The most reliable and effective way to make the availability of nutrients coincide with plant requirements is by controlling their release into the soil solution, using controlled release fertilizers. This is accomplished by encapsulating fertilizer granules in a polymeric coating, employing Haifa’s Multicote technology.
2. Controlled-Release Fertilizers
Multicote® Agri for agriculture
Multicote® Turf for turf and lawns
Multicote® for nurseries and ornamentals
Longevity of the nutrients release : 2, 4, 6, 8, 12 or 16 months long.
It depends on the soil temperature (default = 21oC)
The coated material left behind is biodegraded.
3. Temperature: leading factor for
Nutrition problems: Temperature
Growth
CRF nutrients
release
In moisty soils temperature is around 25-30° C
4. Multicote Agri
MC Agri is a line of controlled-release NPK blends for
agricultural applications.
MC Agri products combine controlled-release nutrients
and fast-acting ingredients.
9. Multicote Technology
Designed to release plant nutrients throughout the
growth season
Require single, pre-plant application
Made of granular fertilizers encapsulated in a polymer
resin coating.
10.
11. Multicote Agri “The Art of blending”
The right formula (N-P-K)
The right longevity (temp., crop cycle)
Crop needs by stages
13. Nutrients Fate
A- Nutrients uptake = absorbed from the plants
during the crop cycle; the nutrients must be
available
B- Nutrients removal = removed with the harvested
portion of the plants
C- losses = leaching, volatilization, denitrification
immobilization
14.
15. What about the mechanisms of N
losses???
Leaching of nitrates due to heavy rainfall
Denitrification and gaseous nitrogen due soil
humidity and anaerobial soil conditions
Volatilization of Urea
Which % of my nitrogen
getting lost????
17. Leaching
World wide: losses of nitrate leaching or de-nitrification
are the largest and may be in order of many tens of %
under extreme conditions!
19. Volatilization
Volalilization of ammonia: especially for urea or
ammonium based fertilizers, overall if not incorporated
and when in contact with soils having basic pH
20. Urea losses!!!
Urea applied at soil surface: more than 50% can be
volatilized as NH3
NH3 cumulative losses (average):
Polymer Coated urea: 3-4% of applied N
Bands incorporated : 5-25% of applied N (related to depht and
soil moisture)
Broadcast (incorporated): 15-35% of applied N
Broadcast: up to 85% of applied N
Rochette et al. Agricolture and Agri-food, Soils and Crop R
23. Today Urea Use Efficiency: 50%
Worldwide:
Each % point of efficiency increase
=
1 million tons less required by the market
=
Maybe we can improve the technology in
order to maximize the efficiency
25. Let’s talk about productivity!
Only the 40% of the applied fertilizer is used by the
plants???
The research is focusing in increasing the efficiency of
the existing fertilizers and not discovering new molecules
Doubling the efficiency of the fertilizer means reduction
of the applied fertilizer 50% !
MultiCote pioneering the future!!!
26. Technology in productivity
Slow release fertilizers (inhibitors..)
Urease inhibitor
Nitrosomonas and Nitrobacter inhibitors
Sulphur Coated Fertilizers (SCU)
Methylene Urea (MU)
Urea Formaldeyde (UF)
CDU
IBDU
Control release fertilizers (Polymer coated..)
Fertigation
30. Advantages
The right formula (N-P-K)
The right longevity (temp., crop cycle)
Crop needs by stages
Minimize losses
Minimize the rate applied compared to farmer practice
Higher Nutrient Use Efficiency (N.U.E)
Looks simple, but
performs
sophisticatedly!
35. Nutrients Fate
A- Nutrients uptake = absorbed from the plants
during the crop cycle; the nutrients must be
available
B- Nutrients removal = removed with the harvested
portion of the plants
C- losses = leaching, volatilization, denitrification
immobilization (Control release nutrition minimize
losses, enhancing the NUE)
38. N adsorbed during the
whole vegetative cycle
N removed trough the
harvest
Removal ≠ Uptake
Precise dosing: real removal
Growing degree units
CumulativeNutrientsUptake(100%)
Removal Uptake
Precise
timing
Precise
product
Precise
location
Precise
dosing
The tools: Precise Dosing
39. Precise dosing: real removal
An example of the difference between
Removal and Uptake:
N appl
(kg/ha)
Prot % N in prot Production
(kg/ha)
Prot %
(kg/ha)
N
removed
(kg/ha)
141 7,12 1,14 12.000 856 137
203 7,5 1,2 12.500 938 150
Data from corn trials, Michigan State University - 2005
Precise
timing
Precise
product
Precise
location
Precise
dosing
The tools: Precise Dosing
Kg of N Removed : kg of Proteins / 6,25
40. Farmer Practice has no more to be the
standard: the new one has to be
the Removal!
Precise
timing
Precise
product
Precise
location
Precise
dosing
The tools: Precise Dosing
41. What has to be taken in account for plants feeding:
- Removed
- Fertilizer inefficiency / losses
From 5% (CRF) to 50% (Urea)
Depending on application time and location
Nutrition problems: Precise Rate
42. Multicote® Agri General recommendations
Application rate
%of Farmer Practice
Cash crops in open field N P K
light soil Multicote Agri 50-60 60-80 50-70
heavy soil 60-80 70-80 70-80
Protected crops
light soil Multicote Agri 50-60 60-70 50
heavy soil 60-70 70 60
Fruit trees
Planting Multicote Agri 50-60 80 80
Established trees 50-60 80 80
The recommendations should be considered as a general guide only. Actual application rates
and percentage of coated nutrients may be up to 10% more or 10% less than the values given
in the table.
46. Multicote® Agri General recommendations
Application rate
%of Farmer Practice
Cash crops in open field N P K
light soil Multicote Agri 50-60 60-80 50-70
heavy soil 60-80 70-80 70-80
Protected crops
light soil Multicote Agri 50-60 60-70 50
heavy soil 60-70 70 60
Fruit trees
Planting Multicote Agri 50-60 80 80
Established trees 50-60 80 80
The recommendations should be considered as a general guide only. Actual application rates
and percentage of coated nutrients may be up to 10% more or 10% less than the values given
in the table.
48. Question:
How can CRF be distributes in efficient way?
Nutrition problems: Precise Placement
49. Field crops (cereals): is it still feasible to push
further the NUE ?
s
Precise
Product
Precise
timing
Precise
location
The ratio Coated/uncoated plays a key role
The other tools: Precise product
The fertilizer is distributed with
the seed
Top efficiency for grass-like crops
50. Nutrition problems: Ions migration
-
+
++
+
+
-
-
-
-
-
Plants stimulate ions
migration
If ion’s speed is slower than
plant demand
nutrition deficiency
52. Depth dt/ha 1 2 3
broadc. 120 a
10 130 b
20 140 c
Location has a great influence in the CRF and uncoated
fertilizers too: better NUE
The results: BANDING enhances the longevity of the
fertilizers
Corn grain data on a trial made in 2006 – Italy
The other tools: Precise product
54. Averagegrainyielddt/ha
Spring Barley – Italy, 2009 (100 days crop cycle)
- Yield vs N level.
- Seed row appl. (seed with fertilizer)
- Urea vs Organic –mineral
- Organic-mineral 1:1
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
Urea (90) Urea (120) Urea (60) Urea (30)
Best
efficiency
High Ec effect
Low dose effect
The other tools: Precise product
CRF blends (C/UC) will have better performances
55. CRF blends …
- Permit to create a nutrient stock in the immediate rootzone
- Reduce the energy required by the plant to find nutrients into
the soil (uptake – intake; see Nardi et al.)
- Minimize losses
- Optimize plant phisiology and its productive response
So…
It’s better to decide by ourself WHEN plants need fertilizer
(fertigation)
or Let the plants do decide WHEN they need fertilizer…?
Conclusions
57. Multicote® Agri for Greenhouse Tomatoes
Treatments
Greenhouse-grown tomatoes cv azera-189, HaBesor Farm, Israel
Light soil !
Applicationkg/haFertilizerTreatment
K2OP2O5N
Nutrigation at 2-days intervals840240660LiquidFarmer’s practice
Base-dressing, irrigation
schedule same as in
Farmers practice
429132264Multicote Agri 16-8-26
(90-0-100% coated)
Longevity: 6 months
Multicote® Agri 50%
702216432Multicote® Agri 65%
58. Multicote® Agri for Greenhouse Tomatoes
Results
Mean fruit size
(g)
Marketable
yield (T/ha)
Total yield
(T/ha)
166 a111.23 a126.72 aFarmer’s Practice
173 b109.97 a124.89 aMulticote® Agri 50%
171 b126.83 b140.16 bMulticote® Agri 65%
59. Multicote® Agri for Greenhouse
Tomatoes
90
95
100
105
110
115
120
125
130
Farmer's practice Multicote Agri 50% Multicote Agri 65%
Total yield (ton/ha)
60. Multicote® Agri for Greenhouse
Tomatoes
Multicote Agri:
• Higher yield with 65% of Farmer
Practice rate
• Similar yield with 50% of Farmers
Practice rate
• Larger fruits at both Multicote Agri
treatments
MC Agri
61. Trial in Cudgen, Australia (NSW), 2005
Crop: Sweet potato cv Beaureguard
kg/ha
FertilizerTreatment
K2OP2O5N
200128112Granular NPK fertilizersFarmer practice
175112102
Multicote Agri 6M
14.5-16-25
61-0-70% coated
Multicote Agri Hi (90%)
1459384Multicote Agri Med (75%)
1288274Multicote Agri Lo (65%)
Application method
Farmers practice: base dressing + 2 side dressing applications
Multicote® Agri: base-dressing, fertilizer was incorporated to the soil at bed
formation before planting
Multicote® Agri for Sweet Potatoes
62. Results
Income
Total yield
Ton/ha
Tuber size
distribution (%)
Treatment
US$/haLMS
9,02028.715166Farmer practice
16,61036.98319Multicote Agri Hi (90%)
16,97535.393211Multicote Agri Med (75%)
12,58032.8151812Multicote Agri Lo (65%)
Multicote® Agri for Sweet Potatoes
63. Yields
(ton/ha)
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
Farmer's practice MC Agri Hi MC Agri Med MC Agri Lo
0
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
12000
14000
16000
18000
Total Small Medium Income
Results
Multicote® Agri for Sweet Potatoes
Income
($US/ha)
64. Multicote® Agri for Sweet Potatoes
Multicote Agri:
Highest yield were obtained with Multicote Agri at 90%
(Hi) of the Farmer Practice rate.
However, the highest income were obtained with
Multicote Agri at 75% (Med) of Farmer Practice rate.
66. Results
Multicote® Agri for Onion
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
T1 T2 T3 T4 T5 T6 (PF)
0
5000
10000
15000
20000
25000
30000
35000
40000
45000
50000
Jumbo Big Medium Small Net benefit
Net
income
($/ha)
Yields
(ton/ha)
67. Multicote Agri :
• Higher yields even with 50% N and K rates
• Difference in % coating affect the yield quantity and quality.
• Optimization of the economical results.
Multicote® Agri for Onion
68. Field Trial: Guanjuato, Mexico, 2006 (Corn)
N % of grower’s
practice
Kg/ha
N-P2O5-K2O
%
coated material
100260-76-60-
Grower’s
practice–
2 applications
90234-40-27-Liquid fertilizer
70182-70-4230-0-30
Multicote Agri –
base dressing only
70. Field Trial: South France, 2003
N % of grower’s
practice
N kg/ha
at 10 leaves
at 6-8
leaves
At sowing
100%58170
68 kg/ha
from DAP
(in an NPK
blend
Urea – full rate
80%0170
Urea – reduced
rate
80%0170
Urea +
nitrification inhibitor
80%0170Multicote Agri™
100%58170Urea – full rate
Conclusion: CoteN™ is superior to nitrification inhibitors
71. Field Trial: South France, 2003
Yield (ton/ha)
12
12.5
13
13.5
14
14.5
15
15.5
16
Urea - full rate Urea - reduced
rate
Urea + nitrification
inhibitor
CoteN
Conclusion: Multicote™ is superior to nitrification inhibitors
72. Field Trial: South France, 2003
Conclusion: Multicote Agri™ is superior to
nitrification inhibitors:
Reduction of N rate resulted in decreased
yields. Addition of nitrification inhibitor could
not make up for this reduction.
Multicote Agri did!
73. Multicote® Agri General recommendations
Application rate
%of Farmer Practice
Cash crops in open field N P K
light soil Multicote Agri 50-60 60-80 50-70
heavy soil 60-80 70-80 70-80
Protected crops
light soil Multicote Agri 50-60 60-70 50
heavy soil 60-70 70 60
Fruit trees
Planting Multicote Agri 50-60 80 80
Established trees 50-60 80 80
The recommendations should be considered as a general guide only. Actual application rates
and percentage of coated nutrients may be up to 10% more or 10% less than the values given
in the table.
77. Where to apply?
• On light soils-fertilizers leaching
• In rainy areas- heavy soils
• Wherever nitrogen application is limited -
environmental regulations
• For crops with a shallow root system
• For crops with high nutritional requirements
• In cases where mid-season application is not
feasible
79. Multicote Agri fertilizers
Applied only once!!!
Less application cost (tractors, gasoline, mechanical
damages)
30-50% less applied product with higher NUE
Blending we can make the suitable N-P-K formula
Less labor
Less logistic
No compaction of the soil
No ruined lines (5% losses)
Flexibility in the entrance to the field
Less environmental pollution
PEACE OF MIND !!!!!!