Digital scholarship and identifiers - Geoffrey Bilder, CrossReff Share update – Elliott Shore, Association of Research Libraries Jisc Monitor update – Neil Jacobs, Jisc Infrastructure and services to track research activity – Daniel Hook, Digital Science Jisc and CNI conference, 6 July 2016

1. Tracking research and research systems
Chair: Catherine Grout, Jisc
06/07/2016
1

2. Introduction
Chair: Catherine Grout, Jisc
14/07/2016

3. Digital scholarship and identifiers
Geoffrey Builder, Crossref
14/07/2016

4. Share update
Elliot Shore,Association of Research Libraries
14/07/2016

5. SHARE Update
Jisc/CNI
International Advances in
Digital Scholarship
July 6, 2016
Elliott Shore
elliott@arl.org

6. Mission
SHARE is a higher education initiative whose mission is to
maximize research impact by making research widely
accessible, discoverable, and reusable. To fulfill this mission
SHARE is building a free, open data set about research
and scholarly activities across their life cycle.

7. Five System of Action Areas

8. ARL Framework

10. Open infrastructure for open access
OA advocacy & policy is more mature than OA
infrastructure & implementation
OA implementation infrastructure should be open
Metadata
Standards and identifiers
Code, platforms, and APIs

11. The future of open scholarship
“We find ourselves two decades into the transition of
research communication from a paper-based endeavor to a
web-based digital enterprise, and well into the transition of
the research process itself from a largely hidden activity
to one that becomes plainly visible on the global
network.”
Herbert Van de Sompel
“Reminiscing About 15 Years of Interoperability Efforts” (DLib Magazine, Nov./Dec. 2015)

12. “... the world’s repositories need some common application
programming interfaces (APIs). This is where SHARE is making
huge strides, by pulling together data sets from many of the
world’s most-used repositories, such as figshare. In turn,
SHARE’s aggregating of data sets can feed discovery of content
in sites that may not have the same exposure as figshare or
discovery of data from across disciplines. “
Mark Hahnel, figshare
Interoperability through APIs

13. 3Collaborators:
Association of American Universities; Association of Public and
Land-grant Universities; Center for Open Science

14. 117Number of SHARE Content Providers (June 2016)

15. 7.5 millionResearch Release Events

16. Percentage of research release events that include a “contributor’s
affiliation name” (i.e. institution) field
1.4

17. SHARE Notify providers by type

18. What we’ve learned
Variability and availability of metadata
Complexity of institutional policies & workflow
Power of community infrastructure
Open data for interoperability

19. The lifecycle approach
“All scholarly digital research objects—from data to analytical
pipelines—benefit from application of these [FAIR data]
principles, since all components of the research process must
be available to ensure transparency, reproducibility, and
reusability.”
Nature. Scientific Data Comment. Wilkinson, et al. “The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data
management and stewardship” March 15, 2016.

21. NotifyProviders ConsumersGather
Phase I: pipeline for normalized notifications

22. Phase II: Clean, enhance, link
Automation, e.g. subject tagging with machine learning
Expert human curation

23. SHARE Phase III
Integration
Systems and workflows
Teaching and learning

25. ARL Focal Areas Fall 2015

26. “I am energized by the new directions that ARL
is taking”

27. Committee on
Coherence at Scale in Higher Education

28. Questions?
Elliott Shore
elliott@arl.org

29. Jisc Monitor update
Neil Jacobs, Jisc
14/07/2016

30. Jisc tracking research and research systems
»The typical OA article lifecycle and Jisc services
»Outline of Jisc Monitor services
»Some data flows for Monitor Local, and flavour
»Some data flows for Monitor UK, and a flavour
»Timeline from now
14/07/2016 Title of presentation (Insert > Header & Footer > Slide > Footer > Apply to all) 30

31. OA through an article lifecycle
Title of presentation (Insert > Header & Footer > Slide > Footer > Apply to all)
Submission Acceptance Publication Use
SHERPA
JULIET
SHERPA
RoMEO
SHERPA
REF R&D:Beta
SHERPA
Fact
Monitor
UK R&D:Alpha
Jisc
collections
OpenDOAR
Publications
Router R&D:Alpha
Monitor
local R&D:Alpha
CORE
IRUS-UK
RIOXX
Guidance, consultancy, technical support, and OA good practice
Research
publication
lifecycle
Jisc
services
Report on
compliance
Deposit in
repository
Manage
costs
Check
compliance
Select
Journal
Maximise
impact
Record
impact Report

32. OA through an article lifecycle
Title of presentation (Insert > Header & Footer > Slide > Footer > Apply to all)
Submission Acceptance Publication Use
SHERPA
JULIET
SHERPA
RoMEO
SHERPA
REF R&D:Beta
SHERPA
Fact
Monitor
UK R&D:Alpha
Jisc
collections
OpenDOAR
Publications
Router R&D:Alpha
Monitor
local R&D:Alpha
CORE
IRUS-UK
RIOXX
Guidance, consultancy, technical support, and OA good practice
Research
publication
lifecycle
Jisc
services
Report on
compliance
Deposit in
repository
Manage
costs
Check
compliance
Select
Journal
Maximise
impact
Record
impact Report

33. OA through an article lifecycle
Title of presentation (Insert > Header & Footer > Slide > Footer > Apply to all)
Submission Acceptance Publication Use
SHERPA
JULIET
SHERPA
RoMEO
SHERPA
REF R&D:Beta
SHERPA
Fact
Monitor
UK R&D:Alpha
Jisc
collections
OpenDOAR
Publications
Router R&D:Alpha
Monitor
local R&D:Alpha
CORE
IRUS-UK
RIOXX
Guidance, consultancy, technical support, and OA good practice
Research
publication
lifecycle
Jisc
services
Report on
compliance
Deposit in
repository
Manage
costs
Check
compliance
Select
Journal
Maximise
impact
Record
impact Report

34. OA through an article lifecycle
Title of presentation (Insert > Header & Footer > Slide > Footer > Apply to all)
Submission Acceptance Publication Use
SHERPA
JULIET
SHERPA
RoMEO
SHERPA
REF R&D:Beta
SHERPA
Fact
Monitor
UK R&D:Alpha
Jisc
collections
OpenDOAR
Publications
Router R&D:Alpha
Monitor
local R&D:Alpha
CORE
IRUS-UK
RIOXX
Guidance, consultancy, technical support, and OA good practice
Research
publication
lifecycle
Jisc
services
Report on
compliance
Deposit in
repository
Manage
costs
Check
compliance
Select
Journal
Maximise
impact
Record
impact Report

35. Jisc Monitor:Two separate but integrated services
Monitor Local:
› Institutions can record and
report data relating to their OA
publications
– Costs (APCs)
– Policy compliance
– Status in workflow
› Cloud application, interfacing
with local and third party
services
Monitor UK:
» Shared application aggregating
and presenting data analytics
» Institutions and funders can
evaluate cost and compliance
data
» Working toward international
view
June 2016

36. Some data flows for Monitor Local
June 2016 36

37. Some data flows for Monitor Local
June 2016 37
Journal and funder
policy data
Repository /
article data
Article-level metadata
Journal-level
metadata
Correct and complete data, via API??
Licence data

38. A flavour of Jisc Monitor Local
June 2016 38

39. Some data flows for Monitor UK
June 2016 39
Monitor UK
Monitor Local
Lantern / OA Gauge
JiscCollections
Other university systems
/ spreadsheets / etc
Research funders

40. A flavour of Jisc Monitor UK / 1
June 2016 40

41. A flavour of Jisc Monitor UK / 2
June 2016 41

42. Timeline from now
14/07/2016 Title of presentation (Insert > Header & Footer > Slide > Footer > Apply to all) 42
Pilot
Handover
Live
To July
From August
From September
23 pilot universities
From Sero et al, to in-house
Jisc team
Live for pilot universities,
phased release for others

43. Find out more…
29.09.2014
43
Thanks for listening.
Neil Jacobs, Jisc
Neil.Jacobs@jisc.ac.uk
@njneilj
Except where otherwise noted, this
work is licensed under CC-BY-NC-ND

44. Infrastructure and services to track
research activity
Daniel Hook, Digital Science
14/07/2016

45. Infrastructure and services to
track research activity
Daniel W. Hook
Jisc / CNI Conference, Oxford
7th July 2016

46. Four forces driving academic
behaviour
Research: enabling
technology
Research:
collaboration /
internationalism
Government:
Social pressure
& accountability
Institutions:
Professionalisation
of research
management

47. How do we locate “research
event”?

48. How do we locate “research
event”?

49. Isn’t funding also part of
“location”?

50. What about Impact?

51. What else could we be
tracking?
Pre-1995 Circa 2005 Circa 2015

52. University of Cambridge
http://dx.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.1507607

53. Research Data Mechanics

54. Research Data Mechanics

55. Research Data Mechanics

56. Research Data Mechanics

57. Understanding collaboration

58. Research Data Mechanics & Open
DataResearch Data Mechanics of the type that we’ve described is only possible if
1. People (researchers and administrators) capture data systematically –
this means at the point of production wherever possible
2. Identifiers are assigned proactively –
again, wherever possible at the point of production
3. Data are made openly available wherever reasonable (modulo ethics etc)
while its nice to have publishers and others do this for you, it’s also possib
be active in this, e.g. VIVO, Profiles RNS, Dryad, Figshare etc.
4. Ideally, data are made available in structured open APIs.

59. Thank you
d.hook@digital-science.com

60. Tracking research and research systems06/07/2016
60