Virginia Tech E-Club: John Geikler on Intellectual Property
1. IP 101 and Technology Licensing VT E-Club October 11, 2010 Virginia Tech Intellectual Properties, Inc.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
Editor's Notes
IP management–some generic background re IP, indicate broader applications but focus on licensing of VT technology
Returned to my alma mater after 29 years – in between: Westinghouse – International licensing & tech transfer – defense, nuclear & industrial systems Imaging & Sensing (W spin-off) – licensing, strategic & new product development & M&A Strategic Alternatives (start-up) - Tech transfer & other consulting for semiconductor consortium funding $60 M/yr university research VNI -Germany & UK as Manager for HPC software firm RTI – commercialization & tech scouting for NASA, intel community, university & corporate clients
From weaker to stronger
Example: recipe for Coca Cola Good to protect what can’t be reverse engineered
Example: Coca Cola scripted name Often linked with branding
Example: Coca Cola Polar Bear ad
Types Utility – Example: Coca Cola Bottle Sorter Design – Example: Coca Cola Bottle Design Cost of a patent over its life is ~ $30-$50k per country Strong but not long – protect what can be reverse engineered
Questions: How do you decide when to patent vs. keep as trade secret? Why protect Coke recipe with a trade secret? Why trademarks and design patents on Coca Cola bottle?
Societal benefit may sound corny but is a key cornerstone to commercialization decisions – e.g. releasing software as open source IP rights can provide the incentive to commercialize that allows a product/service to come to market without protection, good ideas may languish and never get commercialized Bayh-Dole – universities can own the IP from Federal research
Based on research revenue, VTIP has comparable licensing revenue Based on # disclosures, VTIP has ½ the staff & ¼ patent budget of other universities VTIP licensing professionals have significant experience
Patentability/Protectability(Can We?) – Most university licensing is strongly tied to patents – not so much other IP also software copyright, but much weaker Commercial potential (Should We?) Answering these questions is key to VTIP decision on moving forward with a technology VTIP is intended to generate revenue greater than its costs
Quick summary of VTIP’s other responsibilities - along with managing IP protection, VTIP conducts market research including discussions with experts in the target “value chain” develops and implements marketing campaigns facilitate interested companies’ discussions with the inventor & evaluation of the technology negotiates license agreements manages the distribution of royalty income. Realistically: From time we receive invention disclosure until product sales that generate royalties between 5-10 years, if ever. Most university tech transfer has a single technology that generates over 50% of their revenue
Many other factors
Many other factors
Many ways to put value on a technology 25% of operating margin is relatively well established fair value for inventor Comparables deals are very strong A few principles help guide negotiations