The Culture Fair Intelligence Test (CFIT) was conceived by Raymond B. Cattell in 1920s. It is a nonverbal instrument to measure your analytical and reasoning ability in the abstract and novel situations. The test includes mazes, classifications, conditions and series. Such problems are believed to be common with all cultures. That’s the reason that the testing industry claims it free from all cultural influences.
Please let me know if you are interested to purchase CFIT.
Looking for customized in-house training sessions that fit your needs, particularly in the Philippines? Please send me an email at clarencegapostol@gmail.com or WhatsApp +971507678124. When your request is received I will follow up with you as soon as possible.Thank you!
TỔNG ÔN TẬP THI VÀO LỚP 10 MÔN TIẾNG ANH NĂM HỌC 2023 - 2024 CÓ ĐÁP ÁN (NGỮ Â...
Culture Fair Intelligence Test (CFIT) Manual
1. Culture Fair Intelligence Tests
(CFIT)
by Raymond B. Cattell
A. Karen S. Cattell
Slides created by
Clarence G. Apostol
MA in Counseling Psychology
De La Salle University-Manila
CPS 560M:
Assessment Tools in Counseling
2. Introduction
Raymond B. Cattell divided general intelligence into
two distinct types: crystallized and fluid.
Crystallized intelligence represents knowledge
acquired through experience.
Tests of crystallized intelligence, such as verbal
memory and general knowledge, are thought to reflect
the influence of culture and schooling.
Fluid intelligence represents the biological ability to
acquire knowledge and solve problems.
Tests that reflect fluid intelligence, such as reasoning
speed, spatial reasoning, and inductive reasoning, are
thought to reflect intelligence independent of learning.
Cattell developed a “culture-fair” test to measure fluid
intelligence.
3. Purpose:
The Culture Fair Intelligence Tests measures
individual intelligence in a manner designed to
reduced, as much as possible, the influence of
verbal fluency, cultural climate, and educational
level.
The tests, which may be administered individually
or in a group, are non-verbal and require only the
examinees be able to perceive relationships in
shapes and figures.
Each scale contains 4 subtests involving different
perceptual tasks, so that the composite intelligence
measure avoids spurious reliance on a single skill.
4. Purpose:
It aids in the identification of learning
problems and helps in making more
reliable and informed decisions in relation
to the special education needs of children.
Other uses include selecting students for
accelerated educational programs, advising
students as to probable success in college,
and increasing effectiveness of vocational
guidance decisions, for both students and
adults.
5. History
late 1920’s-Began in the work undertaken by
Cattell, sparked the precise scientific research of
Charles Spearman into the nature and accurate
measurement of intelligence.
1930-resulted in the publication of the Cattell
Group and Inventory (particularly intended for
use with children) were revised and recast into
non-verbal form to diminish the unwanted and
unnecessary effects of verbal fluency in the pure
measurement of intelligence
6. History
1940-another revision of the test appeared. Items
had become completely perceptual and were
organized into 6 subtest, 3 of which have been
retained in the present format. Of the 159 items
analyzes, 72 of satisfactory validity and reliability
were retained for the published edition
1949-another revision and adopted the format
consisting of 4 subtest (Series, Classification,
Matrices and Conditions)
1961-primary outcome of this revision were slight
adjustments in the difficulty level and sequencing
of few items. At the same time the few samples
were expanded to achieve better national
representation in the final tables.
7. Age/Range:
Scale 1: 4 to 8 years and older, mentally
handicapped individuals
Scale 2: 8-14 years and average adults
Scale 3: 14 to college students and adults
of superior intelligence
Requirements for Purchase:
Level B
8. Requirements for Purchase
(Philippine Psychological Corporation, 1995)
LEVEL A- available if the person administering the
tests had undergraduate courses in testing or
psychometrics, or sufficient training and experience
in test administration.
LEVEL B- available only if the test administrator
has completed an advanced level course in testing
in a university, or its equivalent in training under
the direction of a qualified superior or consultant
LEVEL C- available only for use, by, or under the
supervision of qualified psychologists, i.e. members
of APA or the PAP or other persons with at least a
Master’s Degree in psychology and at least one year
experience under professional supervision
9. Reliability:
Scale 1 = .91, Scale 2 = .87,
Scale 3: Consistency Over
• 0.85 Items (1477 M & F) high school-college students
• 0.82 Length (402 M & F) high school-college students
0.82 Time (1323 M & F) high school-college students
10. Validity: Scale 3
Concept Validity
• Direct correlations with the pure intelligence factor
(0.92), 702 male and female students
Concrete Validity
• Correlations with other tests of general intelligence
including the OTIS, SAT, and Intelligence Structure
Test (0.69), 673 male and females (students and
young adults)
12. Description of the Subtest:
Subtest 1: Series- the individual is
presented with an incomplete, progressive
matrices. His task is to select, from
among the choices provided, the answer
which best continue the series.
13. Description of the Subtest:
Subtest 2:Classifications- the
individual is presented with 5 figures. In
scale 2, he must select one which is
different from the other four. In scale 3,
he must correctly identify two figures
which are in some way different from
three others.
14. Description of the Subtest:
Subtest 3: Matrices- the task is to correctly
complete the design or matrix presented at the
left of each row.
15. Description of the Subtest:
Subtest 4: Conditions (topology), requires
the individual to select, from the 5 choices
provided, the one which duplicates the
conditions given in the far left box. For example,
the test taker must select the figure in which it
is possible to place a dot that would lie outside
the box but inside the circle. Only choice 3
meets theses requirements and is therefore the
correct answer.
16. Administration
Test 1. (3 minutes)
• At the left there are four little boxes. The last one is
empty. Continuing along that row, you see six more boxes,
marked a, b, c, d, e and f. of those six boxes, one will fit
correctly in the empty box. (after 3 minutes, say STOP!
Pencils down)
Test 2. (4 minutes)
• Three of the boxes in each example have shapes that are
alike in some way, but the other two are different from these
three. In each row, you are to find the two boxes that are
different from the others. When you have found them, fill in
on your answer sheet the two boxes that have the same
letters under them as the answers you have chosen. (after 4
minutes, say STOP! Pencils down)
17. Administration
Test 3. (3 minutes)
• In the large square, there are four little boxes. Three of
the boxes have drawings in them, but the drawing for the
other square is missing. One of the boxes in the row at the
right fits correctly in the empty box. You are to choose the
right one and mark the answer on your answer sheet.
(after 3 minutes, say STOP! Pencils down)
Test 4. (2.5 minutes)
• In the separate square of the first example, there is dot
which is in both the circle and the square. Now look at the
five possible answers and see if you can find a drawing
where you could put in one dot that will be inside both the
circle and square. (after 2 and ½ minutes, say STOP!
Pencils down)
20. Percentile Classification
97-99 Very Superior
90-96 Superior
75-89 Above Average
60-74 High Average
40-59 Average
10-23 Low Average
24-39 Below Average
4-9 Low
1-3 Very Low
23. Sample Interpretation # 3
The client garnered a “superior” score on the
Culture Fair Intelligence Test, manifesting her
aptitude to perform job-related tasks that
involved cognitive ability.
Sample Interpretation # 4
The client garnered a “low average” score on
the Culture Fair Intelligence Test indicating her
slight ineptness in perceiving relationships in
shapes and in figures.
24. Sample Interpretation # 5
Meanwhile, an “above average” score was
obtained by the applicant on the Culture Fair
Intelligence Tests which revealed her ability with
different perceptual tasks that measure her
composite non-verbal intelligence.
Sample Interpretation # 6
The client garnered a “below average” score on
the Culture Fair Intelligence Tests which signifies
his ineptness in establishing relationships in
shapes and in figures.
25. Sample Interpretation # 7
The applicant falls on the “average” category on
the Culture Fair Intelligence Tests, signifying her
proficiency to execute job related tasks that
involve cognitive ability as well as perceiving
relationships in shapes and in figures.
Sample Interpretation # 8
The client obtained a “High Average” score on the
Culture Fair Intelligence Tests, signifying his
adeptness to performed job related tasks that
involved cognitive ability.
26. Criticism: Culture & IQ
IQ tests have been criticized for being biased in
favor of white, middle-class people.
However, efforts to construct culture-free and
culture-fair tests have been disappointing.
Culture affects nearly everything to do with
taking a test, from attitudes to problem-solving
strategies.
Negative stereotypes about a person’s ethnicity,
gender, or age may cause the person to suffer
stereotype threat, a burden of doubt about his or
her own abilities, which can lead to anxiety or
"disidentification" with the test.