Conceptual Slides outlining differences between SIP and S&OP

1. SupplyDemand
Capabilities
Capacity
Space
Talent
Time
Prisoners
Students
Applicants
Prospects
Clients
Projects
Time – 18-24 months
Overarching Strategic Imperative
SIP
Service Integrated Planning
aka SIP or “People S&OP”
Metrics
Alignment
Valuation
Scenarios
Service Balancing Process
copyright Patrick bower 2015

2. Executive Planning Conference
Demand
Gathering
Capabilities
Determination
“Service Family”
Planning Meeting
Service Demand Typing Service Capabilities Typing
Integrated Plan
Discussion
Metrics, Plan, Valuation, Departures, Issues, Questions
Tracking, Changes,
New, Updated Plan
Tracking, Changes,
New, Updated Plan
Feedback
Strategy
Approval
Feedback
Strategy
Approval
Service Integrated Planning
aka SIP or “People S&OP”
copyright Patrick bower 2015

3. SIP Elements vs. S&OP
• Monthly process (like S&OP)
• Forward looking planning (like S&OP)
• Service demand and supply is more amorphous – no generic
“widgets” to enable understanding.
• Service supply and demand “typing” is analogous to product
families in S&OP
• Data gathering process is less linear, and in many cases less
mathematical. Less likely to have time series data to leverage.
• Metrics are much different from S&OP and will vary by service sub-
sector
• New service capabilities / opportunities are discussed (like S&OP)
• Integrated planning with plan and scenarios, etc. are discussed (like
S&OP)
• Executive Summary meeting (like S&OP) with feedback loop is
important for alignment purposes.