9. Group is a management tool
• Group content together following a specific set of rules
AWESOME
10. Group is a management tool
• Group content together following a specific set of rules
• Grant users permissions for a small section of the site
AWESOME
11. Group is a management tool
• Group content together following a specific set of rules
• Grant users permissions for a small section of the site
• Control access to specific pieces of content
AWESOME
15. No needless bashing
(It’s bad karma)
• It repurposes existing entities
• Its groups can overrule configuration (hence: organic)
• All of its magic is based on who has what fields
• The user experience wasn’t really great
What I didn’t like about OG:
34. Groups have group types
• Like content types, but for groups
• Defines fields, permissions and available content
35. Groups have group types
• Like content types, but for groups
• Defines fields, permissions and available content
• Applies to all groups of that type, no per-group overrides
37. Group tells two stories
• Members
• Don’t really care about
the content, but more
about the relationship
• Example: gaming portal
Why or how?
38. Group tells two stories
• Members
• Don’t really care about
the content, but more
about the relationship
• Example: gaming portal
Why or how? What?
• Private nodes
• Don’t really care about
the relationship, but more
about the content
• Example: paid content