SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 6
Download to read offline
Gravitational and Space Biology 22(2) September 2009 33
NEUROLOGICAL EFFECTS OF SPACE RADIATION
Gregory A. Nelson, Ph.D.
Loma Linda University, Loma Linda, CA
ABSTRACT
In this brief review, several aspects of radiation effects on the
central nervous system are considered. Low to moderate levels
(~ 1 to 2 Gy) of charged particle radiation exposure will
characterize the environment experienced by astronauts on long-
term space missions. These doses are well below those
associated with gross pathological changes and tissue
breakdown; however, they may cause persistent functional
changes. The intrinsic membrane properties of mature neurons
appear be stable to space-like radiation exposures but their
connectivity and information processing properties are
persistently altered. These alterations result in altered
excitability with reductions in synaptic remodeling for many
months post irradiation. Changes in information processing due
to synaptic changes as well as depletion of neural precursor cells
may in turn lead to reduced cognitive abilities. Supporting this
idea, behavioral studies on irradiated rodents and human
children have shown that performance decrements do occur in
the space operations dose range. An analysis of charged particle
track interactions with neuron structure suggests that nearly
every nerve cell’s dendritic or axonal arborizations will be
traversed by multiple cosmic rays during a long duration space
mission. The functional changes observed experimentally are
associated with the complex arborizations of nerve cells and
their structural specializations. Although the data for charged
particle radiation exposures are sparse, the available
observations from all exposure regimens point to a credible risk
of cognitive or performance decrements during long term space
missions.
KEYWORDS
Central nervous system, hippocampus, neurogenesis,
space radiation, synapse.
INTRODUCTION
The effects of radiation on the central nervous system
(CNS) have been investigated for many years, but
primarily in the context of radiotherapy. In this context,
survival of cells is the key indicator as the emphasis is on
tumor control, while minimizing side effects to normal
tissue. Most of these studies have employed gamma rays
or X-rays and typically, high doses (> 20 Gy) are applied
to local areas. This results in steep dose response curves
for white matter degeneration in either cortex
(leukencephalopathy) or the spinal cord (myelopathy)
which appears after a substantial time lag of many months
(Debus et al., 2003). This may be accompanied by
edema, breakdown of the blood-brain barrier, swelling of
vessels (telangiaectasia), inflammatory reactions and
sometimes necrosis. In this literature, there has been an
active debate about whether vascular endothelial cells or
parenchymal cells (especially oligodendrocytes) are the
dose limiting cells of the tissue which is characterized
overall by low rates of cell division and replacement.
Three excellent reviews of this literature are: Wong and
Van der Kogel, 2004; Tofilon and Fike, 2000; Schultheiss
et al.,1995. Many of the mainstream opinions about CNS
radiation responses are derived from results that result
from high dose exposures. These may not extrapolate
well to effects of the space environment in which the
relevant exposures are in the dose range of < 2 Gy
delivered slowly to the whole body by mixed fields of
charged particles. In this exposure regime there is much
less known, and NASA’s interest is in establishing
whether: 1) there are acute risks that could lead to mission
compromising performance impairments, and 2) whether
the severity and onset of neurodegenerative conditions
later in life may be enhanced or accelerated. The
following presentation will consider some selected studies
that address this lower dose regime, with emphasis on
charged particle effects if known.
Charged Particle Radiation
The unique properties of charged particles are associated
with their track structure. Unlike X-rays and gamma rays
which are absorbed in an exponential fashion with depth
in tissue, charged particles have a defined range and
deposit their energy at an increasing rate until they reach
the end of their range. This rate of energy loss is termed
the linear energy transfer or LET and is commonly used
as a measure of the quality of the radiation or its
ionization density. Charged particle interactions with
electrons in the target material are primarily electrostatic
rather than through processes such as Compton scattering.
Because the particles have significant mass, they travel in
relatively straight lines and about half of the energy they
deposit is confined to a narrow cylinder (track core) about
20 nm in diameter along the track. The other half of their
energy is deposited through radially scattered electrons
around the track core. These properties tend to
concentrate damage along the track rather than in the
more diffuse damage patterns produced by X-ray and
gamma ray exposures. Unique DNA damage,
genotoxicity and tissue responses have been described for
such densely ionizing radiation and many of these
properties have been reviewed in volume 16 of this
Bulletin (Nelson, 2003).
Cellular Level Responses
The first level of biological organization to explore is the
neuron with its excitable membrane that is the basic
____________________
* Correspondence to: Gregory A. Nelson
Radiobiology Program
Loma Linda University
Loma Linda, CA 92354
Email: gnelson@dominion.llumc.edu
Phone: 909-558-8364; Fax: 909-558-0825
G.A. Nelson — Neurological Effects of Space Radiation
34 Gravitational and Space Biology 22(2) September 2009
functional unit of the nervous system. It might be
expected that radiation-induced lipid peroxidation
reactions would compromise neuronal electrochemical
gradients, membrane receptors and ion channels
Extensive studies of membrane fluidity, cell leakage and
activities of Na+
/K+
ATPases and acetylcholinsterases
show that only doses in excess of 100 Gy are significantly
deleterious, although lipid chain shortening is observed at
lower dose (Benderitter et al., 2003; Krokosz and
Szweda-Lewandowska,2005). However, isolated rat
synaptosomes show decreased 22
Na+
uptake after 1 Gy of
gamma rays (Mullin et al., 1986) and some tissue culture
cells exhibit alterations in Ca2+
transport after 1-4 Gy of
electrons (Todd and Mikkelsen, 1994) suggesting
sensitivity of ion channels. Direct measurements of
charged particle-induced lipid peroxidation of liposomes
shows that they are much less effective than X-rays
(Ziegler & Wessels, 1998).
In early studies, the conduction velocities of compound
action potentials along isolated frog and rabbit sciatic
nerves was found to be very resistant to radiation,
requiring in excess of 500 Gy to show conduction block
(Gerstner et al., 1955). Recent studies using patch clamp
recordings from mouse hippocampal slices indicate that
intrinsic membrane properties of pyramidal neurons are
resistant to change after 1-4 Gy of iron ions or 1-8 Gy of
protons (NSCOR, unpublished). Together these results
emphasize the stability of nerve functional properties to
radiation exposure. By contrast, the survival of cultured
NT2 human neural precursor cells is quite sensitive to
charged particles and shows significant LET-dependent
apoptosis and necrotic death at doses < 0.5 Gy (Guida et
al. 2005). Growth of new processes (neuritogenesis)
from neurons in chick retinal explants is also sensitive to
iron ions at doses below 0.5 Gy (Vazquez et al., 1994).
So, survival, growth and different-tiation properties of
neurons are radio-sensitive in the space radiation dose
range while the functional integrity of fully differentiated
neurons appears to be relatively stable.
Electrical Output of Nerve Ensembles
The primary function of systems of nerves is to generate
output signals in response to input from other neurons and
environmental cues. Early experiments using implanted
microelectrodes in rabbits measured spontaneous
electrical activity from a number of brain locations
including hippocampus, thalamus and cortex. Significant
decreases in the frequency and amplitude of spikes were
observed in most brain regions after 4 – 5 Gy at times up
to 6 hr, but the hippocampus exhibited hyperexcitability
along with changes in spike train organization that may be
associated with inhibitory neuron malfunction (Monnier
and Krupp, 1962). At higher doses (9 Gy) all activity was
suppressed. Visually-evoked potentials in mice irradiated
with 20 MeV deuterons exhibited spike amplitude and
firing pattern modifications after 5 Gy (Ordy et al., 1968)
and the pedal-pleural ganglion of the sea slug Aplysia
exhibited increased excitability after 10 Gy of 137
Cs
gamma rays (Clatworthy et al., 1999). Pellmar and
collaborators performed recordings on Guinea Pig
hippocampal slices during or shortly after irradiation and
demonstrated increases in synaptic efficacy (dendritic
response) while population spikes (somatic response)
were inhibited at gamma ray doses above 30 Gy (Pellmar
et al., 1990; 1993). All of the above observations
demonstrate that changes in output may occur within
hours after > 4 Gy of low LET radiation but do not
address late changes or responses to high LET radiation.
Recent field recording experiments conducted by
Vlkolinsky et al. (2007) under NASA funding (NSCOR,
unpublished) examined mouse hippocampal slices
isolated from 1 to 18 months following 0 to 4 Gy of
accelerated iron ions or protons. These demonstrated that
synaptic efficacy was increased long after irradiation and
led to hyperexcitability. However, in the simple long
term potentiation (LTP) model of memory, synaptic
remodeling between pyramidal neurons was inhibited
months after 1-2 Gy of iron ions. LTP is correlated with
hippocampus functions in spatial memory and learning
using behavioral measures. These electrophysiological
paradigms report alterations in the number and strength of
synapses as well as glutamate receptor function and are
mostly post-synaptic in their anatomical distribution.
Observations on the important neural adhesion molecule
NCAM, which regulates synaptic plasticity, show that it is
down-regulated after doses of 2.5 Gy of 1 GeV/n iron
ions in rats (Casadesus et al., 2005) and > 0.5 Gy of iron
ions in mice (NSCOR, unpublished). These observations
suggest that the output of systems of neurons (and their
associated glia) is altered after irradiation at the level of
connectivity between cells in the networks. Further, these
systems are vulnerable to charged particle doses of the
same order as predicted for long term space missions and
exhibit defects in information processing that underlies all
CNS functions. The observed hyperexcitability may also
indicate an enhanced susceptibility to seizures.
Neural Precursor Cells
The most radiosensitive cells of the CNS are neural
precursor cells (NPC). These astrocyte-like stem cells
located in the linings of the ventricles and in the
subgranular layer of the hippocampus continue to divide
throughout life in mammals. They differentiate into
astrocytes, oligodendrocytes and neurons which become
incorporated into neuronal circuits and contribute to
learning and memory. J.R. Fike and others have
demonstrated that X-ray doses of 2-5 Gy cause substantial
apoptosis of NPCs and continued reduction in the
production of immature neurons (Mizamatsu et al., 2003;
Rola et al., 2004). Lower doses of ~1 Gy iron ions result
in similar elimination of NPCs (NSCOR, unpublished).
Further, irradiation causes remodeling of the CNS
microenvironment resulting in a state that inhibits
differentiation of resident NPC descendents (or grafted
unirradiated NPCs) and the continued elevated production
of reactive oxygen species (Monje et al., 2002; Limoli et
al., 2007) and chronic activation of microglia (Rola et al.,
2004). Iron ions are much more effective than 250 MeV
G.A. Nelson — Neurological Effects of Space Radiation
Gravitational and Space Biology 22(2) September 2009 35
protons or X-rays (NSCOR, unpublished). The loss of
NPC regenerative capacity may lead to accelerated
learning and memory decline with age.
Behavioral and Cognitive Effects
Electrophysiological and neurogenesis experiments are
consistent with behavioral observations on rats and mice
irradiated with charged particles. Morris water maze and
Barnes maze experiments indicate that spatial memory
and learning are inhibited by doses as low as 0.1 Gy of
iron ions (Shukitt-Hale et al., 2000; Raber et al., 2004).
These behaviors are believed to be largely associated with
the hippocampus. Conditioned taste aversion to
amphetamine (but not lithium) in rats is inhibited at doses
of >0.1 – 0.8 Gy iron ions in rats implicating dopamine
pathways. Ascending scale operant conditioning studies
(food reward after lever pressing) also indicate that, in
rodents, cognitive abilities may be susceptible to low
doses of charged particles (2 Gy iron ions) (Rabin et al.,
2004).
But are humans susceptible to radiation in the low dose
regime? Adult radiotherapy patients treated for head,
neck and brain tumors have commonly reported
depression, confusion and lethargy; but these are
individuals receiving high localized doses and who have
underlying medical conditions. There are, however,
observations on human children that have shown
sensitivity of still-developing nervous systems to low
LET radiation. In Israel, a large cohort of children
(~20,000 of average age 7 years) were treated with a
mean dose of 1.3 Gy X-rays to cause depilation of the
scalp in order to facilitate treatment of tinea capitis fungal
infections. These children later showed poorer outcomes
in high school aptitude and IQ performance and more
frequent psychiatric disturbances in later life. (Ron et al.,
1982). A group of 6-18 month-old Swedish children
treated for cutaneous hemangioma (strawberry
birthmarks) on the head were followed-up at the time of
comprehensive testing prior to military enlistment (age 18
– 19 years). They showed cognitive impairments at doses
above 0.1 Gy and up to 32% decreases in high school
attendance (corrected for social influences) after frontal
lobe X-ray doses > 0.25 Gy (Hall et al., 2004). So,
human CNS tissue that is still undergoing growth and
differentiation is susceptible to space-like doses of low
LET radiation. Together with animal behavioral studies
this suggests that low doses of charged particles may be
of concern in adults, especially with respect to brain
regions or processes dependent on continued
neurogenesis.
Fluence-Based Assessment of the Cellular Target
In estimating risks from fields of charged particles,
especially at low doses, it has been useful to consider the
fluence of particles rather than the dose The planar
fluence is the number of particles that traverse a unit area
and dose is proportional to fluence and LET. In this way
the contributions from different particles expressed as the
probability of exhibiting an endpoint (such as mutation or
cell death) per particle type can be summed to estimate
the total probability. Using this strategy, Curtis et al.
have estimated the number of traversals of cell nuclei or
soma in different CNS structures for a reference 3-year
Mars mission (Curtis et al., 1998). They showed that
approximately 46% of cell somas (areas from 180 – 486
µm2
) and 7.6% of cell nuclei (areas 40 – 100 µm2
) in
human hippocampal cells would be traversed by at least
one particle of atomic number Z ≥ 15. By extension,
16,000 cells in the retinal macula, 2x107
cells of the
hippocampus, and 850,000 cells of the thalamus would be
“hit” by such heavy ions. These calculations were
motivated by cell survival as the significant endpoint but
experiments suggest that fully differentiated cells are
radioresistant for survival. Extensive modeling of
network failure modes in the hippocampus have shown
that a very high proportion of cells in the hilar region
must be lost before there are significant changes in
connectivity (Dyhrfjeld-Johnsen et al., 2007). This
suggests that minor cell loss would not lead to major
functional changes. The situation may be different for
radiosensitive NPCs, however. If they are preferentially
incorporated into new memories, then lower fractions of
cell loss may be significant.
From the discussion above on functional output, it can be
argued that dendritic and axonal arborizations may be the
more relevant cellular targets, so a re-examination of the
impact of fluence is in order. Neuroanatomical studies
have characterized the number and topology of neuronal
processes; from these studies, the properties of
hippocampal CA1 (subfield cornu ammonis 1) pyramidal
neurons are summarized below for the rat (Pyapali et al.,
1998; The Hippocampus Book, 2007):
• Cell soma diameter: 15 µm with cross sectional
area = 193 µm2
• Total dendritic length per cell: 1.2 – 1.3 cm at
1.0 to 2.5 µm diameter.
• Total axon length per cell: ~ 0.2 cm and diameter
< 1 µm.
• Total dendritic spines per cell: ~30,000.
• Total spine synapses per cell: 10,000 – 30,000
(of which only 16-26 need to fire
synchronously to generate action potentials).
From these dimensions and three dimensional
reconstructions of cells it was possible to calculate the
cross sectional area of a typical pyramidal cell at 11,800
+/- 3,200 µm2
(N=11) and the number density of
synapses at between 1 and 2 per µm3
. Using these areas
and the estimated Mars mission fluences from Curtis et al.
(1998), Poisson distribution calculations yield the
following. At solar minimum, with a fluence for Z ≥ 15
ions of 107,000/cm2
, each cell body would be traversed,
on average, by 0.21 particles (1 out of 5 cells) whereas
each arbor area would be traversed by 12.8 particles (a
128-fold greater value). At solar maximum, with a Z ≥ 15
fluence of 59,300/cm2
, the values are 0.14 hits per soma
and 7.1 hits per arbor (a 71-fold greater value). Thus,
essentially every cell will be traversed multiple times and
G.A. Nelson — Neurological Effects of Space Radiation
36 Gravitational and Space Biology 22(2) September 2009
the high interconnectivity of neurons is likely to spread
the influence of each traversal to many cells.
Another estimate can be made from the track structure of
the particles. Chatterjee and collaborators (Chatterjee and
Schaefer, 1976) employed a model for particle tracks that
describes the local dose as a function of radial distance
from the track axis. Applying their model to 600 MeV/n
iron ions or 250 MeV/n protons (which are relevant
energies for accelerator experiments, cosmic rays and
solar particle events) one may estimate that cylindrical
regions within 4.5 µm of an iron ion track axis will
receive ≥ 1 cGy dose and regions within 2 µm will receive
at least 5 cGy. For protons the corresponding radial
distances are 0.32 and 0.05 µm. At 2 synapses per µm3
this means that for iron ions, 25,132 synapses per
millimeter track length receive ≥ 5 cGy dose and
127,235/mm receive ≥ 1 cGy. For protons the values are
16/mm and 643/mm, respectively. If only 16-26 synapses
must be activated to initiate an action potential (The
Hippocampus Book, 2007), and if 5 cGy has a 10%
chance of activating a synapse, then for each millimeter of
iron track length, approximately 2500 synapses could be
activated and could, in turn, result in 100 action potentials
in interconnected neurons participating in the same
pathway or local circuit. Sufficient activation might
mimic the effects of high frequency (tetanic) stimulation
to neuron ensembles leading to persistent changes in their
synaptic strengths and efficacies. Perhaps the light
flashes perceived by astronauts during to the passage of
charged particles through their retinas reflect such
activation processes.
SUMMARY
In this brief review, several aspects of radiation effects on
the central nervous system were considered. It was
shown that although major necrotic and demyelinating
changes are not expected from exposures to space
radiation, there may still be enduring functional
consequences. While the excitability properties of mature
neurons are expected to be stable, their connectivity and
information processing properties may be persistently
altered. These alterations result in hyperexcitability,
perhaps with attendant seizure risks. Changes in
information processing due to synaptic changes and/or
depletion of newly-born neurons may also lead to reduced
cognitive abilities. Radiation-induced alterations in the
CNS microenvironment could stabilize an unfavorable
milieu for cell function and replacement possibly through
oxidative stress and inflammatory mechanisms.
Behavioral studies on young adult rodents exposed to
charged particles and observations of human children
exposed to photons have shown that performance
decrements can occur in the dose range associated with
space operations. Finally, a reconsideration of how
charged particle tracks interact with neuron structure
suggests that nearly every nerve cell’s dendritic or axonal
arborizations will be traversed by multiple cosmic rays
during a long duration space mission. Thus, earlier
estimates focusing on cell survival alone may
underestimate the potential for deleterious functional
changes.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The author wishes to thank the many co-investigators on
the NSCOR program project investigating the effects of
charged particles on the mouse hippocampus for
providing focus and perspective on the properties of the
central nervous system. Funding for this effort was
provided by NASA grant NNJ04HC90G.
REFERENCES
Benderitter, M., Vincent-Genod, L., Pouget, J.P. and P.
Voisin. 2003. The cell membrane as a biosensor of
oxidative stress induced by radiation exposure: a
multiparameter investigation. Radiation Research
159:471-483.
Casadesus, G., Shukitt-Hale, B., Stellwagen, H.M., Smith,
M.A., Rabin, B.M. and J.A. Joseph. 2005. Hippocampal
neurogenesis and PSA-NCAM expression following
exposure to 56
Fe particles mimics that seen during aging
in rats. Experimental Gerontology 40:249-254.
Chatterjee, A. and H. Schaefer. 1976. Microdosimetric
structure of heavy ion tracks in tissue. Radiation and
Environmental Biophysics. 13: 215-227.
Clatworthy, A.L., Noel, F., Grose, E., Cui, M. and P.J.
Tofilon. 1999. Ionizing radiation-induced alterations in
the electrophysiological properties of Aplysia sensory
neurons. Neuroscience Letters 268:45-48.
Curtis, S.E., Nealy, J.E. and J.W. Wilson. 1995. Risk
cross section and their application to risk estimation in the
galactic cosmic-ray environment. Radiation Research
141:57–65.
Curtis, S.B., Vazquez, M.E., Wilson, J.W., Atwell, W.,
Kim, M., and J. Capala. 1998. Cosmic Ray Hit
Frequencies in Critical Sites in the Central Nervous
System. Advance in Space Research 22:197-207.
Debus, J., Scholz, M., Haberer, T., Peschke, P., Jäkel, O.,
Karger, C.P., Wannenmacher, M. 2003. Radiation
tolerance of the rat spinal cord after single and split doses
of photons and carbon ions. Radiation Research 160:536-
542.
Dyhrfjeld-Johnsen, J., Santhakumar, V., Morgan, R.J.,
Huerta, R., Tsimring, L., and I. Soltesz. 2007.
Topological determinants of epileptogenesis in large-scale
structural and functional models of the dentate gyrus
derived from experimental data. Journal of
Neurophysiology. 97:1566-1587.
G.A. Nelson — Neurological Effects of Space Radiation
Gravitational and Space Biology 22(2) September 2009 37
Gerstner, H.B., Orth, J.S. and E.O. Richey. 1955. Effect
of high-intensity x-radiation on velocity of nerve
conduction. American Journal of Physiology 180:232-
236.
Guida, P., Vazquez, M.E. and S. Otto. 2005. Cytotoxic
effects of low- and high-LET radiation on human
neuronal progenitor cells: induction of apoptosis and
TP53 gene expression. Radiation Research 164:545-551.
Hall, P., Adami, H.O., Trichopoulos, D., Pedersen, N.L.,
Lagiou, P., Ekbom, A., Ingvar, M., Lundell, M. and F.
Granath. 2004. Effect of low doses of ionizing radiation
in infancy on cognitive function in adulthood: Swedish
population based cohort study. British Medical Journal
328:1-5.
Krokosz, A. And Z. Szweda-Lewandowska. 2005.
Changes in the activity of acetylcholinesterase and Na,K-
ATPase in human erythrocytes irradiated with X-rays.
Cell and Molecular Biology Letters 10:471-478.
Limoli, C.L., Giedzinski, E., Baure, J., Rola, R. And J.R.
Fike. 2007. Redox changes induced in hippocampal
precursor cells by heavy ion irradiation. Radiation and
Environmental Biophysics 46:167-172.
Mizumatsu, S., Monje, M.L., Morhardt, D.R., Rola, R.,
Palmer, T.D. and J.R. Fike. 2003. Extreme sensitivity of
adult neurogenesis to low doses of X-irradiation. Cancer
Research 63:4021-4027.
Monje, M.L., Mizumatsu, S., Fike, J.R. and T.D. Palmer.
2002. Irradiation induces neural precursor-cell
dysfunction. Nature Medicine 8:955-962.
Monnier, M. and P. Krupp, 1962. Action of gamma
radiation on electrical brain activity. In: Response of the
Nervous System to Ionizing Radiation. (Haley, T. and
Snider, R. Eds.) New York: Academic Press, pp. 607 –
619.
Mullin, M.J., Hunt, W.A. and R.A. Harris. 1986.
Ionizing radiation alters the properties of sodium channels
in rat brain synaptosomes. Journal of Neurochemistry
47:489-495.
Nelson, G.A. 2003. Fundamental space radiobiology.
Gravitational and Space Biology Bulletin. 16:29-36.
NSCOR. 2007. NASA Specialized Center of Research
program project (NASA grant NNJ04HC90G) led by
Loma Linda University with 5 collaborating insti-tutions.
The author, G. Nelson, is the project principal investigator
and unpublished observations reflect efforts of multiple
project co-investigators.
Ordy, J.M., Samorajski, T., Horrocks, L.A., Zeman, W.
and H.J. Curtis. 1968. Changes in memory,
electrophysiology, neurochemistry and neuronal
ultrastructure after deuteron irradiation of the brain in
C57B1-10 mice. Journal of Neurochemistry 15:1245-
1256.
Pellmar, T.C., Schauer, D.A. and G.H. Zeman. 1990.
Time- and dose-dependent changes in neuronal activity
produced by X radiation in brain slices. Radiation
Research 122:209-214.
Pellmar, T.C. and D.L. Lepinski. 1993. Gamma radiation
(5-10 Gy) impairs neuronal function in the guinea pig
hippocampus. Radiation Research 136:255-261.
Pyapali, G.K., Sik, A., Penttonen, M., Buzaki, G. and
D.A. Turner. 1998. Dendritic properties of hippocampal
CA1 pyramidal neurons in the rat: Intracellular staining in
vivo and in vitro. Journal of Comparative Neurology
391:335–352.
Raber, J., Rola, R., LeFevour, A., Morhardt, D., Curley,
J., Mizumatsu, S., VandenBerg, S.R. and J.R. Fike.
Radiation-induced cognitive impairments are associated
with changes in indicators of hippocampal neurogenesis.
Radiation Research 162:39-47.
Rabin, B.M., Joseph, J.A. and B. Shukitt-Hale. 2004.
Heavy particle irradiation, neurochemistry and behavior:
thresholds, dose-response curves and recovery of
function. Advances in Space Research 33:1330-1333.
Rola, R., Raber, J., Rizk, A., Otsuka, S., VandenBerg,
S.R., Morhardt, D.R. and J.R. Fike. 2004. Radiation-
induced impairment of hippocampal neurogenesis is
associated with cognitive deficits in young mice.
Experimental Neurology 188:316-30.
Ron, E., Modan, B., Floro, S., Harkedar, I. and R.
Gurewitz. 1982. Mental function following scalp
irradiation during childhood. American Journal of Epi-
demiology 116:149-60.
Schultheiss, T.E., Kun, L.E., Ang, K.K., and L.C.
Stephens. 1995. Radiation response of the central nervous
system. Internationl Journal of Radiation Oncology
Biology and Physics 31:1093 – 1112.
Shukitt-Hale, B., Casadesus, G., McEwen, J.J., Rabin,
B.M. and J.A. Joseph. 2000. Spatial learning and
memory deficits induced by exposure to iron-56-particle
radiation. Radiation Research 154:28-33.
The Hippocampus Book. 2007. (Andersen, P., Morris, R.,
Amaral, D., Bliss, T. O’Keefe, J., Eds.) Oxford: Oxford
University Press.
Todd, D.G. and R.B. Mikkelsen. 1994. Ionizing radiation
induces a transient increase in cytosolic free [Ca2+
] in
human epithelial tumor cells. Cancer Research 54:5224-
5230.
Tofilon, P.J. and J.R. Fike. 2000. The radioresponse of the
central nervous system: A dynamic process. Radiation
Research 153: 357 – 370.
G.A. Nelson — Neurological Effects of Space Radiation
38 Gravitational and Space Biology 22(2) September 2009
Vazquez, M.E. and E. Kirk. 2000. In vitro neurotoxic
effects of 1 GeV/n iron particles assessed in retinal
explants. Advances in Space Research 25: 2041-2049.
Vlkolinský, R., Krucker, T., Smith, A.L., Lamp, T.C.,
Nelson, G.A. and A. Obenaus. 2007. Effects of
lipopolysaccharide on 56
Fe-particle radiation-induced
impair-ment of synaptic plasticity in the mouse
hippocampus. Radiation Research 168:462-470.
Wong, C.S., and A.J. Van der Kogel. 2004. Mechanisms
of radiation injury to the central nervous system:
implications for neuroprotection. Molecular Interventions
4:273-284.
Ziegler, C. and J.M. Wessels. 1998. Investigation of lipid
peroxidation in liposomes induced by heavy ion
irradiation. Radiation and Environmental Biophysics
37:95-100.

More Related Content

What's hot

Effects Of Oxygen On Radiation Therapy
Effects Of  Oxygen On  Radiation  TherapyEffects Of  Oxygen On  Radiation  Therapy
Effects Of Oxygen On Radiation Therapy
fondas vakalis
 
Cereb. cortex 2009-knafo-586-92
Cereb. cortex 2009-knafo-586-92Cereb. cortex 2009-knafo-586-92
Cereb. cortex 2009-knafo-586-92
shiraknafo
 
Chap 5 fractionated radiation and the dose rate effect
Chap 5 fractionated radiation and the dose rate effectChap 5 fractionated radiation and the dose rate effect
Chap 5 fractionated radiation and the dose rate effect
Korea Cancer Center Hospital
 
Biophysical fields. color coronal spectral analysis.
Biophysical fields. color coronal spectral analysis.Biophysical fields. color coronal spectral analysis.
Biophysical fields. color coronal spectral analysis.
Alexander Decker
 
The law of bergonie and tribondeau
The law of bergonie and tribondeauThe law of bergonie and tribondeau
The law of bergonie and tribondeau
Gopi krishna Giri
 
Development and implementation of a novel interactome platform in studies on ...
Development and implementation of a novel interactome platform in studies on ...Development and implementation of a novel interactome platform in studies on ...
Development and implementation of a novel interactome platform in studies on ...
Ewelina Maliszewska-Cyna, PhD
 

What's hot (20)

RADIATION BIOLOGY
RADIATION BIOLOGYRADIATION BIOLOGY
RADIATION BIOLOGY
 
Ppt.cns radiobiology
Ppt.cns radiobiologyPpt.cns radiobiology
Ppt.cns radiobiology
 
Effects Of Oxygen On Radiation Therapy
Effects Of  Oxygen On  Radiation  TherapyEffects Of  Oxygen On  Radiation  Therapy
Effects Of Oxygen On Radiation Therapy
 
Cereb. cortex 2009-knafo-586-92
Cereb. cortex 2009-knafo-586-92Cereb. cortex 2009-knafo-586-92
Cereb. cortex 2009-knafo-586-92
 
EFFECTS OF ELECTRICITY ON CELL BIOLOGY, PHYSIOLOGY AND ON THIS BASIS INVESTIG...
EFFECTS OF ELECTRICITY ON CELL BIOLOGY, PHYSIOLOGY AND ON THIS BASIS INVESTIG...EFFECTS OF ELECTRICITY ON CELL BIOLOGY, PHYSIOLOGY AND ON THIS BASIS INVESTIG...
EFFECTS OF ELECTRICITY ON CELL BIOLOGY, PHYSIOLOGY AND ON THIS BASIS INVESTIG...
 
Spatially fractionated radiation therapy(grid therapy)
Spatially fractionated radiation therapy(grid therapy)Spatially fractionated radiation therapy(grid therapy)
Spatially fractionated radiation therapy(grid therapy)
 
Chap 5 fractionated radiation and the dose rate effect
Chap 5 fractionated radiation and the dose rate effectChap 5 fractionated radiation and the dose rate effect
Chap 5 fractionated radiation and the dose rate effect
 
Biophysical fields. color coronal spectral analysis.
Biophysical fields. color coronal spectral analysis.Biophysical fields. color coronal spectral analysis.
Biophysical fields. color coronal spectral analysis.
 
4 rs of radiobiology
4 rs of radiobiology4 rs of radiobiology
4 rs of radiobiology
 
Molecular Mechanisms of Radiation Damage.
Molecular Mechanisms of Radiation Damage. Molecular Mechanisms of Radiation Damage.
Molecular Mechanisms of Radiation Damage.
 
Crimson Publishers-More than Meets the Eye: Biological Clocks
 Crimson Publishers-More than Meets the Eye: Biological Clocks Crimson Publishers-More than Meets the Eye: Biological Clocks
Crimson Publishers-More than Meets the Eye: Biological Clocks
 
The law of bergonie and tribondeau
The law of bergonie and tribondeauThe law of bergonie and tribondeau
The law of bergonie and tribondeau
 
The Effect of Gamma Irradiation on the Radiofrequency Dielectric Dispersion P...
The Effect of Gamma Irradiation on the Radiofrequency Dielectric Dispersion P...The Effect of Gamma Irradiation on the Radiofrequency Dielectric Dispersion P...
The Effect of Gamma Irradiation on the Radiofrequency Dielectric Dispersion P...
 
Gene transfer by physical methods
Gene transfer by physical methodsGene transfer by physical methods
Gene transfer by physical methods
 
Cell survival curves
Cell survival curvesCell survival curves
Cell survival curves
 
Radiobiology
RadiobiologyRadiobiology
Radiobiology
 
Kenyatta university. hmb201 dna repairdocx
Kenyatta university. hmb201 dna repairdocxKenyatta university. hmb201 dna repairdocx
Kenyatta university. hmb201 dna repairdocx
 
4 r's of radiobiology and dose rate effects
4 r's of radiobiology and dose rate effects4 r's of radiobiology and dose rate effects
4 r's of radiobiology and dose rate effects
 
Development and implementation of a novel interactome platform in studies on ...
Development and implementation of a novel interactome platform in studies on ...Development and implementation of a novel interactome platform in studies on ...
Development and implementation of a novel interactome platform in studies on ...
 
Fractionated radiation and dose rate effect
Fractionated radiation and dose rate effectFractionated radiation and dose rate effect
Fractionated radiation and dose rate effect
 

Viewers also liked

GaneshaShetty_Automation_Testing_Resume-Final
GaneshaShetty_Automation_Testing_Resume-FinalGaneshaShetty_Automation_Testing_Resume-Final
GaneshaShetty_Automation_Testing_Resume-Final
Ganesha Shetty
 
Khushbu Testing Resume
Khushbu Testing ResumeKhushbu Testing Resume
Khushbu Testing Resume
Khushbu Kumari
 

Viewers also liked (9)

GaneshaShetty_Automation_Testing_Resume-Final
GaneshaShetty_Automation_Testing_Resume-FinalGaneshaShetty_Automation_Testing_Resume-Final
GaneshaShetty_Automation_Testing_Resume-Final
 
Le Facebook F8 décortiqué par Cossette
Le Facebook F8 décortiqué par CossetteLe Facebook F8 décortiqué par Cossette
Le Facebook F8 décortiqué par Cossette
 
Shape Signatures Light
Shape Signatures LightShape Signatures Light
Shape Signatures Light
 
Khushbu Testing Resume
Khushbu Testing ResumeKhushbu Testing Resume
Khushbu Testing Resume
 
Dkg management presentation usd 2008 update
Dkg management presentation usd 2008 updateDkg management presentation usd 2008 update
Dkg management presentation usd 2008 update
 
Creative Responses to Artificial Intelligence
Creative Responses to Artificial IntelligenceCreative Responses to Artificial Intelligence
Creative Responses to Artificial Intelligence
 
Les Français et l'Hôpital du Futur - Sondage OpinionWay pour le Groupe Conflu...
Les Français et l'Hôpital du Futur - Sondage OpinionWay pour le Groupe Conflu...Les Français et l'Hôpital du Futur - Sondage OpinionWay pour le Groupe Conflu...
Les Français et l'Hôpital du Futur - Sondage OpinionWay pour le Groupe Conflu...
 
Struktura neper te cilen duhet te kaloj pershkrimi i projektit ne ms word (1)
Struktura neper te cilen duhet te kaloj pershkrimi i projektit ne ms word (1)Struktura neper te cilen duhet te kaloj pershkrimi i projektit ne ms word (1)
Struktura neper te cilen duhet te kaloj pershkrimi i projektit ne ms word (1)
 
シリコンバレーから見るショッピング体験の変化
シリコンバレーから見るショッピング体験の変化シリコンバレーから見るショッピング体験の変化
シリコンバレーから見るショッピング体験の変化
 

Similar to Neurological Effects of Space Radiation

Biophysical fields. color coronal spectral analysis.
Biophysical fields. color coronal spectral analysis.Biophysical fields. color coronal spectral analysis.
Biophysical fields. color coronal spectral analysis.
Alexander Decker
 
Radiotherapy in gynaecology
Radiotherapy in gynaecologyRadiotherapy in gynaecology
Radiotherapy in gynaecology
drmcbansal
 
WarmLowdensityCoolHighdensityWarmPlati.docx
WarmLowdensityCoolHighdensityWarmPlati.docxWarmLowdensityCoolHighdensityWarmPlati.docx
WarmLowdensityCoolHighdensityWarmPlati.docx
melbruce90096
 
Biological effects of radiation
Biological effects of radiationBiological effects of radiation
Biological effects of radiation
DR.URVASHI NIKTE
 
Kimpo et al_JNsci 2003
Kimpo et al_JNsci 2003Kimpo et al_JNsci 2003
Kimpo et al_JNsci 2003
Rhea Kimpo
 
Andrew Goldsworthy to British Society for Ecological Medicine at the Royal Co...
Andrew Goldsworthy to British Society for Ecological Medicine at the Royal Co...Andrew Goldsworthy to British Society for Ecological Medicine at the Royal Co...
Andrew Goldsworthy to British Society for Ecological Medicine at the Royal Co...
Martin Sharp
 

Similar to Neurological Effects of Space Radiation (20)

What happens to_your_brain_on_the_way_to_mars
What happens to_your_brain_on_the_way_to_marsWhat happens to_your_brain_on_the_way_to_mars
What happens to_your_brain_on_the_way_to_mars
 
Biophysical fields. color coronal spectral analysis.
Biophysical fields. color coronal spectral analysis.Biophysical fields. color coronal spectral analysis.
Biophysical fields. color coronal spectral analysis.
 
Stereotactic Radiosurgery (SRS)
Stereotactic Radiosurgery (SRS)Stereotactic Radiosurgery (SRS)
Stereotactic Radiosurgery (SRS)
 
DNA Damage and Responses in Space
DNA Damage and Responses in SpaceDNA Damage and Responses in Space
DNA Damage and Responses in Space
 
Radiotherapy in gynaecology
Radiotherapy in gynaecologyRadiotherapy in gynaecology
Radiotherapy in gynaecology
 
WarmLowdensityCoolHighdensityWarmPlati.docx
WarmLowdensityCoolHighdensityWarmPlati.docxWarmLowdensityCoolHighdensityWarmPlati.docx
WarmLowdensityCoolHighdensityWarmPlati.docx
 
Protection of humans during long space flight. using cannabis to reduce biol...
Protection of humans during long space flight. using cannabis to reduce biol...Protection of humans during long space flight. using cannabis to reduce biol...
Protection of humans during long space flight. using cannabis to reduce biol...
 
Review Paper 1
Review Paper 1Review Paper 1
Review Paper 1
 
Magnetoencephalography
MagnetoencephalographyMagnetoencephalography
Magnetoencephalography
 
A Renaissance in Low Level Laser (light) lllt
A Renaissance in Low Level Laser (light) llltA Renaissance in Low Level Laser (light) lllt
A Renaissance in Low Level Laser (light) lllt
 
Prophylaxis,Treatment of Acute Toxic Radiation Cerebrovascular Syndrome Asso...
Prophylaxis,Treatment of Acute Toxic Radiation  Cerebrovascular Syndrome Asso...Prophylaxis,Treatment of Acute Toxic Radiation  Cerebrovascular Syndrome Asso...
Prophylaxis,Treatment of Acute Toxic Radiation Cerebrovascular Syndrome Asso...
 
B1104010612
B1104010612B1104010612
B1104010612
 
Characterizing the Effect of Static Magnetic Fields on C. elegans Using Micro...
Characterizing the Effect of Static Magnetic Fields on C. elegans Using Micro...Characterizing the Effect of Static Magnetic Fields on C. elegans Using Micro...
Characterizing the Effect of Static Magnetic Fields on C. elegans Using Micro...
 
Biological effects of radiation
Biological effects of radiationBiological effects of radiation
Biological effects of radiation
 
Potencial de Acción_nihms97019.pdf
Potencial de Acción_nihms97019.pdfPotencial de Acción_nihms97019.pdf
Potencial de Acción_nihms97019.pdf
 
Seminar 1 ppt (ddr space)new edited...DNA damage and responses in space
Seminar 1 ppt (ddr space)new edited...DNA damage and responses in spaceSeminar 1 ppt (ddr space)new edited...DNA damage and responses in space
Seminar 1 ppt (ddr space)new edited...DNA damage and responses in space
 
SR_bmes_2006_FINAL_061009
SR_bmes_2006_FINAL_061009SR_bmes_2006_FINAL_061009
SR_bmes_2006_FINAL_061009
 
Effect of Static Magnetic Field on Parasitic Worms in MicroChips
Effect of Static Magnetic Field on Parasitic Worms in MicroChipsEffect of Static Magnetic Field on Parasitic Worms in MicroChips
Effect of Static Magnetic Field on Parasitic Worms in MicroChips
 
Kimpo et al_JNsci 2003
Kimpo et al_JNsci 2003Kimpo et al_JNsci 2003
Kimpo et al_JNsci 2003
 
Andrew Goldsworthy to British Society for Ecological Medicine at the Royal Co...
Andrew Goldsworthy to British Society for Ecological Medicine at the Royal Co...Andrew Goldsworthy to British Society for Ecological Medicine at the Royal Co...
Andrew Goldsworthy to British Society for Ecological Medicine at the Royal Co...
 

More from Sean Everett

More from Sean Everett (6)

Space as a Platform
Space as a PlatformSpace as a Platform
Space as a Platform
 
New Equity & HR Document for Startups
New Equity & HR Document for StartupsNew Equity & HR Document for Startups
New Equity & HR Document for Startups
 
900 VCs Surveyed on How They Invest
900 VCs Surveyed on How They Invest900 VCs Surveyed on How They Invest
900 VCs Surveyed on How They Invest
 
Nervana AI Overview Deck April 2016
Nervana AI Overview Deck April 2016Nervana AI Overview Deck April 2016
Nervana AI Overview Deck April 2016
 
Piksel Fuse Meta Data
Piksel Fuse Meta DataPiksel Fuse Meta Data
Piksel Fuse Meta Data
 
Next Generation Video Platform
Next Generation Video PlatformNext Generation Video Platform
Next Generation Video Platform
 

Recently uploaded

ooty Call Girls 👙 6297143586 👙 Genuine WhatsApp Number for Real Meet
ooty Call Girls 👙 6297143586 👙 Genuine WhatsApp Number for Real Meetooty Call Girls 👙 6297143586 👙 Genuine WhatsApp Number for Real Meet
ooty Call Girls 👙 6297143586 👙 Genuine WhatsApp Number for Real Meet
Call Girls Service
 
Mangalore Call Girls 👙 6297143586 👙 Genuine WhatsApp Number for Real Meet
Mangalore Call Girls 👙 6297143586 👙 Genuine WhatsApp Number for Real MeetMangalore Call Girls 👙 6297143586 👙 Genuine WhatsApp Number for Real Meet
Mangalore Call Girls 👙 6297143586 👙 Genuine WhatsApp Number for Real Meet
Call Girls Service
 
palanpur Call Girls 👙 6297143586 👙 Genuine WhatsApp Number for Real Meet
palanpur Call Girls 👙 6297143586 👙 Genuine WhatsApp Number for Real Meetpalanpur Call Girls 👙 6297143586 👙 Genuine WhatsApp Number for Real Meet
palanpur Call Girls 👙 6297143586 👙 Genuine WhatsApp Number for Real Meet
Call Girls Service
 
dhanbad Call Girls 👙 6297143586 👙 Genuine WhatsApp Number for Real Meet
dhanbad Call Girls 👙 6297143586 👙 Genuine WhatsApp Number for Real Meetdhanbad Call Girls 👙 6297143586 👙 Genuine WhatsApp Number for Real Meet
dhanbad Call Girls 👙 6297143586 👙 Genuine WhatsApp Number for Real Meet
Call Girls Service
 
neemuch Call Girls 👙 6297143586 👙 Genuine WhatsApp Number for Real Meet
neemuch Call Girls 👙 6297143586 👙 Genuine WhatsApp Number for Real Meetneemuch Call Girls 👙 6297143586 👙 Genuine WhatsApp Number for Real Meet
neemuch Call Girls 👙 6297143586 👙 Genuine WhatsApp Number for Real Meet
Call Girls Service
 
Thoothukudi Call Girls 👙 6297143586 👙 Genuine WhatsApp Number for Real Meet
Thoothukudi Call Girls 👙 6297143586 👙 Genuine WhatsApp Number for Real MeetThoothukudi Call Girls 👙 6297143586 👙 Genuine WhatsApp Number for Real Meet
Thoothukudi Call Girls 👙 6297143586 👙 Genuine WhatsApp Number for Real Meet
Call Girls Service
 
kochi Call Girls 👙 6297143586 👙 Genuine WhatsApp Number for Real Meet
kochi Call Girls 👙 6297143586 👙 Genuine WhatsApp Number for Real Meetkochi Call Girls 👙 6297143586 👙 Genuine WhatsApp Number for Real Meet
kochi Call Girls 👙 6297143586 👙 Genuine WhatsApp Number for Real Meet
Call Girls Service
 
bhopal Call Girls 👙 6297143586 👙 Genuine WhatsApp Number for Real Meet
bhopal Call Girls 👙 6297143586 👙 Genuine WhatsApp Number for Real Meetbhopal Call Girls 👙 6297143586 👙 Genuine WhatsApp Number for Real Meet
bhopal Call Girls 👙 6297143586 👙 Genuine WhatsApp Number for Real Meet
Call Girls Service
 
bhubaneswar Call Girls 👙 6297143586 👙 Genuine WhatsApp Number for Real Meet
bhubaneswar Call Girls 👙 6297143586 👙 Genuine WhatsApp Number for Real Meetbhubaneswar Call Girls 👙 6297143586 👙 Genuine WhatsApp Number for Real Meet
bhubaneswar Call Girls 👙 6297143586 👙 Genuine WhatsApp Number for Real Meet
Call Girls Service
 
Erode Call Girls 👙 6297143586 👙 Genuine WhatsApp Number for Real Meet
Erode Call Girls 👙 6297143586 👙 Genuine WhatsApp Number for Real MeetErode Call Girls 👙 6297143586 👙 Genuine WhatsApp Number for Real Meet
Erode Call Girls 👙 6297143586 👙 Genuine WhatsApp Number for Real Meet
Call Girls Service
 
Ernakulam Call Girls 👙 6297143586 👙 Genuine WhatsApp Number for Real Meet
Ernakulam Call Girls 👙 6297143586 👙 Genuine WhatsApp Number for Real MeetErnakulam Call Girls 👙 6297143586 👙 Genuine WhatsApp Number for Real Meet
Ernakulam Call Girls 👙 6297143586 👙 Genuine WhatsApp Number for Real Meet
Call Girls Chandigarh
 
Hubli Call Girls 👙 6297143586 👙 Genuine WhatsApp Number for Real Meet
Hubli Call Girls 👙 6297143586 👙 Genuine WhatsApp Number for Real MeetHubli Call Girls 👙 6297143586 👙 Genuine WhatsApp Number for Real Meet
Hubli Call Girls 👙 6297143586 👙 Genuine WhatsApp Number for Real Meet
Call Girls Service
 
Sambalpur Call Girls 👙 6297143586 👙 Genuine WhatsApp Number for Real Meet
Sambalpur Call Girls 👙 6297143586 👙 Genuine WhatsApp Number for Real MeetSambalpur Call Girls 👙 6297143586 👙 Genuine WhatsApp Number for Real Meet
Sambalpur Call Girls 👙 6297143586 👙 Genuine WhatsApp Number for Real Meet
Call Girls Service
 
surat Call Girls 👙 6297143586 👙 Genuine WhatsApp Number for Real Meet
surat Call Girls 👙 6297143586 👙 Genuine WhatsApp Number for Real Meetsurat Call Girls 👙 6297143586 👙 Genuine WhatsApp Number for Real Meet
surat Call Girls 👙 6297143586 👙 Genuine WhatsApp Number for Real Meet
Call Girls Chandigarh
 
Rajkot Call Girls 👙 6297143586 👙 Genuine WhatsApp Number for Real Meet
Rajkot Call Girls 👙 6297143586 👙 Genuine WhatsApp Number for Real MeetRajkot Call Girls 👙 6297143586 👙 Genuine WhatsApp Number for Real Meet
Rajkot Call Girls 👙 6297143586 👙 Genuine WhatsApp Number for Real Meet
Call Girls Service
 

Recently uploaded (20)

Sexy Call Girl Dharmapuri Arshi 💚9058824046💚 Dharmapuri Escort Service
Sexy Call Girl Dharmapuri Arshi 💚9058824046💚 Dharmapuri Escort ServiceSexy Call Girl Dharmapuri Arshi 💚9058824046💚 Dharmapuri Escort Service
Sexy Call Girl Dharmapuri Arshi 💚9058824046💚 Dharmapuri Escort Service
 
ooty Call Girls 👙 6297143586 👙 Genuine WhatsApp Number for Real Meet
ooty Call Girls 👙 6297143586 👙 Genuine WhatsApp Number for Real Meetooty Call Girls 👙 6297143586 👙 Genuine WhatsApp Number for Real Meet
ooty Call Girls 👙 6297143586 👙 Genuine WhatsApp Number for Real Meet
 
Mangalore Call Girls 👙 6297143586 👙 Genuine WhatsApp Number for Real Meet
Mangalore Call Girls 👙 6297143586 👙 Genuine WhatsApp Number for Real MeetMangalore Call Girls 👙 6297143586 👙 Genuine WhatsApp Number for Real Meet
Mangalore Call Girls 👙 6297143586 👙 Genuine WhatsApp Number for Real Meet
 
palanpur Call Girls 👙 6297143586 👙 Genuine WhatsApp Number for Real Meet
palanpur Call Girls 👙 6297143586 👙 Genuine WhatsApp Number for Real Meetpalanpur Call Girls 👙 6297143586 👙 Genuine WhatsApp Number for Real Meet
palanpur Call Girls 👙 6297143586 👙 Genuine WhatsApp Number for Real Meet
 
Kolkata Call Girls Miss Inaaya ❤️ at @30% discount Everyday Call girl
Kolkata Call Girls Miss Inaaya ❤️ at @30% discount Everyday Call girlKolkata Call Girls Miss Inaaya ❤️ at @30% discount Everyday Call girl
Kolkata Call Girls Miss Inaaya ❤️ at @30% discount Everyday Call girl
 
Vip Call Girls Makarba 👙 6367187148 👙 Genuine WhatsApp Number for Real Meet
Vip Call Girls Makarba 👙 6367187148 👙 Genuine WhatsApp Number for Real MeetVip Call Girls Makarba 👙 6367187148 👙 Genuine WhatsApp Number for Real Meet
Vip Call Girls Makarba 👙 6367187148 👙 Genuine WhatsApp Number for Real Meet
 
dhanbad Call Girls 👙 6297143586 👙 Genuine WhatsApp Number for Real Meet
dhanbad Call Girls 👙 6297143586 👙 Genuine WhatsApp Number for Real Meetdhanbad Call Girls 👙 6297143586 👙 Genuine WhatsApp Number for Real Meet
dhanbad Call Girls 👙 6297143586 👙 Genuine WhatsApp Number for Real Meet
 
neemuch Call Girls 👙 6297143586 👙 Genuine WhatsApp Number for Real Meet
neemuch Call Girls 👙 6297143586 👙 Genuine WhatsApp Number for Real Meetneemuch Call Girls 👙 6297143586 👙 Genuine WhatsApp Number for Real Meet
neemuch Call Girls 👙 6297143586 👙 Genuine WhatsApp Number for Real Meet
 
Thoothukudi Call Girls 👙 6297143586 👙 Genuine WhatsApp Number for Real Meet
Thoothukudi Call Girls 👙 6297143586 👙 Genuine WhatsApp Number for Real MeetThoothukudi Call Girls 👙 6297143586 👙 Genuine WhatsApp Number for Real Meet
Thoothukudi Call Girls 👙 6297143586 👙 Genuine WhatsApp Number for Real Meet
 
Escorts Service Ahmedabad🌹6367187148 🌹 No Need For Advance Payments
Escorts Service Ahmedabad🌹6367187148 🌹 No Need For Advance PaymentsEscorts Service Ahmedabad🌹6367187148 🌹 No Need For Advance Payments
Escorts Service Ahmedabad🌹6367187148 🌹 No Need For Advance Payments
 
kochi Call Girls 👙 6297143586 👙 Genuine WhatsApp Number for Real Meet
kochi Call Girls 👙 6297143586 👙 Genuine WhatsApp Number for Real Meetkochi Call Girls 👙 6297143586 👙 Genuine WhatsApp Number for Real Meet
kochi Call Girls 👙 6297143586 👙 Genuine WhatsApp Number for Real Meet
 
bhopal Call Girls 👙 6297143586 👙 Genuine WhatsApp Number for Real Meet
bhopal Call Girls 👙 6297143586 👙 Genuine WhatsApp Number for Real Meetbhopal Call Girls 👙 6297143586 👙 Genuine WhatsApp Number for Real Meet
bhopal Call Girls 👙 6297143586 👙 Genuine WhatsApp Number for Real Meet
 
bhubaneswar Call Girls 👙 6297143586 👙 Genuine WhatsApp Number for Real Meet
bhubaneswar Call Girls 👙 6297143586 👙 Genuine WhatsApp Number for Real Meetbhubaneswar Call Girls 👙 6297143586 👙 Genuine WhatsApp Number for Real Meet
bhubaneswar Call Girls 👙 6297143586 👙 Genuine WhatsApp Number for Real Meet
 
Call Girls Service Mohali {7435815124} ❤️VVIP PALAK Call Girl in Mohali Punjab
Call Girls Service Mohali {7435815124} ❤️VVIP PALAK Call Girl in Mohali PunjabCall Girls Service Mohali {7435815124} ❤️VVIP PALAK Call Girl in Mohali Punjab
Call Girls Service Mohali {7435815124} ❤️VVIP PALAK Call Girl in Mohali Punjab
 
Erode Call Girls 👙 6297143586 👙 Genuine WhatsApp Number for Real Meet
Erode Call Girls 👙 6297143586 👙 Genuine WhatsApp Number for Real MeetErode Call Girls 👙 6297143586 👙 Genuine WhatsApp Number for Real Meet
Erode Call Girls 👙 6297143586 👙 Genuine WhatsApp Number for Real Meet
 
Ernakulam Call Girls 👙 6297143586 👙 Genuine WhatsApp Number for Real Meet
Ernakulam Call Girls 👙 6297143586 👙 Genuine WhatsApp Number for Real MeetErnakulam Call Girls 👙 6297143586 👙 Genuine WhatsApp Number for Real Meet
Ernakulam Call Girls 👙 6297143586 👙 Genuine WhatsApp Number for Real Meet
 
Hubli Call Girls 👙 6297143586 👙 Genuine WhatsApp Number for Real Meet
Hubli Call Girls 👙 6297143586 👙 Genuine WhatsApp Number for Real MeetHubli Call Girls 👙 6297143586 👙 Genuine WhatsApp Number for Real Meet
Hubli Call Girls 👙 6297143586 👙 Genuine WhatsApp Number for Real Meet
 
Sambalpur Call Girls 👙 6297143586 👙 Genuine WhatsApp Number for Real Meet
Sambalpur Call Girls 👙 6297143586 👙 Genuine WhatsApp Number for Real MeetSambalpur Call Girls 👙 6297143586 👙 Genuine WhatsApp Number for Real Meet
Sambalpur Call Girls 👙 6297143586 👙 Genuine WhatsApp Number for Real Meet
 
surat Call Girls 👙 6297143586 👙 Genuine WhatsApp Number for Real Meet
surat Call Girls 👙 6297143586 👙 Genuine WhatsApp Number for Real Meetsurat Call Girls 👙 6297143586 👙 Genuine WhatsApp Number for Real Meet
surat Call Girls 👙 6297143586 👙 Genuine WhatsApp Number for Real Meet
 
Rajkot Call Girls 👙 6297143586 👙 Genuine WhatsApp Number for Real Meet
Rajkot Call Girls 👙 6297143586 👙 Genuine WhatsApp Number for Real MeetRajkot Call Girls 👙 6297143586 👙 Genuine WhatsApp Number for Real Meet
Rajkot Call Girls 👙 6297143586 👙 Genuine WhatsApp Number for Real Meet
 

Neurological Effects of Space Radiation

  • 1. Gravitational and Space Biology 22(2) September 2009 33 NEUROLOGICAL EFFECTS OF SPACE RADIATION Gregory A. Nelson, Ph.D. Loma Linda University, Loma Linda, CA ABSTRACT In this brief review, several aspects of radiation effects on the central nervous system are considered. Low to moderate levels (~ 1 to 2 Gy) of charged particle radiation exposure will characterize the environment experienced by astronauts on long- term space missions. These doses are well below those associated with gross pathological changes and tissue breakdown; however, they may cause persistent functional changes. The intrinsic membrane properties of mature neurons appear be stable to space-like radiation exposures but their connectivity and information processing properties are persistently altered. These alterations result in altered excitability with reductions in synaptic remodeling for many months post irradiation. Changes in information processing due to synaptic changes as well as depletion of neural precursor cells may in turn lead to reduced cognitive abilities. Supporting this idea, behavioral studies on irradiated rodents and human children have shown that performance decrements do occur in the space operations dose range. An analysis of charged particle track interactions with neuron structure suggests that nearly every nerve cell’s dendritic or axonal arborizations will be traversed by multiple cosmic rays during a long duration space mission. The functional changes observed experimentally are associated with the complex arborizations of nerve cells and their structural specializations. Although the data for charged particle radiation exposures are sparse, the available observations from all exposure regimens point to a credible risk of cognitive or performance decrements during long term space missions. KEYWORDS Central nervous system, hippocampus, neurogenesis, space radiation, synapse. INTRODUCTION The effects of radiation on the central nervous system (CNS) have been investigated for many years, but primarily in the context of radiotherapy. In this context, survival of cells is the key indicator as the emphasis is on tumor control, while minimizing side effects to normal tissue. Most of these studies have employed gamma rays or X-rays and typically, high doses (> 20 Gy) are applied to local areas. This results in steep dose response curves for white matter degeneration in either cortex (leukencephalopathy) or the spinal cord (myelopathy) which appears after a substantial time lag of many months (Debus et al., 2003). This may be accompanied by edema, breakdown of the blood-brain barrier, swelling of vessels (telangiaectasia), inflammatory reactions and sometimes necrosis. In this literature, there has been an active debate about whether vascular endothelial cells or parenchymal cells (especially oligodendrocytes) are the dose limiting cells of the tissue which is characterized overall by low rates of cell division and replacement. Three excellent reviews of this literature are: Wong and Van der Kogel, 2004; Tofilon and Fike, 2000; Schultheiss et al.,1995. Many of the mainstream opinions about CNS radiation responses are derived from results that result from high dose exposures. These may not extrapolate well to effects of the space environment in which the relevant exposures are in the dose range of < 2 Gy delivered slowly to the whole body by mixed fields of charged particles. In this exposure regime there is much less known, and NASA’s interest is in establishing whether: 1) there are acute risks that could lead to mission compromising performance impairments, and 2) whether the severity and onset of neurodegenerative conditions later in life may be enhanced or accelerated. The following presentation will consider some selected studies that address this lower dose regime, with emphasis on charged particle effects if known. Charged Particle Radiation The unique properties of charged particles are associated with their track structure. Unlike X-rays and gamma rays which are absorbed in an exponential fashion with depth in tissue, charged particles have a defined range and deposit their energy at an increasing rate until they reach the end of their range. This rate of energy loss is termed the linear energy transfer or LET and is commonly used as a measure of the quality of the radiation or its ionization density. Charged particle interactions with electrons in the target material are primarily electrostatic rather than through processes such as Compton scattering. Because the particles have significant mass, they travel in relatively straight lines and about half of the energy they deposit is confined to a narrow cylinder (track core) about 20 nm in diameter along the track. The other half of their energy is deposited through radially scattered electrons around the track core. These properties tend to concentrate damage along the track rather than in the more diffuse damage patterns produced by X-ray and gamma ray exposures. Unique DNA damage, genotoxicity and tissue responses have been described for such densely ionizing radiation and many of these properties have been reviewed in volume 16 of this Bulletin (Nelson, 2003). Cellular Level Responses The first level of biological organization to explore is the neuron with its excitable membrane that is the basic ____________________ * Correspondence to: Gregory A. Nelson Radiobiology Program Loma Linda University Loma Linda, CA 92354 Email: gnelson@dominion.llumc.edu Phone: 909-558-8364; Fax: 909-558-0825
  • 2. G.A. Nelson — Neurological Effects of Space Radiation 34 Gravitational and Space Biology 22(2) September 2009 functional unit of the nervous system. It might be expected that radiation-induced lipid peroxidation reactions would compromise neuronal electrochemical gradients, membrane receptors and ion channels Extensive studies of membrane fluidity, cell leakage and activities of Na+ /K+ ATPases and acetylcholinsterases show that only doses in excess of 100 Gy are significantly deleterious, although lipid chain shortening is observed at lower dose (Benderitter et al., 2003; Krokosz and Szweda-Lewandowska,2005). However, isolated rat synaptosomes show decreased 22 Na+ uptake after 1 Gy of gamma rays (Mullin et al., 1986) and some tissue culture cells exhibit alterations in Ca2+ transport after 1-4 Gy of electrons (Todd and Mikkelsen, 1994) suggesting sensitivity of ion channels. Direct measurements of charged particle-induced lipid peroxidation of liposomes shows that they are much less effective than X-rays (Ziegler & Wessels, 1998). In early studies, the conduction velocities of compound action potentials along isolated frog and rabbit sciatic nerves was found to be very resistant to radiation, requiring in excess of 500 Gy to show conduction block (Gerstner et al., 1955). Recent studies using patch clamp recordings from mouse hippocampal slices indicate that intrinsic membrane properties of pyramidal neurons are resistant to change after 1-4 Gy of iron ions or 1-8 Gy of protons (NSCOR, unpublished). Together these results emphasize the stability of nerve functional properties to radiation exposure. By contrast, the survival of cultured NT2 human neural precursor cells is quite sensitive to charged particles and shows significant LET-dependent apoptosis and necrotic death at doses < 0.5 Gy (Guida et al. 2005). Growth of new processes (neuritogenesis) from neurons in chick retinal explants is also sensitive to iron ions at doses below 0.5 Gy (Vazquez et al., 1994). So, survival, growth and different-tiation properties of neurons are radio-sensitive in the space radiation dose range while the functional integrity of fully differentiated neurons appears to be relatively stable. Electrical Output of Nerve Ensembles The primary function of systems of nerves is to generate output signals in response to input from other neurons and environmental cues. Early experiments using implanted microelectrodes in rabbits measured spontaneous electrical activity from a number of brain locations including hippocampus, thalamus and cortex. Significant decreases in the frequency and amplitude of spikes were observed in most brain regions after 4 – 5 Gy at times up to 6 hr, but the hippocampus exhibited hyperexcitability along with changes in spike train organization that may be associated with inhibitory neuron malfunction (Monnier and Krupp, 1962). At higher doses (9 Gy) all activity was suppressed. Visually-evoked potentials in mice irradiated with 20 MeV deuterons exhibited spike amplitude and firing pattern modifications after 5 Gy (Ordy et al., 1968) and the pedal-pleural ganglion of the sea slug Aplysia exhibited increased excitability after 10 Gy of 137 Cs gamma rays (Clatworthy et al., 1999). Pellmar and collaborators performed recordings on Guinea Pig hippocampal slices during or shortly after irradiation and demonstrated increases in synaptic efficacy (dendritic response) while population spikes (somatic response) were inhibited at gamma ray doses above 30 Gy (Pellmar et al., 1990; 1993). All of the above observations demonstrate that changes in output may occur within hours after > 4 Gy of low LET radiation but do not address late changes or responses to high LET radiation. Recent field recording experiments conducted by Vlkolinsky et al. (2007) under NASA funding (NSCOR, unpublished) examined mouse hippocampal slices isolated from 1 to 18 months following 0 to 4 Gy of accelerated iron ions or protons. These demonstrated that synaptic efficacy was increased long after irradiation and led to hyperexcitability. However, in the simple long term potentiation (LTP) model of memory, synaptic remodeling between pyramidal neurons was inhibited months after 1-2 Gy of iron ions. LTP is correlated with hippocampus functions in spatial memory and learning using behavioral measures. These electrophysiological paradigms report alterations in the number and strength of synapses as well as glutamate receptor function and are mostly post-synaptic in their anatomical distribution. Observations on the important neural adhesion molecule NCAM, which regulates synaptic plasticity, show that it is down-regulated after doses of 2.5 Gy of 1 GeV/n iron ions in rats (Casadesus et al., 2005) and > 0.5 Gy of iron ions in mice (NSCOR, unpublished). These observations suggest that the output of systems of neurons (and their associated glia) is altered after irradiation at the level of connectivity between cells in the networks. Further, these systems are vulnerable to charged particle doses of the same order as predicted for long term space missions and exhibit defects in information processing that underlies all CNS functions. The observed hyperexcitability may also indicate an enhanced susceptibility to seizures. Neural Precursor Cells The most radiosensitive cells of the CNS are neural precursor cells (NPC). These astrocyte-like stem cells located in the linings of the ventricles and in the subgranular layer of the hippocampus continue to divide throughout life in mammals. They differentiate into astrocytes, oligodendrocytes and neurons which become incorporated into neuronal circuits and contribute to learning and memory. J.R. Fike and others have demonstrated that X-ray doses of 2-5 Gy cause substantial apoptosis of NPCs and continued reduction in the production of immature neurons (Mizamatsu et al., 2003; Rola et al., 2004). Lower doses of ~1 Gy iron ions result in similar elimination of NPCs (NSCOR, unpublished). Further, irradiation causes remodeling of the CNS microenvironment resulting in a state that inhibits differentiation of resident NPC descendents (or grafted unirradiated NPCs) and the continued elevated production of reactive oxygen species (Monje et al., 2002; Limoli et al., 2007) and chronic activation of microglia (Rola et al., 2004). Iron ions are much more effective than 250 MeV
  • 3. G.A. Nelson — Neurological Effects of Space Radiation Gravitational and Space Biology 22(2) September 2009 35 protons or X-rays (NSCOR, unpublished). The loss of NPC regenerative capacity may lead to accelerated learning and memory decline with age. Behavioral and Cognitive Effects Electrophysiological and neurogenesis experiments are consistent with behavioral observations on rats and mice irradiated with charged particles. Morris water maze and Barnes maze experiments indicate that spatial memory and learning are inhibited by doses as low as 0.1 Gy of iron ions (Shukitt-Hale et al., 2000; Raber et al., 2004). These behaviors are believed to be largely associated with the hippocampus. Conditioned taste aversion to amphetamine (but not lithium) in rats is inhibited at doses of >0.1 – 0.8 Gy iron ions in rats implicating dopamine pathways. Ascending scale operant conditioning studies (food reward after lever pressing) also indicate that, in rodents, cognitive abilities may be susceptible to low doses of charged particles (2 Gy iron ions) (Rabin et al., 2004). But are humans susceptible to radiation in the low dose regime? Adult radiotherapy patients treated for head, neck and brain tumors have commonly reported depression, confusion and lethargy; but these are individuals receiving high localized doses and who have underlying medical conditions. There are, however, observations on human children that have shown sensitivity of still-developing nervous systems to low LET radiation. In Israel, a large cohort of children (~20,000 of average age 7 years) were treated with a mean dose of 1.3 Gy X-rays to cause depilation of the scalp in order to facilitate treatment of tinea capitis fungal infections. These children later showed poorer outcomes in high school aptitude and IQ performance and more frequent psychiatric disturbances in later life. (Ron et al., 1982). A group of 6-18 month-old Swedish children treated for cutaneous hemangioma (strawberry birthmarks) on the head were followed-up at the time of comprehensive testing prior to military enlistment (age 18 – 19 years). They showed cognitive impairments at doses above 0.1 Gy and up to 32% decreases in high school attendance (corrected for social influences) after frontal lobe X-ray doses > 0.25 Gy (Hall et al., 2004). So, human CNS tissue that is still undergoing growth and differentiation is susceptible to space-like doses of low LET radiation. Together with animal behavioral studies this suggests that low doses of charged particles may be of concern in adults, especially with respect to brain regions or processes dependent on continued neurogenesis. Fluence-Based Assessment of the Cellular Target In estimating risks from fields of charged particles, especially at low doses, it has been useful to consider the fluence of particles rather than the dose The planar fluence is the number of particles that traverse a unit area and dose is proportional to fluence and LET. In this way the contributions from different particles expressed as the probability of exhibiting an endpoint (such as mutation or cell death) per particle type can be summed to estimate the total probability. Using this strategy, Curtis et al. have estimated the number of traversals of cell nuclei or soma in different CNS structures for a reference 3-year Mars mission (Curtis et al., 1998). They showed that approximately 46% of cell somas (areas from 180 – 486 µm2 ) and 7.6% of cell nuclei (areas 40 – 100 µm2 ) in human hippocampal cells would be traversed by at least one particle of atomic number Z ≥ 15. By extension, 16,000 cells in the retinal macula, 2x107 cells of the hippocampus, and 850,000 cells of the thalamus would be “hit” by such heavy ions. These calculations were motivated by cell survival as the significant endpoint but experiments suggest that fully differentiated cells are radioresistant for survival. Extensive modeling of network failure modes in the hippocampus have shown that a very high proportion of cells in the hilar region must be lost before there are significant changes in connectivity (Dyhrfjeld-Johnsen et al., 2007). This suggests that minor cell loss would not lead to major functional changes. The situation may be different for radiosensitive NPCs, however. If they are preferentially incorporated into new memories, then lower fractions of cell loss may be significant. From the discussion above on functional output, it can be argued that dendritic and axonal arborizations may be the more relevant cellular targets, so a re-examination of the impact of fluence is in order. Neuroanatomical studies have characterized the number and topology of neuronal processes; from these studies, the properties of hippocampal CA1 (subfield cornu ammonis 1) pyramidal neurons are summarized below for the rat (Pyapali et al., 1998; The Hippocampus Book, 2007): • Cell soma diameter: 15 µm with cross sectional area = 193 µm2 • Total dendritic length per cell: 1.2 – 1.3 cm at 1.0 to 2.5 µm diameter. • Total axon length per cell: ~ 0.2 cm and diameter < 1 µm. • Total dendritic spines per cell: ~30,000. • Total spine synapses per cell: 10,000 – 30,000 (of which only 16-26 need to fire synchronously to generate action potentials). From these dimensions and three dimensional reconstructions of cells it was possible to calculate the cross sectional area of a typical pyramidal cell at 11,800 +/- 3,200 µm2 (N=11) and the number density of synapses at between 1 and 2 per µm3 . Using these areas and the estimated Mars mission fluences from Curtis et al. (1998), Poisson distribution calculations yield the following. At solar minimum, with a fluence for Z ≥ 15 ions of 107,000/cm2 , each cell body would be traversed, on average, by 0.21 particles (1 out of 5 cells) whereas each arbor area would be traversed by 12.8 particles (a 128-fold greater value). At solar maximum, with a Z ≥ 15 fluence of 59,300/cm2 , the values are 0.14 hits per soma and 7.1 hits per arbor (a 71-fold greater value). Thus, essentially every cell will be traversed multiple times and
  • 4. G.A. Nelson — Neurological Effects of Space Radiation 36 Gravitational and Space Biology 22(2) September 2009 the high interconnectivity of neurons is likely to spread the influence of each traversal to many cells. Another estimate can be made from the track structure of the particles. Chatterjee and collaborators (Chatterjee and Schaefer, 1976) employed a model for particle tracks that describes the local dose as a function of radial distance from the track axis. Applying their model to 600 MeV/n iron ions or 250 MeV/n protons (which are relevant energies for accelerator experiments, cosmic rays and solar particle events) one may estimate that cylindrical regions within 4.5 µm of an iron ion track axis will receive ≥ 1 cGy dose and regions within 2 µm will receive at least 5 cGy. For protons the corresponding radial distances are 0.32 and 0.05 µm. At 2 synapses per µm3 this means that for iron ions, 25,132 synapses per millimeter track length receive ≥ 5 cGy dose and 127,235/mm receive ≥ 1 cGy. For protons the values are 16/mm and 643/mm, respectively. If only 16-26 synapses must be activated to initiate an action potential (The Hippocampus Book, 2007), and if 5 cGy has a 10% chance of activating a synapse, then for each millimeter of iron track length, approximately 2500 synapses could be activated and could, in turn, result in 100 action potentials in interconnected neurons participating in the same pathway or local circuit. Sufficient activation might mimic the effects of high frequency (tetanic) stimulation to neuron ensembles leading to persistent changes in their synaptic strengths and efficacies. Perhaps the light flashes perceived by astronauts during to the passage of charged particles through their retinas reflect such activation processes. SUMMARY In this brief review, several aspects of radiation effects on the central nervous system were considered. It was shown that although major necrotic and demyelinating changes are not expected from exposures to space radiation, there may still be enduring functional consequences. While the excitability properties of mature neurons are expected to be stable, their connectivity and information processing properties may be persistently altered. These alterations result in hyperexcitability, perhaps with attendant seizure risks. Changes in information processing due to synaptic changes and/or depletion of newly-born neurons may also lead to reduced cognitive abilities. Radiation-induced alterations in the CNS microenvironment could stabilize an unfavorable milieu for cell function and replacement possibly through oxidative stress and inflammatory mechanisms. Behavioral studies on young adult rodents exposed to charged particles and observations of human children exposed to photons have shown that performance decrements can occur in the dose range associated with space operations. Finally, a reconsideration of how charged particle tracks interact with neuron structure suggests that nearly every nerve cell’s dendritic or axonal arborizations will be traversed by multiple cosmic rays during a long duration space mission. Thus, earlier estimates focusing on cell survival alone may underestimate the potential for deleterious functional changes. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The author wishes to thank the many co-investigators on the NSCOR program project investigating the effects of charged particles on the mouse hippocampus for providing focus and perspective on the properties of the central nervous system. Funding for this effort was provided by NASA grant NNJ04HC90G. REFERENCES Benderitter, M., Vincent-Genod, L., Pouget, J.P. and P. Voisin. 2003. The cell membrane as a biosensor of oxidative stress induced by radiation exposure: a multiparameter investigation. Radiation Research 159:471-483. Casadesus, G., Shukitt-Hale, B., Stellwagen, H.M., Smith, M.A., Rabin, B.M. and J.A. Joseph. 2005. Hippocampal neurogenesis and PSA-NCAM expression following exposure to 56 Fe particles mimics that seen during aging in rats. Experimental Gerontology 40:249-254. Chatterjee, A. and H. Schaefer. 1976. Microdosimetric structure of heavy ion tracks in tissue. Radiation and Environmental Biophysics. 13: 215-227. Clatworthy, A.L., Noel, F., Grose, E., Cui, M. and P.J. Tofilon. 1999. Ionizing radiation-induced alterations in the electrophysiological properties of Aplysia sensory neurons. Neuroscience Letters 268:45-48. Curtis, S.E., Nealy, J.E. and J.W. Wilson. 1995. Risk cross section and their application to risk estimation in the galactic cosmic-ray environment. Radiation Research 141:57–65. Curtis, S.B., Vazquez, M.E., Wilson, J.W., Atwell, W., Kim, M., and J. Capala. 1998. Cosmic Ray Hit Frequencies in Critical Sites in the Central Nervous System. Advance in Space Research 22:197-207. Debus, J., Scholz, M., Haberer, T., Peschke, P., Jäkel, O., Karger, C.P., Wannenmacher, M. 2003. Radiation tolerance of the rat spinal cord after single and split doses of photons and carbon ions. Radiation Research 160:536- 542. Dyhrfjeld-Johnsen, J., Santhakumar, V., Morgan, R.J., Huerta, R., Tsimring, L., and I. Soltesz. 2007. Topological determinants of epileptogenesis in large-scale structural and functional models of the dentate gyrus derived from experimental data. Journal of Neurophysiology. 97:1566-1587.
  • 5. G.A. Nelson — Neurological Effects of Space Radiation Gravitational and Space Biology 22(2) September 2009 37 Gerstner, H.B., Orth, J.S. and E.O. Richey. 1955. Effect of high-intensity x-radiation on velocity of nerve conduction. American Journal of Physiology 180:232- 236. Guida, P., Vazquez, M.E. and S. Otto. 2005. Cytotoxic effects of low- and high-LET radiation on human neuronal progenitor cells: induction of apoptosis and TP53 gene expression. Radiation Research 164:545-551. Hall, P., Adami, H.O., Trichopoulos, D., Pedersen, N.L., Lagiou, P., Ekbom, A., Ingvar, M., Lundell, M. and F. Granath. 2004. Effect of low doses of ionizing radiation in infancy on cognitive function in adulthood: Swedish population based cohort study. British Medical Journal 328:1-5. Krokosz, A. And Z. Szweda-Lewandowska. 2005. Changes in the activity of acetylcholinesterase and Na,K- ATPase in human erythrocytes irradiated with X-rays. Cell and Molecular Biology Letters 10:471-478. Limoli, C.L., Giedzinski, E., Baure, J., Rola, R. And J.R. Fike. 2007. Redox changes induced in hippocampal precursor cells by heavy ion irradiation. Radiation and Environmental Biophysics 46:167-172. Mizumatsu, S., Monje, M.L., Morhardt, D.R., Rola, R., Palmer, T.D. and J.R. Fike. 2003. Extreme sensitivity of adult neurogenesis to low doses of X-irradiation. Cancer Research 63:4021-4027. Monje, M.L., Mizumatsu, S., Fike, J.R. and T.D. Palmer. 2002. Irradiation induces neural precursor-cell dysfunction. Nature Medicine 8:955-962. Monnier, M. and P. Krupp, 1962. Action of gamma radiation on electrical brain activity. In: Response of the Nervous System to Ionizing Radiation. (Haley, T. and Snider, R. Eds.) New York: Academic Press, pp. 607 – 619. Mullin, M.J., Hunt, W.A. and R.A. Harris. 1986. Ionizing radiation alters the properties of sodium channels in rat brain synaptosomes. Journal of Neurochemistry 47:489-495. Nelson, G.A. 2003. Fundamental space radiobiology. Gravitational and Space Biology Bulletin. 16:29-36. NSCOR. 2007. NASA Specialized Center of Research program project (NASA grant NNJ04HC90G) led by Loma Linda University with 5 collaborating insti-tutions. The author, G. Nelson, is the project principal investigator and unpublished observations reflect efforts of multiple project co-investigators. Ordy, J.M., Samorajski, T., Horrocks, L.A., Zeman, W. and H.J. Curtis. 1968. Changes in memory, electrophysiology, neurochemistry and neuronal ultrastructure after deuteron irradiation of the brain in C57B1-10 mice. Journal of Neurochemistry 15:1245- 1256. Pellmar, T.C., Schauer, D.A. and G.H. Zeman. 1990. Time- and dose-dependent changes in neuronal activity produced by X radiation in brain slices. Radiation Research 122:209-214. Pellmar, T.C. and D.L. Lepinski. 1993. Gamma radiation (5-10 Gy) impairs neuronal function in the guinea pig hippocampus. Radiation Research 136:255-261. Pyapali, G.K., Sik, A., Penttonen, M., Buzaki, G. and D.A. Turner. 1998. Dendritic properties of hippocampal CA1 pyramidal neurons in the rat: Intracellular staining in vivo and in vitro. Journal of Comparative Neurology 391:335–352. Raber, J., Rola, R., LeFevour, A., Morhardt, D., Curley, J., Mizumatsu, S., VandenBerg, S.R. and J.R. Fike. Radiation-induced cognitive impairments are associated with changes in indicators of hippocampal neurogenesis. Radiation Research 162:39-47. Rabin, B.M., Joseph, J.A. and B. Shukitt-Hale. 2004. Heavy particle irradiation, neurochemistry and behavior: thresholds, dose-response curves and recovery of function. Advances in Space Research 33:1330-1333. Rola, R., Raber, J., Rizk, A., Otsuka, S., VandenBerg, S.R., Morhardt, D.R. and J.R. Fike. 2004. Radiation- induced impairment of hippocampal neurogenesis is associated with cognitive deficits in young mice. Experimental Neurology 188:316-30. Ron, E., Modan, B., Floro, S., Harkedar, I. and R. Gurewitz. 1982. Mental function following scalp irradiation during childhood. American Journal of Epi- demiology 116:149-60. Schultheiss, T.E., Kun, L.E., Ang, K.K., and L.C. Stephens. 1995. Radiation response of the central nervous system. Internationl Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology and Physics 31:1093 – 1112. Shukitt-Hale, B., Casadesus, G., McEwen, J.J., Rabin, B.M. and J.A. Joseph. 2000. Spatial learning and memory deficits induced by exposure to iron-56-particle radiation. Radiation Research 154:28-33. The Hippocampus Book. 2007. (Andersen, P., Morris, R., Amaral, D., Bliss, T. O’Keefe, J., Eds.) Oxford: Oxford University Press. Todd, D.G. and R.B. Mikkelsen. 1994. Ionizing radiation induces a transient increase in cytosolic free [Ca2+ ] in human epithelial tumor cells. Cancer Research 54:5224- 5230. Tofilon, P.J. and J.R. Fike. 2000. The radioresponse of the central nervous system: A dynamic process. Radiation Research 153: 357 – 370.
  • 6. G.A. Nelson — Neurological Effects of Space Radiation 38 Gravitational and Space Biology 22(2) September 2009 Vazquez, M.E. and E. Kirk. 2000. In vitro neurotoxic effects of 1 GeV/n iron particles assessed in retinal explants. Advances in Space Research 25: 2041-2049. Vlkolinský, R., Krucker, T., Smith, A.L., Lamp, T.C., Nelson, G.A. and A. Obenaus. 2007. Effects of lipopolysaccharide on 56 Fe-particle radiation-induced impair-ment of synaptic plasticity in the mouse hippocampus. Radiation Research 168:462-470. Wong, C.S., and A.J. Van der Kogel. 2004. Mechanisms of radiation injury to the central nervous system: implications for neuroprotection. Molecular Interventions 4:273-284. Ziegler, C. and J.M. Wessels. 1998. Investigation of lipid peroxidation in liposomes induced by heavy ion irradiation. Radiation and Environmental Biophysics 37:95-100.