Slideshare uses cookies to improve functionality and performance, and to provide you with relevant advertising. If you continue browsing the site, you agree to the use of cookies on this website. See our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.
Slideshare uses cookies to improve functionality and performance, and to provide you with relevant advertising. If you continue browsing the site, you agree to the use of cookies on this website. See our Privacy Policy and User Agreement for details.
Published on
Users seeking high availability, disaster recovery and zero downtime maintenance operation for business-critical MySQL applications face confusing choices. Is multi-master or master/slave clustering better? What about synchronous versus asynchronous replication? Using a plain vanilla, stock MySQL or a modified version of it? Which of these choices are right for data-driven businesses that depend on fast, reliable data access?
This no-BS webinar cuts through the FUD to explore the real trade-offs between the different clustering and replication methods, thens show you how Continuent's asynchronous master/slave clusters support these important capabilities for business-critical applications:
- High application write rates Master/slave clustering with Continuent
- Mixed workloads consisting of large and small transactions
- Data across multiple geographically distributed locations
- Failures and more importantly recovery from them
- Zero downtime maintenance and software upgrades
- Use of off-the-shelf MySQL/MariaDB to avoid application changes and allow clusters to improve as MySQL itself does.
We illustrate key points with demonstrations and case studies from deployed systems.
Login to see the comments