Lars johansson
โขDownload as PPTX, PDFโข
1 likeโข733 views
Presentation at ACES: A Community on Ecosystem Services. "Practical Applications of Social-ecological Urbanism (ecosystem services) within a Liveable City Framework"
Recommended
More Related Content
What's hot
What's hot (13)
Viewers also liked
Viewers also liked (20)
Similar to Lars johansson
Similar to Lars johansson (20)
More from Lars Johansson
Recently uploaded
Recently uploaded (20)
Lars johansson
- 1. LEVERAGING ECOSYSTEMS FOR LIVEABLE COMMUNITIES PRACTICAL APPLICATIONS OF SOCIAL-ECOLOGICAL URBANISM (ECOSYSTEM SERVICES) WITHIN A LIVEABLE CITY FRAMEWORK LARS JOHANSSON, LOTTIE CARLSSON AND INGRID BOKLUND
- 2. SCIENCEโฆ
- 3. A NEW PARADIGM FOR SUSTAINABILITYโฆ โฆPLANETARY BOUNDARIES AND HUMAN OPPORTUNITIES
- 4. LIVEABLE CITIES MAKING CITIES LIVEABLE BLUE-GREEN NFRASTRUCTURE AND ITS IMPACT ON SOCIETY HERBERT DREISEITL AND BETTINA WANSCHURA (RAMBOLL LIVEABLE CITIES LAB), MATTHIAS WรRLEN AND MANFRED MOLDASCHL (ZEPPELIN UNIVERSITY) AND JAMES WESCOAT (MIT) 2016 PLANNING & URBAN DESIGN, RAMBOLL 2015
- 5. SOCIAL-ECOLOGICAL URBANISM PRINCIPLES OF SOCIAL-ECOLOGICAL URBANISM โ CASE STUDY ALBANO CAMPUS, STOCKHOLM BARTHEL ET AL, 2013
- 6. ECOSYSTEM SERVICES MAKING THE VALUE OF ECOSYSTEM SERVICES VISIBLE - PROPOSALS TO ENHANCE WELL-BEING THROUGH BIODIVERSITY AND ECOSYSTEM SERVICES SUMMARY OF SOU 2013:68, STOCKHOLM 2013 CICES, MEA, TEEB & PRINCIPLES OF SOCIAL-ECOLOGICAL URBANISM CICES
- 7. Liveable Cities Social Cultural Physical Social services & Welfare Diversity & Tolerance Flexibel labor market & work conditions Equity & Justice Local/ regional economy Diverse employment & industry sectors Pro-active policy development & involvment Safety & community Education & Research Health & Wellbeing Individuality Cultural identity Inspiration & Art Happiness & Satisfaction Character of the city Transport, mobility & connectivity Energy Buildings, housing, open space & infrastructure Natural resources: water, air, soil Local climate, soundscape & acess to nature Food systems Section Group Ecosystem services Reference ProvisioningServices Food Cultivated crops MA/T/C x Reared animals and their outputs MA/T/C x Wild plants, algea and their outputs MA/T/C x Wild animals and their outputs MA/T/C x Plants and algea from in-situ aquaculture MA/T/C x Animals from in-situ aquaculture MA/T/C x Water Surface water for drinking MA/T/C x x x Groundwater for drinking MA/T/C x x x Water for non-drinking purposes MA/T/C x x Biotic Raw Materials Fibre, timber MA/T/C x x x Genetic resources MA/T/C x x x Medicinal resources MA/T x x x Ornamental resources MA/T/C x x Biochemicals MA/C x x x Bio-energy Biomass based energy sources MA/T/C x x RegulatingServices Regulation of the physical environment Air quality regulation MA/T/C x x x Global climate regulation MA/T/C x x Regional and local climate regulation MA/T/C x x x Water purification & treatment MA/T/C x x x Regulation of water flows MA/T/C x x x x x Flood protection MA/T/C x x x x x Natural hazard regulation MA/C x x x x x Erosion prevention MA/T/C x x x x x Noise reduction NV x x x x Maintanence of biotic conditions Disease regulation MA/T/C x x Pest regulation MA/T/C x x x Lifecycle maintenance, habitat and gene pool protection T/C x x x Maintenance of nursery services T/C x x Pollination MA/T/C x x x Seed dispersial C x x x Mediation of waste, toxics and other nuisances Bio-remediation MA/C x x x Filtration, sequestration, accumulation, dilution by ecosystems MA/C x x x Carbon caption and storage MA/T/C x x x CulturalServices Symbolic Cultural Heritage MA/T/C x x x x x x Natural Heritage C x x x x x x Sacred and/or religious values MA/T/C x x x x x x x x Physical and experiental interactions Sence of place MA/T/C x x x x x x x x x x Educational values MA/T/C x x x x x Scientific resources T/C x x x Aesthetic values MA/T/C x x x x x x Recreation MA/T x x x x x x x Tourism MA/T/C x x x x x x x Outdoor life T/C x x x x x x x x x x x x Health T/C x x x x x x x x x x Social relations MA x x x x x x x x x x x Urban Accessibility P x x? x x? x x x x x x x x x x Openness P x x x? x x x x x x x Recreational attractiveness P x? x x x x x x x x Diversity P x x? x x? x x x x x x x x x x Security P x x? x x? x x x x x x Internationally competitive P x x x x? x x x x x x Knowledge sharing MA/P x x x? x? x x x x SupportingServices Primary production MA/T x x Photosynthesis MA/T x x Soil formation and composition MA/T/C x x Water cycling MA/C x x x Nutrient cycling MA/C x x x Biodiversity R x x x x Maintenancy of life cycles of migratory species T/C x x x Nursery service T x x x Habitats for species T/C x x x x x Renewable energy (wind, water, sun) C x x x x Abiotic products and materials T/C x x Ecosystem Services Liveable Cities Indicators
- 10. Strategies & Pre-Design Planning & Design Construction Maintenance Uppsala Knivsta Norrtรคlje Malmรถ Alingsรฅs
- 11. NORRTรLJE HARBOR USING AN ECOSYSTEM SERVICES PERSPECTIVE AND BIOTOPE AREA FACTOR AS TOOLS FOR SUSTAINABLE URBAN DEVELOPMENT 2015-2016 NORRTรLJE MUNICIPALITY Norrtรคlje Harbour ยฉ Nortรคlje Kommun
- 12. โฆFOR KIDS, BOATS AND SWIMMING!
- 13. 1. SITUATION ANALYSIS Which ecosystem services are present on site / in and surrounding the area today? 2. PRIORITIZE Which ecosystem services are important to the area and its stakeholders, now and in the future? 3. ASSESEMENT Which ecosystem services need to be: protected / strengthened / created when the port area is developed? 4. IMPLEMENTATION ๏ Input to target variables for biotope area factor. ๏ Input to layout and design of the public space in Norrtรคlje Harbor. SITUATION ANALYSIS PRIORITIZE ASSESEMENT IMPLEMENTATION
- 14. BIOTOPE AREA FACTOR eco-efficient area total area
- 15. NOLTORP PROMOTING ECOSYSTEM SERVICES VIA SOCIAL-ECOLOGICAL URBAN DEVELOPMENT 2014 ALINGSร S MUNICIPALITY
- 16. CHALLENGE โข To visualize the value and ability of ecosystem services to deliver necessary social and ecological services in an urban context. โข To describe how social and ecological stakeholders, processes and networks must be mapped and analyzed in order to develop sustainable and resilient cities. โข To translate this into concrete solutions. STRATEGY 1. SITUATION ANALYSIS โข Mapping of biotopes and habitats โข Mapping / typology classification of land use 2. SOCIAL-ECOLOGICAL ANALYSIS โข Identify clusters of ESS for different types of land use โข Calculate and quantify the potential value of ESS 3. DESIGN โข Multifunctionality!
- 17. VISUALIZATION NOLTORP: A SOCIO- ECOLOGICAL NETWORK โข Target variables based on goals and visions for the project โข Ecosystem services that contribute to achieving the objectives โข Stakeholders and processes that are supplying identified ecosystem services โข Examples of design components for facilitating the network of stakeholders and processes Noltorp ยฉAllingsรฅs Kommun
- 18. RESULTS โข A broad understanding on how the city can be shaped to increase the value of ecosystem services โข A single document that describes and analyzes the social and ecological values โข A pedagogical and visually attractive basis for decision support โข Concrete design proposals that are to be implemented in the future work โข Input to the development strategy for Noltorp
- 19. KNIVSTA ECOSYSTEM SERVICES AND CHILDRENโS LOCAL NATURE 2016 KNIVSTA MUNICIPALITY
- 20. KNIVSTA MUNICIPALITY, SWEDEN Effect Areas important for children and young people in the municipality of Knivsta are made visible in municipal planning. Areas linked to cultural and urban ecosystem services are made visible. Understanding the values provided by the city near nature. Challenge To map urban nature areas where children play on a weekly basis. To analyze accessibility and barriers in the city from a children's perspective. Ecosystem Services provided by these areas: Educational values Recreation Health Social relations
- 21. ELINEGร RD INTEGRATION OF AN ECOSYSTEMS SERVICE PERSPECTIVE IN URBAN PLANNING 2016 IKANO BOSTAD (SISTER COMPANY TO IKEA), MALMร
- 22. PLAN STUDIES AND FIELD VISITS WORKSHOP SITUATION ANALYSIS STRATEGIES WORKFLOW LOTTIE CARLSSON, RAMBOLL
- 23. Turnover of theory of ecosystem services to site- specific solutions that includes combined ecological, social and economic functions to create added value. MULTIFUNCTIONAL DESIGN LOTTIE CARLSSON, RAMBOLL
- 24. UPPSALA USING ESS AS A TOOL FOR STAKEHOLDER COPPERATION AND JOINT MANAGEMENT 2016-2017 UPPSALAHEM, CITY OF UPPSALA, CHURCH OF SWEDEN, SWEDISH AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY
- 25. PARTNERS โข City of Uppsala โข Uppsalahem (Public Housing Company) โข Church of Sweden โข Swedish Agricultural University โข Ramboll
- 26. SCOPE OF PROJECT SITUATION ANALYSIS COMMUNITY OUTREACH DEVELOP INDICATORS ESS MAINTANANCE ACTION PLAN ๏ผ Maximise output of ESS ๏ผ Promote human well being ๏ผ Promote understanding of the socio- ecological system amongst stakeholders ๏ผ Strengthen the sense of community within and between children, residents and visitors ๏ผ Increased value and benefits from each dollar invested in maintance of the green areas
- 27. Strategies & Pre-Design Planning & Design Construction Maintenance CONCLUSIONS ๏ EVIDENCE-BASED PLANNING AND URBAN DESIGN ๏ COMMUNICATION TOOL FOR MULTIDISIPLINARY WORK, STAKEHOLDER COOPERATION AND COMMUNITY OUTREACH ๏ HUMAN SCALE AND WELL BEING IN FOCUS ๏ HOLISTIC BY DEFAULT ๏ BOOSTING THE LEGITIMACY OF THE SUSTAINABILITY MANAGEMENT
- 28. CONTACT LARS JOHANSSON SPECIALIST MANAGER +46 (0)10 615 12 24 LARS.JOHANSSON@RAMBOLL.SE SE.LINKEDIN.COM/IN/LARSCJOHANSSON
Editor's Notes
- PRACTICAL APPLICATIONS OF SOCIAL-ECOLOGICAL URBANISM (ECOSYSTEM SERVICES) WITHIN A LIVEABLE CITY FRAMEWORK LARS JOHANSSON1, LOTTIE CARLSSON2 AND INGRID BOKLUND3 * 1Project Management, Ramboll, Sweden * 2 Landscape & Planning, Ramboll, Sweden * 3Environment and health, Ramboll, Sweden There is a need for evidence-based, integrated and holistic models to support landscape planning and urban design in order to manage the complex social and ecological challenges currently facing our cities and the built environment. Social-Ecological Urbanism is a model for sustainable urban development and may provide, at least, part of the solution to rebuilding the links between urban living, ecology and individual health and well-being. According to Barthel et al (2013) in Principles of Social-Ecological Urbanism, such a methodology provides a strong ecological perspective and promotes an urban development framework that interacts closely with precious local ecosystems and green spaces. In this presentation, we describe case studies from the Swedish cities of Allingsรฅs, Uppsala, Norrtรคlje and Malmoe where the principles of social-ecological urbanism have been applied. Each study provides a slightly different perspective on the connections between ecosystem services and a liveability framework. Collectively, these case studies offer several experiences and lessons learned about how to introduce and integrate an ecosystem services perspective to urban master planning and landscape planning. We demonstrate how an ecosystems service perspective can help to map, identify and value the status quo of existing or proposed urban development projects, and to compare and visualize different plausible planning and design strategies that will optimize human well-being, health and quality of life. The case studies also demonstrate the need at a high level for evidence-based thinking and comparability because our understanding of ecosystem services continues to evolve in the international research community. The ecosystems service perspective is anthropocentric by default and, hence, has a strong connection to urban concepts of liveability. In this context, we define liveability as describing the cultural, social and ecological conditions necessary for a safe and healthy life for all inhabitants of cities, regions and communities. Liveability is based on the principle of sustainability and is sensitive to the natural environment and the protection of ecological resources. An important insight from the Swedish case studies described in this presentation is how successful incorporation of ecosystem services and urban liveability into planning programs is achievable and greatly enhanced by involvement of stakeholders representing cross- and multi- disciplinary perspectives. The ecosystem services perspective can increase the capacity of urban and landscape planners to identify complex ecological challenges in urban developments. Social-Ecological Urbanism, ecosystem services and liveability are three frameworks with strong connections to research and can bolster the legitimacy of planning efforts aimed at sustainability and effective management of our built environment. * Contact Information: Lars Johansson, Project Management, Ramboll, Uppsala office, Dragarbrunnsgatan 78 B, SE-75320, Uppsala, Sweden, Phone: +46-10-615 12 24, Email: lars.johansson@ramboll.se
- https://courses.sdgacademy.org/learn/planetary-boundaries-and-human-opportunities-september-2015
- Content slide
- Linking urban social-ecological system thinking with Jane Jacobs socio-spatial perspective and her understanding of the city as an ecosystem.
- Content slide, two columns with image. Image size: 8,46 cm x 10,76 cm or 320 x 407 pixels
- Endslide
- Industrial Harbour since the 19th Century New central city district - 5000 residents -
- A planning tool to ensure a certain amount of green and/or blue area during urban development/exploitation/densification. Tailoring and adjustment according to place-specific context by weighting ecological structures in calculations for design of buildings and public space.
- Endslide