SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 12
Download to read offline
ENERGY CONSUMPTION ANALYSIS, RANKED BY STATE, 2004 Energy Information Administration
2004
RANKING
BY HIGH
INDUST
SECTOR
ENERGY
CONSUM
AS
PERCENT
OF TOTAL
CONSUM
(NOTE 1)
STATE
2004
RANKING
BY TOTAL
ENERGY
CONSUM
PER
CAPITA
2004
PERCENTAGE
OF
INDUSTRIAL
SECTOR
CONSUM OF
TOTAL
CONSUM
(NOTE 1)
(2000
CENSUS)
RANKING
IN POP
DENSITY
2004
RANKING
IN PER
CAPITA
MOTOR
GASOLINE
CONSUM
2004
RANKING IN
TOTAL
CONSUM BY
RESIDENTAL
SECTOR
(NOTE 2)
(LATEST INFO
AVAIL) TYPE
OF ENERGY
PRODUCTION
INDUSTRIES
(2006 NPRA
DATA)
NUMBER
OF
REFINERIE
S
2004
NUMBER
OF
NUCLEAR
POWER
PLANTS
(AS OF
2005)
PRIMARY
FUELS
FOR
ELECT
GEN
2004
RANKING
BY
LOWEST
RETAIL
ELECT
PRICE
(NOTE 3)
2004
RANKING
BY
PERCENT
OF MANUF
WORKERS
(NOTE 4)
2004
RANKING
BY
PERCENT
OF
WORKERS
IN SERVICE
JOBS
(NOTE 5)
2004
RANKING BY
PERCENT OF
WORKERS IN
BUSINESS
MANAGE AND
FINANCIAL
SECTOR
(NOTE 6)
2004
RANKING
BY
MEDIAN
AGE
(NOTE 7)
2004
RANKING
BY PER
CAPITA
PERSONAL
INCOME
(NOTE 8)
2004
RANKING
BY MEDIAN
MONTHLY
COST FOR
OWNER
OCCUPIED
HOUSING
(NOTE 9)
RANKING
BY
ECONOMY
GROWTH
(2004 TO
2005)
(NOTE 10)
1 LOUISIANA 3 63.3 23 24 22
OIL, NATURAL
GAS,
BIODIESEL,
NUCLEAR,
AND
PETROCHEM 18 2
NATURAL
GAS
(47.0%)
COAL
(24.9%)
NUCLEAR
(16.9%) 33 38 4 49 42 51 43 51
2 WYOMING 2 56.2 50 1 49
OIL, NATURAL
GAS,
URANIUM,
AND COAL 5 0
COAL
(95.1%) 3 48 20 24 10 15 30 9
3 TEXAS 5 53.5 29 16 2
OIL, NATURAL
GAS, COAL,
PETROCHEM,
URANIUM,
NUCLEAR,
ETHANOL,
BIODIESEL,
AND WIND
ENERGY 25 2
NATURAL
GAS
(49.4%)
COAL
(37.4%)
NUCLEAR
(9.6%) 37 28 18 29 50 28 41 17
4 ALASKA 1 50.5 51 31 47
OIL, NATURAL
GAS, AND
HYDROELECT 6 0
NATURAL
GAS
(56.6%)
HYDROE
(22.3%) 46 50 35 19 49 18 16 49
5 INDIANA 7 47.6 17 27 13
COAL,
ETHANOL,
BIODIESEL,
AND
PETROCHEM 2 0
COAL
(94.2%) 5 1 27 45 37 33 38 47
Page 1 of 12
ENERGY CONSUMPTION ANALYSIS, RANKED BY STATE, 2004 Energy Information Administration
2004
RANKING
BY HIGH
INDUST
SECTOR
ENERGY
CONSUM
AS
PERCENT
OF TOTAL
CONSUM
(NOTE 1)
STATE
2004
RANKING
BY TOTAL
ENERGY
CONSUM
PER
CAPITA
2004
PERCENTAGE
OF
INDUSTRIAL
SECTOR
CONSUM OF
TOTAL
CONSUM
(NOTE 1)
(2000
CENSUS)
RANKING
IN POP
DENSITY
2004
RANKING
IN PER
CAPITA
MOTOR
GASOLINE
CONSUM
2004
RANKING IN
TOTAL
CONSUM BY
RESIDENTAL
SECTOR
(NOTE 2)
(LATEST INFO
AVAIL) TYPE
OF ENERGY
PRODUCTION
INDUSTRIES
(2006 NPRA
DATA)
NUMBER
OF
REFINERIE
S
2004
NUMBER
OF
NUCLEAR
POWER
PLANTS
(AS OF
2005)
PRIMARY
FUELS
FOR
ELECT
GEN
2004
RANKING
BY
LOWEST
RETAIL
ELECT
PRICE
(NOTE 3)
2004
RANKING
BY
PERCENT
OF MANUF
WORKERS
(NOTE 4)
2004
RANKING
BY
PERCENT
OF
WORKERS
IN SERVICE
JOBS
(NOTE 5)
2004
RANKING BY
PERCENT OF
WORKERS IN
BUSINESS
MANAGE AND
FINANCIAL
SECTOR
(NOTE 6)
2004
RANKING
BY
MEDIAN
AGE
(NOTE 7)
2004
RANKING
BY PER
CAPITA
PERSONAL
INCOME
(NOTE 8)
2004
RANKING
BY MEDIAN
MONTHLY
COST FOR
OWNER
OCCUPIED
HOUSING
(NOTE 9)
RANKING
BY
ECONOMY
GROWTH
(2004 TO
2005)
(NOTE 10)
6 NORTH DAKOTA 4 46.7 48 8 45
OIL,
ETHANOL,
SYNFUELS,
WIND
POWER, AND
HYDROELECT 1 0
COAL
(94.8%) 7 42 16 7 9 35 48 13
7 ALABAMA 6 46.3 27 17 21
BIODIESEL,
HYDROELECT
, COAL, OIL,
NUCLEAR,
AND
PETROCHEM 4 3
COAL
(56.6%)
NUCLEAR
(23.0%)
NATURAL
GAS
(10.1%) 12 12 46 48 21 42 46 28
8 WEST VIRGINIA 9 44.1 30 41 34
COAL AND
PETROCHEM 1 0
COAL
(97.6%) 4 33 8 51 3 48 49 27
9 ARKANSAS 13 41.7 35 21 32
HYDROELECT
, NATURAL
GAS,
BIODIESEL,
NUCLEAR,
AND
PETROCHEM 2 1
COAL
(48.2%)
NUCLEAR
(28.6%)
NATURAL
GAS
(12.6%) 9 5 24 47 27 49 51 32
10 IOWA 15 41.2 34 7 30
ETHANOL,
BIODIESEL,
NUCLEAR,
AND WIND
ENERGY 0 1
COAL
(77.6%)
NUCLEAR
(10.3%) 18 8 45 26 11 29 44 40
11 SOUTH CAROLINA 14 38.6 22 3 24
BIODIESEL,
NUCLEAR,
AND
HYDROELECT 0 4
NUCLEAR
(51.8%)
COAL
(38.7%) 15 9 32 44 26 44 35 25
Page 2 of 12
ENERGY CONSUMPTION ANALYSIS, RANKED BY STATE, 2004 Energy Information Administration
2004
RANKING
BY HIGH
INDUST
SECTOR
ENERGY
CONSUM
AS
PERCENT
OF TOTAL
CONSUM
(NOTE 1)
STATE
2004
RANKING
BY TOTAL
ENERGY
CONSUM
PER
CAPITA
2004
PERCENTAGE
OF
INDUSTRIAL
SECTOR
CONSUM OF
TOTAL
CONSUM
(NOTE 1)
(2000
CENSUS)
RANKING
IN POP
DENSITY
2004
RANKING
IN PER
CAPITA
MOTOR
GASOLINE
CONSUM
2004
RANKING IN
TOTAL
CONSUM BY
RESIDENTAL
SECTOR
(NOTE 2)
(LATEST INFO
AVAIL) TYPE
OF ENERGY
PRODUCTION
INDUSTRIES
(2006 NPRA
DATA)
NUMBER
OF
REFINERIE
S
2004
NUMBER
OF
NUCLEAR
POWER
PLANTS
(AS OF
2005)
PRIMARY
FUELS
FOR
ELECT
GEN
2004
RANKING
BY
LOWEST
RETAIL
ELECT
PRICE
(NOTE 3)
2004
RANKING
BY
PERCENT
OF MANUF
WORKERS
(NOTE 4)
2004
RANKING
BY
PERCENT
OF
WORKERS
IN SERVICE
JOBS
(NOTE 5)
2004
RANKING BY
PERCENT OF
WORKERS IN
BUSINESS
MANAGE AND
FINANCIAL
SECTOR
(NOTE 6)
2004
RANKING
BY
MEDIAN
AGE
(NOTE 7)
2004
RANKING
BY PER
CAPITA
PERSONAL
INCOME
(NOTE 8)
2004
RANKING
BY MEDIAN
MONTHLY
COST FOR
OWNER
OCCUPIED
HOUSING
(NOTE 9)
RANKING
BY
ECONOMY
GROWTH
(2004 TO
2005)
(NOTE 10)
12 IDAHO 23 38.0 45 34 39 HYDROELECT 0 0
HYDROE
(78.9%)
NATURAL
GAS
(14.3%) 2 21 16 33 45 45 29 4
13 MONTANA 10 37.9 49 12 43
OIL, NATURAL
GAS, COAL,
WIND
POWER, AND
HYDROELECT 4 0
COAL
(63.8%)
HYDROE
(34.3%) 19 47 5 28 4 40 31 8
14 KENTUCKY 8 37.5 24 20 25
COAL,
BIODIESEL,
ETHANOL,
AND
HYROELECT 2 0
COAL
(91.1%) 1 7 34 46 19 43 42 33
15 OKLAHOMA 11 37.3 36 2 28
OIL, NATURAL
GAS,
PETROCHEM,
BIODIESEL,
HYDROELECT
, AND WIND
ENERGY 5 0
COAL
(53.0%)
NATURAL
GAS
(41.6%) 22 24 10 39 33 41 47 30
16 MISSISSIPPI 12 37.3 33 6 31
OIL, NATURAL
GAS,
BIODIESEL,
NUCLEAR
AND
PETROCHEM 4 1
COAL
(36.9%)
NATURAL
GAS
(34.1%)
NUCLEAR
(22.4%) 30 9 12 50 41 50 50 46
Page 3 of 12
ENERGY CONSUMPTION ANALYSIS, RANKED BY STATE, 2004 Energy Information Administration
2004
RANKING
BY HIGH
INDUST
SECTOR
ENERGY
CONSUM
AS
PERCENT
OF TOTAL
CONSUM
(NOTE 1)
STATE
2004
RANKING
BY TOTAL
ENERGY
CONSUM
PER
CAPITA
2004
PERCENTAGE
OF
INDUSTRIAL
SECTOR
CONSUM OF
TOTAL
CONSUM
(NOTE 1)
(2000
CENSUS)
RANKING
IN POP
DENSITY
2004
RANKING
IN PER
CAPITA
MOTOR
GASOLINE
CONSUM
2004
RANKING IN
TOTAL
CONSUM BY
RESIDENTAL
SECTOR
(NOTE 2)
(LATEST INFO
AVAIL) TYPE
OF ENERGY
PRODUCTION
INDUSTRIES
(2006 NPRA
DATA)
NUMBER
OF
REFINERIE
S
2004
NUMBER
OF
NUCLEAR
POWER
PLANTS
(AS OF
2005)
PRIMARY
FUELS
FOR
ELECT
GEN
2004
RANKING
BY
LOWEST
RETAIL
ELECT
PRICE
(NOTE 3)
2004
RANKING
BY
PERCENT
OF MANUF
WORKERS
(NOTE 4)
2004
RANKING
BY
PERCENT
OF
WORKERS
IN SERVICE
JOBS
(NOTE 5)
2004
RANKING BY
PERCENT OF
WORKERS IN
BUSINESS
MANAGE AND
FINANCIAL
SECTOR
(NOTE 6)
2004
RANKING
BY
MEDIAN
AGE
(NOTE 7)
2004
RANKING
BY PER
CAPITA
PERSONAL
INCOME
(NOTE 8)
2004
RANKING
BY MEDIAN
MONTHLY
COST FOR
OWNER
OCCUPIED
HOUSING
(NOTE 9)
RANKING
BY
ECONOMY
GROWTH
(2004 TO
2005)
(NOTE 10)
17 KANSAS 16 36.9 41 22 33
OIL, NATURAL
GAS,
NUCLEAR,
COAL,
ETHANOL,
BIODIESEL,
GEOTHERM,
AND WIND
ENERGY 3 1
COAL
(75.2%)
NUCLEAR
(19.2%) 17 23 29 23 38 26 40 19
18 WISCONSIN 28 36.6 25 37 19
NUCLEAR
BIODIESEL,
AND
ETHANOL 1 2
COAL
(67.4%)
NUCLEAR
(16.0%)
NATURAL
GAS
(10.3%) 25 3 44 32 17 21 26 39
19 DELAWARE 19 35.8 8 14 44
BIODIESEL
AND
PETROCHEM 1 0
COAL
(59.4%)
NATURAL
GAS
(19.6%)
FUEL OIL
(15.0%) 36 29 47 14 16 12 18 45
20 TENNESSEE 17 33.8 20 9 14
NUCLEAR,
BIODIESEL,
ETHANOL,
AND
HYDROELECT 1 2
COAL
(61.0%)
NUCLEAR
(28.6%)
HYDROE
(9.6%) 13 4 39 41 23 36 37 42
Page 4 of 12
ENERGY CONSUMPTION ANALYSIS, RANKED BY STATE, 2004 Energy Information Administration
2004
RANKING
BY HIGH
INDUST
SECTOR
ENERGY
CONSUM
AS
PERCENT
OF TOTAL
CONSUM
(NOTE 1)
STATE
2004
RANKING
BY TOTAL
ENERGY
CONSUM
PER
CAPITA
2004
PERCENTAGE
OF
INDUSTRIAL
SECTOR
CONSUM OF
TOTAL
CONSUM
(NOTE 1)
(2000
CENSUS)
RANKING
IN POP
DENSITY
2004
RANKING
IN PER
CAPITA
MOTOR
GASOLINE
CONSUM
2004
RANKING IN
TOTAL
CONSUM BY
RESIDENTAL
SECTOR
(NOTE 2)
(LATEST INFO
AVAIL) TYPE
OF ENERGY
PRODUCTION
INDUSTRIES
(2006 NPRA
DATA)
NUMBER
OF
REFINERIE
S
2004
NUMBER
OF
NUCLEAR
POWER
PLANTS
(AS OF
2005)
PRIMARY
FUELS
FOR
ELECT
GEN
2004
RANKING
BY
LOWEST
RETAIL
ELECT
PRICE
(NOTE 3)
2004
RANKING
BY
PERCENT
OF MANUF
WORKERS
(NOTE 4)
2004
RANKING
BY
PERCENT
OF
WORKERS
IN SERVICE
JOBS
(NOTE 5)
2004
RANKING BY
PERCENT OF
WORKERS IN
BUSINESS
MANAGE AND
FINANCIAL
SECTOR
(NOTE 6)
2004
RANKING
BY
MEDIAN
AGE
(NOTE 7)
2004
RANKING
BY PER
CAPITA
PERSONAL
INCOME
(NOTE 8)
2004
RANKING
BY MEDIAN
MONTHLY
COST FOR
OWNER
OCCUPIED
HOUSING
(NOTE 9)
RANKING
BY
ECONOMY
GROWTH
(2004 TO
2005)
(NOTE 10)
21 OHIO 25 33.8 10 36 7
COAL,
BIODIESEL,
ETHANOL,
NUCLEAR
AND
PETROCHEM 4 2
COAL
(87.2%)
NUCLEAR
(9.4%) 26 6 19 35 18 27 28 48
22 NEW MEXICO 21 33.4 46 23 40
OIL, NATURAL
GAS,
URANIUM,
AND WIND
ENERGY 3 0
COAL
(85.2%)
NATURAL
GAS
(11.9%) 31 46 3 40 35 47 36 12
23 PENNSLYLVANNIA 30 32.5 11 47 5
NUCLEAR,
OIL,
BIODIESEL,
AND COAL 5 5
COAL
(55.5%)
NUCLEAR
(35.0%) 38 14 32 34 5 19 34 36
24 MAINE 20 32.1 39 4 38
WOOD AND
HYDROELECT 0 0
NATURAL
GAS
(44.6%)
HYDROE
(21.7%)
RENEW
(21.6%) 41 30 11 42 1 32 25 43
25 ILLINOIS 34 31.6 12 46 6
NUCLEAR,
ETHANOL,
BIODIESEL,
COAL, AND
PETROCHEM 4 6
NUCLEAR
(48.0%)
COAL
(47.7%) 24 16 27 18 40 16 19 35
26 NEBRASKA 18 31.5 43 30 37
NUCLEAR,
BIODIESEL,
ETHANOL,
HYDROELECT
, AND WIND
ENERGY 0 2
COAL
(66.2%)
NUCLEAR
(28.0%) 6 36 25 10 34 23 39 41
Page 5 of 12
ENERGY CONSUMPTION ANALYSIS, RANKED BY STATE, 2004 Energy Information Administration
2004
RANKING
BY HIGH
INDUST
SECTOR
ENERGY
CONSUM
AS
PERCENT
OF TOTAL
CONSUM
(NOTE 1)
STATE
2004
RANKING
BY TOTAL
ENERGY
CONSUM
PER
CAPITA
2004
PERCENTAGE
OF
INDUSTRIAL
SECTOR
CONSUM OF
TOTAL
CONSUM
(NOTE 1)
(2000
CENSUS)
RANKING
IN POP
DENSITY
2004
RANKING
IN PER
CAPITA
MOTOR
GASOLINE
CONSUM
2004
RANKING IN
TOTAL
CONSUM BY
RESIDENTAL
SECTOR
(NOTE 2)
(LATEST INFO
AVAIL) TYPE
OF ENERGY
PRODUCTION
INDUSTRIES
(2006 NPRA
DATA)
NUMBER
OF
REFINERIE
S
2004
NUMBER
OF
NUCLEAR
POWER
PLANTS
(AS OF
2005)
PRIMARY
FUELS
FOR
ELECT
GEN
2004
RANKING
BY
LOWEST
RETAIL
ELECT
PRICE
(NOTE 3)
2004
RANKING
BY
PERCENT
OF MANUF
WORKERS
(NOTE 4)
2004
RANKING
BY
PERCENT
OF
WORKERS
IN SERVICE
JOBS
(NOTE 5)
2004
RANKING BY
PERCENT OF
WORKERS IN
BUSINESS
MANAGE AND
FINANCIAL
SECTOR
(NOTE 6)
2004
RANKING
BY
MEDIAN
AGE
(NOTE 7)
2004
RANKING
BY PER
CAPITA
PERSONAL
INCOME
(NOTE 8)
2004
RANKING
BY MEDIAN
MONTHLY
COST FOR
OWNER
OCCUPIED
HOUSING
(NOTE 9)
RANKING
BY
ECONOMY
GROWTH
(2004 TO
2005)
(NOTE 10)
27 GEORGIA 24 30.6 19 15 9
BIODIESEL
AND
NUCLEAR 1 2
COAL
(63.8%)
NUCLEAR
(23.1%) 23 18 48 17 48 34 27 11
28 MINNESOTA 22 30.6 32 18 20
BIODIESEL,
ETHANOL,
AND
NUCLEAR 2 2
COAL
(62.1%)
NUCLEAR
(24.2%) 17 13 42 11 31 10 15 44
29 UTAH 36 28.7 42 32 36
OIL, NATURAL
GAS,
URANIUM,
COAL, AND
GEOTHERM 5 0
COAL
(94.2%) 8 32 49 36 51 46 20 6
30 MICHIGAN 35 28.3 16 29 8
NUCLEAR,
ETHANOL,
BIODIESEL,
AND WOOD 1 3
COAL
(57.8%)
NUCLEAR
(27.0%)
NATURAL
GAS
(11.2%) 27 2 14 38 30 25 24 50
31 WASHINGTON 31 27.9 26 43 16
NUCLEAR,
HYDROELECT
, BIODIESEL,
AND
PETROCHEM 5 2
HYDROE
(70.7%)
COAL
(10.3%)
NATURAL
GAS
(8.4%) 10 31 26 16 32 17 12 21
32 OREGON 37 27.5 40 44 29
ETHANOL,
BIODIESEL,
AND
HYDROELECT 1 0
HYDROE
(62.7%)
NATURAL
GAS
(26.7%) 14 17 23 31 28 30 14 5
Page 6 of 12
ENERGY CONSUMPTION ANALYSIS, RANKED BY STATE, 2004 Energy Information Administration
2004
RANKING
BY HIGH
INDUST
SECTOR
ENERGY
CONSUM
AS
PERCENT
OF TOTAL
CONSUM
(NOTE 1)
STATE
2004
RANKING
BY TOTAL
ENERGY
CONSUM
PER
CAPITA
2004
PERCENTAGE
OF
INDUSTRIAL
SECTOR
CONSUM OF
TOTAL
CONSUM
(NOTE 1)
(2000
CENSUS)
RANKING
IN POP
DENSITY
2004
RANKING
IN PER
CAPITA
MOTOR
GASOLINE
CONSUM
2004
RANKING IN
TOTAL
CONSUM BY
RESIDENTAL
SECTOR
(NOTE 2)
(LATEST INFO
AVAIL) TYPE
OF ENERGY
PRODUCTION
INDUSTRIES
(2006 NPRA
DATA)
NUMBER
OF
REFINERIE
S
2004
NUMBER
OF
NUCLEAR
POWER
PLANTS
(AS OF
2005)
PRIMARY
FUELS
FOR
ELECT
GEN
2004
RANKING
BY
LOWEST
RETAIL
ELECT
PRICE
(NOTE 3)
2004
RANKING
BY
PERCENT
OF MANUF
WORKERS
(NOTE 4)
2004
RANKING
BY
PERCENT
OF
WORKERS
IN SERVICE
JOBS
(NOTE 5)
2004
RANKING BY
PERCENT OF
WORKERS IN
BUSINESS
MANAGE AND
FINANCIAL
SECTOR
(NOTE 6)
2004
RANKING
BY
MEDIAN
AGE
(NOTE 7)
2004
RANKING
BY PER
CAPITA
PERSONAL
INCOME
(NOTE 8)
2004
RANKING
BY MEDIAN
MONTHLY
COST FOR
OWNER
OCCUPIED
HOUSING
(NOTE 9)
RANKING
BY
ECONOMY
GROWTH
(2004 TO
2005)
(NOTE 10)
33 COLORADO 39 26.9 38 41 26
OIL, NATURAL
GAS,
ETHANOL,
BIODIESEL,
URANIUM,
AND COAL 2 0
COAL
(71.7%)
NATURAL
GAS
(24.0%) 29 40 37 5 44 9 11 18
34 NEVADA 40 26.8 44 49 35
BIODIESEL,
HYDROELECT
, URANIUM
AND
GEOTHERM 1 0
NATURAL
GAS
(46.6%)
COAL
(45.7%) 40 45 1 42 43 13 13 2
35 NORTH CAROLINA 33 26.6 18 25 10
BIODIESEL,
NUCLEAR,
AND
HYDROELECT 0 3
COAL
(60.5%)
NUCLEAR
(30.8%) 28 11 31 37 35 38 32 20
36 CALIFORNIA 49 24.6 12 45 1
OIL,
PETROCHEM,
HYDROELECT
, ETHANOL,
BIODIESEL,
NUCLEAR,
AND
GEOTHERM 21 2
NATURAL
GAS
(46.7%)
HYROE
(19.8%)
NUCLEAR
(18.1%) 49 27 21 13 47 11 1 16
37 MARYLAND 41 24.1 6 38 18
BIODIESEL
AND
NUCLEAR 0 1
COAL
(55.7%)
NUCLEAR
(27.9%) 32 44 41 3 25 5 10 22
Page 7 of 12
ENERGY CONSUMPTION ANALYSIS, RANKED BY STATE, 2004 Energy Information Administration
2004
RANKING
BY HIGH
INDUST
SECTOR
ENERGY
CONSUM
AS
PERCENT
OF TOTAL
CONSUM
(NOTE 1)
STATE
2004
RANKING
BY TOTAL
ENERGY
CONSUM
PER
CAPITA
2004
PERCENTAGE
OF
INDUSTRIAL
SECTOR
CONSUM OF
TOTAL
CONSUM
(NOTE 1)
(2000
CENSUS)
RANKING
IN POP
DENSITY
2004
RANKING
IN PER
CAPITA
MOTOR
GASOLINE
CONSUM
2004
RANKING IN
TOTAL
CONSUM BY
RESIDENTAL
SECTOR
(NOTE 2)
(LATEST INFO
AVAIL) TYPE
OF ENERGY
PRODUCTION
INDUSTRIES
(2006 NPRA
DATA)
NUMBER
OF
REFINERIE
S
2004
NUMBER
OF
NUCLEAR
POWER
PLANTS
(AS OF
2005)
PRIMARY
FUELS
FOR
ELECT
GEN
2004
RANKING
BY
LOWEST
RETAIL
ELECT
PRICE
(NOTE 3)
2004
RANKING
BY
PERCENT
OF MANUF
WORKERS
(NOTE 4)
2004
RANKING
BY
PERCENT
OF
WORKERS
IN SERVICE
JOBS
(NOTE 5)
2004
RANKING BY
PERCENT OF
WORKERS IN
BUSINESS
MANAGE AND
FINANCIAL
SECTOR
(NOTE 6)
2004
RANKING
BY
MEDIAN
AGE
(NOTE 7)
2004
RANKING
BY PER
CAPITA
PERSONAL
INCOME
(NOTE 8)
2004
RANKING
BY MEDIAN
MONTHLY
COST FOR
OWNER
OCCUPIED
HOUSING
(NOTE 9)
RANKING
BY
ECONOMY
GROWTH
(2004 TO
2005)
(NOTE 10)
38 SOUTH DAKOTA 27 24.0 47 5 46
BIODIESEL,
ETHANOL,
WIND
ENERGY,
AND
HYDROELECT 0 0
HYDROE
(47.2%)
COAL
(46.0%) 20 37 17 9 29 37 45 24
39 VIRGINIA 26 23.1 15 19 12
BIODIESEL,
NUCLEAR,
COAL, AND
HYDROELECT 0 2
COAL
(44.9%)
NUCLEAR
(35.4%)
NATURAL
GAS
(10.5%) 21 35 50 4 24 8 17 7
40 HAWAII 45 21.4 14 50 51
BIODIESEL
AND
ETHANOL 2 0
FUEL OIL
(78.8%)
COAL
(14.2%) 51 49 2 25 12 20 2 10
41 MISSOURI 32 21.1 28 10 15
NUCLEAR,
HYDROELECT
, BIODIESEL,
AND
ETHANOL 0 1
COAL
(85.3%)
NUCLEAR
(8.8%) 11 21 22 30 22 31 33 34
42 VERMONT 42 18.6 31 11 48
NUCLEAR
AND
HYDROELECT 0 1
NUCLEAR
(71.2%)
HYDROE
(21.2%) 47 25 30 15 2 24 21 29
43 NEW JERSEY 38 18.4 2 28 11
BIODIESEL,
NUCLEAR,
AND
PETROCHEM 6 3
NUCLEAR
(51.8%)
NATURAL
GAS
(25.1%)
COAL
(19.2%) 43 34 43 6 15 4 5 37
Page 8 of 12
ENERGY CONSUMPTION ANALYSIS, RANKED BY STATE, 2004 Energy Information Administration
2004
RANKING
BY HIGH
INDUST
SECTOR
ENERGY
CONSUM
AS
PERCENT
OF TOTAL
CONSUM
(NOTE 1)
STATE
2004
RANKING
BY TOTAL
ENERGY
CONSUM
PER
CAPITA
2004
PERCENTAGE
OF
INDUSTRIAL
SECTOR
CONSUM OF
TOTAL
CONSUM
(NOTE 1)
(2000
CENSUS)
RANKING
IN POP
DENSITY
2004
RANKING
IN PER
CAPITA
MOTOR
GASOLINE
CONSUM
2004
RANKING IN
TOTAL
CONSUM BY
RESIDENTAL
SECTOR
(NOTE 2)
(LATEST INFO
AVAIL) TYPE
OF ENERGY
PRODUCTION
INDUSTRIES
(2006 NPRA
DATA)
NUMBER
OF
REFINERIE
S
2004
NUMBER
OF
NUCLEAR
POWER
PLANTS
(AS OF
2005)
PRIMARY
FUELS
FOR
ELECT
GEN
2004
RANKING
BY
LOWEST
RETAIL
ELECT
PRICE
(NOTE 3)
2004
RANKING
BY
PERCENT
OF MANUF
WORKERS
(NOTE 4)
2004
RANKING
BY
PERCENT
OF
WORKERS
IN SERVICE
JOBS
(NOTE 5)
2004
RANKING BY
PERCENT OF
WORKERS IN
BUSINESS
MANAGE AND
FINANCIAL
SECTOR
(NOTE 6)
2004
RANKING
BY
MEDIAN
AGE
(NOTE 7)
2004
RANKING
BY PER
CAPITA
PERSONAL
INCOME
(NOTE 8)
2004
RANKING
BY MEDIAN
MONTHLY
COST FOR
OWNER
OCCUPIED
HOUSING
(NOTE 9)
RANKING
BY
ECONOMY
GROWTH
(2004 TO
2005)
(NOTE 10)
44 RHODE ISLAND 51 17.8 3 35 42 BIODIESEL 0 0
NATURAL
GAS
(99.0%) 45 20 13 22 13 14 6 38
45 NEW HAMPSHIRE 44 16.5 21 13 41
NUCLEAR
AND
HYDROELECT 0 1
NUCLEAR
(38.6%)
NATURAL
GAS
(27.7%)
COAL
(16.6%) 48 15 51 12 7 7 9 15
46 ARIZONA 47 16.1 37 48 23
HYDROELECT
, COAL,
URANIUM,
AND
NUCLEAR 0 1
COAL
(39.6%)
NATURAL
GAS
(28.5%)
NUCLEAR
(25.4%) 34 39 9 20 46 39 23 1
47 CONNECTICUT 43 13.3 5 40 27
BIODIESEL
AND
NUCLEAR 0 1
NUCLEAR
(46.4%)
NATURAL
GAS
(26.4%)
COAL
(11.9%)
FUEL OIL
(9.4%) 42 18 38 2 7 2 7 23
Page 9 of 12
ENERGY CONSUMPTION ANALYSIS, RANKED BY STATE, 2004 Energy Information Administration
2004
RANKING
BY HIGH
INDUST
SECTOR
ENERGY
CONSUM
AS
PERCENT
OF TOTAL
CONSUM
(NOTE 1)
STATE
2004
RANKING
BY TOTAL
ENERGY
CONSUM
PER
CAPITA
2004
PERCENTAGE
OF
INDUSTRIAL
SECTOR
CONSUM OF
TOTAL
CONSUM
(NOTE 1)
(2000
CENSUS)
RANKING
IN POP
DENSITY
2004
RANKING
IN PER
CAPITA
MOTOR
GASOLINE
CONSUM
2004
RANKING IN
TOTAL
CONSUM BY
RESIDENTAL
SECTOR
(NOTE 2)
(LATEST INFO
AVAIL) TYPE
OF ENERGY
PRODUCTION
INDUSTRIES
(2006 NPRA
DATA)
NUMBER
OF
REFINERIE
S
2004
NUMBER
OF
NUCLEAR
POWER
PLANTS
(AS OF
2005)
PRIMARY
FUELS
FOR
ELECT
GEN
2004
RANKING
BY
LOWEST
RETAIL
ELECT
PRICE
(NOTE 3)
2004
RANKING
BY
PERCENT
OF MANUF
WORKERS
(NOTE 4)
2004
RANKING
BY
PERCENT
OF
WORKERS
IN SERVICE
JOBS
(NOTE 5)
2004
RANKING BY
PERCENT OF
WORKERS IN
BUSINESS
MANAGE AND
FINANCIAL
SECTOR
(NOTE 6)
2004
RANKING
BY
MEDIAN
AGE
(NOTE 7)
2004
RANKING
BY PER
CAPITA
PERSONAL
INCOME
(NOTE 8)
2004
RANKING
BY MEDIAN
MONTHLY
COST FOR
OWNER
OCCUPIED
HOUSING
(NOTE 9)
RANKING
BY
ECONOMY
GROWTH
(2004 TO
2005)
(NOTE 10)
48 MASSACHUSETTS 48 13.3 4 33 17 NUCLEAR 0 1
NATURAL
GAS
(42.7%)
COAL
(25.3%)
FUEL OIL
(15.0%)
NUCLEAR
(11.5%) 44 26 36 8 14 3 4 31
49 NEW YORK 50 12.6 7 50 4
BIODIESEL,
HYDROELECT
, AND
NUCLEAR 0 4
NUCLEAR
(28.9%)
NATURAL
GAS
(21.7%)
HYDROE
(17.6%)
FUEL OIL
(16.4%) 50 41 7 21 20 6 8 26
50 FLORIDA 46 12.4 9 26 3
BIODIESEL
AND
NUCLEAR 0 2
NATURAL
GAS
(38.0%)
COAL
(28.4%)
FUEL OIL
(16.9%)
NUCLEAR
(13.1%) 39 43 6 27 6 22 22 3
51 WASHINGTON DC 29 0.2 1 51 50 "HOT AIR" 0 0
FUEL OIL
(100%) 35 51 40 1 39 1 3 14
UNITED STATES
AVERAGE 33.0% 31.7 148 66 12.1% 16.3% 13.6% 36.4 $33,847 $151,366 3.4%
US VIRGIN
ISLANDS 1 (Owned jointly by Hess Co. and PDV (Venezuela's National Oil Co.)
Page 10 of 12
ENERGY CONSUMPTION ANALYSIS, RANKED BY STATE, 2004 Energy Information Administration
2004
RANKING
BY HIGH
INDUST
SECTOR
ENERGY
CONSUM
AS
PERCENT
OF TOTAL
CONSUM
(NOTE 1)
STATE
2004
RANKING
BY TOTAL
ENERGY
CONSUM
PER
CAPITA
2004
PERCENTAGE
OF
INDUSTRIAL
SECTOR
CONSUM OF
TOTAL
CONSUM
(NOTE 1)
(2000
CENSUS)
RANKING
IN POP
DENSITY
2004
RANKING
IN PER
CAPITA
MOTOR
GASOLINE
CONSUM
2004
RANKING IN
TOTAL
CONSUM BY
RESIDENTAL
SECTOR
(NOTE 2)
(LATEST INFO
AVAIL) TYPE
OF ENERGY
PRODUCTION
INDUSTRIES
(2006 NPRA
DATA)
NUMBER
OF
REFINERIE
S
2004
NUMBER
OF
NUCLEAR
POWER
PLANTS
(AS OF
2005)
PRIMARY
FUELS
FOR
ELECT
GEN
2004
RANKING
BY
LOWEST
RETAIL
ELECT
PRICE
(NOTE 3)
2004
RANKING
BY
PERCENT
OF MANUF
WORKERS
(NOTE 4)
2004
RANKING
BY
PERCENT
OF
WORKERS
IN SERVICE
JOBS
(NOTE 5)
2004
RANKING BY
PERCENT OF
WORKERS IN
BUSINESS
MANAGE AND
FINANCIAL
SECTOR
(NOTE 6)
2004
RANKING
BY
MEDIAN
AGE
(NOTE 7)
2004
RANKING
BY PER
CAPITA
PERSONAL
INCOME
(NOTE 8)
2004
RANKING
BY MEDIAN
MONTHLY
COST FOR
OWNER
OCCUPIED
HOUSING
(NOTE 9)
RANKING
BY
ECONOMY
GROWTH
(2004 TO
2005)
(NOTE 10)
PUERTO RICO 1
ENERGY
CONSUM
RANKING STATE
TOTAL
ENERGY
(TRILLIO
N BTU
2005)
PER
CAPITA
CONSUMP
RANKING
1 TEXAS 11971.4 PEOPLE + INDUSTRY 5 VERY HIGH LEVEL OF ENERGY INTENSIVE MANUFACTURING BUT ALSO A LOT OF PEOPLE
2 CALIFORNIA 8364.6 PEOPLE + INDUSTRY 49 SO CALLED ENERGY EFFICIENT STATE IS A LARGE ENERGY CONSUMER STATE DUE TO LARGE POPULATION!
3 FLORIDA 4452.5 PEOPLE 46 SO CALLED ENERGY EFFICIENT STATE IS A LARGE ENERGY CONSUMER STATE DUE TO LARGE POPULATION!
4 NEW YORK 4254.0 PEOPLE 50 SO CALLED ENERGY EFFICIENT STATE IS A LARGE ENERGY CONSUMER STATE DUE TO LARGE POPULATION!
5 PENNSYLVANIA 4049.4 PEOPLE + INDUSTRY 30 SO CALLED ENERGY EFFICIENT STATE IS A LARGE ENERGY CONSUMER STATE DUE TO LARGE POPULATION!
6 OHIO 4022.8 PEOPLE + INDUSTRY 25
7 ILLINOIS 3960.5 PEOPLE + INDUSTRY 34 SO CALLED ENERGY EFFICIENT STATE IS A LARGE ENERGY CONSUMER STATE DUE TO LARGE POPULATION!
8 LOUISIANA 3816.3 PETROCHEMICAL INDUSTRY 3 VERY HIGH LEVEL OF ENERGY INTENSIVE MANUFACTURING
9 GEORGIA 3141.1 PEOPLE + INDUSTRY 24
10 MICHIGAN 3119.4 PEOPLE + INDUSTRY 35 SO CALLED ENERGY EFFICIENT STATE IS A LARGE ENERGY CONSUMER STATE DUE TO LARGE POPULATION!
NOTE 1: Highest rankings have the greatest energy consumption by the industrial sector as a percentage of total energy consumption making them the most industrialized areas in the United States.
TEN LARGEST CONSUMERS OF ENERGY IN THE UNITED STATES - PEOPLE ARE THE PROBLEM, NOT INDUSTRY!
MAIN REASON FOR ENERGY CONSUMPTION
NOTE 2: Highest rankings have greatest energy consumption by the residental sector as a percentage of total energy consumption making them the least industrialized areas of the United States. The least
industrialized areas are occupied by the least productive in the energy and manufacturing areas and are red.
Industrial sector: An energy-consuming sector that consists of all facilities and equipment used for producing, processing, or assembling goods. The industrial sector encompasses the following types of activity:
manufacturing (NAICS codes 31-33); agriculture, forestry, fishing and hunting (NAICS code 11); mining, including oil and gas extraction (NAICS code 21); and construction (NAICS code 23). Overall energy use in this
sector is largely for process heat and cooling and powering machinery, with lesser amounts used for facility heating, air conditioning, and lighting. Fossil fuels are also used as raw material inputs to manufactured
products. Note: This sector includes generators that produce electricity and/or useful thermal output primarily to support the above-mentioned industrial activities.
Page 11 of 12
ENERGY CONSUMPTION ANALYSIS, RANKED BY STATE, 2004 Energy Information Administration
2004
RANKING
BY HIGH
INDUST
SECTOR
ENERGY
CONSUM
AS
PERCENT
OF TOTAL
CONSUM
(NOTE 1)
STATE
2004
RANKING
BY TOTAL
ENERGY
CONSUM
PER
CAPITA
2004
PERCENTAGE
OF
INDUSTRIAL
SECTOR
CONSUM OF
TOTAL
CONSUM
(NOTE 1)
(2000
CENSUS)
RANKING
IN POP
DENSITY
2004
RANKING
IN PER
CAPITA
MOTOR
GASOLINE
CONSUM
2004
RANKING IN
TOTAL
CONSUM BY
RESIDENTAL
SECTOR
(NOTE 2)
(LATEST INFO
AVAIL) TYPE
OF ENERGY
PRODUCTION
INDUSTRIES
(2006 NPRA
DATA)
NUMBER
OF
REFINERIE
S
2004
NUMBER
OF
NUCLEAR
POWER
PLANTS
(AS OF
2005)
PRIMARY
FUELS
FOR
ELECT
GEN
2004
RANKING
BY
LOWEST
RETAIL
ELECT
PRICE
(NOTE 3)
2004
RANKING
BY
PERCENT
OF MANUF
WORKERS
(NOTE 4)
2004
RANKING
BY
PERCENT
OF
WORKERS
IN SERVICE
JOBS
(NOTE 5)
2004
RANKING BY
PERCENT OF
WORKERS IN
BUSINESS
MANAGE AND
FINANCIAL
SECTOR
(NOTE 6)
2004
RANKING
BY
MEDIAN
AGE
(NOTE 7)
2004
RANKING
BY PER
CAPITA
PERSONAL
INCOME
(NOTE 8)
2004
RANKING
BY MEDIAN
MONTHLY
COST FOR
OWNER
OCCUPIED
HOUSING
(NOTE 9)
RANKING
BY
ECONOMY
GROWTH
(2004 TO
2005)
(NOTE 10)
NOTE 5: 2004 American Community Survey: Highest rankings have highest percentage of service workers. Service workers generally do not produce any products; therefore, highest rankings are red.
BLUE = ABOVE AVERAGE ENERGY USE EFFICIENCY STATISTIC (TOP 15)
RED = BELOW AVERAGE ENERGY USE EFFICIENCY STATISTIC (LOWEST 15)
ORANGE = MATT SIMMONS NEW ENGLAND STATES WITH LITTLE OR NO FOSSIL FUEL ENERGY RESOURCES + HAWAII
VIOLET = MATT SIMMONS ENERGY PARASITE STATES + DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA (Revised based on % industrial sector consumption data)
DARK BLUE = ENERGY EFFICIENT STATE WITH LITTLE OR NO FOSSIL FUEL RESOURCES BUT NOT CONSUMING ALOT OF GASOLINE OR NATURAL GAS ON A PER CAPITA BASIS
NOTE 10: 2004 Census Bureau data. Highest rankings have the highest economic growth rates. These areas are the areas generally people are moving to and are the areas where energy consumption is increasing,
usually residential energy consumption. The highest rankings are red.
NOTE 4: 2004 American Community Survey : Highest rankings have the highest percentage of manufacturing workers. Manufacturing workers produce chemicals, energy resources, food, and products in general:
therefore, highest rankings are blue.
NOTE 6: 2004 American Community Survey: Highest rankings have highest percentage of business, management, and financial sector workers. These workers generally produce few products; therefore, highest
rankings are red.
NOTE 9: 2004 Census Bureau data. Highest rankings have the highest median monthly cost for owner-occupied housing. Those areas are ususally the areas with highest population density, highest electricity cost,
highest per capita income, the highest median age populations, and usually the least amount industrial activity; therefore, the highest rankings are red.
NOTE 3: Highest rankings have the lowest retail electricity prices. Highest ranks usually mean that the cost of producing the electricity is lower than the average; therefore, highest rankings are blue.
NOTE 7: 2004 Census Bureau data. Highest rankings have the highest median age. Older workers are less productive than younger workers; therefore, highest rankings are red.
NOTE 8: 2004 Census Bureau data. Highest rankings have the highest per capital personal income. Those areas with the highest personal per capita income are usually the areas that personally consume the
largest amounts of energy; therfore, the highest rankings are red.
Page 12 of 12

More Related Content

Viewers also liked (9)

ΠΌΠ΅Ρ…Π°Π½ΠΈΠ·ΠΈΡ€ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½Π½Ρ‹Π΅ ΠΏΠ°Ρ‚Ρ€ΠΎΠ½Ρ‹ 1
ΠΌΠ΅Ρ…Π°Π½ΠΈΠ·ΠΈΡ€ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½Π½Ρ‹Π΅ ΠΏΠ°Ρ‚Ρ€ΠΎΠ½Ρ‹ 1ΠΌΠ΅Ρ…Π°Π½ΠΈΠ·ΠΈΡ€ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½Π½Ρ‹Π΅ ΠΏΠ°Ρ‚Ρ€ΠΎΠ½Ρ‹ 1
ΠΌΠ΅Ρ…Π°Π½ΠΈΠ·ΠΈΡ€ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½Π½Ρ‹Π΅ ΠΏΠ°Ρ‚Ρ€ΠΎΠ½Ρ‹ 1
Β 
CHOWDHURY, Liam An Investigation into the Information System Implications Whe...
CHOWDHURY, Liam An Investigation into the Information System Implications Whe...CHOWDHURY, Liam An Investigation into the Information System Implications Whe...
CHOWDHURY, Liam An Investigation into the Information System Implications Whe...
Β 
ΠŸΡ€ΠΎΠ΅ΠΊΡ‚ відкриття Ρ‚Π΅ΠΏΠ»ΠΈΡ‡Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ господарства
ΠŸΡ€ΠΎΠ΅ΠΊΡ‚ відкриття Ρ‚Π΅ΠΏΠ»ΠΈΡ‡Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ господарства ΠŸΡ€ΠΎΠ΅ΠΊΡ‚ відкриття Ρ‚Π΅ΠΏΠ»ΠΈΡ‡Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ господарства
ΠŸΡ€ΠΎΠ΅ΠΊΡ‚ відкриття Ρ‚Π΅ΠΏΠ»ΠΈΡ‡Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ господарства
Β 
Reference area
Reference areaReference area
Reference area
Β 
Groundhog day[1]
Groundhog day[1]Groundhog day[1]
Groundhog day[1]
Β 
Ap mar scene_v2
Ap mar scene_v2Ap mar scene_v2
Ap mar scene_v2
Β 
Mapping our Trail and Finding our Way in Web 2.0
Mapping our Trail and Finding our Way in Web 2.0Mapping our Trail and Finding our Way in Web 2.0
Mapping our Trail and Finding our Way in Web 2.0
Β 
Us downgrade
Us downgradeUs downgrade
Us downgrade
Β 
3. pathways 1 introduction
3. pathways 1 introduction3. pathways 1 introduction
3. pathways 1 introduction
Β 

Similar to US Energy Consumption by State as of 2005

Giancarlo Aquilanti
Giancarlo AquilantiGiancarlo Aquilanti
Giancarlo Aquilanti
Blogactiv
Β 
Electricity: Global Industry Guide
Electricity: Global Industry GuideElectricity: Global Industry Guide
Electricity: Global Industry Guide
ReportLinker.com
Β 
Energy policy 20120725
Energy policy 20120725Energy policy 20120725
Energy policy 20120725
yusangchang
Β 
International ETS Comparison
International ETS Comparison International ETS Comparison
International ETS Comparison
brunogerrits
Β 
USC - John Bryan Energy Storage v2
USC - John Bryan Energy Storage v2USC - John Bryan Energy Storage v2
USC - John Bryan Energy Storage v2
John Bryan
Β 

Similar to US Energy Consumption by State as of 2005 (20)

Republican Leaning States With Resources
Republican Leaning States With ResourcesRepublican Leaning States With Resources
Republican Leaning States With Resources
Β 
Electronic Waste Recovery: Global Markets
Electronic Waste Recovery: Global MarketsElectronic Waste Recovery: Global Markets
Electronic Waste Recovery: Global Markets
Β 
Bur malaysia final
Bur malaysia finalBur malaysia final
Bur malaysia final
Β 
HVAC and CLIMATE CHANGE
HVAC and CLIMATE CHANGEHVAC and CLIMATE CHANGE
HVAC and CLIMATE CHANGE
Β 
Power point energy in argentina
Power point energy in argentinaPower point energy in argentina
Power point energy in argentina
Β 
Linking the energy crisis with climate change, Ritu Mathu, TERI University, I...
Linking the energy crisis with climate change, Ritu Mathu, TERI University, I...Linking the energy crisis with climate change, Ritu Mathu, TERI University, I...
Linking the energy crisis with climate change, Ritu Mathu, TERI University, I...
Β 
Afghanistan_Asia_RE_SP.pdf
Afghanistan_Asia_RE_SP.pdfAfghanistan_Asia_RE_SP.pdf
Afghanistan_Asia_RE_SP.pdf
Β 
Giancarlo Aquilanti
Giancarlo AquilantiGiancarlo Aquilanti
Giancarlo Aquilanti
Β 
Giancarlo Aquilanti
Giancarlo AquilantiGiancarlo Aquilanti
Giancarlo Aquilanti
Β 
Global Markets for Industrial and Utility Solar Thermal Technologies
Global Markets for Industrial and Utility Solar Thermal TechnologiesGlobal Markets for Industrial and Utility Solar Thermal Technologies
Global Markets for Industrial and Utility Solar Thermal Technologies
Β 
Rural Energy Development and Education of China
Rural Energy Development and Education of ChinaRural Energy Development and Education of China
Rural Energy Development and Education of China
Β 
Electricity: Global Industry Guide
Electricity: Global Industry GuideElectricity: Global Industry Guide
Electricity: Global Industry Guide
Β 
Energy policy 20120725
Energy policy 20120725Energy policy 20120725
Energy policy 20120725
Β 
OECD Environmental Performance Review: Turkey 2019 - Launch presentation
OECD Environmental Performance Review: Turkey 2019 - Launch presentationOECD Environmental Performance Review: Turkey 2019 - Launch presentation
OECD Environmental Performance Review: Turkey 2019 - Launch presentation
Β 
International ETS Comparison
International ETS Comparison International ETS Comparison
International ETS Comparison
Β 
Argentina s12
Argentina s12Argentina s12
Argentina s12
Β 
Waste heat recovery dynamics an analogy of electricity generation & emiss...
Waste heat recovery dynamics an analogy of electricity generation & emiss...Waste heat recovery dynamics an analogy of electricity generation & emiss...
Waste heat recovery dynamics an analogy of electricity generation & emiss...
Β 
2013 TRI National Analysis_Public_Webinar_Briefing
2013 TRI National Analysis_Public_Webinar_Briefing2013 TRI National Analysis_Public_Webinar_Briefing
2013 TRI National Analysis_Public_Webinar_Briefing
Β 
Net Energy Generation by Source 2006 to June 2016
Net Energy Generation by Source   2006 to June 2016Net Energy Generation by Source   2006 to June 2016
Net Energy Generation by Source 2006 to June 2016
Β 
USC - John Bryan Energy Storage v2
USC - John Bryan Energy Storage v2USC - John Bryan Energy Storage v2
USC - John Bryan Energy Storage v2
Β 

More from Bruce LaCour

US Petrochemical Industry Future - Upstream - Natural Gas - Logic Versus Fait...
US Petrochemical Industry Future - Upstream - Natural Gas - Logic Versus Fait...US Petrochemical Industry Future - Upstream - Natural Gas - Logic Versus Fait...
US Petrochemical Industry Future - Upstream - Natural Gas - Logic Versus Fait...
Bruce LaCour
Β 

More from Bruce LaCour (20)

The Petrochemical Industry Can No Longer Guarantee Permanent Employment
The Petrochemical Industry Can No Longer Guarantee Permanent EmploymentThe Petrochemical Industry Can No Longer Guarantee Permanent Employment
The Petrochemical Industry Can No Longer Guarantee Permanent Employment
Β 
Future Trends - Air Conditioning with Thermal Energy Storage - Commercial and...
Future Trends - Air Conditioning with Thermal Energy Storage - Commercial and...Future Trends - Air Conditioning with Thermal Energy Storage - Commercial and...
Future Trends - Air Conditioning with Thermal Energy Storage - Commercial and...
Β 
Future Trends - Recycling - Demolished Construction Materials
Future Trends  - Recycling - Demolished Construction MaterialsFuture Trends  - Recycling - Demolished Construction Materials
Future Trends - Recycling - Demolished Construction Materials
Β 
Future Trends - Recycling - Electrical Wire
Future Trends - Recycling - Electrical WireFuture Trends - Recycling - Electrical Wire
Future Trends - Recycling - Electrical Wire
Β 
Future Trends - Recycling - Glass
Future Trends - Recycling - GlassFuture Trends - Recycling - Glass
Future Trends - Recycling - Glass
Β 
Future Trends - Recycling - Batteries
Future Trends - Recycling - BatteriesFuture Trends - Recycling - Batteries
Future Trends - Recycling - Batteries
Β 
Future Trends - Recycling - Electronics
Future Trends - Recycling - ElectronicsFuture Trends - Recycling - Electronics
Future Trends - Recycling - Electronics
Β 
Future Trends - Recycling - Metals - Part III
Future Trends - Recycling - Metals - Part IIIFuture Trends - Recycling - Metals - Part III
Future Trends - Recycling - Metals - Part III
Β 
Future Trends - Recycling - Metals - Part II
Future Trends -  Recycling - Metals - Part IIFuture Trends -  Recycling - Metals - Part II
Future Trends - Recycling - Metals - Part II
Β 
Future Trends - Recycling - Metals - Part I
Future Trends -  Recycling - Metals - Part IFuture Trends -  Recycling - Metals - Part I
Future Trends - Recycling - Metals - Part I
Β 
The Baby Boomer Mirage is Fading Fast
The Baby Boomer Mirage is Fading FastThe Baby Boomer Mirage is Fading Fast
The Baby Boomer Mirage is Fading Fast
Β 
Future Trends - Recycling - Vehicles and Tires
Future Trends -  Recycling - Vehicles and TiresFuture Trends -  Recycling - Vehicles and Tires
Future Trends - Recycling - Vehicles and Tires
Β 
Future Trends - Recycling - Material Recycling Facilities
Future Trends -  Recycling - Material Recycling FacilitiesFuture Trends -  Recycling - Material Recycling Facilities
Future Trends - Recycling - Material Recycling Facilities
Β 
Future Trends - Recycling - Waste oils
Future Trends  -  Recycling - Waste oilsFuture Trends  -  Recycling - Waste oils
Future Trends - Recycling - Waste oils
Β 
Future Trends - Recycling - Refrigerants
Future Trends -  Recycling - RefrigerantsFuture Trends -  Recycling - Refrigerants
Future Trends - Recycling - Refrigerants
Β 
Future Trends - Zero Waste
Future Trends -  Zero WasteFuture Trends -  Zero Waste
Future Trends - Zero Waste
Β 
US Petrochemical Industry Future - Integrating Design Operation and Maintenance
US Petrochemical Industry Future -  Integrating Design Operation and MaintenanceUS Petrochemical Industry Future -  Integrating Design Operation and Maintenance
US Petrochemical Industry Future - Integrating Design Operation and Maintenance
Β 
US Petrochemical Industry Future - Flexible Labor
US Petrochemical Industry Future -  Flexible LaborUS Petrochemical Industry Future -  Flexible Labor
US Petrochemical Industry Future - Flexible Labor
Β 
US Petrochemical Industry Future - Downstream
US Petrochemical Industry Future -  DownstreamUS Petrochemical Industry Future -  Downstream
US Petrochemical Industry Future - Downstream
Β 
US Petrochemical Industry Future - Upstream - Natural Gas - Logic Versus Fait...
US Petrochemical Industry Future - Upstream - Natural Gas - Logic Versus Fait...US Petrochemical Industry Future - Upstream - Natural Gas - Logic Versus Fait...
US Petrochemical Industry Future - Upstream - Natural Gas - Logic Versus Fait...
Β 

Recently uploaded

VIP Independent Call Girls in Mumbai 🌹 9920725232 ( Call Me ) Mumbai Escorts ...
VIP Independent Call Girls in Mumbai 🌹 9920725232 ( Call Me ) Mumbai Escorts ...VIP Independent Call Girls in Mumbai 🌹 9920725232 ( Call Me ) Mumbai Escorts ...
VIP Independent Call Girls in Mumbai 🌹 9920725232 ( Call Me ) Mumbai Escorts ...
dipikadinghjn ( Why You Choose Us? ) Escorts
Β 
VIP Independent Call Girls in Bandra West 🌹 9920725232 ( Call Me ) Mumbai Esc...
VIP Independent Call Girls in Bandra West 🌹 9920725232 ( Call Me ) Mumbai Esc...VIP Independent Call Girls in Bandra West 🌹 9920725232 ( Call Me ) Mumbai Esc...
VIP Independent Call Girls in Bandra West 🌹 9920725232 ( Call Me ) Mumbai Esc...
dipikadinghjn ( Why You Choose Us? ) Escorts
Β 
Call Girls in New Ashok Nagar, (delhi) call me [9953056974] escort service 24X7
Call Girls in New Ashok Nagar, (delhi) call me [9953056974] escort service 24X7Call Girls in New Ashok Nagar, (delhi) call me [9953056974] escort service 24X7
Call Girls in New Ashok Nagar, (delhi) call me [9953056974] escort service 24X7
9953056974 Low Rate Call Girls In Saket, Delhi NCR
Β 
VIP Call Girl Service Andheri West ⚑ 9920725232 What It Takes To Be The Best ...
VIP Call Girl Service Andheri West ⚑ 9920725232 What It Takes To Be The Best ...VIP Call Girl Service Andheri West ⚑ 9920725232 What It Takes To Be The Best ...
VIP Call Girl Service Andheri West ⚑ 9920725232 What It Takes To Be The Best ...
dipikadinghjn ( Why You Choose Us? ) Escorts
Β 
VIP Call Girl in Mumbai πŸ’§ 9920725232 ( Call Me ) Get A New Crush Everyday Wit...
VIP Call Girl in Mumbai πŸ’§ 9920725232 ( Call Me ) Get A New Crush Everyday Wit...VIP Call Girl in Mumbai πŸ’§ 9920725232 ( Call Me ) Get A New Crush Everyday Wit...
VIP Call Girl in Mumbai πŸ’§ 9920725232 ( Call Me ) Get A New Crush Everyday Wit...
dipikadinghjn ( Why You Choose Us? ) Escorts
Β 

Recently uploaded (20)

VIP Independent Call Girls in Mumbai 🌹 9920725232 ( Call Me ) Mumbai Escorts ...
VIP Independent Call Girls in Mumbai 🌹 9920725232 ( Call Me ) Mumbai Escorts ...VIP Independent Call Girls in Mumbai 🌹 9920725232 ( Call Me ) Mumbai Escorts ...
VIP Independent Call Girls in Mumbai 🌹 9920725232 ( Call Me ) Mumbai Escorts ...
Β 
The Economic History of the U.S. Lecture 26.pdf
The Economic History of the U.S. Lecture 26.pdfThe Economic History of the U.S. Lecture 26.pdf
The Economic History of the U.S. Lecture 26.pdf
Β 
The Economic History of the U.S. Lecture 18.pdf
The Economic History of the U.S. Lecture 18.pdfThe Economic History of the U.S. Lecture 18.pdf
The Economic History of the U.S. Lecture 18.pdf
Β 
00_Main ppt_MeetupDORA&CyberSecurity.pptx
00_Main ppt_MeetupDORA&CyberSecurity.pptx00_Main ppt_MeetupDORA&CyberSecurity.pptx
00_Main ppt_MeetupDORA&CyberSecurity.pptx
Β 
Booking open Available Pune Call Girls Talegaon Dabhade 6297143586 Call Hot ...
Booking open Available Pune Call Girls Talegaon Dabhade  6297143586 Call Hot ...Booking open Available Pune Call Girls Talegaon Dabhade  6297143586 Call Hot ...
Booking open Available Pune Call Girls Talegaon Dabhade 6297143586 Call Hot ...
Β 
Top Rated Pune Call Girls Sinhagad Road ⟟ 6297143586 ⟟ Call Me For Genuine S...
Top Rated  Pune Call Girls Sinhagad Road ⟟ 6297143586 ⟟ Call Me For Genuine S...Top Rated  Pune Call Girls Sinhagad Road ⟟ 6297143586 ⟟ Call Me For Genuine S...
Top Rated Pune Call Girls Sinhagad Road ⟟ 6297143586 ⟟ Call Me For Genuine S...
Β 
Gurley shaw Theory of Monetary Economics.
Gurley shaw Theory of Monetary Economics.Gurley shaw Theory of Monetary Economics.
Gurley shaw Theory of Monetary Economics.
Β 
Booking open Available Pune Call Girls Shivane 6297143586 Call Hot Indian Gi...
Booking open Available Pune Call Girls Shivane  6297143586 Call Hot Indian Gi...Booking open Available Pune Call Girls Shivane  6297143586 Call Hot Indian Gi...
Booking open Available Pune Call Girls Shivane 6297143586 Call Hot Indian Gi...
Β 
VIP Independent Call Girls in Bandra West 🌹 9920725232 ( Call Me ) Mumbai Esc...
VIP Independent Call Girls in Bandra West 🌹 9920725232 ( Call Me ) Mumbai Esc...VIP Independent Call Girls in Bandra West 🌹 9920725232 ( Call Me ) Mumbai Esc...
VIP Independent Call Girls in Bandra West 🌹 9920725232 ( Call Me ) Mumbai Esc...
Β 
Mira Road Awesome 100% Independent Call Girls NUmber-9833754194-Dahisar Inter...
Mira Road Awesome 100% Independent Call Girls NUmber-9833754194-Dahisar Inter...Mira Road Awesome 100% Independent Call Girls NUmber-9833754194-Dahisar Inter...
Mira Road Awesome 100% Independent Call Girls NUmber-9833754194-Dahisar Inter...
Β 
Call Girls in New Friends Colony Delhi πŸ’― Call Us πŸ”9205541914 πŸ”( Delhi) Escort...
Call Girls in New Friends Colony Delhi πŸ’― Call Us πŸ”9205541914 πŸ”( Delhi) Escort...Call Girls in New Friends Colony Delhi πŸ’― Call Us πŸ”9205541914 πŸ”( Delhi) Escort...
Call Girls in New Friends Colony Delhi πŸ’― Call Us πŸ”9205541914 πŸ”( Delhi) Escort...
Β 
Call Girls in New Ashok Nagar, (delhi) call me [9953056974] escort service 24X7
Call Girls in New Ashok Nagar, (delhi) call me [9953056974] escort service 24X7Call Girls in New Ashok Nagar, (delhi) call me [9953056974] escort service 24X7
Call Girls in New Ashok Nagar, (delhi) call me [9953056974] escort service 24X7
Β 
Solution Manual for Financial Accounting, 11th Edition by Robert Libby, Patri...
Solution Manual for Financial Accounting, 11th Edition by Robert Libby, Patri...Solution Manual for Financial Accounting, 11th Edition by Robert Libby, Patri...
Solution Manual for Financial Accounting, 11th Edition by Robert Libby, Patri...
Β 
(Vedika) Low Rate Call Girls in Pune Call Now 8250077686 Pune Escorts 24x7
(Vedika) Low Rate Call Girls in Pune Call Now 8250077686 Pune Escorts 24x7(Vedika) Low Rate Call Girls in Pune Call Now 8250077686 Pune Escorts 24x7
(Vedika) Low Rate Call Girls in Pune Call Now 8250077686 Pune Escorts 24x7
Β 
VIP Call Girl Service Andheri West ⚑ 9920725232 What It Takes To Be The Best ...
VIP Call Girl Service Andheri West ⚑ 9920725232 What It Takes To Be The Best ...VIP Call Girl Service Andheri West ⚑ 9920725232 What It Takes To Be The Best ...
VIP Call Girl Service Andheri West ⚑ 9920725232 What It Takes To Be The Best ...
Β 
Top Rated Pune Call Girls Viman Nagar ⟟ 6297143586 ⟟ Call Me For Genuine Sex...
Top Rated  Pune Call Girls Viman Nagar ⟟ 6297143586 ⟟ Call Me For Genuine Sex...Top Rated  Pune Call Girls Viman Nagar ⟟ 6297143586 ⟟ Call Me For Genuine Sex...
Top Rated Pune Call Girls Viman Nagar ⟟ 6297143586 ⟟ Call Me For Genuine Sex...
Β 
06_Joeri Van Speybroek_Dell_MeetupDora&Cybersecurity.pdf
06_Joeri Van Speybroek_Dell_MeetupDora&Cybersecurity.pdf06_Joeri Van Speybroek_Dell_MeetupDora&Cybersecurity.pdf
06_Joeri Van Speybroek_Dell_MeetupDora&Cybersecurity.pdf
Β 
WhatsApp πŸ“ž Call : 9892124323 βœ…Call Girls In Chembur ( Mumbai ) secure service
WhatsApp πŸ“ž Call : 9892124323  βœ…Call Girls In Chembur ( Mumbai ) secure serviceWhatsApp πŸ“ž Call : 9892124323  βœ…Call Girls In Chembur ( Mumbai ) secure service
WhatsApp πŸ“ž Call : 9892124323 βœ…Call Girls In Chembur ( Mumbai ) secure service
Β 
VIP Call Girl in Mumbai πŸ’§ 9920725232 ( Call Me ) Get A New Crush Everyday Wit...
VIP Call Girl in Mumbai πŸ’§ 9920725232 ( Call Me ) Get A New Crush Everyday Wit...VIP Call Girl in Mumbai πŸ’§ 9920725232 ( Call Me ) Get A New Crush Everyday Wit...
VIP Call Girl in Mumbai πŸ’§ 9920725232 ( Call Me ) Get A New Crush Everyday Wit...
Β 
The Economic History of the U.S. Lecture 19.pdf
The Economic History of the U.S. Lecture 19.pdfThe Economic History of the U.S. Lecture 19.pdf
The Economic History of the U.S. Lecture 19.pdf
Β 

US Energy Consumption by State as of 2005

  • 1. ENERGY CONSUMPTION ANALYSIS, RANKED BY STATE, 2004 Energy Information Administration 2004 RANKING BY HIGH INDUST SECTOR ENERGY CONSUM AS PERCENT OF TOTAL CONSUM (NOTE 1) STATE 2004 RANKING BY TOTAL ENERGY CONSUM PER CAPITA 2004 PERCENTAGE OF INDUSTRIAL SECTOR CONSUM OF TOTAL CONSUM (NOTE 1) (2000 CENSUS) RANKING IN POP DENSITY 2004 RANKING IN PER CAPITA MOTOR GASOLINE CONSUM 2004 RANKING IN TOTAL CONSUM BY RESIDENTAL SECTOR (NOTE 2) (LATEST INFO AVAIL) TYPE OF ENERGY PRODUCTION INDUSTRIES (2006 NPRA DATA) NUMBER OF REFINERIE S 2004 NUMBER OF NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS (AS OF 2005) PRIMARY FUELS FOR ELECT GEN 2004 RANKING BY LOWEST RETAIL ELECT PRICE (NOTE 3) 2004 RANKING BY PERCENT OF MANUF WORKERS (NOTE 4) 2004 RANKING BY PERCENT OF WORKERS IN SERVICE JOBS (NOTE 5) 2004 RANKING BY PERCENT OF WORKERS IN BUSINESS MANAGE AND FINANCIAL SECTOR (NOTE 6) 2004 RANKING BY MEDIAN AGE (NOTE 7) 2004 RANKING BY PER CAPITA PERSONAL INCOME (NOTE 8) 2004 RANKING BY MEDIAN MONTHLY COST FOR OWNER OCCUPIED HOUSING (NOTE 9) RANKING BY ECONOMY GROWTH (2004 TO 2005) (NOTE 10) 1 LOUISIANA 3 63.3 23 24 22 OIL, NATURAL GAS, BIODIESEL, NUCLEAR, AND PETROCHEM 18 2 NATURAL GAS (47.0%) COAL (24.9%) NUCLEAR (16.9%) 33 38 4 49 42 51 43 51 2 WYOMING 2 56.2 50 1 49 OIL, NATURAL GAS, URANIUM, AND COAL 5 0 COAL (95.1%) 3 48 20 24 10 15 30 9 3 TEXAS 5 53.5 29 16 2 OIL, NATURAL GAS, COAL, PETROCHEM, URANIUM, NUCLEAR, ETHANOL, BIODIESEL, AND WIND ENERGY 25 2 NATURAL GAS (49.4%) COAL (37.4%) NUCLEAR (9.6%) 37 28 18 29 50 28 41 17 4 ALASKA 1 50.5 51 31 47 OIL, NATURAL GAS, AND HYDROELECT 6 0 NATURAL GAS (56.6%) HYDROE (22.3%) 46 50 35 19 49 18 16 49 5 INDIANA 7 47.6 17 27 13 COAL, ETHANOL, BIODIESEL, AND PETROCHEM 2 0 COAL (94.2%) 5 1 27 45 37 33 38 47 Page 1 of 12
  • 2. ENERGY CONSUMPTION ANALYSIS, RANKED BY STATE, 2004 Energy Information Administration 2004 RANKING BY HIGH INDUST SECTOR ENERGY CONSUM AS PERCENT OF TOTAL CONSUM (NOTE 1) STATE 2004 RANKING BY TOTAL ENERGY CONSUM PER CAPITA 2004 PERCENTAGE OF INDUSTRIAL SECTOR CONSUM OF TOTAL CONSUM (NOTE 1) (2000 CENSUS) RANKING IN POP DENSITY 2004 RANKING IN PER CAPITA MOTOR GASOLINE CONSUM 2004 RANKING IN TOTAL CONSUM BY RESIDENTAL SECTOR (NOTE 2) (LATEST INFO AVAIL) TYPE OF ENERGY PRODUCTION INDUSTRIES (2006 NPRA DATA) NUMBER OF REFINERIE S 2004 NUMBER OF NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS (AS OF 2005) PRIMARY FUELS FOR ELECT GEN 2004 RANKING BY LOWEST RETAIL ELECT PRICE (NOTE 3) 2004 RANKING BY PERCENT OF MANUF WORKERS (NOTE 4) 2004 RANKING BY PERCENT OF WORKERS IN SERVICE JOBS (NOTE 5) 2004 RANKING BY PERCENT OF WORKERS IN BUSINESS MANAGE AND FINANCIAL SECTOR (NOTE 6) 2004 RANKING BY MEDIAN AGE (NOTE 7) 2004 RANKING BY PER CAPITA PERSONAL INCOME (NOTE 8) 2004 RANKING BY MEDIAN MONTHLY COST FOR OWNER OCCUPIED HOUSING (NOTE 9) RANKING BY ECONOMY GROWTH (2004 TO 2005) (NOTE 10) 6 NORTH DAKOTA 4 46.7 48 8 45 OIL, ETHANOL, SYNFUELS, WIND POWER, AND HYDROELECT 1 0 COAL (94.8%) 7 42 16 7 9 35 48 13 7 ALABAMA 6 46.3 27 17 21 BIODIESEL, HYDROELECT , COAL, OIL, NUCLEAR, AND PETROCHEM 4 3 COAL (56.6%) NUCLEAR (23.0%) NATURAL GAS (10.1%) 12 12 46 48 21 42 46 28 8 WEST VIRGINIA 9 44.1 30 41 34 COAL AND PETROCHEM 1 0 COAL (97.6%) 4 33 8 51 3 48 49 27 9 ARKANSAS 13 41.7 35 21 32 HYDROELECT , NATURAL GAS, BIODIESEL, NUCLEAR, AND PETROCHEM 2 1 COAL (48.2%) NUCLEAR (28.6%) NATURAL GAS (12.6%) 9 5 24 47 27 49 51 32 10 IOWA 15 41.2 34 7 30 ETHANOL, BIODIESEL, NUCLEAR, AND WIND ENERGY 0 1 COAL (77.6%) NUCLEAR (10.3%) 18 8 45 26 11 29 44 40 11 SOUTH CAROLINA 14 38.6 22 3 24 BIODIESEL, NUCLEAR, AND HYDROELECT 0 4 NUCLEAR (51.8%) COAL (38.7%) 15 9 32 44 26 44 35 25 Page 2 of 12
  • 3. ENERGY CONSUMPTION ANALYSIS, RANKED BY STATE, 2004 Energy Information Administration 2004 RANKING BY HIGH INDUST SECTOR ENERGY CONSUM AS PERCENT OF TOTAL CONSUM (NOTE 1) STATE 2004 RANKING BY TOTAL ENERGY CONSUM PER CAPITA 2004 PERCENTAGE OF INDUSTRIAL SECTOR CONSUM OF TOTAL CONSUM (NOTE 1) (2000 CENSUS) RANKING IN POP DENSITY 2004 RANKING IN PER CAPITA MOTOR GASOLINE CONSUM 2004 RANKING IN TOTAL CONSUM BY RESIDENTAL SECTOR (NOTE 2) (LATEST INFO AVAIL) TYPE OF ENERGY PRODUCTION INDUSTRIES (2006 NPRA DATA) NUMBER OF REFINERIE S 2004 NUMBER OF NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS (AS OF 2005) PRIMARY FUELS FOR ELECT GEN 2004 RANKING BY LOWEST RETAIL ELECT PRICE (NOTE 3) 2004 RANKING BY PERCENT OF MANUF WORKERS (NOTE 4) 2004 RANKING BY PERCENT OF WORKERS IN SERVICE JOBS (NOTE 5) 2004 RANKING BY PERCENT OF WORKERS IN BUSINESS MANAGE AND FINANCIAL SECTOR (NOTE 6) 2004 RANKING BY MEDIAN AGE (NOTE 7) 2004 RANKING BY PER CAPITA PERSONAL INCOME (NOTE 8) 2004 RANKING BY MEDIAN MONTHLY COST FOR OWNER OCCUPIED HOUSING (NOTE 9) RANKING BY ECONOMY GROWTH (2004 TO 2005) (NOTE 10) 12 IDAHO 23 38.0 45 34 39 HYDROELECT 0 0 HYDROE (78.9%) NATURAL GAS (14.3%) 2 21 16 33 45 45 29 4 13 MONTANA 10 37.9 49 12 43 OIL, NATURAL GAS, COAL, WIND POWER, AND HYDROELECT 4 0 COAL (63.8%) HYDROE (34.3%) 19 47 5 28 4 40 31 8 14 KENTUCKY 8 37.5 24 20 25 COAL, BIODIESEL, ETHANOL, AND HYROELECT 2 0 COAL (91.1%) 1 7 34 46 19 43 42 33 15 OKLAHOMA 11 37.3 36 2 28 OIL, NATURAL GAS, PETROCHEM, BIODIESEL, HYDROELECT , AND WIND ENERGY 5 0 COAL (53.0%) NATURAL GAS (41.6%) 22 24 10 39 33 41 47 30 16 MISSISSIPPI 12 37.3 33 6 31 OIL, NATURAL GAS, BIODIESEL, NUCLEAR AND PETROCHEM 4 1 COAL (36.9%) NATURAL GAS (34.1%) NUCLEAR (22.4%) 30 9 12 50 41 50 50 46 Page 3 of 12
  • 4. ENERGY CONSUMPTION ANALYSIS, RANKED BY STATE, 2004 Energy Information Administration 2004 RANKING BY HIGH INDUST SECTOR ENERGY CONSUM AS PERCENT OF TOTAL CONSUM (NOTE 1) STATE 2004 RANKING BY TOTAL ENERGY CONSUM PER CAPITA 2004 PERCENTAGE OF INDUSTRIAL SECTOR CONSUM OF TOTAL CONSUM (NOTE 1) (2000 CENSUS) RANKING IN POP DENSITY 2004 RANKING IN PER CAPITA MOTOR GASOLINE CONSUM 2004 RANKING IN TOTAL CONSUM BY RESIDENTAL SECTOR (NOTE 2) (LATEST INFO AVAIL) TYPE OF ENERGY PRODUCTION INDUSTRIES (2006 NPRA DATA) NUMBER OF REFINERIE S 2004 NUMBER OF NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS (AS OF 2005) PRIMARY FUELS FOR ELECT GEN 2004 RANKING BY LOWEST RETAIL ELECT PRICE (NOTE 3) 2004 RANKING BY PERCENT OF MANUF WORKERS (NOTE 4) 2004 RANKING BY PERCENT OF WORKERS IN SERVICE JOBS (NOTE 5) 2004 RANKING BY PERCENT OF WORKERS IN BUSINESS MANAGE AND FINANCIAL SECTOR (NOTE 6) 2004 RANKING BY MEDIAN AGE (NOTE 7) 2004 RANKING BY PER CAPITA PERSONAL INCOME (NOTE 8) 2004 RANKING BY MEDIAN MONTHLY COST FOR OWNER OCCUPIED HOUSING (NOTE 9) RANKING BY ECONOMY GROWTH (2004 TO 2005) (NOTE 10) 17 KANSAS 16 36.9 41 22 33 OIL, NATURAL GAS, NUCLEAR, COAL, ETHANOL, BIODIESEL, GEOTHERM, AND WIND ENERGY 3 1 COAL (75.2%) NUCLEAR (19.2%) 17 23 29 23 38 26 40 19 18 WISCONSIN 28 36.6 25 37 19 NUCLEAR BIODIESEL, AND ETHANOL 1 2 COAL (67.4%) NUCLEAR (16.0%) NATURAL GAS (10.3%) 25 3 44 32 17 21 26 39 19 DELAWARE 19 35.8 8 14 44 BIODIESEL AND PETROCHEM 1 0 COAL (59.4%) NATURAL GAS (19.6%) FUEL OIL (15.0%) 36 29 47 14 16 12 18 45 20 TENNESSEE 17 33.8 20 9 14 NUCLEAR, BIODIESEL, ETHANOL, AND HYDROELECT 1 2 COAL (61.0%) NUCLEAR (28.6%) HYDROE (9.6%) 13 4 39 41 23 36 37 42 Page 4 of 12
  • 5. ENERGY CONSUMPTION ANALYSIS, RANKED BY STATE, 2004 Energy Information Administration 2004 RANKING BY HIGH INDUST SECTOR ENERGY CONSUM AS PERCENT OF TOTAL CONSUM (NOTE 1) STATE 2004 RANKING BY TOTAL ENERGY CONSUM PER CAPITA 2004 PERCENTAGE OF INDUSTRIAL SECTOR CONSUM OF TOTAL CONSUM (NOTE 1) (2000 CENSUS) RANKING IN POP DENSITY 2004 RANKING IN PER CAPITA MOTOR GASOLINE CONSUM 2004 RANKING IN TOTAL CONSUM BY RESIDENTAL SECTOR (NOTE 2) (LATEST INFO AVAIL) TYPE OF ENERGY PRODUCTION INDUSTRIES (2006 NPRA DATA) NUMBER OF REFINERIE S 2004 NUMBER OF NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS (AS OF 2005) PRIMARY FUELS FOR ELECT GEN 2004 RANKING BY LOWEST RETAIL ELECT PRICE (NOTE 3) 2004 RANKING BY PERCENT OF MANUF WORKERS (NOTE 4) 2004 RANKING BY PERCENT OF WORKERS IN SERVICE JOBS (NOTE 5) 2004 RANKING BY PERCENT OF WORKERS IN BUSINESS MANAGE AND FINANCIAL SECTOR (NOTE 6) 2004 RANKING BY MEDIAN AGE (NOTE 7) 2004 RANKING BY PER CAPITA PERSONAL INCOME (NOTE 8) 2004 RANKING BY MEDIAN MONTHLY COST FOR OWNER OCCUPIED HOUSING (NOTE 9) RANKING BY ECONOMY GROWTH (2004 TO 2005) (NOTE 10) 21 OHIO 25 33.8 10 36 7 COAL, BIODIESEL, ETHANOL, NUCLEAR AND PETROCHEM 4 2 COAL (87.2%) NUCLEAR (9.4%) 26 6 19 35 18 27 28 48 22 NEW MEXICO 21 33.4 46 23 40 OIL, NATURAL GAS, URANIUM, AND WIND ENERGY 3 0 COAL (85.2%) NATURAL GAS (11.9%) 31 46 3 40 35 47 36 12 23 PENNSLYLVANNIA 30 32.5 11 47 5 NUCLEAR, OIL, BIODIESEL, AND COAL 5 5 COAL (55.5%) NUCLEAR (35.0%) 38 14 32 34 5 19 34 36 24 MAINE 20 32.1 39 4 38 WOOD AND HYDROELECT 0 0 NATURAL GAS (44.6%) HYDROE (21.7%) RENEW (21.6%) 41 30 11 42 1 32 25 43 25 ILLINOIS 34 31.6 12 46 6 NUCLEAR, ETHANOL, BIODIESEL, COAL, AND PETROCHEM 4 6 NUCLEAR (48.0%) COAL (47.7%) 24 16 27 18 40 16 19 35 26 NEBRASKA 18 31.5 43 30 37 NUCLEAR, BIODIESEL, ETHANOL, HYDROELECT , AND WIND ENERGY 0 2 COAL (66.2%) NUCLEAR (28.0%) 6 36 25 10 34 23 39 41 Page 5 of 12
  • 6. ENERGY CONSUMPTION ANALYSIS, RANKED BY STATE, 2004 Energy Information Administration 2004 RANKING BY HIGH INDUST SECTOR ENERGY CONSUM AS PERCENT OF TOTAL CONSUM (NOTE 1) STATE 2004 RANKING BY TOTAL ENERGY CONSUM PER CAPITA 2004 PERCENTAGE OF INDUSTRIAL SECTOR CONSUM OF TOTAL CONSUM (NOTE 1) (2000 CENSUS) RANKING IN POP DENSITY 2004 RANKING IN PER CAPITA MOTOR GASOLINE CONSUM 2004 RANKING IN TOTAL CONSUM BY RESIDENTAL SECTOR (NOTE 2) (LATEST INFO AVAIL) TYPE OF ENERGY PRODUCTION INDUSTRIES (2006 NPRA DATA) NUMBER OF REFINERIE S 2004 NUMBER OF NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS (AS OF 2005) PRIMARY FUELS FOR ELECT GEN 2004 RANKING BY LOWEST RETAIL ELECT PRICE (NOTE 3) 2004 RANKING BY PERCENT OF MANUF WORKERS (NOTE 4) 2004 RANKING BY PERCENT OF WORKERS IN SERVICE JOBS (NOTE 5) 2004 RANKING BY PERCENT OF WORKERS IN BUSINESS MANAGE AND FINANCIAL SECTOR (NOTE 6) 2004 RANKING BY MEDIAN AGE (NOTE 7) 2004 RANKING BY PER CAPITA PERSONAL INCOME (NOTE 8) 2004 RANKING BY MEDIAN MONTHLY COST FOR OWNER OCCUPIED HOUSING (NOTE 9) RANKING BY ECONOMY GROWTH (2004 TO 2005) (NOTE 10) 27 GEORGIA 24 30.6 19 15 9 BIODIESEL AND NUCLEAR 1 2 COAL (63.8%) NUCLEAR (23.1%) 23 18 48 17 48 34 27 11 28 MINNESOTA 22 30.6 32 18 20 BIODIESEL, ETHANOL, AND NUCLEAR 2 2 COAL (62.1%) NUCLEAR (24.2%) 17 13 42 11 31 10 15 44 29 UTAH 36 28.7 42 32 36 OIL, NATURAL GAS, URANIUM, COAL, AND GEOTHERM 5 0 COAL (94.2%) 8 32 49 36 51 46 20 6 30 MICHIGAN 35 28.3 16 29 8 NUCLEAR, ETHANOL, BIODIESEL, AND WOOD 1 3 COAL (57.8%) NUCLEAR (27.0%) NATURAL GAS (11.2%) 27 2 14 38 30 25 24 50 31 WASHINGTON 31 27.9 26 43 16 NUCLEAR, HYDROELECT , BIODIESEL, AND PETROCHEM 5 2 HYDROE (70.7%) COAL (10.3%) NATURAL GAS (8.4%) 10 31 26 16 32 17 12 21 32 OREGON 37 27.5 40 44 29 ETHANOL, BIODIESEL, AND HYDROELECT 1 0 HYDROE (62.7%) NATURAL GAS (26.7%) 14 17 23 31 28 30 14 5 Page 6 of 12
  • 7. ENERGY CONSUMPTION ANALYSIS, RANKED BY STATE, 2004 Energy Information Administration 2004 RANKING BY HIGH INDUST SECTOR ENERGY CONSUM AS PERCENT OF TOTAL CONSUM (NOTE 1) STATE 2004 RANKING BY TOTAL ENERGY CONSUM PER CAPITA 2004 PERCENTAGE OF INDUSTRIAL SECTOR CONSUM OF TOTAL CONSUM (NOTE 1) (2000 CENSUS) RANKING IN POP DENSITY 2004 RANKING IN PER CAPITA MOTOR GASOLINE CONSUM 2004 RANKING IN TOTAL CONSUM BY RESIDENTAL SECTOR (NOTE 2) (LATEST INFO AVAIL) TYPE OF ENERGY PRODUCTION INDUSTRIES (2006 NPRA DATA) NUMBER OF REFINERIE S 2004 NUMBER OF NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS (AS OF 2005) PRIMARY FUELS FOR ELECT GEN 2004 RANKING BY LOWEST RETAIL ELECT PRICE (NOTE 3) 2004 RANKING BY PERCENT OF MANUF WORKERS (NOTE 4) 2004 RANKING BY PERCENT OF WORKERS IN SERVICE JOBS (NOTE 5) 2004 RANKING BY PERCENT OF WORKERS IN BUSINESS MANAGE AND FINANCIAL SECTOR (NOTE 6) 2004 RANKING BY MEDIAN AGE (NOTE 7) 2004 RANKING BY PER CAPITA PERSONAL INCOME (NOTE 8) 2004 RANKING BY MEDIAN MONTHLY COST FOR OWNER OCCUPIED HOUSING (NOTE 9) RANKING BY ECONOMY GROWTH (2004 TO 2005) (NOTE 10) 33 COLORADO 39 26.9 38 41 26 OIL, NATURAL GAS, ETHANOL, BIODIESEL, URANIUM, AND COAL 2 0 COAL (71.7%) NATURAL GAS (24.0%) 29 40 37 5 44 9 11 18 34 NEVADA 40 26.8 44 49 35 BIODIESEL, HYDROELECT , URANIUM AND GEOTHERM 1 0 NATURAL GAS (46.6%) COAL (45.7%) 40 45 1 42 43 13 13 2 35 NORTH CAROLINA 33 26.6 18 25 10 BIODIESEL, NUCLEAR, AND HYDROELECT 0 3 COAL (60.5%) NUCLEAR (30.8%) 28 11 31 37 35 38 32 20 36 CALIFORNIA 49 24.6 12 45 1 OIL, PETROCHEM, HYDROELECT , ETHANOL, BIODIESEL, NUCLEAR, AND GEOTHERM 21 2 NATURAL GAS (46.7%) HYROE (19.8%) NUCLEAR (18.1%) 49 27 21 13 47 11 1 16 37 MARYLAND 41 24.1 6 38 18 BIODIESEL AND NUCLEAR 0 1 COAL (55.7%) NUCLEAR (27.9%) 32 44 41 3 25 5 10 22 Page 7 of 12
  • 8. ENERGY CONSUMPTION ANALYSIS, RANKED BY STATE, 2004 Energy Information Administration 2004 RANKING BY HIGH INDUST SECTOR ENERGY CONSUM AS PERCENT OF TOTAL CONSUM (NOTE 1) STATE 2004 RANKING BY TOTAL ENERGY CONSUM PER CAPITA 2004 PERCENTAGE OF INDUSTRIAL SECTOR CONSUM OF TOTAL CONSUM (NOTE 1) (2000 CENSUS) RANKING IN POP DENSITY 2004 RANKING IN PER CAPITA MOTOR GASOLINE CONSUM 2004 RANKING IN TOTAL CONSUM BY RESIDENTAL SECTOR (NOTE 2) (LATEST INFO AVAIL) TYPE OF ENERGY PRODUCTION INDUSTRIES (2006 NPRA DATA) NUMBER OF REFINERIE S 2004 NUMBER OF NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS (AS OF 2005) PRIMARY FUELS FOR ELECT GEN 2004 RANKING BY LOWEST RETAIL ELECT PRICE (NOTE 3) 2004 RANKING BY PERCENT OF MANUF WORKERS (NOTE 4) 2004 RANKING BY PERCENT OF WORKERS IN SERVICE JOBS (NOTE 5) 2004 RANKING BY PERCENT OF WORKERS IN BUSINESS MANAGE AND FINANCIAL SECTOR (NOTE 6) 2004 RANKING BY MEDIAN AGE (NOTE 7) 2004 RANKING BY PER CAPITA PERSONAL INCOME (NOTE 8) 2004 RANKING BY MEDIAN MONTHLY COST FOR OWNER OCCUPIED HOUSING (NOTE 9) RANKING BY ECONOMY GROWTH (2004 TO 2005) (NOTE 10) 38 SOUTH DAKOTA 27 24.0 47 5 46 BIODIESEL, ETHANOL, WIND ENERGY, AND HYDROELECT 0 0 HYDROE (47.2%) COAL (46.0%) 20 37 17 9 29 37 45 24 39 VIRGINIA 26 23.1 15 19 12 BIODIESEL, NUCLEAR, COAL, AND HYDROELECT 0 2 COAL (44.9%) NUCLEAR (35.4%) NATURAL GAS (10.5%) 21 35 50 4 24 8 17 7 40 HAWAII 45 21.4 14 50 51 BIODIESEL AND ETHANOL 2 0 FUEL OIL (78.8%) COAL (14.2%) 51 49 2 25 12 20 2 10 41 MISSOURI 32 21.1 28 10 15 NUCLEAR, HYDROELECT , BIODIESEL, AND ETHANOL 0 1 COAL (85.3%) NUCLEAR (8.8%) 11 21 22 30 22 31 33 34 42 VERMONT 42 18.6 31 11 48 NUCLEAR AND HYDROELECT 0 1 NUCLEAR (71.2%) HYDROE (21.2%) 47 25 30 15 2 24 21 29 43 NEW JERSEY 38 18.4 2 28 11 BIODIESEL, NUCLEAR, AND PETROCHEM 6 3 NUCLEAR (51.8%) NATURAL GAS (25.1%) COAL (19.2%) 43 34 43 6 15 4 5 37 Page 8 of 12
  • 9. ENERGY CONSUMPTION ANALYSIS, RANKED BY STATE, 2004 Energy Information Administration 2004 RANKING BY HIGH INDUST SECTOR ENERGY CONSUM AS PERCENT OF TOTAL CONSUM (NOTE 1) STATE 2004 RANKING BY TOTAL ENERGY CONSUM PER CAPITA 2004 PERCENTAGE OF INDUSTRIAL SECTOR CONSUM OF TOTAL CONSUM (NOTE 1) (2000 CENSUS) RANKING IN POP DENSITY 2004 RANKING IN PER CAPITA MOTOR GASOLINE CONSUM 2004 RANKING IN TOTAL CONSUM BY RESIDENTAL SECTOR (NOTE 2) (LATEST INFO AVAIL) TYPE OF ENERGY PRODUCTION INDUSTRIES (2006 NPRA DATA) NUMBER OF REFINERIE S 2004 NUMBER OF NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS (AS OF 2005) PRIMARY FUELS FOR ELECT GEN 2004 RANKING BY LOWEST RETAIL ELECT PRICE (NOTE 3) 2004 RANKING BY PERCENT OF MANUF WORKERS (NOTE 4) 2004 RANKING BY PERCENT OF WORKERS IN SERVICE JOBS (NOTE 5) 2004 RANKING BY PERCENT OF WORKERS IN BUSINESS MANAGE AND FINANCIAL SECTOR (NOTE 6) 2004 RANKING BY MEDIAN AGE (NOTE 7) 2004 RANKING BY PER CAPITA PERSONAL INCOME (NOTE 8) 2004 RANKING BY MEDIAN MONTHLY COST FOR OWNER OCCUPIED HOUSING (NOTE 9) RANKING BY ECONOMY GROWTH (2004 TO 2005) (NOTE 10) 44 RHODE ISLAND 51 17.8 3 35 42 BIODIESEL 0 0 NATURAL GAS (99.0%) 45 20 13 22 13 14 6 38 45 NEW HAMPSHIRE 44 16.5 21 13 41 NUCLEAR AND HYDROELECT 0 1 NUCLEAR (38.6%) NATURAL GAS (27.7%) COAL (16.6%) 48 15 51 12 7 7 9 15 46 ARIZONA 47 16.1 37 48 23 HYDROELECT , COAL, URANIUM, AND NUCLEAR 0 1 COAL (39.6%) NATURAL GAS (28.5%) NUCLEAR (25.4%) 34 39 9 20 46 39 23 1 47 CONNECTICUT 43 13.3 5 40 27 BIODIESEL AND NUCLEAR 0 1 NUCLEAR (46.4%) NATURAL GAS (26.4%) COAL (11.9%) FUEL OIL (9.4%) 42 18 38 2 7 2 7 23 Page 9 of 12
  • 10. ENERGY CONSUMPTION ANALYSIS, RANKED BY STATE, 2004 Energy Information Administration 2004 RANKING BY HIGH INDUST SECTOR ENERGY CONSUM AS PERCENT OF TOTAL CONSUM (NOTE 1) STATE 2004 RANKING BY TOTAL ENERGY CONSUM PER CAPITA 2004 PERCENTAGE OF INDUSTRIAL SECTOR CONSUM OF TOTAL CONSUM (NOTE 1) (2000 CENSUS) RANKING IN POP DENSITY 2004 RANKING IN PER CAPITA MOTOR GASOLINE CONSUM 2004 RANKING IN TOTAL CONSUM BY RESIDENTAL SECTOR (NOTE 2) (LATEST INFO AVAIL) TYPE OF ENERGY PRODUCTION INDUSTRIES (2006 NPRA DATA) NUMBER OF REFINERIE S 2004 NUMBER OF NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS (AS OF 2005) PRIMARY FUELS FOR ELECT GEN 2004 RANKING BY LOWEST RETAIL ELECT PRICE (NOTE 3) 2004 RANKING BY PERCENT OF MANUF WORKERS (NOTE 4) 2004 RANKING BY PERCENT OF WORKERS IN SERVICE JOBS (NOTE 5) 2004 RANKING BY PERCENT OF WORKERS IN BUSINESS MANAGE AND FINANCIAL SECTOR (NOTE 6) 2004 RANKING BY MEDIAN AGE (NOTE 7) 2004 RANKING BY PER CAPITA PERSONAL INCOME (NOTE 8) 2004 RANKING BY MEDIAN MONTHLY COST FOR OWNER OCCUPIED HOUSING (NOTE 9) RANKING BY ECONOMY GROWTH (2004 TO 2005) (NOTE 10) 48 MASSACHUSETTS 48 13.3 4 33 17 NUCLEAR 0 1 NATURAL GAS (42.7%) COAL (25.3%) FUEL OIL (15.0%) NUCLEAR (11.5%) 44 26 36 8 14 3 4 31 49 NEW YORK 50 12.6 7 50 4 BIODIESEL, HYDROELECT , AND NUCLEAR 0 4 NUCLEAR (28.9%) NATURAL GAS (21.7%) HYDROE (17.6%) FUEL OIL (16.4%) 50 41 7 21 20 6 8 26 50 FLORIDA 46 12.4 9 26 3 BIODIESEL AND NUCLEAR 0 2 NATURAL GAS (38.0%) COAL (28.4%) FUEL OIL (16.9%) NUCLEAR (13.1%) 39 43 6 27 6 22 22 3 51 WASHINGTON DC 29 0.2 1 51 50 "HOT AIR" 0 0 FUEL OIL (100%) 35 51 40 1 39 1 3 14 UNITED STATES AVERAGE 33.0% 31.7 148 66 12.1% 16.3% 13.6% 36.4 $33,847 $151,366 3.4% US VIRGIN ISLANDS 1 (Owned jointly by Hess Co. and PDV (Venezuela's National Oil Co.) Page 10 of 12
  • 11. ENERGY CONSUMPTION ANALYSIS, RANKED BY STATE, 2004 Energy Information Administration 2004 RANKING BY HIGH INDUST SECTOR ENERGY CONSUM AS PERCENT OF TOTAL CONSUM (NOTE 1) STATE 2004 RANKING BY TOTAL ENERGY CONSUM PER CAPITA 2004 PERCENTAGE OF INDUSTRIAL SECTOR CONSUM OF TOTAL CONSUM (NOTE 1) (2000 CENSUS) RANKING IN POP DENSITY 2004 RANKING IN PER CAPITA MOTOR GASOLINE CONSUM 2004 RANKING IN TOTAL CONSUM BY RESIDENTAL SECTOR (NOTE 2) (LATEST INFO AVAIL) TYPE OF ENERGY PRODUCTION INDUSTRIES (2006 NPRA DATA) NUMBER OF REFINERIE S 2004 NUMBER OF NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS (AS OF 2005) PRIMARY FUELS FOR ELECT GEN 2004 RANKING BY LOWEST RETAIL ELECT PRICE (NOTE 3) 2004 RANKING BY PERCENT OF MANUF WORKERS (NOTE 4) 2004 RANKING BY PERCENT OF WORKERS IN SERVICE JOBS (NOTE 5) 2004 RANKING BY PERCENT OF WORKERS IN BUSINESS MANAGE AND FINANCIAL SECTOR (NOTE 6) 2004 RANKING BY MEDIAN AGE (NOTE 7) 2004 RANKING BY PER CAPITA PERSONAL INCOME (NOTE 8) 2004 RANKING BY MEDIAN MONTHLY COST FOR OWNER OCCUPIED HOUSING (NOTE 9) RANKING BY ECONOMY GROWTH (2004 TO 2005) (NOTE 10) PUERTO RICO 1 ENERGY CONSUM RANKING STATE TOTAL ENERGY (TRILLIO N BTU 2005) PER CAPITA CONSUMP RANKING 1 TEXAS 11971.4 PEOPLE + INDUSTRY 5 VERY HIGH LEVEL OF ENERGY INTENSIVE MANUFACTURING BUT ALSO A LOT OF PEOPLE 2 CALIFORNIA 8364.6 PEOPLE + INDUSTRY 49 SO CALLED ENERGY EFFICIENT STATE IS A LARGE ENERGY CONSUMER STATE DUE TO LARGE POPULATION! 3 FLORIDA 4452.5 PEOPLE 46 SO CALLED ENERGY EFFICIENT STATE IS A LARGE ENERGY CONSUMER STATE DUE TO LARGE POPULATION! 4 NEW YORK 4254.0 PEOPLE 50 SO CALLED ENERGY EFFICIENT STATE IS A LARGE ENERGY CONSUMER STATE DUE TO LARGE POPULATION! 5 PENNSYLVANIA 4049.4 PEOPLE + INDUSTRY 30 SO CALLED ENERGY EFFICIENT STATE IS A LARGE ENERGY CONSUMER STATE DUE TO LARGE POPULATION! 6 OHIO 4022.8 PEOPLE + INDUSTRY 25 7 ILLINOIS 3960.5 PEOPLE + INDUSTRY 34 SO CALLED ENERGY EFFICIENT STATE IS A LARGE ENERGY CONSUMER STATE DUE TO LARGE POPULATION! 8 LOUISIANA 3816.3 PETROCHEMICAL INDUSTRY 3 VERY HIGH LEVEL OF ENERGY INTENSIVE MANUFACTURING 9 GEORGIA 3141.1 PEOPLE + INDUSTRY 24 10 MICHIGAN 3119.4 PEOPLE + INDUSTRY 35 SO CALLED ENERGY EFFICIENT STATE IS A LARGE ENERGY CONSUMER STATE DUE TO LARGE POPULATION! NOTE 1: Highest rankings have the greatest energy consumption by the industrial sector as a percentage of total energy consumption making them the most industrialized areas in the United States. TEN LARGEST CONSUMERS OF ENERGY IN THE UNITED STATES - PEOPLE ARE THE PROBLEM, NOT INDUSTRY! MAIN REASON FOR ENERGY CONSUMPTION NOTE 2: Highest rankings have greatest energy consumption by the residental sector as a percentage of total energy consumption making them the least industrialized areas of the United States. The least industrialized areas are occupied by the least productive in the energy and manufacturing areas and are red. Industrial sector: An energy-consuming sector that consists of all facilities and equipment used for producing, processing, or assembling goods. The industrial sector encompasses the following types of activity: manufacturing (NAICS codes 31-33); agriculture, forestry, fishing and hunting (NAICS code 11); mining, including oil and gas extraction (NAICS code 21); and construction (NAICS code 23). Overall energy use in this sector is largely for process heat and cooling and powering machinery, with lesser amounts used for facility heating, air conditioning, and lighting. Fossil fuels are also used as raw material inputs to manufactured products. Note: This sector includes generators that produce electricity and/or useful thermal output primarily to support the above-mentioned industrial activities. Page 11 of 12
  • 12. ENERGY CONSUMPTION ANALYSIS, RANKED BY STATE, 2004 Energy Information Administration 2004 RANKING BY HIGH INDUST SECTOR ENERGY CONSUM AS PERCENT OF TOTAL CONSUM (NOTE 1) STATE 2004 RANKING BY TOTAL ENERGY CONSUM PER CAPITA 2004 PERCENTAGE OF INDUSTRIAL SECTOR CONSUM OF TOTAL CONSUM (NOTE 1) (2000 CENSUS) RANKING IN POP DENSITY 2004 RANKING IN PER CAPITA MOTOR GASOLINE CONSUM 2004 RANKING IN TOTAL CONSUM BY RESIDENTAL SECTOR (NOTE 2) (LATEST INFO AVAIL) TYPE OF ENERGY PRODUCTION INDUSTRIES (2006 NPRA DATA) NUMBER OF REFINERIE S 2004 NUMBER OF NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS (AS OF 2005) PRIMARY FUELS FOR ELECT GEN 2004 RANKING BY LOWEST RETAIL ELECT PRICE (NOTE 3) 2004 RANKING BY PERCENT OF MANUF WORKERS (NOTE 4) 2004 RANKING BY PERCENT OF WORKERS IN SERVICE JOBS (NOTE 5) 2004 RANKING BY PERCENT OF WORKERS IN BUSINESS MANAGE AND FINANCIAL SECTOR (NOTE 6) 2004 RANKING BY MEDIAN AGE (NOTE 7) 2004 RANKING BY PER CAPITA PERSONAL INCOME (NOTE 8) 2004 RANKING BY MEDIAN MONTHLY COST FOR OWNER OCCUPIED HOUSING (NOTE 9) RANKING BY ECONOMY GROWTH (2004 TO 2005) (NOTE 10) NOTE 5: 2004 American Community Survey: Highest rankings have highest percentage of service workers. Service workers generally do not produce any products; therefore, highest rankings are red. BLUE = ABOVE AVERAGE ENERGY USE EFFICIENCY STATISTIC (TOP 15) RED = BELOW AVERAGE ENERGY USE EFFICIENCY STATISTIC (LOWEST 15) ORANGE = MATT SIMMONS NEW ENGLAND STATES WITH LITTLE OR NO FOSSIL FUEL ENERGY RESOURCES + HAWAII VIOLET = MATT SIMMONS ENERGY PARASITE STATES + DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA (Revised based on % industrial sector consumption data) DARK BLUE = ENERGY EFFICIENT STATE WITH LITTLE OR NO FOSSIL FUEL RESOURCES BUT NOT CONSUMING ALOT OF GASOLINE OR NATURAL GAS ON A PER CAPITA BASIS NOTE 10: 2004 Census Bureau data. Highest rankings have the highest economic growth rates. These areas are the areas generally people are moving to and are the areas where energy consumption is increasing, usually residential energy consumption. The highest rankings are red. NOTE 4: 2004 American Community Survey : Highest rankings have the highest percentage of manufacturing workers. Manufacturing workers produce chemicals, energy resources, food, and products in general: therefore, highest rankings are blue. NOTE 6: 2004 American Community Survey: Highest rankings have highest percentage of business, management, and financial sector workers. These workers generally produce few products; therefore, highest rankings are red. NOTE 9: 2004 Census Bureau data. Highest rankings have the highest median monthly cost for owner-occupied housing. Those areas are ususally the areas with highest population density, highest electricity cost, highest per capita income, the highest median age populations, and usually the least amount industrial activity; therefore, the highest rankings are red. NOTE 3: Highest rankings have the lowest retail electricity prices. Highest ranks usually mean that the cost of producing the electricity is lower than the average; therefore, highest rankings are blue. NOTE 7: 2004 Census Bureau data. Highest rankings have the highest median age. Older workers are less productive than younger workers; therefore, highest rankings are red. NOTE 8: 2004 Census Bureau data. Highest rankings have the highest per capital personal income. Those areas with the highest personal per capita income are usually the areas that personally consume the largest amounts of energy; therfore, the highest rankings are red. Page 12 of 12