1. STRESS MAPPING FOR
RE- ORIENTATION OF GALLERIES IN
PVK-5 Incl.
Dr.D.N.SHARMA
Dy.General Manager(Geo)
Exploration Division / RG1
• In PVK mine, King Seam workings reached 400m depth.
• Thickness of the King Seam in the study area is about 6.50m with a
gradient of 1 in 8.
• King seam was developed in the Top Section upto 116 Level, with
Sandstone as immediate roof.
• Since there is a problem with sever seepage of water along sandstone
roof , an attempt was made to leave about 3.50m seam portion in the roof.
• In the changed working section, another problem of severe roof
failures in Level galleries cropped out.
1. PROBLEMS IN KING SEAM
2. 2. STRESS MAPPING IN QUEEN SEAM
With a similar problem in overlying Queen Seam workings that is beyond 110
Level at a depth of 350m, Stress mapping was carried out, during June
2004. The inferences of those studies were-
The Major Principal Stress axis inferred from most prominent
Joint set (J1) is perpendicular to Level galleries are contributing
for instability of level galleries.
Minor Principal Stress axis inferred from least prominent Joint
set (J3) is parallel to level galleries.
Conversely, Dip galleries are stable as they are almost (with
about 5 degrees) parallel to the Major Principal Stress axis.
Further, these findings were closely matching with that of
Stress Orientation established earlier in the Queen Seam of
adjacent VK-7 Shaft through similar Stress Mapping technique.
3. CONTOUR DIAGRAM OF JOINTS PLOTTED ON
EQUAL AREA PROJECTION,LOWER HEMISPHERE,
QUEEN SEAM (100 JOINT POLES)
DIRECTION OF STRAIN ELLIPSOID
DEVELOPED IN QUEEN SEAM
4. 3. STRESS MAPPING IN KING SEAM
1. Stress mapping is carried out in the present study area in King Seam.
2. The workings crossed 400 m. depth line and approaching the F16 Fault
(throw 20m) in the dip side property.
3. The details of structural features mapped are as follows -
SL.NO STRUCTURAL FEATURE NO.OF READINGS. MEAN TREND
1 FACE CLEAT
140
N550E
2 BUTT CLEAT N350W
3 MOST PROMINENT SLIPS
40
N450 E
4 LEAST PROMINENT SLIPS N650E
5 MOST PROMINENT JOINTS
27
N550E
6 LEAST PROMINENT JOINTS N650E
3. STRESS MAPPING IN KING SEAM
Contd…
4. The causative factors of unstable roof conditions are due to :
• The most prominent Slips S1 aligned to the greatest principal
stress direction (N450E) is responsible for the roof instability
confined to level galleries.
• Roof strata consists of thin layers and leading to failure in level
galleries with an indication of "Gutter roof". Trend of the "Gutter
roof" ,largely helped to confirm the orientation of principal stress in
the study area.
• As workings are enveloped by Faults, sympathetic slips developed
and contributed for unstable roof conditions.
• These findings are closely matching with that of Stress Orientation
established in the overlying Queen Seam.
6. SLIP IN THE PILLAR SHOWING
DISPLACEMENT OF BANDS
J1 JOINT EXPOSED IN THE FLOOR
7. 4. ROCK MASS RATING (RMR)
RMR classified the roof of working section of King Seam (Bottom
Section) as "FAIR“ with a rating of 41, where 40 is border of “Poor”
and “Fair” rock.
8. “ROOF GUTTERING” IN THE CENTER OF LEVEL GALLERY BEFORE
RE-ORIENTATION
5. NUMERICAL MODELLING BY CIMFR
Numerical modelling was taken up by CIMFR and the following conclusions
and recommendations are made:
1. The magnitude of major and minor in situ horizontal stresses in King
seam in the study area are found to be 7.15 Mpa and 3.68 Mpa
respectively.
2. The direction of the major in situ horizontal stress is found to be along
N 450 E , which is almost perpendicular to the level galleries.
3. Keeping the above directions and magnitude of in situ horizontal
stresses in view, level gallery can be driven along N 850 E to
E 50 S (with a stress point of view).
10. STABLE ROOF IN THE LEVEL GALLERY AFTER RE ORIENTATION
7. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS
1. PHYSICAL MAPPING LARGELY HELPED TO DERIVE STRESS
ORIENTATION IN THE STUDY AREA TO BE N450E.
2. THE DATA IS VALIDATED WITH THAT OF OVERLYING QUEEN
SEAM AS WELL AS ADJACENT BLOCK i.e. VK-7 SHAFT.
3. FURTHER IT IS VALIDATED WITH NUMERICAL MODELLING DATA.
4. FINDINGS OF ALL THE ABOVE STUDIES ARE IN GOOD
AGREEMENT WITH EACH OTHER.
5. BASED ON THE RECOMMANDATIONS (to drive Level Galleries in
N850E) OF ABOVE STUDIES, STABLE ROOF CONDITIONS COULD
BE ESTABLISHED.
******