1. Microservices: Detailed Guide
According to recent research by DZone, around 63% of
companies use microservices architectures. Companies were
using Monolithic architecture, but they moved to
Microservices with advancements in apps and the internet.
Let’s discuss everything about Microservices architecture and
its pros and cons:
What are Microservices?
Microservices architecture is a specific method of designing
software systems. It structures a single application as a
2. collection of loosely coupled services. It is easier to build
applications that break down into small pieces that work
together. Microservices are more about applying a certain
number of principles and architectural patterns. Each of these
microservices lives independently but also relies on each
other. All these microservices deploy in production at their
own pace, on-premise, or on the cloud.
Big companies like Facebook, Google, Netflix, etc., use it to
power their applications. Going further, let’s see the
Microservices architecture.
Microservices Architecture:
3. Microservices provides fine-grained services and lightweight
protocols to follow. It has plenty of other things except the
Microservices themselves.
● Identity Provider:
Manages the identity information and provides
authentication services within a distributed network.
● Service Discovery:
It is used to keep track of services, service addresses, and
endpoints.
● Static Content:
It stores static resources like pages and web content.
● Content Delivery Network (CDN):
It serves static resources like web pages, web content,
etc., in distributed networks.
● API Gateway:
It serves as the client’s entry point and is a single point of
contact for the client. In turn it returns aggregated
4. responses from underlying microservices.
● Management:
It is used to maintain the nodes of services.
Microservices architecture is used to build applications and
each of these has certain characteristics. They are:
● It fragments into many modular, loosely coupled
components, and each of them performs discrete
functions.
● These individual functions are useful to align with
business capabilities.
● You can distribute these apps among the cloud and data
centers.
● You can treat each function as an independent service
that you can change, update, and delete without
disrupting other applications.
Microservices Vs. Monolithic
What is Monolithic Architecture?
5. A single unit is used to build monolithic architecture. To build
enterprise applications, there are three parts:
● Database: consisting of many tables usually in relational
database management systems.
● Client-side user interface: consists of HTML pages or a
JavaScript running in a browser.
● Server-side application: it will handle HTTP requests,
execute domain-specific logic, retrieve and update data
from the database, and use the HTML views which it
sends to the browser.
It is a single logical executable service. To make any changes in
the system the developer needs to build and deploy an
updated version of the server-side application.
With monolithic service, there are certain drawbacks:
● It has limited reuse across monolithic applications.
● Scaling monolithic applications is challenging.
● You can develop it using only a single development stack.
What is Microservice:
6. Whereas, as discussed above, Microservices is a collection of
loosely coupled services. They are easier to build applications
that break down into small pieces and work together. The
following things set Microservices apart from Monolithic
services:
● Services are small, ideally built by a handful of developers.
● Other applications and services can consume and reuse
them via language bindings and other shared libraries.
● Services exist as independent deployment artifacts and
can scale independently.
People are opting for the latter one when it comes to constant
comparison between monolithic and microservices. If you are
thinking of developing an application, then the following are
major benefits and drawbacks of Microservices:
Advantages of Microservices:
Independent Development:
Microservices assigns to the single development team to
maintain it and developer can work independently. Small
teams can work in parallel and iterate faster than larger teams.
7. When a single service does not work better, the smaller team
can also scale the services independently without needing to
wait for a larger and complex team.
Isolation and Resilience:
Suppose one of the components fails due to outdated
technology or the inability to develop the code further. In that
case, developers can easily spin up another component while
the rest of the application can function independently. This
gives developers the freedom to develop and deploy services
as and when needed, without waiting on decisions about the
entire application.
Scalability:
Microservices are made of small components and can take up
fewer resources so they are easy to scale to meet the
increasing demand for that specific component. Microservices
can function even when there are large changes in size and
volume, which makes it ideal for enterprise applications that
are using a wide range of platforms and services.
Autonomous Development:
8. Compared to monolithic architecture, individual components
are easy to fit into continuous delivery. Only pinpointed
service needs modification and redeployment when a change
comes. If a service fails, others will continue to function
independently.
There are two major benefits:
● It enables scaling and development.
● Does not need much coordination between teams.
Disadvantages of Microservices:
Increased Complexity:
Microservices are complex and challenging to learn compared
to monolithic architectures. It is difficult to build new
solutions and is faulty as many engineers are not that familiar
with it. It is not the best solution for all applications, so you
will have to understand the business requirements and make
necessary changes.
Expensive:
9. They are costly and run in their own environments with their
own CPUs. They work with all API calls which are costly.
Additionally, the development environment is complex and
requires a team of experienced developers. As a result, it has
costly development.
Handling Data:
Handling data requests is one of the most difficult challenges
with Microservices as it spans multiple services and requires
constant updates to the data.
Whereas, in Monolith you can rely on ACID transactions to roll
back a database change if something goes wrong. With
microservices, there is much more complexity involved as it
uses distributed transactions across various services.
Conclusion:
Between the constant fight of Monolithic and Microservices,
the latter is better. Microservices architecture brings some
major advantages as it makes it easy to develop an application.
If you plan to develop an application and want to know which
architecture to follow, Microservices is your answer.
10. Despite the complex structure, it has changed the way we
develop applications. But, to develop an application using
Microservices, you will need an expert who can help you with
development. Hire asp.net developers from us who can help
you with app development. Our expert team of developers will
understand your requirements and help you to fulfill them.
Source:
https:/
/www.biztechcs.com/blog/detailed-guide-microservi
ces/