SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 17
The New
Lanchester
Strategy
Building a successful start up and
fighting military battles have many of
the same qualities
What does it imply?
• Founding a start up is not for the feint of heart, much like leading an army
• Takes vision, determination and a confidence to continue with your instinct in
the face of adversity
The New Lanchester Strategy
• Takes it’s name from the English engineer, Fred W Lanchester
• He observed that size advantage on one side is the square of the number of
units in in the force
• Therefore, two opposing armies go to battle, one with a 2-to-1 advantage, the
firepower of the bigger army is quadrupled thus inflicting four times the
punishment
• So, concentrate your smaller force to attach to a single point of an enemy
• Once that battle is won, move onto the next small chunk with your
concentrated force and resources can overcome
• Theory based on the really old battle strategy of ‘Divide and Conquer’
The theory behind the New Lanchester
Strategy
• How much “fire power” will it take to beat an enemy?
• How can concentrating forces into a smaller portion of an enemy
be a better strategy for victory
Small
Army
Small
Firepower
Small
Force
Case studies
• Many prominent cases in history where a smaller force in sheer numbers has defeated
a much larger army
• Two such examples are the Battle of Thermopylae and the Battle of Trafalgar
Battle of Thermopylae
• Fought by the allied Greek states in 480 BC lead by King Leonidas of Sparta (The 300) against Persian
Empire of Xerxes.
• King Leonidas’ strategy was to defend the only passage way in
• Concentrated the battle at a single point
• Not have his inferior army flanked by the Persians
Battle of Trafalgar
• Lord Nelson fought the Battle of Trafalgar in 1805, facing the combined fleets of France and Spain with
his numerically inferior force
• Split the superior enemy fleet into two
• Decisive concentration of force to the rear of the Franco-Spanish fleet
• Franco-Spanish fleet lost twenty-two ships, without a single British vessel being lost.
Canon and Xerox
• Utilized a similar "battle" strategy in their conquest of Xerox
• Overwhelming rival in Rank Xerox
• Took a foothold in the market by first concentrating its resources
in Scotland
• Achieved a 40% market share
• Attacked selected and tightly defined regions in England
• Invested more and more in product development and sales
resource
• Final push into the lucrative London market
• Superior product and a numerically superior sales force. Rank
Xerox didn’t stand a chance
Check
Locate
Conquer
Expand
The New Lanchester Strategy in Business
• Transitioned into the corporate world for companies that are looking to enter
existing markets
• For a small company looking to take on the incumbents
• For a new start up looking to formulate a battle plan
Market Analysis
If a single company has 74% of the market, the market has
become an effective monopoly. For a start up, that’s an
unassailable position for a head-on assault. (think Microsoft)
Market Analysis
If the biggest player in a market has at least a 26% market share, the
market is unstable, with a strong possibility of abrupt shifts in the
company rankings. Here there may be some entry opportunities
Market Analysis
If the biggest player has less than 26% market share, it has no real
impact in influencing the market. Start ups who want to enter an
existing market find these the easiest to penetrate.
Rules Deducted
attacking a
company
that holds a
monopoly
head-on is
suicide.
no start up has
enough cash to
out spend an
industry leader
in marketing
resources
you target a
smaller aspect of
that industry
leader’s business
establish a
foothold
greater chance of
success
Example
• Start up creates a portable music
player to rival the iPod
• Attacking Apple head on is impossible
• So plan an attack on a particular aspect
of the business
• Target an unloved demographic that is
being ignored by Apple’s marketing
department
• Establish yourself as the key leader of
portable music devices for that
unloved demographic
How to Battle
• Define the battle
• Can win with concentrated resources
• Very likely to win a small battle
• Could lead to eventual market dominance
• The most important aspect of the Lanchester Strategy is the need
for concentration
• Split your much larger opponent’s force into pieces
• Take on each piece separately
The Take Away
1. The essence of New Lanchester Strategy is “Divide and
Conquer”
2. Split the enemy force into multiple elements
3. Attack one part at a time
4. Its all about committing the maximum amount of your
resources against the minimum amount of your enemy
Any Questions?
Thank you
for your
time

More Related Content

What's hot

Competing for the future
Competing for the futureCompeting for the future
Competing for the future
Catherine Wu
 
Moonpig presentation
Moonpig presentationMoonpig presentation
Moonpig presentation
oddlefty
 
Sarah sobieski | The Basics Of Private Equity
Sarah sobieski | The Basics Of Private EquitySarah sobieski | The Basics Of Private Equity
Sarah sobieski | The Basics Of Private Equity
Premier Capital Partners
 
Business exit strategy presentation
Business exit strategy presentationBusiness exit strategy presentation
Business exit strategy presentation
Anirban Chakraborty
 
Applying the vrio framework
Applying the vrio frameworkApplying the vrio framework
Applying the vrio framework
izwan90
 
Corporate strategy and parenting theory
Corporate strategy and parenting theoryCorporate strategy and parenting theory
Corporate strategy and parenting theory
EnzoGorlomi
 

What's hot (20)

role of lbo and its uses
role of lbo and its usesrole of lbo and its uses
role of lbo and its uses
 
Venture Capital and the Finance of Innovation 2nd Edition Metrick Solutions M...
Venture Capital and the Finance of Innovation 2nd Edition Metrick Solutions M...Venture Capital and the Finance of Innovation 2nd Edition Metrick Solutions M...
Venture Capital and the Finance of Innovation 2nd Edition Metrick Solutions M...
 
Competing for the future
Competing for the futureCompeting for the future
Competing for the future
 
Hedgeable Company One Pager
Hedgeable Company One PagerHedgeable Company One Pager
Hedgeable Company One Pager
 
Moonpig presentation
Moonpig presentationMoonpig presentation
Moonpig presentation
 
Case study snap
Case study snapCase study snap
Case study snap
 
CORPORATE LEVEL STRATEGY
CORPORATE LEVEL STRATEGYCORPORATE LEVEL STRATEGY
CORPORATE LEVEL STRATEGY
 
Sarah sobieski | The Basics Of Private Equity
Sarah sobieski | The Basics Of Private EquitySarah sobieski | The Basics Of Private Equity
Sarah sobieski | The Basics Of Private Equity
 
Business exit strategy presentation
Business exit strategy presentationBusiness exit strategy presentation
Business exit strategy presentation
 
Business Growth
Business GrowthBusiness Growth
Business Growth
 
Mckinsey
MckinseyMckinsey
Mckinsey
 
Doing Business in Ireland
Doing Business in IrelandDoing Business in Ireland
Doing Business in Ireland
 
Applying the vrio framework
Applying the vrio frameworkApplying the vrio framework
Applying the vrio framework
 
GE presentation assignment 1
GE presentation assignment 1GE presentation assignment 1
GE presentation assignment 1
 
Startup Ideas and Validation
Startup Ideas and ValidationStartup Ideas and Validation
Startup Ideas and Validation
 
The Mckinsey Way Book Summary by Dr.N.Asokan
The Mckinsey Way Book Summary by Dr.N.AsokanThe Mckinsey Way Book Summary by Dr.N.Asokan
The Mckinsey Way Book Summary by Dr.N.Asokan
 
Supercharge your Investments with Tax-Loss Harvesting
Supercharge your Investments with Tax-Loss HarvestingSupercharge your Investments with Tax-Loss Harvesting
Supercharge your Investments with Tax-Loss Harvesting
 
Corporate strategy and parenting theory
Corporate strategy and parenting theoryCorporate strategy and parenting theory
Corporate strategy and parenting theory
 
Competitive Intelligence - Comparing Corporate Innovation Practices
Competitive Intelligence - Comparing Corporate Innovation PracticesCompetitive Intelligence - Comparing Corporate Innovation Practices
Competitive Intelligence - Comparing Corporate Innovation Practices
 
Delivering Outstanding VC Results with DA
Delivering Outstanding VC Results with DADelivering Outstanding VC Results with DA
Delivering Outstanding VC Results with DA
 

Viewers also liked (6)

New Approach To Consumer Theory[1]
New Approach To Consumer Theory[1]New Approach To Consumer Theory[1]
New Approach To Consumer Theory[1]
 
Dessecting World of Tanks
Dessecting World of TanksDessecting World of Tanks
Dessecting World of Tanks
 
戦略的に考えてみよう- Strategic Way of Thinking for your Work and Life
戦略的に考えてみよう- Strategic Way of Thinking for your Work and Life戦略的に考えてみよう- Strategic Way of Thinking for your Work and Life
戦略的に考えてみよう- Strategic Way of Thinking for your Work and Life
 
Introduction to mathematical modelling
Introduction to mathematical modellingIntroduction to mathematical modelling
Introduction to mathematical modelling
 
Customer Development at Startup2Startup
Customer Development at Startup2StartupCustomer Development at Startup2Startup
Customer Development at Startup2Startup
 
Strategic Management: Types of Strategy
Strategic Management: Types of StrategyStrategic Management: Types of Strategy
Strategic Management: Types of Strategy
 

The New Lanchester Strategy

  • 1. The New Lanchester Strategy Building a successful start up and fighting military battles have many of the same qualities
  • 2. What does it imply? • Founding a start up is not for the feint of heart, much like leading an army • Takes vision, determination and a confidence to continue with your instinct in the face of adversity
  • 3. The New Lanchester Strategy • Takes it’s name from the English engineer, Fred W Lanchester • He observed that size advantage on one side is the square of the number of units in in the force • Therefore, two opposing armies go to battle, one with a 2-to-1 advantage, the firepower of the bigger army is quadrupled thus inflicting four times the punishment • So, concentrate your smaller force to attach to a single point of an enemy • Once that battle is won, move onto the next small chunk with your concentrated force and resources can overcome • Theory based on the really old battle strategy of ‘Divide and Conquer’
  • 4. The theory behind the New Lanchester Strategy • How much “fire power” will it take to beat an enemy? • How can concentrating forces into a smaller portion of an enemy be a better strategy for victory Small Army Small Firepower Small Force
  • 5. Case studies • Many prominent cases in history where a smaller force in sheer numbers has defeated a much larger army • Two such examples are the Battle of Thermopylae and the Battle of Trafalgar
  • 6. Battle of Thermopylae • Fought by the allied Greek states in 480 BC lead by King Leonidas of Sparta (The 300) against Persian Empire of Xerxes. • King Leonidas’ strategy was to defend the only passage way in • Concentrated the battle at a single point • Not have his inferior army flanked by the Persians
  • 7. Battle of Trafalgar • Lord Nelson fought the Battle of Trafalgar in 1805, facing the combined fleets of France and Spain with his numerically inferior force • Split the superior enemy fleet into two • Decisive concentration of force to the rear of the Franco-Spanish fleet • Franco-Spanish fleet lost twenty-two ships, without a single British vessel being lost.
  • 8. Canon and Xerox • Utilized a similar "battle" strategy in their conquest of Xerox • Overwhelming rival in Rank Xerox • Took a foothold in the market by first concentrating its resources in Scotland • Achieved a 40% market share • Attacked selected and tightly defined regions in England • Invested more and more in product development and sales resource • Final push into the lucrative London market • Superior product and a numerically superior sales force. Rank Xerox didn’t stand a chance Check Locate Conquer Expand
  • 9. The New Lanchester Strategy in Business • Transitioned into the corporate world for companies that are looking to enter existing markets • For a small company looking to take on the incumbents • For a new start up looking to formulate a battle plan
  • 10. Market Analysis If a single company has 74% of the market, the market has become an effective monopoly. For a start up, that’s an unassailable position for a head-on assault. (think Microsoft)
  • 11. Market Analysis If the biggest player in a market has at least a 26% market share, the market is unstable, with a strong possibility of abrupt shifts in the company rankings. Here there may be some entry opportunities
  • 12. Market Analysis If the biggest player has less than 26% market share, it has no real impact in influencing the market. Start ups who want to enter an existing market find these the easiest to penetrate.
  • 13. Rules Deducted attacking a company that holds a monopoly head-on is suicide. no start up has enough cash to out spend an industry leader in marketing resources you target a smaller aspect of that industry leader’s business establish a foothold greater chance of success
  • 14. Example • Start up creates a portable music player to rival the iPod • Attacking Apple head on is impossible • So plan an attack on a particular aspect of the business • Target an unloved demographic that is being ignored by Apple’s marketing department • Establish yourself as the key leader of portable music devices for that unloved demographic
  • 15. How to Battle • Define the battle • Can win with concentrated resources • Very likely to win a small battle • Could lead to eventual market dominance • The most important aspect of the Lanchester Strategy is the need for concentration • Split your much larger opponent’s force into pieces • Take on each piece separately
  • 16. The Take Away 1. The essence of New Lanchester Strategy is “Divide and Conquer” 2. Split the enemy force into multiple elements 3. Attack one part at a time 4. Its all about committing the maximum amount of your resources against the minimum amount of your enemy