1. “STUDY OF PORT PERFORMANCE IN INDIA:
- MAJOR PORTS & MINOR PORTS”
2. OUTLINE OF THE PRESENTATION
OBJECTIVE OF THE REPORT.
INTRODUCTION TO INDIAN PORT
SECTOR.
INDIAN PORT PERFORMANCE –
ANALYSIS AND. INTERPRETATION.
FINDINGS AND CONCLUSION.
3. OBJECTIVE OF THE STUDY
The main objectives of this study are: -
To analyze the efficiency of Major and Minor
Ports in the country.
To identify the factors affecting the Performance
of the Major and Minor Ports.
4. PORT
The United Nations Conference on Trade and
Development (UNCTAD) defines seaports as - interfaces
between several modes of transport and thus, they are
centres for combined transport. Furthermore, they are
multi-functional markets and industrial areas, where
goods are not only in transit but are also sorted,
manufactured and distributed. As a matter of fact,
seaports are multi-dimensional systems, which must be
integrated within logistic chains to properly fulfil their
functions.
An efficient seaport therefore, requires, besides
infrastructure, superstructure and equipment, adequate
connections to other transport modes, a motivated
management and sufficiently qualified employees”.
5. INDIAN PORT SECTOR
Classified as Major or Minor Ports on the basis of
ownership.
The Government of India wholly owns the 13 Major
Ports while out of around 200 Minor Ports, most are
owned and governed by the respective State
Maritime Boards while some are owned by the
Private players which are governed by the respective
State Maritime Boards.
From these 13 Major Ports, 12 ports are governed by
the Major Port Trust Act and 1 port viz. Ennore Port
Limited is administered by the provisions of
Companies Act.
6. CONT....
Accounts for around 95% of volume and 70%
by value of the country’s overall international
trade.
7. CONT....
Like any other industry its activities are
influenced by:
External Environment: Social, political,
economic and technological.
Task Environment: Importers, exporters,
clearing and forwarding agents and other users
of port.
Competitive Environment: Other ports and
other modes of transport.
Public Environment: Government and other
public bodies.
8. STRENGTHS
High growth
High market Share
Financial means available
Some Ports located in strategic location
9. WEAKNESSES
Old infrastructure
Low drafts
Old and inefficient cargo handling systems
Poor hinterland connections
Rigid institutional frame work
High tariffs
Poor quality of services / business attitude
Overstaffing
Lack of capacity
Lack of extension possibilities
10. OPPORTUNITIES
Introduce competition
Huge Indian markets, and land locked countries
in the North
Improve organization: training, IT, downsizing
Port reform – more autonomy
PPP other than BOT
Invest in infrastructure, lower cost for port users
Invest in total transport chain
12. THE AGENDA FOR THE PORTS
Develop Two New Major Ports one each on east
and west coasts.
Full mechanization of cargo handling and
movement.
Major Ports to have draft of not less than 14
metres and hub ports 17 metres.
Identification and implementation of projects for
rail, road and inland waterway connectivity to
ports.
Development of two hub ports on each of the
West and the East coasts
13. POLICY MEASURES
New Land Policy for Major Ports.
New Policy on captive berths.
New Policy on dredging.
Shifting of transshipment of Indian containers
from foreign ports to Indian ports.
Policy on co-operation and competition amongst
Indian Ports.
Establishing ‘Indian Ports Global’ for overseas
investments by Indian Ports.
14. PRIVATE SECTOR PARTICIPATION
Leasing out existing assets of the Port.
Construction/creation of additional assets, such as:
Construction and operation of container terminals.
Construction and operation of bulk, break bulk, multipurpose and
specialized cargo berths.
Warehousing, container freight stations, storage facilities and tank
farms.
Cranage/handling equipment.
Setting up of captive power plants.
Dry docking and vessel repair facilities.
Pilotage.
Captive facilities for port based industries.
Leasing of equipment for port handling and leasing of floating
crafts from the private sector.
15. PROBLEMS
The framework in vogue does not describe the
dimensions namely the Efficiency and the
Vessel’s Economy and their causality to enable
the port planners to be effective. It instead
suggests traditional strategic implementation
such as cost control, prices reduction, survival
on subsidies and grants and creation of assets
based on forecast. The approach should have
been market driven, and customer focused. It
aims at dealing with different variables instead
of identifying and managing the under lying
dimensions.
16. ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION
The volume of seaborne cargo traffic handled by
ports is mainly shaped by the levels and
changes in both the global and domestic activity.
Cargo traffic at India’s 12 major ports during
2012-13 at 545.79 million tonnes declined by
2.6% compared with 560.19 million tonnes
handled in 2011-12.
The year 2012-13 witnessed a drop in total
cargo traffic of 2.6% over the preceding year
and a shortfall with respect to the target set for
2012-13 by 9.2%.
17. CONTD....
Port Efficiency : -
Average Turn-Round Time (TRT)
Average Pre Berthing Detention Time (PBDT)
Average Output Per Ship Berth-day
18. AVERAGE TURN-ROUND TIME (TRT)
has improved significantly during the past
one and half decades for all the major ports.
Average TRT for all major ports improved
from 8.10 days in 1990-91 to 3.63 days in
2005-06. Thereafter the TRT has increased
steadily to 5.29 days in 2010-11. In 2011-12,
the average TRT declined to 4.56 days and
further to 3.94 days in 2012-13. The TRT
varied in a range between 1.64 days at
Cochin Port to 6.40 at Kandla.
19. Average Pre Berthing Detention Time
(PBDT)
The average overall pre berthing detention time
for all major ports has declined from 2.2 days in
1990-91 to 1.63 days in 2008-09. However, in
2009-10 and 2010-11, the average PBDT edged
up to 2.16 days and 2.32 days respectively. In
contrast, average PBDT on port account has
seen a sharper decline from 2.10 days in 1990-
91 to 0.50 day in 2010-11. Average PBDT on
port account remained same at 0.50 days in
2011-12 and 2012-13. Average PBDT on port
account was more than a day (2.05) at Kandla
during 2012-13.
20. Average Output Per Ship Berth-day
During the last 20 years this indicator has seen
a tremendous improvement. Average Output per
Ship-berth day has increased to almost four
times from 3,372 tonnes in 1990-91 to 13149
tonnes in 2012-13 for major ports. However,
average output per ship berth day is marked by
substantial variation across major ports ranging
from a high 26308 tonnes in case of JLN port to
a low of 2084 tonnes at Kolkata Dock System
during 2012-13. This variation reflects the type
of cargo being handled, level of mechanization
and labour practices
21. THE MAIN FACTORS THAT HAVE LED TO
INEFFICIENCIES IN THE INDIAN PORTS
Most major ports were originally designed to
handle specific categories of cargo.
Equipment utilisation is very poor both because
equipment is obsolete and poorly maintained.
Over staffing
Time consuming lengthy Documentary
procedures
Port access facilities and arrangements for
moving inbound and outbound cargo are
inadequate and unsatisfactory
22. CONT....
A land use plan was developed in most ports.
However, a clear vision on port planning and
phased development is lacking for some
ports
High BOF
‘Berthminded’ ports.
23. SUGGESTUONS
Enhance competitiveness
Increase capacity
Rejuvenate services
Strengthen its supply chain and optimize
resource utilization
Renovate infrastructure and facilities
Remove bureaucracy
Reduce cost
Create new customer base
24. CONT....
Improve port organisation.
Liberalisation
Decrease the revenue share in BOT
contracts in order to attract terminal
operators
25. CONCLUSION
The present needs are:
There should be an incentive to more
competition amongst the Major Ports.
Delegation of powers and responsibilities.
Autonomy in tariff setting and investing.
Fast decision making process.
Operational freedom.
Professionalism
26. CONT....
Apart from a few Major Ports, the financial
position of the rest of the Major Ports is very
good. Funds available for investments by
ports:
Over Rs 20.000 Cr in 2014.
Huge borrowing capacity over Rs 40.000 Cr in
2014.