SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 42
Download to read offline
PROBLEMS ON PILES/DEEP FOOTING
Problem # 01
A cast in place concrete pile in
medium sand is 0.5 m in dia and 10 m long. The
water table is 2 m below the top of the pile. The
bulk density of sand above the water table is 1.8
t/m3 . and below the water table the density is
1.95 t/m3 . Angle of shearing resistance is 38o .
Assume Nqp = 60 and ks tan δ = 0.5, Dc /B = 8.
Determine the ultimate load and the safe load for
a pile with F.S = 3.
Solution
Qf = Qb + Qs
(1) Base resistence (Qb )
B = 0.5 m
Lp= 10 m
Nqp = 60 Dc = ? From table
for medium sand, Dc = 8 x B = 8 x 0.5 = 4 m
Lp > Dc .
fb = σo ′ Nqp Where σo ′ = Effective vertical pressure at
Dc .
σo ′= (1.8 x 9.8 x 2) + ( (1.95-1) x 9.8 x 2) = 53.9 kPa.
fb = 53.9 x 60 = 3234 kPa.
Qb = Ab x fb = π/4 B2 x fb . = π/4 x (0.5)2 x 3234 = 635 kN.
2 m
Dc = 4 m
• (ii) Frictional resistence, Qs
Qs = As x fs
fs =?
The frictional resistence is calculted by considering the pile in
three parts, 0-2m, 2 m - 4 m (Dc ) and 4 m –
10 m. The frictional resistence will increase upto Dc only = 4
m.
σ′ at 2 m = 2 x 1.8 x 9.8 = 35.28 kPa.
σ′ at 4 m = (35.28 + ( 1.95- 1) x 9.8 x 2) = 53.9 kPa.
Average vertical stress for 0-2 m = 17.64 kPa. ( 0+ 35.28/2)
∴ Av. fs1 =17.64 x ks tan δ = 17.64 x 0.5 = 8.82 kPa.
Av. Stress for 2 m to 4 m = 53.9 + 35.28/2 = 44.59 kPa.
∴ Av. fs2 = σ′s x ks tanδ = 44.59 x 0.5 = 22.3 kPa.
• Vertical stress below Dc is assumed constant and
equal to 53.9 kPa.
• ∴fs3 = 53.9 x 0.5 = 26.95 ( unit skin friction)
• ∴Qs = fs1 x πB x D1 + fs2 x πB (Dc – D1) + fs3 πB (Lp -
Dc )
• = 8.82 x π x 0.5 x 2 + 22.3 x π x 0.5 x 2
+26.95 x π 0.5 x 6 = 352 kN.
• Qf = Qb + Qs = 635 + 352 = 987 kN.
• Qa = Qf /3 = 987/3 = 329 kN.
Problem # 02
• A cased concrete pile, 0.42 m outside
diameter, is driven through 11 m of loose
sand and for a depth of 3 m into underlying
medium dense sand. The skin friction is
measured with a static cone fitted with a
friction sleeve; fs = fc(av) = 20 kPa in loose sand
and fs = fc(av) = 55 kPa in medium dense sand.
The cone resistence at base level is 12000 kPa.
Determine the safe load for a pile, using F.S =
2.5.
Solution
• Qf = Qb + Qs
• Qb = π/4 B2 x fb fb = qc = 12000 kPa but
limit is 11000 kPa
• ∴Qb = π/4 (0.42)2 x 11000 = 1524 kN.
• Qs = Qs1 + Qs2 ,Qs1 = through loose sand = 11m
• Qs2 = through medium dense sand =3 m.
• Qs = πB x 11 x 20 + πB x 3 x 55
• = π x 0.42 x 11 x 20 + π x 0.42 x 3 X 55 = 290.28 + 217.71
• Qf = Qb + Qs = 1524 + 290.28 + 217.71= 2032.0 kN.
• Qa = Qf /2.5 = 2032/2.5 = 812.8 kN.
Problem # 03
• Determine the penetration depth for a 40 cm dia.
Concrete pile which is required to carry load of
900 kN at a safety factor of 2.5. The soil consists
of silty sand upto a depth of 10 m in which the
average cone resistance (qc)av = 4000 kPa. Silty
sand is underlain by dense sand. The average
cone resistance increases to 13000 kPa within the
depth 10 m to 10.5 m and to 18000 kPa below
10.5 m. to reach full base resistance the pile must
be driven to at least 5B, i-e 2 m, in bearing
stratum of dense sand.
Solution
• Try the allowable load for a pile, embedded
length 12m. Min.
• Qf = Qb + Qs
• Qb = fb x Ab
• fb = qc = 18000 kPa But limit of fb =11000 kPa
• ∴Qb = fb x π/4 B2 = 11000 x (0.42)2 x π/4 =
1381.6 kN.
• Now Qs = Qs1 +Qs2 +Qs3.
0-10m 10-10.5m + > 10.5.
∴fs1 = 0-10m = qc av /200 = 4000/200 =20 kPa.
• fs2 = 10 – 10.5 = qc av /200 = 13000/200 =65 kPa.
• fs3 = 10.5 – 12 = qc av /200 = 18000/200 = 90 kPa. (< 100 kPa)
• Qs = π B [(10x20) + (0.5x65) + (1.5x90)]
D1 x fs1 D2 x fs2 D3 x fs3
= π x 0.4 ( 200 + 32.5 + 135) = 461.81 kN.
Qf = Qb + Qs = 1381.6 + 461.81 = 1 843.41
fs3 x π B x D = 407
D = 407/90 x πx 0.4 = 3.6m.
12 + 3.6 = 15.6 m
Qa = Qf /F.S. 1843.41/2.5 =737.36
Qf = Qa x F.S = 900 x 2.5 = 2250.
Receiving Load = 2250 – 1843 = 407 kN
Problem # 04
• A bored concrete pile 30 cm in dia. And 6.5m
long, passes through stiff fissured clay,
subjected to seasonal shrinkage and swelling
upto a depth of 1.5m. The average undrained
strength of clay varies linearly from 50 kPa at
1.5m to 186 kPa at 10m. Find the ultimate
load capacity. Assume α = 0.3.
Solution
• 1.5m top is ignored as the shrinkage may cause
all adhesion to be lost.
• Cu at 1.5m depth = 50 kPa.
• Now cu at base = 50 + 186- 50/8.5 x 5 = 130 kPa
• ∴ Average cu = 50 + 130 /2 = 90 kPa.
• Qf = fb x Ab + fs As
• 1170 x π/4 (0.3)2 + 27 x π x 0.3 x 5
• =82.7 + 127.27 = 210 kN.
Problem # 05
(uplift Resistance)
• Find the uplift resistance and the safe uplift
resistance (F.S = 2.5) of the under reamed pile
installed in clay with the following data. (if the
top 2m clay is active and subjected to swelling)
• Dia of shaft = 40 cm, dia. of bulb at base = 100cm.
• Length of shaft above bulb = 5m cu av along shaft
= 115 kPa. Cu at base = 150 kPa and adhesion
factor α = 0.4
Solution
• Projected area of bulb = π/4 (Bb – B2)= 0.659
m2 .
• Neglecting top 2m of activeness
• As = π B x 3 = 3.77 m2
• Qup = 0.659 fb + 3.77 fs [ fb =Nc x cu =9x150=135
fs = α cu = 0.4x 115 = 46]
= 0.659x 1350 + 3.77 x 46 = 1063 kN
Safe uplift resistance = 1063/2.5 = 425 kN
Problem # 06
• Find the penetration depth for a 35cm square R.C
pile driven through sea bed for a jetty structure
to carry a maximum compressive load of 500 kN
and a net uplift load of 300 kN. The soil below sea
bed consists of a 10m thick layer of saturated
medium dense sand overlying dense sand and
gravel. The average corrected SPT blows in the
top 10m sand are 12 and on bottom sand gravel
layer 40. No erosion is expected. The minimum
safety factor should be 2.5 on the uplift load and
4 on the compressive load.
Solution
• Nav for top10m = 12 (sandy layer)
• N in sand –gravel = 40
• Total ultimate uplift resistance required = 2.5x 300 = 750 kN
• Now fs (medium dense sand)= 2 Nav = 2x12=24 kPa.
• Qs (uplift ) in top 10m = (4x0.35x10)24 = fs x As =336 kN.
• Remaiing uplift resistance = 750 – 336 = 44 kN.
• Friction resistance per meter length in sand gravel = fs xAs (one meter)
• fs (dense gravel) = 2 Nav = 2x 40 = 80 kPa.
Friction resistance /meter length = 80 x 4 x 0.35x1 =112 kN/m.
Further penetration required in dense gravel to resist the uplift of 414 kN.
= 414/112 = 3.7m
∴Total Penetration = 10 + 3.7 = 13.7m for uplift.
Check for compressive load.
Qf =Qb + Qs.
Qb = fb x Ab.
fb (dense gravel) = 40 N Lp /B ≤ 400 N. ≤400x40 ≤ 16000 kPa.
=40x4x 3.7/0.35= 16914.3 ≤ 16000 kPa.
But maximum value of fb which could be adopted = 11000 kPa.
∴ fb = 11000.
Now Qb = 11000 x (0.35)2 = 1347.5 kN.
Qs is same for compression as for uplift.
∴ Qf = 1347 + 750 = 2097 kN.
∴ F = Qf /Qa = 2097/500 = 4.2 > 4 safe.
this indicates that the required penetration is governed by uplift
resistance.
∴ Penetration depth = 13.7 m below sea bed level
Problem # 07
(Pile load test)
• The following data refers to a cyclic pile load
test carried out on a 300mm dia. pile 10m
long.
• Plot the load settlement curves (total and net)
and estimate the allowable load by different
methods/criterians.
Load on pile top (kN) 150 200 250 300 400 500 600
Total settlement on pile
top (mm)
1.45 2.25 2.75 3.6 5.75 10.75 30.00
Net settlement on pile
top (mm)
0.40 0.65 0.80 1.0 1.70 5.25 22.80
Solution
• Plot the load vs settlement ( Arithmatic graph)
• Plot the load vs Net settlement(Arth. graph)
• (a) Two third of the load causing 12 mm settlement, that is
• Qa = 2/3 x 500 = 333.33 kN
• (b) 50% of the load causing
• Total settlement equal to 10%
• Of the pile dia. i.e settlement of
• 30mm (i.e 600 kN)
• Qa = 1/2 x 600 = 300 kN.
• (c) Net settlement 6mm 2/3 rd of that
• 2/3 x 550 = 1100/3 = 366.66 kN
• (d) Falling to striaght line Qu 600 kN, use F.S =2.
• 600/2 = 300
• Least of the above is 300 kN
Load
Settlement
Problem # 08
• Two independent loading tests on 300mm dia.
Short bored piles in clay for which φ = 0, yielded
the following results.
• Embedded length of pile Added load at failure (kN)
• 2.15 100
• 2.75 110
• Assuming the adhesion is effective over the whole of the
embedded length, estimate the mean cohesion of the
soil and the shaft adhesion factor to be used in
extrapolating the test results to larger piles. The
densities of the soil and concrete are 1.92 Mg/m3 and
2.40 Mg/m3 respectively.
Solution:
• At point of failure ∑ v =0
• γs = 1.92 Mg/m3
• γc = 2.4 Mg/m3. Qb + Qs = P +
• (wt. of pile – wt. of excavated material)
• Now P = 100 kN Lp = 2.15m.
• Qb + Qs = c Ncp x Ab + α c As = c Ncp x π/4xd2 + α c xπ x d x Lp.
• = c x 9x π/4 x 0.32 + α c x π x 0.3 x 2.15 = 0.636 c + 2.027 α c
• Ncp = 9 (Lp /d > 4)
• P = 100 + wt. of pile – wt. of excavated material
• = 100 + (2.4- 1.92) x 9.81 (π/4 x 0.32 x 2.15)
• = 100 + 0.715
Wt.
P
Qs
Qb
• ∑ v = 0
• ∴ 100.715 = 0.636 c + 2.027 α c -----------(i)
• Similarly for 2nd test results ∑ v = 0
• Qb + Qs =9x c x π/4 (0.3)2 + α c xπ x 0.3 x2.75
• = 0.636 c + 2.592 α c
• Load = 110 + (2.4 – 1.92) x 9.81 (π/4 x 0.32 x 2.75)
• = 110 + 0.915 = 110.915
• 110.915 = 0.636 c + 2.592 α c ---------------------(ii)
• Solve equation simultaneously
• ∴ α c = 18.06 , c = 100 and αααα = 0.18
Problem # 09
• A free standing, square group of 16 piles extends
to a depth of 12 m in stiff clay which is underlain
by rock at 24 m depth. The piles are 0.5 m in
diameter and are spaced at 1.5 m centre's. cT at
base = 140 kPa, average (cT)av along shaft = 90
kPa, adhesion α = 0.45, coefficient of volume
decrease mv below base = 0.08 m2/MN,
remolded cT along shaft = 50 kPa. Assume group
efficiency Eg = 0.65. Find the allowable load for
the group with F = 2.5. Also estimate the
settlement under the allowable load.
Solution:
• (a) Considering individual piles.
fb = cT Ncp = 140 x 9 = 1260 kPa
fs = α cT = 0.45 x 90 = 40.5 kPa
Qf = π/4 B2 fb + B Lp fs
= π/4 0.52 x 1260 + π x 0.5 x 12 x 40.5 = 247.4 + 763.4 =
1010.8 kN
Qg = Eg .n Qf = 0.65 x 16 x 1010.8 = 10512 kN
(b)Considering block failure.
QB = Bo Lo fb + 2 Lp ( Bo +Lo) fB ; Bo = Lo = 5 m, Lp = 12 m
fb = cT Ncp = 140 x 9 =1260 kPa
fs = cT ( remolded) = 50 kPa
QB = 43500 kN > Qg (31500 + 12000)
Qa = 1/2.5 Qg = 10512/2.5 = 4205 kN
• For a settlement the load is assumed to act at
an equivalent raft (5 m x 5 m) located at 12/3
= 4 m above the base. The compressible zone
of 16 m thickness is divided into 4 layers, each
4 m thick. Pressure increase at the middle of
each layer is calculated by assuming 2:1
spread of load Qs. The calculations are given in
table. The total settlement is 48 mm.
Layer Mid-depth
(m)
Area
(m2 )
∆σ∆σ∆σ∆σ
(kPa)
mv ∆σ∆σ∆σ∆σ H (mm)
1 2 49 85.80 27.45
2 6 121 34.75 11.12
3 10 225 18.68 5.97
4 14 361 11.65 3.73
48.28
Problem # 10
• A 40-ft-long precast pile is fully embedded in
sand. The cross section of pile measures 12 in
x 12 in. The allowable working load for the
pile is 80 kip and 54 kip is contributed by skin
friction. Determine the elastic settlement of
the pile. Ep = 3 x 106 lb/in2 , Es = 4500 lb/in2 ,
and µs = 0.3.
Solution:
( )
[ ]
2
2
2
31
2
2326
p
1
/18.0
144
26
,.82.0,27.3
)1(
.065.0
)103)(144(
)1240()54)(6.0(26
.1441212
26,54,/103/103E0.6,Let
inkip
A
Q
q
AlsoIFigureFrom
I
E
Dq
s
ins
TheninxA
kipQkipQinkipxinlbx
EA
LQQ
s
p
wp
wp
wp
wps
s
wp
p
wpws
pp
wswp
===
=
−=
=
×
×+
=
==
=====
+
=
µ
ξ
ξ
( )( )
( )( )
( )
.71.0287.0358.0065.0
.287.021.4)3.01(
1000
4500
12
40124
54
21.4
0.1
40
35.0235.02
)1(
.38.082.03.01
1000
4500
1218.0
2
3
2
3
2
2
ins
issettlementtotaltheHence
ins
So
D
L
I
I
E
D
pL
Q
s
ins
So
ws
wss
s
ws
=++=
=−





×
=
=+=+=
−





=
=−






×
=
µ
Problem # 11
Refer to Figure 8.47 which shows the plan of a
pile group. Each pile has a square cross
section measuring 12 in x 12 in. the center-to-
center spacing of the piles is 30 in.
Determine the group efficiency of the piles by
using:
a. Eq. (8.112)
b. Eq. (8.114)
30 in.
12in
Fig. 8.47
Solution:
• Part a: Using Eq. (8.112)
•
( )
( )( )
( )( )( )
%4.60604.0
3418
48302342
.,484,12,3,4
422
21
21
21
==
+−+
=
=====
+−+
=
η
η
inDpandinDnnFor
npn
Ddnn
• Part b: Using Eq. (8.114)
( ) ( )
( )( ) ( )( )
( )( )( )
( ) %.7.65657.08.21
4390
4233
1
8.21
30
12
tantan
tan
90
11
1
11
1
21
1221
==




 +
−=
=





=
















 −+−
−=
−−
−
o
o
So
d
D
d
D
nn
nnnn
η
η
Pr. 13
Solution:
• From Eq. (8.116),
[ ]
( )( )
( )( )
( )( )( )( )( ) ( )( )( )( )[ ]
( ) kN
Q
So
mkNcforFigureFrom
mp
mA
LpccAnnQ
u
u
p
upupu
1038703.80759.5812
157022.163.070093.0934
.63.0,/7019.8
22.1305.04
093.0305.0305.0
9
2
2
2
)(21
≈+=
+=Σ
==
==
==
∆Σ+=Σ
α
α
• Again from Eq. (8.117), the ultimate block capacity is Lg
Bg cu(p) Nc*+∑2(Lg +Bg) cu ∆L, So
• Lg = (n1 – 1)d +2(D/2) = (4-1)(1.22)+ 0.305=3.965 m
• Bg = (n2-1)d + 2(D/2) = (3-1)(1.22)+ 0.305= 2.745 m
• L/Bg = 15/2.745= 5.46
• Lg /Bg = 3.965/2.745 = 1.44
• From Figure 7.16, Nc*≈ 8.6. Thus
• Block capacity = (3.965)(2.745)(70)(8.6) + 2(3.965 +
2.745)(70)(15) = 6552 + 14091 = 20643 kN
• So
• Qg(u) 10,387 kN < 20,643 kN
• Qg(all) = Qg(u) /FS = 10,387/4 ≈ 2597 kN.
Problem # 14
• A group pile in clay is shown in Fig. Determine
the consolidation settlement of the pile
groups. All clays are normally consolidated.
6 ft
48 ft
3 ft
27 ft
21 ft
12 ft
6 ft
2v:1H2v:1H
z
45 ft
30 ft
Water table
Qg = 500 kip
Clay
γsat = 115 lb/ft3
eo = 0.82
Cc = 0.3
γsat = 120lb/ft3
eo = 0.7
Cc = 0.2
γsat = 122 lb/ft3
eo = 0.75
Cc = 0.25
Clay
Clay
sand
γ = 105 lb/ft3
Rock
Po(1),
∆p(1)
Po(2),
∆p(2)
Po(3),
∆p(3)
Pile group: Lg = 9ft; Bg = 6ft
Solution:
• The stress distribution pattern is shown in
Figure 8.49. Hence
• ( )( )
( )( )
( )( )
( )( )
( )( )
( )( )
( )( ) ( )
( )( ) .45.87.0
2603
15542603
log
82.01
213.0
/26034.62115
2
21
271056
log
1
/265
366369
1000500
/421
276279
1000500
/1554
2
21
6
2
21
9
1000500
1
2
)1(
)1(
)1()1(
)1(
1)1(
1
2
)3(
2
)2(
2
11
)1(
infts
ftlbp
p
pp
e
HC
s
ftlbp
ftlbp
ftlb
zBzL
Q
p
o
o
o
o
c
gg
g
==




 +
+
=∆
=−





++=







 ∆+
+
=∆
=
++
=∆
=
++
=∆
=






+





+
=
++
=∆
( )( ) ( )( ) ( )( )
( )( )
( )( ) ( )( ) ( )( )
( )( )
( )( )
.58.929.084.045.8,
29.0024.0
4025
2654025
log
75.01
625.0
/40254.621223
4.62120124.62115481056
84.0
3500
4213500
log
7.01
122.0
/35004.6212064.6211521271056
log
1
3
2
)3(
2
2
)2(
)2(
)2()2(
)2(
2)2(
2
inssettlementTotal
infts
ftlb
p
ins
ftlbp
p
pp
e
HC
s
g
o
o
o
o
o
c
=++=∆
≈=


 +
+
=∆
=−
+−+−+=
=




 +
+
=∆
=−+−++=







 ∆+
+
=∆
Problem # 15
• It is proposed to carry the load from a column on 350
mm diameter bored piles. The total load to be carried
is 2000 kN and the soil consists of a deep deposit of
clay having the following properties:
• If the piles are
• about 9 m long,
• Estimate the
• Number reqired
• And suggest how
• they should be
• arranged
Depth
(m)
Undrained shear strength (kN/m2)
0 100
3 110
6 125
9 125
12 135
Solution:
• Consider the ultimate load carried on pile:
• Qf = Qb + Qs
• Taking average cu on shaft of pile as = 115 kN/m2 and
an adhesion factor of 0.45 for a bored pile:
• Qf = 125 x 9 x (π/4 x 0.352) + 115 x 0.45 x (π x0.35 x
9)
• = 108 + 512 = 620 kN
• Using a factor of safety of 3: Qa = 620/3 = 207 kN
• ∴ No of piles required to carry 2000 kN = 2000/207 =
9.6
• Say 9 piles which reduces the factor of safety slightly.
•
• Bored piles should be spaced at about 3 times
their diameter and a suggested arrangement is
shown on Fig.
• The action of the group
• Must be checked for
stability.
Consider a pier 2.35 m square:
Qfg = 125 x 9 x 2.352 +115 x 0.45 x (4 x 2.35 x 9)
= 6212 + 4378 = 10590 kN
1 m
2.35 m
1 m

More Related Content

What's hot

Bearing capacity theory is code ,vesic ,hansen, meyerhof, skemptons( usefulse...
Bearing capacity theory is code ,vesic ,hansen, meyerhof, skemptons( usefulse...Bearing capacity theory is code ,vesic ,hansen, meyerhof, skemptons( usefulse...
Bearing capacity theory is code ,vesic ,hansen, meyerhof, skemptons( usefulse...Make Mannan
 
Geotechnical Engineering-I [Lec #21: Consolidation Problems]
Geotechnical Engineering-I [Lec #21: Consolidation Problems]Geotechnical Engineering-I [Lec #21: Consolidation Problems]
Geotechnical Engineering-I [Lec #21: Consolidation Problems]Muhammad Irfan
 
Numerical problem on bearing capacity is code terzaghi water table (usefulsea...
Numerical problem on bearing capacity is code terzaghi water table (usefulsea...Numerical problem on bearing capacity is code terzaghi water table (usefulsea...
Numerical problem on bearing capacity is code terzaghi water table (usefulsea...Make Mannan
 
_lateral_earth_pressure_(foundation engineering)
_lateral_earth_pressure_(foundation engineering)_lateral_earth_pressure_(foundation engineering)
_lateral_earth_pressure_(foundation engineering)sharda university
 
Settlement of shallow foundation
Settlement of shallow foundationSettlement of shallow foundation
Settlement of shallow foundationLatif Hyder Wadho
 
Load carrying capacity of piles
Load carrying capacity of pilesLoad carrying capacity of piles
Load carrying capacity of pilesLatif Hyder Wadho
 
Geotechnical Engineering-II [Lec #7A: Boussinesq Method]
Geotechnical Engineering-II [Lec #7A: Boussinesq Method]Geotechnical Engineering-II [Lec #7A: Boussinesq Method]
Geotechnical Engineering-II [Lec #7A: Boussinesq Method]Muhammad Irfan
 
Numerical Question on Terzaghi Bearing Capacity Theory, Meyerhof Bearing Capa...
Numerical Question on Terzaghi Bearing Capacity Theory, Meyerhof Bearing Capa...Numerical Question on Terzaghi Bearing Capacity Theory, Meyerhof Bearing Capa...
Numerical Question on Terzaghi Bearing Capacity Theory, Meyerhof Bearing Capa...Make Mannan
 
Bearing capacity of shallow foundations by abhishek sharma
Bearing capacity of shallow foundations by abhishek sharma Bearing capacity of shallow foundations by abhishek sharma
Bearing capacity of shallow foundations by abhishek sharma ABHISHEK SHARMA
 
Geotechnical Engineering-II [Lec #19: General Bearing Capacity Equation]
Geotechnical Engineering-II [Lec #19: General Bearing Capacity Equation]Geotechnical Engineering-II [Lec #19: General Bearing Capacity Equation]
Geotechnical Engineering-II [Lec #19: General Bearing Capacity Equation]Muhammad Irfan
 
Geotechnical Engineering-II [Lec #23: Rankine Earth Pressure Theory]
Geotechnical Engineering-II [Lec #23: Rankine Earth Pressure Theory]Geotechnical Engineering-II [Lec #23: Rankine Earth Pressure Theory]
Geotechnical Engineering-II [Lec #23: Rankine Earth Pressure Theory]Muhammad Irfan
 
LECTURE 5 safety and stability analysis- modified-2
LECTURE 5 safety and stability analysis- modified-2LECTURE 5 safety and stability analysis- modified-2
LECTURE 5 safety and stability analysis- modified-2Bakenaz A. Zeidan
 
Numerical problem bearing capacity terzaghi , group pile capacity (usefulsear...
Numerical problem bearing capacity terzaghi , group pile capacity (usefulsear...Numerical problem bearing capacity terzaghi , group pile capacity (usefulsear...
Numerical problem bearing capacity terzaghi , group pile capacity (usefulsear...Make Mannan
 
Lecture 7 stress distribution in soil
Lecture 7 stress distribution in soilLecture 7 stress distribution in soil
Lecture 7 stress distribution in soilDr.Abdulmannan Orabi
 
Examples on soil classification
Examples on soil classification Examples on soil classification
Examples on soil classification Malika khalil
 

What's hot (20)

Bearing capacity theory is code ,vesic ,hansen, meyerhof, skemptons( usefulse...
Bearing capacity theory is code ,vesic ,hansen, meyerhof, skemptons( usefulse...Bearing capacity theory is code ,vesic ,hansen, meyerhof, skemptons( usefulse...
Bearing capacity theory is code ,vesic ,hansen, meyerhof, skemptons( usefulse...
 
Geotechnical Engineering-I [Lec #21: Consolidation Problems]
Geotechnical Engineering-I [Lec #21: Consolidation Problems]Geotechnical Engineering-I [Lec #21: Consolidation Problems]
Geotechnical Engineering-I [Lec #21: Consolidation Problems]
 
Numerical problem on bearing capacity is code terzaghi water table (usefulsea...
Numerical problem on bearing capacity is code terzaghi water table (usefulsea...Numerical problem on bearing capacity is code terzaghi water table (usefulsea...
Numerical problem on bearing capacity is code terzaghi water table (usefulsea...
 
_lateral_earth_pressure_(foundation engineering)
_lateral_earth_pressure_(foundation engineering)_lateral_earth_pressure_(foundation engineering)
_lateral_earth_pressure_(foundation engineering)
 
Settlement of shallow foundation
Settlement of shallow foundationSettlement of shallow foundation
Settlement of shallow foundation
 
CBR Test
CBR TestCBR Test
CBR Test
 
Load carrying capacity of piles
Load carrying capacity of pilesLoad carrying capacity of piles
Load carrying capacity of piles
 
Geotechnical Engineering-II [Lec #7A: Boussinesq Method]
Geotechnical Engineering-II [Lec #7A: Boussinesq Method]Geotechnical Engineering-II [Lec #7A: Boussinesq Method]
Geotechnical Engineering-II [Lec #7A: Boussinesq Method]
 
Examples on seepage
Examples on seepageExamples on seepage
Examples on seepage
 
Numerical Question on Terzaghi Bearing Capacity Theory, Meyerhof Bearing Capa...
Numerical Question on Terzaghi Bearing Capacity Theory, Meyerhof Bearing Capa...Numerical Question on Terzaghi Bearing Capacity Theory, Meyerhof Bearing Capa...
Numerical Question on Terzaghi Bearing Capacity Theory, Meyerhof Bearing Capa...
 
Bearing capacity of shallow foundations by abhishek sharma
Bearing capacity of shallow foundations by abhishek sharma Bearing capacity of shallow foundations by abhishek sharma
Bearing capacity of shallow foundations by abhishek sharma
 
Geotechnical Engineering-II [Lec #19: General Bearing Capacity Equation]
Geotechnical Engineering-II [Lec #19: General Bearing Capacity Equation]Geotechnical Engineering-II [Lec #19: General Bearing Capacity Equation]
Geotechnical Engineering-II [Lec #19: General Bearing Capacity Equation]
 
Geotechnical Engineering-II [Lec #23: Rankine Earth Pressure Theory]
Geotechnical Engineering-II [Lec #23: Rankine Earth Pressure Theory]Geotechnical Engineering-II [Lec #23: Rankine Earth Pressure Theory]
Geotechnical Engineering-II [Lec #23: Rankine Earth Pressure Theory]
 
LECTURE 5 safety and stability analysis- modified-2
LECTURE 5 safety and stability analysis- modified-2LECTURE 5 safety and stability analysis- modified-2
LECTURE 5 safety and stability analysis- modified-2
 
Lecture 3 foundation settlement
Lecture 3 foundation settlementLecture 3 foundation settlement
Lecture 3 foundation settlement
 
Numerical problem bearing capacity terzaghi , group pile capacity (usefulsear...
Numerical problem bearing capacity terzaghi , group pile capacity (usefulsear...Numerical problem bearing capacity terzaghi , group pile capacity (usefulsear...
Numerical problem bearing capacity terzaghi , group pile capacity (usefulsear...
 
Lecture 7 stress distribution in soil
Lecture 7 stress distribution in soilLecture 7 stress distribution in soil
Lecture 7 stress distribution in soil
 
Examples on soil classification
Examples on soil classification Examples on soil classification
Examples on soil classification
 
Pile foundation
Pile  foundation Pile  foundation
Pile foundation
 
Hydraulic jump
Hydraulic jumpHydraulic jump
Hydraulic jump
 

Similar to Problems on piles and deep footing

Sums on Rigid Pavement Design
Sums on Rigid Pavement DesignSums on Rigid Pavement Design
Sums on Rigid Pavement DesignArnabKarmakar18
 
Foundationeng deep-foundations_ps
Foundationeng deep-foundations_psFoundationeng deep-foundations_ps
Foundationeng deep-foundations_psİsimsiz Kahraman
 
Question on pile capacity (usefulsearch.org) (useful search)
Question on pile capacity (usefulsearch.org) (useful search)Question on pile capacity (usefulsearch.org) (useful search)
Question on pile capacity (usefulsearch.org) (useful search)Make Mannan
 
Problemas resueltos-cap-14-fisica-sears-zemansky
Problemas resueltos-cap-14-fisica-sears-zemanskyProblemas resueltos-cap-14-fisica-sears-zemansky
Problemas resueltos-cap-14-fisica-sears-zemanskywilmersm
 
Shallow and Deep Founation Design Calucations
Shallow and Deep Founation Design CalucationsShallow and Deep Founation Design Calucations
Shallow and Deep Founation Design CalucationsTyler Edgington
 
Mecánica de Fluidos_Merle C. Potter, David C. Wiggert_3ed Solucionario
Mecánica de Fluidos_Merle C. Potter, David C. Wiggert_3ed SolucionarioMecánica de Fluidos_Merle C. Potter, David C. Wiggert_3ed Solucionario
Mecánica de Fluidos_Merle C. Potter, David C. Wiggert_3ed SolucionarioEdgar Ortiz Sánchez
 
Solution Manul for Structural Analysis in SI Units 10th Edition by Russell Hi...
Solution Manul for Structural Analysis in SI Units 10th Edition by Russell Hi...Solution Manul for Structural Analysis in SI Units 10th Edition by Russell Hi...
Solution Manul for Structural Analysis in SI Units 10th Edition by Russell Hi...physicsbook
 
WavesNotesAnswers.pdf
WavesNotesAnswers.pdfWavesNotesAnswers.pdf
WavesNotesAnswers.pdfcfisicaster
 
Sachpazis_ANCHORED PILED RETAINING WALL to EC2
Sachpazis_ANCHORED PILED RETAINING WALL to EC2Sachpazis_ANCHORED PILED RETAINING WALL to EC2
Sachpazis_ANCHORED PILED RETAINING WALL to EC2Dr.Costas Sachpazis
 
Shallow Foundations ( Combined, Strap, Raft foundation)
Shallow Foundations ( Combined, Strap, Raft foundation)Shallow Foundations ( Combined, Strap, Raft foundation)
Shallow Foundations ( Combined, Strap, Raft foundation)Mohammed Zakaria
 
Muro de contencion en voladizo
Muro de contencion en voladizoMuro de contencion en voladizo
Muro de contencion en voladizoRobertVasquez46
 
DESIGN OF CIRCULAR OVERHEAD WATER TANK.pptx
DESIGN OF CIRCULAR OVERHEAD WATER TANK.pptxDESIGN OF CIRCULAR OVERHEAD WATER TANK.pptx
DESIGN OF CIRCULAR OVERHEAD WATER TANK.pptxsubhashini214160
 

Similar to Problems on piles and deep footing (20)

Sums on Rigid Pavement Design
Sums on Rigid Pavement DesignSums on Rigid Pavement Design
Sums on Rigid Pavement Design
 
Foundationeng deep-foundations_ps
Foundationeng deep-foundations_psFoundationeng deep-foundations_ps
Foundationeng deep-foundations_ps
 
Question on pile capacity (usefulsearch.org) (useful search)
Question on pile capacity (usefulsearch.org) (useful search)Question on pile capacity (usefulsearch.org) (useful search)
Question on pile capacity (usefulsearch.org) (useful search)
 
design-of-mat-sd.pdf
design-of-mat-sd.pdfdesign-of-mat-sd.pdf
design-of-mat-sd.pdf
 
Ch.4-Examples 2.pdf
Ch.4-Examples 2.pdfCh.4-Examples 2.pdf
Ch.4-Examples 2.pdf
 
Problemas resueltos-cap-14-fisica-sears-zemansky
Problemas resueltos-cap-14-fisica-sears-zemanskyProblemas resueltos-cap-14-fisica-sears-zemansky
Problemas resueltos-cap-14-fisica-sears-zemansky
 
Precast driven pile 450 x450
Precast driven pile 450 x450Precast driven pile 450 x450
Precast driven pile 450 x450
 
problemas resueltos
problemas resueltosproblemas resueltos
problemas resueltos
 
Shallow and Deep Founation Design Calucations
Shallow and Deep Founation Design CalucationsShallow and Deep Founation Design Calucations
Shallow and Deep Founation Design Calucations
 
Mecánica de Fluidos_Merle C. Potter, David C. Wiggert_3ed Solucionario
Mecánica de Fluidos_Merle C. Potter, David C. Wiggert_3ed SolucionarioMecánica de Fluidos_Merle C. Potter, David C. Wiggert_3ed Solucionario
Mecánica de Fluidos_Merle C. Potter, David C. Wiggert_3ed Solucionario
 
RCC BMD
RCC BMDRCC BMD
RCC BMD
 
Solution Manul for Structural Analysis in SI Units 10th Edition by Russell Hi...
Solution Manul for Structural Analysis in SI Units 10th Edition by Russell Hi...Solution Manul for Structural Analysis in SI Units 10th Edition by Russell Hi...
Solution Manul for Structural Analysis in SI Units 10th Edition by Russell Hi...
 
WavesNotesAnswers.pdf
WavesNotesAnswers.pdfWavesNotesAnswers.pdf
WavesNotesAnswers.pdf
 
Puentes
PuentesPuentes
Puentes
 
Sachpazis_ANCHORED PILED RETAINING WALL to EC2
Sachpazis_ANCHORED PILED RETAINING WALL to EC2Sachpazis_ANCHORED PILED RETAINING WALL to EC2
Sachpazis_ANCHORED PILED RETAINING WALL to EC2
 
Shallow Foundations ( Combined, Strap, Raft foundation)
Shallow Foundations ( Combined, Strap, Raft foundation)Shallow Foundations ( Combined, Strap, Raft foundation)
Shallow Foundations ( Combined, Strap, Raft foundation)
 
Muro contension raul1
Muro contension raul1Muro contension raul1
Muro contension raul1
 
Muro de contencion en voladizo
Muro de contencion en voladizoMuro de contencion en voladizo
Muro de contencion en voladizo
 
DESIGN OF CIRCULAR OVERHEAD WATER TANK.pptx
DESIGN OF CIRCULAR OVERHEAD WATER TANK.pptxDESIGN OF CIRCULAR OVERHEAD WATER TANK.pptx
DESIGN OF CIRCULAR OVERHEAD WATER TANK.pptx
 
Bef 2
Bef 2Bef 2
Bef 2
 

More from Latif Hyder Wadho

Internal Control Internal Checking Internal Auditing - Auditing By LATiFHRW
Internal Control  Internal Checking Internal Auditing - Auditing By LATiFHRWInternal Control  Internal Checking Internal Auditing - Auditing By LATiFHRW
Internal Control Internal Checking Internal Auditing - Auditing By LATiFHRWLatif Hyder Wadho
 
Supply and Demand - Modern Economics LATiFHRW
Supply and Demand - Modern Economics LATiFHRWSupply and Demand - Modern Economics LATiFHRW
Supply and Demand - Modern Economics LATiFHRWLatif Hyder Wadho
 
SPSC CCE 2013 Pcs past papers
SPSC  CCE 2013 Pcs past papersSPSC  CCE 2013 Pcs past papers
SPSC CCE 2013 Pcs past papersLatif Hyder Wadho
 
SPSC CCE 2013 Pcs screening test
SPSC CCE 2013 Pcs screening testSPSC CCE 2013 Pcs screening test
SPSC CCE 2013 Pcs screening testLatif Hyder Wadho
 
Why is english as a global language
Why is english as a global languageWhy is english as a global language
Why is english as a global languageLatif Hyder Wadho
 
Introduction to Geo technical Engineering 2
 Introduction to Geo technical Engineering 2 Introduction to Geo technical Engineering 2
Introduction to Geo technical Engineering 2Latif Hyder Wadho
 
Introdction to Geo technical Engineering
Introdction to Geo technical EngineeringIntrodction to Geo technical Engineering
Introdction to Geo technical EngineeringLatif Hyder Wadho
 
Sub surface exploration part 2
Sub surface exploration part 2Sub surface exploration part 2
Sub surface exploration part 2Latif Hyder Wadho
 
Subsurface exploration (part-3)
Subsurface exploration (part-3)Subsurface exploration (part-3)
Subsurface exploration (part-3)Latif Hyder Wadho
 
Sub surface exploration (part-1)
Sub surface exploration (part-1)Sub surface exploration (part-1)
Sub surface exploration (part-1)Latif Hyder Wadho
 
Introduction to Foundation Engineering
Introduction to Foundation EngineeringIntroduction to Foundation Engineering
Introduction to Foundation EngineeringLatif Hyder Wadho
 
Subsurface exploration of soil
Subsurface exploration of soilSubsurface exploration of soil
Subsurface exploration of soilLatif Hyder Wadho
 

More from Latif Hyder Wadho (20)

Internal Control Internal Checking Internal Auditing - Auditing By LATiFHRW
Internal Control  Internal Checking Internal Auditing - Auditing By LATiFHRWInternal Control  Internal Checking Internal Auditing - Auditing By LATiFHRW
Internal Control Internal Checking Internal Auditing - Auditing By LATiFHRW
 
Supply and Demand - Modern Economics LATiFHRW
Supply and Demand - Modern Economics LATiFHRWSupply and Demand - Modern Economics LATiFHRW
Supply and Demand - Modern Economics LATiFHRW
 
Surveying and Leveling
Surveying and LevelingSurveying and Leveling
Surveying and Leveling
 
Energy crisis in Pakistan
Energy crisis in PakistanEnergy crisis in Pakistan
Energy crisis in Pakistan
 
SPSC PCS Syllabus cce 2018
SPSC PCS Syllabus cce 2018SPSC PCS Syllabus cce 2018
SPSC PCS Syllabus cce 2018
 
SPSC CCE 2013 Pcs past papers
SPSC  CCE 2013 Pcs past papersSPSC  CCE 2013 Pcs past papers
SPSC CCE 2013 Pcs past papers
 
SPSC CCE 2013 Pcs screening test
SPSC CCE 2013 Pcs screening testSPSC CCE 2013 Pcs screening test
SPSC CCE 2013 Pcs screening test
 
Engineering drawing
Engineering drawingEngineering drawing
Engineering drawing
 
Why is english as a global language
Why is english as a global languageWhy is english as a global language
Why is english as a global language
 
Bricks
BricksBricks
Bricks
 
Introduction to Geo technical Engineering 2
 Introduction to Geo technical Engineering 2 Introduction to Geo technical Engineering 2
Introduction to Geo technical Engineering 2
 
Introdction to Geo technical Engineering
Introdction to Geo technical EngineeringIntrodction to Geo technical Engineering
Introdction to Geo technical Engineering
 
Sub surface exploration part 2
Sub surface exploration part 2Sub surface exploration part 2
Sub surface exploration part 2
 
Settlement of piles
Settlement of pilesSettlement of piles
Settlement of piles
 
Plate load test
Plate load testPlate load test
Plate load test
 
Subsurface exploration (part-3)
Subsurface exploration (part-3)Subsurface exploration (part-3)
Subsurface exploration (part-3)
 
Sub surface exploration (part-1)
Sub surface exploration (part-1)Sub surface exploration (part-1)
Sub surface exploration (part-1)
 
Introduction to Foundation Engineering
Introduction to Foundation EngineeringIntroduction to Foundation Engineering
Introduction to Foundation Engineering
 
Review of soil mechanics
Review of soil mechanicsReview of soil mechanics
Review of soil mechanics
 
Subsurface exploration of soil
Subsurface exploration of soilSubsurface exploration of soil
Subsurface exploration of soil
 

Recently uploaded

Introduction to Machine Learning Unit-3 for II MECH
Introduction to Machine Learning Unit-3 for II MECHIntroduction to Machine Learning Unit-3 for II MECH
Introduction to Machine Learning Unit-3 for II MECHC Sai Kiran
 
Correctly Loading Incremental Data at Scale
Correctly Loading Incremental Data at ScaleCorrectly Loading Incremental Data at Scale
Correctly Loading Incremental Data at ScaleAlluxio, Inc.
 
TechTAC® CFD Report Summary: A Comparison of Two Types of Tubing Anchor Catchers
TechTAC® CFD Report Summary: A Comparison of Two Types of Tubing Anchor CatchersTechTAC® CFD Report Summary: A Comparison of Two Types of Tubing Anchor Catchers
TechTAC® CFD Report Summary: A Comparison of Two Types of Tubing Anchor Catcherssdickerson1
 
Electronically Controlled suspensions system .pdf
Electronically Controlled suspensions system .pdfElectronically Controlled suspensions system .pdf
Electronically Controlled suspensions system .pdfme23b1001
 
Risk Assessment For Installation of Drainage Pipes.pdf
Risk Assessment For Installation of Drainage Pipes.pdfRisk Assessment For Installation of Drainage Pipes.pdf
Risk Assessment For Installation of Drainage Pipes.pdfROCENODodongVILLACER
 
Indian Dairy Industry Present Status and.ppt
Indian Dairy Industry Present Status and.pptIndian Dairy Industry Present Status and.ppt
Indian Dairy Industry Present Status and.pptMadan Karki
 
Software and Systems Engineering Standards: Verification and Validation of Sy...
Software and Systems Engineering Standards: Verification and Validation of Sy...Software and Systems Engineering Standards: Verification and Validation of Sy...
Software and Systems Engineering Standards: Verification and Validation of Sy...VICTOR MAESTRE RAMIREZ
 
CCS355 Neural Networks & Deep Learning Unit 1 PDF notes with Question bank .pdf
CCS355 Neural Networks & Deep Learning Unit 1 PDF notes with Question bank .pdfCCS355 Neural Networks & Deep Learning Unit 1 PDF notes with Question bank .pdf
CCS355 Neural Networks & Deep Learning Unit 1 PDF notes with Question bank .pdfAsst.prof M.Gokilavani
 
Piping Basic stress analysis by engineering
Piping Basic stress analysis by engineeringPiping Basic stress analysis by engineering
Piping Basic stress analysis by engineeringJuanCarlosMorales19600
 
US Department of Education FAFSA Week of Action
US Department of Education FAFSA Week of ActionUS Department of Education FAFSA Week of Action
US Department of Education FAFSA Week of ActionMebane Rash
 
Oxy acetylene welding presentation note.
Oxy acetylene welding presentation note.Oxy acetylene welding presentation note.
Oxy acetylene welding presentation note.eptoze12
 
Application of Residue Theorem to evaluate real integrations.pptx
Application of Residue Theorem to evaluate real integrations.pptxApplication of Residue Theorem to evaluate real integrations.pptx
Application of Residue Theorem to evaluate real integrations.pptx959SahilShah
 
computer application and construction management
computer application and construction managementcomputer application and construction management
computer application and construction managementMariconPadriquez1
 
Call Girls Delhi {Jodhpur} 9711199012 high profile service
Call Girls Delhi {Jodhpur} 9711199012 high profile serviceCall Girls Delhi {Jodhpur} 9711199012 high profile service
Call Girls Delhi {Jodhpur} 9711199012 high profile servicerehmti665
 
Earthing details of Electrical Substation
Earthing details of Electrical SubstationEarthing details of Electrical Substation
Earthing details of Electrical Substationstephanwindworld
 
Instrumentation, measurement and control of bio process parameters ( Temperat...
Instrumentation, measurement and control of bio process parameters ( Temperat...Instrumentation, measurement and control of bio process parameters ( Temperat...
Instrumentation, measurement and control of bio process parameters ( Temperat...121011101441
 

Recently uploaded (20)

Introduction to Machine Learning Unit-3 for II MECH
Introduction to Machine Learning Unit-3 for II MECHIntroduction to Machine Learning Unit-3 for II MECH
Introduction to Machine Learning Unit-3 for II MECH
 
Correctly Loading Incremental Data at Scale
Correctly Loading Incremental Data at ScaleCorrectly Loading Incremental Data at Scale
Correctly Loading Incremental Data at Scale
 
TechTAC® CFD Report Summary: A Comparison of Two Types of Tubing Anchor Catchers
TechTAC® CFD Report Summary: A Comparison of Two Types of Tubing Anchor CatchersTechTAC® CFD Report Summary: A Comparison of Two Types of Tubing Anchor Catchers
TechTAC® CFD Report Summary: A Comparison of Two Types of Tubing Anchor Catchers
 
Electronically Controlled suspensions system .pdf
Electronically Controlled suspensions system .pdfElectronically Controlled suspensions system .pdf
Electronically Controlled suspensions system .pdf
 
Risk Assessment For Installation of Drainage Pipes.pdf
Risk Assessment For Installation of Drainage Pipes.pdfRisk Assessment For Installation of Drainage Pipes.pdf
Risk Assessment For Installation of Drainage Pipes.pdf
 
Indian Dairy Industry Present Status and.ppt
Indian Dairy Industry Present Status and.pptIndian Dairy Industry Present Status and.ppt
Indian Dairy Industry Present Status and.ppt
 
Software and Systems Engineering Standards: Verification and Validation of Sy...
Software and Systems Engineering Standards: Verification and Validation of Sy...Software and Systems Engineering Standards: Verification and Validation of Sy...
Software and Systems Engineering Standards: Verification and Validation of Sy...
 
CCS355 Neural Networks & Deep Learning Unit 1 PDF notes with Question bank .pdf
CCS355 Neural Networks & Deep Learning Unit 1 PDF notes with Question bank .pdfCCS355 Neural Networks & Deep Learning Unit 1 PDF notes with Question bank .pdf
CCS355 Neural Networks & Deep Learning Unit 1 PDF notes with Question bank .pdf
 
POWER SYSTEMS-1 Complete notes examples
POWER SYSTEMS-1 Complete notes  examplesPOWER SYSTEMS-1 Complete notes  examples
POWER SYSTEMS-1 Complete notes examples
 
🔝9953056974🔝!!-YOUNG call girls in Rajendra Nagar Escort rvice Shot 2000 nigh...
🔝9953056974🔝!!-YOUNG call girls in Rajendra Nagar Escort rvice Shot 2000 nigh...🔝9953056974🔝!!-YOUNG call girls in Rajendra Nagar Escort rvice Shot 2000 nigh...
🔝9953056974🔝!!-YOUNG call girls in Rajendra Nagar Escort rvice Shot 2000 nigh...
 
Piping Basic stress analysis by engineering
Piping Basic stress analysis by engineeringPiping Basic stress analysis by engineering
Piping Basic stress analysis by engineering
 
Design and analysis of solar grass cutter.pdf
Design and analysis of solar grass cutter.pdfDesign and analysis of solar grass cutter.pdf
Design and analysis of solar grass cutter.pdf
 
US Department of Education FAFSA Week of Action
US Department of Education FAFSA Week of ActionUS Department of Education FAFSA Week of Action
US Department of Education FAFSA Week of Action
 
Oxy acetylene welding presentation note.
Oxy acetylene welding presentation note.Oxy acetylene welding presentation note.
Oxy acetylene welding presentation note.
 
Application of Residue Theorem to evaluate real integrations.pptx
Application of Residue Theorem to evaluate real integrations.pptxApplication of Residue Theorem to evaluate real integrations.pptx
Application of Residue Theorem to evaluate real integrations.pptx
 
computer application and construction management
computer application and construction managementcomputer application and construction management
computer application and construction management
 
Call Girls Delhi {Jodhpur} 9711199012 high profile service
Call Girls Delhi {Jodhpur} 9711199012 high profile serviceCall Girls Delhi {Jodhpur} 9711199012 high profile service
Call Girls Delhi {Jodhpur} 9711199012 high profile service
 
Exploring_Network_Security_with_JA3_by_Rakesh Seal.pptx
Exploring_Network_Security_with_JA3_by_Rakesh Seal.pptxExploring_Network_Security_with_JA3_by_Rakesh Seal.pptx
Exploring_Network_Security_with_JA3_by_Rakesh Seal.pptx
 
Earthing details of Electrical Substation
Earthing details of Electrical SubstationEarthing details of Electrical Substation
Earthing details of Electrical Substation
 
Instrumentation, measurement and control of bio process parameters ( Temperat...
Instrumentation, measurement and control of bio process parameters ( Temperat...Instrumentation, measurement and control of bio process parameters ( Temperat...
Instrumentation, measurement and control of bio process parameters ( Temperat...
 

Problems on piles and deep footing

  • 1. PROBLEMS ON PILES/DEEP FOOTING Problem # 01 A cast in place concrete pile in medium sand is 0.5 m in dia and 10 m long. The water table is 2 m below the top of the pile. The bulk density of sand above the water table is 1.8 t/m3 . and below the water table the density is 1.95 t/m3 . Angle of shearing resistance is 38o . Assume Nqp = 60 and ks tan δ = 0.5, Dc /B = 8. Determine the ultimate load and the safe load for a pile with F.S = 3.
  • 2. Solution Qf = Qb + Qs (1) Base resistence (Qb ) B = 0.5 m Lp= 10 m Nqp = 60 Dc = ? From table for medium sand, Dc = 8 x B = 8 x 0.5 = 4 m Lp > Dc . fb = σo ′ Nqp Where σo ′ = Effective vertical pressure at Dc . σo ′= (1.8 x 9.8 x 2) + ( (1.95-1) x 9.8 x 2) = 53.9 kPa. fb = 53.9 x 60 = 3234 kPa. Qb = Ab x fb = π/4 B2 x fb . = π/4 x (0.5)2 x 3234 = 635 kN. 2 m Dc = 4 m
  • 3. • (ii) Frictional resistence, Qs Qs = As x fs fs =? The frictional resistence is calculted by considering the pile in three parts, 0-2m, 2 m - 4 m (Dc ) and 4 m – 10 m. The frictional resistence will increase upto Dc only = 4 m. σ′ at 2 m = 2 x 1.8 x 9.8 = 35.28 kPa. σ′ at 4 m = (35.28 + ( 1.95- 1) x 9.8 x 2) = 53.9 kPa. Average vertical stress for 0-2 m = 17.64 kPa. ( 0+ 35.28/2) ∴ Av. fs1 =17.64 x ks tan δ = 17.64 x 0.5 = 8.82 kPa. Av. Stress for 2 m to 4 m = 53.9 + 35.28/2 = 44.59 kPa. ∴ Av. fs2 = σ′s x ks tanδ = 44.59 x 0.5 = 22.3 kPa.
  • 4. • Vertical stress below Dc is assumed constant and equal to 53.9 kPa. • ∴fs3 = 53.9 x 0.5 = 26.95 ( unit skin friction) • ∴Qs = fs1 x πB x D1 + fs2 x πB (Dc – D1) + fs3 πB (Lp - Dc ) • = 8.82 x π x 0.5 x 2 + 22.3 x π x 0.5 x 2 +26.95 x π 0.5 x 6 = 352 kN. • Qf = Qb + Qs = 635 + 352 = 987 kN. • Qa = Qf /3 = 987/3 = 329 kN.
  • 5. Problem # 02 • A cased concrete pile, 0.42 m outside diameter, is driven through 11 m of loose sand and for a depth of 3 m into underlying medium dense sand. The skin friction is measured with a static cone fitted with a friction sleeve; fs = fc(av) = 20 kPa in loose sand and fs = fc(av) = 55 kPa in medium dense sand. The cone resistence at base level is 12000 kPa. Determine the safe load for a pile, using F.S = 2.5.
  • 6. Solution • Qf = Qb + Qs • Qb = π/4 B2 x fb fb = qc = 12000 kPa but limit is 11000 kPa • ∴Qb = π/4 (0.42)2 x 11000 = 1524 kN. • Qs = Qs1 + Qs2 ,Qs1 = through loose sand = 11m • Qs2 = through medium dense sand =3 m. • Qs = πB x 11 x 20 + πB x 3 x 55 • = π x 0.42 x 11 x 20 + π x 0.42 x 3 X 55 = 290.28 + 217.71 • Qf = Qb + Qs = 1524 + 290.28 + 217.71= 2032.0 kN. • Qa = Qf /2.5 = 2032/2.5 = 812.8 kN.
  • 7. Problem # 03 • Determine the penetration depth for a 40 cm dia. Concrete pile which is required to carry load of 900 kN at a safety factor of 2.5. The soil consists of silty sand upto a depth of 10 m in which the average cone resistance (qc)av = 4000 kPa. Silty sand is underlain by dense sand. The average cone resistance increases to 13000 kPa within the depth 10 m to 10.5 m and to 18000 kPa below 10.5 m. to reach full base resistance the pile must be driven to at least 5B, i-e 2 m, in bearing stratum of dense sand.
  • 8. Solution • Try the allowable load for a pile, embedded length 12m. Min. • Qf = Qb + Qs • Qb = fb x Ab • fb = qc = 18000 kPa But limit of fb =11000 kPa • ∴Qb = fb x π/4 B2 = 11000 x (0.42)2 x π/4 = 1381.6 kN. • Now Qs = Qs1 +Qs2 +Qs3. 0-10m 10-10.5m + > 10.5. ∴fs1 = 0-10m = qc av /200 = 4000/200 =20 kPa.
  • 9. • fs2 = 10 – 10.5 = qc av /200 = 13000/200 =65 kPa. • fs3 = 10.5 – 12 = qc av /200 = 18000/200 = 90 kPa. (< 100 kPa) • Qs = π B [(10x20) + (0.5x65) + (1.5x90)] D1 x fs1 D2 x fs2 D3 x fs3 = π x 0.4 ( 200 + 32.5 + 135) = 461.81 kN. Qf = Qb + Qs = 1381.6 + 461.81 = 1 843.41 fs3 x π B x D = 407 D = 407/90 x πx 0.4 = 3.6m. 12 + 3.6 = 15.6 m Qa = Qf /F.S. 1843.41/2.5 =737.36 Qf = Qa x F.S = 900 x 2.5 = 2250. Receiving Load = 2250 – 1843 = 407 kN
  • 10. Problem # 04 • A bored concrete pile 30 cm in dia. And 6.5m long, passes through stiff fissured clay, subjected to seasonal shrinkage and swelling upto a depth of 1.5m. The average undrained strength of clay varies linearly from 50 kPa at 1.5m to 186 kPa at 10m. Find the ultimate load capacity. Assume α = 0.3.
  • 11. Solution • 1.5m top is ignored as the shrinkage may cause all adhesion to be lost. • Cu at 1.5m depth = 50 kPa. • Now cu at base = 50 + 186- 50/8.5 x 5 = 130 kPa • ∴ Average cu = 50 + 130 /2 = 90 kPa. • Qf = fb x Ab + fs As • 1170 x π/4 (0.3)2 + 27 x π x 0.3 x 5 • =82.7 + 127.27 = 210 kN.
  • 12. Problem # 05 (uplift Resistance) • Find the uplift resistance and the safe uplift resistance (F.S = 2.5) of the under reamed pile installed in clay with the following data. (if the top 2m clay is active and subjected to swelling) • Dia of shaft = 40 cm, dia. of bulb at base = 100cm. • Length of shaft above bulb = 5m cu av along shaft = 115 kPa. Cu at base = 150 kPa and adhesion factor α = 0.4
  • 13. Solution • Projected area of bulb = π/4 (Bb – B2)= 0.659 m2 . • Neglecting top 2m of activeness • As = π B x 3 = 3.77 m2 • Qup = 0.659 fb + 3.77 fs [ fb =Nc x cu =9x150=135 fs = α cu = 0.4x 115 = 46] = 0.659x 1350 + 3.77 x 46 = 1063 kN Safe uplift resistance = 1063/2.5 = 425 kN
  • 14. Problem # 06 • Find the penetration depth for a 35cm square R.C pile driven through sea bed for a jetty structure to carry a maximum compressive load of 500 kN and a net uplift load of 300 kN. The soil below sea bed consists of a 10m thick layer of saturated medium dense sand overlying dense sand and gravel. The average corrected SPT blows in the top 10m sand are 12 and on bottom sand gravel layer 40. No erosion is expected. The minimum safety factor should be 2.5 on the uplift load and 4 on the compressive load.
  • 15. Solution • Nav for top10m = 12 (sandy layer) • N in sand –gravel = 40 • Total ultimate uplift resistance required = 2.5x 300 = 750 kN • Now fs (medium dense sand)= 2 Nav = 2x12=24 kPa. • Qs (uplift ) in top 10m = (4x0.35x10)24 = fs x As =336 kN. • Remaiing uplift resistance = 750 – 336 = 44 kN. • Friction resistance per meter length in sand gravel = fs xAs (one meter) • fs (dense gravel) = 2 Nav = 2x 40 = 80 kPa. Friction resistance /meter length = 80 x 4 x 0.35x1 =112 kN/m. Further penetration required in dense gravel to resist the uplift of 414 kN. = 414/112 = 3.7m ∴Total Penetration = 10 + 3.7 = 13.7m for uplift.
  • 16. Check for compressive load. Qf =Qb + Qs. Qb = fb x Ab. fb (dense gravel) = 40 N Lp /B ≤ 400 N. ≤400x40 ≤ 16000 kPa. =40x4x 3.7/0.35= 16914.3 ≤ 16000 kPa. But maximum value of fb which could be adopted = 11000 kPa. ∴ fb = 11000. Now Qb = 11000 x (0.35)2 = 1347.5 kN. Qs is same for compression as for uplift. ∴ Qf = 1347 + 750 = 2097 kN. ∴ F = Qf /Qa = 2097/500 = 4.2 > 4 safe. this indicates that the required penetration is governed by uplift resistance. ∴ Penetration depth = 13.7 m below sea bed level
  • 17. Problem # 07 (Pile load test) • The following data refers to a cyclic pile load test carried out on a 300mm dia. pile 10m long. • Plot the load settlement curves (total and net) and estimate the allowable load by different methods/criterians. Load on pile top (kN) 150 200 250 300 400 500 600 Total settlement on pile top (mm) 1.45 2.25 2.75 3.6 5.75 10.75 30.00 Net settlement on pile top (mm) 0.40 0.65 0.80 1.0 1.70 5.25 22.80
  • 18. Solution • Plot the load vs settlement ( Arithmatic graph) • Plot the load vs Net settlement(Arth. graph) • (a) Two third of the load causing 12 mm settlement, that is • Qa = 2/3 x 500 = 333.33 kN • (b) 50% of the load causing • Total settlement equal to 10% • Of the pile dia. i.e settlement of • 30mm (i.e 600 kN) • Qa = 1/2 x 600 = 300 kN. • (c) Net settlement 6mm 2/3 rd of that • 2/3 x 550 = 1100/3 = 366.66 kN • (d) Falling to striaght line Qu 600 kN, use F.S =2. • 600/2 = 300 • Least of the above is 300 kN Load Settlement
  • 19. Problem # 08 • Two independent loading tests on 300mm dia. Short bored piles in clay for which φ = 0, yielded the following results. • Embedded length of pile Added load at failure (kN) • 2.15 100 • 2.75 110 • Assuming the adhesion is effective over the whole of the embedded length, estimate the mean cohesion of the soil and the shaft adhesion factor to be used in extrapolating the test results to larger piles. The densities of the soil and concrete are 1.92 Mg/m3 and 2.40 Mg/m3 respectively.
  • 20. Solution: • At point of failure ∑ v =0 • γs = 1.92 Mg/m3 • γc = 2.4 Mg/m3. Qb + Qs = P + • (wt. of pile – wt. of excavated material) • Now P = 100 kN Lp = 2.15m. • Qb + Qs = c Ncp x Ab + α c As = c Ncp x π/4xd2 + α c xπ x d x Lp. • = c x 9x π/4 x 0.32 + α c x π x 0.3 x 2.15 = 0.636 c + 2.027 α c • Ncp = 9 (Lp /d > 4) • P = 100 + wt. of pile – wt. of excavated material • = 100 + (2.4- 1.92) x 9.81 (π/4 x 0.32 x 2.15) • = 100 + 0.715 Wt. P Qs Qb
  • 21. • ∑ v = 0 • ∴ 100.715 = 0.636 c + 2.027 α c -----------(i) • Similarly for 2nd test results ∑ v = 0 • Qb + Qs =9x c x π/4 (0.3)2 + α c xπ x 0.3 x2.75 • = 0.636 c + 2.592 α c • Load = 110 + (2.4 – 1.92) x 9.81 (π/4 x 0.32 x 2.75) • = 110 + 0.915 = 110.915 • 110.915 = 0.636 c + 2.592 α c ---------------------(ii) • Solve equation simultaneously • ∴ α c = 18.06 , c = 100 and αααα = 0.18
  • 22. Problem # 09 • A free standing, square group of 16 piles extends to a depth of 12 m in stiff clay which is underlain by rock at 24 m depth. The piles are 0.5 m in diameter and are spaced at 1.5 m centre's. cT at base = 140 kPa, average (cT)av along shaft = 90 kPa, adhesion α = 0.45, coefficient of volume decrease mv below base = 0.08 m2/MN, remolded cT along shaft = 50 kPa. Assume group efficiency Eg = 0.65. Find the allowable load for the group with F = 2.5. Also estimate the settlement under the allowable load.
  • 23. Solution: • (a) Considering individual piles. fb = cT Ncp = 140 x 9 = 1260 kPa fs = α cT = 0.45 x 90 = 40.5 kPa Qf = π/4 B2 fb + B Lp fs = π/4 0.52 x 1260 + π x 0.5 x 12 x 40.5 = 247.4 + 763.4 = 1010.8 kN Qg = Eg .n Qf = 0.65 x 16 x 1010.8 = 10512 kN (b)Considering block failure. QB = Bo Lo fb + 2 Lp ( Bo +Lo) fB ; Bo = Lo = 5 m, Lp = 12 m fb = cT Ncp = 140 x 9 =1260 kPa fs = cT ( remolded) = 50 kPa QB = 43500 kN > Qg (31500 + 12000) Qa = 1/2.5 Qg = 10512/2.5 = 4205 kN
  • 24. • For a settlement the load is assumed to act at an equivalent raft (5 m x 5 m) located at 12/3 = 4 m above the base. The compressible zone of 16 m thickness is divided into 4 layers, each 4 m thick. Pressure increase at the middle of each layer is calculated by assuming 2:1 spread of load Qs. The calculations are given in table. The total settlement is 48 mm.
  • 25. Layer Mid-depth (m) Area (m2 ) ∆σ∆σ∆σ∆σ (kPa) mv ∆σ∆σ∆σ∆σ H (mm) 1 2 49 85.80 27.45 2 6 121 34.75 11.12 3 10 225 18.68 5.97 4 14 361 11.65 3.73 48.28
  • 26. Problem # 10 • A 40-ft-long precast pile is fully embedded in sand. The cross section of pile measures 12 in x 12 in. The allowable working load for the pile is 80 kip and 54 kip is contributed by skin friction. Determine the elastic settlement of the pile. Ep = 3 x 106 lb/in2 , Es = 4500 lb/in2 , and µs = 0.3.
  • 28. ( )( ) ( )( ) ( ) .71.0287.0358.0065.0 .287.021.4)3.01( 1000 4500 12 40124 54 21.4 0.1 40 35.0235.02 )1( .38.082.03.01 1000 4500 1218.0 2 3 2 3 2 2 ins issettlementtotaltheHence ins So D L I I E D pL Q s ins So ws wss s ws =++= =−      × = =+=+= −      = =−       × = µ
  • 29. Problem # 11 Refer to Figure 8.47 which shows the plan of a pile group. Each pile has a square cross section measuring 12 in x 12 in. the center-to- center spacing of the piles is 30 in. Determine the group efficiency of the piles by using: a. Eq. (8.112) b. Eq. (8.114)
  • 31. Solution: • Part a: Using Eq. (8.112) • ( ) ( )( ) ( )( )( ) %4.60604.0 3418 48302342 .,484,12,3,4 422 21 21 21 == +−+ = ===== +−+ = η η inDpandinDnnFor npn Ddnn
  • 32. • Part b: Using Eq. (8.114) ( ) ( ) ( )( ) ( )( ) ( )( )( ) ( ) %.7.65657.08.21 4390 4233 1 8.21 30 12 tantan tan 90 11 1 11 1 21 1221 ==      + −= =      =                  −+− −= −− − o o So d D d D nn nnnn η η
  • 34. Solution: • From Eq. (8.116), [ ] ( )( ) ( )( ) ( )( )( )( )( ) ( )( )( )( )[ ] ( ) kN Q So mkNcforFigureFrom mp mA LpccAnnQ u u p upupu 1038703.80759.5812 157022.163.070093.0934 .63.0,/7019.8 22.1305.04 093.0305.0305.0 9 2 2 2 )(21 ≈+= +=Σ == == == ∆Σ+=Σ α α
  • 35. • Again from Eq. (8.117), the ultimate block capacity is Lg Bg cu(p) Nc*+∑2(Lg +Bg) cu ∆L, So • Lg = (n1 – 1)d +2(D/2) = (4-1)(1.22)+ 0.305=3.965 m • Bg = (n2-1)d + 2(D/2) = (3-1)(1.22)+ 0.305= 2.745 m • L/Bg = 15/2.745= 5.46 • Lg /Bg = 3.965/2.745 = 1.44 • From Figure 7.16, Nc*≈ 8.6. Thus • Block capacity = (3.965)(2.745)(70)(8.6) + 2(3.965 + 2.745)(70)(15) = 6552 + 14091 = 20643 kN • So • Qg(u) 10,387 kN < 20,643 kN • Qg(all) = Qg(u) /FS = 10,387/4 ≈ 2597 kN.
  • 36. Problem # 14 • A group pile in clay is shown in Fig. Determine the consolidation settlement of the pile groups. All clays are normally consolidated.
  • 37. 6 ft 48 ft 3 ft 27 ft 21 ft 12 ft 6 ft 2v:1H2v:1H z 45 ft 30 ft Water table Qg = 500 kip Clay γsat = 115 lb/ft3 eo = 0.82 Cc = 0.3 γsat = 120lb/ft3 eo = 0.7 Cc = 0.2 γsat = 122 lb/ft3 eo = 0.75 Cc = 0.25 Clay Clay sand γ = 105 lb/ft3 Rock Po(1), ∆p(1) Po(2), ∆p(2) Po(3), ∆p(3) Pile group: Lg = 9ft; Bg = 6ft
  • 38. Solution: • The stress distribution pattern is shown in Figure 8.49. Hence • ( )( ) ( )( ) ( )( ) ( )( ) ( )( ) ( )( ) ( )( ) ( ) ( )( ) .45.87.0 2603 15542603 log 82.01 213.0 /26034.62115 2 21 271056 log 1 /265 366369 1000500 /421 276279 1000500 /1554 2 21 6 2 21 9 1000500 1 2 )1( )1( )1()1( )1( 1)1( 1 2 )3( 2 )2( 2 11 )1( infts ftlbp p pp e HC s ftlbp ftlbp ftlb zBzL Q p o o o o c gg g ==      + + =∆ =−      ++=         ∆+ + =∆ = ++ =∆ = ++ =∆ =       +      + = ++ =∆
  • 39. ( )( ) ( )( ) ( )( ) ( )( ) ( )( ) ( )( ) ( )( ) ( )( ) ( )( ) .58.929.084.045.8, 29.0024.0 4025 2654025 log 75.01 625.0 /40254.621223 4.62120124.62115481056 84.0 3500 4213500 log 7.01 122.0 /35004.6212064.6211521271056 log 1 3 2 )3( 2 2 )2( )2( )2()2( )2( 2)2( 2 inssettlementTotal infts ftlb p ins ftlbp p pp e HC s g o o o o o c =++=∆ ≈=    + + =∆ =− +−+−+= =      + + =∆ =−+−++=         ∆+ + =∆
  • 40. Problem # 15 • It is proposed to carry the load from a column on 350 mm diameter bored piles. The total load to be carried is 2000 kN and the soil consists of a deep deposit of clay having the following properties: • If the piles are • about 9 m long, • Estimate the • Number reqired • And suggest how • they should be • arranged Depth (m) Undrained shear strength (kN/m2) 0 100 3 110 6 125 9 125 12 135
  • 41. Solution: • Consider the ultimate load carried on pile: • Qf = Qb + Qs • Taking average cu on shaft of pile as = 115 kN/m2 and an adhesion factor of 0.45 for a bored pile: • Qf = 125 x 9 x (π/4 x 0.352) + 115 x 0.45 x (π x0.35 x 9) • = 108 + 512 = 620 kN • Using a factor of safety of 3: Qa = 620/3 = 207 kN • ∴ No of piles required to carry 2000 kN = 2000/207 = 9.6 • Say 9 piles which reduces the factor of safety slightly. •
  • 42. • Bored piles should be spaced at about 3 times their diameter and a suggested arrangement is shown on Fig. • The action of the group • Must be checked for stability. Consider a pier 2.35 m square: Qfg = 125 x 9 x 2.352 +115 x 0.45 x (4 x 2.35 x 9) = 6212 + 4378 = 10590 kN 1 m 2.35 m 1 m