1.
CONNECTING OPPORTUNITY AND YOU.
Canadian Uranium Exploration
& The Athabasca Basin
TSXv: ZC
FSE: ZCT1
January 2014 / www.zimtu.com
TSXv:ZC / FSE:ZCT1 / www.zimtu.com

2.
DISCLAIMER
Disclaimers and Cautionary Statements. The information contained in this presentation is provided by Zimtu Capital Corp. (“Zimtu”) for informational purposes
only and does not constitute an offer to issue or arrange to issue, or the solicitation of an offer to issue, securities of Zimtu or other financial products. The
information contained herein is not investment or financial product advice and is not intended to be used as the basis for making an investment decision.
The views, opinions and advice provided in this presentation reflect those of the individual presenters, and are provided for information purposes only. The
presentation has been prepared without taking into account the investment objectives, financial situation or particular needs of any particular person. No
representation or warranty, express or implied, is made as to the fairness, accuracy, completeness or correctness of the information, opinions and conclusions
contained in this presentation. To the maximum extent permitted by law, none of Zimtu nor its directors, officers, employees or agents, nor any other person
accepts any liability, including, without limitation, any liability arising out of fault or negligence, for any loss arising from the use of the information contained
in this presentation.
Except for statements of historical fact, this presentation contains certain “forward-looking information” within the meaning of applicable securities laws.
Forward-looking information is frequently characterized by words such as “plan”, “expect”, “project”, “intend”, “believe”, “anticipate”, “estimate” and other
similar words, or statements that certain events or conditions “may” or “will” occur. Forward-looking statements are based on the opinions and estimates of
management at the date the statements are made, and are subject to a variety of risks and uncertainties and other factors that could cause actual events or
results to differ materially from those anticipated in the forward-looking statements, including, among others, Zimtu’s future growth and development, the
ability to create value through mineral property transactions, the proposed plans of any of Zimtu’s equity holdings, as well as those risk factors identified
in Zimtu’s Filing Statement dated July 25, 2008 and other disclosure documents available at www.sedar.com under Zimtu’s name. Zimtu undertakes no
obligation to update forward-looking information if circumstances or management’s estimates or opinions should change except as required by law. The reader
is cautioned not to place undue reliance on forward-looking statements.
This presentation includes information provided to Zimtu Capital Corp. by each of the respective equity holdings (the “Third Party Information”). Zimtu believes
that all of these sources are reliable, but Zimtu has not independently verified any of this information and cannot guarantee its accuracy or completeness.
Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on the Third Party Information and are directed to review the respective SEDAR filings of each company at
www.sedar.com.
This presentation does not constitute an offer of shares for sale in the United States or to any person that is, or is acting for the account or benefit of, any
U.S. person (as defined in Regulation S under the United States Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”) (“U.S. Person”), or in any other
jurisdiction in which such an offer would be illegal. Zimtu’s shares have not been and will not be registered under the Securities Act.
TSXv:ZC / FSE:ZCT1 / www.zimtu.com

3.
No Place Like Home
Source: Luke Schuss
TSXv:ZC / FSE:ZCT1 / www.zimtu.com

4.
Introduction
Talking Points
1. Electricity Demand – a seat at the table for
nuclear energy
2. The Commercial Nuclear Industry – future
outlook has everything coming up roses?
3. The Commercial Nuclear Industry – contenders
emerge
4. Reactor Builds – China is the major growth
driver
140%
Global Electricity Growth, 1985-2012
120%
Electricity Generation
100%
Nuclear
80%
60%
40%
20%
0%
5. Zimtu’s Global Uranium Demand Projections –
scenario analysis
6. The Athabasca Basin – the ultimate winner and
why the region deserves your respect
7. Conclusion – Grade is King
1985
1988
1991
1994
1997
2000
2003
2006
2009
2012
Source: BP Statistical Review 2013
Electricity Generating Capacity 15-yr CAGR (2010-2025)
Institutional
forecasts
US eia
BP
Exxon Mobil
Average
Total electricity
Nuclear
2.6%
2.4%
2.0%
2.3%
3.4%
1.4%
2.3%
2.4%
Renewables (exhydro)
3.7%
10.0%
5.6%
6.4%
Natural gas
TSXv:ZC / FSE:ZCT1 / www.zimtu.com
2.2%
2.2%
2.3%
2.2%

5.
Global Nuclear Reactor Trends
45
Construction starts
Grid connections
35
Permanent shutdowns
Three Mile Island
Cancelled Constructions
25
15
COMPANY
BUILDING
Private to Public
5
Chernobyl
PROJECT
GENERATION
Zimtu locates and acquires Fukushima
mineral properties of
Merit and connects them
With public resource
companies
-5
-15
Source: IAEA|PRIS
TSXv:ZC / FSE:ZCT1 / www.zimtu.com

6.
The Bright Future for Commercial Nuclear Energy
IEA Global Forecast Generating Capacity Required by 2035 (GW)
2010
2035
Required Increase
NPS*
450 S**
NPS*
Nuclear Reactor Overview
450 S**
Hydro
1027
1629
1803
59%
76%
Wind
195
1102
1685
465%
764%
Solar PV
28
499
901
1682%
3118%
Nuclear
393
633
865
61%
Number of Net Capacity Net MW
reactors
(GWe)
per reactor
120%
Operational
Source: IEA’s World Energy Outlook 2011
855
71
70
981
Permanent
Shutdown
*New Policy Scenario (NPS) = IEA base case
** 450 Scenario (450 S) = probable achievement in reduction of global warming
374
Under
construction
Nuclear current capacity = 374GW
438
147
55
375
Source: IAEA|PRIS
OECD LCOE Ranges, 2010 (USD/MWh)
Technology*
5%
Nuclear
29-82
Wind, onshore
48-163
Gas**
67-105
Coal**
54-120
*Solar not included as sample population too small
**Includes carbon price of $30/tonne
Discount rate
Given a low discount rate,
nuclear is competitive with
other electricity generating
technologies using a
levelized cost comparison.
10%
42-137
70-234
76-120
67-142
Source: IEA/NEA/OECD
TSXv:ZC / FSE:ZCT1 / www.zimtu.com

7.
Smooth Sailing Ahead
25
US 2012 Electricity Production Costs
(cents per KWh)
20
Coal
15
Gas
OECD Overnight Construction Costs, 2010
Pre-financing Investment as share of total
Construction
costs*
Technology
charges
period (years)
(USD/kW)
5%
10%
Nuclear
1600-5900
60%
75%
N/A
Wind
1900-3700
77%
87%
1-2
Gas
520-1800
12%
16%
2-3
*Investment includes financing but excludes future liabilities for clean-up
**Onshore
Source: IEA/NEA/OECD
Nuclear
Annual Nuclear Consumption
200
Petroleum
Russia
10
Terawatt-hours
150
5
Korea
100
China
50
India
0
0
1994
Source: Nuclear Energy Institute
1997
2000
2003
2006
2009
2012
Source: BP Statistical Review 2013
TSXv:ZC / FSE:ZCT1 / www.zimtu.com

8.
Nuclear reactors and historic U3O8 spot price up to 2014
500
$160
$140
400
$120
$100
300
$80
200
$60
$40
100
$20
0
$0
Operable
Under
Planned
Proposed
Construction
China
US
World ex US & China
Source: IAEA|PRIS, WNA
Source: Cameco
TSXv:ZC / FSE:ZCT1 / www.zimtu.com

9.
Lurking Under the Surface
Largest Consumers of Nuclear Energy
Annual Nuclear Consumption
900
USA
Peak Consumption
(corresponding to
2768 TWh
left margin)
World
2010
World
2012
2477 TWh
USA
France
Japan
Russia
Terawatt-hours
Japan
Germany
0
1984
1991
1998
2005
32.7%
17.2%
7.2%
6.1%
5.4%
5.1%
3.2%
2011
2001
2006
Germany
China
Canada
4.0%
3.9%
3.9%
3.2%
2007
Ukraine
3.9%
Four countries – the US, France, Japan, and
Russia represented 63% of total nuclear energy
consumption in 2010.
300
1977
USA
France
Russia
Korea
Ukraine
France
2010
2005
1998
2012
Korea
Germany
Canada
600
30.7%
15.5%
10.6%
6.2%
2012
Uranium demand over the next 10 years will
be a function of the traditional “big 4” and a
new entrant – China
Source: BP Statistical Review 2013
TSXv:ZC / FSE:ZCT1 / www.zimtu.com

10.
Uranium Demand: age becoming material
35
Weighted-average Age of Reactors Worldwide
35
Other, 197
30
25
USA, 100
number of reactors
Total net electrical
generating capacity
25
Number of Reactors
30
20
15
France, 58
20
DISCOVERY
SPECULATION
DEVELOPMENT
INVESTMENT ANALYSIS
PRODUCTION
RE-VALUATION
15
Russia, 33
10
Japan*, 50
10
5
5
0
0
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44
Age (Years)
Source: IAEA|PRIS
TSXv:ZC / FSE:ZCT1 / www.zimtu.com
Gigawatts of Capacity
Regional Breakdown of
Operational Reactors

11.
Energy Consumption: Nuclear vs Wind + Solar
3,000
Nuclear
20%
Wind & Solar
18%
16%
14%
2,000
TWh
12%
1,500
10%
8%
1,000
6%
4%
500
2%
0
0%
1996
1998
2000
2002
2004
2006
2008
2010
2012
Source: BP Statistical Review 2013
TSXv:ZC / FSE:ZCT1 / www.zimtu.com
nuclear % of glabal electricity
2,500

12.
Reactor Constructions: Regional issues
Median Reactor Construction Duration
Reactors Under Construction,
Regional Breakdown
Reactor grid connections 1981-1995 Reactor grid connections 1996-2012
Number of
reactors
Median construction
duration (years)
10
5.25
12
4.65
China
3
6.08
14
5.15
Japan
28
3.90
8
3.82
USA
48
11.43
1
N/A
Total
China, 28
Number of
reactors
Korea
Other, 22
Median construction
duration (years)
245
8.17
65
7.58
Source: IAEA|PRIS
Expected Reactor Connections to Grid
Korea, 5
2013
India, 6
Source: IAEA|PRIS
2015
Number of reactors
14
17
13
China
Russia,
10
2014
7
8
8
Actual
4
1
Source: WNA
TSXv:ZC / FSE:ZCT1 / www.zimtu.com

13.
Uranium Production Sensitivity Analysis
End of 2013
Currently
Operable
Number of
reactors
435
Base Case, 2040 Outlook
New grid
198
connections
permanent
shutdowns
Results
119
514
million pounds of U3O8
0
Additional U3O8 Production
Requirements
Growth
18%
28%
219
90
-100%
46%
171
21
150
Best Case, 2040 Outlook
Reactor Secondary Mining New grid
needs
Supply
est. connections
219
Median global
Supply from
Mining
reactor
downblend of
production
requirements
HEU
est.
million pounds of U3O8
permanent
shutdowns
Results
294
119
610
Reactor
needs
Secondary
Supply
Worst Case, 2040 Outlook
Mining
est.
260
0
Reactor Secondary Mining
needs
Supply
est.
330
million pounds of U3O8
Results
260
198
permanent
shutdowns
million pounds of U3O8
New grid
connections
303
129
20
Additional U3O8 Production Requirements
131
Additional U3O8 Production Requirements
Growth
73%
Growth
40%
52%
-100%
-30%
-24%
-7%
109
(41)
-27%
The Athabasca Basin in Northern Saskatchewan, hosts the highest grade uranium deposits in the world
and substantial existing infrastructure. This is an attractive proposition for uranium exploration.
Source: IEA’s WEO 2011 and ZC estimates
TSXv:ZC / FSE:ZCT1 / www.zimtu.com

14.
Spot price U3O8 and Canadian Uranium Exploration (millions of USD)
100
90
80
70
400
We anticipate 2013 to be a trough for
Canadian uranium exploration
expenditures, rebounding strongly by
approximately 70% by 2018, following a
nominal price increase of 76% for uranium
350
300
250
60
50
200
40
150
30
100
20
50
10
0
0
Source: Cameco, NRC, Federal Reserve, and ZC estimates
TSXv:ZC / FSE:ZCT1 / www.zimtu.com

15.
The Athabasca Basin
Spot Price Estimates
Identified Resources of U3O8
Annual mean
Zimtu
2013
39.74
2014
48.75
2015
54.03
2016
59.85
2017
65.74
2018
69.89
Cost Ranges Adjusted for Mining Inflation per pound U3O8
< $18
Australia
Kazakhstan
Russia
Canada
Namibia
USA
Niger
World total
< $36
< $59
< $117
-
3,508.1
4,319.8
4,520.5
123.2
1,263.0
1,635.5
2,131.0
-
144.0
1,266.6
1,690.6
912.0
1,083.6
1,218.5
1,597.3
-
17.2
678.5
1,346.9
-
101.7
539.2
1,227.4
14.3
14.3
1,094.5
1,158.2
1,770.2
8,003.4
13,849.5
18,449.6
2013 expected global reactor requirements = 168.9 million pounds U 3O8
Source: OECD Uranium Red Book 2011 and ZC estimates
The Athabasca Basin is
the global low-cost
uranium supplier. The
Basin will profit from
exploration dollars
transitioning out of high
cost regions in Africa,
Kazakhstan, and
Australia.
TSXv:ZC / FSE:ZCT1 / www.zimtu.com

16.
Conclusion: Grade is King
Supply of Uranium As Per The World Nuclear
Association Website
Very high-grade ore (Canada) - 20% U
200,000 ppm U
High-grade ore - 2% U,
20,000 ppm U
Low-grade ore - 0.1% U,
1,000 ppm U
Very low-grade ore* (Namibia) - 0.01% U
Athabasca Basin Sample Deposit
Depths
Projects
Mean Approximate Depths
(meters)
McArthur River
530-640
Cigar Lake
410-450
100 ppm U
Roughrider
225-350
Granite
3-5 ppm U
Shea Creek
650-850
Sedimentary rock
2-3 ppm U
PLS
50-300
Earth's continental crust (av)
2.8 ppm U
Seawater
0.003 ppm U
Source: Cameco, Denison, Hathor, FCU
Source WNA
Largest High Grade Mines in the World
Mine
Average Grade U3O8
McArthur River
Cigar Lake
The Athabasca Basin is the global lowcost uranium supplier. This competitive
advantage is extremely important and
will drive investment dollar to the
region.
16.89%
18.30%
Source: Cameco
TSXv:ZC / FSE:ZCT1 / www.zimtu.com

17.
CONTACT
1450 – 789 W Pender St., Vancouver, BC V6C 1H2 / Toll-Free 1.877.377.6222 / Ph: 604.681.1568 / info@zimtu.com
David Hodge
Sven Olsson
Sean Charland
President & Director
Director
Director
Ph: 604.681.1568 Ext. 223
Ph: +49 7161 290 967
Ph: 647.926.7326
dhodge@zimtu.com
solsson@zimtu.com
scharland@zimtu.com
Vancouver, Canada
Stuttgart, Germany
Toronto, Canada
TSXv:ZC / FSE:ZCT1 / www.zimtu.com