SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 94
Download to read offline
JOB ANALYSIS, EVALUATION AND –
GRADING – PROCESSES AND TOOLS
CHARLES COTTER
www.slideshare.net/CharlesCotter
BIRCHWOOD HOTEL AND CONFERENCE CENTRE
3-4 APRIL 2017
TRAINING PROGRAMME OVERVIEW –
DAY 1
• Defining the fundamental concepts
• Building a business case for Job Analysis – the utility and functional value thereof
• Unpacking the key components of Job Analysis process
• Diagnosis of current Job Analysis practices:
 Efficiency
 Methods/techniques
• Applying the 5-step, Job Analysis process:
 Developing a Job Description
 Developing a Job Specification
• Case study: Job Analysis (Excitor)
TRAINING PROGRAMME OVERVIEW –
DAY 2
• Defining the fundamental concepts
• Building a business case for Job Evaluation – the utility and functional value
thereof
• Review and application of Job Evaluation systems:
 Hay Group
 Peromnes
 JE Manager
 T.A.S.K.
 Paterson
 EQUATE
 Towers Watson GGS
• Case study: Job Evaluation (World Vision)
• Integration of job analysis, -evaluation and compensation structure
Job Analysis_Evaluation_Grading_Process and Tools
INTRODUCTORY ACTIVITY
• Complete the following statement by inserting one
word only. In order to be an effective Job Analyst, I
need to/to be………………………………………………………
• Jot this word down and find other learners who have
written down the same word.
• Write this word down on the flip-chart.
• You’ll be given the opportunity to substantiate your
choice of word.
Job Analysis_Evaluation_Grading_Process and Tools
SUB-COMPONENTS OF COMPETENCE
COMPETENCE
• “Applied Competence is the union of practical, foundational and reflexive
competence”
• Practical Competence - the demonstrated ability to perform a set of tasks in an
authentic context. A range of actions or possibilities is considered and decisions
are made about which actions to follow and to perform the chosen action.
• Foundational Competence - the demonstrated understanding of what the learner
is doing and why. This underpins the practical competence and therefore the
actions taken.
• Reflexive Competence - the learner demonstrates the ability to integrate or
connect performance with understanding so as to show that s/he is able to adapt
to changed circumstances appropriately and responsibly, and to explain the reason
behind an action.
• Thus competence is understood as including the individual’s learning,
understanding and ability to transfer and apply learned skills and knowledge
across a wide range of work contexts.
THE PURPOSE AND INTENTION OF A
JOB ANALYSIS
• What is the need of the job to exist?
• What physical and mental activities does the
worker undertake?
• When is the job to be performed?
• Where is the job to be performed?
• How does the job performed by an employee?
• What qualities and qualifications are required
to perform the job?
PRINCIPLES OF JOB ANALYSIS
• The purpose of job analysis is to identify and describe,
in a systemic and comprehensive manner;
• Job analysis is not a study of the workers, but of their
activities and what is required to perform those
activities;
• Job titles should not lead the analyst into assumptions
about job duties; and
• In a job that involves the use of machinery, the analyst
should distinguish between what the worker does and
what “gets” done.
UTILITY AND FUNCTIONAL VALUE OF JOB
ANALYSIS – APPLIED TO HR VALUE CHAIN
Job Analysis_Evaluation_Grading_Process and Tools
Job Analysis_Evaluation_Grading_Process and Tools
Job Analysis_Evaluation_Grading_Process and Tools
LEARNING ACTIVITY 1
• Group discussion
• Build a business case for Job Analysis.
Describe the utility and functional value, applied to
the HR Value Chain.
Do the benefits of Job Analysis outweigh the costs?
Is Job Analysis viable, feasible and sustainable.
• Provide feedback in the form of summary
Job Analysis_Evaluation_Grading_Process and Tools
JOB DATA
• The job’s context/environment
• The job’s tasks and duties
• Performance standards
• Tools and Equipment
• Relationships
• Job Requirements (KSAE)
Job Analysis_Evaluation_Grading_Process and Tools
Job Analysis_Evaluation_Grading_Process and Tools
QUALITATIVE METHODS OF JOB DATA
COLLECTION
LEARNING ACTIVITY 2
• Group discussion
• Diagnosis of current Job Analysis practices/processes.
 Review your current organizational Job Analysis practices and
processes and indicate the efficiency and effectiveness. Identify gaps
and recommend improvement strategies.
• Diagnosis of current Job Analysis data collection
methods/techniques.
 Review your current organizational Job Analysis quantitative and
qualitative methods and techniques and indicate their effectiveness,
reliability and validity. Identify gaps and recommend improvement
strategies.
• Provide feedback in the form of summary
5-STEP, JOB ANALYSIS PROCESS
PHASES OF JOB ANALYSIS (P-D-C-A)
STEP 1: PLANNING THE JOB ANALYSIS
• The key actions of step 1 are listed below:
Identify the purpose of a Job Analysis
Identify the objectives of a Job Analysis
Obtain top management support
STEP 2: PREPARING FOR AND
INTRODUCING JOB ANALYSIS
• The key actions of step 2 are listed below:
Identify jobs
Identify methods and techniques
Review existing job documentation
Developing Implementation (Action) Plan
Communicate process to management and
employees
JOB ANALYSIS IMPLEMENTATION
(ACTION) PLAN
LEARNING ACTIVITY 3
• Group discussion
• Apply steps 1 and 2 (PLAN) of the Job Analysis
process to a defined organizational context:
Step 1: Planning the Job Analysis
Step 2: Preparing for and Introducing Job Analysis
• Provide feedback in the form of summary
STEP 3: CONDUCTING JOB ANALYSIS
STEP 3: CONDUCTING JOB ANALYSIS
• The key actions of step 3 are listed below:
Gather job analysis data
Analyze and interpret data
Review, verify & compile data
STEP 3: DEVELOPING A JOB ANALYSIS
MATRIX - FOCAL POINTS
STEP 3: CONDUCTING JOB ANALYSIS -
PROCESS
Job Analysis_Evaluation_Grading_Process and Tools
Job Analysis_Evaluation_Grading_Process and Tools
STEP 4: DEVELOPING JOB DESCRIPTIONS
AND JOB SPECIFICATIONS
• The key actions of step 4 are listed below:
Draft Job Descriptions and Job Specifications
Review drafts with managers and employees
Finalize job descriptions and recommendations
Job Analysis_Evaluation_Grading_Process and Tools
Job Analysis_Evaluation_Grading_Process and Tools
Job Analysis_Evaluation_Grading_Process and Tools
STEP 4: DEVELOPING JOB DESCRIPTIONS AND
JOB SPECIFICATIONS
• Writing Job Descriptions
• The process of job writing
• Who is involved in the process of job description writing?
• Planning the job writing process
• Preparing for the interview
• Putting the interviewee at ease
• Gathering all the administrative details and contextual information
• Gathering all the appropriate information regarding the purpose, functions and tasks of the
job
• Summary of Do’s and Don’ts
LEARNING ACTIVITY 4
• Group discussion
• Identify a critical job in your organization. Apply
steps 3-4 (DO) of the Job Analysis process to a
defined organizational context.
Job Description
Job Specification
• Provide feedback in the form of summary
STEP 5: MAINTAINING AND UPDATING JOB
DESCRIPTIONS AND JOB SPECIFICATIONS
STEP 5: MAINTAINING AND UPDATING JOB
DESCRIPTIONS AND JOB SPECIFICATIONS
• The key activities of step 5 are:
Update job descriptions and job specifications as
the organization changes
Periodically review all jobs
LEARNING ACTIVITY 5
• Group discussion
• By referring to the identified, critical job in
your organization, apply step 5 (CHECK and
ACT) of the Job Analysis process.
• Provide feedback in the form of summary
Job Analysis_Evaluation_Grading_Process and Tools
LEARNING INTEGRATION – CASE
STUDY 1
• Syndicate group case analysis and feedback:
• Apply the theoretical principles to the Excitor
case study.
CASE STUDY 1: DEVELOPING A COMPLETE PLAN
FOR JOB ANALYSIS (EXCITOR)
• 1. Identify the purpose and objectives of the job analysis.
• 2. Identify some of the 2.1) elements and 2.2) practical considerations that
influence the choice/selection of the job analysis method/s.
• 3. Do you believe that the consultant’s proposed hybrid of job analysis
methods is appropriate (best fit)? Justify your response.
• 4. Identify a few sources of job analysis data utilized by the consultant.
• 5. Identify the primary data collection methods utilized by the consultant. Do
you believe that the consultant strike the right balance of quantitative
(analytical) and qualitative (non-analytical) methods? Justify your response.
• 6. Do you believe that the consultant’s sample size and composition (of
employees and managers) and related rationale is sensible, given the
requirements of viability, feasibility, practicality and the need to comply with the
scientific principles of reliability and representivity? Justify your response.
CASE STUDY 1: DEVELOPING A COMPLETE PLAN
FOR JOB ANALYSIS (EXCITOR)
• 7. Do you regard the consultant’s data collection, collation, analysis,
interpretation, validation and reporting 7.1) efficient and 7.2) effective?
Justify your response.
• 8. Do you believe that the consultant excelled with the crafting and
drafting of the 8.1) Job Description and 8.2) Job Specification
documents? Justify your response.
• 9. Do you believe that the consultant complied with and followed the
client’s brief and ultimately, met their needs and expectations? Justify
your response.
• 10. Do you believe that the consultant applied the 5-step Job Analysis
process effectively? Justify your response. Would you recommend any
improvements to their methodology and/or process?
• 11. As a job analyst and/or HR Manager what are the lessons that you
can extract from this case study.
CONCLUSION – DAY 1
• Key points
• Summary
• Questions
Job Analysis_Evaluation_Grading_Process and Tools
DEFINITION, PURPOSE AND
OBJECTIVES OF JOB EVALUATION
• Job Evaluation is the process of determining as systematically and
objectively as possible, the worth of one job relative to another
without regard for personalities or existing structures.
• It tries to make a systematic comparison between jobs to assess
their relative worth for the purpose of establishing a rational pay
structure.
• The purpose is to achieve and maintain an equitable distribution
of basic wages and/or salaries according to level of position.
• The main objectives of such an exercise can be stated as “the
establishment of internal equity with a graded hierarchy of jobs
within the organization and of external equity with the external
market rate for equivalent jobs”.
Job Analysis_Evaluation_Grading_Process and Tools
Job Analysis_Evaluation_Grading_Process and Tools
CRITICAL SUCCESS FACTORS AND BEST
PRACTICE PRINCIPLES OF JOB EVALUATION
• Selection of a system of job evaluation
• Selling the concept and the system to management and employees
• Designing the job description forms in accordance with company
requirements
• Deciding on how job descriptions are to be written
• Training those people who will write job descriptions and the
Grading Committee
• Monitoring the quality of job descriptions
Job Analysis_Evaluation_Grading_Process and Tools
Job Analysis_Evaluation_Grading_Process and Tools
JOB EVALUATION PROCESS
• Stage 1 is the inflexible part of the process. Although there
is a degree of flexibility in any job evaluation method, one
must observe the grading rules if the system is to retain its
credibility. This stage consists of:
Writing the job descriptions in an agreed format
Grading of the job description by a trained representative
committee using the job evaluation rules
• Stage 2 is where flexibility must be built into the
remuneration system. This stage consists of:
Development of wage and salary structuring, benefits and
incentives within the framework of the market rates, company
policy and ability to pay.
JOB EVALUATION PROCESS -
ILLUSTRATED
CRITERIA INFORMING THE SELECTION OF
THE JOB EVALUATION SYSTEM – 3E’s
• Management and staff must understand it; be
committed to it and accept it - EMPOWERED
• Implementation can be quick - EXPEDIENCY
• Updating and maintaining the system will be
quick and easy - EFFICIENCY
Job Analysis_Evaluation_Grading_Process and Tools
PROMINENT JOB EVALUATION
SYSTEMS
• Hay Group
• Peromnes
• JE Manager/Decision Tree
• T.A.S.K.
• Paterson
• EQUATE
• Towers Watson GGS
Job Analysis_Evaluation_Grading_Process and Tools
Job Analysis_Evaluation_Grading_Process and Tools
HAY JOB EVALUATION METHOD
• Hay Group pioneered the “factor comparison” job evaluation method and
modified it in its Guide Charts in the early 1950’s.
• Organizations use the Hay methodology to evaluate jobs against a set of
common factors that measure:
 Inputs (required knowledge, skills, and capabilities),
 Throughputs (processing of inputs to achieve results)
 Outputs (end result expectations from applying inputs constructively)
• During the evaluation process, each job’s content is analyzed relative to
each factor and represented by a numerical value. These factor values are
then totaled to determine the overall job “size.”
• The input-throughput-output model is reflected in the Hay Method as
Know-How, Problem Solving and Accountability. Each grouping can be
further broken down into eight elements for the work value assessment.
HAY JOB EVALUATION FACTORS
• Accountability (has three dimensions):
 Freedom to Act
 Scope
 Impact
• Know-How (has three dimensions):
 Technical/Specialized Skills
 Managerial Skills
 Human Relations Skills
• Problem Solving (has two dimensions):
 Thinking Environment
 Thinking Challenge
HAY JOB EVALUATION FACTORS -
ILLUSTRATED
HAY JOB EVALUATION GUIDE CHARTS
• The Guide Charts enable consistent work evaluations. Each of the factors—Know-
How, Problem Solving, and Accountability— has its own Guide Chart that reflects
the identified sub elements.
• Each Guide Chart scale is expandable to account for the complexity and size of the
organization to which it is applied, and the scale descriptions can be modified
when appropriate.
• An important distinction is that the Hay Methodology can be calibrated to the
value systems of other organizations within Hay’s compensation databases. This
enables a wide range of benchmarking activities, potentially improving the
accuracy of market pricing and increasing confidence in job evaluation results.
• Guide Charts expedite the job evaluation process, but considerable expertise is
required to understand the work’s nature to determine the degree to which
elements exist for each factor.
• The power is not only in the tool, but also in the evaluator’s knowledge and skill
and the consistency in the tool’s application across the organization.
PEROMNES
• Peromnes grades show the rank order of jobs within
an organization and allow jobs to be compared by
grade with other jobs both inside and outside the
organization.
• Peromnes evaluates and scores jobs in terms of eight
factors. These factors are intrinsic to jobs, do not
measure aspects outside the job and are applicable to
all jobs in terms of function and level in organization.
• The first six evaluate tasks, skills, responsibilities and
relationships (job content) and the last two evaluate
education and further training and experience (job
requirements).
PEROMNES JOB EVALUATION
FACTORS
• Factor 1: Problem Solving
• Factor 2: Consequence of Judgments
• Factor 3: Pressure of Work
• Factor 4: Knowledge
• Factor 5: Job Impact
• Factor 6: Comprehension
• Factor 7: Educational Qualifications
• Factor 8: Further Training/Experience:
JE MANAGER/DT
• JE Manager is a computerized system designed to eliminate human bias and has
various checks and controls to ensure consistency of results.
• It is transparent as it involves the job holder; the incumbent (where the post is
occupied) to personally answers questions required by the system.
• The system is also non-discriminatory in that the same set of factors, questions,
and parameters are used to measure each job regardless of the incumbent.
• The JE Manager process empowers employees in that they are directly involved in
their own evaluations together with their line managers.
• The system also takes into account the individual and the individual’s role in
adding value to the organization more than other job evaluation system.
• The system recognizes applied competencies acquired formally or informally
without placing an undue emphasis on either.
JE MANAGER/DT
• It also avoids placing an undue emphasis on hierarchical positions or
theoretical number of people supervised and the system specifically
recognizes the specialist roles.
• The system is designed for maximum flexibility allowing full
customization to fit the culture, value system and organization structure.
• JE Manager supports flexible pay structures and can be linked to
competencies and performance management systems.
• The system substantially reduces evaluation time. It reduces the time
span between a request for an evaluation and the evaluation itself.
• No job evaluation committee is required and the time spent on each
evaluation is considerably less than traditional methods.
JE MANAGER/DT FACTORS
• Hay Group’s Decision Tree is a powerful, reliable and user-friendly web-based tool
that simplifies the overall JE process.
• The Decision Tree system helps organizations to build a database of job profiles,
evaluate and validate jobs (online checks and balances), maintain, share, export
and archive information and produce a wide-range of value-add reports.
• The JE Manager measures six factors each on a bi-dimensional basis (X & Y):
 Factor 1: Judgment
 Factor 2: Planning and leadership
 Factor 3: Communication
 Factor 4: Job impact
 Factor 5: Acquisition and application of knowledge
 Factor 6: Skills acquisition and practice
JE MANAGER/DT PROCESS
• Evaluation is done by a trained evaluator on a question and answer basis prompted by the
program. In attendance at the evaluation are the following role-players:
 The incumbent ;
 The incumbents line manager ;
 The evaluator ; and
 The incumbents representative (e.g. from a union), if so requested by the incumbent.
• After the evaluation, the results are sent, without alteration, to be audited by an audit committee.
The purpose of the audit is to validate the evaluation result and to ensure internal equity of jobs
within the organization.
• The audit committee is empowered to increase or decrease the evaluation scores, based on sound
reason, in terms of the aforementioned objectives of validity and equity.
• The audit committee is composed of the following four members:
 A Chairman, from the Human Resources Department;
 A Human Resources evaluation officer;
 A representative from the department whose post is being audited; and
 A representative from one other department (but not from the Human Resources Department).
JE MANAGER/DT PROCESS
• Should the incumbent consider that the post has been
inappropriately graded, he/she may appeal against the evaluation.
• An appeal committee will be constituted to consider the appeal.
• The appeal committee may not be composed of members who
audited the post originally.
• The appeal committee, after hearing the appeal, may recommend
the following:
 No change to the grade(status quo) ;
 Re-evaluate the job ; and
 Revise the grade.
T.A.S.K. JOB EVALUATION
• Tuned Assessment of Skills and Knowledge
(T.A.S.K.)
• A Patterson plan derivative, the T.A.S.K.
system that uses a point system with a
number of factors for sub grading (skill level,
knowledge, complexity, influence, pressure
to address the problem of sub grading.
T.A.S.K. JOB EVALUATION PROCESS
• The T.A.S.K. job evaluation system evaluates jobs from grade 1 up
to grade 26, where grade 1 will be the lowest job and grade 26 the
highest job.
• The T.A.S.K. system is based on the skill level requirements of jobs
at all levels and in all functions in an organization.
• All jobs, throughout an organization, can be classified into skill
levels according to established standards.
• To arrive at a job grade the following procedure must be follow:
 Determine the skill level of the job;
 Determine the points ranges for each of the four factors - Complexity,
Knowledge, Influence and Pressure; and
 Determine actual points per range by answering sub factor questions.
T.A.S.K. JOB EVALUATION SKILL
LEVELS
• The T.A.S.K. job evaluation system categorizes
jobs in 5 skill levels:
Level 1: Basic Skills
Level 2: Discretionary Skills
Level 3: Specialized Skills
Level 4: Tactical Skills
Skill 5: Strategic skills
T.A.S.K. JOB EVALUATION FACTORS
• After the skill level of a post has been
determined, the post is then rated against four
factors:
Complexity
Knowledge
Influence
Pressure
Job Analysis_Evaluation_Grading_Process and Tools
PATERSON GRADING SYSTEM
• The basic premise of the method is that all jobs, regardless of level,
industry or country, can be compared in terms of the number and
weight of decisions that must be made by the job incumbent.
• From this comparison a pay structure can be established.
• Paterson maintains that an organization’s pay structure should
reflect the organization and responsibility levels within the
organization, and that responsibility should be measured and
compared in terms of a single factor common to all jobs, namely,
decision-making.
• Paterson defines six kinds of Bands of decision, which are found in
any company. Any job can be defined in terms of these Bands of
decision and the authority relationships, which are involved.
PATERSON GRADING SYSTEM BANDS
OF DECISIONS
• BAND F: Policy Making Decisions (Top Management)
• BAND E: Programming Decisions (Senior Management)
• BAND D: Interpretive Decisions (Middle Management and High
Level Specialists)
• BAND C: Routine/Process/System Decisions (Specialist or Skilled
Employees)
• BAND B: Automatic/Operative/Sub-system (Partially skilled
employees)
• BAND A: Defined Decisions (Basic Skilled Employees)
PATERSON FACTORS
• Factor 1: Decision-making/responsibility/judgment (Used for
Banding)
• Factor 2: Supervision/coordination of people/work (Used for sub-
Banding)
• Factor 3: Complexity of tasks (Used for sub-Banding)
• Factor 4: Variety of tasks (Used for sub-Banding)
• Factor 5: Degree of precision required (Used for sub-Banding)
• Factor 6: Work pressure/physical effort (Used for sub-Banding)
BANDS KIND OF DECISION LEVEL DESCRIPTOR 11 SUB-GRADES KIND OF GRADE
F Policy Making Top Management 11
10
Co-ordinating or Supervisory Policy
Policy
E Programming Senior Management 9
8
Co-ordinating or Supervisory
Programming
Programming
D Interpretive/
Probabilistic
Middle
Management
(Expert)
(Specialist)
(Professional)
7
6
Supervisory
Interpretive
Interpretive
C Routine/Process/
System
Skilled
(Specialist)
(Professional)
5
4
Supervisory
Skilled
Skilled
B Automatic/
Operative/
Sub-system
Partially
Skilled
3
2
Supervisory
Partially skilled
Partially skilled
A Defined Basic Skilled 1 Defined
6 BROAD
BANDS
11
SUB-GRADES
28
SUB-GRADES
F
11 Policy Co-ordinating F5
F4
10 Policy F3
F2
F1
E
9 Programming Co-ordinating E5
E4
8 Programming E3
E2
E1
D
7. Interpretive Co-ordinating D5
D4
6 Interpretive D3
D2
D1
C
5. Skilled/Specialist Co-ordinating C5
C4
4 Skilled/Specialist C3
C2
C1
B
3. Partially skilled Co-ordinating B5
B4
2 Partially skilled B3
B2
B1
A
1. Basic skilled No Co-ordinating
Sub-division
A3
A2
A1
EQUATE FACTORS
• Responsibility
• Thinking Demands
• Communication and Contacts
• Knowledge
• Environmental Demands
TOWERS WATSON GLOBAL GRADING
SYSTEM (GGS)
• Towers Watson’s systematic approach to job leveling helps organizations manage
the opportunities and challenges of talent and reward program design including
aligning jobs located in multiple regions or across different lines of business, or
creating a career framework that integrates employees after a merger, acquisition
or other structural change.
• Job leveling is an analytical process that can determine the relative value of jobs in
your organization, and it provides a foundation for reward and talent
management programs
• The Global Grade calculator allows you to grade jobs following the proprietary
Towers Watson Global Grading methodology using three key steps:
 Scope of the business
 Band for the job
 Grade for the job
• The Global Grades generated by the calculator correlate with those included in the
Towers Watson compensation surveys providing a valuable reference when
assessing the competitiveness of reward packages.
JOB EVALUATION SYSTEMS -
COMPARISON
APPLYING PATERSON JOB EVALUATION
AND GRADING PROCEDURE
• Writing the Job Description
• Job Grading – Band the Job Descriptions (Step 1)
• Grading of Supervisory Tasks (Step 2)
• Sub-grading of Jobs (Step 3):
variety and complexity of tasks
precision
pressure of work/physical effort
LEARNING ACTIVITY 7
• Group discussion
Evaluate the relative merits of each of the
prominent Job Evaluation systems. Which one do
you favour? Justify your decision.
Apply the selected/preferred Job Evaluation
system to an identified position.
• Provide feedback in the form of summary
Job Analysis_Evaluation_Grading_Process and Tools
LEARNING INTEGRATION – CASE
STUDY
• Syndicate group case analysis and feedback:
• Apply the theoretical principles to the World
Vision case study.
CASE STUDY 2: JOB EVALUATION AT WORLD
VISION (BY MEANS OF JE MANAGER)
• 1. Identify the purpose and objectives of conducting the job
evaluation at World Vision.
• 2. By reviewing the old/previous system, perform a gap analysis i.e.
identify the required areas of improvement at World Vision.
• 3. Evaluate the effectiveness of the Hay Group JE Manager system in
adequately addressing these gaps (identified in question 2).
• 4. Identify at least three (3) job factors of the Hay Group JE Manager
system which are used to evaluate and grade jobs at World Vision.
• 5. List at least five (5) benefits that accrued to World Vision from
applying the JE Manager job evaluation system. Which benefit would
you regard as the most significant (highest value)? Justify your view.
• 6. As a job evaluator and/or HR Manager what are the lessons that
you can extract from this case study.
LEARNING ACTIVITY 8
• Syndicate group discussion
• Develop a strategic HRM framework in which
your organization can harmonize the job
analysis, -evaluation and compensation
structure processes.
• Present your framework in the form of
summarized feedback.
Job Analysis_Evaluation_Grading_Process and Tools
CONCLUSION – DAY 2
• Key points
• Summary
• Questions
• Certification
CONTACT DETAILS
• Charles Cotter
• (+27) 84 562 9446
• charlescot@polka.co.za
• LinkedIn
• Twitter: @Charles_Cotter
• http://www.slideshare.net/CharlesCotter

More Related Content

What's hot

Job evaluation and grading – process and systems
Job evaluation and grading  – process and systemsJob evaluation and grading  – process and systems
Job evaluation and grading – process and systemsCharles Cotter, PhD
 
Job Evaluation & Grading
Job Evaluation & GradingJob Evaluation & Grading
Job Evaluation & Gradingomarterani
 
Hay guide chart.pptx [autosaved]
Hay guide chart.pptx [autosaved]Hay guide chart.pptx [autosaved]
Hay guide chart.pptx [autosaved]Shivam Srivastava
 
Rewards & recognition
Rewards & recognitionRewards & recognition
Rewards & recognitionAnita Kumari
 
Job Analysis, Job Description, Job Evaluation & Analytics
Job Analysis, Job Description, Job Evaluation & AnalyticsJob Analysis, Job Description, Job Evaluation & Analytics
Job Analysis, Job Description, Job Evaluation & AnalyticsAditi Kirtane
 
Performance Management
Performance ManagementPerformance Management
Performance ManagementGautam Ghosh
 
Performance Management
Performance ManagementPerformance Management
Performance ManagementSheetal Wagh
 
Job Evaluation and Salary Design
Job Evaluation and Salary DesignJob Evaluation and Salary Design
Job Evaluation and Salary DesignSonnie Santos
 
Job Evaluation PPT
Job Evaluation PPTJob Evaluation PPT
Job Evaluation PPTbargave
 
Performance appraisal by a
Performance appraisal by aPerformance appraisal by a
Performance appraisal by aSanjana Shetty
 
Rewards And Recognition
Rewards And RecognitionRewards And Recognition
Rewards And Recognitionrajeevgupta
 
Performance appraisal hrm
Performance appraisal hrmPerformance appraisal hrm
Performance appraisal hrmGajanan Khude
 

What's hot (20)

Job evaluation
Job evaluationJob evaluation
Job evaluation
 
Job evaluation and grading – process and systems
Job evaluation and grading  – process and systemsJob evaluation and grading  – process and systems
Job evaluation and grading – process and systems
 
Hay method of job evaluation
Hay method of job evaluationHay method of job evaluation
Hay method of job evaluation
 
Job Evaluation & Grading
Job Evaluation & GradingJob Evaluation & Grading
Job Evaluation & Grading
 
Hay guide chart.pptx [autosaved]
Hay guide chart.pptx [autosaved]Hay guide chart.pptx [autosaved]
Hay guide chart.pptx [autosaved]
 
Job evaluation
Job evaluationJob evaluation
Job evaluation
 
Rewards & recognition
Rewards & recognitionRewards & recognition
Rewards & recognition
 
Job Analysis, Job Description, Job Evaluation & Analytics
Job Analysis, Job Description, Job Evaluation & AnalyticsJob Analysis, Job Description, Job Evaluation & Analytics
Job Analysis, Job Description, Job Evaluation & Analytics
 
Performance Management
Performance ManagementPerformance Management
Performance Management
 
Job evaluation
Job evaluationJob evaluation
Job evaluation
 
Performance Management
Performance ManagementPerformance Management
Performance Management
 
Job evaluation
Job evaluationJob evaluation
Job evaluation
 
Job Evaluation and Salary Design
Job Evaluation and Salary DesignJob Evaluation and Salary Design
Job Evaluation and Salary Design
 
Job Evaluation PPT
Job Evaluation PPTJob Evaluation PPT
Job Evaluation PPT
 
Succession planning in HRP
Succession planning in HRPSuccession planning in HRP
Succession planning in HRP
 
Job evaluation-ppt
Job evaluation-ppt Job evaluation-ppt
Job evaluation-ppt
 
Performance appraisal by a
Performance appraisal by aPerformance appraisal by a
Performance appraisal by a
 
Rewards And Recognition
Rewards And RecognitionRewards And Recognition
Rewards And Recognition
 
Job evaluation
Job evaluationJob evaluation
Job evaluation
 
Performance appraisal hrm
Performance appraisal hrmPerformance appraisal hrm
Performance appraisal hrm
 

Viewers also liked

Remuneration Strategy and Salary Structuring
Remuneration Strategy and Salary StructuringRemuneration Strategy and Salary Structuring
Remuneration Strategy and Salary StructuringCharles Cotter, PhD
 
HR Risk Management_HRM Auditing_Skills Auditing
HR Risk Management_HRM Auditing_Skills AuditingHR Risk Management_HRM Auditing_Skills Auditing
HR Risk Management_HRM Auditing_Skills AuditingCharles Cotter, PhD
 
الدبلوم العملي في الموارد البشرية
الدبلوم العملي في الموارد البشريةالدبلوم العملي في الموارد البشرية
الدبلوم العملي في الموارد البشريةWalid Al Wakeel
 
Coaching performance coaching_career_coaching
Coaching performance coaching_career_coachingCoaching performance coaching_career_coaching
Coaching performance coaching_career_coachingShankar Myadharaveni
 
دليل تدريب المدرب الاعلامي
دليل تدريب المدرب الاعلامي دليل تدريب المدرب الاعلامي
دليل تدريب المدرب الاعلامي Mamoun Matar
 
The Science of Happiness @Work 2017 Conference
The Science of Happiness @Work 2017 Conference The Science of Happiness @Work 2017 Conference
The Science of Happiness @Work 2017 Conference Charles Cotter, PhD
 
Competency-based Recruitment and Selection Interviewing (CBI) Skills
Competency-based Recruitment and Selection Interviewing (CBI) SkillsCompetency-based Recruitment and Selection Interviewing (CBI) Skills
Competency-based Recruitment and Selection Interviewing (CBI) SkillsCharles Cotter, PhD
 
Performance management – Best Practice Process and Principles
Performance management – Best Practice Process and Principles Performance management – Best Practice Process and Principles
Performance management – Best Practice Process and Principles Charles Cotter, PhD
 
ورشة إدارة الموارد البشرية
ورشة إدارة الموارد البشرية ورشة إدارة الموارد البشرية
ورشة إدارة الموارد البشرية Huda Al Midani
 
الدبلوم العملي في الموارد البشرية
الدبلوم العملي في الموارد البشريةالدبلوم العملي في الموارد البشرية
الدبلوم العملي في الموارد البشريةWalid Al Wakeel
 
Labor law, insurance and tax Workshop
Labor law, insurance and tax Workshop Labor law, insurance and tax Workshop
Labor law, insurance and tax Workshop Walid Al Wakeel
 
HRM | Course | Chapter 1 Wonder Box
HRM | Course | Chapter 1 Wonder BoxHRM | Course | Chapter 1 Wonder Box
HRM | Course | Chapter 1 Wonder BoxAndrew Ashraf
 
Ethics of South African Trainers
Ethics of South African TrainersEthics of South African Trainers
Ethics of South African TrainersCharles Cotter, PhD
 
الفرق بين العولمة والعالمية.Ppt عبد الرحمن تيشوري
الفرق بين العولمة والعالمية.Ppt   عبد الرحمن تيشوريالفرق بين العولمة والعالمية.Ppt   عبد الرحمن تيشوري
الفرق بين العولمة والعالمية.Ppt عبد الرحمن تيشوريAbdullrahman Tayshoori
 
Strategic hr using balance score cards
Strategic hr using balance score cardsStrategic hr using balance score cards
Strategic hr using balance score cardsWalid Al Wakeel
 
Project Leadership and Change Management
Project Leadership and Change Management Project Leadership and Change Management
Project Leadership and Change Management Charles Cotter, PhD
 
Leadership Principles & Practice
Leadership Principles & PracticeLeadership Principles & Practice
Leadership Principles & PracticeCharles Cotter, PhD
 

Viewers also liked (20)

Remuneration Strategy and Salary Structuring
Remuneration Strategy and Salary StructuringRemuneration Strategy and Salary Structuring
Remuneration Strategy and Salary Structuring
 
HR Risk Management_HRM Auditing_Skills Auditing
HR Risk Management_HRM Auditing_Skills AuditingHR Risk Management_HRM Auditing_Skills Auditing
HR Risk Management_HRM Auditing_Skills Auditing
 
الدبلوم العملي في الموارد البشرية
الدبلوم العملي في الموارد البشريةالدبلوم العملي في الموارد البشرية
الدبلوم العملي في الموارد البشرية
 
Coaching performance coaching_career_coaching
Coaching performance coaching_career_coachingCoaching performance coaching_career_coaching
Coaching performance coaching_career_coaching
 
HRM Metrics and Analytics
HRM Metrics and Analytics HRM Metrics and Analytics
HRM Metrics and Analytics
 
Advanced hr diploma
Advanced hr diplomaAdvanced hr diploma
Advanced hr diploma
 
دليل تدريب المدرب الاعلامي
دليل تدريب المدرب الاعلامي دليل تدريب المدرب الاعلامي
دليل تدريب المدرب الاعلامي
 
The Science of Happiness @Work 2017 Conference
The Science of Happiness @Work 2017 Conference The Science of Happiness @Work 2017 Conference
The Science of Happiness @Work 2017 Conference
 
Competency-based Recruitment and Selection Interviewing (CBI) Skills
Competency-based Recruitment and Selection Interviewing (CBI) SkillsCompetency-based Recruitment and Selection Interviewing (CBI) Skills
Competency-based Recruitment and Selection Interviewing (CBI) Skills
 
Performance management – Best Practice Process and Principles
Performance management – Best Practice Process and Principles Performance management – Best Practice Process and Principles
Performance management – Best Practice Process and Principles
 
ورشة إدارة الموارد البشرية
ورشة إدارة الموارد البشرية ورشة إدارة الموارد البشرية
ورشة إدارة الموارد البشرية
 
Excel for hr
Excel for hrExcel for hr
Excel for hr
 
الدبلوم العملي في الموارد البشرية
الدبلوم العملي في الموارد البشريةالدبلوم العملي في الموارد البشرية
الدبلوم العملي في الموارد البشرية
 
Labor law, insurance and tax Workshop
Labor law, insurance and tax Workshop Labor law, insurance and tax Workshop
Labor law, insurance and tax Workshop
 
HRM | Course | Chapter 1 Wonder Box
HRM | Course | Chapter 1 Wonder BoxHRM | Course | Chapter 1 Wonder Box
HRM | Course | Chapter 1 Wonder Box
 
Ethics of South African Trainers
Ethics of South African TrainersEthics of South African Trainers
Ethics of South African Trainers
 
الفرق بين العولمة والعالمية.Ppt عبد الرحمن تيشوري
الفرق بين العولمة والعالمية.Ppt   عبد الرحمن تيشوريالفرق بين العولمة والعالمية.Ppt   عبد الرحمن تيشوري
الفرق بين العولمة والعالمية.Ppt عبد الرحمن تيشوري
 
Strategic hr using balance score cards
Strategic hr using balance score cardsStrategic hr using balance score cards
Strategic hr using balance score cards
 
Project Leadership and Change Management
Project Leadership and Change Management Project Leadership and Change Management
Project Leadership and Change Management
 
Leadership Principles & Practice
Leadership Principles & PracticeLeadership Principles & Practice
Leadership Principles & Practice
 

Similar to Job Analysis_Evaluation_Grading_Process and Tools

Job analysis – process and tools nkayelo
Job analysis – process and tools nkayeloJob analysis – process and tools nkayelo
Job analysis – process and tools nkayeloCharles Cotter, PhD
 
Job analysis & contengency
Job analysis & contengencyJob analysis & contengency
Job analysis & contengencyMuhammad Ali
 
Job analysis and job designs
Job analysis and job designsJob analysis and job designs
Job analysis and job designsSara Aljanabi
 
Job Analysis Quirin.ppt
Job Analysis Quirin.pptJob Analysis Quirin.ppt
Job Analysis Quirin.pptAamir Rashid
 
Training needs analysis, skills auditing and training roi presentation 31 aug...
Training needs analysis, skills auditing and training roi presentation 31 aug...Training needs analysis, skills auditing and training roi presentation 31 aug...
Training needs analysis, skills auditing and training roi presentation 31 aug...Charles Cotter, PhD
 
Miller osinski
Miller osinskiMiller osinski
Miller osinskiiyyam_vj
 
Training needs analysis, skills auditing and training
Training needs analysis, skills auditing and trainingTraining needs analysis, skills auditing and training
Training needs analysis, skills auditing and trainingCharles Cotter, PhD
 
Job analysis and description
Job analysis and descriptionJob analysis and description
Job analysis and descriptionOlaAlomoush
 
Job Analysis and the Talent Management Process.pptx
Job Analysis and the Talent Management Process.pptxJob Analysis and the Talent Management Process.pptx
Job Analysis and the Talent Management Process.pptxSamahAyad4
 
Overview of the SAT Process
Overview of the  SAT ProcessOverview of the  SAT Process
Overview of the SAT Processjohannabishop
 
Job Analysis, Job Design and Job Acquisition
Job Analysis, Job Design and Job AcquisitionJob Analysis, Job Design and Job Acquisition
Job Analysis, Job Design and Job AcquisitionJo Balucanag - Bitonio
 

Similar to Job Analysis_Evaluation_Grading_Process and Tools (20)

Job analysis – process and tools nkayelo
Job analysis – process and tools nkayeloJob analysis – process and tools nkayelo
Job analysis – process and tools nkayelo
 
Job analyisis
Job analyisisJob analyisis
Job analyisis
 
Job analyisis
Job analyisisJob analyisis
Job analyisis
 
Job analysis & contengency
Job analysis & contengencyJob analysis & contengency
Job analysis & contengency
 
3 job analyisis
3  job analyisis3  job analyisis
3 job analyisis
 
job analysis
job analysisjob analysis
job analysis
 
Job analysis and job designs
Job analysis and job designsJob analysis and job designs
Job analysis and job designs
 
Chapter 4 hr
Chapter 4 hrChapter 4 hr
Chapter 4 hr
 
Job Analysis Quirin.ppt
Job Analysis Quirin.pptJob Analysis Quirin.ppt
Job Analysis Quirin.ppt
 
Training needs analysis, skills auditing and training roi presentation 31 aug...
Training needs analysis, skills auditing and training roi presentation 31 aug...Training needs analysis, skills auditing and training roi presentation 31 aug...
Training needs analysis, skills auditing and training roi presentation 31 aug...
 
Miller osinski
Miller osinskiMiller osinski
Miller osinski
 
Training needs analysis, skills auditing and training
Training needs analysis, skills auditing and trainingTraining needs analysis, skills auditing and training
Training needs analysis, skills auditing and training
 
Job analysis and description
Job analysis and descriptionJob analysis and description
Job analysis and description
 
Job Analysis and the Talent Management Process.pptx
Job Analysis and the Talent Management Process.pptxJob Analysis and the Talent Management Process.pptx
Job Analysis and the Talent Management Process.pptx
 
Overview of the SAT Process
Overview of the  SAT ProcessOverview of the  SAT Process
Overview of the SAT Process
 
Hr forms final
Hr forms finalHr forms final
Hr forms final
 
Job Analysis, Job Design and Job Acquisition
Job Analysis, Job Design and Job AcquisitionJob Analysis, Job Design and Job Acquisition
Job Analysis, Job Design and Job Acquisition
 
Job analysis l5
Job analysis l5Job analysis l5
Job analysis l5
 
Job analysis l4
Job analysis l4Job analysis l4
Job analysis l4
 
Job design report white
Job design report whiteJob design report white
Job design report white
 

More from Charles Cotter, PhD

Talent Management research intelligence_13 paradigm shifts_20 March 2024.pdf
Talent Management research intelligence_13 paradigm shifts_20 March 2024.pdfTalent Management research intelligence_13 paradigm shifts_20 March 2024.pdf
Talent Management research intelligence_13 paradigm shifts_20 March 2024.pdfCharles Cotter, PhD
 
Strategic Talent Management and Development.pdf
Strategic Talent Management and Development.pdfStrategic Talent Management and Development.pdf
Strategic Talent Management and Development.pdfCharles Cotter, PhD
 
4 Critical Success Factors to Build Sustainable Remuneration Strategies_Balan...
4 Critical Success Factors to Build Sustainable Remuneration Strategies_Balan...4 Critical Success Factors to Build Sustainable Remuneration Strategies_Balan...
4 Critical Success Factors to Build Sustainable Remuneration Strategies_Balan...Charles Cotter, PhD
 
Performance Management_Strategic Lever of Organizational Sustainability_15 No...
Performance Management_Strategic Lever of Organizational Sustainability_15 No...Performance Management_Strategic Lever of Organizational Sustainability_15 No...
Performance Management_Strategic Lever of Organizational Sustainability_15 No...Charles Cotter, PhD
 
PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT – BEST PRACTICE PRINCIPLES_PROCESS_TOOLS_Facilitated b...
PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT – BEST PRACTICE PRINCIPLES_PROCESS_TOOLS_Facilitated b...PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT – BEST PRACTICE PRINCIPLES_PROCESS_TOOLS_Facilitated b...
PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT – BEST PRACTICE PRINCIPLES_PROCESS_TOOLS_Facilitated b...Charles Cotter, PhD
 
STRATEGIC LEARNING AND DEVELOPMENT_L&D METRICS AND ANALYTICS_Facilitated by D...
STRATEGIC LEARNING AND DEVELOPMENT_L&D METRICS AND ANALYTICS_Facilitated by D...STRATEGIC LEARNING AND DEVELOPMENT_L&D METRICS AND ANALYTICS_Facilitated by D...
STRATEGIC LEARNING AND DEVELOPMENT_L&D METRICS AND ANALYTICS_Facilitated by D...Charles Cotter, PhD
 
STRATEGIC TALENT MANAGEMENT_Facilitated by Dr Charles Cotter_Training Brochur...
STRATEGIC TALENT MANAGEMENT_Facilitated by Dr Charles Cotter_Training Brochur...STRATEGIC TALENT MANAGEMENT_Facilitated by Dr Charles Cotter_Training Brochur...
STRATEGIC TALENT MANAGEMENT_Facilitated by Dr Charles Cotter_Training Brochur...Charles Cotter, PhD
 
Management and Leadership Skills_Facilitated by Dr Charles Cotter_Training Br...
Management and Leadership Skills_Facilitated by Dr Charles Cotter_Training Br...Management and Leadership Skills_Facilitated by Dr Charles Cotter_Training Br...
Management and Leadership Skills_Facilitated by Dr Charles Cotter_Training Br...Charles Cotter, PhD
 
HRM Metrics and Scorecards_Training Brochure_Presented by Dr Charles Cotter.pdf
HRM Metrics and Scorecards_Training Brochure_Presented by Dr Charles Cotter.pdfHRM Metrics and Scorecards_Training Brochure_Presented by Dr Charles Cotter.pdf
HRM Metrics and Scorecards_Training Brochure_Presented by Dr Charles Cotter.pdfCharles Cotter, PhD
 
Strategic HRM and HRBP Training Brochure_Facilitated by Dr Charles Cotter
Strategic HRM and HRBP Training Brochure_Facilitated by Dr Charles CotterStrategic HRM and HRBP Training Brochure_Facilitated by Dr Charles Cotter
Strategic HRM and HRBP Training Brochure_Facilitated by Dr Charles CotterCharles Cotter, PhD
 
TESTIMONIALS_Dr Charles Cotter.pdf
TESTIMONIALS_Dr Charles Cotter.pdfTESTIMONIALS_Dr Charles Cotter.pdf
TESTIMONIALS_Dr Charles Cotter.pdfCharles Cotter, PhD
 
Evidence based Talent Analytics and Data driven Talent Management Strategies.pdf
Evidence based Talent Analytics and Data driven Talent Management Strategies.pdfEvidence based Talent Analytics and Data driven Talent Management Strategies.pdf
Evidence based Talent Analytics and Data driven Talent Management Strategies.pdfCharles Cotter, PhD
 
Learning Prospectus_Dr Charles Cotter_2023.pdf
Learning Prospectus_Dr Charles Cotter_2023.pdfLearning Prospectus_Dr Charles Cotter_2023.pdf
Learning Prospectus_Dr Charles Cotter_2023.pdfCharles Cotter, PhD
 
Biography_Charles Cotter_April 2023.pdf
Biography_Charles Cotter_April 2023.pdfBiography_Charles Cotter_April 2023.pdf
Biography_Charles Cotter_April 2023.pdfCharles Cotter, PhD
 
Effective Communication_Interpersonal_Conflict Resolution Skills.pdf
Effective Communication_Interpersonal_Conflict Resolution Skills.pdfEffective Communication_Interpersonal_Conflict Resolution Skills.pdf
Effective Communication_Interpersonal_Conflict Resolution Skills.pdfCharles Cotter, PhD
 
Strategic Talent Management_Best Practice Principles and Processes.pdf
Strategic Talent Management_Best Practice Principles and Processes.pdfStrategic Talent Management_Best Practice Principles and Processes.pdf
Strategic Talent Management_Best Practice Principles and Processes.pdfCharles Cotter, PhD
 
Human Resources Management (HRM) Value Chain Processes, Organizational Cultur...
Human Resources Management (HRM) Value Chain Processes, Organizational Cultur...Human Resources Management (HRM) Value Chain Processes, Organizational Cultur...
Human Resources Management (HRM) Value Chain Processes, Organizational Cultur...Charles Cotter, PhD
 
Talent Management Masterclass: Best practice principles and processes
Talent Management Masterclass: Best practice principles and processesTalent Management Masterclass: Best practice principles and processes
Talent Management Masterclass: Best practice principles and processesCharles Cotter, PhD
 
Positive Communication for Management_Principles and Techniques
Positive Communication for Management_Principles and Techniques Positive Communication for Management_Principles and Techniques
Positive Communication for Management_Principles and Techniques Charles Cotter, PhD
 
Team Development_Best practice principles and processes_25 26 November 2021
Team Development_Best practice principles and processes_25 26 November 2021Team Development_Best practice principles and processes_25 26 November 2021
Team Development_Best practice principles and processes_25 26 November 2021Charles Cotter, PhD
 

More from Charles Cotter, PhD (20)

Talent Management research intelligence_13 paradigm shifts_20 March 2024.pdf
Talent Management research intelligence_13 paradigm shifts_20 March 2024.pdfTalent Management research intelligence_13 paradigm shifts_20 March 2024.pdf
Talent Management research intelligence_13 paradigm shifts_20 March 2024.pdf
 
Strategic Talent Management and Development.pdf
Strategic Talent Management and Development.pdfStrategic Talent Management and Development.pdf
Strategic Talent Management and Development.pdf
 
4 Critical Success Factors to Build Sustainable Remuneration Strategies_Balan...
4 Critical Success Factors to Build Sustainable Remuneration Strategies_Balan...4 Critical Success Factors to Build Sustainable Remuneration Strategies_Balan...
4 Critical Success Factors to Build Sustainable Remuneration Strategies_Balan...
 
Performance Management_Strategic Lever of Organizational Sustainability_15 No...
Performance Management_Strategic Lever of Organizational Sustainability_15 No...Performance Management_Strategic Lever of Organizational Sustainability_15 No...
Performance Management_Strategic Lever of Organizational Sustainability_15 No...
 
PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT – BEST PRACTICE PRINCIPLES_PROCESS_TOOLS_Facilitated b...
PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT – BEST PRACTICE PRINCIPLES_PROCESS_TOOLS_Facilitated b...PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT – BEST PRACTICE PRINCIPLES_PROCESS_TOOLS_Facilitated b...
PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT – BEST PRACTICE PRINCIPLES_PROCESS_TOOLS_Facilitated b...
 
STRATEGIC LEARNING AND DEVELOPMENT_L&D METRICS AND ANALYTICS_Facilitated by D...
STRATEGIC LEARNING AND DEVELOPMENT_L&D METRICS AND ANALYTICS_Facilitated by D...STRATEGIC LEARNING AND DEVELOPMENT_L&D METRICS AND ANALYTICS_Facilitated by D...
STRATEGIC LEARNING AND DEVELOPMENT_L&D METRICS AND ANALYTICS_Facilitated by D...
 
STRATEGIC TALENT MANAGEMENT_Facilitated by Dr Charles Cotter_Training Brochur...
STRATEGIC TALENT MANAGEMENT_Facilitated by Dr Charles Cotter_Training Brochur...STRATEGIC TALENT MANAGEMENT_Facilitated by Dr Charles Cotter_Training Brochur...
STRATEGIC TALENT MANAGEMENT_Facilitated by Dr Charles Cotter_Training Brochur...
 
Management and Leadership Skills_Facilitated by Dr Charles Cotter_Training Br...
Management and Leadership Skills_Facilitated by Dr Charles Cotter_Training Br...Management and Leadership Skills_Facilitated by Dr Charles Cotter_Training Br...
Management and Leadership Skills_Facilitated by Dr Charles Cotter_Training Br...
 
HRM Metrics and Scorecards_Training Brochure_Presented by Dr Charles Cotter.pdf
HRM Metrics and Scorecards_Training Brochure_Presented by Dr Charles Cotter.pdfHRM Metrics and Scorecards_Training Brochure_Presented by Dr Charles Cotter.pdf
HRM Metrics and Scorecards_Training Brochure_Presented by Dr Charles Cotter.pdf
 
Strategic HRM and HRBP Training Brochure_Facilitated by Dr Charles Cotter
Strategic HRM and HRBP Training Brochure_Facilitated by Dr Charles CotterStrategic HRM and HRBP Training Brochure_Facilitated by Dr Charles Cotter
Strategic HRM and HRBP Training Brochure_Facilitated by Dr Charles Cotter
 
TESTIMONIALS_Dr Charles Cotter.pdf
TESTIMONIALS_Dr Charles Cotter.pdfTESTIMONIALS_Dr Charles Cotter.pdf
TESTIMONIALS_Dr Charles Cotter.pdf
 
Evidence based Talent Analytics and Data driven Talent Management Strategies.pdf
Evidence based Talent Analytics and Data driven Talent Management Strategies.pdfEvidence based Talent Analytics and Data driven Talent Management Strategies.pdf
Evidence based Talent Analytics and Data driven Talent Management Strategies.pdf
 
Learning Prospectus_Dr Charles Cotter_2023.pdf
Learning Prospectus_Dr Charles Cotter_2023.pdfLearning Prospectus_Dr Charles Cotter_2023.pdf
Learning Prospectus_Dr Charles Cotter_2023.pdf
 
Biography_Charles Cotter_April 2023.pdf
Biography_Charles Cotter_April 2023.pdfBiography_Charles Cotter_April 2023.pdf
Biography_Charles Cotter_April 2023.pdf
 
Effective Communication_Interpersonal_Conflict Resolution Skills.pdf
Effective Communication_Interpersonal_Conflict Resolution Skills.pdfEffective Communication_Interpersonal_Conflict Resolution Skills.pdf
Effective Communication_Interpersonal_Conflict Resolution Skills.pdf
 
Strategic Talent Management_Best Practice Principles and Processes.pdf
Strategic Talent Management_Best Practice Principles and Processes.pdfStrategic Talent Management_Best Practice Principles and Processes.pdf
Strategic Talent Management_Best Practice Principles and Processes.pdf
 
Human Resources Management (HRM) Value Chain Processes, Organizational Cultur...
Human Resources Management (HRM) Value Chain Processes, Organizational Cultur...Human Resources Management (HRM) Value Chain Processes, Organizational Cultur...
Human Resources Management (HRM) Value Chain Processes, Organizational Cultur...
 
Talent Management Masterclass: Best practice principles and processes
Talent Management Masterclass: Best practice principles and processesTalent Management Masterclass: Best practice principles and processes
Talent Management Masterclass: Best practice principles and processes
 
Positive Communication for Management_Principles and Techniques
Positive Communication for Management_Principles and Techniques Positive Communication for Management_Principles and Techniques
Positive Communication for Management_Principles and Techniques
 
Team Development_Best practice principles and processes_25 26 November 2021
Team Development_Best practice principles and processes_25 26 November 2021Team Development_Best practice principles and processes_25 26 November 2021
Team Development_Best practice principles and processes_25 26 November 2021
 

Recently uploaded

Intellectual Property Licensing Examples
Intellectual Property Licensing ExamplesIntellectual Property Licensing Examples
Intellectual Property Licensing Examplesamberjiles31
 
Team B Mind Map for Organizational Chg..
Team B Mind Map for Organizational Chg..Team B Mind Map for Organizational Chg..
Team B Mind Map for Organizational Chg..dlewis191
 
NewBase 25 March 2024 Energy News issue - 1710 by Khaled Al Awadi_compress...
NewBase  25 March  2024  Energy News issue - 1710 by Khaled Al Awadi_compress...NewBase  25 March  2024  Energy News issue - 1710 by Khaled Al Awadi_compress...
NewBase 25 March 2024 Energy News issue - 1710 by Khaled Al Awadi_compress...Khaled Al Awadi
 
Q2 2024 APCO Geopolitical Radar - The Global Operating Environment for Business
Q2 2024 APCO Geopolitical Radar - The Global Operating Environment for BusinessQ2 2024 APCO Geopolitical Radar - The Global Operating Environment for Business
Q2 2024 APCO Geopolitical Radar - The Global Operating Environment for BusinessAPCO
 
HELENE HECKROTTE'S PROFESSIONAL PORTFOLIO.pptx
HELENE HECKROTTE'S PROFESSIONAL PORTFOLIO.pptxHELENE HECKROTTE'S PROFESSIONAL PORTFOLIO.pptx
HELENE HECKROTTE'S PROFESSIONAL PORTFOLIO.pptxHelene Heckrotte
 
Fabric RFID Wristbands in Ireland for Events and Festivals
Fabric RFID Wristbands in Ireland for Events and FestivalsFabric RFID Wristbands in Ireland for Events and Festivals
Fabric RFID Wristbands in Ireland for Events and FestivalsWristbands Ireland
 
7movierulz.uk
7movierulz.uk7movierulz.uk
7movierulz.ukaroemirsr
 
Slicing Work on Business Agility Meetup Berlin
Slicing Work on Business Agility Meetup BerlinSlicing Work on Business Agility Meetup Berlin
Slicing Work on Business Agility Meetup BerlinAnton Skornyakov
 
Boat Trailers Market PPT: Growth, Outlook, Demand, Keyplayer Analysis and Opp...
Boat Trailers Market PPT: Growth, Outlook, Demand, Keyplayer Analysis and Opp...Boat Trailers Market PPT: Growth, Outlook, Demand, Keyplayer Analysis and Opp...
Boat Trailers Market PPT: Growth, Outlook, Demand, Keyplayer Analysis and Opp...IMARC Group
 
IIBA® Melbourne - Navigating Business Analysis - Excellence for Career Growth...
IIBA® Melbourne - Navigating Business Analysis - Excellence for Career Growth...IIBA® Melbourne - Navigating Business Analysis - Excellence for Career Growth...
IIBA® Melbourne - Navigating Business Analysis - Excellence for Career Growth...AustraliaChapterIIBA
 
To Create Your Own Wig Online To Create Your Own Wig Online
To Create Your Own Wig Online  To Create Your Own Wig OnlineTo Create Your Own Wig Online  To Create Your Own Wig Online
To Create Your Own Wig Online To Create Your Own Wig Onlinelng ths
 
Harvard Business Review.pptx | Navigating Labor Unrest (March-April 2024)
Harvard Business Review.pptx | Navigating Labor Unrest (March-April 2024)Harvard Business Review.pptx | Navigating Labor Unrest (March-April 2024)
Harvard Business Review.pptx | Navigating Labor Unrest (March-April 2024)tazeenaila12
 
PDT 89 - $1.4M - Seed - Plantee Innovations.pdf
PDT 89 - $1.4M - Seed - Plantee Innovations.pdfPDT 89 - $1.4M - Seed - Plantee Innovations.pdf
PDT 89 - $1.4M - Seed - Plantee Innovations.pdfHajeJanKamps
 
Plano de marketing- inglês em formato ppt
Plano de marketing- inglês  em formato pptPlano de marketing- inglês  em formato ppt
Plano de marketing- inglês em formato pptElizangelaSoaresdaCo
 
Graham and Doddsville - Issue 1 - Winter 2006 (1).pdf
Graham and Doddsville - Issue 1 - Winter 2006 (1).pdfGraham and Doddsville - Issue 1 - Winter 2006 (1).pdf
Graham and Doddsville - Issue 1 - Winter 2006 (1).pdfAnhNguyen97152
 
Cracking the ‘Business Process Outsourcing’ Code Main.pptx
Cracking the ‘Business Process Outsourcing’ Code Main.pptxCracking the ‘Business Process Outsourcing’ Code Main.pptx
Cracking the ‘Business Process Outsourcing’ Code Main.pptxWorkforce Group
 
NASA CoCEI Scaling Strategy - November 2023
NASA CoCEI Scaling Strategy - November 2023NASA CoCEI Scaling Strategy - November 2023
NASA CoCEI Scaling Strategy - November 2023Steve Rader
 
Borderless Access - Global B2B Panel book-unlock 2024
Borderless Access - Global B2B Panel book-unlock 2024Borderless Access - Global B2B Panel book-unlock 2024
Borderless Access - Global B2B Panel book-unlock 2024Borderless Access
 
Mihir Menda - Member of Supervisory Board at RMZ
Mihir Menda - Member of Supervisory Board at RMZMihir Menda - Member of Supervisory Board at RMZ
Mihir Menda - Member of Supervisory Board at RMZKanakChauhan5
 

Recently uploaded (20)

Intellectual Property Licensing Examples
Intellectual Property Licensing ExamplesIntellectual Property Licensing Examples
Intellectual Property Licensing Examples
 
Team B Mind Map for Organizational Chg..
Team B Mind Map for Organizational Chg..Team B Mind Map for Organizational Chg..
Team B Mind Map for Organizational Chg..
 
NewBase 25 March 2024 Energy News issue - 1710 by Khaled Al Awadi_compress...
NewBase  25 March  2024  Energy News issue - 1710 by Khaled Al Awadi_compress...NewBase  25 March  2024  Energy News issue - 1710 by Khaled Al Awadi_compress...
NewBase 25 March 2024 Energy News issue - 1710 by Khaled Al Awadi_compress...
 
Q2 2024 APCO Geopolitical Radar - The Global Operating Environment for Business
Q2 2024 APCO Geopolitical Radar - The Global Operating Environment for BusinessQ2 2024 APCO Geopolitical Radar - The Global Operating Environment for Business
Q2 2024 APCO Geopolitical Radar - The Global Operating Environment for Business
 
HELENE HECKROTTE'S PROFESSIONAL PORTFOLIO.pptx
HELENE HECKROTTE'S PROFESSIONAL PORTFOLIO.pptxHELENE HECKROTTE'S PROFESSIONAL PORTFOLIO.pptx
HELENE HECKROTTE'S PROFESSIONAL PORTFOLIO.pptx
 
Fabric RFID Wristbands in Ireland for Events and Festivals
Fabric RFID Wristbands in Ireland for Events and FestivalsFabric RFID Wristbands in Ireland for Events and Festivals
Fabric RFID Wristbands in Ireland for Events and Festivals
 
7movierulz.uk
7movierulz.uk7movierulz.uk
7movierulz.uk
 
Slicing Work on Business Agility Meetup Berlin
Slicing Work on Business Agility Meetup BerlinSlicing Work on Business Agility Meetup Berlin
Slicing Work on Business Agility Meetup Berlin
 
Boat Trailers Market PPT: Growth, Outlook, Demand, Keyplayer Analysis and Opp...
Boat Trailers Market PPT: Growth, Outlook, Demand, Keyplayer Analysis and Opp...Boat Trailers Market PPT: Growth, Outlook, Demand, Keyplayer Analysis and Opp...
Boat Trailers Market PPT: Growth, Outlook, Demand, Keyplayer Analysis and Opp...
 
IIBA® Melbourne - Navigating Business Analysis - Excellence for Career Growth...
IIBA® Melbourne - Navigating Business Analysis - Excellence for Career Growth...IIBA® Melbourne - Navigating Business Analysis - Excellence for Career Growth...
IIBA® Melbourne - Navigating Business Analysis - Excellence for Career Growth...
 
To Create Your Own Wig Online To Create Your Own Wig Online
To Create Your Own Wig Online  To Create Your Own Wig OnlineTo Create Your Own Wig Online  To Create Your Own Wig Online
To Create Your Own Wig Online To Create Your Own Wig Online
 
Harvard Business Review.pptx | Navigating Labor Unrest (March-April 2024)
Harvard Business Review.pptx | Navigating Labor Unrest (March-April 2024)Harvard Business Review.pptx | Navigating Labor Unrest (March-April 2024)
Harvard Business Review.pptx | Navigating Labor Unrest (March-April 2024)
 
PDT 89 - $1.4M - Seed - Plantee Innovations.pdf
PDT 89 - $1.4M - Seed - Plantee Innovations.pdfPDT 89 - $1.4M - Seed - Plantee Innovations.pdf
PDT 89 - $1.4M - Seed - Plantee Innovations.pdf
 
Plano de marketing- inglês em formato ppt
Plano de marketing- inglês  em formato pptPlano de marketing- inglês  em formato ppt
Plano de marketing- inglês em formato ppt
 
Graham and Doddsville - Issue 1 - Winter 2006 (1).pdf
Graham and Doddsville - Issue 1 - Winter 2006 (1).pdfGraham and Doddsville - Issue 1 - Winter 2006 (1).pdf
Graham and Doddsville - Issue 1 - Winter 2006 (1).pdf
 
Cracking the ‘Business Process Outsourcing’ Code Main.pptx
Cracking the ‘Business Process Outsourcing’ Code Main.pptxCracking the ‘Business Process Outsourcing’ Code Main.pptx
Cracking the ‘Business Process Outsourcing’ Code Main.pptx
 
NASA CoCEI Scaling Strategy - November 2023
NASA CoCEI Scaling Strategy - November 2023NASA CoCEI Scaling Strategy - November 2023
NASA CoCEI Scaling Strategy - November 2023
 
Borderless Access - Global B2B Panel book-unlock 2024
Borderless Access - Global B2B Panel book-unlock 2024Borderless Access - Global B2B Panel book-unlock 2024
Borderless Access - Global B2B Panel book-unlock 2024
 
Mihir Menda - Member of Supervisory Board at RMZ
Mihir Menda - Member of Supervisory Board at RMZMihir Menda - Member of Supervisory Board at RMZ
Mihir Menda - Member of Supervisory Board at RMZ
 
WAM Corporate Presentation Mar 25 2024.pdf
WAM Corporate Presentation Mar 25 2024.pdfWAM Corporate Presentation Mar 25 2024.pdf
WAM Corporate Presentation Mar 25 2024.pdf
 

Job Analysis_Evaluation_Grading_Process and Tools

  • 1. JOB ANALYSIS, EVALUATION AND – GRADING – PROCESSES AND TOOLS CHARLES COTTER www.slideshare.net/CharlesCotter BIRCHWOOD HOTEL AND CONFERENCE CENTRE 3-4 APRIL 2017
  • 2. TRAINING PROGRAMME OVERVIEW – DAY 1 • Defining the fundamental concepts • Building a business case for Job Analysis – the utility and functional value thereof • Unpacking the key components of Job Analysis process • Diagnosis of current Job Analysis practices:  Efficiency  Methods/techniques • Applying the 5-step, Job Analysis process:  Developing a Job Description  Developing a Job Specification • Case study: Job Analysis (Excitor)
  • 3. TRAINING PROGRAMME OVERVIEW – DAY 2 • Defining the fundamental concepts • Building a business case for Job Evaluation – the utility and functional value thereof • Review and application of Job Evaluation systems:  Hay Group  Peromnes  JE Manager  T.A.S.K.  Paterson  EQUATE  Towers Watson GGS • Case study: Job Evaluation (World Vision) • Integration of job analysis, -evaluation and compensation structure
  • 5. INTRODUCTORY ACTIVITY • Complete the following statement by inserting one word only. In order to be an effective Job Analyst, I need to/to be……………………………………………………… • Jot this word down and find other learners who have written down the same word. • Write this word down on the flip-chart. • You’ll be given the opportunity to substantiate your choice of word.
  • 8. COMPETENCE • “Applied Competence is the union of practical, foundational and reflexive competence” • Practical Competence - the demonstrated ability to perform a set of tasks in an authentic context. A range of actions or possibilities is considered and decisions are made about which actions to follow and to perform the chosen action. • Foundational Competence - the demonstrated understanding of what the learner is doing and why. This underpins the practical competence and therefore the actions taken. • Reflexive Competence - the learner demonstrates the ability to integrate or connect performance with understanding so as to show that s/he is able to adapt to changed circumstances appropriately and responsibly, and to explain the reason behind an action. • Thus competence is understood as including the individual’s learning, understanding and ability to transfer and apply learned skills and knowledge across a wide range of work contexts.
  • 9. THE PURPOSE AND INTENTION OF A JOB ANALYSIS • What is the need of the job to exist? • What physical and mental activities does the worker undertake? • When is the job to be performed? • Where is the job to be performed? • How does the job performed by an employee? • What qualities and qualifications are required to perform the job?
  • 10. PRINCIPLES OF JOB ANALYSIS • The purpose of job analysis is to identify and describe, in a systemic and comprehensive manner; • Job analysis is not a study of the workers, but of their activities and what is required to perform those activities; • Job titles should not lead the analyst into assumptions about job duties; and • In a job that involves the use of machinery, the analyst should distinguish between what the worker does and what “gets” done.
  • 11. UTILITY AND FUNCTIONAL VALUE OF JOB ANALYSIS – APPLIED TO HR VALUE CHAIN
  • 15. LEARNING ACTIVITY 1 • Group discussion • Build a business case for Job Analysis. Describe the utility and functional value, applied to the HR Value Chain. Do the benefits of Job Analysis outweigh the costs? Is Job Analysis viable, feasible and sustainable. • Provide feedback in the form of summary
  • 17. JOB DATA • The job’s context/environment • The job’s tasks and duties • Performance standards • Tools and Equipment • Relationships • Job Requirements (KSAE)
  • 20. QUALITATIVE METHODS OF JOB DATA COLLECTION
  • 21. LEARNING ACTIVITY 2 • Group discussion • Diagnosis of current Job Analysis practices/processes.  Review your current organizational Job Analysis practices and processes and indicate the efficiency and effectiveness. Identify gaps and recommend improvement strategies. • Diagnosis of current Job Analysis data collection methods/techniques.  Review your current organizational Job Analysis quantitative and qualitative methods and techniques and indicate their effectiveness, reliability and validity. Identify gaps and recommend improvement strategies. • Provide feedback in the form of summary
  • 23. PHASES OF JOB ANALYSIS (P-D-C-A)
  • 24. STEP 1: PLANNING THE JOB ANALYSIS • The key actions of step 1 are listed below: Identify the purpose of a Job Analysis Identify the objectives of a Job Analysis Obtain top management support
  • 25. STEP 2: PREPARING FOR AND INTRODUCING JOB ANALYSIS • The key actions of step 2 are listed below: Identify jobs Identify methods and techniques Review existing job documentation Developing Implementation (Action) Plan Communicate process to management and employees
  • 27. LEARNING ACTIVITY 3 • Group discussion • Apply steps 1 and 2 (PLAN) of the Job Analysis process to a defined organizational context: Step 1: Planning the Job Analysis Step 2: Preparing for and Introducing Job Analysis • Provide feedback in the form of summary
  • 28. STEP 3: CONDUCTING JOB ANALYSIS
  • 29. STEP 3: CONDUCTING JOB ANALYSIS • The key actions of step 3 are listed below: Gather job analysis data Analyze and interpret data Review, verify & compile data
  • 30. STEP 3: DEVELOPING A JOB ANALYSIS MATRIX - FOCAL POINTS
  • 31. STEP 3: CONDUCTING JOB ANALYSIS - PROCESS
  • 34. STEP 4: DEVELOPING JOB DESCRIPTIONS AND JOB SPECIFICATIONS • The key actions of step 4 are listed below: Draft Job Descriptions and Job Specifications Review drafts with managers and employees Finalize job descriptions and recommendations
  • 38. STEP 4: DEVELOPING JOB DESCRIPTIONS AND JOB SPECIFICATIONS • Writing Job Descriptions • The process of job writing • Who is involved in the process of job description writing? • Planning the job writing process • Preparing for the interview • Putting the interviewee at ease • Gathering all the administrative details and contextual information • Gathering all the appropriate information regarding the purpose, functions and tasks of the job • Summary of Do’s and Don’ts
  • 39. LEARNING ACTIVITY 4 • Group discussion • Identify a critical job in your organization. Apply steps 3-4 (DO) of the Job Analysis process to a defined organizational context. Job Description Job Specification • Provide feedback in the form of summary
  • 40. STEP 5: MAINTAINING AND UPDATING JOB DESCRIPTIONS AND JOB SPECIFICATIONS
  • 41. STEP 5: MAINTAINING AND UPDATING JOB DESCRIPTIONS AND JOB SPECIFICATIONS • The key activities of step 5 are: Update job descriptions and job specifications as the organization changes Periodically review all jobs
  • 42. LEARNING ACTIVITY 5 • Group discussion • By referring to the identified, critical job in your organization, apply step 5 (CHECK and ACT) of the Job Analysis process. • Provide feedback in the form of summary
  • 44. LEARNING INTEGRATION – CASE STUDY 1 • Syndicate group case analysis and feedback: • Apply the theoretical principles to the Excitor case study.
  • 45. CASE STUDY 1: DEVELOPING A COMPLETE PLAN FOR JOB ANALYSIS (EXCITOR) • 1. Identify the purpose and objectives of the job analysis. • 2. Identify some of the 2.1) elements and 2.2) practical considerations that influence the choice/selection of the job analysis method/s. • 3. Do you believe that the consultant’s proposed hybrid of job analysis methods is appropriate (best fit)? Justify your response. • 4. Identify a few sources of job analysis data utilized by the consultant. • 5. Identify the primary data collection methods utilized by the consultant. Do you believe that the consultant strike the right balance of quantitative (analytical) and qualitative (non-analytical) methods? Justify your response. • 6. Do you believe that the consultant’s sample size and composition (of employees and managers) and related rationale is sensible, given the requirements of viability, feasibility, practicality and the need to comply with the scientific principles of reliability and representivity? Justify your response.
  • 46. CASE STUDY 1: DEVELOPING A COMPLETE PLAN FOR JOB ANALYSIS (EXCITOR) • 7. Do you regard the consultant’s data collection, collation, analysis, interpretation, validation and reporting 7.1) efficient and 7.2) effective? Justify your response. • 8. Do you believe that the consultant excelled with the crafting and drafting of the 8.1) Job Description and 8.2) Job Specification documents? Justify your response. • 9. Do you believe that the consultant complied with and followed the client’s brief and ultimately, met their needs and expectations? Justify your response. • 10. Do you believe that the consultant applied the 5-step Job Analysis process effectively? Justify your response. Would you recommend any improvements to their methodology and/or process? • 11. As a job analyst and/or HR Manager what are the lessons that you can extract from this case study.
  • 47. CONCLUSION – DAY 1 • Key points • Summary • Questions
  • 49. DEFINITION, PURPOSE AND OBJECTIVES OF JOB EVALUATION • Job Evaluation is the process of determining as systematically and objectively as possible, the worth of one job relative to another without regard for personalities or existing structures. • It tries to make a systematic comparison between jobs to assess their relative worth for the purpose of establishing a rational pay structure. • The purpose is to achieve and maintain an equitable distribution of basic wages and/or salaries according to level of position. • The main objectives of such an exercise can be stated as “the establishment of internal equity with a graded hierarchy of jobs within the organization and of external equity with the external market rate for equivalent jobs”.
  • 52. CRITICAL SUCCESS FACTORS AND BEST PRACTICE PRINCIPLES OF JOB EVALUATION • Selection of a system of job evaluation • Selling the concept and the system to management and employees • Designing the job description forms in accordance with company requirements • Deciding on how job descriptions are to be written • Training those people who will write job descriptions and the Grading Committee • Monitoring the quality of job descriptions
  • 55. JOB EVALUATION PROCESS • Stage 1 is the inflexible part of the process. Although there is a degree of flexibility in any job evaluation method, one must observe the grading rules if the system is to retain its credibility. This stage consists of: Writing the job descriptions in an agreed format Grading of the job description by a trained representative committee using the job evaluation rules • Stage 2 is where flexibility must be built into the remuneration system. This stage consists of: Development of wage and salary structuring, benefits and incentives within the framework of the market rates, company policy and ability to pay.
  • 56. JOB EVALUATION PROCESS - ILLUSTRATED
  • 57. CRITERIA INFORMING THE SELECTION OF THE JOB EVALUATION SYSTEM – 3E’s • Management and staff must understand it; be committed to it and accept it - EMPOWERED • Implementation can be quick - EXPEDIENCY • Updating and maintaining the system will be quick and easy - EFFICIENCY
  • 59. PROMINENT JOB EVALUATION SYSTEMS • Hay Group • Peromnes • JE Manager/Decision Tree • T.A.S.K. • Paterson • EQUATE • Towers Watson GGS
  • 62. HAY JOB EVALUATION METHOD • Hay Group pioneered the “factor comparison” job evaluation method and modified it in its Guide Charts in the early 1950’s. • Organizations use the Hay methodology to evaluate jobs against a set of common factors that measure:  Inputs (required knowledge, skills, and capabilities),  Throughputs (processing of inputs to achieve results)  Outputs (end result expectations from applying inputs constructively) • During the evaluation process, each job’s content is analyzed relative to each factor and represented by a numerical value. These factor values are then totaled to determine the overall job “size.” • The input-throughput-output model is reflected in the Hay Method as Know-How, Problem Solving and Accountability. Each grouping can be further broken down into eight elements for the work value assessment.
  • 63. HAY JOB EVALUATION FACTORS • Accountability (has three dimensions):  Freedom to Act  Scope  Impact • Know-How (has three dimensions):  Technical/Specialized Skills  Managerial Skills  Human Relations Skills • Problem Solving (has two dimensions):  Thinking Environment  Thinking Challenge
  • 64. HAY JOB EVALUATION FACTORS - ILLUSTRATED
  • 65. HAY JOB EVALUATION GUIDE CHARTS • The Guide Charts enable consistent work evaluations. Each of the factors—Know- How, Problem Solving, and Accountability— has its own Guide Chart that reflects the identified sub elements. • Each Guide Chart scale is expandable to account for the complexity and size of the organization to which it is applied, and the scale descriptions can be modified when appropriate. • An important distinction is that the Hay Methodology can be calibrated to the value systems of other organizations within Hay’s compensation databases. This enables a wide range of benchmarking activities, potentially improving the accuracy of market pricing and increasing confidence in job evaluation results. • Guide Charts expedite the job evaluation process, but considerable expertise is required to understand the work’s nature to determine the degree to which elements exist for each factor. • The power is not only in the tool, but also in the evaluator’s knowledge and skill and the consistency in the tool’s application across the organization.
  • 66. PEROMNES • Peromnes grades show the rank order of jobs within an organization and allow jobs to be compared by grade with other jobs both inside and outside the organization. • Peromnes evaluates and scores jobs in terms of eight factors. These factors are intrinsic to jobs, do not measure aspects outside the job and are applicable to all jobs in terms of function and level in organization. • The first six evaluate tasks, skills, responsibilities and relationships (job content) and the last two evaluate education and further training and experience (job requirements).
  • 67. PEROMNES JOB EVALUATION FACTORS • Factor 1: Problem Solving • Factor 2: Consequence of Judgments • Factor 3: Pressure of Work • Factor 4: Knowledge • Factor 5: Job Impact • Factor 6: Comprehension • Factor 7: Educational Qualifications • Factor 8: Further Training/Experience:
  • 68. JE MANAGER/DT • JE Manager is a computerized system designed to eliminate human bias and has various checks and controls to ensure consistency of results. • It is transparent as it involves the job holder; the incumbent (where the post is occupied) to personally answers questions required by the system. • The system is also non-discriminatory in that the same set of factors, questions, and parameters are used to measure each job regardless of the incumbent. • The JE Manager process empowers employees in that they are directly involved in their own evaluations together with their line managers. • The system also takes into account the individual and the individual’s role in adding value to the organization more than other job evaluation system. • The system recognizes applied competencies acquired formally or informally without placing an undue emphasis on either.
  • 69. JE MANAGER/DT • It also avoids placing an undue emphasis on hierarchical positions or theoretical number of people supervised and the system specifically recognizes the specialist roles. • The system is designed for maximum flexibility allowing full customization to fit the culture, value system and organization structure. • JE Manager supports flexible pay structures and can be linked to competencies and performance management systems. • The system substantially reduces evaluation time. It reduces the time span between a request for an evaluation and the evaluation itself. • No job evaluation committee is required and the time spent on each evaluation is considerably less than traditional methods.
  • 70. JE MANAGER/DT FACTORS • Hay Group’s Decision Tree is a powerful, reliable and user-friendly web-based tool that simplifies the overall JE process. • The Decision Tree system helps organizations to build a database of job profiles, evaluate and validate jobs (online checks and balances), maintain, share, export and archive information and produce a wide-range of value-add reports. • The JE Manager measures six factors each on a bi-dimensional basis (X & Y):  Factor 1: Judgment  Factor 2: Planning and leadership  Factor 3: Communication  Factor 4: Job impact  Factor 5: Acquisition and application of knowledge  Factor 6: Skills acquisition and practice
  • 71. JE MANAGER/DT PROCESS • Evaluation is done by a trained evaluator on a question and answer basis prompted by the program. In attendance at the evaluation are the following role-players:  The incumbent ;  The incumbents line manager ;  The evaluator ; and  The incumbents representative (e.g. from a union), if so requested by the incumbent. • After the evaluation, the results are sent, without alteration, to be audited by an audit committee. The purpose of the audit is to validate the evaluation result and to ensure internal equity of jobs within the organization. • The audit committee is empowered to increase or decrease the evaluation scores, based on sound reason, in terms of the aforementioned objectives of validity and equity. • The audit committee is composed of the following four members:  A Chairman, from the Human Resources Department;  A Human Resources evaluation officer;  A representative from the department whose post is being audited; and  A representative from one other department (but not from the Human Resources Department).
  • 72. JE MANAGER/DT PROCESS • Should the incumbent consider that the post has been inappropriately graded, he/she may appeal against the evaluation. • An appeal committee will be constituted to consider the appeal. • The appeal committee may not be composed of members who audited the post originally. • The appeal committee, after hearing the appeal, may recommend the following:  No change to the grade(status quo) ;  Re-evaluate the job ; and  Revise the grade.
  • 73. T.A.S.K. JOB EVALUATION • Tuned Assessment of Skills and Knowledge (T.A.S.K.) • A Patterson plan derivative, the T.A.S.K. system that uses a point system with a number of factors for sub grading (skill level, knowledge, complexity, influence, pressure to address the problem of sub grading.
  • 74. T.A.S.K. JOB EVALUATION PROCESS • The T.A.S.K. job evaluation system evaluates jobs from grade 1 up to grade 26, where grade 1 will be the lowest job and grade 26 the highest job. • The T.A.S.K. system is based on the skill level requirements of jobs at all levels and in all functions in an organization. • All jobs, throughout an organization, can be classified into skill levels according to established standards. • To arrive at a job grade the following procedure must be follow:  Determine the skill level of the job;  Determine the points ranges for each of the four factors - Complexity, Knowledge, Influence and Pressure; and  Determine actual points per range by answering sub factor questions.
  • 75. T.A.S.K. JOB EVALUATION SKILL LEVELS • The T.A.S.K. job evaluation system categorizes jobs in 5 skill levels: Level 1: Basic Skills Level 2: Discretionary Skills Level 3: Specialized Skills Level 4: Tactical Skills Skill 5: Strategic skills
  • 76. T.A.S.K. JOB EVALUATION FACTORS • After the skill level of a post has been determined, the post is then rated against four factors: Complexity Knowledge Influence Pressure
  • 78. PATERSON GRADING SYSTEM • The basic premise of the method is that all jobs, regardless of level, industry or country, can be compared in terms of the number and weight of decisions that must be made by the job incumbent. • From this comparison a pay structure can be established. • Paterson maintains that an organization’s pay structure should reflect the organization and responsibility levels within the organization, and that responsibility should be measured and compared in terms of a single factor common to all jobs, namely, decision-making. • Paterson defines six kinds of Bands of decision, which are found in any company. Any job can be defined in terms of these Bands of decision and the authority relationships, which are involved.
  • 79. PATERSON GRADING SYSTEM BANDS OF DECISIONS • BAND F: Policy Making Decisions (Top Management) • BAND E: Programming Decisions (Senior Management) • BAND D: Interpretive Decisions (Middle Management and High Level Specialists) • BAND C: Routine/Process/System Decisions (Specialist or Skilled Employees) • BAND B: Automatic/Operative/Sub-system (Partially skilled employees) • BAND A: Defined Decisions (Basic Skilled Employees)
  • 80. PATERSON FACTORS • Factor 1: Decision-making/responsibility/judgment (Used for Banding) • Factor 2: Supervision/coordination of people/work (Used for sub- Banding) • Factor 3: Complexity of tasks (Used for sub-Banding) • Factor 4: Variety of tasks (Used for sub-Banding) • Factor 5: Degree of precision required (Used for sub-Banding) • Factor 6: Work pressure/physical effort (Used for sub-Banding)
  • 81. BANDS KIND OF DECISION LEVEL DESCRIPTOR 11 SUB-GRADES KIND OF GRADE F Policy Making Top Management 11 10 Co-ordinating or Supervisory Policy Policy E Programming Senior Management 9 8 Co-ordinating or Supervisory Programming Programming D Interpretive/ Probabilistic Middle Management (Expert) (Specialist) (Professional) 7 6 Supervisory Interpretive Interpretive C Routine/Process/ System Skilled (Specialist) (Professional) 5 4 Supervisory Skilled Skilled B Automatic/ Operative/ Sub-system Partially Skilled 3 2 Supervisory Partially skilled Partially skilled A Defined Basic Skilled 1 Defined
  • 82. 6 BROAD BANDS 11 SUB-GRADES 28 SUB-GRADES F 11 Policy Co-ordinating F5 F4 10 Policy F3 F2 F1 E 9 Programming Co-ordinating E5 E4 8 Programming E3 E2 E1 D 7. Interpretive Co-ordinating D5 D4 6 Interpretive D3 D2 D1 C 5. Skilled/Specialist Co-ordinating C5 C4 4 Skilled/Specialist C3 C2 C1 B 3. Partially skilled Co-ordinating B5 B4 2 Partially skilled B3 B2 B1 A 1. Basic skilled No Co-ordinating Sub-division A3 A2 A1
  • 83. EQUATE FACTORS • Responsibility • Thinking Demands • Communication and Contacts • Knowledge • Environmental Demands
  • 84. TOWERS WATSON GLOBAL GRADING SYSTEM (GGS) • Towers Watson’s systematic approach to job leveling helps organizations manage the opportunities and challenges of talent and reward program design including aligning jobs located in multiple regions or across different lines of business, or creating a career framework that integrates employees after a merger, acquisition or other structural change. • Job leveling is an analytical process that can determine the relative value of jobs in your organization, and it provides a foundation for reward and talent management programs • The Global Grade calculator allows you to grade jobs following the proprietary Towers Watson Global Grading methodology using three key steps:  Scope of the business  Band for the job  Grade for the job • The Global Grades generated by the calculator correlate with those included in the Towers Watson compensation surveys providing a valuable reference when assessing the competitiveness of reward packages.
  • 85. JOB EVALUATION SYSTEMS - COMPARISON
  • 86. APPLYING PATERSON JOB EVALUATION AND GRADING PROCEDURE • Writing the Job Description • Job Grading – Band the Job Descriptions (Step 1) • Grading of Supervisory Tasks (Step 2) • Sub-grading of Jobs (Step 3): variety and complexity of tasks precision pressure of work/physical effort
  • 87. LEARNING ACTIVITY 7 • Group discussion Evaluate the relative merits of each of the prominent Job Evaluation systems. Which one do you favour? Justify your decision. Apply the selected/preferred Job Evaluation system to an identified position. • Provide feedback in the form of summary
  • 89. LEARNING INTEGRATION – CASE STUDY • Syndicate group case analysis and feedback: • Apply the theoretical principles to the World Vision case study.
  • 90. CASE STUDY 2: JOB EVALUATION AT WORLD VISION (BY MEANS OF JE MANAGER) • 1. Identify the purpose and objectives of conducting the job evaluation at World Vision. • 2. By reviewing the old/previous system, perform a gap analysis i.e. identify the required areas of improvement at World Vision. • 3. Evaluate the effectiveness of the Hay Group JE Manager system in adequately addressing these gaps (identified in question 2). • 4. Identify at least three (3) job factors of the Hay Group JE Manager system which are used to evaluate and grade jobs at World Vision. • 5. List at least five (5) benefits that accrued to World Vision from applying the JE Manager job evaluation system. Which benefit would you regard as the most significant (highest value)? Justify your view. • 6. As a job evaluator and/or HR Manager what are the lessons that you can extract from this case study.
  • 91. LEARNING ACTIVITY 8 • Syndicate group discussion • Develop a strategic HRM framework in which your organization can harmonize the job analysis, -evaluation and compensation structure processes. • Present your framework in the form of summarized feedback.
  • 93. CONCLUSION – DAY 2 • Key points • Summary • Questions • Certification
  • 94. CONTACT DETAILS • Charles Cotter • (+27) 84 562 9446 • charlescot@polka.co.za • LinkedIn • Twitter: @Charles_Cotter • http://www.slideshare.net/CharlesCotter