The document discusses best practices for measuring the effectiveness of social media strategies. It recommends measuring engagement rather than superficial metrics like likes and followers. Engagement metrics provide more meaningful insights and include the number of active community members, comments, shares, clicks and conversations generated. The document also cautions against common mistakes like focusing on metrics that don't correlate to business goals and failing to account for fake or inactive social media accounts when evaluating the size of an audience.
Complete and integrated global offering. We work in a unified way across London, New York, Boston, Atlanta, San Francisco, Edinburgh, Costa Rica, Paris, Copenhagen, Stockholm, Oslo, Milan, Amsterdam, Cologne, Berlin, Madrid, Germany, UAE, Sydney, Beijing, Singapore, Mumbai and more ....
Plus more recently, Guld Knicklan and DDDA for our work with Volvo’s All New XC90
This is what makes the our team special.Our global data science team is the largest of its kind among agencies. It exists for one simple reason, to drive transformation for clients through data-inspired innovation.
More than 8,000 marketing campaigns optimized each year
And we’re not the only one’s who like our work
We have extensive experience and developed partnerships with key social media data providers including Facebook, Twitter and Google.
As well as working closely with the worlds largest Social Media channels and search engines, we work with some of the worlds leading data providers to create bespoke proprietary tools.
Social media should be held accountable and be measurable in comparison to other digital and traditional marketing efforts.
In order to be taken seriously, it has to be.
Social media is just another means of communicating with your audience. It needs to be compared to the other marketing channels that you communicate with your audience.
Ask the question – Did anyone watch this years Superbowl? It seems like every presentation about social media that exists at the moment mentions the Superbowl in some way, and this is going to be no exception.
This is pretty much the last play of the game.
The team in blue (The Seattle Seahawks) have to get the ball into the End Zone (the big blue bit at the end).
The sensible way to do this, would be to try and run the ball over the line, and win the game.
This is what happened CLICK
For those of you than cant follow, The Patriots (in white) “intercepted” the ball and stopped Seattle from winning.
The Seahwaks lost because they made a bad decision at a crucial moment.
A lot of what we do as marketers comes down to making decisions. And making sure those decisions are the right ones to make
Where should I put my media budget to get the most band for my buck?
Which piece of creative should I use?
Which agency should I choose?
The aim in almost every case (whether in the long run, or short run) is, how can we make the most money? How can I demonstrate the strongest possible return on investment?
Lets do the maths.
That few seconds cost Seattle an extra $2.5 million, which is a lot of money (although not as much as I was expecting when I wrote this deck).
Now, whilst I am not in the habit of putting down other people’s work, here is one of the more forgettable ads that was screened during the Superbowl
CLICK
How much do we think this cost?
Audience estimated at 108.4 million – about 47% will see the ad 50.9 million impressions
$88.4 CPM
82.76 euro CPM
Number of other factors to consider:
Saturation – a lot of ads
Viewer attention – toilet breaks
Real number is likely to be higher.
But this kind of advertising is becoming less and less the focus of advertising during large events such as the Superbowl
I want everyone to remember this example
Yes – the famous “dunk in the dark” Oreo post.
Do we think this post represents good value for money?
Well, it was certainly impressive by Social media advertising standards, racking up around 13,000 shares on the day, plus a couple more since –
However, not so impressive if we compare it to the 16,000 Retweets Justin Bieber got for a normal Tweet on the same day,
nor the 108.4 million people who watched the TV commercials… (despite the agencies claim of 525,000,000 earned media impressions – we’ll come onto this later on)
First a bit of disclosure – Mark Ritson is a brilliant professor based in Australia – he did a brilliant video which is on YouTube which I have borrowed some theories from, he’s a very smart man and talks a lot of sense, please go and check it out.
The mathematically gifted of you may have worked this out already,
First of all, this isn’t an equal comparison, moving living, noisy advertisement vs. a Tweet on a screen that might flash by your newsfeed for a few seconds
Even a rather dull (in my opinion) Hyundai advertisement generated 16 times more impressions than this “best ever” Tweet – it blows It away in terms of absolute numbers
But it all comes down to how much it cost.
Standard measure for impressions is CPM – Cost per 1000 impressions.
RTm can be an expensive business. It involves a lot of people sitting around looking important.
This means that the CPM for Oreo’s tweet is 7 x higher!!! Than a Superbowl advertisement!
Right now you should all be thinking this?
AMAZING right? You can be 7 times more effective on social media than by buying a Superbowl advertisement.
Well, it’s worth remembering that this particular example, is probably the most successful RTM example of all time… (there were a few this year too, but none that generated the same resonance/interest as this one)
So we remember this example? Lets interrogate it a little more…
This was a “not terrible” example of RTM from this years Superbowl
Not a dissimilar product/brand
Running RTM
Similar content.
Much lower interaction
Much lower estimated reach – using the same methodology as earlier on maximum potential impressions on this one piece were 461,418 – if everyone saw the content
Once we add in how many people realistically saw the content
Lets assume that agencies have got more efficient in producing RTM- we can reduce the cost of running RTM over a Superbowl
Divided by impressions… anyone want to work it out?
428 euros!!!
That’s 5 times more expensive in terms of CPM than our Hyundai advertisement – and for what a quick flash on someone’s Twitter feed.
And most RTM examples aren’t even this good!
Yes – the famous “dunk in the dark” Oreo post.
Do we think this post represents good value for money?
So we remember this example? Lets interrogate it a little more…
This was a “not terrible” example of RTM from this years Superbowl
Not a dissimilar product/brand
Running RTM
Similar content.
Much lower interaction
Much lower estimated reach – using the same methodology as earlier on maximum potential impressions on this one piece were 461,418 – if everyone saw the content
Once we add in how many people realistically saw the content
Jonas
Issues around tracking ROI for social, again, are the same that pretty much every area of digital faces
DigitasLBi employs a custom proprietary methodology using 7 different attribution models
First Touch
Last Touch
First Click
Last Click
Linear
Time Decay
Markov
Social media should be held accountable and be measurable in comparison to other digital and traditional marketing efforts.
In order to be taken seriously, it has to be.
Old fashioned approach to content creation - start with an asset, positioning it and waiting for a response - we take the guesswork and assumption out of the process.
Out of the delegates here, can I see an honest show of hands in terms of who works like this?
A lot, if not the vasy majority do.
Data can however help inform the creative process - we call it the conversation back approach
Making use of our social listening tools and data partnerships, we start by listening and analysing conversations and in what contexts these conversations occur, which then informs our creative briefs.
This approach delivers consistently strong customer-centric, concepts.
I’m going to talk a bit about this later on, but maybe with the exception of a few people in this room, nobody is on social media to communicate with brands – they might do it out of ease, or to solve a problem, but generally they dont – there is all kinds of research out there that backs this up - I think about 20% of people use SM to communicate with brands.
I’m going to talk a bit about this later on, but maybe with the exception of a few people in this room, nobody is on social media to communicate with brands – they might do it out of ease, or to solve a problem, but generally they dont – there is all kinds of research out there that backs this up - I think about 20% of people use SM to communicate with brands.
Lets look at the top 10 reasons people use social networks <run through them>
Now lets look at the top 10 most followed accounts on Twitter – not many brands in there
Anyone like to take a guess at the most followed brand on Twitter (not news, celebrity or sports)?
Relationships
Accomplishments
Passions
People are on social media to express themselves – to create this “personal brand” that I am sure you will have heard of before. Not to communicate with your brand, unless that content/brand speaks to what they are and what they are interested in.
Data can however help inform the creative process - we call it the conversation back approach
Making use of our social listening tools and data partnerships, we start by listening and analysing conversations and in what contexts these conversations occur, which then informs our creative briefs.
This approach delivers consistently strong customer-centric, concepts.
An example of this… Meet Jordan
He is a Young male student based in the southern US.
He likes Fashion and Cheerleading… it says in his profile and everything.
Whilst undertaking our daily social listening, we uncovered the following Tweet
*Zoom in*
Jordan was mid purchase consideration, trying to pick between the Volvo s60 and the Mercedes CLA.
A tricky choice indeed.
This is a prime example of an opportunity for engagement and progression through the purchase funnel.
As a brand we may be able to join this conversation an influence his decision, but doing so without being too salesy is hard.
Along with the interests I mentioned on the previous slide,
There’s something else about Jordan’s profile you might notice…. He’s a bit of a Rhianna fan.
And by bit… I mean a HUGE Rihanna fan
It’s all well and good knowing this,
but we still needed to craft a response
We took a part of Rihanna’s hit single ”Stay” and tweaked it to be a bit more Volvo
Creating a very targeted response to Jordan.
Something that was made around him
His response didn’t take long, which was very nice….
And even better than that, a few days later….
Probably the single most difficult question that we as marketers can ask when it comes to our clients.
There are literally 100’s if not 1000’s of different metrics and combinations of metrics that
We employ and objectives orientated approach to social media metrics and analytics - making sure we drive tangible business results.
Brands are far too focused on the number of followers and likes that their pages have.
Its easy to see why. I have more followers than you, therefore my brand is more popular and therefore better than yours. More is better.
But then I would say that, I only have 700 odd followers.
Here’s why this whole argument is a bit crazy.
Your social media community is a certain size.
However your active community is only a smaller % of that – probably (as we talked about earlier) only 5-10% If that. This is more commonly known as Organic reach
These two areas are only a % of your total customers – this will vary depending on your brand
This community is only a % of your potential customers
Just increasing the size of your community isn’t necessarily going to help the other areas – to reach those, the most effective way is to position your content in front of them- either through paid media or sharing (earned media).
That’s more than the population of Russia in fake accounts - p
There are loads of things on social media we can measure other than “likes”, followers or even the mythical “Buzz”
SMART- Specific, measurable, achievable, relevant, timely
Consumer path to purchase
There are loads of things on social media we can measure other than “likes”, followers or even the mythical “Buzz”
SMART- Specific, measurable, achievable, relevant, timely
Consumer path to purchase
SMART- Specific, measurable, achievable, relevant, timely
Consumer path to purchase
Social media should be held accountable and be measurable in comparison to other digital and traditional marketing efforts.
In order to be taken seriously, it has to be.