SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 11
Download to read offline
STRESS MAPPING FOR
RE- ORIENTATION OF GALLERIES IN
PVK-5 Incl.
Dr.D.N.SHARMA
Dy.General Manager(Geo)
Exploration Division / RG1
• In PVK mine, King Seam workings reached 400m depth.
• Thickness of the King Seam in the study area is about 6.50m with a
gradient of 1 in 8.
• King seam was developed in the Top Section upto 116 Level, with
Sandstone as immediate roof.
• Since there is a problem with sever seepage of water along sandstone
roof , an attempt was made to leave about 3.50m seam portion in the roof.
• In the changed working section, another problem of severe roof
failures in Level galleries cropped out.
1. PROBLEMS IN KING SEAM
2. STRESS MAPPING IN QUEEN SEAM
With a similar problem in overlying Queen Seam workings that is beyond 110
Level at a depth of 350m, Stress mapping was carried out, during June
2004. The inferences of those studies were-
The Major Principal Stress axis inferred from most prominent
Joint set (J1) is perpendicular to Level galleries are contributing
for instability of level galleries.
Minor Principal Stress axis inferred from least prominent Joint
set (J3) is parallel to level galleries.
Conversely, Dip galleries are stable as they are almost (with
about 5 degrees) parallel to the Major Principal Stress axis.
Further, these findings were closely matching with that of
Stress Orientation established earlier in the Queen Seam of
adjacent VK-7 Shaft through similar Stress Mapping technique.
CONTOUR DIAGRAM OF JOINTS PLOTTED ON
EQUAL AREA PROJECTION,LOWER HEMISPHERE,
QUEEN SEAM (100 JOINT POLES)
DIRECTION OF STRAIN ELLIPSOID
DEVELOPED IN QUEEN SEAM
3. STRESS MAPPING IN KING SEAM
1. Stress mapping is carried out in the present study area in King Seam.
2. The workings crossed 400 m. depth line and approaching the F16 Fault
(throw 20m) in the dip side property.
3. The details of structural features mapped are as follows -
SL.NO STRUCTURAL FEATURE NO.OF READINGS. MEAN TREND
1 FACE CLEAT
140
N550E
2 BUTT CLEAT N350W
3 MOST PROMINENT SLIPS
40
N450 E
4 LEAST PROMINENT SLIPS N650E
5 MOST PROMINENT JOINTS
27
N550E
6 LEAST PROMINENT JOINTS N650E
3. STRESS MAPPING IN KING SEAM
Contd…
4. The causative factors of unstable roof conditions are due to :
• The most prominent Slips S1 aligned to the greatest principal
stress direction (N450E) is responsible for the roof instability
confined to level galleries.
• Roof strata consists of thin layers and leading to failure in level
galleries with an indication of "Gutter roof". Trend of the "Gutter
roof" ,largely helped to confirm the orientation of principal stress in
the study area.
• As workings are enveloped by Faults, sympathetic slips developed
and contributed for unstable roof conditions.
• These findings are closely matching with that of Stress Orientation
established in the overlying Queen Seam.
FACE AND BUTT CLEAT
SLIP IN THE PILLAR SHOWING
DISPLACEMENT OF BANDS
J1 JOINT EXPOSED IN THE FLOOR
4. ROCK MASS RATING (RMR)
RMR classified the roof of working section of King Seam (Bottom
Section) as "FAIR“ with a rating of 41, where 40 is border of “Poor”
and “Fair” rock.
“ROOF GUTTERING” IN THE CENTER OF LEVEL GALLERY BEFORE
RE-ORIENTATION
5. NUMERICAL MODELLING BY CIMFR
Numerical modelling was taken up by CIMFR and the following conclusions
and recommendations are made:
1. The magnitude of major and minor in situ horizontal stresses in King
seam in the study area are found to be 7.15 Mpa and 3.68 Mpa
respectively.
2. The direction of the major in situ horizontal stress is found to be along
N 450 E , which is almost perpendicular to the level galleries.
3. Keeping the above directions and magnitude of in situ horizontal
stresses in view, level gallery can be driven along N 850 E to
E 50 S (with a stress point of view).
6. ORIENTATION OF GALLERIES
REFERENCE TO PRINCIPAL STRESS
N
N7°E
N10°E
N24°E
N
55°
E
N 69° E
N
62° W
N
4
7°
W
F5
RE-ORIENTED-1DG
F18
F10
&
J1
&
FC
F9
F16
RE-ORIENTED-1.LG
S1
N
45°
E
N 65° E
S2 & J2
N
35°
W
BC
N 73° E
ORIGINAL DG
N24°W
ORIGINALLG
INDEX
N
45°
W
1
N5°WRE-ORIENTED-2DG
N85°E
RE-ORIENTED-2. LG
S1 MOST PROMINENT SLIP
J1 MOST PROMINENT JOINT
S2- NEXT PROMINENT SLIP
J2 NEXT PROMINENT JOINT
FC- FACE CLEAT
BC-BUTT CLEAT
1- MAJOR PRINCIPAL STRESS
3- MINOR PRINCIPAL STRESS RE-ORIENTED-1 DIP GALLERY
RE-ORIENTED-1.LEVEL GALLERY
ORIGINAL DIP GALLERY
ORIGINAL LEVEL GALLERY
RE-ORIENTED-2 DIP GALLERY
RE-ORIENTED-2. LAVEL GALLERY
EW
3
N/55
N/49
N/46
N/48
N/51
N/46A
N/50
N/29
1IN
5.19
TS
TO
KS
108L
96L
15D
11D
7D
4D
1D
85L
90L
533
.50
55
8.20
527.5
0
543.
45
55
2.06
54
9.5
5
569.3
0
569.
60
N/30
N/47
85L
82L
MID
MWD
88L
TO KS/TS
1 IN 10
LEVELDRIFT
LEVELDRIFT
LEVELDRIFT
1IN6
1IN10
1IN10
1IN10
1 IN 10
1 IN 10
1 IN 6.7
1IN10
2.4M
0.5M
3.2M
0.7M
0.3M
0.2M
1.2M
502.
87
0.8M
1.3M
23D
4M
3.8M
1.2M
25D
27D
30D
92L
578.4
7
F.K.S...... 447.69(5.20)
55
7.40
485
.36
535.98
56
5.5
0
20D
20D
22D
97L
95L
L.T.LINE
HAULER ROOM
SURFACE
150 HP
816.13
816.03
B.M...816.54 M
OFFICE
No 5B INCLINE
11D
7D
T O KS/TS
1 IN 10
TO KS/TS
1 IN 10
TO KS/TS
1 IN 10
1IN4
1IN5
MID
MWD
5B AIR SHAFT
110L
25D
23D
21D
20D
1IN5.19
TSTOKS
512.4
90
DIA: 6.5M
1.2M
3.2M
3
2A
2
33K.V.TR
ANSMISSIONLINE
60
m
B
ARRIE
R
60m
BAR RIER
60
m
BARR
IE
R
60mBAR
RIE
R
1 .20M
3.20M
501.5
95
0.60M
48
2.
49
487
.4
4
483.2
0
508
.0
8
495.5
3
49
4.
44
DEPTH :292M
PVK SHAFT
F1
0
F1
0
D/H
16D
12D
112L BELT LEVEL
48
7.
04
10D
9D
S/22
47
2.
29
0.4
0.250.35
0.1
0.2
2.0
0.1M
0.25M
47
1.7447
3.
08
8D
47
2.
64
80
0.34
803.06
805.16
810.05
T E L L A V A G U
807
.68 HFL
803.72
805.0
0
HFL
HF
LWITHINTH
ENALLAH
T E L L A V A G U
796.6
0
797.2
7
798.0
5
DIVERTED
6D
4D
2D
0R
115L
48
2.52
48
8.
07
47
9.
69
48
8.
28
49
2.64
46
4.
08
5
46
2.
94
46
2.
40
45
8.
77
50
0.
68
6
UG B.H.
TO K.S.
N82°W
N8°E
S5°E
S85°W
N
0 200
43D
45D
116CXCUT
412.53
3
41
9.19
3
404.65
3
40
0.38
8
39
8.57
3
41
5.898
533.339
536.670
539.870
543.450
546.280
543.53
537.45
540.57
530.879
534.18
537.37
540.52
534.00
530.83
528.26
5D
3D
552.03
555.10
551.65
550.44
548.34
546.03
549.12
542.67
544.78
546.92
554.30
540.62
538.53
535.85
532.0
548.42
544.86
42
2.05
42
6.84
42
0.55
41
3.39
415.19
40
9.25
404.69
42
6.55
JH
GH
GH
47D
49D
43
0.83
5
42
4.33
5
41
8.50
5
40
8.26
5
42
0.03
5
42
8.27
558.55
560.35
556.85
558.84
554.17
549.535
552.38
544.145
542.42
536.285
538.825
38D
521.984
12D
9D
517.534
519.614
510.674516.579
513.749
40
5.59
6
1.8m
526.869
524.914
518.859
42
4.11
403.15
6
41
0.266
533.339
523.924
524.984
7D
40D
38D
116BXCUT
GH
B. H. No..A/326
F.K.S...... 541.60(5.35)
DEPTH....310.00
28D
GH
GH
GH
506.53
504.38
488.75
473.67
51
2.
83
8
50
9.
58
8
51
3.
04
3
52
4.31
8
51
9.
08
8
52
2.63
51
1.
65
6
50
4.
93
6
502.09
505.899
497.899
494.804
483.759
BE
LT
RO
AD
434.
00
41
9.
61
396
.9
6
401.4
2
39
6.5
4
405
.7
2
39
4.0
39
4.36
39
1.43
48
9.
23
48
1.
04
49
0.5
9
46
6.
75
45
7.
26
45
4.61
47
5.
92
22D
3.5m
410
.4
1
41
8.3
3
393.3
4
39
5.
87
3.5m
4.5m
4.5m
49
4.8849
5.
53
24D
26D
23D
24D
26D
28D
30D
32D
34D
36D
GH
452.72
459.66
457.95
458.29
1.6
2
0.7
0.8 1.20.6
0.4
0.8
0.7
0.6
2
2
UG B.H.
TO K.S.
50
1.
32
49
4.
99
471.03
469.04
467.46
452.21
107L
48
8.4
1
0.8
0.8
0.7
0.7
441
.9
7
435
.9
4431
.6
9
424
.8
0
42
0.2
3
JHw
96L
0.6
0.4
B. H. No..A/324
S.L.... .....802.21
DEPTH....365.00
DIA.. ......10CM
F.K.S...... 444.71(7.70)
484.50
478.48
487.26
461.73
460.4
1
458.0
5449
.4
7
506
.5
3
49
4.
66
6.5m
PANEL No.S-21
1.4m
1.4m
0.5m
0.5m
0.2M
0.3M
0.3M
0.45M
12D
16DN
18D
20D
119L
15D
16DS
BELT LEVEL
BELT
DIP
BELTDIP
407.2
9
436
.2
8
40
3.95
40
8.18
41
5.50
41
2.01
1m
120L
120L
120L
22D
GH
GH
GH
GH
GH
GH
HAULAGE
DIP
HAULA
GE
DIP
39
4.59
39
9.34
40
4.46
39
7.7 39
7.69
403.4
8
404.5
1
41
3.
67
425
.0
943
1.
97
43
7.
97
447.4
8
400
.5
403.5
3
400.
92
122L
GH
GH
122L
16BD
1.6m
2m
1.6m
16DN
16AD
18D
19D
94L
91L
5D
3D
1D
MID
122L
123L
39
7.36
39
5.55
39
2.38
40
0.
47
403.7
9
410.5
1
1m
1m
1.6m
D/H
E/H
D/H
13D
EH
END LESS HAULAGE
END LESS HAULAGE
J/H
123L
392.62
2.5m
39
4.1
8
400.4
7
395.6
8
408.5
1
410
.2
3
417
.7
1423.
33
428
.3
5
47
4.
68
47
8.
52
46
3.10
463
.35
44
9.23
43
9.2
0
527.
47
474
.7
6
465
.3
7
3
2A
2
3
2A
2
B.H. No..A/342
FKS-382.10
BOUNDARY
3
2A
2
FKS-....429.39
B.H. No..A/306
P BORE HOLE
DEPTH....240
DIA........10CM
B.H. No. .A/320
DEPTH....310.00
F.K.S......516.23(5.35)
B. H. No..A/323
DEPTH.. ..367. 00
F .K.S......449.25(6.80)
B.H. No..A/286
DEPTH..365.93
F.K.S.... 448.68(6.86)
B.H. No.. A/285
DEPTH....407.55
F.K.S...... 403.80(5.45)
B.H. No..KSB-7
DEPTH....431.92
F.K.S......409.61(6. 05)
B.H. No.. A/311A
DEPTH....375.00
B.H. No.. A/316
DEPTH....435.00
F.K.S......383.44(5.60)
B.H
. No..A/11
5
DEPTH
....396.2
4
F.K
.S......52
0.6
5(5
.37
)
B.H. No. .KSB-5
DEPTH....339.38
B.H. No.. A/119
DEPTH....262.1
B.H. No..KSB-14
S.L.... .....804.07
DEPTH....153M
DIA.. ......10CM
B.H. No..A/319
DEPTH....236
B.H. No..A/338
DEPTH....216.50
B.H. No..A/337
DEPTH....216.50
B.H. No..A/336
DEPTH.... 213.00
B.H. No.. A174
B.H. No.. A178
B.H. No.. A175
DEPTH....159.50
B.H. No.. A157
DEPTH....161.85
DIA...... .....15CM
DEPTH....115.06
NO 1 ... 727.44 (19.58)
S.L........ ....798.84
DIA...........15CM
DEPTH....65.68
NO 1SEAM ...780.210 (13.72)
S.L.. ..........803.070
B.H. No. . A183
DEPTH....56.80
B.H. No.. A118
DEPTH.... 169.840
B.H. No.. A185
DEPTH....53.03
B.H. No.. A/313
DEPTH.... 420.00
F.K.S......391.85(5.90)
B.H. No..A/350 (MPBX)
DEPTH....285.00
B.H. No..A/340
46
2.
39
44
7.36
439
.5
7
442.98
454
.2
6
52
5.5
5
430
.9
44
44
1.1
2
42
9.12
43
4.18
3
44
7.
97
45
3.64
3M
2M
0.8
M
115L
117L
115L
117L
41
9.07
417.23
42
2.
71
426.2
3
454
.9
2
443
.6
0
434
.6
8
41
6.
36
119L
417.2
3
412
.2
5
1.4m
1.2m0.4M
0.4 1m
1.4m
1.4m 0.5m
0.65m
0.6m
0.8m
562.13
563.38
559.72
539.48
541.26
563.658
561.313
565.412
567.242
567.102
562.972
558.625
554.563
549.663
547.228
550.298
555.503
570.537
566.498
545.818
113L
42
3.03
1
43
1.35
1
42
7.74
6
421.03
6
42
4.486
41
6.91141
9.021
PANEL STD. ON 20-05-11
STABLE ROOF IN THE LEVEL GALLERY AFTER RE ORIENTATION
7. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS
1. PHYSICAL MAPPING LARGELY HELPED TO DERIVE STRESS
ORIENTATION IN THE STUDY AREA TO BE N450E.
2. THE DATA IS VALIDATED WITH THAT OF OVERLYING QUEEN
SEAM AS WELL AS ADJACENT BLOCK i.e. VK-7 SHAFT.
3. FURTHER IT IS VALIDATED WITH NUMERICAL MODELLING DATA.
4. FINDINGS OF ALL THE ABOVE STUDIES ARE IN GOOD
AGREEMENT WITH EACH OTHER.
5. BASED ON THE RECOMMANDATIONS (to drive Level Galleries in
N850E) OF ABOVE STUDIES, STABLE ROOF CONDITIONS COULD
BE ESTABLISHED.
******
PVK 17062011

More Related Content

What's hot

Lecture 11 s.s.iii Design of Steel Structures - Faculty of Civil Engineering ...
Lecture 11 s.s.iii Design of Steel Structures - Faculty of Civil Engineering ...Lecture 11 s.s.iii Design of Steel Structures - Faculty of Civil Engineering ...
Lecture 11 s.s.iii Design of Steel Structures - Faculty of Civil Engineering ...Ursachi Răzvan
 
Masonry Retrofit
Masonry RetrofitMasonry Retrofit
Masonry RetrofitTeja Ande
 
Lecture 2 s. s. iii Design of Steel Structures - Faculty of Civil Engineering...
Lecture 2 s. s. iii Design of Steel Structures - Faculty of Civil Engineering...Lecture 2 s. s. iii Design of Steel Structures - Faculty of Civil Engineering...
Lecture 2 s. s. iii Design of Steel Structures - Faculty of Civil Engineering...Ursachi Răzvan
 
Seismic Analysis
Seismic AnalysisSeismic Analysis
Seismic AnalysisKrishnagnr
 
Earthquake resistant design of structures
Earthquake resistant design of structuresEarthquake resistant design of structures
Earthquake resistant design of structuresrvrizul
 
Dynamics analysis of structures subjected to earthquake load 53037
Dynamics analysis of structures subjected to earthquake load 53037Dynamics analysis of structures subjected to earthquake load 53037
Dynamics analysis of structures subjected to earthquake load 53037EditorIJAERD
 
SEISMIC EVALUATION
SEISMIC EVALUATIONSEISMIC EVALUATION
SEISMIC EVALUATIONJKIB93
 
Evaluation of slope stability for waste rock dumps in a mine
Evaluation of slope stability for waste rock dumps in a mineEvaluation of slope stability for waste rock dumps in a mine
Evaluation of slope stability for waste rock dumps in a mineSafdar Ali
 
EFFECT OF POSITIONING OF RC SHEAR WALLS OF DIFFERENT SHAPES ON SEISMIC PERFOR...
EFFECT OF POSITIONING OF RC SHEAR WALLS OF DIFFERENT SHAPES ON SEISMIC PERFOR...EFFECT OF POSITIONING OF RC SHEAR WALLS OF DIFFERENT SHAPES ON SEISMIC PERFOR...
EFFECT OF POSITIONING OF RC SHEAR WALLS OF DIFFERENT SHAPES ON SEISMIC PERFOR...IAEME Publication
 
Gabion walls design guide
Gabion walls design guideGabion walls design guide
Gabion walls design guideScottMeredith1
 
Monitering and safety aspects in underground structures
Monitering  and  safety aspects  in underground structuresMonitering  and  safety aspects  in underground structures
Monitering and safety aspects in underground structuresSourabh Jain
 
Seismic Design of Buried Structures in PH and NZ
Seismic Design of Buried Structures in PH and NZSeismic Design of Buried Structures in PH and NZ
Seismic Design of Buried Structures in PH and NZLawrence Galvez
 
Lecture 1 s.s.iii Design of Steel Structures - Faculty of Civil Engineering Iaşi
Lecture 1 s.s.iii Design of Steel Structures - Faculty of Civil Engineering IaşiLecture 1 s.s.iii Design of Steel Structures - Faculty of Civil Engineering Iaşi
Lecture 1 s.s.iii Design of Steel Structures - Faculty of Civil Engineering IaşiUrsachi Răzvan
 
An Overview of Analysis and Design of a Single-Layer Reticulated Inverted Mon...
An Overview of Analysis and Design of a Single-Layer Reticulated Inverted Mon...An Overview of Analysis and Design of a Single-Layer Reticulated Inverted Mon...
An Overview of Analysis and Design of a Single-Layer Reticulated Inverted Mon...AIT Solutions
 

What's hot (20)

seismic ubc -97
seismic ubc -97seismic ubc -97
seismic ubc -97
 
Lecture 11 s.s.iii Design of Steel Structures - Faculty of Civil Engineering ...
Lecture 11 s.s.iii Design of Steel Structures - Faculty of Civil Engineering ...Lecture 11 s.s.iii Design of Steel Structures - Faculty of Civil Engineering ...
Lecture 11 s.s.iii Design of Steel Structures - Faculty of Civil Engineering ...
 
Masonry Retrofit
Masonry RetrofitMasonry Retrofit
Masonry Retrofit
 
Team 19
Team 19Team 19
Team 19
 
Lecture 2 s. s. iii Design of Steel Structures - Faculty of Civil Engineering...
Lecture 2 s. s. iii Design of Steel Structures - Faculty of Civil Engineering...Lecture 2 s. s. iii Design of Steel Structures - Faculty of Civil Engineering...
Lecture 2 s. s. iii Design of Steel Structures - Faculty of Civil Engineering...
 
Dynamics Project
Dynamics ProjectDynamics Project
Dynamics Project
 
Seismic Analysis
Seismic AnalysisSeismic Analysis
Seismic Analysis
 
Earthquake damages
Earthquake damagesEarthquake damages
Earthquake damages
 
strata monitoring Instrumentation
strata monitoring Instrumentationstrata monitoring Instrumentation
strata monitoring Instrumentation
 
Shear wall
Shear wallShear wall
Shear wall
 
Earthquake resistant design of structures
Earthquake resistant design of structuresEarthquake resistant design of structures
Earthquake resistant design of structures
 
Dynamics analysis of structures subjected to earthquake load 53037
Dynamics analysis of structures subjected to earthquake load 53037Dynamics analysis of structures subjected to earthquake load 53037
Dynamics analysis of structures subjected to earthquake load 53037
 
SEISMIC EVALUATION
SEISMIC EVALUATIONSEISMIC EVALUATION
SEISMIC EVALUATION
 
Evaluation of slope stability for waste rock dumps in a mine
Evaluation of slope stability for waste rock dumps in a mineEvaluation of slope stability for waste rock dumps in a mine
Evaluation of slope stability for waste rock dumps in a mine
 
EFFECT OF POSITIONING OF RC SHEAR WALLS OF DIFFERENT SHAPES ON SEISMIC PERFOR...
EFFECT OF POSITIONING OF RC SHEAR WALLS OF DIFFERENT SHAPES ON SEISMIC PERFOR...EFFECT OF POSITIONING OF RC SHEAR WALLS OF DIFFERENT SHAPES ON SEISMIC PERFOR...
EFFECT OF POSITIONING OF RC SHEAR WALLS OF DIFFERENT SHAPES ON SEISMIC PERFOR...
 
Gabion walls design guide
Gabion walls design guideGabion walls design guide
Gabion walls design guide
 
Monitering and safety aspects in underground structures
Monitering  and  safety aspects  in underground structuresMonitering  and  safety aspects  in underground structures
Monitering and safety aspects in underground structures
 
Seismic Design of Buried Structures in PH and NZ
Seismic Design of Buried Structures in PH and NZSeismic Design of Buried Structures in PH and NZ
Seismic Design of Buried Structures in PH and NZ
 
Lecture 1 s.s.iii Design of Steel Structures - Faculty of Civil Engineering Iaşi
Lecture 1 s.s.iii Design of Steel Structures - Faculty of Civil Engineering IaşiLecture 1 s.s.iii Design of Steel Structures - Faculty of Civil Engineering Iaşi
Lecture 1 s.s.iii Design of Steel Structures - Faculty of Civil Engineering Iaşi
 
An Overview of Analysis and Design of a Single-Layer Reticulated Inverted Mon...
An Overview of Analysis and Design of a Single-Layer Reticulated Inverted Mon...An Overview of Analysis and Design of a Single-Layer Reticulated Inverted Mon...
An Overview of Analysis and Design of a Single-Layer Reticulated Inverted Mon...
 

Viewers also liked

Millward Brown AdReaction Multiscreen 2014 Infographic
Millward Brown AdReaction Multiscreen 2014 InfographicMillward Brown AdReaction Multiscreen 2014 Infographic
Millward Brown AdReaction Multiscreen 2014 InfographicKantar
 
Writing for academic publishing Griffith College, Dublin
Writing for academic publishing Griffith College, DublinWriting for academic publishing Griffith College, Dublin
Writing for academic publishing Griffith College, DublinHelen Fallon
 
Proficiency 4 astronomy science
Proficiency 4 astronomy scienceProficiency 4 astronomy science
Proficiency 4 astronomy sciencebrotjes15
 
Teknologi kumpulan (2) imtiaz
Teknologi kumpulan (2) imtiazTeknologi kumpulan (2) imtiaz
Teknologi kumpulan (2) imtiazHaniza Baharudin
 
De paranoïde samenleving
De paranoïde samenlevingDe paranoïde samenleving
De paranoïde samenlevingMaarten Koller
 
Lecture 5 handout
Lecture 5 handoutLecture 5 handout
Lecture 5 handoutGale Pooley
 
2012年11月17日 Web&オープンガバメントサミットin鯖江 発表資料
2012年11月17日 Web&オープンガバメントサミットin鯖江 発表資料2012年11月17日 Web&オープンガバメントサミットin鯖江 発表資料
2012年11月17日 Web&オープンガバメントサミットin鯖江 発表資料Rikkyo University
 
Wassup! July 2011 issue - the Cultural Trends magazine
Wassup! July 2011 issue - the Cultural Trends magazine Wassup! July 2011 issue - the Cultural Trends magazine
Wassup! July 2011 issue - the Cultural Trends magazine Ogilvy & Mather Asia Pacific
 
2011彩票首页开发实践
2011彩票首页开发实践2011彩票首页开发实践
2011彩票首页开发实践zhenn yang
 
NPO法人学生ネットワークWAN事業計画
NPO法人学生ネットワークWAN事業計画NPO法人学生ネットワークWAN事業計画
NPO法人学生ネットワークWAN事業計画Yuichi Morito
 
Brand Ministry - Cas Client Mercialys
Brand Ministry - Cas Client MercialysBrand Ministry - Cas Client Mercialys
Brand Ministry - Cas Client MercialysBrand Ministry
 

Viewers also liked (20)

Millward Brown AdReaction Multiscreen 2014 Infographic
Millward Brown AdReaction Multiscreen 2014 InfographicMillward Brown AdReaction Multiscreen 2014 Infographic
Millward Brown AdReaction Multiscreen 2014 Infographic
 
Writing for academic publishing Griffith College, Dublin
Writing for academic publishing Griffith College, DublinWriting for academic publishing Griffith College, Dublin
Writing for academic publishing Griffith College, Dublin
 
Hot chocolate
Hot chocolateHot chocolate
Hot chocolate
 
Neek To Chic
Neek To ChicNeek To Chic
Neek To Chic
 
Proficiency 4 astronomy science
Proficiency 4 astronomy scienceProficiency 4 astronomy science
Proficiency 4 astronomy science
 
Unit 6
Unit 6 Unit 6
Unit 6
 
Teknologi kumpulan (2) imtiaz
Teknologi kumpulan (2) imtiazTeknologi kumpulan (2) imtiaz
Teknologi kumpulan (2) imtiaz
 
De paranoïde samenleving
De paranoïde samenlevingDe paranoïde samenleving
De paranoïde samenleving
 
Lecture 5 handout
Lecture 5 handoutLecture 5 handout
Lecture 5 handout
 
Pizza tax
Pizza taxPizza tax
Pizza tax
 
2012年11月17日 Web&オープンガバメントサミットin鯖江 発表資料
2012年11月17日 Web&オープンガバメントサミットin鯖江 発表資料2012年11月17日 Web&オープンガバメントサミットin鯖江 発表資料
2012年11月17日 Web&オープンガバメントサミットin鯖江 発表資料
 
Wassup! July 2011 issue - the Cultural Trends magazine
Wassup! July 2011 issue - the Cultural Trends magazine Wassup! July 2011 issue - the Cultural Trends magazine
Wassup! July 2011 issue - the Cultural Trends magazine
 
Pistas !
Pistas !Pistas !
Pistas !
 
Excel budget
Excel budgetExcel budget
Excel budget
 
2011彩票首页开发实践
2011彩票首页开发实践2011彩票首页开发实践
2011彩票首页开发实践
 
NPO法人学生ネットワークWAN事業計画
NPO法人学生ネットワークWAN事業計画NPO法人学生ネットワークWAN事業計画
NPO法人学生ネットワークWAN事業計画
 
Mexotel
MexotelMexotel
Mexotel
 
Pornografia vegetal
Pornografia vegetalPornografia vegetal
Pornografia vegetal
 
Brand Ministry - Cas Client Mercialys
Brand Ministry - Cas Client MercialysBrand Ministry - Cas Client Mercialys
Brand Ministry - Cas Client Mercialys
 
Últimas tecnologias
Últimas tecnologiasÚltimas tecnologias
Últimas tecnologias
 

Similar to PVK 17062011

goaves effect on subsidence
goaves effect on subsidencegoaves effect on subsidence
goaves effect on subsidenceVR M
 
sd project report Final.pdf
sd project report Final.pdfsd project report Final.pdf
sd project report Final.pdfSafalsha Babu
 
Fault zone detection using Electrical prospecting (Resistivity Method)
Fault zone detection using Electrical prospecting (Resistivity Method)Fault zone detection using Electrical prospecting (Resistivity Method)
Fault zone detection using Electrical prospecting (Resistivity Method)Adithya Shettar
 
Stress Shadows: How and Why They Can Affect Hydraulic Fracturing in Both Conv...
Stress Shadows: How and Why They Can Affect Hydraulic Fracturing in Both Conv...Stress Shadows: How and Why They Can Affect Hydraulic Fracturing in Both Conv...
Stress Shadows: How and Why They Can Affect Hydraulic Fracturing in Both Conv...Society of Petroleum Engineers
 
Response of structures to earthquake - Structural dynamics and Earthquake Eng...
Response of structures to earthquake - Structural dynamics and Earthquake Eng...Response of structures to earthquake - Structural dynamics and Earthquake Eng...
Response of structures to earthquake - Structural dynamics and Earthquake Eng...Shanmugasundaram N
 
Parte 1 acero segundo parcial
Parte 1 acero segundo parcialParte 1 acero segundo parcial
Parte 1 acero segundo parcialJosEspinoza64
 
Stress Shadows: How and Why They Can Affect Hydraulic Fracturing in Both Conv...
Stress Shadows: How and Why They Can Affect Hydraulic Fracturing in Both Conv...Stress Shadows: How and Why They Can Affect Hydraulic Fracturing in Both Conv...
Stress Shadows: How and Why They Can Affect Hydraulic Fracturing in Both Conv...Society of Petroleum Engineers
 
Arch.CE Portfolio
Arch.CE PortfolioArch.CE Portfolio
Arch.CE PortfolioAngela Su
 
Seismic Design Of Structures Project
Seismic Design Of Structures ProjectSeismic Design Of Structures Project
Seismic Design Of Structures ProjectGunjan Shetye
 
10570216.ppt
10570216.ppt10570216.ppt
10570216.pptpisal3
 
Fault'classification of fault and mechanism of faulting
Fault'classification of fault  and mechanism of faultingFault'classification of fault  and mechanism of faulting
Fault'classification of fault and mechanism of faultingShivam Jain
 
IRJET- Analysis of Steel Silos Subjected to Wind Load with Various Slendernes...
IRJET- Analysis of Steel Silos Subjected to Wind Load with Various Slendernes...IRJET- Analysis of Steel Silos Subjected to Wind Load with Various Slendernes...
IRJET- Analysis of Steel Silos Subjected to Wind Load with Various Slendernes...IRJET Journal
 
Lecture24
Lecture24Lecture24
Lecture24shita43
 
Geo-Tech Studies for Longwall
Geo-Tech Studies for LongwallGeo-Tech Studies for Longwall
Geo-Tech Studies for LongwallVR M
 
Material (Failure Diagnosis)
Material (Failure Diagnosis)Material (Failure Diagnosis)
Material (Failure Diagnosis)Ahmed Ehab
 
Comparative Study on Regular and Irregular RC Structures Under Far and Near F...
Comparative Study on Regular and Irregular RC Structures Under Far and Near F...Comparative Study on Regular and Irregular RC Structures Under Far and Near F...
Comparative Study on Regular and Irregular RC Structures Under Far and Near F...IRJET Journal
 

Similar to PVK 17062011 (20)

goaves effect on subsidence
goaves effect on subsidencegoaves effect on subsidence
goaves effect on subsidence
 
Intze PPT
Intze PPTIntze PPT
Intze PPT
 
sd project report Final.pdf
sd project report Final.pdfsd project report Final.pdf
sd project report Final.pdf
 
Fault zone detection using Electrical prospecting (Resistivity Method)
Fault zone detection using Electrical prospecting (Resistivity Method)Fault zone detection using Electrical prospecting (Resistivity Method)
Fault zone detection using Electrical prospecting (Resistivity Method)
 
Circular failure
Circular failureCircular failure
Circular failure
 
Intze ppt
Intze pptIntze ppt
Intze ppt
 
ALBAÑIRERIA CONFINADA
ALBAÑIRERIA CONFINADAALBAÑIRERIA CONFINADA
ALBAÑIRERIA CONFINADA
 
Stress Shadows: How and Why They Can Affect Hydraulic Fracturing in Both Conv...
Stress Shadows: How and Why They Can Affect Hydraulic Fracturing in Both Conv...Stress Shadows: How and Why They Can Affect Hydraulic Fracturing in Both Conv...
Stress Shadows: How and Why They Can Affect Hydraulic Fracturing in Both Conv...
 
Response of structures to earthquake - Structural dynamics and Earthquake Eng...
Response of structures to earthquake - Structural dynamics and Earthquake Eng...Response of structures to earthquake - Structural dynamics and Earthquake Eng...
Response of structures to earthquake - Structural dynamics and Earthquake Eng...
 
Parte 1 acero segundo parcial
Parte 1 acero segundo parcialParte 1 acero segundo parcial
Parte 1 acero segundo parcial
 
Stress Shadows: How and Why They Can Affect Hydraulic Fracturing in Both Conv...
Stress Shadows: How and Why They Can Affect Hydraulic Fracturing in Both Conv...Stress Shadows: How and Why They Can Affect Hydraulic Fracturing in Both Conv...
Stress Shadows: How and Why They Can Affect Hydraulic Fracturing in Both Conv...
 
Arch.CE Portfolio
Arch.CE PortfolioArch.CE Portfolio
Arch.CE Portfolio
 
Seismic Design Of Structures Project
Seismic Design Of Structures ProjectSeismic Design Of Structures Project
Seismic Design Of Structures Project
 
10570216.ppt
10570216.ppt10570216.ppt
10570216.ppt
 
Fault'classification of fault and mechanism of faulting
Fault'classification of fault  and mechanism of faultingFault'classification of fault  and mechanism of faulting
Fault'classification of fault and mechanism of faulting
 
IRJET- Analysis of Steel Silos Subjected to Wind Load with Various Slendernes...
IRJET- Analysis of Steel Silos Subjected to Wind Load with Various Slendernes...IRJET- Analysis of Steel Silos Subjected to Wind Load with Various Slendernes...
IRJET- Analysis of Steel Silos Subjected to Wind Load with Various Slendernes...
 
Lecture24
Lecture24Lecture24
Lecture24
 
Geo-Tech Studies for Longwall
Geo-Tech Studies for LongwallGeo-Tech Studies for Longwall
Geo-Tech Studies for Longwall
 
Material (Failure Diagnosis)
Material (Failure Diagnosis)Material (Failure Diagnosis)
Material (Failure Diagnosis)
 
Comparative Study on Regular and Irregular RC Structures Under Far and Near F...
Comparative Study on Regular and Irregular RC Structures Under Far and Near F...Comparative Study on Regular and Irregular RC Structures Under Far and Near F...
Comparative Study on Regular and Irregular RC Structures Under Far and Near F...
 

More from Narasimha Sharma

More from Narasimha Sharma (7)

Lr from TATA Steel
Lr from TATA SteelLr from TATA Steel
Lr from TATA Steel
 
TATA STEEL FEED BACK
TATA STEEL FEED BACKTATA STEEL FEED BACK
TATA STEEL FEED BACK
 
Tata steel feed back
Tata steel feed backTata steel feed back
Tata steel feed back
 
Tata steel feed back
Tata steel feed backTata steel feed back
Tata steel feed back
 
Invitatation_GeoEngineerig studies
Invitatation_GeoEngineerig studiesInvitatation_GeoEngineerig studies
Invitatation_GeoEngineerig studies
 
FINAL COMPENDIUM.compressed (2)
FINAL COMPENDIUM.compressed (2)FINAL COMPENDIUM.compressed (2)
FINAL COMPENDIUM.compressed (2)
 
Dr.Deepak Reference
Dr.Deepak ReferenceDr.Deepak Reference
Dr.Deepak Reference
 

PVK 17062011

  • 1. STRESS MAPPING FOR RE- ORIENTATION OF GALLERIES IN PVK-5 Incl. Dr.D.N.SHARMA Dy.General Manager(Geo) Exploration Division / RG1 • In PVK mine, King Seam workings reached 400m depth. • Thickness of the King Seam in the study area is about 6.50m with a gradient of 1 in 8. • King seam was developed in the Top Section upto 116 Level, with Sandstone as immediate roof. • Since there is a problem with sever seepage of water along sandstone roof , an attempt was made to leave about 3.50m seam portion in the roof. • In the changed working section, another problem of severe roof failures in Level galleries cropped out. 1. PROBLEMS IN KING SEAM
  • 2. 2. STRESS MAPPING IN QUEEN SEAM With a similar problem in overlying Queen Seam workings that is beyond 110 Level at a depth of 350m, Stress mapping was carried out, during June 2004. The inferences of those studies were- The Major Principal Stress axis inferred from most prominent Joint set (J1) is perpendicular to Level galleries are contributing for instability of level galleries. Minor Principal Stress axis inferred from least prominent Joint set (J3) is parallel to level galleries. Conversely, Dip galleries are stable as they are almost (with about 5 degrees) parallel to the Major Principal Stress axis. Further, these findings were closely matching with that of Stress Orientation established earlier in the Queen Seam of adjacent VK-7 Shaft through similar Stress Mapping technique.
  • 3. CONTOUR DIAGRAM OF JOINTS PLOTTED ON EQUAL AREA PROJECTION,LOWER HEMISPHERE, QUEEN SEAM (100 JOINT POLES) DIRECTION OF STRAIN ELLIPSOID DEVELOPED IN QUEEN SEAM
  • 4. 3. STRESS MAPPING IN KING SEAM 1. Stress mapping is carried out in the present study area in King Seam. 2. The workings crossed 400 m. depth line and approaching the F16 Fault (throw 20m) in the dip side property. 3. The details of structural features mapped are as follows - SL.NO STRUCTURAL FEATURE NO.OF READINGS. MEAN TREND 1 FACE CLEAT 140 N550E 2 BUTT CLEAT N350W 3 MOST PROMINENT SLIPS 40 N450 E 4 LEAST PROMINENT SLIPS N650E 5 MOST PROMINENT JOINTS 27 N550E 6 LEAST PROMINENT JOINTS N650E 3. STRESS MAPPING IN KING SEAM Contd… 4. The causative factors of unstable roof conditions are due to : • The most prominent Slips S1 aligned to the greatest principal stress direction (N450E) is responsible for the roof instability confined to level galleries. • Roof strata consists of thin layers and leading to failure in level galleries with an indication of "Gutter roof". Trend of the "Gutter roof" ,largely helped to confirm the orientation of principal stress in the study area. • As workings are enveloped by Faults, sympathetic slips developed and contributed for unstable roof conditions. • These findings are closely matching with that of Stress Orientation established in the overlying Queen Seam.
  • 6. SLIP IN THE PILLAR SHOWING DISPLACEMENT OF BANDS J1 JOINT EXPOSED IN THE FLOOR
  • 7. 4. ROCK MASS RATING (RMR) RMR classified the roof of working section of King Seam (Bottom Section) as "FAIR“ with a rating of 41, where 40 is border of “Poor” and “Fair” rock.
  • 8. “ROOF GUTTERING” IN THE CENTER OF LEVEL GALLERY BEFORE RE-ORIENTATION 5. NUMERICAL MODELLING BY CIMFR Numerical modelling was taken up by CIMFR and the following conclusions and recommendations are made: 1. The magnitude of major and minor in situ horizontal stresses in King seam in the study area are found to be 7.15 Mpa and 3.68 Mpa respectively. 2. The direction of the major in situ horizontal stress is found to be along N 450 E , which is almost perpendicular to the level galleries. 3. Keeping the above directions and magnitude of in situ horizontal stresses in view, level gallery can be driven along N 850 E to E 50 S (with a stress point of view).
  • 9. 6. ORIENTATION OF GALLERIES REFERENCE TO PRINCIPAL STRESS N N7°E N10°E N24°E N 55° E N 69° E N 62° W N 4 7° W F5 RE-ORIENTED-1DG F18 F10 & J1 & FC F9 F16 RE-ORIENTED-1.LG S1 N 45° E N 65° E S2 & J2 N 35° W BC N 73° E ORIGINAL DG N24°W ORIGINALLG INDEX N 45° W 1 N5°WRE-ORIENTED-2DG N85°E RE-ORIENTED-2. LG S1 MOST PROMINENT SLIP J1 MOST PROMINENT JOINT S2- NEXT PROMINENT SLIP J2 NEXT PROMINENT JOINT FC- FACE CLEAT BC-BUTT CLEAT 1- MAJOR PRINCIPAL STRESS 3- MINOR PRINCIPAL STRESS RE-ORIENTED-1 DIP GALLERY RE-ORIENTED-1.LEVEL GALLERY ORIGINAL DIP GALLERY ORIGINAL LEVEL GALLERY RE-ORIENTED-2 DIP GALLERY RE-ORIENTED-2. LAVEL GALLERY EW 3 N/55 N/49 N/46 N/48 N/51 N/46A N/50 N/29 1IN 5.19 TS TO KS 108L 96L 15D 11D 7D 4D 1D 85L 90L 533 .50 55 8.20 527.5 0 543. 45 55 2.06 54 9.5 5 569.3 0 569. 60 N/30 N/47 85L 82L MID MWD 88L TO KS/TS 1 IN 10 LEVELDRIFT LEVELDRIFT LEVELDRIFT 1IN6 1IN10 1IN10 1IN10 1 IN 10 1 IN 10 1 IN 6.7 1IN10 2.4M 0.5M 3.2M 0.7M 0.3M 0.2M 1.2M 502. 87 0.8M 1.3M 23D 4M 3.8M 1.2M 25D 27D 30D 92L 578.4 7 F.K.S...... 447.69(5.20) 55 7.40 485 .36 535.98 56 5.5 0 20D 20D 22D 97L 95L L.T.LINE HAULER ROOM SURFACE 150 HP 816.13 816.03 B.M...816.54 M OFFICE No 5B INCLINE 11D 7D T O KS/TS 1 IN 10 TO KS/TS 1 IN 10 TO KS/TS 1 IN 10 1IN4 1IN5 MID MWD 5B AIR SHAFT 110L 25D 23D 21D 20D 1IN5.19 TSTOKS 512.4 90 DIA: 6.5M 1.2M 3.2M 3 2A 2 33K.V.TR ANSMISSIONLINE 60 m B ARRIE R 60m BAR RIER 60 m BARR IE R 60mBAR RIE R 1 .20M 3.20M 501.5 95 0.60M 48 2. 49 487 .4 4 483.2 0 508 .0 8 495.5 3 49 4. 44 DEPTH :292M PVK SHAFT F1 0 F1 0 D/H 16D 12D 112L BELT LEVEL 48 7. 04 10D 9D S/22 47 2. 29 0.4 0.250.35 0.1 0.2 2.0 0.1M 0.25M 47 1.7447 3. 08 8D 47 2. 64 80 0.34 803.06 805.16 810.05 T E L L A V A G U 807 .68 HFL 803.72 805.0 0 HFL HF LWITHINTH ENALLAH T E L L A V A G U 796.6 0 797.2 7 798.0 5 DIVERTED 6D 4D 2D 0R 115L 48 2.52 48 8. 07 47 9. 69 48 8. 28 49 2.64 46 4. 08 5 46 2. 94 46 2. 40 45 8. 77 50 0. 68 6 UG B.H. TO K.S. N82°W N8°E S5°E S85°W N 0 200 43D 45D 116CXCUT 412.53 3 41 9.19 3 404.65 3 40 0.38 8 39 8.57 3 41 5.898 533.339 536.670 539.870 543.450 546.280 543.53 537.45 540.57 530.879 534.18 537.37 540.52 534.00 530.83 528.26 5D 3D 552.03 555.10 551.65 550.44 548.34 546.03 549.12 542.67 544.78 546.92 554.30 540.62 538.53 535.85 532.0 548.42 544.86 42 2.05 42 6.84 42 0.55 41 3.39 415.19 40 9.25 404.69 42 6.55 JH GH GH 47D 49D 43 0.83 5 42 4.33 5 41 8.50 5 40 8.26 5 42 0.03 5 42 8.27 558.55 560.35 556.85 558.84 554.17 549.535 552.38 544.145 542.42 536.285 538.825 38D 521.984 12D 9D 517.534 519.614 510.674516.579 513.749 40 5.59 6 1.8m 526.869 524.914 518.859 42 4.11 403.15 6 41 0.266 533.339 523.924 524.984 7D 40D 38D 116BXCUT GH B. H. No..A/326 F.K.S...... 541.60(5.35) DEPTH....310.00 28D GH GH GH 506.53 504.38 488.75 473.67 51 2. 83 8 50 9. 58 8 51 3. 04 3 52 4.31 8 51 9. 08 8 52 2.63 51 1. 65 6 50 4. 93 6 502.09 505.899 497.899 494.804 483.759 BE LT RO AD 434. 00 41 9. 61 396 .9 6 401.4 2 39 6.5 4 405 .7 2 39 4.0 39 4.36 39 1.43 48 9. 23 48 1. 04 49 0.5 9 46 6. 75 45 7. 26 45 4.61 47 5. 92 22D 3.5m 410 .4 1 41 8.3 3 393.3 4 39 5. 87 3.5m 4.5m 4.5m 49 4.8849 5. 53 24D 26D 23D 24D 26D 28D 30D 32D 34D 36D GH 452.72 459.66 457.95 458.29 1.6 2 0.7 0.8 1.20.6 0.4 0.8 0.7 0.6 2 2 UG B.H. TO K.S. 50 1. 32 49 4. 99 471.03 469.04 467.46 452.21 107L 48 8.4 1 0.8 0.8 0.7 0.7 441 .9 7 435 .9 4431 .6 9 424 .8 0 42 0.2 3 JHw 96L 0.6 0.4 B. H. No..A/324 S.L.... .....802.21 DEPTH....365.00 DIA.. ......10CM F.K.S...... 444.71(7.70) 484.50 478.48 487.26 461.73 460.4 1 458.0 5449 .4 7 506 .5 3 49 4. 66 6.5m PANEL No.S-21 1.4m 1.4m 0.5m 0.5m 0.2M 0.3M 0.3M 0.45M 12D 16DN 18D 20D 119L 15D 16DS BELT LEVEL BELT DIP BELTDIP 407.2 9 436 .2 8 40 3.95 40 8.18 41 5.50 41 2.01 1m 120L 120L 120L 22D GH GH GH GH GH GH HAULAGE DIP HAULA GE DIP 39 4.59 39 9.34 40 4.46 39 7.7 39 7.69 403.4 8 404.5 1 41 3. 67 425 .0 943 1. 97 43 7. 97 447.4 8 400 .5 403.5 3 400. 92 122L GH GH 122L 16BD 1.6m 2m 1.6m 16DN 16AD 18D 19D 94L 91L 5D 3D 1D MID 122L 123L 39 7.36 39 5.55 39 2.38 40 0. 47 403.7 9 410.5 1 1m 1m 1.6m D/H E/H D/H 13D EH END LESS HAULAGE END LESS HAULAGE J/H 123L 392.62 2.5m 39 4.1 8 400.4 7 395.6 8 408.5 1 410 .2 3 417 .7 1423. 33 428 .3 5 47 4. 68 47 8. 52 46 3.10 463 .35 44 9.23 43 9.2 0 527. 47 474 .7 6 465 .3 7 3 2A 2 3 2A 2 B.H. No..A/342 FKS-382.10 BOUNDARY 3 2A 2 FKS-....429.39 B.H. No..A/306 P BORE HOLE DEPTH....240 DIA........10CM B.H. No. .A/320 DEPTH....310.00 F.K.S......516.23(5.35) B. H. No..A/323 DEPTH.. ..367. 00 F .K.S......449.25(6.80) B.H. No..A/286 DEPTH..365.93 F.K.S.... 448.68(6.86) B.H. No.. A/285 DEPTH....407.55 F.K.S...... 403.80(5.45) B.H. No..KSB-7 DEPTH....431.92 F.K.S......409.61(6. 05) B.H. No.. A/311A DEPTH....375.00 B.H. No.. A/316 DEPTH....435.00 F.K.S......383.44(5.60) B.H . No..A/11 5 DEPTH ....396.2 4 F.K .S......52 0.6 5(5 .37 ) B.H. No. .KSB-5 DEPTH....339.38 B.H. No.. A/119 DEPTH....262.1 B.H. No..KSB-14 S.L.... .....804.07 DEPTH....153M DIA.. ......10CM B.H. No..A/319 DEPTH....236 B.H. No..A/338 DEPTH....216.50 B.H. No..A/337 DEPTH....216.50 B.H. No..A/336 DEPTH.... 213.00 B.H. No.. A174 B.H. No.. A178 B.H. No.. A175 DEPTH....159.50 B.H. No.. A157 DEPTH....161.85 DIA...... .....15CM DEPTH....115.06 NO 1 ... 727.44 (19.58) S.L........ ....798.84 DIA...........15CM DEPTH....65.68 NO 1SEAM ...780.210 (13.72) S.L.. ..........803.070 B.H. No. . A183 DEPTH....56.80 B.H. No.. A118 DEPTH.... 169.840 B.H. No.. A185 DEPTH....53.03 B.H. No.. A/313 DEPTH.... 420.00 F.K.S......391.85(5.90) B.H. No..A/350 (MPBX) DEPTH....285.00 B.H. No..A/340 46 2. 39 44 7.36 439 .5 7 442.98 454 .2 6 52 5.5 5 430 .9 44 44 1.1 2 42 9.12 43 4.18 3 44 7. 97 45 3.64 3M 2M 0.8 M 115L 117L 115L 117L 41 9.07 417.23 42 2. 71 426.2 3 454 .9 2 443 .6 0 434 .6 8 41 6. 36 119L 417.2 3 412 .2 5 1.4m 1.2m0.4M 0.4 1m 1.4m 1.4m 0.5m 0.65m 0.6m 0.8m 562.13 563.38 559.72 539.48 541.26 563.658 561.313 565.412 567.242 567.102 562.972 558.625 554.563 549.663 547.228 550.298 555.503 570.537 566.498 545.818 113L 42 3.03 1 43 1.35 1 42 7.74 6 421.03 6 42 4.486 41 6.91141 9.021 PANEL STD. ON 20-05-11
  • 10. STABLE ROOF IN THE LEVEL GALLERY AFTER RE ORIENTATION 7. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS 1. PHYSICAL MAPPING LARGELY HELPED TO DERIVE STRESS ORIENTATION IN THE STUDY AREA TO BE N450E. 2. THE DATA IS VALIDATED WITH THAT OF OVERLYING QUEEN SEAM AS WELL AS ADJACENT BLOCK i.e. VK-7 SHAFT. 3. FURTHER IT IS VALIDATED WITH NUMERICAL MODELLING DATA. 4. FINDINGS OF ALL THE ABOVE STUDIES ARE IN GOOD AGREEMENT WITH EACH OTHER. 5. BASED ON THE RECOMMANDATIONS (to drive Level Galleries in N850E) OF ABOVE STUDIES, STABLE ROOF CONDITIONS COULD BE ESTABLISHED. ******