Європейський інвестиційний банк – Львів

ERD / LOT 2 – Solid Waste
Framework Services Support for Eastern Partnership countries Solid Waste projects –
Municipality of Lviv Ukraine
LLvviivv  SSoolliidd WWaassttee AAssssiiggnnmmeenntt


CCoouunnttrryy::  UUkkrraaiinnee
EERRDD  //  LLOOTT  22  ––  SSoolliidd  WWaassttee  ((FFrraammeewwoorrkk  AAggrreeeemmeenntt))


INCEPTION NOTE
November 2015

ENVIROPLAN S.A. (Leader) and its Consortium Partners
CDM SMITH Europe GmbH – ICP mbH – KOCKS Consult GmbH – LOUIS BERGER
page | 2

ENVIROPLAN S.A. (Leader), CDM SMITH Europe GmbH – ICP mbH –
KOCKS Consult GmbH – LOUIS BERGER
23 Perikleous str
15344 Gerakas/Athens ‐ Greece
Tel: +30 210 6105127 / 8
Fax: +30 210 6105138
Email: info@enviroplan.gr

Project: Framework Services Support for Eastern Partnership countries Solid
Waste projects – Municipality of Lviv Ukraine

Reference No: Framework Agreement Lot 2: Consultancy Company – Solid Waste ‐ Ref.
VP‐1096 – 2013/S 58‐94089, corrig. 2013/S 83‐138535

Document title: Inception Note Final

Date: November 2015
Client: European Investment Bank (EIB)
Drafted by: George Tavoularis – Solid Waste Management Expert
Christos Tsompanidis – Procurement Expert (Team Leader)
Checked and approved: Theofanis Lolos – Project Director







Disclaimer:
The contents of this publication are the sole responsibility of ENVIROPLAN S.A. and its consortium
partners, CDM SMITH Europe GmbH – ICP mbH – KOCKS Consult GmbH – LOUIS BERGER  and in no
way can be taken to reflect the views of EIB

page | 3
Table of Contents
1 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................... 4
2 PROJECT BACKGROUND....................................................................................................................... 4
3 IMPLEMENTATION PLAN...................................................................................................................... 7
4 COORDINATION WITH OTHER PROJECTS ............................................................................................ 14
5 TIMETABLE ........................................................................................................................................ 14

ANNEXES
ΑΝΝΕΧ 1: Waste Questionnaire…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………16

List of Tables
Table 1: Morphological composition of solid domestic wastes (2013) ..................................................................9

List of Photos
Photo 1: Map of Lviv showing the position of existing landfill in Grybovychi and proposed landfill in Verkhnya
Bilka ........................................................................................................................................................................5
Photo 2: a) View of disposal plateau in Grybovychi landfill, b) entrance of the landfill with security house and
weighbridge, c) leachate lagoon with landfill on the right side and d) acid tar lake in the background................6
Photo 3: a) View of available land in the Lviv Heat Power Plant for construction of future SWM facilities, b)
aerial view from the top of the Plant’s building...................................................................................................10
Photo 4: Panoramic view of proposed municipal landfill site in Verkhyna Bilka with village in the background 13

List of Acronyms
UAH Ukrainian Hryvnia (currency of Ukraine)
EIA Environmental Impact Assessment
EIB European Investment Bank
MRF Materials Recovery Facility
SWM Solid Waste Management
PAYT Pay as you Trough
WEEE Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment

page | 4
1 Introduction

Following the Framework Agreement dated on 04/02/2014 (Lot 2: Consultancy Company – Solid
Waste ‐ Ref. VP‐1096 – 2013/S 58‐94089, corrig. 2013/S 83‐138535), between EIB and ENVIROPLAN
S.A. as a leader of an International Consortium, a Request for Proposal was sent on 29/05/2015 for
providing the services defined in the assignment’s Terms of Reference, under the title: “Framework
Services Support for Eastern Partnership countries Solid Waste projects”.
ENVIROPLAN S.A. was awarded this assignment on 01/07/2015. The official commencement date of
the project is 24th
August 2015, whereas the total period of implementation is until 30/06/2016. The
Project team has mobilised itself and commenced work; also it has familiarized with the available
reports sent by EIB and in particular:

1. Pre‐Appraisal Report Lviv ‐Solid Waste , prepared by Aquapro for EIB, 2014
2. Pre‐Assessment of Candidate Sanitary Landfill Sites – Lviv, prepared by International Finance
Corporation, 2013
3. Options for Private Sector Participation in Waste Management Solutions for the City of Lviv,
prepared by International Finance Corporation, 2012
The kick‐off meeting has been held on 28th
September in the premises of Municipality of Lviv with
the attendance of the Mayor, the Deputy Mayors, the head of the Housing Office, the head of
foreign economic relations and investment office, EIB and the Consultants. During the mission from
28th
– 29th
of September 2015, three (3) site visits to the existing landfill and two (2) new proposed
sites (for landfill and MRF), as well as various technical meetings have taken place. The persons from
Lviv authorities that participated are:
1. Andriy Sadovyy, City Mayor
2. Victor Pushkariov, First Deputy Mayor
3. Volodymyr Shevchuk, deputy mayor on questions of urban planning and infrastructure
4. Yurii Holets, the head of the Housing Office
5. Olha Syvak, head of foreign economic relations and investment office
6. Bohdan Horbal, the director of Lviv Municipal Enterprise “Zbyranka”
The present report regards the Inception Note and outlines the suggested implementation plan for
the assignment, as well as the main findings from the meetings, the site visits and the previous
studies analysed by the project team.
For the mission, the replacement of Mr Reynaldo Cruz‐Rivera Solid Waste Management Expert by Mr
George Tavoularis has been agreed, as per email of 23.9.2015.

2 Project Background

Lviv is a city in Western Ukraine with a population of about 750,000 inhabitants and a total
municipal waste generation of ca. 260,000 tonners per year. Lviv is a progressive cultural and
industrial center of the region, a major transportation hub, a scientific and educational center. The
city is characterized by high density of buildings in a limited area. Tourism and industry are actively
developing.
During the last years, works associated with solid wastes management began, accompanied by
separate collection in certain areas, recycling and treatment. Collection and transportation of solid

page | 5
waste in the city is performed by 5 companies, each one operating in a certain district. The activities
of the companies are described later in the report. However, waste management system in Lviv is
still underdeveloped with many shortcomings.
Disposal of municipal waste takes place in an EU non‐compliant landfill, located in the village of
Grybovychi (photos 1 and 2). The area of the landfill is 38,8 hectares, of which 26 ha are the disposal
cells. It is operated since 1959. The amount of waste is estimated to 50 millions m3
, with waste
height 45‐60 m (according to report “Options for Private Sector Participation in Waste Management
Solutions for the City of Lviv”, 2012). In 2014, 237.900 t municipal waste have been delivered for
disposal.
In the past (1970 – 1990), industrial, mostly hazardous waste has been deposited, originating from
the oil and galvanizing industry. In certain points, there are 3 acid tar ponds with high hydrocarbon
content (a chemical analysis has been asked). The ponds are owned by the state oil company which
is now bankrupt and not by the municipality. The produced leachate from the landfill are collected in
a leachate pond of 60.000 m3
volume and afterwards are partially treated in a leachate
pretreatment plant. Also a leachate transport pipeline to the closest sewer pipe is currently being
constructed.
Although the site lacks sealing covers, its operation is controlled and there are in place the basic
infrastructure works such as a weighbridge, a security house with entrance control, a radioactivity
detector and a leachate treatment plant 15 m3
/d. The site operates with 38 people personnel (plus
around 40 scavengers), 3 bulldozers and 2 shifts, but occasionally also three. For 5 years, a biogas
collection and combustion facility has been installed and registered under the Kyoto Protocol. The
facility has stopped its operation two years ago. The biogas potential of the site is definitely an
advantage that could bring revenues (through energy utilization), and therefore it should be
included in the concept of future rehabilitation and partially finance the required investment.

Photo 1: Map of Lviv showing the position of existing landfill in Grybovychi and proposed landfill in
Verkhnya Bilka

page | 6

Photo 2: a) View of disposal plateau in Grybovychi landfill, b) entrance of the landfill with security
house and weighbridge, c) leachate lagoon with landfill on the right side and d) acid tar lake in the
background
The site within the existing boundaries has reached it’s volume capacity, and needs either to be
expanded or to be closed down and rehabilitated.
The expansion is not possible due to land availability and the close distance and optical vicinity of a
neighbour settlement. Therefore the Municipality decided to close and rehabilitate the landfill site.
The duration of landfill’s reclamation according to the prepared design will be 10 years which is
rather long period and needs to be shorter, whereas the total construction cost amounts to
213.155.172 UAH (with VAT) in 2013 prices or 19.378.000 Euro, at an exchange rate of 11 as of
14.10.2013.
A site close to village Verkhnya Bilka in the east of Lviv has been selected for the new municipal
landfill (photo 1).
To address the above shortcomings EIB is planning to support and finance an integrated solid waste
project under “The Municipal Infrastructure Programme” (UMIP) in two phases: initially promote
sustainable no‐regret, high impact/visibility solid waste measures for improving recycling and
recovery in Lviv. At a later stage other components of an integrated solid waste management system

page | 7
will be prepared, including a new sanitary landfill and potentially closure of the existing landfill and
residual waste treatment facilities.

3 Implementation Plan
The Tasks to be implemented under this Assignment and the respective approach are outlined in the
present section:

Task 1: Review of the current waste collection system
Objective
According to the ToRs, the objective is to “review the current waste collection system with a view to:
‐ Identify ways and means to increase the separate collection of materials,
‐ Assess the potential for collection of food‐waste that could be co‐digested in the planned
anaerobic digestion plant,
‐ Assess the potential for increasing the efficiency of residual waste collection and thus free up
resources to cover the costs of the future upgraded waste treatment and disposal system”.

The Team will review, verify and analyze the existing situation in the waste management sector. The
assessment shall cover:
Collect, review and assess the available waste related information and documentation
regarding national and local level
Review and assess the national waste management legislation
Review and assess the waste management policy with objectives already set up in the
national strategic and planning documents
Review and assess the existing waste organizational structure
Collect, review and assess all available waste related data from waste surveys, feasibility
studies and relevant projects
During the first mission, the Consultant has been informed by the authorities on the organization of
the waste collection system. In particular, Lviv city is separated into 5 territories, each of whom is
served by one collection company (four private and one communal). The companies are i) Ltd. "ABE‐
Lviv", ii) Ltd. "Spetsavtotrans Lions", iii) LCP "Transport firm" Lvivspetskomuntrans", iv) Ltd. "Sankoh"
and v) LLC "DV‐Ekosvit". The contracts are for 3 years and now they are about to finish at the end of
2016. The service users are households, budget institutions and commercial enterprises. The tariffs
set for example by the communal company Lvivspetskomuntrans is 382 UAH/tn, 389 UAH/tn and
416 UAH/tn respectively, whereas disposal costs are separate and range from 73 UAH/tn, 75 UAH/tn
to 80 UAH/tn respectively. Coverage of institutions and commercial enterprises is close to 100%,
whereas for blocks/houses is quite lower, approximately 70% due to unwillingness of private house’s
residents.
Households are billed monthly by the Housing Associations based on waste produced and property
size (sq.m.) and therefore the charging system has partly the characteristics of a PAYT system. The
Housing Associations in respect pay the collection companies and the landfill operator. Charges are
set only for mixed waste and not for recyclables. Bulky waste and WEEE can be collected by an on‐
call service.
The Consultant has also undertaken interview with three of the five waste collection companies,
namely ABE‐Lviv, Spetsavtotrans Lions and Lvivspetskomuntrans. The companies are operating
mainly with new trucks and bins. Recyclable bins are provided for plastic, glass and paper with

page | 8
collection once per week, but no specific targets are set for separate collection. There are low
revenues for recovered glass and paper. The participants expressed their belief that it is possible to
increase the amounts diverted and that a clean MRF would support and enhance the recycling
activity. It can be said that the Municipality handles sufficiently the collection service, at least for
mixed waste whereas for recyclable system could be improved to increase the efficiency and can be
expanded to include also other streams.
All stakeholders have agreed that public information and awareness is essential for the direction.
The most common problems – deficiencies addressed by the waste collection companies are:
Short period of contracts (3 years) don’t allow for long term planning
Scavengers is a serious constrain for increase recycling level
Public awareness is lacking and is considered essential.
The Consultant has further submitted a waste Questionnaire to the Lviv Municipality and all the
collection companies, so as to assess in detail the current situation and incorporate all data into the
review of the waste collection system and the current needs/ deficiencies. The Questionnaires have
not yet been received.

Task 2. Identification and comparison from effectiveness, cost‐efficiency and environmental point
of view of different waste diversion options ‐ discussion with the Municipality and funders
different options to complement the current separate collection of recyclables and
thereby increase diversion of waste from the landfill

According to the Sub‐Assignment ToRs, the objective of this Task is to “identify and compare from
effectiveness, cost‐efficiency and environmental point of view, and discuss with the Municipality and
funders, different options to complement the current separate collection of recyclables and thereby
increase diversion of waste from the landfill. Such options could e.g. include:
1) Civic amenity sites/recycling centres where citizens can bring e.g. household hazardous waste,
construction and demolition waste, bulky waste, garden waste.
2) Complementary facilities for treating separately collected waste streams, such as a basic
material recovery facility (MRF) for refinement of recyclables, and a composting facility for bio‐
waste, both on a scale that can be well justified. The scoping of waste diversion measures should
consider the need to identify alternative livelihoods for waste pickers that today are active on
the existing landfill that will be closed”.

The Consultant has reviewed and assessed the existing reports, listed above in Task 1. These reports
do not handle waste diversion measures based on source separation; ore report proposes a large
sorting facility from commingled waste to produce RDF for the cement industry. Following the first
mission, the Consultant has identified the following key points:
1. The collection service is up to date and well covered, at least for mixed waste and can be
expanded to increase its efficiency for recovery of recyclables and include other streams.
Separate collection has been introduced to the Municipality (albeit with low quantities
gathered) and the citizens are to a certain degree accustomed to the recycling practice and
the associated benefits to the environment
2. The collection companies are aware that important market opportunities exist in the
recycling sector. However, they have to overcome some barriers with quality, end‐users,
long distances and market extortions and would welcome the construction of a clean MRF in
the municipality

page | 9
3. In regard to the biowaste, no separate collection is practiced up to date
4. Lviv municipality is very keen to promote waste diversion measures that can act as
demonstrating exemplar in Ukraine and inspire similar initiatives in other local authorities
5. In regard to waste composition, the following analysis has been given in the Pre‐Appraisal
Report Lviv ‐Solid Waste (Aquapro, 2014), page 11:
Table 1: Morphological composition of solid domestic wastes (2013)
№ Wastes composition Component, %
1 Food wastes (vegetables, fruits, garden waste, etc.) 26
2 Paper and cardboard 15
3 Polymers (plastics, molded plastics) 22,7
4 Glass 4
5 Ferrous metals 1,5
6 Non‐ferrous metals 0,3
7 Textile 8
8 Wood 5,5
9 Household hazardous wastes   0,2
10 Bones, leather, rubber 1,8
11 Solid wastes residue after removing components
(small debris, rocks, street sweepings, etc.)
15
Total: 100

The rationale of this Task is to assist the Municipality towards a more sustainable waste
management system. Based on the data gathered under Task 1, the short‐term, no regret, high
impact/visibility solid waste measures of suitable capacity will be identified. These investments
could be financed by EIB under the UMIP framework and will include indicatively a number of civic
amenity centers, an MRF for clean recyclables and a composting plant for garden/park/market
waste. As high impact measures, it is expected that they will find high public acceptance. The specific
objective is to identify efficient waste diversion measures that would
i) move upwards the waste hierarchy
ii) sensitize and engage the public in active participation in source separation
programs
iii) produce “high quality” recyclables and compost
iv) contribute to future compliance with the EU Acquis
v) avoid solutions entailing separation of mixed waste
In this respect, the measures must focus on effective separate collection and also not bear an
excessive capital investment. The methodology that will be followed to propose waste diversion
options, includes the following steps:
Step 1: Collection and elaboration of data for the current situation of waste management (Task 1)
Step 2: Forecast of Lviv’s future population and municipal waste production
Step 3: Selection of waste streams that will be collected separately (such as packaging, food, green,
market, household hazardous, bulky, C&D, electronic waste, etc) and associated capture/diversion
rates; search for a number of suitable available urban area for Civic amenity centres (CAC)

page | 10
Step 4: Analysis of scenarios for sorting/treatment waste streams and justification of the capacity of
the required plants, including: Calculation of targets, mass balances, dimensioning, outputs, end‐
users, investment costs and operational costs
Step 5: Involvement of the private sector and possible institutional re‐arrangements
Step 6: Procurement options, i.e. public financing via loan or PPP or combination, etc
Step 7: Proposals for future improvement via other tools, legislative, institutional, boosting
markets/demand for recyclable materials/compost, etc
Other pilot activities (indicatively home composting), as well as suitable prevention measures (e.g.
re‐use workshop in the CAC), will be also considered.
During the mission, a site visit was also made to the local Heat Power Plant. The visit confirmed that
an available Municipal land of 1000 m x 150m (photo 3) can be allocated for the construction of the
future MRF and Composting Plant.


Photo 3: a) View of available land in the Lviv Heat Power Plant for construction of future SWM
facilities, b) aerial view from the top of the Plant’s building
The deliverable of this Task will be a Waste Diversion Concept Note with proposal for waste
diversion components.

page | 11

Task 3. Prepare detailed designs and tender documents for agreed waste diversion measures

According to the Sub‐Assignment ToRs, the objective of this Task is to “Prepare detailed designs and
tender documents for agreed waste diversion measures including bill of quantities, cost estimates,
technical specifications and full tender dossier for supplies, and works if applicable, according to a
suitable procurement approach. The designs should comprise relevant design drawings, construction
details and cross‐sections meeting both relevant Ukrainian guidelines and regulations and best
industry practices. For tender purposes it can be assumed that the scope of the measures will be as
described in the preceding Task. The consultant shall assist the Municipality in identifying suitable
sites for any physical installations, and where applicable support the Municipality with obtaining
required approvals and permits for designs prepared under this First Sub‐Assignment”.

The Consultant shall prepare the Detailed Design for the selected solution, in accordance with the
EU and local legislation, with BAT (best available technology) and with current best practice in the
country. Special attention will be given during the design to allow for open technologies, in order to
attract as many as possible candidate Contractors. As mentioned, a site in the local Heat Power Plant
can be allocated for the construction of the future MRF and Composting Plant. The consultant shall
assist the Municipality in evaluation other suitable sites for CACs proposed by the Municipality.
The technical documentation shall comprise explanatory notes and calculations for the following
parts of design: technology, civil construction, water supply and sewerage, heating and ventilation,
electricity supply, automation systems, and economics. Specifications for each of the proposed
works shall be produced. The Specifications shall clearly specify the quality of materials to be used in
all construction and equipment supplied.
Tender Dossier will be prepared both for Works as well as for Supply of equipment.
The Tender Dossier for Works will correspond to FIDIC Red Book and comprise the following main
volumes:
Volume I
Volume I contains the invitation, the instruction to tenders and other forms to be submitted by the
tenderers.
Volume II
Volume II contains the model contract, the General Conditions of Contract and guarantee Forms.
Volume III
Volume III of FIDIC Red Book regards the “Technical Specifications” for the construction (for
earthworks, concrete works, buildings, roads, mechanical and electrical works, etc), which is in line
with the detailed design study.
Volume IV
Volume IV regards the “Bill of Quantities”, containing an itemized breakdown of the works to be
carried out in a unit price contract, indicating a quantity for each item and the corresponding unit
price to be filled.
Volume V
Volume V, contains the “Tender drawings” and the full accompanying surveys, permits, decisions (in
Annex form prepared for each respective facility).

page | 12
Special attention will be paid to testing and taking‐over of works and the Contractor post‐construction
services.
In regard to the Supply of equipment, the Tender Dossier contains also certain template forms for
invitation, instruction to tenders, model contract, General Conditions guarantee forms, etc.
Additionally, the “Technical Specifications” of the equipment and the Financial Offer are included.
The deliverable of this Task will be Waste Diversion Design and Tender Documents, i.e. full detailed
designs (including but not limited to drawings, BoQ, technical specifications, EIA) and tender
documents for the agreed waste diversion measures.

Task 4. Support the Municipality of Lviv in the consecutive supply, and if applicable, works tender,
responding to clarification requests, evaluation of proposals and conclusion of contract.

The objective of this task is to “support the Municipality of Lviv in the consecutive supply, and if
applicable, works tender, responding to clarification requests, evaluation of proposals and conclusion
of contract”.
There will be launched one tender for works separated into Lots (for example Lot 1: Composting
Plant, Lot 2: MRF, Lot 3: CACs). Also, there will be launched one tender for the supply of equipment
such as , skips, containers and trucks; alternatively the equipment can be incorporated in the works
tender, if the budget is low.
Clarifications will be provided to questions of the candidate Bidders, if the case.
Upon receipt of tenders the Consultant will participate in the tender evaluation committee as an
observer. The Consultant will in this process provide the Contracting Authority with all technical
expertise and opinion required. The Consultant will for each tender received, assess the technical
compliance with the requirements as included in the tender documents and the eligibility of the
bidding company. The Consultant will check the scope of supply for conformity with the technical
specifications. The Consultant may also be called upon to assist Municipality with the negotiations
with the selected bidder.

Task 5. Clarify outstanding issues required for EIB to prepare ToR for the subsequent integrated
solid waste management project preparation assignment, including assessing the
appropriateness of the proposed site for a new landfill based on existing information /
Assist the City of Lviv in awareness building for the neighboring village
The objective of this task is to “clarify outstanding issues required for EIB to prepare ToR for the
subsequent integrated solid waste management project preparation assignment, including assessing
the appropriateness of the proposed site for a new landfill based on existing information. Assist the
City of Lviv in awareness building for the neighbouring village, e.g. through presentation of best
practice sanitary landfills and suggestions for suitable study visits in neighbouring countries”.

According to the previous 2014 report “Pre‐Assessment of Candidate Sanitary Landfill Sites – Lviv”,
two candidate sites are acceptable as sanitary landfill sites for Lviv City, namely Site 1 – Vysloboky
and Site 2 – Verkhnya Bilka. Τhe Municipality is currently considering Site 2 as the preferable one.
One of it’s main advantages is the fact that consists of a single property which belongs to neighbour
Municipality, who have also agreed to offer the area for this development. In the report, it is
quoted:

page | 13
“The size of the total site is about 100 ha. The village council has reserved a plot of around 35
ha for a cemetery. The remaining 65 ha is available for a landfill site. Thus the actual plot for
the landfill is to be determined.”, and
“The plan of the village council to establish a cemetery next to the landfill is socially
unfavourable.”
Contrary to the above, it has been clarified during the visit to the Verkhyna Bilka site (Photo 4) that i)
the available land for landfill development is 30‐35 ha and not 70 ha, an area which may not be
sufficient for its intended scope, ii) the cemetery is not intended for the village but for the entire
city of Lviv. It was already argued that the proximity of the landfill with the cemetery is not
compatible. Also, visual contact exists from the two neighboring villages, which is considered as a
disadvantage.

Photo 4: Panoramic view of proposed municipal landfill site in Verkhyna Bilka with village in the
background
With these concerns being raised, it was agreed that the Consultant must first further assess the
suitability of the proposed site and related development plans with a view to conclude whether the
site is suitable for the size of the landfill. In this respect, the Team has asked to receive the cadastral
maps of the plot, in order to measure the exact site’ borders and design – calculate the anticipated
capacity / lifetime, as elongated shape of proposed site elongation can decrease further it’s useful
volume.
Although there are no changes expected in regard to the preliminary agreement with the village,
who owns the plot, it was advised that the municipality continues to search for alternative sites and
re‐approach local communities and/or reconsider the decision for sitting the main municipal
cemetary.
Once the on‐going site selection is finalised, the consultants will also assist the city of Lviv in
awareness building for the local communitites on the operation of sanitary landfills. A study tour can
be organized, for example to Romania to visit similar facilities.
The output of this Task will be a brief Note with the input to the ToR for the integrated solid waste
management project, including assessment of the site proposed for the new landfill and likelihood
for acceptance from the neighbouring village.

Task 6. Review the key aspects of the approved landfill closure design for the existing landfill
serving the city of Lviv with a view to assess its acceptability in relation to international
standards and best practices
The objective of this task is to “review the key aspects of the approved landfill closure design for the
existing landfill serving the city of Lviv with a view to assess its acceptability in relation to
international standards and best practices”.

page | 14
It is clearly understood that the landfill is in urgent need of closing & rehabilitation, due to a long
operation without undertaking the environmental protective measures and due to volume
limitations. The Team has been informed that the landfill’s restoration design has been elaborated
on a detail level and the respective expertise has been granted. Funding however is not yet
available. Disposal and restoration in phases will be carried in parallel, therefore the duration ‐ 10
years – is rather long compared to similar projects. The consultant noted that some land exploitation
that could achieve additional capacity within the existing boundaries is possible, by rehabilitating the
leachate lagoon.
The Municipality has sent by email layouts of the site, contents of technical description and certain
provisions of the design (for example top cover layers) ‐ but not full design volumes. The acid tar
ponds are not responsibility of the city (but of the state’s oil company now under liquidation),
however due to proximity they are also addressed in the plan.
Key aspects of the design will be reviewed and areas that could be improved or are not acceptable
will be identified. Minor changes to the design and proposal can be done without the need for a new
technical expertise review. Following this, a decision will be taken whether and under what
conditions the closure can be included under EIB funding.
The output of this Task will be a common deliverable of Tasks 5 & 6, “ToR and Landfill Closure Note”
that will include the acceptability of the existing landfill closure design.

4 Coordination with other Projects
At present, there are no other TA projects running in parallel.
However, the Consultant is willing to participate and contribute in any meetings focusing on the
transposition of EU waste legislation to Ukranian law.

5 Timetable
According to the ToR, the Assignment is carried out in the period from 24th
Aug 2015 to 30th
Jun
2016, however initial planning is that deliverables have to be submitted within 4 months from
contract signature.
Due to the local elections on 25th
October and the fact that the waste questionnaires have not yet
been received, it would be necessary to reschedule the timing and duration of the previous Tasks
and the respective deliverables as illustrated in the next Gant Chart.

page | 15

page | 16

ANNEX 1: Waste Questionnaires
A. Data Gathering Questionnaires, to be completed by Municipality of Lviv and
B. Data Gathering Questionnaires, to be completed by Private Waste Collection Companies

page | 17

DATA GATHERING QUESTIONNAIRE

FOR

Solid Waste Management
Lviv ‐ Ukraine
Assignment financed by European Investment Bank (EIB)

October 2015

Prepared by:
ENVIROPLAN Consultants & Engineers S.A.
23 Perikleous & Iras Str., 15344 Gerakas‐Athens, GREECE
Tel. +30 210 6105127/8, Fax. +30 210 6105138
Home: http://www.enviroplan.gr

page | 18
Introduction

This data gathering questionnaire is designed to facilitate the assessment of the current situation of
solid waste management service in Lviv Municipality. The questionnaire should be filled by the
relevant Sanitary Service Department of the Municipality.

Contact Details

Please provide contact details for responsible person for Sanitary Service / Solid Waste Management
in the Municipality:

Name:........................................................ Position:..................................
Address:.....................................................Tel:...........................................Fax:............................
E‐mail: .......................................................

Please provide contact details for responsible person for completion of the questionnaire:

Name:........................................................ Position:..................................
Address:.....................................................Tel:...........................................Fax:............................
E‐mail: .......................................................

page | 19
1. Collection
1.1 Collection service coverage (total) for domestic premises for the year ........ ..

No of inhabitants No of inhabitants
not covered
Private Houses
Blocks of Flats

Collection service coverage (total)  for commercial/institutional premises for the year ...........

Number Number not covered
Commercial premises,
etc

Budget institutions

1.2 Total Amount of MSW waste collected last year ………….

Waste Type Amount Collected– t/ y Amount Collected–  m3/ y
1
Municipal and non hazardous
institutional, commercial and
trade waste

2 Street/park cleansing waste
3 Infectious medical waste
4 Bulky waste
5 Market waste
6 Industrial waste
7 Biowaste
8 Others
Total

1.3 Total amount of recyclable fractions collected / diverted from waste stream last year 2014

Recyclable Fractions Amount collected– t/y Amount collected– m3/y
Paper/Cardboard
Plastics
Metals
Glass
Other
Total

page | 20
1.4 Please provide your estimation for composition of MSW in for the following waste categories.
WASTE CATEGORIES %
WASTE GATEGORY 1: biowaste
Kitchen waste
Garden waste and waste from parks
WASTE CATEGORY 2: paper
Paper
Cardboard
Tetrapak
WASTE CATEGORY 3: plastics
Plastic packaging (PET, HDPE, PP, PVC, PS)
Plastic bags – Films (PE)
Rest plastics
WASTE CATEGORY 4: metals
Fe metals
Al metals
WASTE CATEGORY 5: glass
Glass
WASTE CATEGORY 6: combustibles
Wood
Textiles
Leather
Rubber
WASTE CATEGORY 7
Diapers
WASTE CATEGORY 8
Inert waste
WASTE CATEGORY 9
Other

page | 21
2. Personnel
Personnel for solid waste management services.

Category Total Number of employees
Managerial
Accountants
Technical Staff
Administrative
Other (workers, etc)
Total

3. Existing revenues and expenses of waste management system

3.1. Revenue (in local currency) of the authority for solid waste management
2014 2013 Revenue source
Budgeted Actual Budgeted Actual
User charges
Subsidies

Other (please
specify)

Total

3.2. Expenditure for solid waste management service (in local currency)
2014 2013 Expenditure items

Total costs for waste management analyzed in:
1. Cost for collection of
mixed waste

recyclable waste

3. Cost for treatment of
recyclables

4. Cost for disposal
1

5. Other (please specify)
2

TOTAL
1: Place separately cost for landfill tax, if the case
2: Such as insurances for personnel
3.3. Please provide a model copy of the contract with one private waste collection company

page | 22
4. Waste disposal
Items Disposal site Comments
1 Name of Site
2 Total area (ha)
3 Year when disposal started
4 Estimated life span remaining (year)
5 Amount of waste deposited daily (ton/day)
6 Number of Vehicles which deliver waste to landfill‐
per/day – week‐year

7 Distance from collection area to the site (km)
8 Existance of bottom lining
9 Disposal method (see notes below) Yes /No
10 Existence of waste pickers or scavengers on site, if yes,
please give estimated number
Yes /No
11 Collection of leachate Yes /No
12 Treatment of leachate Yes /No
13 Collection of biogas Yes /No
14 Treatment of biogas Yes /No
Note: For disposal method, please specify as follow:
O= Open dumping
C= Controlled tipping (with occasional soil cover)
S= Sanitary landfill (with daily cover)

Are technical drawings and topographic maps available?
..................................................................................................................................................................
..................................................................................................................................................................
..
Any studies available for the sites?
..................................................................................................................................................................
..................................................................................................................................................................
..

5. Awareness raising
Have any awareness raiging campaigns /events for solid waste management taken place?

Yes □ No □

If YES please provide the following information:

No. Thematic Area Target Group Period / Year
1

page | 23
2
3

6. Institutional Arrangements
Please provide details for any institutional arrangements already existing in the field of waste
management, like private operators involved in the waste management sector and provide all
relevant details as:
Type of Contract (e.g. PPP, concession, etc.)
Duration
Scope (e.g. operation of landfill, collection of recyclables etc.)
Value (total value per ton of waste or annual etc.)
Other helpful information
……………………………………………………………………………………………………………
……………………………………………………………………………………………………………
……………………………………………………………………………………………………………
……………………………………………………………………………………………………………
……………………………………………………………………………………………………………
……………………………………………………………………………………………………………
…………………………………
7. Problems encountered ‐ Overall comments
……………………………………………………………………………………………………………
……………………………………………………………………………………………………………
……………………………………………………………………………………………………………
……………………………………………………………………………………………………………
……………………………………………………………………………………………………………
……………………………………………………………………………………………………………
……………………………………………………………………………………………………………
……………………………………………………………………………………………………………
……………………………………………………………………………………………………………
…
8. Please provide your suggestions to improve the current situation
……………………………………………………………………………………………………………
……………………………………………………………………………………………………………
……………………………………………………………………………………………………………
……………………………………………………………………………………………………………
……………………………………………………………………………………………………………
……………………………………………………………………………………………………………
……………………………………………………………………………………………………………
……………………………………………………………………………………………………………
…

page | 24

DATA GATHERING QUESTIONNAIRE
by Private Waste Collection Companies

FOR

Solid Waste Management
Lviv ‐ Ukraine
Assignment financed by European Investment Bank (EIB)

October 2015

Prepared by:
ENVIROPLAN Consultants & Engineers S.A.
23 Perikleous & Iras Str., 15344 Gerakas‐Athens, GREECE
Tel. +30 210 6105127/8, Fax. +30 210 6105138
Home: http://www.enviroplan.gr

page | 25
Introduction

This data gathering questionnaire is designed to facilitate the assessment of the current situation of
solid waste management service in Lviv Municipality. The questionnaire should be filled by the
private waste collection company serving the Municipality.

Contact Details

Please provide contact details for responsible person for Sanitary Service:

Name:........................................................ Position:..................................
Address:.....................................................Tel:...........................................Fax:............................
E‐mail: .......................................................

Please provide contact details for responsible person for completion of the questionnaire:

Name:........................................................ Position:..................................
Address:.....................................................Tel:...........................................Fax:............................
E‐mail: .......................................................

page | 26
1. Temporary Storage
1.1 Does the Company have a storage bin standardization policy? If so, please briefly outline the
policy:
……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
1.2 Type and Number of storage bin used for mixed waste (please fill in the appropriate space and
provide relevant figures).

Residential premises Commercial premises Type of containers
5 m3
1.1 m3
240 lt 120 lt Other
(specify)
5 m3
1.1 m3
240 lt 120 lt Other
(specify)
Metal
bin

Plastic
bin

containers
(Number)
Others
(Specify)

Frequency of
collection (No per wk)

1.3 Type and Number of storage bin used for packaging waste (please fill in the appropriate space
and provide relevant figures).

Residential premises Commercial premises
Type‐No. of
Packaging waste
bins
1.1 m
3
240 lt 120 lt Other (i.e.
platic bags)
1.1 m
3
240 lt 120 lt Other (i.e.
platic bags)
Glass
Paper/Cardboard
Plastic
Metals
Combined
recyclables

1.4 Type and Number of storage bin used for other waste streams.

Residential premises Commercial premises
Type‐No. of Packaging waste bins Type and number of bins
i.e. 120 lt, 240 lt, 1.1 m
3
, other types
Type and number of bins
i.e. 120 lt, 240 lt, 1.1 m
3
, other types
Biowaste
Bulky waste
Waste electrical and electronic equipment
Special waste
Construction and demolition
Other

page | 27

2. Collection
2.1 Collection service coverage for domestic premises for the year ........ ..

No of inhabitants No of inhabitants
not covered
Frequency of
Collection
Private Houses
Blocks of Flats

Collection service coverage for commercial/institutional premises for the year ...........

Number Number not covered Frequency of
Collection
Commercial premises,
etc

Budget institutions

2.2 Amount of MSW waste collected last year ………….

Waste Type Amount Collected– t/ y Amount Collected– m3/ y
1
Municipal and non hazardous
institutional, commercial and
trade waste

2 Street/park cleansing waste
3 Infectious medical waste
4 Bulky waste
5 Market waste
6 Industrial waste
7 Biowaste
8 Others
Total

2.3 Estimated amount of recyclable fractions collected last year ...
Recyclable Fractions Amount collected– t/y Amount collected– m3/y
Paper/Cardboard
Plastics
Metals
Glass
Other
Total

page | 28

2.4 Please provide your estimation for composition of MSW for the following waste categories.
WASTE CATEGORIES %
WASTE GATEGORY 1: biowaste
Kitchen waste
Garden waste and waste from parks
WASTE CATEGORY 2: paper
Paper
Cardboard
Tetrapak
WASTE CATEGORY 3: plastics
Plastic packaging (PET, HDPE, PP, PVC, PS)
Plastic bags – Films (PE)
Rest plastics
WASTE CATEGORY 4: metals
Fe metals
Al metals
WASTE CATEGORY 5: glass
Glass
WASTE CATEGORY 6: combustibles
Wood
Textiles
Leather
Rubber
WASTE CATEGORY 7
Diapers
WASTE CATEGORY 8
Inert waste
WASTE CATEGORY 9
Other

page | 29
3. Collection and transport vehicles
Vehicle Type
Capacity
(m3
)
Ownership
Age
(years)
Type of collected
waste
km per
year
Compaction
vehicles

Open trucks

Other

4. Waste collection and transfer practices
4.1 Private contractor involvement
Please provide the following information:

Mixed MSW       □
Recyclables        □
Biowaste            □
Bulky                   □
Green                 □
Type of waste collected
Other................□
Name Collection areas (zones) covered
Other services included (street cleaning, sewage collection,
etc)?
Yes      □
No       □

4.2 Collection rounds and routes

Total number of collection rounds/day1
)
Collection vehicles follow predefined routes?   Yes      □ No      □
Is there a weekly collection schedule? (if YES please
attach)
Yes     □ No     □
Is commercial waste collected separately in different
routes from mixed msw collection?
Yes     □ No     □
1)
Collection Round: Round including collection and transportation to the disposal site. For example a
vehicle may perform 2 or 3 collection rounds per day.

page | 30

4.3 Collection practices

Please tick the right box and add also the type of waste which is collected under each option using
the following symbols (M, R, B):
M= Mixed waste
R= Recyclables
B= Bulky waste

Urban Population

Bring system Door to door On call service
Block appartments □ □ □
Individual houses □ □ □
Commercial entitities □ □ □
Budget Institutions   □ □ □

If many options apply please tick both boxes.

Rural Population

Bring system Door to door On call service
Block appartments □ □ □
Individual houses □ □ □
Commercial entitities □ □ □
Budget Institutions   □ □ □

5. Personnel
Personnel for solid waste management services.

Category Total Number of employees
Managerial
Engineers
Technical Staff
Drivers
for waste collection & transport
for other activities (e.g. landfill)
Workers
for waste collection & transport
for street sweeping & cleaning
for other activities (e.g. landfill)
Administrative
Other

page | 31
Total

6. Existing tariff system, revenues and expenses of waste management
system
6.1. Please, if available, provide copy of the last three (3) years of balance sheets, profits and loss
accounts and cash flows of communal company (ies) responsible for waste management
……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….…..
……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….…..
……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….…..
……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….…..

6.2. Existing tariff system for households (in local currency)
Please specify the fee for solid waste management which is paid by residents: ………………………………
(for example UAH/ person – month or UAH /household – year, etc)
It includes VAT:          YES / NO

Is it based on:
waste quantity,
consumer income level,
property size (area m2)
or other (please specify)
Please circle the correct answer and provide your comments
……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….…..
……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….…..
……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….…..
……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….…..

6.3. Existing tariff system for commercial and private entities (in local currency)
Please specify the fee for solid waste management which is paid annually by commercial and private
entities: ………………………………
It includes VAT:          YES / NO

Is it based on:
waste quantity,
income level,
property size
or other (please specify)
Please circle the correct answer and provide your comments
……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….…..
……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….…..
……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….…..

page | 32
……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….…..

6.4. Revenue (in local currency) of the company for solid waste management
2014 2013 Revenue source
Budgeted Actual Budgeted Actual
Residential user
charges

Commercial user
charges

Budget
institutions

Other (please
specify)

Total

6.5. Expenditure for solid waste management service (in local currency)
2014 2013 Expenditure items
INVESTMENT OPERATIONAL TOTAL INVESTMENT OPERATIONAL TOTAL
Total costs for waste management analyze in:
mixed waste

recyclable waste

3. Cost for treatment of
recyclables

4. Cost for disposal
1

5. Other (please specify)
2

TOTAL
1: Place separately cost for landfill tax, if the case
2: Such as insurances for personnel
7. Awareness raising
Have any awareness raiging campaigns /events for solid waste management taken place?

Yes □ No □

page | 33
If YES please provide the following information:

No. Thematic Area Target Group Period / Year
1
2
3

8. Problems encountered ‐ Overall comments
……………………………………………………………………………………………………………
……………………………………………………………………………………………………………
……………………………………………………………………………………………………………
……………………………………………………………………………………………………………
……………………………………………………………………………………………………………
……………………………………………………………………………………………………………
……………………………………………………………………………………………………………
……………………………………………………………………………………………………………
……………………………………………………………………………………………………………
…
9. Please provide your suggestions to improve the current situation
……………………………………………………………………………………………………………
……………………………………………………………………………………………………………
……………………………………………………………………………………………………………
……………………………………………………………………………………………………………
……………………………………………………………………………………………………………
……………………………………………………………………………………………………………
……………………………………………………………………………………………………………
……………………………………………………………………………………………………………
……………………………………………………………………………………………………………
…

Європейський інвестиційний банк – Львів

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

More from Nazar Tuziak

More from Nazar Tuziak (6)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Європейський інвестиційний банк – Львів