The document discusses several networking concepts:
- Classless Inter-Domain Routing (CIDR) allows ISPs to allocate blocks of IP addresses to organizations in a more efficient manner than previous methods.
- Network Address Translation (NAT) allows a local network to use private IP address ranges behind a NAT-enabled router that maps the private addresses to a single public IP address for communication with external networks.
- Subnetting and Variable Length Subnet Masking (VLSM) allow networks to be divided into subnets to better utilize limited IP address blocks and assign addresses based on subnet needs.
- Supernetting combines multiple classful network blocks into larger supernets to more efficiently use address space.
31. Classless Inter-Domain Routing (CIDR)
• Basically the method that ISPs (Internet Service
Providers) use to allocate an amount of
addresses to a company, a home
• Ex : 192.168.10.32/28
• The slash notation (/) means how many bits are
turned on (1s)
34. IP Address Classes Exercise
Address Class Network Host
10.2.1.1
128.63.2.100
201.222.5.64
192.6.141.2
130.113.64.16
256.241.201.10
35. IP Address Classes Exercise Answers
Address Class Network Host
10.2.1.1
128.63.2.100
201.222.5.64
192.6.141.2
130.113.64.16
256.241.201.10
A
B
C
C
B
Nonexistent
10.0.0.0
128.63.0.0
201.222.5.0
192.6.141.0
130.113.0.0
0.2.1.1
0.0.2.100
0.0.0.64
0.0.0.2
0.0.64.16
71. VLSM(Variable Length Subnet Mask)
• VLSM extends classic subnetting.
• VLSM is a process of breaking down subnets
into the smaller subnets, according to the
need of individual networks.
72. VLSM
An organization with a class C address and
needs to have 5 subnets with the following
number of hosts: 60, 60, 60, 30, 30.
The site cannot use a subnet mask with only 2
bits in the subnet section because this allows
only 4 subnetworks each 62.
Nor can the site use a subnet mask with 3 bits in
the subnet section because this allows 8
subnetworks each with 30 hosts.
73. VLSM
The router uses 2 different masks, one
applied after the other.
It first uses the masks with 26 1s(11111111
11111111 11111111 11000000 or
255.255.255.192) to divide the network into
4 subnets.
Then it applies the mask with 27 1s
(11111111 11111111 11111111
11100000 or 255.255.255.224) to one of the
subnets to divide it into two smaller subnets.
76. • If an ISP has a 200.1.1.0 Network, he wants to
give assign to 5 customers who need 20, 12, 6,
25, 18 hosts.
– What should the subnet mask be?
– What is the address range in each subnet?
– What should the routing table entries be?
– Can it be done efficiently to conserve IP
addresses?
Question
79. Supernetting
• Supernets are the opposite of Subnets in that
they combine multiple Class C networks into
blocks rather than dividing them into segments.
• When Subnetting, we borrow bits from the Host
ID portion, which increases the number of bits
used for the Network ID portion.
• With Supernetting we do exactly the opposite,
meaning we take the bits from the Network ID
portion and give them to the Host ID portion
80. Supernet Masks
A supernet mask is the reverse of the subnet
mask.
In a supernet mask, we change some 1s in
the netid section to 0s.
81. Example
• With the supernet mask of 255.255.252.0 we
can have 4 class C address combined into one
supernetwork.
• If we choose the first address to be X.Y.32.0, the
other three addresses are X.Y.33.0, X.Y.34.0, and
X.Y.35.0.
• Whenever the router receives a packet, it
applies the supernet mask to the destination
address and compares the result to the lowest
address. If the result and the lowest address are
the same, the packet belongs to the supernet.
82.
83.
84. NAT: network address translation
10.0.0.1
10.0.0.2
10.0.0.3
10.0.0.4
138.76.29.7
local network
(e.g., home network)
10.0.0/24
rest of
Internet
datagrams with source or
destination in this network
have 10.0.0/24 address for
source, destination (as usual)
all datagrams leaving
local
network have same
single source NAT IP
address:
138.76.29.7,different
85. motivation: local network uses just one IP
address as far as outside world is concerned:
– range of addresses not needed from ISP: just one
IP address for all devices
– can change addresses of devices in local network
without notifying outside world
– can change ISP without changing addresses of
devices in local network
– devices inside local net not explicitly addressable,
visible by outside world (a security plus)
NAT: network address translation
86. implementation: NAT router must:
– outgoing datagrams: replace (source IP address, port #)
of every outgoing datagram to (NAT IP address, new port
#)
– remember (in NAT translation table) every (source IP
address, port #) to (NAT IP address, new port #)
translation pair
– incoming datagrams: replace (NAT IP address, new port
#) in dest fields of every incoming datagram with
corresponding (source IP address, port #) stored in NAT
table
NAT: network address translation
87. 10.0.0.1
10.0.0.2
10.0.0.3
S: 10.0.0.1, 3345
D: 128.119.40.186, 80
1
10.0.0.4
138.76.29.7
1: host 10.0.0.1
sends datagram to
128.119.40.186, 80
NAT translation table
WAN side addr LAN side addr
138.76.29.7, 5001 10.0.0.1, 3345
…… ……
S: 128.119.40.186, 80
D: 10.0.0.1, 3345
4
S: 138.76.29.7, 5001
D: 128.119.40.186, 802
2: NAT router
changes datagram
source addr from
10.0.0.1, 3345 to
138.76.29.7, 5001,
updates table
S: 128.119.40.186, 80
D: 138.76.29.7, 5001 3
3: reply arrives
dest. address:
138.76.29.7, 5001
4: NAT router
changes datagram
dest addr from
138.76.29.7, 5001 to 10.0.0.1, 3345
NAT: network address translation
88.
89.
90.
91.
92. IGMP(Internet Group Management
Protocol)
• IGMP is a protocol that manages group
membership.
• The IGMP protocol gives the multicast routers
information about the membership status of
hosts (routers) connected to the network.
96. • aggregate routers into
regions, “autonomous
systems” (AS)
• routers in same AS run
same routing protocol
– “intra-AS” routing
protocol
– routers in different AS
can run different intra-
AS routing protocol
gateway router:
• at “edge” of its own AS
• has link to router in
another AS
Hierarchical routing
98. Inter-AS tasks
suppose router in AS1
receives datagram
destined outside of AS1:
router should forward
packet to gateway
router, but which one?
AS1 must:
1. learn which dests are
reachable through AS2,
which through AS3
2. propagate this
reachability info to all
routers in AS1
job of inter-AS routing!
AS3
AS2
3b
3c
3a
AS1
1c
1a
1d
1b
2a
2c
2b
other
networks
other
networks
99. Intra-AS Routing
also known as interior gateway protocols (IGP)
most common intra-AS routing protocols:
RIP: Routing Information Protocol
OSPF: Open Shortest Path First
IGRP: Interior Gateway Routing Protocol (Cisco
proprietary)
100. OSPF (Open Shortest Path First)
• “open”: publicly available
• uses link state algorithm
– route computation using Dijkstra’s algorithm
• OSPF advertisement carries one entry per
neighbor
• advertisements flooded to entire AS
– carried in OSPF messages directly over IP
101. OSPF “advanced” features (not in RIP)
• security: all OSPF messages authenticated (to
prevent malicious intrusion)
• multiple same-cost paths allowed (only one
path in RIP)
• for each link, multiple cost metrics for
different TOS(Type Of Service)
• integrated uni- and multicast support
• hierarchical OSPF in large domains.
102. Internet inter-AS routing: BGP
• BGP (Border Gateway Protocol): the de facto
inter-domain routing protocol
– “glue that holds the Internet together”
• BGP provides each AS a means to:
– eBGP: obtain subnet reachability information from
neighboring ASs.
– iBGP: propagate reachability information to all AS-
internal routers.
– determine “good” routes to other networks based
on reachability information and policy.
• allows subnet to advertise its existence to rest
of Internet: “I am here”
103. BGP basics
• when AS3 advertises a prefix to AS1:
– AS3 promises it will forward datagrams towards that prefix
– AS3 can aggregate prefixes in its advertisement
AS3
AS2
3b
3c
3a
AS1
1c
1a
1d
1b
2a
2c
2b
other
networks
other
networks
BGP session: two BGP routers (“peers”) exchange BGP
messages:
advertising paths to different destination network
exchanged over semi-permanent TCP connections
BGP
message
104. BGP basics: distributing path information
AS3
AS2
3b
3a
AS1
1c
1a
1d
1b
2a
2c
2b
other
networks
other
networks
using eBGP session between 3a and 1c, AS3 sends prefix
reachability info to AS1.
1c can then use iBGP do distribute new prefix info to all routers in AS1
1b can then re-advertise new reachability info to AS2 over 1b-to-2a
eBGP session
when router learns of new prefix, it creates entry for prefix in
its forwarding table.
eBGP session
iBGP session
105. IPv6: motivation
• initial motivation: 32-bit address space soon
to be completely allocated.
• additional motivation:
– header format helps speed processing/forwarding
– header changes to facilitate QoS
IPv6 datagram format:
– fixed-length 40 byte header
– no fragmentation allowed
106. IPv6 datagram format
priority: identify priority among datagrams in flow
flow Label: identify datagrams in same “flow.”
(concept of“flow” not well defined).
next header: identify upper layer protocol for data
data
destination address
(128 bits)
source address
(128 bits)
payload len next hdr hop limit
flow labelpriver
32 bits
107. Other changes from IPv4
• checksum: removed entirely to reduce
processing time at each hop
• options: allowed, but outside of header,
indicated by “Next Header” field
• ICMPv6: new version of ICMP
– additional message types, e.g. “Packet Too Big
108. Transition from IPv4 to IPv6
• not all routers can be upgraded simultaneously
– no “flag days”
– how will network operate with mixed IPv4 and IPv6
routers?
• tunneling: IPv6 datagram carried as payload in
IPv4 datagram among IPv4 routers
IPv4 source, dest addr
IPv4 header fields
IPv4 datagram
IPv6 datagram
IPv4 payload
UDP/TCP payload
IPv6 source dest addr
IPv6 header fields
110. flow: X
src: A
dest: F
data
A-to-B:
IPv6
Flow: X
Src: A
Dest: F
data
src:B
dest: E
B-to-C:
IPv6 inside
IPv4
E-to-F:
IPv6
flow: X
src: A
dest: F
data
B-to-C:
IPv6 inside
IPv4
Flow: X
Src: A
Dest: F
data
src:B
dest: E
physical view:
A B
IPv6 IPv6
E
IPv6 IPv6
FC D
logical view:
IPv4 tunnel
connecting IPv6 routers
E
IPv6 IPv6
FA B
IPv6 IPv6
Tunneling
IPv4 IPv4
111. IPv6: adoption
• US National Institutes of Standards estimate
[2013]:
– ~3% of industry IP routers
– ~11% of US gov’t routers
• Long (long!) time for deployment, use
– 20 years and counting!
– think of application-level changes in last 20 years:
WWW, Facebook, …
– Why?