SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 23
Rain Water Harvesting and Geostatistical Modelling of
Ground Water in and around ISM Campus Dhanbad,
Jharkhand
M.Tech Mineral Exploration Dissertation
Presented by:
Dhirendra Pratap Singh
M.Tech (Mineral Exploration)
Department of Applied geology
Indian School of Mines, Dhanbad
Guide:
Prof. B.C.Sarkar
Professor Department of Applied Geology
Indian School of Mines, Dhanbad
Co-Guide:
Dr S.C.Dhiman
Former Chairman Central Ground Water Board
Presentation Highlights
• Artificial Recharge and Rain Water Harvesting in ISM
Campus.
• Geology of I.S.M. Campus.
• Hydrogeological Studies.
• Geophysical Studies.
• Geostatistical Modelling Studies.
• Ground water quality;
• Groundwater Resource Estimation and Management.
• Concluding Remarks.
Fig 2 Location map of ISM campus with recharge bore wells
2006 2009
2014
Artificial Recharge Technique in I.S.M.
• Roof Top Harvesting- In this Technique the top of the roof of the buildings in I.S.M. are
used as the catchment area of rain water for harvesting using artificial recharge
techniques.
Need for Augmentation and Management of Ground Water Resources
within I.S.M.
• Steep increase of human population in the campus.
• High water demand expected due to increase in developmental works and expansion
program.
• Conservation and management of available resource to meet the growing needs.
Supply Status of Water in I.S.M. Campus:
Sr.No
. Tube Well No. Location
Discharge/Hr.
(Litre) Pumping Hrs
Total
Discharge/ Day
Units
Cosumed/Day
1 Dug Well No. 1 Near Ruby hostel 15000 10 150000 55.95
2 Dug Well No. 2 Workshop Campus 12000 10 120000 55.95
3 Dug Well No. 3 Near Petroleum Building 12000 10 120000 111.90
4 Dug Well No. 4 Staff Colony 8000 10 80000 55.95
5 Dug Well No. 5 Near UGC Colony 20000 10 200000 111.90
6 Dug Well No. 6 Near CME Building 20000 10 200000 111.90
7 Dug Well No. 7 Near GJLT Hall 8000 3 24000 11.19
8 Deep Bore Well-9 Staff Colony 12000 9 108000 50.36
9 Deep Bore Well-10 Bamboo Garden 20000 12 240000 134.28
10 Deep Bore Well-11 Beside Seismology Observatory 20000 14 280000 78.33
11 Deep Bore Well-12 Jasper Hostel 8000 10 80000 37.30
12 Deep Bore Well-13 In Front Of Old EDC 8000 10 80000 37.30
13 Deep Bore Well-14 SBI ISM Campus Branch 8000 12 96000 44.76
14 Deep Bore Well-15 Beside 150 Qrts GR Side 8000 12 96000 44.76
15 Deep Bore Well-16 EDC Extension Building 8000 10 80000 37.30
Total 1954000 979.13
Total Consumption / Month 1954000x30 = 58620000 29373.90
Geology and General Succession of the Area:
Campus geology is a part of Chotanagpur Gneissic
Complex and is characterized by a diverse assemblage of
igneous and metamorphic rocks.
• Soils and recent sediments.
• Dolerite (Intrusions).
• Pegmatite, and leucogranite (intrusions).
• Megacrystic porphyritic granite (intrusions).
• Quartzo-feldspathic gneisses with mafic enclaves.
(Basement) equivalent to Chotanagpur Gneissic
complex.
I.S.M. contour line
showing the R.L.
Line showing the Ridge
y = -8.36x + 331.44
R² = 0.0839
0.00
100.00
200.00
300.00
400.00
500.00
600.00
2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
RAINFALL MONTHLY(mm) AND ITS TREND
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
R=0.289
Decreasing
Trend of
Rainfall
• Total Rainfall in 2001 was 1516.20mm
• Total Rainfall in 2014 was 984.80mm
• If we Predict with linear Model what will
be the situation ?????
453.40mm Its alarming 2028
Recharge Pit
Statistical Analysis
of
groundwater data
0.00
1.00
2.00
3.00
4.00
5.00
6.00
7.00
8.00
9.00
10.00
SaphireHostel
SaphireHostel
SaphireHostel
SaphireHostel
SaphireHostel
TopazHostel
TopazHostel
StudentActivityCentre
StudentActivityCentre
StudentActivityCentre
AmberHostel
AmberHostel
AmberHostel
AmberHostel
BackSideofEmerald…
BackSideofEmerald…
FrontSideofEmerald…
FrontSideofEmerald…
JasperHostel
JasperHostel
JasperHostel
HeritageBuilding
DiamondHostel
OpalHostel
OpalHostel
OpalHostel
OpalHostel
OldLibrary
Petroleum
ShantiBhawan
HawaMahal
HawaMahal
Workshop&MME
StaffColonyTypeII,
StaffColonyTypeII,
Lowerground
LecturehallcomplexII
LecturehallcomplexII
HealthCentre(old)
Teacherscolony
Teacherscolony
SBIBankISM
SBIBankISM
Fluctuationinm
Location
Fluctuation 2014
215.00
220.00
225.00
230.00
235.00
240.00
245.00
250.00
SaphireHostelpit1
SaphireHostelpit2
SaphireHostelpit3
SaphireHostelpit4
SaphireHostelpit5
SaphireHostelpit6
TopazHostelpit1
TopazHostelpit2
StudentActivityCentre…
StudentActivityCentre…
StudentActivityCentre…
AmberHostelpit1
AmberHostelpit2
AmberHostelpit3
AmberHostelpit4
BackSideofEmerald…
BackSideofEmerald…
FrontSideofEmerald…
FrontSideofEmerald…
JasperHostelpit1
JasperHostelpit2
JasperHostelpit3
HeritageBuilding
DiamondHostel
OpalHostelpit1
OpalHostelpit2
OpalHostelpit3
OpalHostelpit4
OldLibrary
Petroleum
ShantiBhawan
HawaMahalpit1
HawaMahalpit2
Workshop&MME
StaffColonyTypeIIpit1
StaffColonyTypeIIpit2
Lowerground
LecturehallcomplexII…
LecturehallcomplexII…
HealthCentre(old)
Teacherscolonypit1
Teacherscolonypit2
SBIBankISMpit1
SBIBankISMpit2
GroundwatertableLevel
Location
Groundwater Table in Pre and Post- monsoon 2014
Pre-monsoon 2014 Post-monsoon 2014
Experimental semivariogram with fitted
model for Pre-Monsoon period
γ(h)= 3.0+23[(1.5xh/875)-1.5(h/875)3]
Experimental semivariogram with
fitted model for Post-Monsoon period
γ(h)= 3.8+10[(1.5xh/600)-1.5(h/600)3]
0 500 1000 1500
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
Experimental semi-variogram
Model

Lag (h)
C0
C0+C
(h)
(h)= 3.0+23[(1.5xh/875)-1.5(h/875)3]
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200
0
10
20
Experimental semi-variogram
Model(h)
LAG (h)
C0+C
(h)= 3.8+10[(1.5xh/600)-1.5(h/600)3]C0
Experimental semivariogram with fitted model for
Fluctuation
γ(h)= 0.70+1.40[(1.5xh/800)-1.5(h/800)3]
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
Model
Experimental semo-variogram
C0+C
Lag (h)
(h)
(h)= 0.7+1.40[(1.5xh/800)-1.5(h/800)3]
C0
Pre-Monsoon GW level
Kriged SDKriged Estimate
Post-Monsoon GW level
Kriged SDKriged Estimate
Fluctuation GW level
Kriged SDKriged Estimate
Regression line of pre-monsoon
Y = 0.7625X+ 57.166
R² = 0.8787
228
230
232
234
236
238
240
242
244
246
248
220 225 230 235 240 245 250
KE
Measured
Kriged Estimate Premonsoon
Y = 0.6107X + 94.288
R² = 0.7603
234
236
238
240
242
244
246
248
230 235 240 245 250 255
KE
Measured
Kriged Estimate Postmonsoon
Regression line of post-monsoon
Y = 0.6049X + 0.7706
R² = 0.7757
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
0 2 4 6 8 10 12
KE
Measured
Kriged Estimate of Fluctuation
Regression line of fluctuation
For Pre-monsoon
‘t’calc on ‘r’ =
𝒓 𝒏−𝟐
𝟏−𝒓𝟐
= 18.40
‘t’table (α=0.05, ν=n-2, q=1-α) = 1.68
(i) If tcalc ≤ ttable : H0 is accepted and r is insignificant
(ii) If tcalc ≥ ttable : H1 is accepted and r is significant
For Post Monsoon
‘t’calc on ‘r’ =
𝒓 𝒏−𝟐
𝟏−𝒓𝟐
= 12.80
‘t’table (α=0.05, ν=n-2, q=1-α) = 1.67
(i) If tcalc ≤ ttable : H0 is accepted and r is insignificant
(ii) If tcalc ≥ ttable : H1 is accepted and r is significant
For Fluctuation ‘t’calc on ‘r’ =
𝒓 𝒏−𝟐
𝟏−𝒓𝟐
= 11.90
‘t’table (α=0.05, ν=n-2, q=1-α) = 1.68
(i) If tcalc ≤ ttable : H0 is accepted and r is insignificant
(ii) If tcalc ≥ ttable : H1 is accepted and r is significant
Monsoon recharge can be expressed as -
R = (h x Sy x A) + DG
Where,
h = rise in water level in the monsoon season,
A= area for computation of recharge,
Sy = specific yield,
DG = gross groundwater draft
The monsoon groundwater recharge has two components – rainfall recharge
and recharge from other sources. Mathematically it can be represented as –
R (Normal) = Rrf (normal) + Rc + Rsw + Rt + Rgw + Rwc
Rrf is the normal monsoon rainfall recharge.
The other sources of groundwater recharge during monsoon season include Rc, Rsw, Rt,
Rgw, Rwc which are recharge from rainfall, seepage from canals, surface water irrigation,
tanks and ponds, groundwater irrigation, water conservation structures respectively
Groundwater quality of ISM
Sr.no. Place/ Block Structure pH EC TDS TH CO3 HCO3 Ca Mg Na K Cl NO3 SO4 F PO4 SiO2
1 Ruby Hostel Annexe, ISM Recharge Well 8.04 728 473 195 ND 240 36 26 72 6 67 41 71 0.86 BDL 13
2
Shanti Bhawan, ISM Recharge Well
8.16 698 454 215 ND 252 30 34 44 3 39 16 72 0.92 BDL 12
3 Type II Qtrs, ISM Recharge Well 7.93 629 409 205 ND 215 32 30 41 4 89 7 39 0.57 BDL 15
4
Amber Hostel, ISM Recharge Well
7.83 720 468 220 ND 326 20 41 55 2 35 3 56 0.00 BDL 15
5
Sapphire Hostel, ISM Recharge Well
7.90 492 320 210 ND 148 32 19 22 8 14 29 71 1.06 BDL 2
6
Student activity centra,
ISM Recharge Well
8.02 660 429 210 ND 271 28 34 38 4 53 3 38 0.00 BDL 10
7 Central Workshop, ISM Dug Well 8.11 520 338 160 ND 209 28 22 34 4 35 5 33 0.97 BDL 12
8 Environment Marg, ISM Dug Well 8.10 202 131 80 ND 92 18 9 13 2 14 0 9 0.46 BDL 1
9 Staff Colony, ISM Dug Well 7.96 218 142 85 ND 105 18 10 14 2 18 0 8 0.00 BDL 0
10 CGWB, EW, ISM Bore Well 7.66 886 576 200 ND 308 38 45 59 6 18 18 85 0.00 BDL 10
11
Near Petroleum
Engineering, ISM Dug Well
7.91 904 588 235 ND 344 34 36 58 2 36 8 66 0.00 BDL 14
12 Thakurkuli, Dahiya Dug Well 7.88 1102 716 415 ND 277 44 74 54 2 89 39 107 0.62 BDL 17
13
Main Road, Saraidhela Handpump
7.93 1206 784 445 ND 185 176 1 59 3 163 43 111 0.83 BDL 16
14
Jagjeevan Nagar, Dhanbad Bore Well
7.87 819 532 285 ND 178 34 49 33 9 121 12 78 0.16 BDL 12
15 Bank More, Dhanbad Dug Well 7.95 289 188 90 ND 117 18 11 27 1 21 9 19 1.19 BDL 4
Min 7.66 202 131 80 ND 92 18.00 1.21 13.31 1 14.18 0.00 8.09 0.00 BDL 0
Max 8.10 1206 784 445 ND 344 176.00 74.11 59.19 9 163.07 43.29 110.55 1.19 BDL 17
Std Dev 0.12 407 264 145 ND 98 52.90 25.66 20.01 3 57.09 16.48 42.66 0.45 BDL 10
Avrage 7.91 703 457 229 ND 201 47.50 29.35 39.75 3 59.93 16.14 60.33 0.41 BDL 10.00
ND = Not Detected BDL = Below
Detection Limit
The study estimated that about 83% of total volume of groundwater available is consumed and thereby
maintaining a balance of about 17%.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
Concluding Remarks
The study revealed a mean rise of 2.29m in the groundwater during the year 2014.
This figure of groundwater resource balance is expected to improve over the years with continued monitoring study
of the fluctuating trend of the groundwater levels with rain water harvesting implemented and last but not the least,
an effective groundwater management.
Total replenishable volume of water recharge = (Area x fluctuation x 0.03) + Total draft during the period
Here, 0.03 is the specific yield considered for hard rock as per GEC, 1997
So, The volume of water recharged is 144270 m3 x 1000 = 144,270,000 liters
Consumption from ground water for the study period is 19,54,000 x 7 x 30 = 410,340,000.00 liters
Total Resource:- 410,340,000 + 144,270,000 = 554,610,000 liters
Groundwater Resource Estimation and Management
Rain water harvesting and geostatistical modelling of ground water in and around ism campus dhanbad dhirendra

More Related Content

Viewers also liked

내 인생의 영화
내 인생의 영화내 인생의 영화
내 인생의 영화
guest69b42c
 

Viewers also liked (12)

1. What is the structure of the gmat exam? GMAT FAQ
1. What is the structure of the gmat exam? GMAT FAQ1. What is the structure of the gmat exam? GMAT FAQ
1. What is the structure of the gmat exam? GMAT FAQ
 
The Leadership Disconnect infograph
The Leadership Disconnect infographThe Leadership Disconnect infograph
The Leadership Disconnect infograph
 
Dominant Transportation Privilege for Senior and Disabled people
Dominant Transportation Privilege for Senior and Disabled peopleDominant Transportation Privilege for Senior and Disabled people
Dominant Transportation Privilege for Senior and Disabled people
 
Salesforce and Origamo
Salesforce and OrigamoSalesforce and Origamo
Salesforce and Origamo
 
Epic Content Marketing Australia with Marketo and Joe Pulizzi
Epic Content Marketing Australia with Marketo and Joe PulizziEpic Content Marketing Australia with Marketo and Joe Pulizzi
Epic Content Marketing Australia with Marketo and Joe Pulizzi
 
내 인생의 영화
내 인생의 영화내 인생의 영화
내 인생의 영화
 
神之外子.田中將大
神之外子.田中將大神之外子.田中將大
神之外子.田中將大
 
Sars lec
Sars lecSars lec
Sars lec
 
Cinco formas de mejorar el servicio al cliente en su empresa
Cinco formas de mejorar el servicio al cliente en su empresa Cinco formas de mejorar el servicio al cliente en su empresa
Cinco formas de mejorar el servicio al cliente en su empresa
 
8 2-2 la quema de cañas
8 2-2 la quema de cañas 8 2-2 la quema de cañas
8 2-2 la quema de cañas
 
The Rosewood Hotel Harvard Business Case
The Rosewood Hotel Harvard Business CaseThe Rosewood Hotel Harvard Business Case
The Rosewood Hotel Harvard Business Case
 
Ooooold
OooooldOoooold
Ooooold
 

Similar to Rain water harvesting and geostatistical modelling of ground water in and around ism campus dhanbad dhirendra

Final Evaluation
Final EvaluationFinal Evaluation
Final Evaluation
Shahroz Ali
 
07 a80102 groundwaterdevelopmentandmanagement
07 a80102 groundwaterdevelopmentandmanagement07 a80102 groundwaterdevelopmentandmanagement
07 a80102 groundwaterdevelopmentandmanagement
imaduddin91
 
Purpose driven study assessment of effects of sedimentation on the capacity...
Purpose driven study   assessment of effects of sedimentation on the capacity...Purpose driven study   assessment of effects of sedimentation on the capacity...
Purpose driven study assessment of effects of sedimentation on the capacity...
hydrologywebsite1
 
performance evaluation of desilting devices
performance evaluation of desilting devicesperformance evaluation of desilting devices
performance evaluation of desilting devices
Gurdeep singh Johar
 

Similar to Rain water harvesting and geostatistical modelling of ground water in and around ism campus dhanbad dhirendra (20)

Feasibility and Economic Design of Pumped Storage Hydropower Station
Feasibility and Economic Design of Pumped Storage Hydropower StationFeasibility and Economic Design of Pumped Storage Hydropower Station
Feasibility and Economic Design of Pumped Storage Hydropower Station
 
Centennial Talk Hydrates
Centennial Talk HydratesCentennial Talk Hydrates
Centennial Talk Hydrates
 
Final Evaluation
Final EvaluationFinal Evaluation
Final Evaluation
 
Characterization and evaluation of riparian buffers on sediment load
Characterization and evaluation of riparian buffers on sediment loadCharacterization and evaluation of riparian buffers on sediment load
Characterization and evaluation of riparian buffers on sediment load
 
M.i tank
M.i  tankM.i  tank
M.i tank
 
Design water supply scheme
Design water supply schemeDesign water supply scheme
Design water supply scheme
 
radial flow pumping test
radial flow pumping testradial flow pumping test
radial flow pumping test
 
Hydro POWER PLANT
Hydro POWER PLANTHydro POWER PLANT
Hydro POWER PLANT
 
07 a80102 groundwaterdevelopmentandmanagement
07 a80102 groundwaterdevelopmentandmanagement07 a80102 groundwaterdevelopmentandmanagement
07 a80102 groundwaterdevelopmentandmanagement
 
water tank
water tankwater tank
water tank
 
CONTINIOUS BRIDGE.pptx
CONTINIOUS BRIDGE.pptxCONTINIOUS BRIDGE.pptx
CONTINIOUS BRIDGE.pptx
 
Fianl PPT Nanotechnology.ppt
Fianl PPT Nanotechnology.pptFianl PPT Nanotechnology.ppt
Fianl PPT Nanotechnology.ppt
 
Design and Development Solar Power Aeration System ppt.pdf
Design and Development Solar Power Aeration System  ppt.pdfDesign and Development Solar Power Aeration System  ppt.pdf
Design and Development Solar Power Aeration System ppt.pdf
 
Caetité
CaetitéCaetité
Caetité
 
Purpose driven study assessment of effects of sedimentation on the capacity...
Purpose driven study   assessment of effects of sedimentation on the capacity...Purpose driven study   assessment of effects of sedimentation on the capacity...
Purpose driven study assessment of effects of sedimentation on the capacity...
 
Design Calculations for Solar Water Heating System
Design Calculations for Solar Water Heating SystemDesign Calculations for Solar Water Heating System
Design Calculations for Solar Water Heating System
 
Ijetcas14 589
Ijetcas14 589Ijetcas14 589
Ijetcas14 589
 
Borehole Magnetic Resonance for Aquifer Characterization - Jordan Furnans
Borehole Magnetic Resonance for Aquifer Characterization - Jordan FurnansBorehole Magnetic Resonance for Aquifer Characterization - Jordan Furnans
Borehole Magnetic Resonance for Aquifer Characterization - Jordan Furnans
 
performance evaluation of desilting devices
performance evaluation of desilting devicesperformance evaluation of desilting devices
performance evaluation of desilting devices
 
International Journal of Computational Engineering Research(IJCER)
International Journal of Computational Engineering Research(IJCER) International Journal of Computational Engineering Research(IJCER)
International Journal of Computational Engineering Research(IJCER)
 

Rain water harvesting and geostatistical modelling of ground water in and around ism campus dhanbad dhirendra

  • 1. Rain Water Harvesting and Geostatistical Modelling of Ground Water in and around ISM Campus Dhanbad, Jharkhand M.Tech Mineral Exploration Dissertation Presented by: Dhirendra Pratap Singh M.Tech (Mineral Exploration) Department of Applied geology Indian School of Mines, Dhanbad Guide: Prof. B.C.Sarkar Professor Department of Applied Geology Indian School of Mines, Dhanbad Co-Guide: Dr S.C.Dhiman Former Chairman Central Ground Water Board
  • 2. Presentation Highlights • Artificial Recharge and Rain Water Harvesting in ISM Campus. • Geology of I.S.M. Campus. • Hydrogeological Studies. • Geophysical Studies. • Geostatistical Modelling Studies. • Ground water quality; • Groundwater Resource Estimation and Management. • Concluding Remarks.
  • 3. Fig 2 Location map of ISM campus with recharge bore wells
  • 5. Artificial Recharge Technique in I.S.M. • Roof Top Harvesting- In this Technique the top of the roof of the buildings in I.S.M. are used as the catchment area of rain water for harvesting using artificial recharge techniques. Need for Augmentation and Management of Ground Water Resources within I.S.M. • Steep increase of human population in the campus. • High water demand expected due to increase in developmental works and expansion program. • Conservation and management of available resource to meet the growing needs.
  • 6. Supply Status of Water in I.S.M. Campus: Sr.No . Tube Well No. Location Discharge/Hr. (Litre) Pumping Hrs Total Discharge/ Day Units Cosumed/Day 1 Dug Well No. 1 Near Ruby hostel 15000 10 150000 55.95 2 Dug Well No. 2 Workshop Campus 12000 10 120000 55.95 3 Dug Well No. 3 Near Petroleum Building 12000 10 120000 111.90 4 Dug Well No. 4 Staff Colony 8000 10 80000 55.95 5 Dug Well No. 5 Near UGC Colony 20000 10 200000 111.90 6 Dug Well No. 6 Near CME Building 20000 10 200000 111.90 7 Dug Well No. 7 Near GJLT Hall 8000 3 24000 11.19 8 Deep Bore Well-9 Staff Colony 12000 9 108000 50.36 9 Deep Bore Well-10 Bamboo Garden 20000 12 240000 134.28 10 Deep Bore Well-11 Beside Seismology Observatory 20000 14 280000 78.33 11 Deep Bore Well-12 Jasper Hostel 8000 10 80000 37.30 12 Deep Bore Well-13 In Front Of Old EDC 8000 10 80000 37.30 13 Deep Bore Well-14 SBI ISM Campus Branch 8000 12 96000 44.76 14 Deep Bore Well-15 Beside 150 Qrts GR Side 8000 12 96000 44.76 15 Deep Bore Well-16 EDC Extension Building 8000 10 80000 37.30 Total 1954000 979.13 Total Consumption / Month 1954000x30 = 58620000 29373.90
  • 7. Geology and General Succession of the Area: Campus geology is a part of Chotanagpur Gneissic Complex and is characterized by a diverse assemblage of igneous and metamorphic rocks. • Soils and recent sediments. • Dolerite (Intrusions). • Pegmatite, and leucogranite (intrusions). • Megacrystic porphyritic granite (intrusions). • Quartzo-feldspathic gneisses with mafic enclaves. (Basement) equivalent to Chotanagpur Gneissic complex.
  • 8. I.S.M. contour line showing the R.L. Line showing the Ridge
  • 9. y = -8.36x + 331.44 R² = 0.0839 0.00 100.00 200.00 300.00 400.00 500.00 600.00 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 RAINFALL MONTHLY(mm) AND ITS TREND Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec R=0.289 Decreasing Trend of Rainfall
  • 10. • Total Rainfall in 2001 was 1516.20mm • Total Rainfall in 2014 was 984.80mm • If we Predict with linear Model what will be the situation ????? 453.40mm Its alarming 2028
  • 13. 0.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00 6.00 7.00 8.00 9.00 10.00 SaphireHostel SaphireHostel SaphireHostel SaphireHostel SaphireHostel TopazHostel TopazHostel StudentActivityCentre StudentActivityCentre StudentActivityCentre AmberHostel AmberHostel AmberHostel AmberHostel BackSideofEmerald… BackSideofEmerald… FrontSideofEmerald… FrontSideofEmerald… JasperHostel JasperHostel JasperHostel HeritageBuilding DiamondHostel OpalHostel OpalHostel OpalHostel OpalHostel OldLibrary Petroleum ShantiBhawan HawaMahal HawaMahal Workshop&MME StaffColonyTypeII, StaffColonyTypeII, Lowerground LecturehallcomplexII LecturehallcomplexII HealthCentre(old) Teacherscolony Teacherscolony SBIBankISM SBIBankISM Fluctuationinm Location Fluctuation 2014 215.00 220.00 225.00 230.00 235.00 240.00 245.00 250.00 SaphireHostelpit1 SaphireHostelpit2 SaphireHostelpit3 SaphireHostelpit4 SaphireHostelpit5 SaphireHostelpit6 TopazHostelpit1 TopazHostelpit2 StudentActivityCentre… StudentActivityCentre… StudentActivityCentre… AmberHostelpit1 AmberHostelpit2 AmberHostelpit3 AmberHostelpit4 BackSideofEmerald… BackSideofEmerald… FrontSideofEmerald… FrontSideofEmerald… JasperHostelpit1 JasperHostelpit2 JasperHostelpit3 HeritageBuilding DiamondHostel OpalHostelpit1 OpalHostelpit2 OpalHostelpit3 OpalHostelpit4 OldLibrary Petroleum ShantiBhawan HawaMahalpit1 HawaMahalpit2 Workshop&MME StaffColonyTypeIIpit1 StaffColonyTypeIIpit2 Lowerground LecturehallcomplexII… LecturehallcomplexII… HealthCentre(old) Teacherscolonypit1 Teacherscolonypit2 SBIBankISMpit1 SBIBankISMpit2 GroundwatertableLevel Location Groundwater Table in Pre and Post- monsoon 2014 Pre-monsoon 2014 Post-monsoon 2014
  • 14. Experimental semivariogram with fitted model for Pre-Monsoon period γ(h)= 3.0+23[(1.5xh/875)-1.5(h/875)3] Experimental semivariogram with fitted model for Post-Monsoon period γ(h)= 3.8+10[(1.5xh/600)-1.5(h/600)3] 0 500 1000 1500 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 Experimental semi-variogram Model  Lag (h) C0 C0+C (h) (h)= 3.0+23[(1.5xh/875)-1.5(h/875)3] 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 0 10 20 Experimental semi-variogram Model(h) LAG (h) C0+C (h)= 3.8+10[(1.5xh/600)-1.5(h/600)3]C0
  • 15. Experimental semivariogram with fitted model for Fluctuation γ(h)= 0.70+1.40[(1.5xh/800)-1.5(h/800)3] 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 Model Experimental semo-variogram C0+C Lag (h) (h) (h)= 0.7+1.40[(1.5xh/800)-1.5(h/800)3] C0
  • 16. Pre-Monsoon GW level Kriged SDKriged Estimate
  • 17. Post-Monsoon GW level Kriged SDKriged Estimate
  • 18. Fluctuation GW level Kriged SDKriged Estimate
  • 19. Regression line of pre-monsoon Y = 0.7625X+ 57.166 R² = 0.8787 228 230 232 234 236 238 240 242 244 246 248 220 225 230 235 240 245 250 KE Measured Kriged Estimate Premonsoon Y = 0.6107X + 94.288 R² = 0.7603 234 236 238 240 242 244 246 248 230 235 240 245 250 255 KE Measured Kriged Estimate Postmonsoon Regression line of post-monsoon Y = 0.6049X + 0.7706 R² = 0.7757 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 KE Measured Kriged Estimate of Fluctuation Regression line of fluctuation For Pre-monsoon ‘t’calc on ‘r’ = 𝒓 𝒏−𝟐 𝟏−𝒓𝟐 = 18.40 ‘t’table (α=0.05, ν=n-2, q=1-α) = 1.68 (i) If tcalc ≤ ttable : H0 is accepted and r is insignificant (ii) If tcalc ≥ ttable : H1 is accepted and r is significant
  • 20. For Post Monsoon ‘t’calc on ‘r’ = 𝒓 𝒏−𝟐 𝟏−𝒓𝟐 = 12.80 ‘t’table (α=0.05, ν=n-2, q=1-α) = 1.67 (i) If tcalc ≤ ttable : H0 is accepted and r is insignificant (ii) If tcalc ≥ ttable : H1 is accepted and r is significant For Fluctuation ‘t’calc on ‘r’ = 𝒓 𝒏−𝟐 𝟏−𝒓𝟐 = 11.90 ‘t’table (α=0.05, ν=n-2, q=1-α) = 1.68 (i) If tcalc ≤ ttable : H0 is accepted and r is insignificant (ii) If tcalc ≥ ttable : H1 is accepted and r is significant Monsoon recharge can be expressed as - R = (h x Sy x A) + DG Where, h = rise in water level in the monsoon season, A= area for computation of recharge, Sy = specific yield, DG = gross groundwater draft The monsoon groundwater recharge has two components – rainfall recharge and recharge from other sources. Mathematically it can be represented as – R (Normal) = Rrf (normal) + Rc + Rsw + Rt + Rgw + Rwc Rrf is the normal monsoon rainfall recharge. The other sources of groundwater recharge during monsoon season include Rc, Rsw, Rt, Rgw, Rwc which are recharge from rainfall, seepage from canals, surface water irrigation, tanks and ponds, groundwater irrigation, water conservation structures respectively
  • 21. Groundwater quality of ISM Sr.no. Place/ Block Structure pH EC TDS TH CO3 HCO3 Ca Mg Na K Cl NO3 SO4 F PO4 SiO2 1 Ruby Hostel Annexe, ISM Recharge Well 8.04 728 473 195 ND 240 36 26 72 6 67 41 71 0.86 BDL 13 2 Shanti Bhawan, ISM Recharge Well 8.16 698 454 215 ND 252 30 34 44 3 39 16 72 0.92 BDL 12 3 Type II Qtrs, ISM Recharge Well 7.93 629 409 205 ND 215 32 30 41 4 89 7 39 0.57 BDL 15 4 Amber Hostel, ISM Recharge Well 7.83 720 468 220 ND 326 20 41 55 2 35 3 56 0.00 BDL 15 5 Sapphire Hostel, ISM Recharge Well 7.90 492 320 210 ND 148 32 19 22 8 14 29 71 1.06 BDL 2 6 Student activity centra, ISM Recharge Well 8.02 660 429 210 ND 271 28 34 38 4 53 3 38 0.00 BDL 10 7 Central Workshop, ISM Dug Well 8.11 520 338 160 ND 209 28 22 34 4 35 5 33 0.97 BDL 12 8 Environment Marg, ISM Dug Well 8.10 202 131 80 ND 92 18 9 13 2 14 0 9 0.46 BDL 1 9 Staff Colony, ISM Dug Well 7.96 218 142 85 ND 105 18 10 14 2 18 0 8 0.00 BDL 0 10 CGWB, EW, ISM Bore Well 7.66 886 576 200 ND 308 38 45 59 6 18 18 85 0.00 BDL 10 11 Near Petroleum Engineering, ISM Dug Well 7.91 904 588 235 ND 344 34 36 58 2 36 8 66 0.00 BDL 14 12 Thakurkuli, Dahiya Dug Well 7.88 1102 716 415 ND 277 44 74 54 2 89 39 107 0.62 BDL 17 13 Main Road, Saraidhela Handpump 7.93 1206 784 445 ND 185 176 1 59 3 163 43 111 0.83 BDL 16 14 Jagjeevan Nagar, Dhanbad Bore Well 7.87 819 532 285 ND 178 34 49 33 9 121 12 78 0.16 BDL 12 15 Bank More, Dhanbad Dug Well 7.95 289 188 90 ND 117 18 11 27 1 21 9 19 1.19 BDL 4 Min 7.66 202 131 80 ND 92 18.00 1.21 13.31 1 14.18 0.00 8.09 0.00 BDL 0 Max 8.10 1206 784 445 ND 344 176.00 74.11 59.19 9 163.07 43.29 110.55 1.19 BDL 17 Std Dev 0.12 407 264 145 ND 98 52.90 25.66 20.01 3 57.09 16.48 42.66 0.45 BDL 10 Avrage 7.91 703 457 229 ND 201 47.50 29.35 39.75 3 59.93 16.14 60.33 0.41 BDL 10.00 ND = Not Detected BDL = Below Detection Limit
  • 22. The study estimated that about 83% of total volume of groundwater available is consumed and thereby maintaining a balance of about 17%. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ - Concluding Remarks The study revealed a mean rise of 2.29m in the groundwater during the year 2014. This figure of groundwater resource balance is expected to improve over the years with continued monitoring study of the fluctuating trend of the groundwater levels with rain water harvesting implemented and last but not the least, an effective groundwater management. Total replenishable volume of water recharge = (Area x fluctuation x 0.03) + Total draft during the period Here, 0.03 is the specific yield considered for hard rock as per GEC, 1997 So, The volume of water recharged is 144270 m3 x 1000 = 144,270,000 liters Consumption from ground water for the study period is 19,54,000 x 7 x 30 = 410,340,000.00 liters Total Resource:- 410,340,000 + 144,270,000 = 554,610,000 liters Groundwater Resource Estimation and Management