Presentation to our research paper "IS Success Awareness in Community-Oriented Design Science Research" held at DESRIST 2015, May 21, 2015 in Dublin, Ireland.
IS Success Awareness in Community-Oriented Design Science Research
1. Lehrstuhl Informatik 5
(Information Systems)
Prof. Dr. M. Jarke
I5-DR-1505-1 This work by Dominik Renzel is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.
IS Success Awareness in
Community-Oriented Design Science Research
Dominik Renzel, Ralf Klamma, Matthias Jarke
Advanced Community Information Systems (ACIS) Group
Chair of Computer Science 5 (Databases & Information Systems)
RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany
renzel@dbis.rwth-aachen.de
DESRIST 2015
May 21, 2015
Clontarf Castle, Dublin, Ireland
2. Lehrstuhl Informatik 5
(Information Systems)
Prof. Dr. M. Jarke
I5-DR-1505-2
Design Science Research meets
Community of Practice
Design Science Research
(Hevner et al., 2004)
Community-Oriented
Design Science Research
“Learn how to do better“ as innovation driver;
requires self-reflection & success awareness
Design + evaluation of IT artifacts;
emphasizes relevance, innovation & rigor
Community of Practice
(Wenger, 1998)
3. Lehrstuhl Informatik 5
(Information Systems)
Prof. Dr. M. Jarke
I5-DR-1505-3
Long-Tail Communities of Practice
Community of Practice
(Wenger, 1998)
Joint enterprise, mutual engagement,
shared repertoire, informal structures,
permeable boundaries
Goal: “learn how to do better“
Agency with IT artifact ensembles
(cf. Sein et al., 2011) CIS
Long-Tail
(Anderson, 2004)
Specialized, dynamic, heterogeneous
Digital/ecological niche
Innovation driver!
organized in
4. Lehrstuhl Informatik 5
(Information Systems)
Prof. Dr. M. Jarke
I5-DR-1505-4
CIS Success Awareness in
Community-Oriented DSR
Central: context-specific CIS success model(s)
Context: CIS, community, stakeholder, time/version
CIS success models guide design & practice
Ongoing practical CIS evaluation drives CIS success modeling
CISSuccess
Model
CISSuccess
Model
CISSuccess
Model
5. Lehrstuhl Informatik 5
(Information Systems)
Prof. Dr. M. Jarke
I5-DR-1505-5
CISSuccess
Criterion Measure
OCS
CIS Success Modeling
1. Think community!
2. Avoid obtrusiveness!
3. Balance parsimony & completeness (Burton-Jones
et al., 2006)
4. Prefer established instruments (Gable et al., 2008)
5. Prefer formal validation
Foundation: IS-Impact Model (Gable et al., 2006)
Multi-dimensional formative index construction
(Diamantopoulos & Winklhofer, 2001; Petter et al., 2007)
A-priori models: community experts & requirements
Data sources:
– Automatically collected & enriched usage data
– Online micro-surveys (incl. criterion measure)
Validation: multiple regression & expert panels
6. Lehrstuhl Informatik 5
(Information Systems)
Prof. Dr. M. Jarke
I5-DR-1505-6
Case Study – Design & Evaluation of
Aphasia Patient Chat Tool
Community
– 200 aphasia patients distributed across Germany
– Inter-disciplinary therapist/researcher team
CIS (meta-)artifacts:
– SOCRATES (chat tool incl. dictionary-based word completion)
– Design goal: therapy tool to train & lost skills; to mitigate social isolation
– SOCRATES CIS success model
– Evaluation goal: awareness of most relevant SOCRATES success factors
Data sources:
– Usage data: rich low-level chat protocol logs (XMPP)
– Survey response: tailored to aphasia patients‘ short attention span
7. Lehrstuhl Informatik 5
(Information Systems)
Prof. Dr. M. Jarke
I5-DR-1505-7
Case Study Findings
Standard chat UIs cause pathological lock-states
– Visible from usage data-based a-priori CIS success metric
– Initiated UI simplification as design improvement
Immediate word completion causes typing pauses
– Detected drop in usage data-based CIS success metric
– Introduction of 5-second delay as design improvement
Word completion: training help, not augmentation
– Detected from usage data (action after word completion list)
– Exaptation case; no intervention necessary however
Usage data-driven metrics allow real-time awareness
Presence of CIS success model influences design
8. Lehrstuhl Informatik 5
(Information Systems)
Prof. Dr. M. Jarke
I5-DR-1505-8
Influence of Design on
Success Model
Reduced feature set reduction in candidate CIS success metrics
Design influences CIS success model (here: simplification)
9. Lehrstuhl Informatik 5
(Information Systems)
Prof. Dr. M. Jarke
I5-DR-1505-9
SOCRATES CIS Success Model –
Final Version Patients
N=|Patients|
N=|Patients|
N=|Patients|
N=6
N=6
N=6
Usage data-based metric Survey data-based metric
SOCRATES success model constructed from usage & survey
data with strong internal validity
10. Lehrstuhl Informatik 5
(Information Systems)
Prof. Dr. M. Jarke
I5-DR-1505-10
Conclusions & Future Work
Productive meeting of Community of Practice theory with
Design Science Research
– Communities of Practice offer rich IT artifact innovation contexts
– Communities of Practice lack IT artifact design & evaluation
methods
Aphasia case study demonstrates CIS success awareness
Future work: addressing the Long-Tail with IT meta-artifacts
– Requirements Bazaar
– CIS Success Awareness Platform
Editor's Notes
One of our reviewers called our research area „an important research area which can be considered as part of the long-tail of IS research streams.”
Possibly animation: start with arrow cycle, then add CIS success in the middle, then afterwards add dimensions
Think community: research in the full interest of your community; all research data was mainly produced by the community and thus belongs to the community as part of its shared repertoire; researcher gains credability and membership with sharing results in ongoing basis. The identification of success factors should be driven by CoP goals. Concrete measures should be actionable.
Avoid obtrusiveness: Observe where possible, survey only if inevitable; ongoing evaluation should not interfere excessively with actual community practice.
Gable et al. 2006: IS Impact Model + understanding of IS success as multi-dimensional formative index. We agree with Gable.
Idee: markiere
Aphasia community perfectly suited extreme case for our cause!