SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 87
Risk Based Asset ManagementRisk-Based Asset Management
Identifying, Mitigating and Eliminating Risk with an AssetIdentifying, Mitigating and Eliminating Risk with an Asset
Management Strategy
Mike Poland, CMRP, Life Cycle Engineering
1© Life Cycle Engineering 2013© Life Cycle Engineering 2013
Introduction
Name tent introduction
Teambuilding/Grouping activity
Course learning objectivesCourse learning objectives
Participant expectations
2© Life Cycle Engineering 2013
Learning Objectives (1 of 2)
1. Describe the four phases in implementing a risk-
based asset management programbased asset management program
2. Demonstrate how to effectively classify assets
a. Create asset catalogs
b. Develop a functional hierarchy
3. Demonstrate methods for analyzing assets
a. Perform a criticality analysis
b. Create a functional block diagram
c. Perform a failure mode and effects analysis
3© Life Cycle Engineering 2013
Learning Objectives (2 of 2)
4. Map control strategies to predominant failure
modes
a. List elements of an effective job plan (PM)
b. Develop task modules for a maintenance
plan, including resource planningp , g p g
5. List key performance indicators to effectively
measure control strategiesg
6. Calculate overall equipment effectiveness
4© Life Cycle Engineering 2013
The Model:The Model:
Risk-Based Asset Management
SStrategy
5© Life Cycle Engineering 2013
Risk-Based Asset Management Model
•Learning to
OPERATIONAL STABILITY
Learning to
See MeasureMeasureControlControlAnalyzeAnalyzeClassifyClassify
Process Flow Diagram
Value Stream Mapping
Relationship Models
Equipment Criticality
Failure Analysis
Risk Analysis
Standard Work
Operating Procedures
Preventive
Predictive
Condition Monitoring
R t M it i
OEE
TCO
Asset Utilization
MTBFy
Risk Ranking
Remote Monitoring
Operator Care
Critical Spares
MTBF
MTTR
Continuous ImprovementContinuous Improvement
PlanPlan DoDo CheckCheck ActAct
6© Life Cycle Engineering 2013
Strategy documented in a planStrategy documented in a plan
Asset Management Plan Key
CComponents
7© Life Cycle Engineering 2013
Key Components
• Asset Operation Planp
• Asset Risk Plan
• Asset Maintenance Plan• Asset Maintenance Plan
8© Life Cycle Engineering 2013
Asset Management Plan
Asset
Operations Plan
Asset
Maintenance Plan
Asset
Risk Plan
Operating Parameters
Planned Utilization
Maintenance Parameters
Asset Hierarchy
Risk Parameters
Risk strategy, tolerance
Staffing Requirements
Raw/WIP Materials Requirements
Materials Handling Requirements
Energy/Utilities Requirements
Continuous Operating Hours
Production Schedule Variation
Criticality Ranking Index
Failure Modes and Effects
Maximum Continuous Operation
Mean-time-between-failure
Mean-time-between-maintenance
Mean-time-to-repair
Risk definition and categorization
Loss data collection
Risk indicator data collection
Control self-assessment
Risk assessment and analysis
Expected/Unexpected
Incoming Materials Specifications
Finished Products Specifications
Production Minimum Lot Size
Planned Capital Life
Performance Variables (KPIs)
Performance Tracking Process
p
Mean-time-to-rebuild
PM/PdM Requirements
Overhaul/Rebuild Requirements
Skills/Staffing Requirements
Anticipated Useful Life
Performance Variables (KPIs)
Expected/Unexpected
Loss Control Scores
Real exposures
Controls quality
Cost benefit analysis
Risk mitigation and transferPerformance Tracking Process
Business Risk Assessment
Performance Variables (KPIs)
Reliability Risk Assessment
Standard Work
strategy
9© Life Cycle Engineering 2013
Standard Work
The Asset Operation Plan
• Standard operating proceduresp g p
• Start-up / Shut–down procedures
• Materials procedures• Materials procedures
• Operator care procedures
10© Life Cycle Engineering 2013
The Asset Risk Plan
• Risk identification
• Risk analysis
• Risk mitigation
1. Identify
the Hazards
6.
Supervise
and Review
Risk mitigation
• Communication
plan
2. Assess
the Risks
5.
Implement
Risk
Controls
plan
• Risk management
table
3. Analyze
Risk Control
Measures
4. Make
Control
Decisions
table
11© Life Cycle Engineering 2013
The Benefits of Risk Management
MANAGEMENT
• Awareness of real
exposures
INFORMATION
• Expected Loss –
how much do I lose
on average?
• Unexpected Loss
DATA
exposures
• Knowledge of
controls quality
• Cost benefit analysis
• Improved risk
mitigation and
Eco
FOUNDATION
• Risk strategy,
tolerance
• Unexpected Loss –
how much I could
reasonably expect
to lose in a bad
year?
• Control Scores –
• Loss data collection
• Risk indicator data
collection
• Control self-
assessment
mitigation and
transfer strategy
onomicPro
• Roles and
responsibilities
• Policies and
procedures
• Risk definition and
categori ation
how good are the
controls I have in
place?
• Risk assessment and
analysis
• Automatic notification
• Follow-up action
reports
ofit
© American Society for Quality
categorization
12© Life Cycle Engineering 2013
Management & Control Quality
The Asset Maintenance Plan
The Infrastructure:
• Database development• Database development
• Asset definitions
• Required attributes
• Functional/Reliability block diagramsy g
• Hierarchy development
• Criticality analysis• Criticality analysis
• Failure mode and effects analysis
13© Life Cycle Engineering 2013
The Asset Maintenance Plan
Task module creation
• Mapping failure modes to failure detection• Mapping failure modes to failure detection
methods
R b ild/R f bi h t it i• Rebuild/Refurbishment criteria
• Assigning crafts and trades
• Determining frequency
• Establishing durationsEstablishing durations
• Level loading tasks
14© Life Cycle Engineering 2013
The Asset Maintenance Plan
Developing preventive maintenance tasksp g p
• Failure-based
• Comprehensive procedureComprehensive procedure
• Organized structure
• Repeatable results
• Acceptance criteria
15© Life Cycle Engineering 2013
The Asset Maintenance Plan
Predictive technologies – the big 5g g
1. Thermography
2 Oil analysis2. Oil analysis
3. Ultrasonic analysis
4. Vibration analysis
5. Motor Current analysis
16© Life Cycle Engineering 2013
The Asset Maintenance Plan
MRO supportpp
• Developing bill of materials
• Determining critical spare part thresholdsDetermining critical spare part thresholds
C ti i tContinuous improvement
• Value metrics
• Feedback process
17© Life Cycle Engineering 2013
•Learning to
See MeasureControlAnalyzeClassify
Process Flow Diagram
Value Stream Mapping
Relationship Models
Equipment Criticality
Failure Analysis
Risk Analysis
Risk Ranking
Standard Work
Operating Procedures
Preventive
Predictive
Condition Monitoring
Remote Monitoring
Operator Care
OEE
TCO
Asset Utilization
MTBF
MTTROperator Care
Critical Spares
Continuous Improvement
Plan Do Check Act
Classify Phasey
Value Stream Maps
18© Life Cycle Engineering 2013
Classify Phase
• Process flow diagramsg
• Value stream maps
• Asset catalogsAsset catalogs
19© Life Cycle Engineering 2013
Value Stream Mapping
• A pictorial representation of the flow of
material and information as the product is
being built
• Follow a product’s production path from
beginning to end, and draw a visual
t ti f i threpresentation of every process in the
material and information flows
D “f ” f h l• Draw a “future state” map of how value
should flow
20© Life Cycle Engineering 2013
VSM Icons
21© Life Cycle Engineering 2013
VSM Icons
22© Life Cycle Engineering 2013
Current State Mapping
• Understand how the shop floor currently
operates
• Material and information flows
• Start with the “door to door” flow
• Draw using iconsDraw using icons
• Walk the flow and get actual numbers
N t d d ti• No standard times
• Draw by hand with pencil
23© Life Cycle Engineering 2013
Current State Map
Supplier Customer
Quarterly Forecast
Daily Ordering
Monthly Forecast
Weekly Deliveries
Planning & Control
25 / Day
Weekly
Shipments Weekly
S h d l
Daily Ship
S h d lSchedule ScheduleDaily
Check
68Parts
C/T = 12 min
C/O = 0 min
U/T = 85%
OP60
(Ship)
OP50OP40OP30OP20OP10
10Parts
5Parts 4Parts 12Parts 8Parts
C/T = 21 min
C/O = 0 min
U/T = 85%
C/T = 21 min
C/O = 0 min
U/T = 85%
C/T = 21
min
C/O = 0 min
C/T = 24 min
C/O = 0 min
I
IIIII
U/T 85%
12 min
0.32days0.4 days
21 min
0.2 days
21 min
0.16 days 0.48 days
21 min 24 min 99 min
4.28 days
U/T = 85% U/T = 85% C/O = 0 min
U/T = 85%
C/O 0
U/T = 85%
Takt Time = 450min /25 pieces = 18
2.72 days
24© Life Cycle Engineering 2013
a t e 50 / 5 p eces 8
min
•Learning to
See MeasureControlAnalyzeClassify
Process Flow Diagram
Value Stream Mapping
Relationship Models
Equipment Criticality
Failure Analysis
Risk Analysis
Risk Ranking
Standard Work
Operating Procedures
Preventive
Predictive
Condition Monitoring
Remote Monitoring
Operator Care
OEE
TCO
Asset Utilization
MTBF
MTTROperator Care
Critical Spares
Continuous Improvement
Plan Do Check Act
Classify Phase:y
Hierarchy Development
25© Life Cycle Engineering 2013
Hierarchy Development
Hierarchy is the systematic classification ofy y
items into generic groups based on factors
possibly common to several of the items
( )(location, use, equipment subdivision, etc.) in
a parent – child relationship.
26© Life Cycle Engineering 2013
Functional Hierarchy
(1)
Business
Category
(2)
tionData
Discuss this model and the
Functional Hierarchy
Guidelines in your(2)
Installation/
Business Unit
(3)
Cost Center/ Op Unit
Use/Locat
Guidelines in your
workbook (pg. 7)
(4)
Function
(5)
System
n
System
(6)
Sub system/asset
ntSubdivisio
(7)
Component/Maintainable Item
(8)
Part/ BOM
Equipmen
27© Life Cycle Engineering 2013
Part/ BOM
Functional Hierarchy Activity
1. Join into groups
2. Determine a system where an air compressor
would be in operation
3. Refer to the compressor user guide
4. Create a functional hierarchy, mapped to they, pp
motor as the lowest maintainable asset
a. You can use the pyramid model, levels 1-9y
to organize your hierarchy
28© Life Cycle Engineering 2013
Client - 1 Company
ABC
Hierarchy
Facility - 2
ABC
Plant ABC
y
Answer
Key
Building - 3
Function - 4
Building 312
Distribution
y
System - 5
Distribution
Pneumatic Drive
S t
Sub-system - 6
System
Air
Compressor
Component - 7
Part /BOM - 8
Motor
Gasket
29© Life Cycle Engineering 2013
Asset Definition
• Once the hierarchy is established, the level 7y ,
components are standardized into asset types
and minimum attributes are assigned to
support:
– BOM development
– PM/PdM development
– Failure analysis
30© Life Cycle Engineering 2013
Asset Data
Detailed information such as:
• Asset criticality
• Nameplate dataNameplate data
• Engineering specification
• Property detailProperty detail
• Other searchable characteristics
31© Life Cycle Engineering 2013
Data Collection Guidelines
• Workbook has Data
Collection
Guidelines for
reference (pg 9)reference (pg. 9)
• Discuss
– Data collection
process
– Field data gathering
32© Life Cycle Engineering 2013
•Learning to
See MeasureControlAnalyzeClassify
Process Flow Diagram
Value Stream Mapping
Relationship Models
Equipment Criticality
Failure Analysis
Risk Analysis
Risk Ranking
Standard Work
Operating Procedures
Preventive
Predictive
Condition Monitoring
Remote Monitoring
Operator Care
OEE
TCO
Asset Utilization
MTBF
MTTROperator Care
Critical Spares
Continuous Improvement
Plan Do Check Act
Analyze Phase:y
Criticality Analysis
33© Life Cycle Engineering 2013
Criticality Analysis
• Criticality is defined as a state of importance.y p
• As a measure, it represents the severity of a
failure in relation to its consequences.q
• Equipment criticality is a ranking reflecting the
magnitude of the consequences resulting frommagnitude of the consequences resulting from
an equipment failure.
34© Life Cycle Engineering 2013
Contributors to Criticality
Consequences usually considered are theq y
impact on:
• Environment
• Health
• Safetyy
• Production or value stream
• ReputationReputation
35© Life Cycle Engineering 2013
Criticality Thought Process
Determining function of equipment, system, item
process, etc.
Is it main equipment or an auxiliary item?
Is it a unique Item or common with others?
Redundancy – Duplication – Alternative
Do you have a standby backup?
Do you have alternative means to continue normal operation?
What is the likelihood of a failure mode occurring?
(High/low)
Consider history of failures for equipment
Consider possibility and frequency of failures
What are the consequences of failure?
Any production losses as a result of failure? How much?
Any safety, environmental, or business losses as a result of
failure?
What is the likely period out of operation?
Can the repair be done on site?
Are spare parts available? How long to get parts if not in
stock?
What is the longest time for repairing the failure?
36© Life Cycle Engineering 2013
What is the longest time for repairing the failure?
•Learning to
See MeasureControlAnalyzeClassify
Process Flow Diagram
Value Stream Mapping
Relationship Models
Equipment Criticality
Failure Analysis
Risk Analysis
Risk Ranking
Standard Work
Operating Procedures
Preventive
Predictive
Condition Monitoring
Remote Monitoring
Operator Care
OEE
TCO
Asset Utilization
MTBF
MTTROperator Care
Critical Spares
Continuous Improvement
Plan Do Check Act
Analyze Phase:
Failure Mode and Effects Analysis
(FMEA)
37© Life Cycle Engineering 2013
Block Diagrams
• The precursor to developing a functionalp p g
hierarchy and a maintenance strategy is the
functional and reliability block diagrams.
38© Life Cycle Engineering 2013
Block Diagrams
• Functional and reliability block diagramsy g
illustrate the operation, interrelationships, and
interdependencies of functional entities.
• More than one block diagram will usually be
required to display alternative modes of
operation, depending upon the definition
established for the system.
39© Life Cycle Engineering 2013
Functional Block Diagram: Purpose
• The primary purpose of the functional blockp y p p
diagram (FDB) is to ensure that the RE
determines all of the functions provided by and
/within the asset and/or system so that
functional failures can be determined and
analyzedanalyzed.
40© Life Cycle Engineering 2013
FBD: Description
• Shows major system components, their functional
relationships to one another, and the incoming and
t i i t foutgoing interfaces.
• Includes:
– Interfaces to distributive systemsInterfaces to distributive systems
– Interfaces between subsystems
– Power, data, and structural interfaces
Out interfaces represent active functions– Out interfaces represent active functions
– Passive functions, such as containment of fluids, may be
internal to the functional block diagram
Note: For purposes of failure analysis, the RE assumes that
all incoming functions are available
41© Life Cycle Engineering 2013
FBD Example
Temperature& Pressure Readout
Instrumentation& Monitors
20
Automatic Shutdown
Signals
(Temperature & High Pressure)
Signal to Control Valve
Electrical
Control
Motor
10
Electric Power Pump
50
High
Pressure
Torque
Pressure Control
Valve
Bearing
Lubrication
System
30
50
Oil Mist
Water60
Fresh Water
Sump
Fresh Water Suction
40
Clean Fresh Water
Strainer
42© Life Cycle Engineering 2013
Functional Block Diagram Activity
1. Join with a partner or group
2. Distribute the air compressor user manual (handout)
3 Review the user manual3. Review the user manual
4. Draft an FBD for the air compressor
a Sho major s stem componentsa. Show major system components
b. Show relationships between systems
c. Show ingoing and outgoing interfaces
43© Life Cycle Engineering 2013
Answer – FBD Activity
PRESSURE
READOUT
INSTRUMENTATION
&
AUTOMATIC
STARTUP
MONITORSSHUT DOWN
ELECTRIC
CONTROL
MOTOR COMPRESSOR PRV
120
VAC
TORQUE PRESSURIZED
AIR
CUT IN
95 PSI
PRESSURE
RELIEF @
125 PSI
TANK
2 GALLON CAPACITY
44© Life Cycle Engineering 2013
FMEA
• Developed by US military and standardized byp y y y
automotive industry
• Top-down method
• Based on industrial and in-plant historical data
• Generally limited to major sub-systemsy j y
Can include components, but failure modes,
probability of failure, etc. based on experience, not
b bilit t blprobability tables
45© Life Cycle Engineering 2013
Example Of FMEA Analysis
Pass out completed example FMEA for class to see
46© Life Cycle Engineering 2013
OR show onscreen example (RBAM FMEA completed example)
Terms
• Occurrence ranking:g
– A subjective estimate of the probability that
a failure mode will occur.
– What different variables or factors are
involved in determining occurrence?
47© Life Cycle Engineering 2013
Terms
• Detection ranking:g
– A subjective estimate of the probability that
a cause of a potential failure will be
detected and corrected before reaching the
end user.
– A subjective estimate of the probability that
a cause of a potential failure will be
d t t d d t d b f f ildetected and corrected before a failure can
occur.
48© Life Cycle Engineering 2013
Terms
• Risk Priority Number (RPN):y ( )
– The product of severity, occurrence, and
detection rankings
– Severity x Occurrence x Detection = RPN
– Sometimes divided by 30 to give you a 100– Sometimes divided by 30 to give you a 100
scale
49© Life Cycle Engineering 2013
Uses of FMEA
1. Root-cause failure analysis
a Methodology for understanding potential forcing functionsa. Methodology for understanding potential forcing functions
that caused problem
2. Drives preventive maintenance programp p g
a. Identified forcing functions and failure modes determine the
specific PM inspections that should be done to preserve the
asset and prevent failures
3. Drives asset management program
a. Determines the fundamental requirements, e.g. operations
and maintenance, for the asset
4. Drives asset utilization plans
50© Life Cycle Engineering 2013
Uses of FMEA
5. Drives modifications and upgrades
a. Many of the identified forcing functions
and failure modes can be eliminated by
specific modifications or changes inspecific modifications or changes in
design
6 Drives standard work practices (SWP)6. Drives standard work practices (SWP)
upgrades
a Forcing functions or failures caused bya. Forcing functions or failures caused by
setup or operating methods can be
eliminated
51© Life Cycle Engineering 2013
Reliability Engineering FMEA
• Engineer must understand the machine org
production system
– Machine or operating dynamics
– Inherent design strengths and limitations
– Failure modes of components, sub-assemblies andp ,
systems
• Requires homework and self-study to gain thisq y g
knowledge
52© Life Cycle Engineering 2013
Reliability Engineering FMEA
• Must be driven or supported by data
– Focus Team FMEA relies exclusively on “native
knowledge”
– Engineering FMEA also uses, but all three criteria
must be verified using existing historical data
• Level of detail must be as good as can be
accomplished
– Focus Team uses 80-20 rule
– Engineering must strive for at least 90-10
53© Life Cycle Engineering 2013
FMEA Activity: Air Compressor
1. On the FMEA form (handout) list two
t ti l f ti l f ilpotential functional failures
2. List five possible failure modes for any of the
functional failures of the compressorfunctional failures of the compressor
a. See functional block diagram and list of
failure mode descriptors in workbookfailure mode descriptors in workbook
3. Input failure effects into the form
f f4. Input failure causes into the form
5. Enter data given in instructions to calculate
RPN
54© Life Cycle Engineering 2013
RPN
•Learning to
See MeasureControlAnalyzeClassify
Process Flow Diagram
Value Stream Mapping
Relationship Models
Equipment Criticality
Failure Analysis
Risk Analysis
Risk Ranking
Standard Work
Operating Procedures
Preventive
Predictive
Condition Monitoring
Remote Monitoring
Operator Care
OEE
TCO
Asset Utilization
MTBF
MTTROperator Care
Critical Spares
Continuous Improvement
Plan Do Check Act
Control Phase:
Effective Job Plans
55© Life Cycle Engineering 2013
The PM Process
PlPlan
DoAct
CheckCheck
56© Life Cycle Engineering 2013
The PM Program
High
Op
Total Maintenance Cost
BLost Production
peratingBudget
Proactive
Maintenance
B
MaintenanceCost
Lost Production
Caused by Failures
Lack of PM Access
M
ts
Cost of PMCost of Repairs
Maintenance
Budget
Level of MaintenanceLow High
Low
57© Life Cycle Engineering 2013
Three Phases of PM
DetectionDetection
• The key element
Analysis
• Defines the specific problem from
hi h th t i i twhich the symptom originates
Correction
• The return of the PM/PdM
investment
58© Life Cycle Engineering 2013
Understand Degradation Process
Avoid consequence of failure
Functional failure-
System not meeting
All requirements
Onset of failure
Detect potential failure-
system meeting all
requirements
Cond
qequ e e ts
dition
Maintenance
Window
Pending Failure
not detected
Broken
Time
Window
“PF interval" Performance
Losses
59© Life Cycle Engineering 2013
Source: Ivara Corp, Hamilton, Ontario
Time
P-F Interval Curve and Domains
Changes in Vibration P-
F interval 1-9 months
Thermography Thermal
Anomalies interval 1-3 months
Acoustic
Emissions
Ultrasound
Wear Debris in oil
interval 1-6 months
Audible noise P-
F interval 1-4
Ultrasound
interval 1-10
months
P2P1
weeks
Heat by touch P-
F interval 1-5
days
P3
P2
days
Predictive
Domain
Protective
Domain
Failure
(bearing seizes)
PLUS F
Elimination
Program
Identification
program
60© Life Cycle Engineering 2013
Collateral Damage
Source: Allied Services Group
PM Inspection Results
• Inspection feedback is essential
• Feedback should identify potential
equipment conditions needing correctiveequipment conditions needing corrective
action
Th b f ti k d• The number of corrective work orders
helps to refine the PM program
• Rule of thumb: Every six inspections
should result in one corrective work order
61© Life Cycle Engineering 2013
•Learning to
See MeasureControlAnalyzeClassify
Process Flow Diagram
Value Stream Mapping
Relationship Models
Equipment Criticality
Failure Analysis
Risk Analysis
Risk Ranking
Standard Work
Operating Procedures
Preventive
Predictive
Condition Monitoring
Remote Monitoring
Operator Care
OEE
TCO
Asset Utilization
MTBF
MTTROperator Care
Critical Spares
Continuous Improvement
Plan Do Check Act
Control Phase:
Maintenance Plan Task Modules
62© Life Cycle Engineering 2013
Task Creation Guidelines
• Step-through Task Creation Guidelines sheet in
workbook (pg. 19)
• Review the Example Task Module on next slide
(pg. 24)
63© Life Cycle Engineering 2013
Example Task Module
EQUIPMENT NUMBER DESCRIPTION LOCATION DOCUMENTATION VALIDATED
ITEM#
FREQUENCY
(Days)
CRAFT
CRAFTSMEN
REQD
EQUIPMENT
CONDITION
TYPE
EST.TIME(Hrs)
ANNUAL(Hrs)
01 1 ENG/RM 1 RUNNING PM 0DAILY SERVICING ROUTINES
305-2-1 Disc Brake System Drill Floor Maintenance Manual
SPECIAL TOOLS/MATERIALS
REMARKS
305-2-1 Drawworks, Dreco SSGD-750-GE Drill Floor General Service Manual
MAINTENANCE TASK DESCRIPTION
PROCEDURE/
TASK#
01 1 ENG/RM 1 RUNNING PM 0
02 7 ENG/RM 1 SHUTDOWN PM 0
03 30 ENG/RM 1 SHUTDOWN PM 0
04 90 CE 1 SHUTDOWN PM 0
05 180 ENG/RM 1 SHUTDOWN PM 0
CHECK DISC BRAKE FRICTION PADS, CHECK LUBE OIL PUMPS, CHECK
HYDRAULIC OIL PUMPS AND ACCUMULATOR BOTTLES, LUBRICATE TORQUE
ARM AND INSPECT WIRE ROPE
INSPECT LUBE OIL DISTRIBUTION LINES, CHECK GEAR OIL SPRAY NOZZLES,
CHECK OPERATION OF HYDRAULIC PUMPS, INSPECT DRAWWORKS DRIVE
GEARS, INSPECT THE TORQUE ARMS, OBTAIN LUBE OIL AND HYDRAULIC OIL
INSPECT INTEGRITY OF ELECTRICAL COMPONENTS
DAILY SERVICING ROUTINES
WEEKLY SERVICING ROUTINES
06 360 ENG/RM 1 SHUTDOWN PM 0
VERIFY OPERATION OF ISOLATION BARRIERS, CHECK PRESSURE
SAMPLE, REMOVE AND REPLACE LUBE OIL FILTER ELEMENT, REMOVE AND
REPLACE HYDRAULIC OIL FILTER ELEMENT
INSPECT GEARS, CHECK HIGH SPEED GEAR WOBBLE, CHECK PINION GEAR
BACKLASH, CHECK PINION GEAR TOOTH CONTACT, INSPECT, DISASSEMBLE
AND CLEAN LUBE OIL COOLING PLATE HEAT EXCHANGER, INSPECT PIPING,
HOSES, CONNECTIONS AND FOUNDATION FASTENERS, DRAIN AND FLUSH
HYDRAULIC POWER UNIT, CHECK BRAKE CALIPER DELAY SYSTEM, CHECK
BRAKE DISK CONDITION AND NDE INSPECTION OF FOUNDATION BOLTS
07 360 CE 1 SHUTDOWN PM 0
08 1800 ENG/RM 2 SHUTDOWN PM 0
09 1800 ENG/RM 5 SHUTDOWN PM 0
PERFORM COMPLETE OVERHAUL AND NDE OF DRAWWORKS ASSEMBLY,
REMOVE AND REPLACE HPU AND HYDRAULIC SYSTEM HOSES, REPLACE
DRAWWORKS BRAKE CALIPER SPRING PACKS, NDE CALIPER PISTONS, NDE
CALIPER MOUNT AND GUIDE BARS CHECK BRAKE CALIPERS ALIGNMENT
PERFORM CONDITION EVALUATION OF DRAWWORKS PRIOR TO SPS - TO
DETERMINE OVERHAUL REQUIREMENTS
TRANSMITTERS, TEMPERATURE SWITCHES, LEVEL SWITCHES, DIFFERENTIAL
PRESSURE SWITCH, VALVE ON/OFF SOLENOID, HAND OPERATED SWITCH,
ENCODER AND DEADLINE ANCHOR PRESSURE TRANSMITTER
09 1800 ENG/RM 5 SHUTDOWN PM 0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
CALIPER MOUNT AND GUIDE BARS, CHECK BRAKE CALIPERS ALIGNMENT,
INSPECT DRAWWORKS LUBRICATION SYSTEM, CHECK LUBE OIL PRESSURE
RELIEF AND FLOW CONTROL VALVES, AND NDE FOUNDATION BOLTS AND
SKID WELDS
ANNUAL SCHEDULED MAINTENANCE HRS
ANNUAL SHUTDOWN HRS
ANNUAL SENIOR TOOLPUSHER/DRILLING HRS
ANNUAL CHIEF ENGINEER/MECHANIC HRS
64© Life Cycle Engineering 2013
0.0
0.0
ANNUAL CHIEF ELECTRICIAN HRS
ANNUAL 3RD PARTY HRS
Task Module Activity
• Join in groupsg p
• Draft at least four maintenance tasks into the
blank Task Module Worksheet (workbook,
pg.25)
• Resources:
– Task Module Guidelines (workbook)
– Compressor user guide
– Example task module
65© Life Cycle Engineering 2013
•Learning to
See MeasureControlAnalyzeClassify
Process Flow Diagram
Value Stream Mapping
Relationship Models
Equipment Criticality
Failure Analysis
Risk Analysis
Risk Ranking
Standard Work
Operating Procedures
Preventive
Predictive
Condition Monitoring
Remote Monitoring
Operator Care
OEE
TCO
Asset Utilization
MTBF
MTTROperator Care
Critical Spares
Continuous Improvement
Plan Do Check Act
Measure Phase:
Key Performance Indicators
66© Life Cycle Engineering 2013
Which Measures to Use?
• Review the KPI
definitions in o r
KPIs for your RBAM
definitions in your
workbook as we
detail each KPI (pg.
program:
• OEE
28)
– Formula
– Purpose
• Maintenance cost
per RAV
Purpose
– Data source
– Links to business
RASI
• PM compliance
– RASI
– Frequency
67© Life Cycle Engineering 2013
Maintenance Cost per RAV
Total Maintenance Cost
Replacement Asset Value (RAV)
• Total Maintenance Cost: all labor, material,
and contract services required to maintain
facility assets
• Replacement Asset Value: value of replacing
i ti t t t t ti texisting assets at current construction costs,
using like technologies
68© Life Cycle Engineering 2013
Review other KPI elements
Maintenance Cost per RAV:p
– Data source
– Links to businessLinks to business
– RASI
– FrequencyFrequency
69© Life Cycle Engineering 2013
PM Compliance
# of Scheduled PM Work Orders Completed
# of Scheduled PM Work Orders
The acceptance criteria should be within 10% of
the scheduled frequency of the PM.
For example, for a monthly (30 day) PM work
order to be considered an “on-time
l ti ” it ld b li h d ithicompletion,” it would be accomplished within
3 days (plus or minus) of the scheduled date.
70© Life Cycle Engineering 2013
Review Other KPI Elements
Predictive Maintenance Compliance:p
– Data source
– Links to businessLinks to business
– RASI
– FrequencyFrequency
71© Life Cycle Engineering 2013
•Learning to
See MeasureControlAnalyzeClassify
Process Flow Diagram
Value Stream Mapping
Relationship Models
Equipment Criticality
Failure Analysis
Risk Analysis
Risk Ranking
Standard Work
Operating Procedures
Preventive
Predictive
Condition Monitoring
Remote Monitoring
Operator Care
OEE
TCO
Asset Utilization
MTBF
MTTROperator Care
Critical Spares
Continuous Improvement
Plan Do Check Act
Measure Phase:
Calculate OEE
72© Life Cycle Engineering 2013
Measuring Losses from Ideal (Lean)
PerformancePerformance
Theory Of Constraints
10% 10%
100%
15%
20%
15%
10%
15%
10% 10%
20%
25%
80%
90%
Time Loss
10%
20%
15%
10%
20%
5%
5%
10%
10%
10%
60%
70%
Time Loss
Rate Loss
Yield Loss
No Demand
Asset Utilization
10%
5%0%
40%
50%
30%
Step #1 Step #2 Step #3 Step #4 Step #5
Manufacturing Process Steps
CustomerRAW
73© Life Cycle Engineering 2013
Manufacturing Process Steps
Uptime (OEE)
Operating Time
Scheduled Time
Uptime (%) =
Note: Uptime only excludes “lack of sales/demand”
Scheduled Time
p y
74© Life Cycle Engineering 2013
Rate
Average Rate
R t (%)
Best Demonstrated or Design
Rate
Rate (%) =
Note: The Best Demonstrated Rate or Design Rate,
use the greater of the two. Best Demonstrated
corresponds to three highest consecutive days (1% of
annual time). If data is only available by week, then
use best one week (2%).
75© Life Cycle Engineering 2013
Quality
First Pass Units
*Q lit (%)
First Pass Units
Total Units
*Quality (%) =
Note: The FPQ corresponds to the volume
(Units) of product within specification when the(Units) of product within specification when the
material leaves the production line or machine,
compared to the total volume (Units) quantitycompared to the total volume (Units) quantity
processed by the production line or machine.
* Place holder term sometimes referred to as yield
76© Life Cycle Engineering 2013
Place holder term sometimes referred to as yield
Daily Logging OEE
Review the OEE Daily Log sheet in your workbook forReview the OEE Daily Log sheet in your workbook for
an example of how to calculate OEE on a daily
basis (pg. 31).
77© Life Cycle Engineering 2013
OEE Calculator Activity
• Calculate the business case potential for OEEp
using the OEE Calculator activity in your
workbook (pg. 32).
• What do the results tell you about how to use
OEE to manage your program?
78© Life Cycle Engineering 2013
OEE Scenario Activity
1. Read the OEE
scenario in yourscenario in your
workbook (pg.
33).
2. Determine the
OEE for the
d ti liproduction line.
3. Graph the asset
tili ation lossesutilization losses
per the
scenario.
79© Life Cycle Engineering 2013
scenario.
Making OEE a Leading, Visual Indicator
ng
r
and
ator
led
me
uled
me
over
of
al
ct
Operati
Hour
NoDema
NoOpera
Schedu
Downtim
Unsched
Downtim
Change-o
Lacko
Materia
Defec
U
C
1 X X X
2 X X
3 X
4 X
5 X X
6 X
7 X X
8 X
80© Life Cycle Engineering 2013
8 X
Total Cost of Ownershipp
81© Life Cycle Engineering 2013
TTotalCCostoffOwnnershipp
82© Life Cycle Engineering 2013
The Four Phase RBAM Model:
R i d A ti PlReview and Action Plan
83© Life Cycle Engineering 2013
RBAM Four Phase Review
OPERATIONAL STABILITY
•Learning to
See MeasureControlAnalyzeClassify
Process Flow Diagram
Value Stream Mapping
Relationship Models
Equipment Criticality
Failure Analysis
Standard Work
Operating Procedures
Preventive
Predictive
C diti M it i
OEE
TCO
Asset UtilizationRelationship Models
y
Risk Analysis
Risk Ranking
Condition Monitoring
Remote Monitoring
Operator Care
Critical Spares
Asset Utilization
MTBF
MTTR
Continuous Improvement
Plan Do Check Act
84© Life Cycle Engineering 2013
RBAM Action Plan
• Use the four-phase template in your workbook to
develop an action plan (pg.34). Include:
– Activities to target in all four phases: classify,
analyze control measureanalyze, control, measure
– Specific actions you will take in the next 30
days to support RBAMdays to support RBAM
– Support you will need to build the RBAM
program at your site
• Debrief your plan to the class
85© Life Cycle Engineering 2013
Congratulations!
Celebrate learningg
86© Life Cycle Engineering 2013
Thank You!
Interested in learning more?
Mike Poland CMRPMike Poland, CMRP
Dir., Asset Management Services
MPoland@LCE.com@
www.LCE.com
Visit Life Cycle Engineering at Booth #908
87© Life Cycle Engineering 2013

More Related Content

What's hot

Webinar | OEE-implementaties zonder zorgen
Webinar | OEE-implementaties zonder zorgenWebinar | OEE-implementaties zonder zorgen
Webinar | OEE-implementaties zonder zorgenStork
 
IBM Maximo Predictive Maintenance FMMUG 2018
IBM Maximo Predictive Maintenance FMMUG 2018IBM Maximo Predictive Maintenance FMMUG 2018
IBM Maximo Predictive Maintenance FMMUG 2018FMMUG
 
Maintenance cost to Savings
Maintenance cost to SavingsMaintenance cost to Savings
Maintenance cost to SavingsSwapnil Sharma
 
Scott Pacich - 2016 Resume
Scott Pacich - 2016 ResumeScott Pacich - 2016 Resume
Scott Pacich - 2016 ResumeScott Pacich
 
Reasons to have a contract labour management system
Reasons to have a contract labour management systemReasons to have a contract labour management system
Reasons to have a contract labour management systemEmsphere Technologies
 
Amjad CV 08-21-2016 NS
Amjad CV 08-21-2016 NSAmjad CV 08-21-2016 NS
Amjad CV 08-21-2016 NSAmjad Muhtaseb
 
Accelerate Time to Value with PTC’s BOM Management Value Ready Deployments
Accelerate Time to Value with PTC’s BOM Management Value Ready DeploymentsAccelerate Time to Value with PTC’s BOM Management Value Ready Deployments
Accelerate Time to Value with PTC’s BOM Management Value Ready DeploymentsPTC
 
Leveraging Performance Standards to Reduce Risk - Houston SMRP MaRS 2013
Leveraging Performance Standards to Reduce Risk - Houston SMRP MaRS 2013Leveraging Performance Standards to Reduce Risk - Houston SMRP MaRS 2013
Leveraging Performance Standards to Reduce Risk - Houston SMRP MaRS 2013Mike Poland, CMRP
 
Asset Performance Management in Oil and Gas Industry
Asset Performance Management in Oil and Gas Industry Asset Performance Management in Oil and Gas Industry
Asset Performance Management in Oil and Gas Industry Arrelic
 
Strategies for Asset Performance Management @ ARC's 2011 Industry Forum
Strategies for Asset Performance Management @ ARC's 2011 Industry Forum Strategies for Asset Performance Management @ ARC's 2011 Industry Forum
Strategies for Asset Performance Management @ ARC's 2011 Industry Forum ARC Advisory Group
 
Internal Audit - A Comprehensive Risk Management tool
Internal Audit  - A Comprehensive Risk Management toolInternal Audit  - A Comprehensive Risk Management tool
Internal Audit - A Comprehensive Risk Management toolRamesh Verma
 
Stream D_John Ahmet Erkoyuncu
Stream D_John Ahmet ErkoyuncuStream D_John Ahmet Erkoyuncu
Stream D_John Ahmet ErkoyuncuBecarAsset
 
An introduction to an effective earned value management system (EVMS) webinar...
An introduction to an effective earned value management system (EVMS) webinar...An introduction to an effective earned value management system (EVMS) webinar...
An introduction to an effective earned value management system (EVMS) webinar...Association for Project Management
 
Stream D_Richard Longman, Chris Pickford, Mike Niblett
Stream D_Richard Longman, Chris Pickford, Mike NiblettStream D_Richard Longman, Chris Pickford, Mike Niblett
Stream D_Richard Longman, Chris Pickford, Mike NiblettBecarAsset
 

What's hot (20)

I Field Overview Spe Reservoir Study Group 0108
I Field Overview Spe Reservoir Study Group 0108I Field Overview Spe Reservoir Study Group 0108
I Field Overview Spe Reservoir Study Group 0108
 
Maximo kpi
Maximo kpiMaximo kpi
Maximo kpi
 
Webinar | OEE-implementaties zonder zorgen
Webinar | OEE-implementaties zonder zorgenWebinar | OEE-implementaties zonder zorgen
Webinar | OEE-implementaties zonder zorgen
 
RBI Embedded within Maximo
RBI Embedded within MaximoRBI Embedded within Maximo
RBI Embedded within Maximo
 
IBM Maximo Predictive Maintenance FMMUG 2018
IBM Maximo Predictive Maintenance FMMUG 2018IBM Maximo Predictive Maintenance FMMUG 2018
IBM Maximo Predictive Maintenance FMMUG 2018
 
Maintenance cost to Savings
Maintenance cost to SavingsMaintenance cost to Savings
Maintenance cost to Savings
 
Scott Pacich - 2016 Resume
Scott Pacich - 2016 ResumeScott Pacich - 2016 Resume
Scott Pacich - 2016 Resume
 
Reasons to have a contract labour management system
Reasons to have a contract labour management systemReasons to have a contract labour management system
Reasons to have a contract labour management system
 
Amjad CV 08-21-2016 NS
Amjad CV 08-21-2016 NSAmjad CV 08-21-2016 NS
Amjad CV 08-21-2016 NS
 
BPM Presentation WTcomments
BPM Presentation WTcommentsBPM Presentation WTcomments
BPM Presentation WTcomments
 
Accelerate Time to Value with PTC’s BOM Management Value Ready Deployments
Accelerate Time to Value with PTC’s BOM Management Value Ready DeploymentsAccelerate Time to Value with PTC’s BOM Management Value Ready Deployments
Accelerate Time to Value with PTC’s BOM Management Value Ready Deployments
 
Leveraging Performance Standards to Reduce Risk - Houston SMRP MaRS 2013
Leveraging Performance Standards to Reduce Risk - Houston SMRP MaRS 2013Leveraging Performance Standards to Reduce Risk - Houston SMRP MaRS 2013
Leveraging Performance Standards to Reduce Risk - Houston SMRP MaRS 2013
 
Asset Performance Management in Oil and Gas Industry
Asset Performance Management in Oil and Gas Industry Asset Performance Management in Oil and Gas Industry
Asset Performance Management in Oil and Gas Industry
 
Strategies for Asset Performance Management @ ARC's 2011 Industry Forum
Strategies for Asset Performance Management @ ARC's 2011 Industry Forum Strategies for Asset Performance Management @ ARC's 2011 Industry Forum
Strategies for Asset Performance Management @ ARC's 2011 Industry Forum
 
CSIP_BA_V2
CSIP_BA_V2CSIP_BA_V2
CSIP_BA_V2
 
Internal Audit - A Comprehensive Risk Management tool
Internal Audit  - A Comprehensive Risk Management toolInternal Audit  - A Comprehensive Risk Management tool
Internal Audit - A Comprehensive Risk Management tool
 
Mis 4
Mis 4Mis 4
Mis 4
 
Stream D_John Ahmet Erkoyuncu
Stream D_John Ahmet ErkoyuncuStream D_John Ahmet Erkoyuncu
Stream D_John Ahmet Erkoyuncu
 
An introduction to an effective earned value management system (EVMS) webinar...
An introduction to an effective earned value management system (EVMS) webinar...An introduction to an effective earned value management system (EVMS) webinar...
An introduction to an effective earned value management system (EVMS) webinar...
 
Stream D_Richard Longman, Chris Pickford, Mike Niblett
Stream D_Richard Longman, Chris Pickford, Mike NiblettStream D_Richard Longman, Chris Pickford, Mike Niblett
Stream D_Richard Longman, Chris Pickford, Mike Niblett
 

Similar to Identifying, Mitigating and Eliminating Risk with an Asset Management Strategy

Merck's West Point Facility Embraces RCM
Merck's West Point Facility Embraces RCMMerck's West Point Facility Embraces RCM
Merck's West Point Facility Embraces RCMMike Poland, CMRP
 
Modern Maintenance & Reliability Management: Planning and Estimating Workshop...
Modern Maintenance & Reliability Management: Planning and Estimating Workshop...Modern Maintenance & Reliability Management: Planning and Estimating Workshop...
Modern Maintenance & Reliability Management: Planning and Estimating Workshop...Sagar Sangam Sahu
 
Nick Tompkins QGC Presentation Nov2015
Nick Tompkins QGC Presentation Nov2015Nick Tompkins QGC Presentation Nov2015
Nick Tompkins QGC Presentation Nov2015Nick Tompkins
 
Howe Street Basic Project Approach
Howe Street Basic Project ApproachHowe Street Basic Project Approach
Howe Street Basic Project ApproachJasonLhota1
 
Preventive and Predictive maintenance.ppt
Preventive and Predictive maintenance.pptPreventive and Predictive maintenance.ppt
Preventive and Predictive maintenance.pptMamoonurrasheed9
 
Candidate Profile DW 2015
Candidate Profile DW 2015Candidate Profile DW 2015
Candidate Profile DW 2015Daryl Wirges
 
Maintenance & inspection adapted to equipment criticality gunnars & jonsson...
Maintenance & inspection adapted to equipment criticality   gunnars & jonsson...Maintenance & inspection adapted to equipment criticality   gunnars & jonsson...
Maintenance & inspection adapted to equipment criticality gunnars & jonsson...Jens Gunnars
 
Starting kick off meeting
Starting kick   off meetingStarting kick   off meeting
Starting kick off meetingJitesh Gaurav
 
Starting kick off meeting
Starting kick   off meetingStarting kick   off meeting
Starting kick off meetingJitesh Gaurav
 
Baskaren Accomplishments Summary
Baskaren Accomplishments SummaryBaskaren Accomplishments Summary
Baskaren Accomplishments Summaryguest524810
 
IMPROVING OSH & PRODUCTIVITY OF RMG INDUSTRIES BY IMPLEMENTING LEAN TOOLS AN...
IMPROVING OSH & PRODUCTIVITY OF RMG INDUSTRIES BY  IMPLEMENTING LEAN TOOLS AN...IMPROVING OSH & PRODUCTIVITY OF RMG INDUSTRIES BY  IMPLEMENTING LEAN TOOLS AN...
IMPROVING OSH & PRODUCTIVITY OF RMG INDUSTRIES BY IMPLEMENTING LEAN TOOLS AN...Karina Islam
 
2018-11-141Project ManagementClass – 10Project Q
2018-11-141Project ManagementClass – 10Project Q2018-11-141Project ManagementClass – 10Project Q
2018-11-141Project ManagementClass – 10Project Qcargillfilberto
 

Similar to Identifying, Mitigating and Eliminating Risk with an Asset Management Strategy (20)

Merck's West Point Facility Embraces RCM
Merck's West Point Facility Embraces RCMMerck's West Point Facility Embraces RCM
Merck's West Point Facility Embraces RCM
 
Zero Tolerancev
Zero TolerancevZero Tolerancev
Zero Tolerancev
 
Modern Maintenance & Reliability Management: Planning and Estimating Workshop...
Modern Maintenance & Reliability Management: Planning and Estimating Workshop...Modern Maintenance & Reliability Management: Planning and Estimating Workshop...
Modern Maintenance & Reliability Management: Planning and Estimating Workshop...
 
Nick Tompkins QGC Presentation Nov2015
Nick Tompkins QGC Presentation Nov2015Nick Tompkins QGC Presentation Nov2015
Nick Tompkins QGC Presentation Nov2015
 
Howe Street Basic Project Approach
Howe Street Basic Project ApproachHowe Street Basic Project Approach
Howe Street Basic Project Approach
 
Preventive and Predictive maintenance.ppt
Preventive and Predictive maintenance.pptPreventive and Predictive maintenance.ppt
Preventive and Predictive maintenance.ppt
 
Candidate Profile DW 2015
Candidate Profile DW 2015Candidate Profile DW 2015
Candidate Profile DW 2015
 
Maintenance & inspection adapted to equipment criticality gunnars & jonsson...
Maintenance & inspection adapted to equipment criticality   gunnars & jonsson...Maintenance & inspection adapted to equipment criticality   gunnars & jonsson...
Maintenance & inspection adapted to equipment criticality gunnars & jonsson...
 
Starting kick off meeting
Starting kick   off meetingStarting kick   off meeting
Starting kick off meeting
 
Starting kick off meeting
Starting kick   off meetingStarting kick   off meeting
Starting kick off meeting
 
Project mgt lesson plan
Project mgt lesson planProject mgt lesson plan
Project mgt lesson plan
 
Maintenace management and TPM
Maintenace management and TPMMaintenace management and TPM
Maintenace management and TPM
 
Resume
ResumeResume
Resume
 
Baskaren Accomplishments Summary
Baskaren Accomplishments SummaryBaskaren Accomplishments Summary
Baskaren Accomplishments Summary
 
day 3 PMP.pptx
day 3 PMP.pptxday 3 PMP.pptx
day 3 PMP.pptx
 
IMPROVING OSH & PRODUCTIVITY OF RMG INDUSTRIES BY IMPLEMENTING LEAN TOOLS AN...
IMPROVING OSH & PRODUCTIVITY OF RMG INDUSTRIES BY  IMPLEMENTING LEAN TOOLS AN...IMPROVING OSH & PRODUCTIVITY OF RMG INDUSTRIES BY  IMPLEMENTING LEAN TOOLS AN...
IMPROVING OSH & PRODUCTIVITY OF RMG INDUSTRIES BY IMPLEMENTING LEAN TOOLS AN...
 
Resume -UD
Resume -UDResume -UD
Resume -UD
 
2018-11-141Project ManagementClass – 10Project Q
2018-11-141Project ManagementClass – 10Project Q2018-11-141Project ManagementClass – 10Project Q
2018-11-141Project ManagementClass – 10Project Q
 
MHCCV_02-08-16
MHCCV_02-08-16MHCCV_02-08-16
MHCCV_02-08-16
 
TPM CYCLE D
TPM CYCLE DTPM CYCLE D
TPM CYCLE D
 

Recently uploaded

Traction part 2 - EOS Model JAX Bridges.
Traction part 2 - EOS Model JAX Bridges.Traction part 2 - EOS Model JAX Bridges.
Traction part 2 - EOS Model JAX Bridges.Anamaria Contreras
 
Marketplace and Quality Assurance Presentation - Vincent Chirchir
Marketplace and Quality Assurance Presentation - Vincent ChirchirMarketplace and Quality Assurance Presentation - Vincent Chirchir
Marketplace and Quality Assurance Presentation - Vincent Chirchirictsugar
 
International Business Environments and Operations 16th Global Edition test b...
International Business Environments and Operations 16th Global Edition test b...International Business Environments and Operations 16th Global Edition test b...
International Business Environments and Operations 16th Global Edition test b...ssuserf63bd7
 
8447779800, Low rate Call girls in New Ashok Nagar Delhi NCR
8447779800, Low rate Call girls in New Ashok Nagar Delhi NCR8447779800, Low rate Call girls in New Ashok Nagar Delhi NCR
8447779800, Low rate Call girls in New Ashok Nagar Delhi NCRashishs7044
 
Call US-88OO1O2216 Call Girls In Mahipalpur Female Escort Service
Call US-88OO1O2216 Call Girls In Mahipalpur Female Escort ServiceCall US-88OO1O2216 Call Girls In Mahipalpur Female Escort Service
Call US-88OO1O2216 Call Girls In Mahipalpur Female Escort Servicecallgirls2057
 
Cybersecurity Awareness Training Presentation v2024.03
Cybersecurity Awareness Training Presentation v2024.03Cybersecurity Awareness Training Presentation v2024.03
Cybersecurity Awareness Training Presentation v2024.03DallasHaselhorst
 
Buy gmail accounts.pdf Buy Old Gmail Accounts
Buy gmail accounts.pdf Buy Old Gmail AccountsBuy gmail accounts.pdf Buy Old Gmail Accounts
Buy gmail accounts.pdf Buy Old Gmail AccountsBuy Verified Accounts
 
Youth Involvement in an Innovative Coconut Value Chain by Mwalimu Menza
Youth Involvement in an Innovative Coconut Value Chain by Mwalimu MenzaYouth Involvement in an Innovative Coconut Value Chain by Mwalimu Menza
Youth Involvement in an Innovative Coconut Value Chain by Mwalimu Menzaictsugar
 
Ten Organizational Design Models to align structure and operations to busines...
Ten Organizational Design Models to align structure and operations to busines...Ten Organizational Design Models to align structure and operations to busines...
Ten Organizational Design Models to align structure and operations to busines...Seta Wicaksana
 
(Best) ENJOY Call Girls in Faridabad Ex | 8377087607
(Best) ENJOY Call Girls in Faridabad Ex | 8377087607(Best) ENJOY Call Girls in Faridabad Ex | 8377087607
(Best) ENJOY Call Girls in Faridabad Ex | 8377087607dollysharma2066
 
Independent Call Girls Andheri Nightlaila 9967584737
Independent Call Girls Andheri Nightlaila 9967584737Independent Call Girls Andheri Nightlaila 9967584737
Independent Call Girls Andheri Nightlaila 9967584737Riya Pathan
 
8447779800, Low rate Call girls in Tughlakabad Delhi NCR
8447779800, Low rate Call girls in Tughlakabad Delhi NCR8447779800, Low rate Call girls in Tughlakabad Delhi NCR
8447779800, Low rate Call girls in Tughlakabad Delhi NCRashishs7044
 
Call Us 📲8800102216📞 Call Girls In DLF City Gurgaon
Call Us 📲8800102216📞 Call Girls In DLF City GurgaonCall Us 📲8800102216📞 Call Girls In DLF City Gurgaon
Call Us 📲8800102216📞 Call Girls In DLF City Gurgaoncallgirls2057
 
Intro to BCG's Carbon Emissions Benchmark_vF.pdf
Intro to BCG's Carbon Emissions Benchmark_vF.pdfIntro to BCG's Carbon Emissions Benchmark_vF.pdf
Intro to BCG's Carbon Emissions Benchmark_vF.pdfpollardmorgan
 
Pitch Deck Teardown: Geodesic.Life's $500k Pre-seed deck
Pitch Deck Teardown: Geodesic.Life's $500k Pre-seed deckPitch Deck Teardown: Geodesic.Life's $500k Pre-seed deck
Pitch Deck Teardown: Geodesic.Life's $500k Pre-seed deckHajeJanKamps
 
Flow Your Strategy at Flight Levels Day 2024
Flow Your Strategy at Flight Levels Day 2024Flow Your Strategy at Flight Levels Day 2024
Flow Your Strategy at Flight Levels Day 2024Kirill Klimov
 
Memorándum de Entendimiento (MoU) entre Codelco y SQM
Memorándum de Entendimiento (MoU) entre Codelco y SQMMemorándum de Entendimiento (MoU) entre Codelco y SQM
Memorándum de Entendimiento (MoU) entre Codelco y SQMVoces Mineras
 
8447779800, Low rate Call girls in Saket Delhi NCR
8447779800, Low rate Call girls in Saket Delhi NCR8447779800, Low rate Call girls in Saket Delhi NCR
8447779800, Low rate Call girls in Saket Delhi NCRashishs7044
 

Recently uploaded (20)

Traction part 2 - EOS Model JAX Bridges.
Traction part 2 - EOS Model JAX Bridges.Traction part 2 - EOS Model JAX Bridges.
Traction part 2 - EOS Model JAX Bridges.
 
Marketplace and Quality Assurance Presentation - Vincent Chirchir
Marketplace and Quality Assurance Presentation - Vincent ChirchirMarketplace and Quality Assurance Presentation - Vincent Chirchir
Marketplace and Quality Assurance Presentation - Vincent Chirchir
 
International Business Environments and Operations 16th Global Edition test b...
International Business Environments and Operations 16th Global Edition test b...International Business Environments and Operations 16th Global Edition test b...
International Business Environments and Operations 16th Global Edition test b...
 
8447779800, Low rate Call girls in New Ashok Nagar Delhi NCR
8447779800, Low rate Call girls in New Ashok Nagar Delhi NCR8447779800, Low rate Call girls in New Ashok Nagar Delhi NCR
8447779800, Low rate Call girls in New Ashok Nagar Delhi NCR
 
Call US-88OO1O2216 Call Girls In Mahipalpur Female Escort Service
Call US-88OO1O2216 Call Girls In Mahipalpur Female Escort ServiceCall US-88OO1O2216 Call Girls In Mahipalpur Female Escort Service
Call US-88OO1O2216 Call Girls In Mahipalpur Female Escort Service
 
Cybersecurity Awareness Training Presentation v2024.03
Cybersecurity Awareness Training Presentation v2024.03Cybersecurity Awareness Training Presentation v2024.03
Cybersecurity Awareness Training Presentation v2024.03
 
Japan IT Week 2024 Brochure by 47Billion (English)
Japan IT Week 2024 Brochure by 47Billion (English)Japan IT Week 2024 Brochure by 47Billion (English)
Japan IT Week 2024 Brochure by 47Billion (English)
 
Buy gmail accounts.pdf Buy Old Gmail Accounts
Buy gmail accounts.pdf Buy Old Gmail AccountsBuy gmail accounts.pdf Buy Old Gmail Accounts
Buy gmail accounts.pdf Buy Old Gmail Accounts
 
Youth Involvement in an Innovative Coconut Value Chain by Mwalimu Menza
Youth Involvement in an Innovative Coconut Value Chain by Mwalimu MenzaYouth Involvement in an Innovative Coconut Value Chain by Mwalimu Menza
Youth Involvement in an Innovative Coconut Value Chain by Mwalimu Menza
 
Ten Organizational Design Models to align structure and operations to busines...
Ten Organizational Design Models to align structure and operations to busines...Ten Organizational Design Models to align structure and operations to busines...
Ten Organizational Design Models to align structure and operations to busines...
 
(Best) ENJOY Call Girls in Faridabad Ex | 8377087607
(Best) ENJOY Call Girls in Faridabad Ex | 8377087607(Best) ENJOY Call Girls in Faridabad Ex | 8377087607
(Best) ENJOY Call Girls in Faridabad Ex | 8377087607
 
Independent Call Girls Andheri Nightlaila 9967584737
Independent Call Girls Andheri Nightlaila 9967584737Independent Call Girls Andheri Nightlaila 9967584737
Independent Call Girls Andheri Nightlaila 9967584737
 
8447779800, Low rate Call girls in Tughlakabad Delhi NCR
8447779800, Low rate Call girls in Tughlakabad Delhi NCR8447779800, Low rate Call girls in Tughlakabad Delhi NCR
8447779800, Low rate Call girls in Tughlakabad Delhi NCR
 
Call Us 📲8800102216📞 Call Girls In DLF City Gurgaon
Call Us 📲8800102216📞 Call Girls In DLF City GurgaonCall Us 📲8800102216📞 Call Girls In DLF City Gurgaon
Call Us 📲8800102216📞 Call Girls In DLF City Gurgaon
 
Intro to BCG's Carbon Emissions Benchmark_vF.pdf
Intro to BCG's Carbon Emissions Benchmark_vF.pdfIntro to BCG's Carbon Emissions Benchmark_vF.pdf
Intro to BCG's Carbon Emissions Benchmark_vF.pdf
 
Pitch Deck Teardown: Geodesic.Life's $500k Pre-seed deck
Pitch Deck Teardown: Geodesic.Life's $500k Pre-seed deckPitch Deck Teardown: Geodesic.Life's $500k Pre-seed deck
Pitch Deck Teardown: Geodesic.Life's $500k Pre-seed deck
 
Flow Your Strategy at Flight Levels Day 2024
Flow Your Strategy at Flight Levels Day 2024Flow Your Strategy at Flight Levels Day 2024
Flow Your Strategy at Flight Levels Day 2024
 
Memorándum de Entendimiento (MoU) entre Codelco y SQM
Memorándum de Entendimiento (MoU) entre Codelco y SQMMemorándum de Entendimiento (MoU) entre Codelco y SQM
Memorándum de Entendimiento (MoU) entre Codelco y SQM
 
Enjoy ➥8448380779▻ Call Girls In Sector 18 Noida Escorts Delhi NCR
Enjoy ➥8448380779▻ Call Girls In Sector 18 Noida Escorts Delhi NCREnjoy ➥8448380779▻ Call Girls In Sector 18 Noida Escorts Delhi NCR
Enjoy ➥8448380779▻ Call Girls In Sector 18 Noida Escorts Delhi NCR
 
8447779800, Low rate Call girls in Saket Delhi NCR
8447779800, Low rate Call girls in Saket Delhi NCR8447779800, Low rate Call girls in Saket Delhi NCR
8447779800, Low rate Call girls in Saket Delhi NCR
 

Identifying, Mitigating and Eliminating Risk with an Asset Management Strategy

  • 1. Risk Based Asset ManagementRisk-Based Asset Management Identifying, Mitigating and Eliminating Risk with an AssetIdentifying, Mitigating and Eliminating Risk with an Asset Management Strategy Mike Poland, CMRP, Life Cycle Engineering 1© Life Cycle Engineering 2013© Life Cycle Engineering 2013
  • 2. Introduction Name tent introduction Teambuilding/Grouping activity Course learning objectivesCourse learning objectives Participant expectations 2© Life Cycle Engineering 2013
  • 3. Learning Objectives (1 of 2) 1. Describe the four phases in implementing a risk- based asset management programbased asset management program 2. Demonstrate how to effectively classify assets a. Create asset catalogs b. Develop a functional hierarchy 3. Demonstrate methods for analyzing assets a. Perform a criticality analysis b. Create a functional block diagram c. Perform a failure mode and effects analysis 3© Life Cycle Engineering 2013
  • 4. Learning Objectives (2 of 2) 4. Map control strategies to predominant failure modes a. List elements of an effective job plan (PM) b. Develop task modules for a maintenance plan, including resource planningp , g p g 5. List key performance indicators to effectively measure control strategiesg 6. Calculate overall equipment effectiveness 4© Life Cycle Engineering 2013
  • 5. The Model:The Model: Risk-Based Asset Management SStrategy 5© Life Cycle Engineering 2013
  • 6. Risk-Based Asset Management Model •Learning to OPERATIONAL STABILITY Learning to See MeasureMeasureControlControlAnalyzeAnalyzeClassifyClassify Process Flow Diagram Value Stream Mapping Relationship Models Equipment Criticality Failure Analysis Risk Analysis Standard Work Operating Procedures Preventive Predictive Condition Monitoring R t M it i OEE TCO Asset Utilization MTBFy Risk Ranking Remote Monitoring Operator Care Critical Spares MTBF MTTR Continuous ImprovementContinuous Improvement PlanPlan DoDo CheckCheck ActAct 6© Life Cycle Engineering 2013
  • 7. Strategy documented in a planStrategy documented in a plan Asset Management Plan Key CComponents 7© Life Cycle Engineering 2013
  • 8. Key Components • Asset Operation Planp • Asset Risk Plan • Asset Maintenance Plan• Asset Maintenance Plan 8© Life Cycle Engineering 2013
  • 9. Asset Management Plan Asset Operations Plan Asset Maintenance Plan Asset Risk Plan Operating Parameters Planned Utilization Maintenance Parameters Asset Hierarchy Risk Parameters Risk strategy, tolerance Staffing Requirements Raw/WIP Materials Requirements Materials Handling Requirements Energy/Utilities Requirements Continuous Operating Hours Production Schedule Variation Criticality Ranking Index Failure Modes and Effects Maximum Continuous Operation Mean-time-between-failure Mean-time-between-maintenance Mean-time-to-repair Risk definition and categorization Loss data collection Risk indicator data collection Control self-assessment Risk assessment and analysis Expected/Unexpected Incoming Materials Specifications Finished Products Specifications Production Minimum Lot Size Planned Capital Life Performance Variables (KPIs) Performance Tracking Process p Mean-time-to-rebuild PM/PdM Requirements Overhaul/Rebuild Requirements Skills/Staffing Requirements Anticipated Useful Life Performance Variables (KPIs) Expected/Unexpected Loss Control Scores Real exposures Controls quality Cost benefit analysis Risk mitigation and transferPerformance Tracking Process Business Risk Assessment Performance Variables (KPIs) Reliability Risk Assessment Standard Work strategy 9© Life Cycle Engineering 2013 Standard Work
  • 10. The Asset Operation Plan • Standard operating proceduresp g p • Start-up / Shut–down procedures • Materials procedures• Materials procedures • Operator care procedures 10© Life Cycle Engineering 2013
  • 11. The Asset Risk Plan • Risk identification • Risk analysis • Risk mitigation 1. Identify the Hazards 6. Supervise and Review Risk mitigation • Communication plan 2. Assess the Risks 5. Implement Risk Controls plan • Risk management table 3. Analyze Risk Control Measures 4. Make Control Decisions table 11© Life Cycle Engineering 2013
  • 12. The Benefits of Risk Management MANAGEMENT • Awareness of real exposures INFORMATION • Expected Loss – how much do I lose on average? • Unexpected Loss DATA exposures • Knowledge of controls quality • Cost benefit analysis • Improved risk mitigation and Eco FOUNDATION • Risk strategy, tolerance • Unexpected Loss – how much I could reasonably expect to lose in a bad year? • Control Scores – • Loss data collection • Risk indicator data collection • Control self- assessment mitigation and transfer strategy onomicPro • Roles and responsibilities • Policies and procedures • Risk definition and categori ation how good are the controls I have in place? • Risk assessment and analysis • Automatic notification • Follow-up action reports ofit © American Society for Quality categorization 12© Life Cycle Engineering 2013 Management & Control Quality
  • 13. The Asset Maintenance Plan The Infrastructure: • Database development• Database development • Asset definitions • Required attributes • Functional/Reliability block diagramsy g • Hierarchy development • Criticality analysis• Criticality analysis • Failure mode and effects analysis 13© Life Cycle Engineering 2013
  • 14. The Asset Maintenance Plan Task module creation • Mapping failure modes to failure detection• Mapping failure modes to failure detection methods R b ild/R f bi h t it i• Rebuild/Refurbishment criteria • Assigning crafts and trades • Determining frequency • Establishing durationsEstablishing durations • Level loading tasks 14© Life Cycle Engineering 2013
  • 15. The Asset Maintenance Plan Developing preventive maintenance tasksp g p • Failure-based • Comprehensive procedureComprehensive procedure • Organized structure • Repeatable results • Acceptance criteria 15© Life Cycle Engineering 2013
  • 16. The Asset Maintenance Plan Predictive technologies – the big 5g g 1. Thermography 2 Oil analysis2. Oil analysis 3. Ultrasonic analysis 4. Vibration analysis 5. Motor Current analysis 16© Life Cycle Engineering 2013
  • 17. The Asset Maintenance Plan MRO supportpp • Developing bill of materials • Determining critical spare part thresholdsDetermining critical spare part thresholds C ti i tContinuous improvement • Value metrics • Feedback process 17© Life Cycle Engineering 2013
  • 18. •Learning to See MeasureControlAnalyzeClassify Process Flow Diagram Value Stream Mapping Relationship Models Equipment Criticality Failure Analysis Risk Analysis Risk Ranking Standard Work Operating Procedures Preventive Predictive Condition Monitoring Remote Monitoring Operator Care OEE TCO Asset Utilization MTBF MTTROperator Care Critical Spares Continuous Improvement Plan Do Check Act Classify Phasey Value Stream Maps 18© Life Cycle Engineering 2013
  • 19. Classify Phase • Process flow diagramsg • Value stream maps • Asset catalogsAsset catalogs 19© Life Cycle Engineering 2013
  • 20. Value Stream Mapping • A pictorial representation of the flow of material and information as the product is being built • Follow a product’s production path from beginning to end, and draw a visual t ti f i threpresentation of every process in the material and information flows D “f ” f h l• Draw a “future state” map of how value should flow 20© Life Cycle Engineering 2013
  • 21. VSM Icons 21© Life Cycle Engineering 2013
  • 22. VSM Icons 22© Life Cycle Engineering 2013
  • 23. Current State Mapping • Understand how the shop floor currently operates • Material and information flows • Start with the “door to door” flow • Draw using iconsDraw using icons • Walk the flow and get actual numbers N t d d ti• No standard times • Draw by hand with pencil 23© Life Cycle Engineering 2013
  • 24. Current State Map Supplier Customer Quarterly Forecast Daily Ordering Monthly Forecast Weekly Deliveries Planning & Control 25 / Day Weekly Shipments Weekly S h d l Daily Ship S h d lSchedule ScheduleDaily Check 68Parts C/T = 12 min C/O = 0 min U/T = 85% OP60 (Ship) OP50OP40OP30OP20OP10 10Parts 5Parts 4Parts 12Parts 8Parts C/T = 21 min C/O = 0 min U/T = 85% C/T = 21 min C/O = 0 min U/T = 85% C/T = 21 min C/O = 0 min C/T = 24 min C/O = 0 min I IIIII U/T 85% 12 min 0.32days0.4 days 21 min 0.2 days 21 min 0.16 days 0.48 days 21 min 24 min 99 min 4.28 days U/T = 85% U/T = 85% C/O = 0 min U/T = 85% C/O 0 U/T = 85% Takt Time = 450min /25 pieces = 18 2.72 days 24© Life Cycle Engineering 2013 a t e 50 / 5 p eces 8 min
  • 25. •Learning to See MeasureControlAnalyzeClassify Process Flow Diagram Value Stream Mapping Relationship Models Equipment Criticality Failure Analysis Risk Analysis Risk Ranking Standard Work Operating Procedures Preventive Predictive Condition Monitoring Remote Monitoring Operator Care OEE TCO Asset Utilization MTBF MTTROperator Care Critical Spares Continuous Improvement Plan Do Check Act Classify Phase:y Hierarchy Development 25© Life Cycle Engineering 2013
  • 26. Hierarchy Development Hierarchy is the systematic classification ofy y items into generic groups based on factors possibly common to several of the items ( )(location, use, equipment subdivision, etc.) in a parent – child relationship. 26© Life Cycle Engineering 2013
  • 27. Functional Hierarchy (1) Business Category (2) tionData Discuss this model and the Functional Hierarchy Guidelines in your(2) Installation/ Business Unit (3) Cost Center/ Op Unit Use/Locat Guidelines in your workbook (pg. 7) (4) Function (5) System n System (6) Sub system/asset ntSubdivisio (7) Component/Maintainable Item (8) Part/ BOM Equipmen 27© Life Cycle Engineering 2013 Part/ BOM
  • 28. Functional Hierarchy Activity 1. Join into groups 2. Determine a system where an air compressor would be in operation 3. Refer to the compressor user guide 4. Create a functional hierarchy, mapped to they, pp motor as the lowest maintainable asset a. You can use the pyramid model, levels 1-9y to organize your hierarchy 28© Life Cycle Engineering 2013
  • 29. Client - 1 Company ABC Hierarchy Facility - 2 ABC Plant ABC y Answer Key Building - 3 Function - 4 Building 312 Distribution y System - 5 Distribution Pneumatic Drive S t Sub-system - 6 System Air Compressor Component - 7 Part /BOM - 8 Motor Gasket 29© Life Cycle Engineering 2013
  • 30. Asset Definition • Once the hierarchy is established, the level 7y , components are standardized into asset types and minimum attributes are assigned to support: – BOM development – PM/PdM development – Failure analysis 30© Life Cycle Engineering 2013
  • 31. Asset Data Detailed information such as: • Asset criticality • Nameplate dataNameplate data • Engineering specification • Property detailProperty detail • Other searchable characteristics 31© Life Cycle Engineering 2013
  • 32. Data Collection Guidelines • Workbook has Data Collection Guidelines for reference (pg 9)reference (pg. 9) • Discuss – Data collection process – Field data gathering 32© Life Cycle Engineering 2013
  • 33. •Learning to See MeasureControlAnalyzeClassify Process Flow Diagram Value Stream Mapping Relationship Models Equipment Criticality Failure Analysis Risk Analysis Risk Ranking Standard Work Operating Procedures Preventive Predictive Condition Monitoring Remote Monitoring Operator Care OEE TCO Asset Utilization MTBF MTTROperator Care Critical Spares Continuous Improvement Plan Do Check Act Analyze Phase:y Criticality Analysis 33© Life Cycle Engineering 2013
  • 34. Criticality Analysis • Criticality is defined as a state of importance.y p • As a measure, it represents the severity of a failure in relation to its consequences.q • Equipment criticality is a ranking reflecting the magnitude of the consequences resulting frommagnitude of the consequences resulting from an equipment failure. 34© Life Cycle Engineering 2013
  • 35. Contributors to Criticality Consequences usually considered are theq y impact on: • Environment • Health • Safetyy • Production or value stream • ReputationReputation 35© Life Cycle Engineering 2013
  • 36. Criticality Thought Process Determining function of equipment, system, item process, etc. Is it main equipment or an auxiliary item? Is it a unique Item or common with others? Redundancy – Duplication – Alternative Do you have a standby backup? Do you have alternative means to continue normal operation? What is the likelihood of a failure mode occurring? (High/low) Consider history of failures for equipment Consider possibility and frequency of failures What are the consequences of failure? Any production losses as a result of failure? How much? Any safety, environmental, or business losses as a result of failure? What is the likely period out of operation? Can the repair be done on site? Are spare parts available? How long to get parts if not in stock? What is the longest time for repairing the failure? 36© Life Cycle Engineering 2013 What is the longest time for repairing the failure?
  • 37. •Learning to See MeasureControlAnalyzeClassify Process Flow Diagram Value Stream Mapping Relationship Models Equipment Criticality Failure Analysis Risk Analysis Risk Ranking Standard Work Operating Procedures Preventive Predictive Condition Monitoring Remote Monitoring Operator Care OEE TCO Asset Utilization MTBF MTTROperator Care Critical Spares Continuous Improvement Plan Do Check Act Analyze Phase: Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA) 37© Life Cycle Engineering 2013
  • 38. Block Diagrams • The precursor to developing a functionalp p g hierarchy and a maintenance strategy is the functional and reliability block diagrams. 38© Life Cycle Engineering 2013
  • 39. Block Diagrams • Functional and reliability block diagramsy g illustrate the operation, interrelationships, and interdependencies of functional entities. • More than one block diagram will usually be required to display alternative modes of operation, depending upon the definition established for the system. 39© Life Cycle Engineering 2013
  • 40. Functional Block Diagram: Purpose • The primary purpose of the functional blockp y p p diagram (FDB) is to ensure that the RE determines all of the functions provided by and /within the asset and/or system so that functional failures can be determined and analyzedanalyzed. 40© Life Cycle Engineering 2013
  • 41. FBD: Description • Shows major system components, their functional relationships to one another, and the incoming and t i i t foutgoing interfaces. • Includes: – Interfaces to distributive systemsInterfaces to distributive systems – Interfaces between subsystems – Power, data, and structural interfaces Out interfaces represent active functions– Out interfaces represent active functions – Passive functions, such as containment of fluids, may be internal to the functional block diagram Note: For purposes of failure analysis, the RE assumes that all incoming functions are available 41© Life Cycle Engineering 2013
  • 42. FBD Example Temperature& Pressure Readout Instrumentation& Monitors 20 Automatic Shutdown Signals (Temperature & High Pressure) Signal to Control Valve Electrical Control Motor 10 Electric Power Pump 50 High Pressure Torque Pressure Control Valve Bearing Lubrication System 30 50 Oil Mist Water60 Fresh Water Sump Fresh Water Suction 40 Clean Fresh Water Strainer 42© Life Cycle Engineering 2013
  • 43. Functional Block Diagram Activity 1. Join with a partner or group 2. Distribute the air compressor user manual (handout) 3 Review the user manual3. Review the user manual 4. Draft an FBD for the air compressor a Sho major s stem componentsa. Show major system components b. Show relationships between systems c. Show ingoing and outgoing interfaces 43© Life Cycle Engineering 2013
  • 44. Answer – FBD Activity PRESSURE READOUT INSTRUMENTATION & AUTOMATIC STARTUP MONITORSSHUT DOWN ELECTRIC CONTROL MOTOR COMPRESSOR PRV 120 VAC TORQUE PRESSURIZED AIR CUT IN 95 PSI PRESSURE RELIEF @ 125 PSI TANK 2 GALLON CAPACITY 44© Life Cycle Engineering 2013
  • 45. FMEA • Developed by US military and standardized byp y y y automotive industry • Top-down method • Based on industrial and in-plant historical data • Generally limited to major sub-systemsy j y Can include components, but failure modes, probability of failure, etc. based on experience, not b bilit t blprobability tables 45© Life Cycle Engineering 2013
  • 46. Example Of FMEA Analysis Pass out completed example FMEA for class to see 46© Life Cycle Engineering 2013 OR show onscreen example (RBAM FMEA completed example)
  • 47. Terms • Occurrence ranking:g – A subjective estimate of the probability that a failure mode will occur. – What different variables or factors are involved in determining occurrence? 47© Life Cycle Engineering 2013
  • 48. Terms • Detection ranking:g – A subjective estimate of the probability that a cause of a potential failure will be detected and corrected before reaching the end user. – A subjective estimate of the probability that a cause of a potential failure will be d t t d d t d b f f ildetected and corrected before a failure can occur. 48© Life Cycle Engineering 2013
  • 49. Terms • Risk Priority Number (RPN):y ( ) – The product of severity, occurrence, and detection rankings – Severity x Occurrence x Detection = RPN – Sometimes divided by 30 to give you a 100– Sometimes divided by 30 to give you a 100 scale 49© Life Cycle Engineering 2013
  • 50. Uses of FMEA 1. Root-cause failure analysis a Methodology for understanding potential forcing functionsa. Methodology for understanding potential forcing functions that caused problem 2. Drives preventive maintenance programp p g a. Identified forcing functions and failure modes determine the specific PM inspections that should be done to preserve the asset and prevent failures 3. Drives asset management program a. Determines the fundamental requirements, e.g. operations and maintenance, for the asset 4. Drives asset utilization plans 50© Life Cycle Engineering 2013
  • 51. Uses of FMEA 5. Drives modifications and upgrades a. Many of the identified forcing functions and failure modes can be eliminated by specific modifications or changes inspecific modifications or changes in design 6 Drives standard work practices (SWP)6. Drives standard work practices (SWP) upgrades a Forcing functions or failures caused bya. Forcing functions or failures caused by setup or operating methods can be eliminated 51© Life Cycle Engineering 2013
  • 52. Reliability Engineering FMEA • Engineer must understand the machine org production system – Machine or operating dynamics – Inherent design strengths and limitations – Failure modes of components, sub-assemblies andp , systems • Requires homework and self-study to gain thisq y g knowledge 52© Life Cycle Engineering 2013
  • 53. Reliability Engineering FMEA • Must be driven or supported by data – Focus Team FMEA relies exclusively on “native knowledge” – Engineering FMEA also uses, but all three criteria must be verified using existing historical data • Level of detail must be as good as can be accomplished – Focus Team uses 80-20 rule – Engineering must strive for at least 90-10 53© Life Cycle Engineering 2013
  • 54. FMEA Activity: Air Compressor 1. On the FMEA form (handout) list two t ti l f ti l f ilpotential functional failures 2. List five possible failure modes for any of the functional failures of the compressorfunctional failures of the compressor a. See functional block diagram and list of failure mode descriptors in workbookfailure mode descriptors in workbook 3. Input failure effects into the form f f4. Input failure causes into the form 5. Enter data given in instructions to calculate RPN 54© Life Cycle Engineering 2013 RPN
  • 55. •Learning to See MeasureControlAnalyzeClassify Process Flow Diagram Value Stream Mapping Relationship Models Equipment Criticality Failure Analysis Risk Analysis Risk Ranking Standard Work Operating Procedures Preventive Predictive Condition Monitoring Remote Monitoring Operator Care OEE TCO Asset Utilization MTBF MTTROperator Care Critical Spares Continuous Improvement Plan Do Check Act Control Phase: Effective Job Plans 55© Life Cycle Engineering 2013
  • 56. The PM Process PlPlan DoAct CheckCheck 56© Life Cycle Engineering 2013
  • 57. The PM Program High Op Total Maintenance Cost BLost Production peratingBudget Proactive Maintenance B MaintenanceCost Lost Production Caused by Failures Lack of PM Access M ts Cost of PMCost of Repairs Maintenance Budget Level of MaintenanceLow High Low 57© Life Cycle Engineering 2013
  • 58. Three Phases of PM DetectionDetection • The key element Analysis • Defines the specific problem from hi h th t i i twhich the symptom originates Correction • The return of the PM/PdM investment 58© Life Cycle Engineering 2013
  • 59. Understand Degradation Process Avoid consequence of failure Functional failure- System not meeting All requirements Onset of failure Detect potential failure- system meeting all requirements Cond qequ e e ts dition Maintenance Window Pending Failure not detected Broken Time Window “PF interval" Performance Losses 59© Life Cycle Engineering 2013 Source: Ivara Corp, Hamilton, Ontario Time
  • 60. P-F Interval Curve and Domains Changes in Vibration P- F interval 1-9 months Thermography Thermal Anomalies interval 1-3 months Acoustic Emissions Ultrasound Wear Debris in oil interval 1-6 months Audible noise P- F interval 1-4 Ultrasound interval 1-10 months P2P1 weeks Heat by touch P- F interval 1-5 days P3 P2 days Predictive Domain Protective Domain Failure (bearing seizes) PLUS F Elimination Program Identification program 60© Life Cycle Engineering 2013 Collateral Damage Source: Allied Services Group
  • 61. PM Inspection Results • Inspection feedback is essential • Feedback should identify potential equipment conditions needing correctiveequipment conditions needing corrective action Th b f ti k d• The number of corrective work orders helps to refine the PM program • Rule of thumb: Every six inspections should result in one corrective work order 61© Life Cycle Engineering 2013
  • 62. •Learning to See MeasureControlAnalyzeClassify Process Flow Diagram Value Stream Mapping Relationship Models Equipment Criticality Failure Analysis Risk Analysis Risk Ranking Standard Work Operating Procedures Preventive Predictive Condition Monitoring Remote Monitoring Operator Care OEE TCO Asset Utilization MTBF MTTROperator Care Critical Spares Continuous Improvement Plan Do Check Act Control Phase: Maintenance Plan Task Modules 62© Life Cycle Engineering 2013
  • 63. Task Creation Guidelines • Step-through Task Creation Guidelines sheet in workbook (pg. 19) • Review the Example Task Module on next slide (pg. 24) 63© Life Cycle Engineering 2013
  • 64. Example Task Module EQUIPMENT NUMBER DESCRIPTION LOCATION DOCUMENTATION VALIDATED ITEM# FREQUENCY (Days) CRAFT CRAFTSMEN REQD EQUIPMENT CONDITION TYPE EST.TIME(Hrs) ANNUAL(Hrs) 01 1 ENG/RM 1 RUNNING PM 0DAILY SERVICING ROUTINES 305-2-1 Disc Brake System Drill Floor Maintenance Manual SPECIAL TOOLS/MATERIALS REMARKS 305-2-1 Drawworks, Dreco SSGD-750-GE Drill Floor General Service Manual MAINTENANCE TASK DESCRIPTION PROCEDURE/ TASK# 01 1 ENG/RM 1 RUNNING PM 0 02 7 ENG/RM 1 SHUTDOWN PM 0 03 30 ENG/RM 1 SHUTDOWN PM 0 04 90 CE 1 SHUTDOWN PM 0 05 180 ENG/RM 1 SHUTDOWN PM 0 CHECK DISC BRAKE FRICTION PADS, CHECK LUBE OIL PUMPS, CHECK HYDRAULIC OIL PUMPS AND ACCUMULATOR BOTTLES, LUBRICATE TORQUE ARM AND INSPECT WIRE ROPE INSPECT LUBE OIL DISTRIBUTION LINES, CHECK GEAR OIL SPRAY NOZZLES, CHECK OPERATION OF HYDRAULIC PUMPS, INSPECT DRAWWORKS DRIVE GEARS, INSPECT THE TORQUE ARMS, OBTAIN LUBE OIL AND HYDRAULIC OIL INSPECT INTEGRITY OF ELECTRICAL COMPONENTS DAILY SERVICING ROUTINES WEEKLY SERVICING ROUTINES 06 360 ENG/RM 1 SHUTDOWN PM 0 VERIFY OPERATION OF ISOLATION BARRIERS, CHECK PRESSURE SAMPLE, REMOVE AND REPLACE LUBE OIL FILTER ELEMENT, REMOVE AND REPLACE HYDRAULIC OIL FILTER ELEMENT INSPECT GEARS, CHECK HIGH SPEED GEAR WOBBLE, CHECK PINION GEAR BACKLASH, CHECK PINION GEAR TOOTH CONTACT, INSPECT, DISASSEMBLE AND CLEAN LUBE OIL COOLING PLATE HEAT EXCHANGER, INSPECT PIPING, HOSES, CONNECTIONS AND FOUNDATION FASTENERS, DRAIN AND FLUSH HYDRAULIC POWER UNIT, CHECK BRAKE CALIPER DELAY SYSTEM, CHECK BRAKE DISK CONDITION AND NDE INSPECTION OF FOUNDATION BOLTS 07 360 CE 1 SHUTDOWN PM 0 08 1800 ENG/RM 2 SHUTDOWN PM 0 09 1800 ENG/RM 5 SHUTDOWN PM 0 PERFORM COMPLETE OVERHAUL AND NDE OF DRAWWORKS ASSEMBLY, REMOVE AND REPLACE HPU AND HYDRAULIC SYSTEM HOSES, REPLACE DRAWWORKS BRAKE CALIPER SPRING PACKS, NDE CALIPER PISTONS, NDE CALIPER MOUNT AND GUIDE BARS CHECK BRAKE CALIPERS ALIGNMENT PERFORM CONDITION EVALUATION OF DRAWWORKS PRIOR TO SPS - TO DETERMINE OVERHAUL REQUIREMENTS TRANSMITTERS, TEMPERATURE SWITCHES, LEVEL SWITCHES, DIFFERENTIAL PRESSURE SWITCH, VALVE ON/OFF SOLENOID, HAND OPERATED SWITCH, ENCODER AND DEADLINE ANCHOR PRESSURE TRANSMITTER 09 1800 ENG/RM 5 SHUTDOWN PM 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 CALIPER MOUNT AND GUIDE BARS, CHECK BRAKE CALIPERS ALIGNMENT, INSPECT DRAWWORKS LUBRICATION SYSTEM, CHECK LUBE OIL PRESSURE RELIEF AND FLOW CONTROL VALVES, AND NDE FOUNDATION BOLTS AND SKID WELDS ANNUAL SCHEDULED MAINTENANCE HRS ANNUAL SHUTDOWN HRS ANNUAL SENIOR TOOLPUSHER/DRILLING HRS ANNUAL CHIEF ENGINEER/MECHANIC HRS 64© Life Cycle Engineering 2013 0.0 0.0 ANNUAL CHIEF ELECTRICIAN HRS ANNUAL 3RD PARTY HRS
  • 65. Task Module Activity • Join in groupsg p • Draft at least four maintenance tasks into the blank Task Module Worksheet (workbook, pg.25) • Resources: – Task Module Guidelines (workbook) – Compressor user guide – Example task module 65© Life Cycle Engineering 2013
  • 66. •Learning to See MeasureControlAnalyzeClassify Process Flow Diagram Value Stream Mapping Relationship Models Equipment Criticality Failure Analysis Risk Analysis Risk Ranking Standard Work Operating Procedures Preventive Predictive Condition Monitoring Remote Monitoring Operator Care OEE TCO Asset Utilization MTBF MTTROperator Care Critical Spares Continuous Improvement Plan Do Check Act Measure Phase: Key Performance Indicators 66© Life Cycle Engineering 2013
  • 67. Which Measures to Use? • Review the KPI definitions in o r KPIs for your RBAM definitions in your workbook as we detail each KPI (pg. program: • OEE 28) – Formula – Purpose • Maintenance cost per RAV Purpose – Data source – Links to business RASI • PM compliance – RASI – Frequency 67© Life Cycle Engineering 2013
  • 68. Maintenance Cost per RAV Total Maintenance Cost Replacement Asset Value (RAV) • Total Maintenance Cost: all labor, material, and contract services required to maintain facility assets • Replacement Asset Value: value of replacing i ti t t t t ti texisting assets at current construction costs, using like technologies 68© Life Cycle Engineering 2013
  • 69. Review other KPI elements Maintenance Cost per RAV:p – Data source – Links to businessLinks to business – RASI – FrequencyFrequency 69© Life Cycle Engineering 2013
  • 70. PM Compliance # of Scheduled PM Work Orders Completed # of Scheduled PM Work Orders The acceptance criteria should be within 10% of the scheduled frequency of the PM. For example, for a monthly (30 day) PM work order to be considered an “on-time l ti ” it ld b li h d ithicompletion,” it would be accomplished within 3 days (plus or minus) of the scheduled date. 70© Life Cycle Engineering 2013
  • 71. Review Other KPI Elements Predictive Maintenance Compliance:p – Data source – Links to businessLinks to business – RASI – FrequencyFrequency 71© Life Cycle Engineering 2013
  • 72. •Learning to See MeasureControlAnalyzeClassify Process Flow Diagram Value Stream Mapping Relationship Models Equipment Criticality Failure Analysis Risk Analysis Risk Ranking Standard Work Operating Procedures Preventive Predictive Condition Monitoring Remote Monitoring Operator Care OEE TCO Asset Utilization MTBF MTTROperator Care Critical Spares Continuous Improvement Plan Do Check Act Measure Phase: Calculate OEE 72© Life Cycle Engineering 2013
  • 73. Measuring Losses from Ideal (Lean) PerformancePerformance Theory Of Constraints 10% 10% 100% 15% 20% 15% 10% 15% 10% 10% 20% 25% 80% 90% Time Loss 10% 20% 15% 10% 20% 5% 5% 10% 10% 10% 60% 70% Time Loss Rate Loss Yield Loss No Demand Asset Utilization 10% 5%0% 40% 50% 30% Step #1 Step #2 Step #3 Step #4 Step #5 Manufacturing Process Steps CustomerRAW 73© Life Cycle Engineering 2013 Manufacturing Process Steps
  • 74. Uptime (OEE) Operating Time Scheduled Time Uptime (%) = Note: Uptime only excludes “lack of sales/demand” Scheduled Time p y 74© Life Cycle Engineering 2013
  • 75. Rate Average Rate R t (%) Best Demonstrated or Design Rate Rate (%) = Note: The Best Demonstrated Rate or Design Rate, use the greater of the two. Best Demonstrated corresponds to three highest consecutive days (1% of annual time). If data is only available by week, then use best one week (2%). 75© Life Cycle Engineering 2013
  • 76. Quality First Pass Units *Q lit (%) First Pass Units Total Units *Quality (%) = Note: The FPQ corresponds to the volume (Units) of product within specification when the(Units) of product within specification when the material leaves the production line or machine, compared to the total volume (Units) quantitycompared to the total volume (Units) quantity processed by the production line or machine. * Place holder term sometimes referred to as yield 76© Life Cycle Engineering 2013 Place holder term sometimes referred to as yield
  • 77. Daily Logging OEE Review the OEE Daily Log sheet in your workbook forReview the OEE Daily Log sheet in your workbook for an example of how to calculate OEE on a daily basis (pg. 31). 77© Life Cycle Engineering 2013
  • 78. OEE Calculator Activity • Calculate the business case potential for OEEp using the OEE Calculator activity in your workbook (pg. 32). • What do the results tell you about how to use OEE to manage your program? 78© Life Cycle Engineering 2013
  • 79. OEE Scenario Activity 1. Read the OEE scenario in yourscenario in your workbook (pg. 33). 2. Determine the OEE for the d ti liproduction line. 3. Graph the asset tili ation lossesutilization losses per the scenario. 79© Life Cycle Engineering 2013 scenario.
  • 80. Making OEE a Leading, Visual Indicator ng r and ator led me uled me over of al ct Operati Hour NoDema NoOpera Schedu Downtim Unsched Downtim Change-o Lacko Materia Defec U C 1 X X X 2 X X 3 X 4 X 5 X X 6 X 7 X X 8 X 80© Life Cycle Engineering 2013 8 X
  • 81. Total Cost of Ownershipp 81© Life Cycle Engineering 2013
  • 83. The Four Phase RBAM Model: R i d A ti PlReview and Action Plan 83© Life Cycle Engineering 2013
  • 84. RBAM Four Phase Review OPERATIONAL STABILITY •Learning to See MeasureControlAnalyzeClassify Process Flow Diagram Value Stream Mapping Relationship Models Equipment Criticality Failure Analysis Standard Work Operating Procedures Preventive Predictive C diti M it i OEE TCO Asset UtilizationRelationship Models y Risk Analysis Risk Ranking Condition Monitoring Remote Monitoring Operator Care Critical Spares Asset Utilization MTBF MTTR Continuous Improvement Plan Do Check Act 84© Life Cycle Engineering 2013
  • 85. RBAM Action Plan • Use the four-phase template in your workbook to develop an action plan (pg.34). Include: – Activities to target in all four phases: classify, analyze control measureanalyze, control, measure – Specific actions you will take in the next 30 days to support RBAMdays to support RBAM – Support you will need to build the RBAM program at your site • Debrief your plan to the class 85© Life Cycle Engineering 2013
  • 87. Thank You! Interested in learning more? Mike Poland CMRPMike Poland, CMRP Dir., Asset Management Services MPoland@LCE.com@ www.LCE.com Visit Life Cycle Engineering at Booth #908 87© Life Cycle Engineering 2013