CQA services are collaborative platforms where users ask and answer questions. We investigate the influence of national culture on people’s online questioning and answering behavior. For this, we analyzed a sample of 200 thousand users in Yahoo Answers from 67 countries. We use a number of cultural factors extracted from Geert Hofstede’s cultural dimensions and Robert Levine’s Pace of Life and show that behavioral cultural differences exist in community question answering platforms. We find that national cultures differ in Yahoo Answers along a number of dimensions such as temporal predictability of activities, contribution related behavioral patterns, privacy concerns, and power inequality.
Cultures in Community Question Answering. Imrul Kayes, Nicolas Kourtellis, Daniele Quercia, Adriana Iamnitchi, and Francesco Bonchi. ACM 26th Conference on Hypertext and Social Media (HT'15), 2015
Stunning ➥8448380779▻ Call Girls In Panchshil Enclave Delhi NCR
Cultures in Community Question Answering
1. 26th ACM International Conference on Hypertext and Social Media
Cultures in
Community Question Answering
Imrul Kayes
USF
Nicolas Kourtellis
Telefonica Research
Daniele Quercia,
Francesco Bonchi
Yahoo Labs
Adriana Iamnitchi
USF
2. 26th ACM International Conference on Hypertext and Social Media
Community Question Answering (CQA)
1
3. 26th ACM International Conference on Hypertext and Social Media
CQA Platforms
• CQA sites: Popular platforms
– Yahoo Answers (YA): 200M users, 5M users/day
– Quora: 1M/month
– Stack Exchange: 4M users (e.g., Stack Overflow)
• Functionalities:
– Q/A posts & comments, social networking,
leaderboards, and more.
• Why do we need them?
– Not all web-searches are successful!
– Complicated / intricate questions!
2
4. 26th ACM International Conference on Hypertext and Social Media
Motivating Question
Does national culture influence how users
participate in online CQA platforms?
3
5. 26th ACM International Conference on Hypertext and Social Media
Main Idea
• Analyze participation on YA per country
• Compute (or use) cultural indices of each
country
• Associate YA user participation attributes with
cultural indices and extract lessons
4
6. 26th ACM International Conference on Hypertext and Social Media
Outline
• CQA platforms
• Motivation
• Main idea
• Yahoo Answers Dataset
• Study on Levin’s Pace of Life
• Study on Hofstede’s Cultural Dimensions:
• Individualism vs. Collectivism
• Uncertainty Avoidance
• Power Distance Index
• Proposals for CQA platforms improvements
5
7. 26th ACM International Conference on Hypertext and Social Media
Yahoo Answers Dataset
• 200k users
• 490k follow edges
– SN properties*
• 9M questions
• 43M answers
• 4.5M abuse reports
(flags)
• 67 countries => 41 top activity countries
6
*Kayes et al. “The social world of content abusers in Community
Question Answering“, WWW’2015
8. 26th ACM International Conference on Hypertext and Social Media
Sampled users: a representative sample
7
s
s
d
r
er
n
s.
o-
n
el
e
s-
el
s
e
s-
the second highest correlation peak and thus included in the
study 41 countries which have at least 150 users per country.
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
DZ
AR
AU
AT
BD
BE
BO
BR
CA
CL
CN
CO
HR
CZ
DK
DO
EC
FI
FR
DE
GR
GT
IN
ID
IR
IE
IL
IT
JP
KE
LB
MY
MX
NL
NZ
NG
NO
PK
PE
PH
PT
RO
SG
ZA
ES
LK
SE
CH
TH TR
AE
GB
US
VE
VN
2
3
4
7 8
# Internet users (log scale)
#YAusers(logscale)
9. 26th ACM International Conference on Hypertext and Social Media
Selecting Countries
8
estions,
Guide-
e” func-
he con-
ommu-
e. Re-
s before
us cre-
mation
ns, an-
tomati-
n, users
sent to
rs from
se users
s/ user),
million
nnected
etwork.
ial net-
ntial fit-
user s for 67 count r ies. T he r egr ession line and
95% confi dence int er val ar ea ar e also shown. T he
count r ies ar e r epr esent ed by a 2-let t er count r y code
based on I SO 3166.
● ●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
● ● ●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
● ●
●
●
●
●
●
0.50
0.55
0.60
0.65
0.70
20 30 40 50 60
Number of top x countries
Correlation(#YAvs.#Internetusers)
Figur e 2: N umber of t op count r ies based on t he
number of YA user s and cor r elat ion wit h t heir num -
ber of I nt er net user s. A ll cor r elat ions ar e st at ist i-
cally signifi cant wit h p-value< 0.05.
• Pick the top 41 countries with:
• high correlation of #YA users vs. Internet users
• ≥ 150 users per country
10. 26th ACM International Conference on Hypertext and Social Media
Levine’s Pace of Life
• “The flow/movement of time that people
experience”
• Measured three time indicators in 31 countries:
• Walking speed
• Postal speed
• Clock accuracy
• Combined the 3 scores into a country-specific
score
9
11. 26th ACM International Conference on Hypertext and Social Media
Pace of Life in Yahoo Answers
• Higher Pace of Life Countries expected to have:
– Faster life with more rigid perception of time
– Planned and organized daily activities
• Maybe they are less likely to ask or answer
questions in busy hours
[H1]:
Users from countries with a higher Pace of Life
score show more temporally predictable activities
10
12. 26th ACM International Conference on Hypertext and Social Media
Predictability of activities in time
• 5 time intervals (I) & compute p(c):
• Compute Entropy of user u, given all activities:
• Entropyq/a/r,j: geometric mean entropy for country j
11
j
j
|Uj|
Entropyu =
- p(c)log(p(c))
cÎI
å
| logI |
6:00-8:59 9:00-17:59 18:00-20:59 21:00-23:59 00:00-05:59
Morning Office time Evening Late night Sleeping
p(c=1) p(c=2) p(c=3) p(c=4) p(c=5)
13. 26th ACM International Conference on Hypertext and Social Media
Predictability of activities in time
• Users from Higher Pace of Life countries show
more temporally predictable Q & A behavior in YA
• Not stat. significant for abuse reporting
12
14. 26th ACM International Conference on Hypertext and Social Media
Hofstede’s Cultural Dimensions
• Based on survey of IBM employees (‘60-’70s), 40
countries
• 6 dimensions (we study 3)
• Individualism vs. Collectivism <=
• Uncertainty Avoidance
• Power Distance Index
• Masculinity vs. Femininity
• Long-term vs. Short term orientation
• Indulgence vs. Restraint
13
15. 26th ACM International Conference on Hypertext and Social Media
Individualism in Yahoo Answers
• Integration of individuals in a group
• Higher individualism countries
– Emphasis on personal achievements & rights
– Less group harmony and loyalty
• Study 3 aspects of individualism in YA:
• Individualism vs. contribution
• Individualism vs. (un)ethical behavior
• Individualism vs. privacy concerns
14
16. 26th ACM International Conference on Hypertext and Social Media
Individualism & Contribution
• People from collectivist countries:
– Spend less time on the Internet
– More time in socialization
[H2]:
Users from countries with higher individualism
index provide more answers
[H3]:
Users from countries with higher individualism
index contribute more to the community than
what they take away from the community
15
17. 26th ACM International Conference on Hypertext and Social Media
Individualism vs. Contribution
• Higher Individualism index => more answers
– Pearson Correlation r = 0.46, p < 0.005
16
19. 26th ACM International Conference on Hypertext and Social Media
Individualism vs. Yielding
• Higher Individualism index => higher yielding
– Pearson r = 0.37, p < 0.05 18
20. 26th ACM International Conference on Hypertext and Social Media
Individualism vs. (un)ethical behavior
• More collectivist countries:
– More software and music piracy
– More offline world corruption
[H4]:
Users from more collective cultures have higher
probability to violate CQA norms
19
21. 26th ACM International Conference on Hypertext and Social Media
Individualism vs. (un)ethical behavior
• Higher Collectivist index => more probable to
violate community rules
– Pearson r = -0.48, p < 0.05 20
22. 26th ACM International Conference on Hypertext and Social Media
Individualism vs. Privacy Concerns
• Higher individualism hints to more privacy
concerns
[H5]:
Users from higher individualism index countries
exhibit higher level of concern about their
privacy.
21
23. 26th ACM International Conference on Hypertext and Social Media
Individualism vs. Privacy Concerns
• Users with ≥ 10 Q/A (79%)
• Modifications of privacy settings as a proxy of
privacy concerns (more public profiles=>less
privacy concerns)*
22
*More on privacy: Kayes et al. “Privacy Concerns vs. User Behavior
in Community Question Answering“, ASONAM’15.
24. 26th ACM International Conference on Hypertext and Social Media
Individualism vs. Privacy Concerns
• Higher Collectivist index => more probable to
find public profiles 23
25. 26th ACM International Conference on Hypertext and Social Media
Individualism vs. Power Distance
• PDI: the extent to which the less powerful
members of a society expect and accept that
power is distributed unequally
– Measures the distribution of wealth and power
between people
Indegree imbalance: Avg_Friend_InDegree-
User_InDegree
[H6]:
Users from higher power distance countries
show a larger indegree imbalance in follow
relationships
24
26. 26th ACM International Conference on Hypertext and Social Media
Individualism vs. Power Distance
• Higher Power Distance=>Higher Indegree Imbalance
– Pearson r = 0.65, p < 0.005
• Confirmation of the friendship paradox 25
27. 26th ACM International Conference on Hypertext and Social Media
Individualism vs. Uncertainty Avoidance
• Uncertainty Avoidance: the extent to which people
feel uncomfortable with uncertainty & ambiguity
• Higher uncertainty avoidance countries:
– Minimize uncertainty & ambiguity by careful
planning
– Planned and organized daily activities
– Enforce rules and regulations
[H7]:
Users from countries with higher uncertainty
avoidance index exhibit more temporally
predictable activities. 26
28. 26th ACM International Conference on Hypertext and Social Media
Uncertainty Avoidance vs. Activity
• Higher UAI users => lower Q, A, R entropies=>
more temporarily predictable activities
27
29. 26th ACM International Conference on Hypertext and Social Media
Summary
• Analyzed YA activities of 200k users, 67 countries
• Studied cultural indices from Hofstede’s dimensions
and Levine’s Pace of Life
• YA: not a platform of homogeneous culture
• National cultures differ in YA:
– Temporal predictability of activities
– Contribution-related behavior
– Privacy concerns
– Power inequality
• Cultural variations can be used for better CQA
platforms 28
30. 26th ACM International Conference on Hypertext and Social Media
Suggestions to CQA platforms
• Culture-aware CQA moderation
– In collective cultures: More moderators are needed
• Question recommendation
– In collective cultures: Questions should be routed to more users
– In higher Pace of Life countries: Questions should be routed to
more and diverse users in busy hours, or lower Pace of Life
countries
• Follow recommendation
– In lower PDI countries: Recommend similar indegree users
• Targeted Ads
– In individualistic cultures: focus on ‘I’ and ‘me’, textual,
informative ads
– In collective cultures: focus on ‘us’ and ‘we’, visual, symbolic ads29
31. 26th ACM International Conference on Hypertext and Social Media
Cultures in
Community Question Answering
Imrul Kayes
USF
Nicolas Kourtellis
Telefonica Research
Daniele Quercia,
Francesco Bonchi
Yahoo Labs
Adriana Iamnitchi
USF
Paper: http://arxiv.org/abs/1508.05044
nicolas.kourtellis@telefonica.com
Twitter: @kourtellis
Editor's Notes
68 % of google searches were successful (2011)
80% for Bing and Yahoo (2011)
2% on Yahoo lead to posts on YA.
To the best of our knowledge, we are the first to study cultural dimensions in CQAs and how they associate with user asking and answering, abuse reporting.
Proposed by psychologist Robert Levine
Walking speed (60ft)
Postal speed (1 stamp + change)
Clock accuracy (between 15 bank clocks and telephone company)
(Mooij, 2005)
Geometric mean of answers posted by users from a country vs. country’s individualism index
Exclude users with no answers
Husted, 2000, Ki et al. , 2006, Triandis et al., 2006
Cho et al. 2009
Country ranks are based on the percentage of public privacy settings and they are separately done for collectivist and individualistic countries.
The friendship paradox has been shown in Facebook and Twitter