4. ā¢ Until 2015, assisted dying was illegal
ā¢ Carter v. Canada (Attorney General)
ā¢ SCC struck down provisions of Criminal Code that
created absolute prohibition
ā¢ Charter rights of patients and physicians need to be
recognized
ā¢ Physicians not compelled to assist
ā¢ Declaration of invalidity suspended until
June 6, 2016
4
7. BILL C-14 (AN ACT TO AMEND THE CRIMINAL
CODE AND TO MAKE RELATED AMENDMENTS
TO OTHER ACTS (MEDICAL ASSISTANCE IN
DYING))
ā¢ Became law on June 17, 2016
ā¢ Permits medically-assisted dying in certain
circumstances
ā¢ Prescribes criteria for eligibility and safeguards
7
9. BILL C-14 (CONTāD.)
Who can participate in MAID:
ā¢ Provision of MAID:
ā¢ Physicians
ā¢ Nurse Practitioners
ā¢ Assist in provision of MAID:
ā¢ Pharmacists
ā¢ Health care providers
ā¢ Other persons
9
10. BILL C-14 (CONTāD.)
Eligibility Criteria:
ā¢ Eligible for health services
ā¢ At least 18 and mentally competent
ā¢ Grievous and irremediable medical condition
ā¢ Voluntary request
ā¢ Informed consent
10
11. BILL C-14 (CONTāD.)
Grievous and irremediable medical
condition:
ā¢ Serious illness, disease or disability
ā¢ Advanced state of irreversible decline
ā¢ Caused enduring physical or psychological
suffering
ā¢ Reasonably foreseeable death
11
12. BILL C-14 (CONTāD.)
Consent:
ā¢ Must be:
ā¢ Informed
ā¢ Expressed
ā¢ Written
ā¢ Voluntary
ā¢ Patient must fully understand the decision
12
13. BILL C-14 (CONTāD.)
Safeguards:
ā¢ Before providing MAID, physician or NP
must ensure:
ā¢ All eligibility criteria are satisfied
ā¢ Second, independent medical opinion is obtained
ā¢ Individual given opportunities to withdraw consent
13
15. APPLICATION
ā¢ Bill C-14 only contemplates involvement of
āpharmacistsā
ā¢ Ongoing debate about interpretation and
involvement of pharmacy technicians
ā¢ Section 21 of SCPP: MAID Practice
Guideline
15
16. SCPP MAID PRACTICE GUIDELINE
ā¢ Result of extensive consultation
ā¢ Pharmacists expected to undertake MAID
activities in accordance with this guideline
16
17. ETHICAL CONSIDERATIONS
ā¢ MAID raises important ethical issues
ā¢ Be prepared to respond quickly if asked to
participate in MAID
17
18. CONSCIENTIOUS OBJECTION
ā¢ May decline to participate in MAID for
reasons of conscience or religion, provided
that pharmacist complies with āRefusal to
Provide Products or Services for Moral or
Religious Reasons Statementā:
http://scp.in1touch.org/uploaded/web/refmanual/REF
_Refusal_of_Services_for_Moral-
Religious_Reasons_Stmt_Current.pdf
18
19. CONSCIENTIOUS OBJECTION
(CONTāD.)
ā¢ If objecting:
ā¢ Inform physician or NP at earliest opportunity
ā¢ Provide physician or NP with effective referral
ā¢ Inform pharmacy management of objections
ā¢ Do not impede or block access to information,
care or services for MAID;
ā¢ Take steps to ensure continuity of care for patient
19
20. PARTICIPATION REQUIREMENTS
Pharmacists who choose to participate MUST:
ā¢ Receive from physician or NP:
ā¢ Request for MAID
ā¢ Prescription for MAID
ā¢ Written confirmation that:
ā¢ Prescribed drug is intended for MAID for specified
patient
ā¢ patient meets all eligibility criteria; and
ā¢ Informed consent has been obtained
20
21. PARTICIPATION REQUIREMENTS
(CONTāD.)
ā¢ Have requisite competency
ā¢ Ensure that prescription for MAID meets
requirements
ā¢ Document MAID process using approved
forms
ā¢ Personally prepare, label and distribute
prescriptions for MAID
ā¢ No aspect of dispensing MAID drugs shall be
delegated
21
22. PARTICIPATION REQUIREMENTS
(CONTāD.)
ā¢ Store prepared MAID prescriptions in
pharmacyās locked safe
ā¢ Only release MAID prescriptions to
physician or NP on specified date
ā¢ Ensure that:
ā¢ patient counselling related to the drugs is provided
ā¢ Physician or NP has information re: preparation,
stability, storage and administration of drugs
22
23. PARTICIPATION REQUIREMENTS
(CONTāD.)
ā¢ Support secure and timely return and
disposal of any unused drugs
ā¢ Report information to any designated
government organizations in accordance
with any required format, manner and
schedule
ā¢ Refer any individuals seeking MAID to
physician, NP or appropriate RHA delegate
23
24. PRACTICE LIMITATIONS
Pharmacists shall NOT:
ā¢ participate in MAID without first receiving
request from physician or NP
ā¢ lead the MAID process
ā¢ assess a patient to determine if he or she
meets eligibility criteria
ā¢ collect patient consent for MAID
ā¢ prescribe drugs for MAID
24
25. PRACTICE LIMITATIONS (CONTāD.)
Pharmacists shall NOT:
ā¢ Dispense drugs intended for MAID as āoffice
useā
ā¢ Engage in any pharmacy practice that
presents a conflict of interest or
compromised professional independence,
judgment or integrity
25
27. CRIMINAL CODE
ā¢ s. 241(1): criminal offence for everyone who
aids a person to die by suicide
ā¢ imprisonment for up to 14 years
ā¢ S. 241(3) creates exemption for pharmacists
and others who aid a physician or NP in
providing MAID in accordance with all
requirements prescribed in section 241.2
27
28. CRIMINAL CODE (CONTāD.)
ā¢ Criminal offences also exist for:
ā¢ Forgery in relation to a request for MAID
ā¢ Destruction of documents relating to MAID
ā¢ Interfering with rights and obligations relating to
MAID
ā¢ Penalty of imprisonment for up to 5 years
28
29. OTHER CONSIDERATIONS
Non-compliance may also result in:
ā¢ Disciplinary action (termination of
employment and/or privileges)
ā¢ Professional discipline/liability
ā¢ Prosecution for other offences prescribed in
applicable legislation
29
31. Information Reporting
ā¢ Regulations prescribing information reporting
requirements not yet in force
ā¢ Limited information available to date
ā¢ Difficult to accurately assess:
ā¢ number of MAID requests
ā¢ number of medically-assisted deaths
ā¢ medical conditions that motivate requests
ā¢ if MAID is being consistently implemented across Canada
31
32. Quebec 469 Dec.10/15 ā Dec. 9/16
Ontario 365 June 17/16 ā March 31/17
B.C. 285 June 17/16 ā Feb. 28/17
Alberta 100 June 17/16 ā March 31/17
Manitoba 37 June 17/16 ā March 31/17
Nova Scotia 31 June 17/16 ā March 31/17
Saskatchewan 21 June 17/16 ā March 31/17
New Brunswick 9 June 17/16 ā Dec. 31/16
N.L. 7 June 17/16 ā March 31/17
P.E.I. 0 June 17/16 ā March 31/17
N.W.T. 0 -
Nunavut 0 -
Yukon * Would not divulge, saying small population
raises confidentiality concerns
32
MEDICALLY-ASSISTED DEATHS IN CANADA
**CBC News (April 20, 2017)
33. REGULATORY GUIDANCE
ā¢ Professional regulatory bodies across Canada
have implemented MAID guidelines and
standards
ā¢ Provincial legislative changes in some
jurisdictions
33
34. SASKATCHEWANāS PROGRESS
ā¢ Standard provincial processes and resources
being developed
ā¢ Patients interested in MAID advised to approach
their physician or NP
ā¢ CPSS and SRNA provide guidance to members
ā¢ SCPP has developed MAID practice guideline
34
35. FURTHER REVIEW
ā¢ Federal government required to initiate
review of issues not addressed by Bill C-14
(i.e. mature minors, advance requests, and
mental illness)
ā¢ Review expected to be complete by Dec.
2018
ā¢ Parliamentary review of Bill C-14 by June,
2021
35
36. CONSTITUTIONAL CHALLENGES
Lamb v Canada, Court file No S-165851 (BCSC):
ā¢ individual with spinal muscular atrophy & BC
Civil Liberties Association
ā¢ claim that certain requirements for MAID are
unconstitutional
36
37. CONSTITUTIONAL CHALLENGES
(Contād.)
Quebec government:
ā¢ Looking at ways to broaden eligibility for
medically-assisted dying
ā¢ seeking court's opinion to clarify requirement
that natural death be "reasonably foreseeableā
ā¢ result of concerns expressed by a variety of
professional organizations
37