Hybridoma Technology ( Production , Purification , and Application )
"Waiting For Godot": Literary Analysis
1. Name :- Gohil Devangiba
Aniruddhsinh
Roll No. :- 14
Email Id :-
devangibagohil786@gamil.com
Paper No. :- :- 9 (The Modernist
Literature)
Topic :- “Waiting For Godot”:
Literary Analysis
Submitted To :- Department Of
English M.K.B.University
2. Samuel Beckett
Samuel was born in Dublin 1906 and
graduated from Trinity College.
He lived most of his life in Paris, where he
died in 1989.
Waiting for Godot was originally written in
French and was translate by the author. One
of the most important writers of our time,
Samuel Beckett was awarded the Nobel Prize
for Literature in 1969.
3. "Waiting for Godot"
"Waiting for Godot" is a play in which two
characters Vladimir and Estragon await the arrival
of Godot. A person whom they've never met. As
they sit there waiting for Godot they aren't sure if
they are in the correct place or if its the correct day.
They come across two individuals by the name of
Lucky and Pozzo. At the end of the day a little boy
appears which seems to be Godot's messenger he
tells Vladimir and Estragon that Godot wont be
able to make it that day but he will for sure be there
tomorrow. The next day Vladimir and Estragon sit
in the same place waiting for Godot but this time
something seems different even though nothing has
changed. They do the same thing as the day before.
And like in the first act Godot never shows up and
Vladimir and Estragon stay another day to wait for
him.
4. Characters
Vladimir
more intellectual
he has the better memory
he’s more logical
Estragon depends on him for his
life.
Estragon
tramp with a sore foot. He wears boots
and a bowler hat. He is obsessed with his
needs, his health and his hunger.
has a chronically poor memory,
struggles ineptly with his boots, needs to
be told what to do
spends most of his time trying to fall
asleep, unless he’s sleeping already.
5. Pozzo Lucky
Pozzo is tyrannical, cruel, focused
only on himself
A harsh slave master whose
arrogance and pride annoys the
two tramps. Later in the play, he
suddenly becomes blind
Pozzo’s slave.
He is abused physically and
verbally, made to work to the point
of exhaustion, and denied any
opportunity to act of his own
accord.
He is led around on a rope. In the
second act, he becomes mute.
6. Boy Godot
He is sent by Godot to tell the
tramps he will not arrive today.
The messenger boy periodically
reveals bits of information about
the mysterious Godot.
Godot isn’t really a character. Or, at least,
we can’t be sure if he’s a character or not.
An unseen person for whom Vladimir and
Estragon are waiting. All that is known about
Godot is that he has goatherds and
shepherds and a long white beard. He does
nothing all day, and has asked the tramps to
meet him by the tree on Saturday. He never
appears.
7. Memory's role in the Play
It might seem strange to the reader
why the character can remember far
back into the past, but not what occured
yesterday
from playing with the mind of the
characters, every yesterday just another
normal day because of the memory's that
are randomly cleared
there is no progression in the play, this
is why they are stuck in an unending
cycle of actions
they wait for "Godot" everyday at the
same spot, they play the same games,
and ask similar questions, which in turn
repeats everyday they spend together
8. Effect created by the relationship Vladimir
and Estragon Present
when reading the play or even
hearing it being read, the person
listening to the words will most
likely fluster because the reader
isn't able to find the differences in
the characters
this is why the differences are as
important as the similarities
between them
because Vladimir is the more
potent of the two, whatever action
he displays, Estragon follows, this
continues throughout the play
11. What is the relevance of some scenes?
Ex. When the hat swapping scene
occurs, we see that Vladimir and Estragon
repeatedly exchange hats
these kind of scene have little relevance
to what is actually happening in the play,
this is just a way to give the reader a bit of
humor and pass time
Why do they stay together?
12. Historical Context and Theatre of the absurd
Theatre of the absurd came about as a reaction of the Second World War. The
existential philosophy was taken as its root and was combined with dramatic
elements to create a style of theatre which presented a world which could not be
logically explained.
This genre of theatre took quite some time to catch on because its playwriting
techniques seemed to be illogical to the theatre world. The scenary was often
unrecognizable and making matters worse, the dialogue never drew any sense.
The Theatre of the Absurd is a phrase used in reference to particular plays
written by number of primarily European playwrights in the late 1940s, 1950s, and
1960s, as well as to the style of theatre which has evolved form their work.
However, this genre of theatre accomplished its eventual popularity when World
War II highlighted the ultimate precariousness of human life.
13. Works Cited
Shmoop Editorial Team. "Waiting for Godot Theme of Friendship."
Shmoop.com. 11 Nov. 2008. Shmoop University, Inc. 24 Mar. 2014
<http://www.shmoop.com/waiting-for-godot/friendship-theme.html>.
"Waiting for Godot Summary and Analysis." Waiting for Godot Study Guide :
Analysis of the Play. 24 Mar. 2014 <http://www.gradesaver.com/waiting-for-
godot/study-guide/section3/>.
"Waiting for Godot Script." Waiting for Godot Script. 24 Mar. 2014
<http://samuel-beckett.net/Waiting_for_Godot_Part1.html>.