2. Player 1
o Area at risk: Adductor muscles
o Evolution: Ankle mobility maintained.
o Planned action: Continue follow-up by Coach Mathieu
3. Player 1
o Evolution: Overall slight increased hip adductor strength (HAS) and
decreased pain perception.
o Planned action: Continue follow-up by Coach Mathieu
4. Player 2
o Area at risk: Iliopsoas and rectus femoris muscle
o Evolution: Ankle mobility decreased in right ankle
o Planned action: Further assessment and treatment by Coach Mathieu
5. Player 2
o Evolution: Decreased hip adduction strength with increased pain on both
sides.
o Planned action: Further assessment and treatment by Coach Mathieu
6. Player 6
o Area at risk: Back, Iliopsoas, rectus femoris, adductor muscles and left
ankle
o Evolution: No change in ankle mobility
o Planned action: Follow-up by Coach Mathieu
7. Player 6
o Evolution: Hip adduction strength increased . Pain remained.
o Planned action: Continue treatment/monitoring by Coach Mathieu
8. Player 3
o Area at risk: Lower back + right hamstrings (neurologic factor involved)
o Evolution: Maintained ankle mobility left, restored right
o Planned action: Follow-up by Coach Mathieu
9. Player 3
o Evolution: Slight increase in hip adduction strength, major decrease to
0/10 in pain perception.
o Planned action: Follow-up by Coach Mathieu
10. Player 4
o Area at risk: Lower back muscles, Iliopsoas, rectus femoris, Abd and
Adductors + Body weight
o Evolution: Restored ankle mobility
11. Player 4
o Evolution: Increased hip adduction strength with decreased pain
perception
o Planned action: Further assessment and treatment by Coach
Mathieu
12. Player 5
o Area at risk: Lower back, rectus femoris and adductors
o Evolution: Maintained ankle mobility
13. Player 5
o Evolution: Slightly fluctuating hip adduction strength. Pain score swings
around 2-3. This is nothing to worry about.
o Planned action: Follow-up by Coach Mathieu
14. Conclusion
Taken into account the limited data base, the following
conclusions can be drawn:
o Following players need extra care:
o Player – Neurological factor in right hamstring (Medical imaging approval in
process)
o Player – R ankle + Adductors
o Player– Adductor right
o Player – Adductors
o Following players have decreased knee to wall measurements and need
further joint mobility assessment to rule out possible arthrogenic problems:
o Player
15. Conclusion
o Following players have a positive evolution in their risk of groin area
injuries:
o Player
o Player
o Player
o Following players have a negative evolution in their risk of groin area
injuries and should be monitored closely:
o /
o Planned action: Further assessment by Coach Mathieu
16. Conclusion
In conclusion
o Football is a high maintenance sport
o Frequent screening sessions allow the staff to create an atmosphere in
which the player is comfortable to mention all types of issues
(biopsychosocial).
o This is often important information in order to adapt and monitor injury
prevention sessions, secondary and tertiary prevention.
o This information is also of importance to the head coach and physical coach
in order to individualize trainings.
In light of these conclusions I would advice to organize a weekly
screening moment in order to profit maximally from it’s
advantages
