SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 5
Download to read offline
Determination of Milky Way Rotation Curve Through Observation of Redshift of
1420.40 MHz Radiation
Daniel A. Bulhosa∗
MIT Department of Physics
(Dated: September 8, 2014)
In this experiment we used a 7.5 foot diameter parabolic dish and receiver designed by the
Haystack Observatory to determine the velocity curve of matter in the disk of the Milky Way. This
was accomplished by measuring spectra centered at the atomic hydrogen hyperfine transition line
of 1420.40 MHz and determining the velocity corresponding to the highest observed redshift. Our
measured values show reasonable agreement in the moderate to large radius regime with recently
published values. Consideration of the amount of matter contained within 8.33 kpc of the galaxy,
as suggested by the rotation curve, reveals a discrepancy between the observed amount of matter
and the matter necessary to create the measured orbital speeds of matter around the galaxy.
I. INTRODUCTION
Until the mid 20th Century our knowledge about the
Milky Way came from observations of the visible light
generated by the stars it contains. For example, lit-
tle was know about the dust and gas between the stars
whose motion we measure in this experiment (known as
the Interstellar Medium, or ISM), even after its existence
was proven by R.J. Trumpler in 1930 [1]. Then in 1932
Bell Laboratories employee and radio engineer Karl Jan-
sky discovered a periodic noise while carrying out exper-
iments related to the maximization of the signal to noise
ratio in radio communication [2]. Although Jansky be-
lieved at first that the spike might be due to the transit
of the sun across the celestial sphere, further analysis led
him to conclude that the peak of the noise was measured
when his device was pointed along the galactic plane in
the direction of Sagittarius. Jansky’s discovery marked
the birth of radio astronomy.
Physicist Jan Oort was one of the first people to rec-
ognize the importance radio emissions in the study of
the structure of the Milky Way. He prompted another
younger physicist, Hendrik van de Hulst to look for an
emission line that would be useful for radio astronomy.
Hulst proposed the detection of ground-state atomic hy-
drogen through its emission of 21-cm (1420.40 MHz) ra-
diowaves when its electron undergoes a hyperfine tran-
sition. Detection of ground-state atomic hydrogen is an
attractive pursuit as it is the predominant element in the
galaxy. Furthermore—partly because of its long wave-
length relative to the size of the atomic components of
the ISM—the associated 21-cm radiation undergoes lit-
tle extinction when travelling across interstellar space, so
that intervening matter does not obscure distant objects
within the galaxy.
In this experiment we used a small radio telescope
(SRT) to determine the rotation curve of the Milky Way
and learn about its matter distribution.
∗ dbulhosa@mit.edu
II. THEORY
The Milky Way is composed of a spheroidal component
and a flat disk component. The spheroidal component
has a radius of 30kpc or more, and has a bulge at the
center of diameter of about 3 kpc. The disk has a radius
of about 30 kpc and is composed of gas and a variety
of different tyoes of stars. The orbit of matter in the
galactic disk is very nearly circular [3].
Suppose that we point our antenna in the direction of
galactic longitude l along the galactic plane (see Figure
1). The beam of our antenna will intersect the circular
orbit of the matter in the disk of our galaxy at radius
R. Let P be the point of intersection nearest to the Sun,
then after application of the sine law one finds that the
speed of matter at P relative to the Earth in the direction
of the antenna beam is:
∆vb = v(R)
R
R
− vLSR sin(l)−(V +VEarth) (1)
Here v(R) is the speed of the matter at radius R, vLSR
is the mean speed of the matter in the neighborhood of
the Sun, and the last term accounts for the relative mo-
tions of the LSR, the Sun, and the Earth. If we make the
reasonable assumption that v(R) increases less than lin-
early with increasing R then we can see from (1) that for
a fixed l the maximum ∆vb occurs when R is minimized—
that is, when R is the radius of the orbit to which the
antenna beam is tangential. For this R we have by the
sine law that R sin(l) = R, so substituting into (1) an
rearranging terms we find an expression for v(R) which
holds whenever R < R .
When we detect electromagnetic emissions from the
galaxy within some frequency interval centered at
1420.40 MHz we observe a distribution of frequencies,
rather than a single peak at the center. This is due to
the motion of the matter in the galaxy, which causes the
light emitted by this matter to be Doppler shifted. Be-
tween galactic longitudes 0o
and 90o
the fastest moving
2
FIG. 1. This figure was adapted from [4]. Here γ = l is
the galactic longitude, which measures the angle between the
direction of our antenna beam and the center of the galaxy
along the galatic plane.
objects will be the ones emitting the most red-shifted fre-
quencies. The relation between the measured frequency
and the relative speed between the source and the Earth
along the antenna beam is given by:
∆vb = c
1420.40 MHz − fmeas
1420.40 MHz
(2)
Combining equations (1) and (2) we can use the maxi-
mum redshift measured by our telescope at a given lon-
gitude to determine v(R).
III. EXPERIMENTAL SETUP
A diagram of the apparatus is shown in Figure 2:
FIG. 2. A diagram of the different components of the appa-
ratus. The left box with the concave down curve drawn in it
stands for the first band-pass filter and the LNA. The other
similarly drawn box towards the right is the low-pass filter.
ADC stands for Analog to Digital Converter and L.O. stands
for Local Oscillator.
The dish of the antenna is made up of a C/Ku band
mesh. Radiation of wavelength at least ten times larger
than the size of the surface holes of the mesh is focused by
the dish onto the antenna feed [3]. The electromagnetic
waves reaching the antenna feed induce an AC signal in it.
That signal is pre-ampliflied and then passed through a
band-pass filter that transmits a 100 MHz band centered
at 1420.40 MHz. The filtered signal is then amplified
by the Low Noise Amplifier (LNA), which gives a 25 dB
amplification to signals with frequencies between 1400
MHz and 1440 MHz.
At the mixer, the amplified signal is combined with an
artificial signal from a local oscillator whose frequency f
is adjustable. The mixer outputs two signals, one is the
original signal that went in with all of the frequencies that
compose it shifted down by f, and the other is the original
signal with all the composing frequencies shifted up by
f. A low-pass filter then removes the second signal, and
the remaining signal is digitized. Once digitized the sig-
nal, which describes the power per unit time collected by
the antenna in the relevant bandwidth, is Fourier trans-
formed into a signal describing the amount of power con-
tributed by each frequency of radiation. This signal is
sent to the SRT software, which organizes, records, and
displays the data. A plot of the Fourier transformed raw
data is shown in Figure 3.
FIG. 3. Plot of the contribution of each frequency bin in the
bandwidth of interest to the total power measured. For each
measurement set there were 148-156 frequency bins spaced by
7.81 kHz. We can see in this plot the relative attenuation of
the frequency signals outside of the 40 MHz bandwidth the
amplifier amplifies. The information of interest is the fine
structure at the top of the curve shown.
We observed a spike in power at 1420.0 MHz. It
was determined that the spike was not of natural ori-
gin; rather, it was originated artificially in the direction
of Kendall Square. The presence of this spike did not
significantly affect our determination of the lowest fre-
quency of the measured distribution, though it increased
the systematic error in the determination of the highest
redshift of some of our measurement sets.
Calibration of the telescope is accomplished through
the use of a noise diode whose noise temperature is pre-
set at Tnoise ≈ 115 K. The telescope begins calibration by
measuring the average power it receives when the noise
3
diode is on, pwr1, the average power it receives when the
noise diode is off pwr0 and then calculating the following
temperatures [? ]:
Trcvr = Tnoise +
pwr0
pwr1 − pwr0
− Tspill (3)
Tsys = Trcvr + Tspill (4)
Here Tspill = 20 K is the amount of radio power in Kelvin
that the dish fails to reflect into the antenna feed. When
measuring the power, the SRT software processes the
power signal in various ways. At the final step of pro-
cessing the signal is multiplied by a quantity referred to
as calcons to yield the final result for the measured power.
The calibration process conclues when the SRT uses the
values it calculated for (3) and (4) to change the scale for
temperature by setting:
calcons =
Tsys × previous calcons
pwr0
(5)
The default setting for calcons if no calibrations have been
made is 1.0.
IV. PROCEDURE AND DATA ANALYSIS
FIG. 4. Detail of the top of the plot from Figure 3, which is
the raw spectrum for a 600-second exposure at l = 55. The
peak of the distribution is slightly redshifted away from 1420.4
MHz. The highest redshift in the figure was determined to be
about 1420.3 MHz.
We preformed a 600-second exposure for each galac-
tic longitude from 5 to 90 in steps of 5. The detail of
a measured spectrum is shown in Figure 4. We see that
the larger part of the distribution in this case is generally
redshifted, suggesting that the galactic matter closest to
the Sun in the direction of l = 55 is moving away from us.
Note also that the redshifted distribution is not a peak,
but rather a broad distribution of frequencies. This is
predominantly due to the fact that when the antenna
is pointed towards l = 55 its beam crosses multiple or-
bits concentric to the Sun’s, whose corresponding velocity
projections towards the Earth v(R)sin(δ) have different
values.
Formula (1) and our theoretical discussion predict a
maximum value for ∆vb and thus for the observed red-
shift, so any power measured in the far left of the spec-
trum should be exclusively due to noise. Thus we av-
eraged the power in this region to determine the mean
noise level, and then determined the leftmost frequency
of the central distribution with power above this level
to be the highest redshifted frequency. This procedure
was repeated for each spectrum we measured to deter-
mine fmeas(l). The resulting values for v(R) are shown
in Figure 5.
The error bars were calculated based on the estimated
systematic error associated with the determination of the
maximum redshifted frequency, the uncertainty of the
Sun’s distance from the galactic center, and the statisti-
cal error involved in the calculation of the last two terms
of equation (1) by the SRT software. These errors are
summarized in Table 1. The uncertainty in v(R) was pre-
dominantly due to the systematic error in the measured
frequency σfreq—for example, for l = 5 the 0.1MHz er-
ror in the frequency corresponds to a 10.55 km/s error
for v(R) so it is very clear in this case the other errors
were quite neglible.
FIG. 5. Orbital velocity of matter (atomic hydrogen) as a
function of its distance from the center of the galaxy. We
took the vLRS to be equal to 220 km/s.
A recent paper [5] determined the rotation curve of the
galaxy by following different tracer objects in it. The pa-
per contains a plot of the measured values of the velocity
curve given the assumption that vLSR = 220 km/s and
R = 8.5. For R > 3 kpc the values recorded in this plot
are within 1-2σ of our data points, lending credence to
our measured values in this range. Closer to the center
of the galaxy the difference between our measured values
and the papers grows, likely due to the limited resolu-
tion of our equipment and the relatively short time of
our exposures.
If we take the distribution of matter of the galaxy to be
spherically symmetric then Gauss’s Law, when combined
with the centripetal force equation, implies that:
4
l σfmax σv +vEarth σR v(R) ± σv(R)
5 0.1 0.03 0.06 67.09 ± 10.55
10 0.06 0.02 0.12 170.71 ± 21.11
15 0.06 0.02 0.18 185.89 ± 12.67
20 0.06 0.02 0.24 204.76 ± 12.68
25 0.05 0.02 0.30 216.78 ± 12.68
30 0.04 0.02 0.35 228.16 ± 10.59
35 0.04 0.02 0.40 234.58 ± 8.51
40 0.04 0.02 0.45 242.07 ± 8.52
45 0.05 0.02 0.49 244.60 ± 8.54
50 0.03 0.02 0.54 247.88 ± 10.64
55 0.04 0.02 0.57 247.79 ± 6.50
60 0.04 0.03 0.61 237.98 ± 8.59
65 0.03 0.03 0.63 239.57 ± 8.60
70 0.02 0.03 0.66 233.23 ± 6.56
75 0.03 0.02 0.67 235.85 ± 4.56
80 0.02 0.03 0.69 238.78 ± 6.58
85 0.03 0.02 0.70 238.21 ± 4.59
90 0.02 0.03 0.70 235.98 ± 6.58
TABLE I. This table summarizes the errors that were propa-
gated in order to determine the error in v(R). The second col-
umn gives the systematic error of frequency measured in MHz,
the third column gives the statistical error in the velocities cal-
culated by the SRT software in km/s, the forth column gives
the uncertainty in R due to uncertainty in R = 8.33 ± 0.35
kpc, and the last column gives the values of v(R) with the
final propagated error.
M(R) =
Rv(R)2
G
(6)
Figure 6 shows a plot of the mass as a function of the ra-
dius for this model. Note that it predicts that the sphere
of radius 8.33 kpc centered about the galaxy should have
a mass content of 1.08 ×1011
M . The sum of the masses
of the bulge and disk of the galaxy is approximately
8 × 1010
M [6]. If we assume that the galaxy has the
distribution of matter that is visible to us through elec-
tromagnetic radiation the spherical model we have as-
sumed will not give the exact value for M(R ), but it
should give a good order of magnitude estimate. This
being the case it seems we have just shown that there
is more mass towards the center of the galaxy than the
whole galaxy contains.
Clearly this poses an issue for our understanding of the
galaxy and gravity. The most popular proposed solution
to this discrepancy is the idea that the galaxy contains a
large amount of ”dark” matter that interacts weakly with
light, which would explain it has never been observed
directly [7]. The best current understanding is that there
is a halo of dark matter around our galaxy, and this halo
contains about 90 percent of the total mass of the galaxy
[8]. Since the halo is spherically symmetric and contains
FIG. 6. A plot of the amount of matter contained within
radius R based on a spherically symmetric model of matter
distribution. The error bars were calculated based on the
uncertainty of v(R) and R.
most of the mass of the galaxy Figure 6 should in fact be
a reasonable approximation to M(R) for the Milky Way.
V. CONCLUSIONS
We exploited the properties of the 1420.40 MHz line
emitted by atomic hydrogen to determine the orbital
speeds of matter around the galaxy at different distances
from its center. The data we found agreed well with
recently published data for values of R > 3 kpc. By
deriving the amount of matter that should be contained
within the orbit of the Solar System based on the veloc-
ity curve for the Milky Way we concluded the amount of
matter visible in the galaxy is not sufficient to account
for the fast motion of galactic objects. This conclusion
conforms to the current theory that the galaxy is predom-
inantly composed of dark matter, which is the ”missing
mass” whose gravitational pull causes objects to move
faster around the galaxy than could be explained by the
presence of the matter we can see alone.
5
[1] F. H. Shu, The Physical Universe: An Introduction to
Astronomy (University Science Books, 1982).
[2] “Jansky, Karl (1905-1950),” (2007).
[3] 21 cm Radio Astrophysics, MIT Department of Physics.
[4] J. D. Kraus, Radio Astronomy (Cygnus-Quasar Books,
1986).
[5] P. Bhattacharjee, S. Chaudhury, and S. Kundu,
arXiv:1310.2659v2 [astro-ph.GA] (2013).
[6] J. E. Barnes, “Populations and Components of the Milky
Way,” Accessed on 2-11-2013.
[7] V. Trimble, Annual Review of Astronomy and Astro-
physics (1987).
[8] Battaglia et. al., Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronom-
ical Society (2005).

More Related Content

What's hot

Fukao Plenary4.pdf
Fukao Plenary4.pdfFukao Plenary4.pdf
Fukao Plenary4.pdfgrssieee
 
Fukao Plenary.ppt
Fukao Plenary.pptFukao Plenary.ppt
Fukao Plenary.pptgrssieee
 
Pulsar emission amplified and resolved by plasma lensing in an eclipsing binary
Pulsar emission amplified and resolved by plasma lensing in an eclipsing binaryPulsar emission amplified and resolved by plasma lensing in an eclipsing binary
Pulsar emission amplified and resolved by plasma lensing in an eclipsing binarySérgio Sacani
 
S4 oman wind energy lidar sodar 2016
S4 oman wind energy lidar sodar 2016S4 oman wind energy lidar sodar 2016
S4 oman wind energy lidar sodar 2016CETN
 
Binary pulsars as tools to study gravity
Binary pulsars as tools to study gravityBinary pulsars as tools to study gravity
Binary pulsars as tools to study gravityCosmoAIMS Bassett
 
S4 oman wind energy speed direction 2016
S4 oman wind energy speed direction 2016S4 oman wind energy speed direction 2016
S4 oman wind energy speed direction 2016CETN
 
Wind Energy Lecture slides
Wind Energy Lecture slidesWind Energy Lecture slides
Wind Energy Lecture slidesKeith Vaugh
 
The bright optical_flash_and_afterglow_from_the_gamma_ray_burst_grb_130427a
The bright optical_flash_and_afterglow_from_the_gamma_ray_burst_grb_130427aThe bright optical_flash_and_afterglow_from_the_gamma_ray_burst_grb_130427a
The bright optical_flash_and_afterglow_from_the_gamma_ray_burst_grb_130427aSérgio Sacani
 
Wave Lab
Wave LabWave Lab
Wave Labkelseyn
 
132777 633668725440151250
132777 633668725440151250132777 633668725440151250
132777 633668725440151250RRFF
 
Some possible interpretations from data of the CODALEMA experiment
Some possible interpretations from data of the CODALEMA experimentSome possible interpretations from data of the CODALEMA experiment
Some possible interpretations from data of the CODALEMA experimentAhmed Ammar Rebai PhD
 
A model for non-circular orbits derived from a two-step linearisation of the ...
A model for non-circular orbits derived from a two-step linearisation of the ...A model for non-circular orbits derived from a two-step linearisation of the ...
A model for non-circular orbits derived from a two-step linearisation of the ...Premier Publishers
 
Standing waves
Standing wavesStanding waves
Standing wavesMidoOoz
 

What's hot (20)

Fukao Plenary4.pdf
Fukao Plenary4.pdfFukao Plenary4.pdf
Fukao Plenary4.pdf
 
L6 Wind Energy
L6  Wind EnergyL6  Wind Energy
L6 Wind Energy
 
Fukao Plenary.ppt
Fukao Plenary.pptFukao Plenary.ppt
Fukao Plenary.ppt
 
Seismic velocity analysis _ aghazade
Seismic velocity analysis _ aghazadeSeismic velocity analysis _ aghazade
Seismic velocity analysis _ aghazade
 
ex_abs_framework-2
ex_abs_framework-2ex_abs_framework-2
ex_abs_framework-2
 
LabReport (2)
LabReport (2)LabReport (2)
LabReport (2)
 
Pulsar emission amplified and resolved by plasma lensing in an eclipsing binary
Pulsar emission amplified and resolved by plasma lensing in an eclipsing binaryPulsar emission amplified and resolved by plasma lensing in an eclipsing binary
Pulsar emission amplified and resolved by plasma lensing in an eclipsing binary
 
S4 oman wind energy lidar sodar 2016
S4 oman wind energy lidar sodar 2016S4 oman wind energy lidar sodar 2016
S4 oman wind energy lidar sodar 2016
 
Binary pulsars as tools to study gravity
Binary pulsars as tools to study gravityBinary pulsars as tools to study gravity
Binary pulsars as tools to study gravity
 
S4 oman wind energy speed direction 2016
S4 oman wind energy speed direction 2016S4 oman wind energy speed direction 2016
S4 oman wind energy speed direction 2016
 
Wind Energy Lecture slides
Wind Energy Lecture slidesWind Energy Lecture slides
Wind Energy Lecture slides
 
Physics notes revision
Physics notes revisionPhysics notes revision
Physics notes revision
 
The bright optical_flash_and_afterglow_from_the_gamma_ray_burst_grb_130427a
The bright optical_flash_and_afterglow_from_the_gamma_ray_burst_grb_130427aThe bright optical_flash_and_afterglow_from_the_gamma_ray_burst_grb_130427a
The bright optical_flash_and_afterglow_from_the_gamma_ray_burst_grb_130427a
 
Wave Lab
Wave LabWave Lab
Wave Lab
 
S044068791
S044068791S044068791
S044068791
 
132777 633668725440151250
132777 633668725440151250132777 633668725440151250
132777 633668725440151250
 
Some possible interpretations from data of the CODALEMA experiment
Some possible interpretations from data of the CODALEMA experimentSome possible interpretations from data of the CODALEMA experiment
Some possible interpretations from data of the CODALEMA experiment
 
Astronomy
AstronomyAstronomy
Astronomy
 
A model for non-circular orbits derived from a two-step linearisation of the ...
A model for non-circular orbits derived from a two-step linearisation of the ...A model for non-circular orbits derived from a two-step linearisation of the ...
A model for non-circular orbits derived from a two-step linearisation of the ...
 
Standing waves
Standing wavesStanding waves
Standing waves
 

Viewers also liked

Test 1 mayela lópez laparra
Test  1  mayela lópez laparraTest  1  mayela lópez laparra
Test 1 mayela lópez laparraMayela López
 
Project Presentation Paper
Project Presentation PaperProject Presentation Paper
Project Presentation PaperHarvey Brittain
 
ingeniería industrial
ingeniería industrialingeniería industrial
ingeniería industrialdaniel diaz
 
Iris Jong New Sector Presentation_Term 1_v2
Iris Jong New Sector Presentation_Term 1_v2Iris Jong New Sector Presentation_Term 1_v2
Iris Jong New Sector Presentation_Term 1_v2Iris Jong
 
Riesgos laborales rubexa namia
Riesgos laborales rubexa namiaRiesgos laborales rubexa namia
Riesgos laborales rubexa namiarubexa2 namia
 
вологда лыжный поход 2015
вологда лыжный поход 2015вологда лыжный поход 2015
вологда лыжный поход 2015Vlad Safianov
 
Федеральная программа «Ты – предприниматель» (Самарская область). Модуль-3....
Федеральная программа «Ты – предприниматель» (Самарская область). Модуль-3....Федеральная программа «Ты – предприниматель» (Самарская область). Модуль-3....
Федеральная программа «Ты – предприниматель» (Самарская область). Модуль-3....Gedocorp | Гедокорп
 
Kurtz Marketing Code LLC WebDesign PowerPoint
Kurtz Marketing Code LLC WebDesign PowerPointKurtz Marketing Code LLC WebDesign PowerPoint
Kurtz Marketing Code LLC WebDesign PowerPointKurtz Marketing Code LLC
 
Sullivan Masters Paper
Sullivan Masters PaperSullivan Masters Paper
Sullivan Masters PaperTessa Sullivan
 
BALAJI K _Resume
BALAJI K _ResumeBALAJI K _Resume
BALAJI K _ResumeBalaji K
 

Viewers also liked (17)

Propiedadesdelarandano
PropiedadesdelarandanoPropiedadesdelarandano
Propiedadesdelarandano
 
Test 1 mayela lópez laparra
Test  1  mayela lópez laparraTest  1  mayela lópez laparra
Test 1 mayela lópez laparra
 
Project Presentation Paper
Project Presentation PaperProject Presentation Paper
Project Presentation Paper
 
ingeniería industrial
ingeniería industrialingeniería industrial
ingeniería industrial
 
Club de lecteurs
Club de lecteursClub de lecteurs
Club de lecteurs
 
Iris Jong New Sector Presentation_Term 1_v2
Iris Jong New Sector Presentation_Term 1_v2Iris Jong New Sector Presentation_Term 1_v2
Iris Jong New Sector Presentation_Term 1_v2
 
Riesgos laborales rubexa namia
Riesgos laborales rubexa namiaRiesgos laborales rubexa namia
Riesgos laborales rubexa namia
 
1500-29 Final Syllabus
1500-29 Final Syllabus1500-29 Final Syllabus
1500-29 Final Syllabus
 
Programme 2015 (V5)
Programme 2015 (V5)Programme 2015 (V5)
Programme 2015 (V5)
 
Hang fire
Hang fireHang fire
Hang fire
 
Resume 2
Resume 2Resume 2
Resume 2
 
Fiesta maria
Fiesta mariaFiesta maria
Fiesta maria
 
вологда лыжный поход 2015
вологда лыжный поход 2015вологда лыжный поход 2015
вологда лыжный поход 2015
 
Федеральная программа «Ты – предприниматель» (Самарская область). Модуль-3....
Федеральная программа «Ты – предприниматель» (Самарская область). Модуль-3....Федеральная программа «Ты – предприниматель» (Самарская область). Модуль-3....
Федеральная программа «Ты – предприниматель» (Самарская область). Модуль-3....
 
Kurtz Marketing Code LLC WebDesign PowerPoint
Kurtz Marketing Code LLC WebDesign PowerPointKurtz Marketing Code LLC WebDesign PowerPoint
Kurtz Marketing Code LLC WebDesign PowerPoint
 
Sullivan Masters Paper
Sullivan Masters PaperSullivan Masters Paper
Sullivan Masters Paper
 
BALAJI K _Resume
BALAJI K _ResumeBALAJI K _Resume
BALAJI K _Resume
 

Similar to Determination of Milky Way Rotation Curve Through Observation of Redshift of 1420.40 MHz Radiation

An absorption profile centred at 78 megahertz in the sky-averaged spectrum
An absorption profile centred at 78 megahertz in the sky-averaged spectrumAn absorption profile centred at 78 megahertz in the sky-averaged spectrum
An absorption profile centred at 78 megahertz in the sky-averaged spectrumSérgio Sacani
 
NRAO2020RadioChicago
NRAO2020RadioChicagoNRAO2020RadioChicago
NRAO2020RadioChicagoJr-Wei Tsai
 
Line of-sight propagation by najmul hoque munshi
Line of-sight propagation by najmul hoque munshiLine of-sight propagation by najmul hoque munshi
Line of-sight propagation by najmul hoque munshiNajmulHoqueMunshi
 
2006 B Kontogeorgos&Al
2006 B Kontogeorgos&Al2006 B Kontogeorgos&Al
2006 B Kontogeorgos&Alpetousis
 
Radioastron observations of_the_quasar_3_c273_a_challenge_to_the_brightness_t...
Radioastron observations of_the_quasar_3_c273_a_challenge_to_the_brightness_t...Radioastron observations of_the_quasar_3_c273_a_challenge_to_the_brightness_t...
Radioastron observations of_the_quasar_3_c273_a_challenge_to_the_brightness_t...Sérgio Sacani
 
Electro magnetic radiation principles.pdf
Electro magnetic radiation principles.pdfElectro magnetic radiation principles.pdf
Electro magnetic radiation principles.pdfssusera1eccd
 
Towards the identification of the primary particle nature by the radiodetecti...
Towards the identification of the primary particle nature by the radiodetecti...Towards the identification of the primary particle nature by the radiodetecti...
Towards the identification of the primary particle nature by the radiodetecti...Ahmed Ammar Rebai PhD
 
Optical interferometery to detect sound waves as an analogue for gravitationa...
Optical interferometery to detect sound waves as an analogue for gravitationa...Optical interferometery to detect sound waves as an analogue for gravitationa...
Optical interferometery to detect sound waves as an analogue for gravitationa...Thomas Actn
 
6. IR Spectroscopy 2022.pptx
6. IR Spectroscopy 2022.pptx6. IR Spectroscopy 2022.pptx
6. IR Spectroscopy 2022.pptxWilliamkambi
 
1101.6015 v1 radio_beam_vorticity_and_orbital_angular_momentum
1101.6015 v1 radio_beam_vorticity_and_orbital_angular_momentum1101.6015 v1 radio_beam_vorticity_and_orbital_angular_momentum
1101.6015 v1 radio_beam_vorticity_and_orbital_angular_momentumBlundering boffins exposed
 
2k19–Nuclear Physics–01.pdf
2k19–Nuclear Physics–01.pdf2k19–Nuclear Physics–01.pdf
2k19–Nuclear Physics–01.pdfNamrata Ajwani
 
Towards the identification of the primary particle nature by the radiodetecti...
Towards the identification of the primary particle nature by the radiodetecti...Towards the identification of the primary particle nature by the radiodetecti...
Towards the identification of the primary particle nature by the radiodetecti...Ahmed Ammar Rebai PhD
 
Informe de enlace de radion enlace
Informe de enlace de radion enlaceInforme de enlace de radion enlace
Informe de enlace de radion enlaceDaniel Nunura
 

Similar to Determination of Milky Way Rotation Curve Through Observation of Redshift of 1420.40 MHz Radiation (20)

An absorption profile centred at 78 megahertz in the sky-averaged spectrum
An absorption profile centred at 78 megahertz in the sky-averaged spectrumAn absorption profile centred at 78 megahertz in the sky-averaged spectrum
An absorption profile centred at 78 megahertz in the sky-averaged spectrum
 
NRAO2020RadioChicago
NRAO2020RadioChicagoNRAO2020RadioChicago
NRAO2020RadioChicago
 
Line of-sight propagation by najmul hoque munshi
Line of-sight propagation by najmul hoque munshiLine of-sight propagation by najmul hoque munshi
Line of-sight propagation by najmul hoque munshi
 
Presentation.pptx
Presentation.pptxPresentation.pptx
Presentation.pptx
 
Gravitational Radiation
Gravitational RadiationGravitational Radiation
Gravitational Radiation
 
2006 B Kontogeorgos&Al
2006 B Kontogeorgos&Al2006 B Kontogeorgos&Al
2006 B Kontogeorgos&Al
 
Lecture №2
 Lecture №2 Lecture №2
Lecture №2
 
Radioastron observations of_the_quasar_3_c273_a_challenge_to_the_brightness_t...
Radioastron observations of_the_quasar_3_c273_a_challenge_to_the_brightness_t...Radioastron observations of_the_quasar_3_c273_a_challenge_to_the_brightness_t...
Radioastron observations of_the_quasar_3_c273_a_challenge_to_the_brightness_t...
 
CRWriteup
CRWriteupCRWriteup
CRWriteup
 
Electro magnetic radiation principles.pdf
Electro magnetic radiation principles.pdfElectro magnetic radiation principles.pdf
Electro magnetic radiation principles.pdf
 
Towards the identification of the primary particle nature by the radiodetecti...
Towards the identification of the primary particle nature by the radiodetecti...Towards the identification of the primary particle nature by the radiodetecti...
Towards the identification of the primary particle nature by the radiodetecti...
 
Sband lunar radar
Sband lunar radarSband lunar radar
Sband lunar radar
 
B0330107
B0330107B0330107
B0330107
 
Optical interferometery to detect sound waves as an analogue for gravitationa...
Optical interferometery to detect sound waves as an analogue for gravitationa...Optical interferometery to detect sound waves as an analogue for gravitationa...
Optical interferometery to detect sound waves as an analogue for gravitationa...
 
6. IR Spectroscopy 2022.pptx
6. IR Spectroscopy 2022.pptx6. IR Spectroscopy 2022.pptx
6. IR Spectroscopy 2022.pptx
 
1101.6015 v1 radio_beam_vorticity_and_orbital_angular_momentum
1101.6015 v1 radio_beam_vorticity_and_orbital_angular_momentum1101.6015 v1 radio_beam_vorticity_and_orbital_angular_momentum
1101.6015 v1 radio_beam_vorticity_and_orbital_angular_momentum
 
2k19–Nuclear Physics–01.pdf
2k19–Nuclear Physics–01.pdf2k19–Nuclear Physics–01.pdf
2k19–Nuclear Physics–01.pdf
 
Towards the identification of the primary particle nature by the radiodetecti...
Towards the identification of the primary particle nature by the radiodetecti...Towards the identification of the primary particle nature by the radiodetecti...
Towards the identification of the primary particle nature by the radiodetecti...
 
Informe de enlace de radion enlace
Informe de enlace de radion enlaceInforme de enlace de radion enlace
Informe de enlace de radion enlace
 
Quantum theory of radiation
Quantum theory of radiationQuantum theory of radiation
Quantum theory of radiation
 

Determination of Milky Way Rotation Curve Through Observation of Redshift of 1420.40 MHz Radiation

  • 1. Determination of Milky Way Rotation Curve Through Observation of Redshift of 1420.40 MHz Radiation Daniel A. Bulhosa∗ MIT Department of Physics (Dated: September 8, 2014) In this experiment we used a 7.5 foot diameter parabolic dish and receiver designed by the Haystack Observatory to determine the velocity curve of matter in the disk of the Milky Way. This was accomplished by measuring spectra centered at the atomic hydrogen hyperfine transition line of 1420.40 MHz and determining the velocity corresponding to the highest observed redshift. Our measured values show reasonable agreement in the moderate to large radius regime with recently published values. Consideration of the amount of matter contained within 8.33 kpc of the galaxy, as suggested by the rotation curve, reveals a discrepancy between the observed amount of matter and the matter necessary to create the measured orbital speeds of matter around the galaxy. I. INTRODUCTION Until the mid 20th Century our knowledge about the Milky Way came from observations of the visible light generated by the stars it contains. For example, lit- tle was know about the dust and gas between the stars whose motion we measure in this experiment (known as the Interstellar Medium, or ISM), even after its existence was proven by R.J. Trumpler in 1930 [1]. Then in 1932 Bell Laboratories employee and radio engineer Karl Jan- sky discovered a periodic noise while carrying out exper- iments related to the maximization of the signal to noise ratio in radio communication [2]. Although Jansky be- lieved at first that the spike might be due to the transit of the sun across the celestial sphere, further analysis led him to conclude that the peak of the noise was measured when his device was pointed along the galactic plane in the direction of Sagittarius. Jansky’s discovery marked the birth of radio astronomy. Physicist Jan Oort was one of the first people to rec- ognize the importance radio emissions in the study of the structure of the Milky Way. He prompted another younger physicist, Hendrik van de Hulst to look for an emission line that would be useful for radio astronomy. Hulst proposed the detection of ground-state atomic hy- drogen through its emission of 21-cm (1420.40 MHz) ra- diowaves when its electron undergoes a hyperfine tran- sition. Detection of ground-state atomic hydrogen is an attractive pursuit as it is the predominant element in the galaxy. Furthermore—partly because of its long wave- length relative to the size of the atomic components of the ISM—the associated 21-cm radiation undergoes lit- tle extinction when travelling across interstellar space, so that intervening matter does not obscure distant objects within the galaxy. In this experiment we used a small radio telescope (SRT) to determine the rotation curve of the Milky Way and learn about its matter distribution. ∗ dbulhosa@mit.edu II. THEORY The Milky Way is composed of a spheroidal component and a flat disk component. The spheroidal component has a radius of 30kpc or more, and has a bulge at the center of diameter of about 3 kpc. The disk has a radius of about 30 kpc and is composed of gas and a variety of different tyoes of stars. The orbit of matter in the galactic disk is very nearly circular [3]. Suppose that we point our antenna in the direction of galactic longitude l along the galactic plane (see Figure 1). The beam of our antenna will intersect the circular orbit of the matter in the disk of our galaxy at radius R. Let P be the point of intersection nearest to the Sun, then after application of the sine law one finds that the speed of matter at P relative to the Earth in the direction of the antenna beam is: ∆vb = v(R) R R − vLSR sin(l)−(V +VEarth) (1) Here v(R) is the speed of the matter at radius R, vLSR is the mean speed of the matter in the neighborhood of the Sun, and the last term accounts for the relative mo- tions of the LSR, the Sun, and the Earth. If we make the reasonable assumption that v(R) increases less than lin- early with increasing R then we can see from (1) that for a fixed l the maximum ∆vb occurs when R is minimized— that is, when R is the radius of the orbit to which the antenna beam is tangential. For this R we have by the sine law that R sin(l) = R, so substituting into (1) an rearranging terms we find an expression for v(R) which holds whenever R < R . When we detect electromagnetic emissions from the galaxy within some frequency interval centered at 1420.40 MHz we observe a distribution of frequencies, rather than a single peak at the center. This is due to the motion of the matter in the galaxy, which causes the light emitted by this matter to be Doppler shifted. Be- tween galactic longitudes 0o and 90o the fastest moving
  • 2. 2 FIG. 1. This figure was adapted from [4]. Here γ = l is the galactic longitude, which measures the angle between the direction of our antenna beam and the center of the galaxy along the galatic plane. objects will be the ones emitting the most red-shifted fre- quencies. The relation between the measured frequency and the relative speed between the source and the Earth along the antenna beam is given by: ∆vb = c 1420.40 MHz − fmeas 1420.40 MHz (2) Combining equations (1) and (2) we can use the maxi- mum redshift measured by our telescope at a given lon- gitude to determine v(R). III. EXPERIMENTAL SETUP A diagram of the apparatus is shown in Figure 2: FIG. 2. A diagram of the different components of the appa- ratus. The left box with the concave down curve drawn in it stands for the first band-pass filter and the LNA. The other similarly drawn box towards the right is the low-pass filter. ADC stands for Analog to Digital Converter and L.O. stands for Local Oscillator. The dish of the antenna is made up of a C/Ku band mesh. Radiation of wavelength at least ten times larger than the size of the surface holes of the mesh is focused by the dish onto the antenna feed [3]. The electromagnetic waves reaching the antenna feed induce an AC signal in it. That signal is pre-ampliflied and then passed through a band-pass filter that transmits a 100 MHz band centered at 1420.40 MHz. The filtered signal is then amplified by the Low Noise Amplifier (LNA), which gives a 25 dB amplification to signals with frequencies between 1400 MHz and 1440 MHz. At the mixer, the amplified signal is combined with an artificial signal from a local oscillator whose frequency f is adjustable. The mixer outputs two signals, one is the original signal that went in with all of the frequencies that compose it shifted down by f, and the other is the original signal with all the composing frequencies shifted up by f. A low-pass filter then removes the second signal, and the remaining signal is digitized. Once digitized the sig- nal, which describes the power per unit time collected by the antenna in the relevant bandwidth, is Fourier trans- formed into a signal describing the amount of power con- tributed by each frequency of radiation. This signal is sent to the SRT software, which organizes, records, and displays the data. A plot of the Fourier transformed raw data is shown in Figure 3. FIG. 3. Plot of the contribution of each frequency bin in the bandwidth of interest to the total power measured. For each measurement set there were 148-156 frequency bins spaced by 7.81 kHz. We can see in this plot the relative attenuation of the frequency signals outside of the 40 MHz bandwidth the amplifier amplifies. The information of interest is the fine structure at the top of the curve shown. We observed a spike in power at 1420.0 MHz. It was determined that the spike was not of natural ori- gin; rather, it was originated artificially in the direction of Kendall Square. The presence of this spike did not significantly affect our determination of the lowest fre- quency of the measured distribution, though it increased the systematic error in the determination of the highest redshift of some of our measurement sets. Calibration of the telescope is accomplished through the use of a noise diode whose noise temperature is pre- set at Tnoise ≈ 115 K. The telescope begins calibration by measuring the average power it receives when the noise
  • 3. 3 diode is on, pwr1, the average power it receives when the noise diode is off pwr0 and then calculating the following temperatures [? ]: Trcvr = Tnoise + pwr0 pwr1 − pwr0 − Tspill (3) Tsys = Trcvr + Tspill (4) Here Tspill = 20 K is the amount of radio power in Kelvin that the dish fails to reflect into the antenna feed. When measuring the power, the SRT software processes the power signal in various ways. At the final step of pro- cessing the signal is multiplied by a quantity referred to as calcons to yield the final result for the measured power. The calibration process conclues when the SRT uses the values it calculated for (3) and (4) to change the scale for temperature by setting: calcons = Tsys × previous calcons pwr0 (5) The default setting for calcons if no calibrations have been made is 1.0. IV. PROCEDURE AND DATA ANALYSIS FIG. 4. Detail of the top of the plot from Figure 3, which is the raw spectrum for a 600-second exposure at l = 55. The peak of the distribution is slightly redshifted away from 1420.4 MHz. The highest redshift in the figure was determined to be about 1420.3 MHz. We preformed a 600-second exposure for each galac- tic longitude from 5 to 90 in steps of 5. The detail of a measured spectrum is shown in Figure 4. We see that the larger part of the distribution in this case is generally redshifted, suggesting that the galactic matter closest to the Sun in the direction of l = 55 is moving away from us. Note also that the redshifted distribution is not a peak, but rather a broad distribution of frequencies. This is predominantly due to the fact that when the antenna is pointed towards l = 55 its beam crosses multiple or- bits concentric to the Sun’s, whose corresponding velocity projections towards the Earth v(R)sin(δ) have different values. Formula (1) and our theoretical discussion predict a maximum value for ∆vb and thus for the observed red- shift, so any power measured in the far left of the spec- trum should be exclusively due to noise. Thus we av- eraged the power in this region to determine the mean noise level, and then determined the leftmost frequency of the central distribution with power above this level to be the highest redshifted frequency. This procedure was repeated for each spectrum we measured to deter- mine fmeas(l). The resulting values for v(R) are shown in Figure 5. The error bars were calculated based on the estimated systematic error associated with the determination of the maximum redshifted frequency, the uncertainty of the Sun’s distance from the galactic center, and the statisti- cal error involved in the calculation of the last two terms of equation (1) by the SRT software. These errors are summarized in Table 1. The uncertainty in v(R) was pre- dominantly due to the systematic error in the measured frequency σfreq—for example, for l = 5 the 0.1MHz er- ror in the frequency corresponds to a 10.55 km/s error for v(R) so it is very clear in this case the other errors were quite neglible. FIG. 5. Orbital velocity of matter (atomic hydrogen) as a function of its distance from the center of the galaxy. We took the vLRS to be equal to 220 km/s. A recent paper [5] determined the rotation curve of the galaxy by following different tracer objects in it. The pa- per contains a plot of the measured values of the velocity curve given the assumption that vLSR = 220 km/s and R = 8.5. For R > 3 kpc the values recorded in this plot are within 1-2σ of our data points, lending credence to our measured values in this range. Closer to the center of the galaxy the difference between our measured values and the papers grows, likely due to the limited resolu- tion of our equipment and the relatively short time of our exposures. If we take the distribution of matter of the galaxy to be spherically symmetric then Gauss’s Law, when combined with the centripetal force equation, implies that:
  • 4. 4 l σfmax σv +vEarth σR v(R) ± σv(R) 5 0.1 0.03 0.06 67.09 ± 10.55 10 0.06 0.02 0.12 170.71 ± 21.11 15 0.06 0.02 0.18 185.89 ± 12.67 20 0.06 0.02 0.24 204.76 ± 12.68 25 0.05 0.02 0.30 216.78 ± 12.68 30 0.04 0.02 0.35 228.16 ± 10.59 35 0.04 0.02 0.40 234.58 ± 8.51 40 0.04 0.02 0.45 242.07 ± 8.52 45 0.05 0.02 0.49 244.60 ± 8.54 50 0.03 0.02 0.54 247.88 ± 10.64 55 0.04 0.02 0.57 247.79 ± 6.50 60 0.04 0.03 0.61 237.98 ± 8.59 65 0.03 0.03 0.63 239.57 ± 8.60 70 0.02 0.03 0.66 233.23 ± 6.56 75 0.03 0.02 0.67 235.85 ± 4.56 80 0.02 0.03 0.69 238.78 ± 6.58 85 0.03 0.02 0.70 238.21 ± 4.59 90 0.02 0.03 0.70 235.98 ± 6.58 TABLE I. This table summarizes the errors that were propa- gated in order to determine the error in v(R). The second col- umn gives the systematic error of frequency measured in MHz, the third column gives the statistical error in the velocities cal- culated by the SRT software in km/s, the forth column gives the uncertainty in R due to uncertainty in R = 8.33 ± 0.35 kpc, and the last column gives the values of v(R) with the final propagated error. M(R) = Rv(R)2 G (6) Figure 6 shows a plot of the mass as a function of the ra- dius for this model. Note that it predicts that the sphere of radius 8.33 kpc centered about the galaxy should have a mass content of 1.08 ×1011 M . The sum of the masses of the bulge and disk of the galaxy is approximately 8 × 1010 M [6]. If we assume that the galaxy has the distribution of matter that is visible to us through elec- tromagnetic radiation the spherical model we have as- sumed will not give the exact value for M(R ), but it should give a good order of magnitude estimate. This being the case it seems we have just shown that there is more mass towards the center of the galaxy than the whole galaxy contains. Clearly this poses an issue for our understanding of the galaxy and gravity. The most popular proposed solution to this discrepancy is the idea that the galaxy contains a large amount of ”dark” matter that interacts weakly with light, which would explain it has never been observed directly [7]. The best current understanding is that there is a halo of dark matter around our galaxy, and this halo contains about 90 percent of the total mass of the galaxy [8]. Since the halo is spherically symmetric and contains FIG. 6. A plot of the amount of matter contained within radius R based on a spherically symmetric model of matter distribution. The error bars were calculated based on the uncertainty of v(R) and R. most of the mass of the galaxy Figure 6 should in fact be a reasonable approximation to M(R) for the Milky Way. V. CONCLUSIONS We exploited the properties of the 1420.40 MHz line emitted by atomic hydrogen to determine the orbital speeds of matter around the galaxy at different distances from its center. The data we found agreed well with recently published data for values of R > 3 kpc. By deriving the amount of matter that should be contained within the orbit of the Solar System based on the veloc- ity curve for the Milky Way we concluded the amount of matter visible in the galaxy is not sufficient to account for the fast motion of galactic objects. This conclusion conforms to the current theory that the galaxy is predom- inantly composed of dark matter, which is the ”missing mass” whose gravitational pull causes objects to move faster around the galaxy than could be explained by the presence of the matter we can see alone.
  • 5. 5 [1] F. H. Shu, The Physical Universe: An Introduction to Astronomy (University Science Books, 1982). [2] “Jansky, Karl (1905-1950),” (2007). [3] 21 cm Radio Astrophysics, MIT Department of Physics. [4] J. D. Kraus, Radio Astronomy (Cygnus-Quasar Books, 1986). [5] P. Bhattacharjee, S. Chaudhury, and S. Kundu, arXiv:1310.2659v2 [astro-ph.GA] (2013). [6] J. E. Barnes, “Populations and Components of the Milky Way,” Accessed on 2-11-2013. [7] V. Trimble, Annual Review of Astronomy and Astro- physics (1987). [8] Battaglia et. al., Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronom- ical Society (2005).