The Consortia Advancing Standards in Research Administration Information (CASRAI) is an international non-profit dedicated to reducing the administrative burden on researchers and improving business intelligence capacity of research institutions and funders.
4. RESEARCH ADMINISTRATION DATA
Research
proposal
Research
activity
Person
Research
results
Financial
reporting
Funder
policies
Institutional
policies
Data
management
plans & infra
Impacts –
social, economic
& cultural
Substantive
reporting
Metrics
Research
services data
Budget
Research
classification
HQP
training
Data
ID
Person
ID
Outcomes
(e.g. Knowledge
advancement)
Regulatory
requirements
Ethics
approval
& monitoring
Peer
review
Organization
ID
Contributor
roles
Collaborative
types
Outputs
Some elements of a complex ecosystem that we track
4
5. All Funding
Agencies are…
All Institutions
are…
All Governments
are…
All Industry
Partners are…
...but each
in a silo
• Substantive
reporting
• Metrics
• Impacts –
social, economic
& cultural
• Outcomes
(e.g. Knowledge
advancement)
• Data ID
• Person ID
• Outputs
• Research
classification
• Funder
policies
• Financial
reporting
RESEARCH ADMINISTRATION DATA
The players and how they use research administration data
5
ID-ing, Defining,
Classifying,
Grouping:
People, Orgs,
Projects,
Equipment,
Investments,
Outputs, Impacts
• Budget
• Data
Management
plans & infra
• Regulatory
requirements
• Ethics approval
& monitoring
• Collaborative
types
• Peer
review
• Contributor
roles
• HQP
training
• Research
services
data
6. All Funding
Agencies are…
All Institutions
are…
All Governments
are…
All Industry
Partners are…
ID-ing, Defining,
Classifying,
Grouping:
People, Orgs,
Projects,
Equipment,
Investments,
Outputs, Impacts
• Budget
• Data
Management
plans & infra
• Regulatory
requirements
• Ethics approval
& monitoring
• Collaborative
types
• Peer
review
• Contributor
roles
• HQP
training
• Research
services
data
• Substantive
reporting
• Metrics
• Impacts –
social, economic
& cultural
• Outcomes
(e.g. Knowledge
advancement)
• Data ID
• Person ID
• Outputs
• Research
classification
• Funder
policies
• Financial
reporting
RESEARCH ADMINISTRATION DATA
Benefits of a practical, standards-based view
6
8. Number of organizations
participating = 147
Number of countries
Involved = 14
Number of Subject Matter
Experts collaborating = 334
8
9. ORGANIZATIONS – SUSTAINING (1/3)
The following organizations actively support the CASRAI mandate and make financial,
leadership and subject matter expert contributions to the standards and to CASRAI
operations.
9
INSTITUTIONS
• National Library of Sweden (SE)
• OCAD University (CA)
• University of Prince Edward Island (CA)
• Queen’s University (CA)
• University of Saskatchewan (CA)
• University of Toronto (CA)
• University of Waterloo (CA)
• York University (CA)
• University of Alberta (CA)
• University of British Columbia (CA)
• Carleton University (CA)
• Concordia University (CA)
• Denison University (US)
• University of Guelph (CA)
• McGill University (CA)
• University of Montreal (CA)
10. ORGANIZATIONS – SUSTAINING (2/3)
10
FUNDING ORGANIZATIONS
• Alberta Innovates Health Solutions (CA)
• Canada Foundation for Innovation (CA)
• Fonds de recherche du Quebec (CA)
• Foundation for Science and Technology (PT)
• Research Manitoba (CA)
• Natural Sciences and Engineering Research
Council of Canada (CA)
• Nova Scotia Health Research Foundation (CA)
• New Brunswick Health Research Foundation
(CA)
• Ontario Ministry of Research and Innovation
(CA)
• Saskatchewan Health Research Foundation
(CA)
• Social Sciences and Humanities Research
Council of Canada (CA)
• The Swedish Research Council (SE)
• Wellcome Trust (UK)
• Jisc (UK)
12. ORGANIZATIONS – PARTNERING
The following organizations share an interest in the CASRAI mandate and actively
collaborate in the standards-setting process.
• Association of Commonwealth Universities (UK)
• Canadian Association of Research Libraries (CA)
• Canadian Association of University Research Administrators (CA)
• Confederation of Open Access Repositories (DE)
• euroCRIS (NL)
• National Information Standards Organization (US)
• ORCID (US)
• SRI International (US)
• VIVO (US)
12
13. ORGANIZATIONS – PARTICIPATING (1/4)
The following organizations provide subject matter expertise to the standards-setting
process.
CANADA
• University of Victoria (CA)
• University of Ottawa (CA)
• University of Calgary (CA)
• Dennis Rank and Associates (CA)
13
UK
• BioMed Central (UK)
• Bournemouth University (UK)
• British Library (UK)
• Cambridge University Press (UK)
• Centre for Internet Technologies (UK)
• Clax Ltd (UK)
• Cranfield School of Management (UK)
• CrossRef (UK)
• Department for Employment and Learning (UK)
• Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (UK)
• GigaScience (UK)
• Higher Education Funding Council for England (UK)
14. ORGANIZATIONS – PARTICIPATING (2/4)
UK
14
• The Economic and Social Research Council (UK)
• Universities and Colleges Information Systems
Association (UK)
• University College London (UK)
• University of Bath (UK)
• University of Edinburgh (UK)
• University of Essex (UK)
• University of Exeter (UK)
• University of Glasgow (UK)
• University of Kent (UK)
• University of Manchester (UK)
• University of Oxford (UK)
• University of Southampton (UK)
• University of St Andrews (UK)
• Higher Education Statistics Agency (UK)
• The UK’s Research and Education Network (UK)
• King’s College (UK)
• Medical Research Council (UK)
• Mimas (UK)
• Moore Answers Ltd. (UK)
• Natural Environment Research Council (UK)
• Nature Publishing Group (UK)
• Research Consulting (UK)
• Research Information Network (UK)
• Research Libraries United Kingdom (UK)
• Research Research Limited (UK)
• Scmoller.net (UK)
• Sussex University (UK)
15. ORGANIZATIONS – PARTICIPATING (3/4)
EUROPE UNITED STATES
• International Council for Scientific
and Technical Information (FR)
• The Committee on Data for Science
and Technology (FR)
• Evora University (PT)
• Porto University (PT)
• Universitat de Valencia (ES)
• Karolinska Institute (SE)
15
• American Chemical Society (US)
• American College of Physicians
(US)
• American Geophysical Union (US)
• American Institutes for Research
(US)
• American Physical Society (US)
• American Psychological
Association (US)
• Aries Systems Corp (US)
• Autism Speaks (US)
• Columbia University (US)
• Cornell University (US)
• Environmental Protections Agency
(US)
• Food and Drug Administration (US)
• Hypothes.is (US)
• Leidos (US)
• Medical University of South
Carolina (US)
• MIT Libraries (US)
• National Institutes of Health (US)
• National Science Foundation (US)
• OCLC Research (US)
• Office of Scientific and Technical
Information (US)
• Oregon Health & Science
University (US)
• Origin Editorial (US)
16. ORGANIZATIONS – PARTICIPATING (4/4)
UNITED STATES
16
OTHER
• Ministry of Business Innovation &
Employment (NZ)
• The University of Hong Kong (HK)
• PeerJ (US)
• PLOS (US)
• Rubriq (US)
• Science/AAAS (US)
• ScienceOpen Inc. (US)
• SHARE (US)
• Sideview (US)
• Smithsonian Institution (US)
• Smithsonian Libraries (US)
• The Winnower (US)
• Twin Arch Technologies
(US)
• University of California San
Francisco (US)
• USDA/NAL (US)
• Washington University (US)
• Wiley (US)
17. RECIPE FOR CASRAI SUCCESS
INGREDIENTS
From content stakeholders (institutions, libraries, funders,
governments)
• 1 part shared financial investment
• 2 to 3 parts strong leadership
• 10 to 15 parts keen subject matter expertise
• broad community review (to taste)
From CASRAI office (facilitation, coordination, analysis)
• 1 part harmonization analysis
• 1 part coordination/support
• 1 part dissemination
• 1 part external subject matter experts (if needed)
From software stakeholders (IT departments, vendors, other data
suppliers)
• Technical modelling (to taste)
• Technology implementation (to taste)
17
PROCEDURE
Mix strong leadership and subject
matter expertise (external if needed)
in a small project. Knead a simple
information agreement until ready for
review (some tougher subjects may
need more kneading - results may
vary). Place into broad open review
and let rise. Trim edges and further
shape before packaging in
technology. Place in maintenance
fridge - good for 1 to 5 years. Meet
regularly to monitor freshness.
21. UPCOMING CASRAI PROJECTS
• Snowball Metrics (UK/US/AUS Institutions / ELSEVIER)
• National CV standards (NL Institutions & Funders)
• Data Management Plans (Jisc / UK Institutions)
• Open Access Reporting (UK, COAR)
21
22. CANADIAN PROJECTS
• Portfolio Classification (Quebec / Alberta leading)
• Impact Reporting (Alberta leading)
• Common Funding Announcements (uToronto / NSERC/SSHRC leading)
• Research Admin KPI - Interest Group (uGuelph leading)
22
23. UPCOMING AT CASRAI
• Co-Projects: when subject matter overlaps
• Research Data Intersect Group: RDA/CASRAI linkage
• De-chapterizing: more fluid, informal stakeholder structures
• Membership Drive: lower rates, more options (to reflect our growth)
23
24. WHERE CASRAI ADDS VALUE
• Neutral body convening/facilitating the table
• Known community leaders (chairs) as champions coordinators (volition)
• Representative subject experts (working groups) focus on the content
• Scope containment - small projects that fit into a larger whole
• Unambiguous agreements for IT/software experts
• Standardize the policy agreements - a common reporting format
• Least imperfect solution to a hard problem
24
25. HOW YOU CAN HELP
• Join CASRAI – the whole idea depends upon the network effect
• Take a look at existing projects and see where they fit your strategy
• Launch new CASRAI projects to solve key local challenges
25