: Boussinesq Method]
 
Design and analysis of slabs
Design and analysis of slabsDesign and analysis of slabs
Design and analysis of slabs
 
05 chapter 6 mat foundations
05 chapter 6 mat foundations05 chapter 6 mat foundations
05 chapter 6 mat foundations
 
Eccentric connections 1
Eccentric connections 1Eccentric connections 1
Eccentric connections 1
 
Lecture 8 raft foundation
Lecture 8 raft foundationLecture 8 raft foundation
Lecture 8 raft foundation
 
Reinfored beam
Reinfored beamReinfored beam
Reinfored beam
 
Stiffness method of structural analysis
Stiffness method of structural analysisStiffness method of structural analysis
Stiffness method of structural analysis
 
Singly R.C. beam
Singly R.C. beam  Singly R.C. beam
Singly R.C. beam
 
23-Design of Column Base Plates (Steel Structural Design & Prof. Shehab Mourad)
23-Design of Column Base Plates (Steel Structural Design & Prof. Shehab Mourad)23-Design of Column Base Plates (Steel Structural Design & Prof. Shehab Mourad)
23-Design of Column Base Plates (Steel Structural Design & Prof. Shehab Mourad)
 
Design of columns uniaxial load as per IS 456-2000
Design of columns  uniaxial load as per IS 456-2000Design of columns  uniaxial load as per IS 456-2000
Design of columns uniaxial load as per IS 456-2000
 
Eccentric connections in steel structure
Eccentric connections in steel structureEccentric connections in steel structure
Eccentric connections in steel structure
 
Soil arching in granular soil
Soil arching in granular soilSoil arching in granular soil
Soil arching in granular soil
 
Chapter 1
Chapter 1Chapter 1
Chapter 1
 

Viewers also liked

M.tech seminar
M.tech seminarM.tech seminar
M.tech seminarvartika07
 
Catalogue de dimensionnement des chaussees neuves (fascicule1)
Catalogue de dimensionnement des chaussees neuves (fascicule1)Catalogue de dimensionnement des chaussees neuves (fascicule1)
Catalogue de dimensionnement des chaussees neuves (fascicule1)Adel Nehaoua
 
Projet urbain sur Bardo Constantine
Projet urbain sur Bardo Constantine Projet urbain sur Bardo Constantine
Projet urbain sur Bardo Constantine Hayat GOUDJIL
 
Design optimization of excavator bucket using Finite Element Method
Design optimization of excavator bucket using Finite Element MethodDesign optimization of excavator bucket using Finite Element Method
Design optimization of excavator bucket using Finite Element MethodIjripublishers Ijri
 

Viewers also liked (9)

Prestress loss
Prestress lossPrestress loss
Prestress loss
 
M.tech seminar
M.tech seminarM.tech seminar
M.tech seminar
 
Atelier projet urbain
Atelier  projet urbain Atelier  projet urbain
Atelier projet urbain
 
Catalogue de dimensionnement des chaussees neuves (fascicule1)
Catalogue de dimensionnement des chaussees neuves (fascicule1)Catalogue de dimensionnement des chaussees neuves (fascicule1)
Catalogue de dimensionnement des chaussees neuves (fascicule1)
 
Thesis_3_10
Thesis_3_10Thesis_3_10
Thesis_3_10
 
13 21 (1)
13 21 (1)13 21 (1)
13 21 (1)
 
Projet urbain sur Bardo Constantine
Projet urbain sur Bardo Constantine Projet urbain sur Bardo Constantine
Projet urbain sur Bardo Constantine
 
Design optimization of excavator bucket using Finite Element Method
Design optimization of excavator bucket using Finite Element MethodDesign optimization of excavator bucket using Finite Element Method
Design optimization of excavator bucket using Finite Element Method
 
Working of dragline
Working of draglineWorking of dragline
Working of dragline
 

Similar to Prestress loss due to friction & anchorage take up

Modifed Flextural stresses .pptx
Modifed Flextural stresses .pptxModifed Flextural stresses .pptx
Modifed Flextural stresses .pptxShiva krishna gupta
 
1. simple stress_strain
1. simple stress_strain1. simple stress_strain
1. simple stress_strainamitsomwanshi
 
stress_strain SS ramamrutham.ppt
stress_strain SS ramamrutham.pptstress_strain SS ramamrutham.ppt
stress_strain SS ramamrutham.pptsujantjha2
 
Loss of Prestress.pptx
Loss of Prestress.pptxLoss of Prestress.pptx
Loss of Prestress.pptxUmarSaba1
 
rectangular and section analysis in bending and shear
rectangular and section analysis in bending and shearrectangular and section analysis in bending and shear
rectangular and section analysis in bending and shearqueripan
 
Lec5 torsion of thin walled beams
Lec5 torsion of thin walled beamsLec5 torsion of thin walled beams
Lec5 torsion of thin walled beamsMahdi Damghani
 
Aci reinforcement limits
Aci reinforcement limitsAci reinforcement limits
Aci reinforcement limitsMeesum Zaidi
 
Deflections in PT elements pt structure for all pt slabs in civil industry.pdf
Deflections in PT elements pt structure for all pt slabs in civil industry.pdfDeflections in PT elements pt structure for all pt slabs in civil industry.pdf
Deflections in PT elements pt structure for all pt slabs in civil industry.pdfvijayvijay327286
 
column and it's types
column and it's  types column and it's  types
column and it's types Asi Mahar
 
10346 07 08 examination paper
10346 07 08 examination paper10346 07 08 examination paper
10346 07 08 examination paperEddy Ching
 
Design ppt
Design pptDesign ppt
Design ppttishu001
 
Simple stresses and Stain
Simple stresses and StainSimple stresses and Stain
Simple stresses and StainHamood Saif
 
Conceps of RCC-PCC.pptx
Conceps of RCC-PCC.pptxConceps of RCC-PCC.pptx
Conceps of RCC-PCC.pptxastor11
 
Steel strucure lec # (4) copy
Steel strucure lec #  (4)  copySteel strucure lec #  (4)  copy
Steel strucure lec # (4) copyCivil Zone
 
Torsion Hollow Shaft
Torsion Hollow ShaftTorsion Hollow Shaft
Torsion Hollow Shafttejasp
 

Similar to Prestress loss due to friction & anchorage take up (20)

Modifed Flextural stresses .pptx
Modifed Flextural stresses .pptxModifed Flextural stresses .pptx
Modifed Flextural stresses .pptx
 
1. simple stress_strain
1. simple stress_strain1. simple stress_strain
1. simple stress_strain
 
stress_strain SS ramamrutham.ppt
stress_strain SS ramamrutham.pptstress_strain SS ramamrutham.ppt
stress_strain SS ramamrutham.ppt
 
Loss of Prestress.pptx
Loss of Prestress.pptxLoss of Prestress.pptx
Loss of Prestress.pptx
 
mos unit -3.pptx
mos unit -3.pptxmos unit -3.pptx
mos unit -3.pptx
 
rectangular and section analysis in bending and shear
rectangular and section analysis in bending and shearrectangular and section analysis in bending and shear
rectangular and section analysis in bending and shear
 
Lec5 torsion of thin walled beams
Lec5 torsion of thin walled beamsLec5 torsion of thin walled beams
Lec5 torsion of thin walled beams
 
Aci reinforcement limits
Aci reinforcement limitsAci reinforcement limits
Aci reinforcement limits
 
Deflections in PT elements pt structure for all pt slabs in civil industry.pdf
Deflections in PT elements pt structure for all pt slabs in civil industry.pdfDeflections in PT elements pt structure for all pt slabs in civil industry.pdf
Deflections in PT elements pt structure for all pt slabs in civil industry.pdf
 
Compression member
Compression memberCompression member
Compression member
 
column and it's types
column and it's  types column and it's  types
column and it's types
 
Fundamentals of-psc-bridge
Fundamentals of-psc-bridgeFundamentals of-psc-bridge
Fundamentals of-psc-bridge
 
10346 07 08 examination paper
10346 07 08 examination paper10346 07 08 examination paper
10346 07 08 examination paper
 
Design ppt
Design pptDesign ppt
Design ppt
 
Simple stresses and Stain
Simple stresses and StainSimple stresses and Stain
Simple stresses and Stain
 
Bending stresses
Bending stressesBending stresses
Bending stresses
 
U01232170177
U01232170177U01232170177
U01232170177
 
Conceps of RCC-PCC.pptx
Conceps of RCC-PCC.pptxConceps of RCC-PCC.pptx
Conceps of RCC-PCC.pptx
 
Steel strucure lec # (4) copy
Steel strucure lec #  (4)  copySteel strucure lec #  (4)  copy
Steel strucure lec # (4) copy
 
Torsion Hollow Shaft
Torsion Hollow ShaftTorsion Hollow Shaft
Torsion Hollow Shaft
 

Recently uploaded

FUNCTIONAL AND NON FUNCTIONAL REQUIREMENT
FUNCTIONAL AND NON FUNCTIONAL REQUIREMENTFUNCTIONAL AND NON FUNCTIONAL REQUIREMENT
FUNCTIONAL AND NON FUNCTIONAL REQUIREMENTSneha Padhiar
 
Engineering Drawing section of solid
Engineering Drawing     section of solidEngineering Drawing     section of solid
Engineering Drawing section of solidnamansinghjarodiya
 
Input Output Management in Operating System
Input Output Management in Operating SystemInput Output Management in Operating System
Input Output Management in Operating SystemRashmi Bhat
 
2022 AWS DNA Hackathon 장애 대응 솔루션 jarvis.
2022 AWS DNA Hackathon 장애 대응 솔루션 jarvis.2022 AWS DNA Hackathon 장애 대응 솔루션 jarvis.
2022 AWS DNA Hackathon 장애 대응 솔루션 jarvis.elesangwon
 
High Voltage Engineering- OVER VOLTAGES IN ELECTRICAL POWER SYSTEMS
High Voltage Engineering- OVER VOLTAGES IN ELECTRICAL POWER SYSTEMSHigh Voltage Engineering- OVER VOLTAGES IN ELECTRICAL POWER SYSTEMS
High Voltage Engineering- OVER VOLTAGES IN ELECTRICAL POWER SYSTEMSsandhya757531
 
Paper Tube : Shigeru Ban projects and Case Study of Cardboard Cathedral .pdf
Paper Tube : Shigeru Ban projects and Case Study of Cardboard Cathedral .pdfPaper Tube : Shigeru Ban projects and Case Study of Cardboard Cathedral .pdf
Paper Tube : Shigeru Ban projects and Case Study of Cardboard Cathedral .pdfNainaShrivastava14
 
THE SENDAI FRAMEWORK FOR DISASTER RISK REDUCTION
THE SENDAI FRAMEWORK FOR DISASTER RISK REDUCTIONTHE SENDAI FRAMEWORK FOR DISASTER RISK REDUCTION
THE SENDAI FRAMEWORK FOR DISASTER RISK REDUCTIONjhunlian
 
Main Memory Management in Operating System
Main Memory Management in Operating SystemMain Memory Management in Operating System
Main Memory Management in Operating SystemRashmi Bhat
 
"Exploring the Essential Functions and Design Considerations of Spillways in ...
"Exploring the Essential Functions and Design Considerations of Spillways in ..."Exploring the Essential Functions and Design Considerations of Spillways in ...
"Exploring the Essential Functions and Design Considerations of Spillways in ...Erbil Polytechnic University
 
Module-1-(Building Acoustics) Noise Control (Unit-3). pdf
Module-1-(Building Acoustics) Noise Control (Unit-3). pdfModule-1-(Building Acoustics) Noise Control (Unit-3). pdf
Module-1-(Building Acoustics) Noise Control (Unit-3). pdfManish Kumar
 
Stork Webinar | APM Transformational planning, Tool Selection & Performance T...
Stork Webinar | APM Transformational planning, Tool Selection & Performance T...Stork Webinar | APM Transformational planning, Tool Selection & Performance T...
Stork Webinar | APM Transformational planning, Tool Selection & Performance T...Stork
 
Comparative study of High-rise Building Using ETABS,SAP200 and SAFE., SAFE an...
Comparative study of High-rise Building Using ETABS,SAP200 and SAFE., SAFE an...Comparative study of High-rise Building Using ETABS,SAP200 and SAFE., SAFE an...
Comparative study of High-rise Building Using ETABS,SAP200 and SAFE., SAFE an...Erbil Polytechnic University
 
US Department of Education FAFSA Week of Action
US Department of Education FAFSA Week of ActionUS Department of Education FAFSA Week of Action
US Department of Education FAFSA Week of ActionMebane Rash
 
Python Programming for basic beginners.pptx
Python Programming for basic beginners.pptxPython Programming for basic beginners.pptx
Python Programming for basic beginners.pptxmohitesoham12
 
KCD Costa Rica 2024 - Nephio para parvulitos
KCD Costa Rica 2024 - Nephio para parvulitosKCD Costa Rica 2024 - Nephio para parvulitos
KCD Costa Rica 2024 - Nephio para parvulitosVictor Morales
 
CME 397 - SURFACE ENGINEERING - UNIT 1 FULL NOTES
CME 397 - SURFACE ENGINEERING - UNIT 1 FULL NOTESCME 397 - SURFACE ENGINEERING - UNIT 1 FULL NOTES
CME 397 - SURFACE ENGINEERING - UNIT 1 FULL NOTESkarthi keyan
 
11. Properties of Liquid Fuels in Energy Engineering.pdf
11. Properties of Liquid Fuels in Energy Engineering.pdf11. Properties of Liquid Fuels in Energy Engineering.pdf
11. Properties of Liquid Fuels in Energy Engineering.pdfHafizMudaserAhmad
 
Robotics Group 10 (Control Schemes) cse.pdf
Robotics Group 10  (Control Schemes) cse.pdfRobotics Group 10  (Control Schemes) cse.pdf
Robotics Group 10 (Control Schemes) cse.pdfsahilsajad201
 
Cost estimation approach: FP to COCOMO scenario based question
Cost estimation approach: FP to COCOMO scenario based questionCost estimation approach: FP to COCOMO scenario based question
Cost estimation approach: FP to COCOMO scenario based questionSneha Padhiar
 

Recently uploaded (20)

FUNCTIONAL AND NON FUNCTIONAL REQUIREMENT
FUNCTIONAL AND NON FUNCTIONAL REQUIREMENTFUNCTIONAL AND NON FUNCTIONAL REQUIREMENT
FUNCTIONAL AND NON FUNCTIONAL REQUIREMENT
 
Engineering Drawing section of solid
Engineering Drawing     section of solidEngineering Drawing     section of solid
Engineering Drawing section of solid
 
Input Output Management in Operating System
Input Output Management in Operating SystemInput Output Management in Operating System
Input Output Management in Operating System
 
2022 AWS DNA Hackathon 장애 대응 솔루션 jarvis.
2022 AWS DNA Hackathon 장애 대응 솔루션 jarvis.2022 AWS DNA Hackathon 장애 대응 솔루션 jarvis.
2022 AWS DNA Hackathon 장애 대응 솔루션 jarvis.
 
High Voltage Engineering- OVER VOLTAGES IN ELECTRICAL POWER SYSTEMS
High Voltage Engineering- OVER VOLTAGES IN ELECTRICAL POWER SYSTEMSHigh Voltage Engineering- OVER VOLTAGES IN ELECTRICAL POWER SYSTEMS
High Voltage Engineering- OVER VOLTAGES IN ELECTRICAL POWER SYSTEMS
 
Paper Tube : Shigeru Ban projects and Case Study of Cardboard Cathedral .pdf
Paper Tube : Shigeru Ban projects and Case Study of Cardboard Cathedral .pdfPaper Tube : Shigeru Ban projects and Case Study of Cardboard Cathedral .pdf
Paper Tube : Shigeru Ban projects and Case Study of Cardboard Cathedral .pdf
 
THE SENDAI FRAMEWORK FOR DISASTER RISK REDUCTION
THE SENDAI FRAMEWORK FOR DISASTER RISK REDUCTIONTHE SENDAI FRAMEWORK FOR DISASTER RISK REDUCTION
THE SENDAI FRAMEWORK FOR DISASTER RISK REDUCTION
 
Main Memory Management in Operating System
Main Memory Management in Operating SystemMain Memory Management in Operating System
Main Memory Management in Operating System
 
"Exploring the Essential Functions and Design Considerations of Spillways in ...
"Exploring the Essential Functions and Design Considerations of Spillways in ..."Exploring the Essential Functions and Design Considerations of Spillways in ...
"Exploring the Essential Functions and Design Considerations of Spillways in ...
 
Module-1-(Building Acoustics) Noise Control (Unit-3). pdf
Module-1-(Building Acoustics) Noise Control (Unit-3). pdfModule-1-(Building Acoustics) Noise Control (Unit-3). pdf
Module-1-(Building Acoustics) Noise Control (Unit-3). pdf
 
Stork Webinar | APM Transformational planning, Tool Selection & Performance T...
Stork Webinar | APM Transformational planning, Tool Selection & Performance T...Stork Webinar | APM Transformational planning, Tool Selection & Performance T...
Stork Webinar | APM Transformational planning, Tool Selection & Performance T...
 
Designing pile caps according to ACI 318-19.pptx
Designing pile caps according to ACI 318-19.pptxDesigning pile caps according to ACI 318-19.pptx
Designing pile caps according to ACI 318-19.pptx
 
Comparative study of High-rise Building Using ETABS,SAP200 and SAFE., SAFE an...
Comparative study of High-rise Building Using ETABS,SAP200 and SAFE., SAFE an...Comparative study of High-rise Building Using ETABS,SAP200 and SAFE., SAFE an...
Comparative study of High-rise Building Using ETABS,SAP200 and SAFE., SAFE an...
 
US Department of Education FAFSA Week of Action
US Department of Education FAFSA Week of ActionUS Department of Education FAFSA Week of Action
US Department of Education FAFSA Week of Action
 
Python Programming for basic beginners.pptx
Python Programming for basic beginners.pptxPython Programming for basic beginners.pptx
Python Programming for basic beginners.pptx
 
KCD Costa Rica 2024 - Nephio para parvulitos
KCD Costa Rica 2024 - Nephio para parvulitosKCD Costa Rica 2024 - Nephio para parvulitos
KCD Costa Rica 2024 - Nephio para parvulitos
 
CME 397 - SURFACE ENGINEERING - UNIT 1 FULL NOTES
CME 397 - SURFACE ENGINEERING - UNIT 1 FULL NOTESCME 397 - SURFACE ENGINEERING - UNIT 1 FULL NOTES
CME 397 - SURFACE ENGINEERING - UNIT 1 FULL NOTES
 
11. Properties of Liquid Fuels in Energy Engineering.pdf
11. Properties of Liquid Fuels in Energy Engineering.pdf11. Properties of Liquid Fuels in Energy Engineering.pdf
11. Properties of Liquid Fuels in Energy Engineering.pdf
 
Robotics Group 10 (Control Schemes) cse.pdf
Robotics Group 10  (Control Schemes) cse.pdfRobotics Group 10  (Control Schemes) cse.pdf
Robotics Group 10 (Control Schemes) cse.pdf
 
Cost estimation approach: FP to COCOMO scenario based question
Cost estimation approach: FP to COCOMO scenario based questionCost estimation approach: FP to COCOMO scenario based question
Cost estimation approach: FP to COCOMO scenario based question
 

Prestress loss due to friction & anchorage take up

  • 1. PRESTRESSED CONCRETE FRICTION & ANCHORAGE TAKE-UP LOSS BY: AYAZ MALIK 1 / 13 FRICTION LOSSES (REF a, b, c & f) Consider an infinitesimal length dx of a prestressing tendon whose centroid follows the arc of a circle of radius R, then the change in angle of the tendon as it goes around the length dx is, dα = dxR FRICTIONAL LOSS dF ALONG THE LENGTH dx DUE TO CURVATURE FRICTION (Ref. a) For this infinitesimal length dx, the stress in the tendon may be considered constant & equal to P; then the normal component of pressure produced by the stress P bending around an angle dα is, N = Pdα = PdxR Let, μ be the coefficient of curvature friction & K, the wobble friction coefficient. The amount of frictional loss dP around the length dx is given by, dP = −μN = − μPdxR = −μPdα dPP =−μdα Integrating on both sides with limits P1 & P2, ∫ 1PdPP2P1=−∫μdα ln|P2| − ln|P1|=− μα ln| P2P1|=− μα eln| P2P1 | = e−μα P2 = P1e− μα If L is the length of the curve with constant radius R, then α = L/ R, P2 = P1e− μLR dx P – dP P R dα dP dα P – dP P N = Pdα
  • 2. PRESTRESSED CONCRETE FRICTION & ANCHORAGE TAKE-UP LOSS BY: AYAZ MALIK 2 / 13 The above equation gives the frictional loss due to curvature. This equation can also be applied to compute the frictional loss due to wobble or length effect by substituting the loss KL for μα, P2 = P1e− KL PRESTRESS LOSS DUE TO WOBBLE FRICTION (Ref. b) To combine the wobble & curvature effect, we can simply write, P2 = P1e− μα−KL Or dividing by tendon area, the above equation can be written in terms of unit stresses, f2 = f1e− μα−KL The friction loss is obtained from above expression. Loss of steel stress is given as FR = f1 – f2, where f1 is the steel stress at the jacking end & L is length to the point under consideration. Thus, FR = f1−f2=f1−f1e− μα−KL=f1(1−e− μα−KL) For tendons with a succession of curves of varying radii, it is necessary to apply this formula from section to section. The reduced stress at the end of a segment can be used to compute the frictional loss for the next segment. Since practically for all prestressed-concrete members, the depth is small compared with the length, the curve is relatively flat. The angular change α is approximately given by the transverse deviation of the tendon divided by the projected length, both referred to the member axis. APPROXIMATE DETERMINATION OF CENTRAL ANGLE FOR A TENDON (Ref. a) From the figure above, we have, tanα2 = mx/2 = 2mx m y α α/2 x x/2 Actual profile due to wobbling Intended profile Tendon supports α (Intended angle change)
  • 3. PRESTRESSED CONCRETE FRICTION & ANCHORAGE TAKE-UP LOSS BY: AYAZ MALIK 3 / 13 In above equation m is approximately equal to twice the sag y. Also, for small angles, the tangent of an angle is nearly equal to the angle itself, measured in radians. Therefore, α2 = 2(2y) x → α = 8yx (radians The value of y can be obtained from the arc geometry. Let R be the known radius of the arc, then using the Pythagoras’ theorem, we get, ( x2) 2+(R−y)2=R2 x24+R2+y2−2Ry−R2=0 y2−2Ry+ x24=0 Solving the above quadratic equation, y can be obtained, which can be used to find the value of α. Typical values of wobble friction coefficient & curvature friction coefficient are listed below. These values are taken from Ref. c. Type of Tendon & sheath Wobble Coefficient, K (per meter length x 10-3) Curvature Coefficient, μ Tendons in flexible metal sheathing Wire tendons 3.3 – 5.0 0.15 – 0.25 7 wire strands 1.6 – 6.5 0.15 – 0.25 High strength bars 0.3 – 2.0 0.08 – 0.30 Tendons in rigid metal sheath 7 wire strand 0.70 0.15 – 0.25 Pre-greased tendons Wire tendons & 7 wire strand 1.0 – 6.5 0.05 – 0.15 Mastic coated tendons Wire tendons & 7 wire strand 3.3 – 6.6 0.05 – 0.15 EXAMPLE 1 – FRICTIONAL LOSS A concrete beam, continuous over two spans is post-tensioned at both ends on a flat base. The prestress applied is 1500MPa. The modulus of elasticity of steel & concrete are 200000MPa & 33100 MPa respectively. The beam is prestressed using 7-wire strand. The idealized sections are shown below. Compute the percentage loss of prestress due to friction at middle support. IDEALIZED SECTION AT MID-SUPPORT αDE 3.5m 20m A B C D E 800mm 150mm 150mm αBC 5m 5m 3.5m 3m 400mm R = 50m R = 30m F
  • 4. PRESTRESSED CONCRETE FRICTION & ANCHORAGE TAKE-UP LOSS BY: AYAZ MALIK 4 / 13 SOLUTION Given Data: Wobble friction coefficient, K = 0.0018 m –1 Curvature friction coefficient, μ = 0.2 Jacking force, F1 = 1500 x 987.1 = 1480650 N Geometric Properties: Segment L (m) R (m) y2−2Ry+ L24=0 α = 8yL (radians) AB 3.5 0 - 0 BC 10.0 50 0.2506 0.2005 CD 3.5 0 - 0 DF 6.0 30 0.1504 0.200 DE 3.0 0.100 (αDF/2) Frictional Loss: To take into account the gradual reduction of stress from A towards E, the tendon is divided into 4 portions from A to E. The reduced prestress force obtained at the end of each segment is used as the starting stress for the next segment. Results are shown below in tabulated form. Segment L (m) KL μα e – KL – μα Reduced Force F1e – KL – μα (N) Remarks AB 3.5 0.0063 0.0000 0.9937 1471321.905 F1 = 1480650.000 N BC 10.0 0.0180 0.0401 0.9436 1388367.018 F1 = 1471351.227 N CD 3.5 0.0063 0.0000 0.9937 1379620.306 F1 = 1388367.018 N DE 3.0 0.0054 0.0200 0.9749 1344991.836 F1 = 1379620.306 N Total frictional loss from A to E = 1480650.000−1344991.8361480650 × 100 = 9.162 % ANCHORAGE TAKE-UP LOSS (REF. a, b, e & g) For most systems of posttensioning, when a tendon is tensioned to its full value, the jack is released & the prestress is transferred to the anchorage. The anchorage fixtures that are subject to stresses at this transfer will tend to deform, thus allowing the tendon to slacken slightly. Friction wedges employed to hold the wires will slip a little distance before the wires can be firmly gripped. The amount of slippage depends on the type of wedge & the stress in the wires, but it is typically between 3mm to 9mm. For direct bearing anchorages, the heads & nuts are subject to a slight deformation at the release of the jack. An average value for such deformations may be only about
  • 5. PRESTRESSED CONCRETE FRICTION & ANCHORAGE TAKE-UP LOSS BY: AYAZ MALIK 5 / 13 0.75mm. If long shims are required to hold the elongated wires in place, there will be a deformation in the shims at transfer of prestress. As an example, a shim 0.3m long may deform 0.25mm. Wide variation can occur & large anchorage “set” or “take-up” is possible due to the fact that the hard, smooth wires may not immediately grip the steel before it has slipped through. A general formula for computing the loss of prestress due to anchorage deformation Δa is Δfs = ΔaEsL where, Δa = Amount of slip L = Tendon length of the tendon Es = Elastic modulus of the prestressing steel The above equation is based on the assumption that the slip is uniformly distributed over the length of the tendon. This is approximately so for pretension, & may apply for posttensioning, if the tendon is well greased or encased in low-friction plastic sheathing, & if wobble & curvature are small. For many post-tensioned beams, however, the anchorage slip loss is mostly confined to a region close to the jacking anchorage. Distribution along the tendon is prevented by reverse friction as the tendon slips inward, & the steel stress throughout much of the tendon length may be unaffected by anchorage slip. PRESTRESS VARIATION BEFORE & AFTER ANCHORAGE (Ref. e & g) Referring to the figure above, curves OB and AB are both characterized by the frictional parameters of the prestressing system. Once these parameters are known together with the anchorage take-up distance a , the length b of the back sliding segment and the stress loss at any location can be calculated. The basic relationship for loss of prestress due to friction is, fx = foe−(μ α + K x)=foe−kx where, α = Angle change
  • 6. PRESTRESSED CONCRETE FRICTION & ANCHORAGE TAKE-UP LOSS BY: AYAZ MALIK 6 / 13 x = Distance between two points μ = Coefficient of friction K = Wobble coefficient k = Friction index From the figure above, the tendon stress before and after anchorage take-up is, respectively, f1 = foe−kx f2 = fbe− k(b − x)=foe−2kb ekx The area OAB is obtained by integration, ∫(f1−f2) bodx= 1kfo(1−e−kb) 2 Therefore, Esk Δafo=(1−e−kb) 2 Solving the equation for b, we get b = −( 1k) ln(1−√ Esk Δafo) The following equation gives the anchorage loss at the end of the beam where jacking force is applied, fo−fa = fo(1−e−2bk) To find anchorage loss at any point from the end of the beam, following equation is used, f1−f2 = foe− k x(1−e−2k(b − x)) where, x is the distance from jacking end to the point under consideration. For a location outside the anchorage length (x > b), the steel stress is not affected by the anchorage losses. For a location inside the anchorage length (x < b), loss due to both, friction & anchorage seating occurs & is given by the above equation. It should be remember that the above equation is valid only if b < le, where le is effective beam length or the maximum length available for distribution of anchorage seating losses; one half of the member length if tensioning is done from both ends simultaneously; length of the member if post-tensioning is done from one end only. The importance of anchorage slip also depends on the length of the member or casting bed. For very short tendons, anchorage set will produce high slip losses. For long tendons or casting beds, slip becomes insignificant. The above equations deal with tendon profiles in a single uniform curvature only.
  • 7. PRESTRESSED CONCRETE FRICTION & ANCHORAGE TAKE-UP LOSS BY: AYAZ MALIK 7 / 13 TWO-SEGMENT VARIATION (Ref. g) For cases where the back sliding takes place over several segments of different curvatures, the problem becomes a little more complicated. Consider the case where two segments with friction indices k1 and k2 are involved, as shown in the figure. Tendon stress before anchoring is, fx = foe−k1 x when 0 ≤ x ≤ b1 fx = foe−k1 b1 e−k2(x − b1) when b1 ≤ x ≤ b1+b After anchorage take-up losses, the tendon stress is, fx = foe−(2 k1 b1 + 2 k2 b)ek 2(x − b1) when 0 ≤ x ≤ b1 fx = foe−( k1 b1 + 2 k2 b)ek 2(x − b1) when b1 ≤ x ≤ b1+b Upon integration, the following equation is obtained, [ k1k2−(1−e−k1b1)](1−e−k2 b) 2+2(1−e−k1 b1)(1−e−k2 b)− 1e−k1 b1[ Ek1Δfo−(1−e−k1 b1) 2]=0 This is a quadratic equation in terms of the unknown parameter (1 – e –k2b). STRESS VERSUS TIME IN THE STRANDS OF A PRETENSIONED CONCRETE GIRDER (Ref. l)
  • 8. PRESTRESSED CONCRETE FRICTION & ANCHORAGE TAKE-UP LOSS BY: AYAZ MALIK 8 / 13 The figure above shows the losses that occur with time in the strands in a pretensioned concrete girder. By the end of this lecture only friction and anchorage seating loss, & elastic shortening have been discussed. Other losses, which are time-dependent losses such as creep, shrinkage and relaxation of steel, will be discussed in next lecture. EXAMPLE 2 – FRICTION & ANCHORAGE TAKE-UP LOSS A 12m long beam is posttensioned from one end. The tendon has a parabolic profile as shown in the figure with a constant curvature. Compute the percentage loss of prestress due to friction and anchorage take-up if the jacking stress is 1100 N/mm2. IDEALIZED SECTION AT MID-SECTION SOLUTION Given Data: Wobble friction coefficient, K = 0.004 m –1 Curvature friction coefficient, μ = 0.3 Amount of slip, Δa = 1.5 mm Tendon depression, y = 150 mm Therefore, k = μαx + K = 0.38(0.15)12⁄ 12 + 0.004 = 0.0065 per m Back-slip penetration Length: The length of back sliding is calculated using the following equation; b = −( 1k) ln(1−√ Esk Δafo)=−( 10.0065)ln(1−√ 200000(0.0065)(0.0015) 1100)=6.618 m Friction & Anchorage Take-Up Loss: The following equation gives the anchorage loss at the end of the beam where jacking force is applied, fo−fa = fo(1−e−2bk)=1100(1−e−2(6.618)(0.0065))=90.678 MPa To find anchorage loss at any point from the end of the beam, following equation is used, f1−f2 = foe− k x(1−e−2k(b − x)) 150mm L = 12m
  • 9. PRESTRESSED CONCRETE FRICTION & ANCHORAGE TAKE-UP LOSS BY: AYAZ MALIK 9 / 13 Where, f1 = foe−kx for 0≤x≤L (Before anchorage loss) f2 = fbe− k(b − x)=foe−2kb ekx for 0≤x≤b (After anchorage loss) These equations are used to generate a table showing loss of prestress due to friction (f1) and due to anchorage (f2). The results are plotted on the graph. x f1 f2 Friction loss, fo – f1 Anchorage loss, f1 – f2 m MPa MPa MPa MPa 0 1100.000 1009.322 0 90.678 2 1085.793 1022.529 7.127 63.264 4 1071.769 1035.908 28.231 35.860 6 1057.926 1049.463 42.074 8.463 b = 6.618 1053.686 1053.686 46.314 0.000 8 1044.262 - 55.738 - 10 1030.774 - 69.226 - 12 1017.461 - 82.539 - The above results show that the anchorage loss is significant near the jacking end of the beam and reduces to zero at distance b from the jacking end. Also, back slip takes place over more than half of the tendon. The total losses of prestress due to friction and anchorage are, Percentage loss of prestress due to friction = 82.5391100.000×100 = 7.504 % 1000 1020 1040 1060 1080 1100 1120 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 Prestress (MPa) Distance 'x' from the jacking end of the beam (m) PRESTRESS LOSS DUE TO FRICTION & ANCHORAGE f1 f2 fo – fa f1 – f2 le fo – f1
  • 10. PRESTRESSED CONCRETE FRICTION & ANCHORAGE TAKE-UP LOSS BY: AYAZ MALIK 10 / 13 Percentage loss of prestress due to anchorage = 90.6781100.000×100 = 8.243 % Note that the anchorage loss is calculated at the jacking end since it has maximum value at this location, while friction loss is calculated for the whole length of the tendon. EXAMPLE 3 – FRICTION & ANCHORAGE TAKE-UP LOSS – VARIABLE CURVATURE A 36m long beam is posttensioned from both ends. The tendon has a parabolic profile in the middle 30m, with a radius of 750m as shown in the figure. Tendon is straight in the 3m regions near each end. Compute the percentage loss of prestress due to friction and anchorage take-up if the jacking stress is 1200 N/mm2. SOLUTION Given Data: Wobble friction coefficient, K = 0.002 m –1 Curvature friction coefficient, μ = 0.30 Amount of slip, Δa = 1.50 mm b1 or L1 = 3.00 m L2 = 30.00 m R1 = 0 m R2 = 750.00 m Geometric Properties: Depression of the middle portion of the tendon can be calculated using the following equation y22−2R2y2+ L224=0 y22−2(750)y2+ (30)24=0 Solving the above quadratic equation, we get, y2=0.150 m Therefore, L1 R = 750m L2
  • 11. PRESTRESSED CONCRETE FRICTION & ANCHORAGE TAKE-UP LOSS BY: AYAZ MALIK 11 / 13 α1 = 0 α2 = 8y22L2 = 8(0.150) 2(30) = 0.02 radians k1 = μα1L1 + K = 0.303 + 0.002 = 0.0020 per m k2 = μα2L22⁄ + K = 0.30.02015 + 0.002 = 0.0024 per m Back-slip penetration Length: Assuming that the back-slip is restricted to the first segment, the maximum anchorage take-up is calculated using the following equation, Esk 1Δ1fo=(1−e−k1b1) 2 Solving the above equation we get, Δ1= [1−e−(0.002)(3)] 2(1200) 200000(0.002) =0.00011 m Since 1 is less than the specified anchorage take-up, back-slip penetrates beyond the first segment and equation for two segments has to be used to calculate the back-slip penetration length. The length of back sliding is calculated using the following equation; [ k1k2−(1−e−k1b1)](1−e−k2 b) 2+2(1−e−k1 b1)(1−e−k2 b)− 1e−k1 b1[ Ek1Δfo−(1−e−k1 b1) 2]=0 This equation is quadratic in terms of (1−e−k2 b). Solving the above equation yields, 1−e−k2 b=0.0176 b=7.400 m Friction & Anchorage Take-Up Loss: The following equations give the prestress loss before the anchorage loss occurs i.e., the loss is only due to friction, f1 = foe−k1 x when 0 ≤ x ≤ b1 f1 = foe−k1 b1 e−k2(x − b1) when b1 ≤ x ≤ b1+b After anchorage take-up losses, the tendon stress is given by the following equations, f2 = foe−(2 k1 b1 + 2 k2 b)ek 2(x − b1) when 0 ≤ x ≤ b1 f2 = foe−( k1 b1 + 2 k2 b)ek 2(x − b1) when b1 ≤ x ≤ b1+b These equations are used to generate a table showing loss of prestress due to friction (f1) and due to anchorage (f2). The results are plotted on the graph.
  • 12. PRESTRESSED CONCRETE FRICTION & ANCHORAGE TAKE-UP LOSS BY: AYAZ MALIK 12 / 13 x f1 f2 Friction loss, fo – f1 Anchorage loss, f1 – f2 m MPa MPa MPa MPa 0 1200.000 1136.098 0.000 63.902 1 1197.602 1138.828 2.398 58.774 2 1195.210 1141.565 4.790 53.645 b1 = 3 1192.822 1144.308 7.178 48.514 4 1189.962 1153.961 10.038 36.002 5 1187.110 1156.733 12.890 30.376 6 1184.264 1159.513 15.736 24.751 7 1181.425 1162.299 18.575 19.126 8 1178.593 1165.092 21.407 13.501 b + b1 = 10.4 1171.823 1171.823 28.177 0.000 12 1167.332 - 32.668 - 14 1161.743 - 38.257 - 16 1156.180 - 43.820 - 18 1150.643 - 49.357 - The total losses of prestress due to friction and anchorage are, 1120 1140 1160 1180 1200 1220 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 Prestress (MPa) Distance 'x' from the Jacking End of the Beam (m) PRESTRESS LOSS DUE TO FRICTION & ANCHORAGE f1 f2 f1 – f2 b1 b1 + b fo – f1
  • 13. PRESTRESSED CONCRETE FRICTION & ANCHORAGE TAKE-UP LOSS BY: AYAZ MALIK 13 / 13 Percentage loss of prestress due to friction = 49.3571200.000×100 = 4.113 % Percentage loss of prestress due to anchorage = 63.9021200.000×100 = 5.325 % Note that the anchorage loss is calculated at the jacking end since it has maximum value at this location, while friction loss is calculated for the half length of the tendon (Since jacking force is applied at both ends). REFERENCES a. T. Y. Lin, Ned H. Burns, “Design of Prestressed Concrete Structures”, 3rd Edition, 1981 b. Arthur H. Nilson, “Design of Prestressed Concrete”, 2nd Edition, 1987 c. Cement Association of Canada, “Concrete Design Handbook”, 3rd Edition, 2012 d. Canadian Standards Association, “CAN/CSA-A23.3-04–Design of Concrete Structures”, 2007 e. Ti Huang, Burt Hoffman, “Prediction of Prestress Losses in Posttensioned Members”, Department of Transportation, Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, 1978 f. Gail S. Kelly, “Prestress Losses in Posttensioned Structures”, PTI Technical Notes, 2000 g. Ti Huang, “Anchorage take-up loss in Posttensioned Members”, 1969 h. PCI, “Post-Tensioning Manual”, 1972 i. Maher K. Tadros, Nabil Al-Omaishi, Stephen J. Seguirant, James G. Gallt, “Prestress Losses in Pretensioned High-strength Concrete Bridge Girders”, NCHRP Report 496, 2003