Worst case re: Trump 2020, via UPenn criminologist, Mary Trump et al: President’s one of ~77 million psychopaths imperiled (PsIMP) by advances in molecular genetics; he knows PsIMP; ...

Worst case re: Trump 2020, via UPenn criminologist1
, Mary
Trump, et al.: President’s one of ~77 million psychopaths
imperiled (PsIMP) by advances in molecular genetics; he knows
PsIMP; he’s part of Ps’ resistance, which: 1) he wants to
ADVANCE by granting himself unprecedented emergency
powers, 2) includes (many of) the many Ps in law enforcement
(e.g., DHS-ers); Ps have been seeking/designing pretexts for
said granting (e.g., seeking via Portland kidnappings, police
riots; designing a variant of Operation Northwoods).
1
Download pdf for clickable links on pages 1-3. #SlideShareBug
Summary (13 pages; details follow)
From said UPenn-er’s 2013 book: PsIMP via said advances. Keywords: “indefinite
detention” by 2034 (e.g., Ps who haven’t committed a crime would be imprisoned).
From a 2020 article in Nature magazine: “In the past decade, studies of psycho-
pathological genetics have become large enough to draw robust conclusions.”
From the 2020 book by Mary Trump, the clinical psychologist (Ph.D.) who’s the
president’s niece: “A case could be made that he [Trump] also meets the criteria for
antisocial personality disorder, which in its most severe form is generally consider-
ed sociopathy.” From the 2018 article on PsychologyToday.com titled “The
Differences Between Psychopaths and Sociopaths”: “Many psychiatrists, forensic
psychologists, criminologists, and police officers . . . use the terms sociopath and
psychopath interchangeably.”
From a 2019 article in The Atlantic by a co-director of the Brennan Center at NYU
Law School (4 excerpts): “The moment the president declares a ‘national
emergency’—a decision that is entirely within his discretion—he is able to set
aside many of the legal limits on his authority.”; “From seizing control of the

internet to declaring martial law, President Trump may legally do all kinds of
extraordinary things.”; “[W]hat if a president, backed into a corner and facing
electoral defeat or impeachment, were to declare an emergency for the sake of
holding on to power? In that scenario, our laws and institutions might not save us
from a presidential power grab. They might be what takes us down.”; “[P]residents
have explored the outer limits of their constitutional emergency authority in a
series of directives known as Presidential Emergency Action Documents
[PEADs].” From an August 2020 article on CBSnews.com: “PEADs undergo
periodic revision. And we know that the Department of Justice is in the middle of
one of these periodic reviews and revisions. So, we have to imagine what the
Trump administration might be doing with these documents and what authorities
this administration might be trying to give itself.”
From a 2018 article on BusinessInsider.com: “[L]aw enforcement is a popular
career choice for psychopaths.” From the June 2020 article on WPXI.com1
titled
“Former FBI assistant director: Derek Chauvin showed ‘sociopathic behavior’
during George Floyd’s death”: “[Former FBI-er] Fuentes said research shows about
seven percent of people exhibit some sociopathic behavior, but in applicants for
law enforcement that number jumps up to more than 40% [my emphasis].”
1
WPXI is the NBC-TV affiliate in Pittsburgh, PA.
From 2001 book Body of Secrets: Anatomy of the Ultra-Secret National Security
Agency, by James Bamford: “Codenamed Operation Northwoods, the [U.S.
military’s 1962] plan, which had the written approval of the Chairman and every
member of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, called for innocent people to be shot on
American streets; for boats carrying refugees fleeing Cuba to be sunk on the high
seas; for a wave of violent terrorism to be launched in Washington, D.C., Miami,
and elsewhere. People would be framed for bombings they did not commit; planes
would be hijacked.”
It’s (very) likely that a growing number of Ps: 1) are aware that PsIMP, 2) have
been resisting. In particular, there are indicators that:

● Ps have been attempting to weaponize life science in two specific ways that
are ideal for “asymmetric warfare”
● Ps’ attempts have been funded/enabled via: 1) the de facto legalization of
huge fraud in America, 2) Deutsche Bank (DB), 3+) . . .
● Ps’ resisting has turned DB into a next-gen variant of the defunct, wildly
violent, politically influential/coercive, worldwide criminal enterprise of the
1980s known as Bank of Credit and Commerce International (BCCI)1
1
From 2020 book Dark Towers: Deutsche Bank, Donald Trump and an Epic Trail
of Destruction, by the finance editor of The New York Times:
To any government official paying attention [in 2017], this was a powerful
signal: Investigate Deutsche and risk the president’s wrath.
From 1993 book The Outlaw Bank: A Wild Ride into the Secret Heart of BCCI, co-
authored by two journalists who covered BCCI for Time magazine (my emphases):
Perhaps the most disturbing aspect of the BCCI affair in the United States
was the failure of U.S. government and federal law enforcement to move
against the outlaw bank. Instead of swift retribution, what took place over
more than a decade was a cover-up of major, alarming proportions, often
orchestrated from the very highest levels of government.
Much more below re: DB and BCCI.
Worst-case for non-Ps
Said attempts to weaponize life science have yielded weapons, and are ongoing.
Ps believe the coming months are the ideal time to maximize their resistance.
Reason 1 of 4:
A big threat to Ps is counter-resistance by very wealthy people who aren’t Ps

(VWPnPs).
It’s very likely1
that (almost) all VWPnPs have been committing a variant of
the “category error” made in the 1930s by Neville Chamberlain et al. that led
to World War II (55 million killed). From 2008 book The Wages of
Destruction: The Making and Breaking of the Nazi Economy, by Columbia
University historian Adam Tooze:
Hitler had seen himself as locked in a global confrontation with world
Jewry.
. . . For Hitler, a war of conquest was not one policy option amongst
others. Either the German race struggled for Lebensraum [i.e.,
territory] or its racial enemies would condemn it to extinction.
From 2019 book Appeasement: Chamberlain, Hitler, Churchill, and the
Road to War:
The failure to perceive the true character of the Nazi regime and Adolf
Hitler stands as the single greatest failure of British policy makers
during this period, since it was from this that all subsequent failures—
the failure to rearm sufficiently, the failure to build alliances (not least
with the Soviet Union), the failure to project British power, and the
failure to educate public opinion—stemmed.
Going forward, it’s likely that a growing number of VWPnPs (e.g., many/
most of America’s de facto policy-makers) will: 1) become aware that
PsIMP, 2) counter-resist.
1
Details below. Keywords: my experiences since 2016 with U.S. govern-
ment agencies.
Reason 2:

Another big threat to Ps is counter-resistance by many/most U.S. adults who
aren’t members of the military (e.g., voters in elections for public office).
Precedents suggest this counter-resistance could be prevented/subdued via
Ps’ weaponizing of life science. From the 2018 article titled “Los
Extraditables, the Pablo Escobar-Led Gang That Launched a Bloody
Campaign [during the 1980s] Against U.S. Extradition”:
The terrorist group . . . claimed “we prefer a grave in Colombia to a
prison in the United States . . .”
Escobar was a drug-trafficker whose net worth reached $58 billion (in 2018
dollars). The other leaders of Los Extraditables were wealthy drug-
traffickers.
From 2001 book Killing Pablo: The Hunt for the World’s Greatest Outlaw
(my emphases):
“[Escobar] intended, he said, to use the public’s weariness with
[Extraditables-funded] violence to his benefit. He planned to turn up
the violence until the public cried out for a solution, a deal.
. . . A communiqué from the Extraditables not long after hammered
home the point:
We are declaring total and absolute war on the government,
on the individual and political oligarchy, on the journalists who
have attacked and insulted us, on the judges that have sold
themselves to the government, on the extraditing magistrates
. . . on all those who have persecuted and attacked us. We will
not respect the families of those who have not respected our
families. We will burn and destroy the industries, properties and
mansions of the oligarchy.”

“At his [Pablo’s] peak, he would threaten to usurp the Colombian
State.”
“Ever since Pablo’s men had blown that Avianca flight out of the sky
. . .”
“[A] total of 457 police had been killed since Colonel Martinez had
started his hunt. Young gunmen in that city were being paid 5 million
pesos for killing a cop.”
From 1998 book Guns, Germs and Steel: The Fate of Human Societies, for
which the author received a Pulitzer Prize:
When [Spanish conquistador] Pizarro and [Inca emperor] Atahuallpa
met [in 1532] at Cajamarca [in Peru], why did Pizarro capture
Atahuallpa and kill so many of his followers, instead of Atahuallpa’s
vastly more numerous forces capturing and killing Pizarro? After all,
Pizarro had only 62 soldiers mounted on horses, along with 106 foot
soldiers, while Atahuallpa commanded an army of about 80,000.
. . . Pizarro’s military advantages lay in the Spaniards’ steel swords
and other weapons, steel armor, guns, and horses. To those weapons,
Atahuallpa’s troops, without animals on which to ride into battle,
could oppose only stone, bronze, or wooden clubs, maces, and hand
axes, plus slingshots and quilted armor.
Reason 3:
The biggest threat to Ps worldwide is counter-resistance by the U.S. military
and U.S intelligence agencies.
This threat to Ps is REDUCED while a P is commander-in-chief (i.e., worst
case, President TrumP . . .)1
. Keywords: appointees/hires who are Ps, their

Rolodexes2
, their contacts’ Rolodexes . . .
A non-P might be elected president of the U.S. in November 2020.
1
From 2020 book Too Much and Never Enough: How My Family Created
the World's Most Dangerous Man, by Mary Trump:
“A case could be made that he [Trump] also meets the criteria for
antisocial personality disorder, which in its most severe form is
generally considered sociopathy[1.1
] but can also refer to chronic
criminality, arrogance, and disregard for the rights of others. Is there
comorbidity? Probably.”
“I received my PhD in clinical psychology from the Derner Institute
of Advanced Psychological Studies, and while doing research for my
dissertation I spent a year working on the admissions ward of
Manhattan Psychiatric Center, a state facility, where we diagnosed,
evaluated, and treated some of the sickest, most vulnerable patients. In
addition to teaching graduate psychology, including courses in trauma,
psychopathology, and developmental psychology, for several years as
an adjunct professor, I provided therapy and psychological testing for
patients at a community clinic specializing in addictions.”
1.1
From the 2018 article on PsychologyToday.com titled “The Differences
Between Psychopaths and Sociopaths”:
Leading experts also disagree on the meaningful differences between
the two conditions—and those who agree that there are differences
often disagree on what those differences are.
2
From 2020 book Hiding in Plain Sight: The Invention of Donald Trump
and the Erosion of America:

In March 2016, Trump hired Paul Manafort as his campaign adviser.
. . . In the 1980s and 1990s, Manafort and Roger Stone—another old
Trump friend and presidential campaign adviser—partnered in a D.C.
firm nicknamed “the torturers’ lobby” because their clients included
the most brutal dictators in the world.
Summary of reason 4 (details below; again, this is a hypothetical worst-case for
non-Ps):
Many years before Trump’s presidency, Ps started gaining A LOT of
political influence (PI) in the U.S., in part because:
● Ps have been willing to gain PI and judicial influence1
(JI) illegally (as
well as legally)
● BCCI provided Ps with a playbook/template for leveraging huge fraud
to gain PI/JI illegally
As indicators suggest, Ps’ bribes and/or coercion have helped to place Ps in
government jobs that give the employees the ability to prevent/sabotage
(some) counter-resistance by non-Ps.
1
From Hiding in Plain Sight:
Manafort’s criminal history was so expansive he was initially set to
potentially face over three hundred years in prison15
—until the judge
in his [2017] case, T. S. Ellis, was threatened to the point that he had
to be protected by US Marshals.16
Ellis said that the jury was also
receiving threats. He refused to make their names public, saying he
feared for their safety.17
Despite the threats, Manafort’s trial led to a
conviction, which Manafort then attempted to circumvent through a
plea deal with Mueller—a deal that he broke. At Manafort’s
sentencing months later, Ellis shocked the country by proclaiming
Manafort—now well known by Americans as a crime machine—a

man who had led an “otherwise blameless life.” He reduced his
sentence to below the recommended guidelines, prompting a series of
ethics inquiries that were later dismissed.18
No one followed up on the
threats to Ellis—a frightening pattern that played out with many who
attempted to hold the Trump team accountable.
Title of a July 2020 article in Newsweek:
Judge Esther Salas Assigned to [Jeffrey] Epstein Deutsche Bank Case
4 Days Before Husband, Son Shot
From 2020 book On Corruption in America—And What Is at Stake:
[E]verywhere, I have found one [government function] that
kleptocratic networks must control: the justice function.
The author of On Corruption served as special assistant to the top U.S.
military officer, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Admiral Mike Mullen.
She participated in Cabinet-level decision-making on Afghanistan, Pakistan
and the Arab Spring. Previously, she was a special advisor to two
commanders of the international troops in Afghanistan (ISAF), Generals
David McKiernan and Stanley McChrystal. Her 2015 book is Thieves of
State: Why Corruption Threatens Global Security.
Toward maximizing their resistance, Ps want pretexts:
● for escalating their resistance
● that help to delay/prevent counter-resistance
So . . . tactics that have a high likelihood of yielding pretexts . . . DHS/police
provocations (e.g., violence)1
. . .
1
From 2011 book The Psychopath Test: A Journey Through the Madness Industry:

[“]She said, ‘I’ve got a bad personality. I like to hurt people.’ I thought she
was winding me up. I said, ‘Okay, fine.’ So we went through the [fMRI]
tests [i.e., brain scans]. When she was looking at the photographs of the
mutilated bodies, the sensors showed that she was getting a kick off of them.
Her sexual reward center—it’s a sexual thing—was fired up by blood
and death [my emphasis]. It’s subconscious. It happens in milliseconds. She
found those things pleasant.”
From 2019 book The New Evil: Understanding the Emergence of Modern Violent
Crime:
As we move along the continuum to Category 9 [of 22 categories of violent
crime], we traverse an important threshold. The remainder of the scale
encompasses persons who commit “evil” acts partly or wholly as the result
of varying degrees of psychopathy . . .
TNE co-author Michael H. Stone, MD, is a professor of clinical psychiatry at the
Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons.
TNE co-author Gary Brucato, PhD, is: 1) a clinical psychologist and researcher in
the areas of violence, psychosis, and other serious psychopathology, 2) the assistant
director of the Center of Prevention and Evaluation at the New York State
Psychiatric Institute/Columbia University Medical Center.
Worst case for me
Summary (some details follow; more below)
To ADVANCE non-Ps’ counter-resistance, I’ll pay out 84% of my ownership stake
in the startup that’ll result from my Amazon-/Microsoft-/VC-praised1
plan to
establish the most popular online market for artificial intelligence and customized
education (e.g., CE for AI, which almost certainly will be to the AI economy what
oil has been to the industrial economy).

1
Links to the praise are on pages 12 & 13 below, along with excerpts.
Keywords re: “pay out”: 20% finders’-fee (e.g., paid to you, and someone in your
Rolodex, and . . .).
Keywords re: my plan: said praise was for 1998 and 2004 versions; current version
is a product of my efforts since 2005 to make my business model disruptive to
Amazon, Microsoft, etc.; from mid-2016 to mid-2019 my primary focus was
updating/adapting my work (e.g., updating my innovation that’s designed to
disrupt; adapting my Amazon-/VC-praised design of a next-gen variant of
LinkedIn) to yield an IDEAL front company for gathering (anticipatory)
intelligence re: threats posed by PsIMP (e.g., threats to many thousands of non-Ps
who’ll expedite PsIMP by being the most valuable of the AI-CE industry’s
customers, entrepreneurs and employees1
).
1
Re: “who’ll expedite”: Details below. Re: the business case for my work on said
front company (i.e., on helping to protect said “most valuable”): Warren Buffett is
a longtime investor in many insurance companies; from Buffett’s 2016 annual
letter to shareholders:
It would be foolish, however, for me or anyone to demand 100% proof of
huge forthcoming damage to the world if that outcome seemed at all
possible and if prompt action had even a small chance of thwarting the
danger.
Corollary: Many/most/all of said “most valuable” might favor the company that’s
the sole/leading provider of PsIMP-insurance.
Keywords re: “finder’s-fee”: 64% of my ownership stake to the U.S. president who
delegates powers (e.g., emergency, war)1
.
1
From 2018 book Presidents of War: The Epic Story, From 1807 to Modern
Times:

[This book] shows how [U.S.] Presidents of war have dealt with political
power under the Constitution. . . . [T]he Founders gave Congress the sole
power to declare war, and divided the responsibility to wage war between
the executive and legislative branches. . . .
. . . [D]uring the past two centuries, Presidents, step by step, have disrupted
the Founders’ design. . . . [T]hey have seized for themselves the power to
launch large conflicts . . . [T]he last time a President asked Congress to
declare war was 1942. . . . [T]he life or death of much of the human race
has now come to depend on the character of the single person who
happens to be the President of the United States [my emphasis].
Re: President Trump might delegate in exchange for 64% of the Amazon of AI &
CE
From Hiding in Plain Sight:
Trump’s mentor, [Roy] Cohn . . . took Trump under his wing in 1973 . . .
Trump and Cohn would call each other fifteen to twenty times a day. They
were inseparable in New York work and nightlife . . .
Roy Cohn died of complications from AIDS in 1986. Trump, true to form,
abandoned Cohn when he fell ill, prompting Cohn to proclaim in an
interview with Barrett that Trump “pisses ice water.”
Re: said praise for my pre-2005 work
From a 2004 email sent to me by Amazon.com’s first Director of Personalization:
Frank, I just spent about an hour surfing around your website with a bit of
amazement. I run a [now defunct] little company [funded entirely by
Amazon] . . . We are a team of folks who worked together at Amazon.com

developing that company’s personalization and recommendations team and
systems. We spent about 1.5 years thinking about what we wanted to build
next. We thought a lot about online education tools. We thought a lot about
classified ads and job networks. We thought a lot about reputation systems.
We thought a bit about personalized advertising systems. We thought a lot
about blogging and social networking systems. . . . I guess I’m mostly just
fascinated that we’ve been working a very similar vein to the one you
describe, without having a solid name for it (we call it “the age of the
amateur” or “networks of shared experiences” instead of CLLCS [i.e.,
customized lifelong learning and career services], but believe me, we are
talking about the same patterns and markets, if not in exactly the same way).
Thanks for sharing what you have—it’s fascinating stuff.
From a 2004 email sent to me by an analyst at then top VC firm Draper Fisher
Jurvetson:
Hi Frank, Thanks for your time today. If you would like to provide us with
further information about your [business] plan [for providing CLLCS], we
would be happy to review it in more detail.
From a 1998 email sent to me by the then Manager of the Learning Sciences and
Technology Group at Microsoft Research:
Frank, you are a good man. Have you thought about joining this team? Your
only alternative, of course, is venture capital. But their usual models require
getting rid of the “originator” within the first eighteen months.
Re: PsIMP
Summary (details follow)
Psychopathy is ~70% heritable.

Via molecular genetics, many/most/all genetic markers for psychopathy will be
identified soon.
Again, “indefinite detention” of Ps could/should ensue, according to said 2013
book by said criminologist who’s tenured at the University of Pennsylvania.
Re: psychopathy is ~70% heritable
From 2011 book The Science of Evil, by a University of Cambridge professor of
developmental psychopathology:
If a trait or behavior is even partly genetic, we should see its signature
showing up in twins.
. . . Regarding twin studies of Type P [i.e., psychopaths], none of these show
100 percent heritability, but the genetic component is nevertheless
substantial (the largest estimate being about 70 percent).
From Too Much and Never Enough: How My Family Created the World's Most
Dangerous Man:
[President Trump’s father] Fred seemed to have no emotional needs at all. In
fact, he was a high-functioning sociopath.
Re: many/most/all genetic markers of said ~70% will be identified soon
From 2013 book The Anatomy of Violence: The Biological Roots of Crime, by said
UPenn criminologist:
“Behavioral genetics is a shadowy black box because, while it tells us what
proportion of a given behavior is genetically influenced, it does not identify
the specific genes lurking in there that predispose one to violence. Molecular
genetics is poised to pry open that black box . . .”

“Twenty years ago, molecular genetics was a fledgling field of research.
Now it is a major enterprise providing us with a detailed look at the structure
and function of genes.”
“The essence of the molecular genetic research we have been touching on
above—identifying specific genes that predispose individuals to crime—is
that genes code for neurotransmitter functioning. Neurotransmitters are
brain chemicals essential to brain functioning. There are more than a
hundred of them and they help to transmit signals from one brain cell to
another to communicate information. Change the level of these neuro-
transmitters, and you change cognition, emotion, and behavior.
. . . It’s 2034 . . . [A]ll males in society aged eighteen and over have to
register at their local hospital for a quick brain scan and DNA testing. One
simple finger prick for one drop of blood that takes ten seconds. Then a
five-minute brain scan for the “Fundamental Five Functions”: First, a
structural scan provides the brain’s anatomy. Second, a functional scan
shows resting brain activity. Third, enhanced diffusion-tensor imaging is
taken to assess the integrity of the white-fiber system in the brain, assessing
intricate brain connectivity. Fourth is a reading of the brain’s neurochem-
istry that has been developed from magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Fifth
and finally, the cellular functional scan assesses expression of 23,000
different genes at the cellular level. The computerization of all medical,
school, psychological, census, and neighborhood data makes it easy to
combine these traditional risk variables alongside the vast amount of DNA
and brain data to form an all-encompassing biosocial data set.
. . . Fourth-generation machine-learning techniques looked for complex
patterns of linear and nonlinear relationships . . . ”
Re: “indefinite detention” of Ps could/should ensue
From The Anatomy of Violence: The Biological Roots of Crime (my emphases):

It’s 2034 . . . The economic cost of crime is now astronomical. Back in 2010,
the cost of homicide in the United States was estimated at over $300 billion
—more than the combined budgets of the Departments of Education, Justice,
Housing and Urban Development, Health and Human Services, Labor, and
Homeland Security. Way back in 1999, it was estimated to consume 11.9
percent of GDP, but in 2034 it is gobbling up 21.8 percent.
. . . [This] leads the government to launch the LOMBROSO program—
Legal Offensive on Murder: Brain Research Operation for the Screening of
Offenders.
. . . Under LOMBROSO, those who test positive—the LPs—are held in
indefinite detention. . . . It sounds quite cushy, but remember that the LPs
have not actually committed a crime. Perhaps the main drawback is who
they live with, housed as they are in facilities full of other LPs—time
bombs waiting to explode.
Re: it’s (very) likely that a growing number of Ps are aware that PsIMP
From a 2016 article on PsychologyToday.com:
A [meta-analytic] review of [48] studies found that the correlation between
psychopathy and intelligence is nearly zero [i.e., ~2.3% of Ps have an IQ ≥
130; ~16% ≥ 115] . . . (O’Boyle, Forsyth, Banks, & Story, 2013).
From the 2012 article in FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin titled “The Corporate
Psychopath”:
Today’s corporate psychopath may be highly educated—several with Ph.D.,
M.D., and J.D. degrees have been studied . . .
Re: indicators that Ps have been attempting to weaponize life science in two
specific ways

There are indicators that Deutsche Bank (DB):
● employs many Ps
● has been involved in both ways of weaponizing . . .
Re: indicators that DB employs . . .
From a 2011 article in U.K. newspaper The Independent:
My companion, a senior UK investment banker and I, are discussing the
most successful banking types we know and what makes them tick. I argue
that they often conform to the characteristics displayed by social psycho-
paths. To my surprise, my friend agrees.
He then makes an astonishing confession: “At one major investment bank
for which I worked, we used psychometric testing to recruit social psycho-
paths because their characteristics exactly suited them to senior corporate
finance roles.”
From Dark Towers: Deutsche Bank, Donald Trump and an Epic Trail of
Destruction (my emphases):
“Deutsche . . . helped funnel money into countries that were under
economic sanctions for pursuing nuclear weapons or participating in
genocides.”
“The hundreds of millions of dollars that Deutsche [had] wired to Iranian
banks [by 2006] provided vital funding for the sanctioned country to pay for
its terrorism. Soon Iraq was being ripped apart by violence. Roadside
bombs detonated all over the country, targeting the country’s fragile
government and the U.S. military forces that were trying to keep the peace.

Much of the violence was the work of a terrorist group, Jaysh al-Mahdi,
which had been armed and trained by Hezbollah, which had been bankrolled
by Iran’s Revolutionary Guard, which had been financed by Deutsche.
. . . The sanctions violations weren’t the work of an isolated crew of rogue
Deutsche employees. Managers knew. Their bosses knew. American
regulators would later find evidence that at least one member of the bank’s
vorstand—in other words, one of Deutsche’s most senior executives—
knew about and approved of the scheme.”
“[Deutsche] would soon become enveloped in scandals related to money
laundering, tax evasion, manipulating interest rates, manipulating the prices
of precious metals, manipulating the currencies markets, bribing foreign
officials, accounting fraud, violating international sanctions, ripping off
customers, and ripping off the German, British, and United States
governments. (The list went on.)”
From a 2019 article on CNBC.com:
According to a study dating back to 2010, there were at least three times as
many psychopaths in executive or CEO roles than in the overall population.
But more recent data found it’s now a much higher figure: 20 percent.
Re: the first of said ways of weaponizing life science
From the chapter in 2015 book Tomorrowland: Our Journey from Science Fiction
to Science Fact titled “Hacking the President’s DNA” (the chapter was co-authored
by a former Resident Futurist of the FBI; my emphases):
Our next commander-in-chief will be our first commander-in-chief to have
to deal with genetically based, made-to-order [e.g., personalized]
biothreats.

. . . Within a few years, politicians, celebrities, leaders of industry . . . will
be vulnerable to murder[, extortion, etc.] by genetically engineered
bioweapon. Many such killings could go undetected, confused with death by
natural causes; many others would be difficult to pin on a defendant,
especially given disease latency. Both of these factors are likely to make
personalized bioweapons extremely attractive to anyone bearing ill will.
Indicators of DB’s involvement in the development and deployment of
personalized bioweapons (DDPB)
It’s (somewhat) likely that Jeffrey Epstein was involved in DDPB.
It’s (very) likely that Epstein was a P.
DB was Epstein’s bank.
Re: Epstein & DDPB
A prerequisite for maximizing yield from DDPB is linking financial data and DNA
data.
From a 2020 article in The New York Times:
In the years after Jeffrey Epstein registered as a sex offender [i.e., after
2008], he . . . started a business to develop algorithms and mine DNA and
financial databases.
. . . Southern Trust [i.e., said business] generated about $300 million in profit
in six years . . . The source of Southern Trust’s revenue is not clear; the bare-
bones corporate filings made by the company in the Virgin Islands do not list
any clients.

For Epstein, leveraging DDPB to coerce/extort might’ve been a next-gen variant of
his longtime modus operandi.
From the August 2019 article in The New York Times titled “The Day Jeffrey
Epstein Told Me He Had Dirt on Powerful People”:
The overriding impression I took away from our roughly 90-minute
conversation was that Mr. Epstein knew an astonishing number of rich,
famous and powerful people, and had photos to prove it. He also claimed to
know a great deal about these people, some of it potentially damaging or
embarrassing, including details about their supposed sexual proclivities and
recreational drug use.
Re: it’s (very) likely that Epstein was a P
Hypersexuality correlates strongly with psychopathy.
From a 2012 article on HuffingtonPost.co.uk (my emphases):
“In one of the largest studies of its kind ever published, U.S. psychologists
have found a particular aspect of personality in men and women predicts
what the researchers refer to as ‘hypersexuality.’
. . . This character trait is—psychopathy.”
“Psychologists are beginning to concur that it’s this unique element of
character which most powerfully predicts . . . a gamut of risky sexual
behaviors.”
“The ‘hypersexual’ have more sexual partners than the rest of the
population, fantasize more . . . and tend to favor more sex without love.”
Re: DB & Epstein

Title of a December 2019 article on TruePundit.com:
Jeffrey Epstein’s Private Banker at Deutsche & Citi Found Swinging From a
Rope; Executive “Suicide” Before FBI Questioned Him
Title of a 2019 article in Vanity Fair:
Of Course Jeff Epstein Moved His Dirty Money Through Deutsche Bank
From said 2020 article in The New York Times:
In the years after Jeffrey Epstein registered as a sex offender [i.e., after
2008], he . . . set up a bank [EB].
It’s at least likely that:
● EB banked Southern Trust
● DB banked EB
From said 2020 article in The New York Times (my emphasis):
The Federal Reserve Bank of New York describes international bank entities
in the Virgin Islands and Puerto Rico [e.g., EB] as “high-risk” institutions.
Last year, it temporarily suspended applications for them to obtain financial
services from the Fed until it can issue stricter rules for them.
From Dark Towers (my emphasis):
Deutsche had been moving money—as much as $80 billion—for thousands
of “high-risk entities” in various countries.
Re: the second of said ways of weaponizing life science

From the March 2020 op-ed on TheHill.com titled “The coronavirus: Blueprint for
bioterrorism,” written by a former assistant to a then vice-president of the U.S.:
It represents the perfect asymmetric warfare strategy . . .
From the 2018 article on Vice.com titled “This Is What It Would Take to Turn a
Virus Into a Weapon”:
Melinda Gates recently declared that the biggest threat to humanity is a
pandemic brought on by a bioterrorist attack. [The Melinda & Bill Gates
Foundation has been focused on pandemic preparation for several years.]
Nobel laureate virologist in April 2020: “[The novel coronavirus] could only have
been created in a lab.”
IMPORTANTLY, Ps could ENLARGE their war chest by engineering
(corona)viruses and vaccines.
From 2020 “pandemic novel” The End of October (#24 on Amazon’s May 7 list of
best-selling books; the novel was published on April 28):
“Really, Henry,” Bartlett asked, “you think this [virus] was man-made?”
“Biowarfare has always been a part of the arsenals of the great powers. We
shouldn’t be surprised if this turns out to have been concocted in a
laboratory. We know the Russians have tinkered with influenza. Good
scientists. Maybe they wanted to see what could be done, if there was some
way of collaborating with nature to build the ultimate weapon of war, one
that can destroy the enemy without fingerprints.”
“It only makes sense if they have also developed a vaccine,” said Bartlett
[my emphasis].

From the April 2020 article in The New Yorker titled “What Lawrence Wright
Learned From His Pandemic Novel”:
By the time Wright and I met for lunch and discussed his novel—“The End
of October,” which is out this month—he had already done the coast-to-
coast reporting. He had met with epidemiologists, immunologists,
microbiologists, security experts, vaccine experts, and public-health
officials. He had read all the books, all the journal articles.
. . . The experts, Wright notes in a letter to the reader in the galleys of his
book, “all share the concerns I’ve presented—that something like this could
happen.”
From The End of October:
“We know al-Qaeda has attempted to purchase bioweapons,” said Henry.
“And look at Aum Shinrikyo. They had microbiologists working with them,
scientists who would have been capable of editing genes if they had had the
technology we have today. We shouldn’t underestimate the ability of any
terrorist group to be able to manufacture novel viruses [my emphasis].”
From the May 1 review of The End of October in The New York Times:
What makes Lawrence Wright’s “The End of October” exceptional is the
same quality that elevated Defoe’s work: deep, thorough research. Wright is
the Pulitzer Prize-winning author of “The Looming Tower” and other
nonfiction books, and here he applies the magisterial force of his reporting
skills . . .
[M]uch of the book not only reads like nonfiction, it is nonfiction: Wright
weaves into the book accounts of historical epidemics, descriptions of
Russian cyber- and biowarfare capabilities . . .

. . . As Wright wrote in a recent letter to booksellers, “I am merely extending
trends I see in the world to certain logical conclusions.”
From 2017 book Warnings: How to Find Cassandras and Stop Catastrophes, co-
authored by a former U.S. National Coordinator for Security and Counter-
Terrorism (my emphases):
In 2011, Ron Fouchier, from the Erasmus Medical Center in downtown
Rotterdam, crafted a series of experiments to mutate highly lethal H5N1 into
a form contagious by air. Just five single mutations allowed H5N1 to bind
with cells in the human respiratory tract (thereby making it contagious by
air, sneezes, and dirty doorknobs, etc.). Using ferrets as incubators, and their
noses as makeshift Petri dishes, Fouchier rapidly moved infected sputum
from ferret to ferret. In a period of weeks, he created a bug as transmiss-
ible as the Spanish flu but potentially up to twenty times more lethal.
. . . Fouchier was roundly criticized for launching such a dangerous study in
a working hospital, in a crowded city, with arguably less than perfect
protections. He did it without complicated tools, available in nearly any
laboratory and to consumers. And he decided to publish his results to give
the world a step-by-step manual, steps that could be taken in nearly any
lab to make his superbug.
. . . No intelligence agency had ever heard of Aum Shinrikyo when it
released the chemical weapon sarin into the Tokyo subway in 1995,
killing thirteen and injuring fifty-four more. Their founder, Shoko Asahara,
sported a large Cheshire cat grin and a furry beard reminiscent of Jerry
Garcia’s; he had previously worked in a yoga studio as a massage and
acupuncture therapist. He also built the largest nonstate biological and
chemical weapons program ever seen.
From said op-ed titled “The coronavirus: Blueprint for bioterrorism”:

It also could be a huge money-maker for terrorists or other bad actors to pay
for future attacks. Anyone controlling the pace, location and impact of the
virus could short the markets in advance, and, literally, could have made
trillions of dollars over the past few weeks.
Re: Ps being able to test a would-be vaccine
At any given time, some/many Ps are living with a terminal diagnosis. For some of
these Ps, being infected with a Ps-made virus might impose little or no additional
downside. Ps can identify one another via psychometric testing (e.g., tests
administered via the pretext of screening job applicants).
Re: Ps being able to distribute/sell their vaccine(s)
See below.
Indicators of DB’s involvement in the weaponization of viruses
From George Church’s web page on the site for Harvard’s PhD Program in
Virology:
Virology Faculty Member . . .
From a 2019 article on NBCnews.com (my emphases):
Harvard science professors kept meeting with donor Jeffrey Epstein . . .
[A]ccording to the online personal calendar [for 2014] of Dr. George
Church, a renowned geneticist who holds professorships at Harvard,
Harvard Medical School and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology[:]
. . . On April 22, Epstein met with Church at the Harvard Medical School's
Genetics Department building . . . The two had a phone call the next day. He
had lunch with Church on June 21, according to the calendar. . . . On Sept.

12, Epstein and Church had another phone call, which was followed by a
teleconference call Oct. 21 between Epstein and Church . . . On Nov. 30, the
calendar lists a dinner with multiple attendees: “Dinner w/ Jeff Epstein . . .
From Church’s web page (my emphases):
Our lab works on AAV therapeutic vectors, including evasion of innate
immunity, capsid design via machine learning with large synthetic libraries
for multiplex testing of tissue tropism and evasion of cell/humoral
immunity. We study variation in human populations to various viruses
including rare neutralizing antibodies for HIV. We are interested in near-
extinction-scale Elephant and Swine Viruses (EEHV and ASFV). We
harness viral and anti-viral mechanisms (e.g., recombinases, CRISPR,
deaminases) to develop new editing technologies.
Re: Ps being able to distribute/sell their COVID-19 vaccine (C19V)
Johnson & Johnson (J&J) and the U.S. government claim to be risking $500
million each ($1B total) on J&J’s C19V-development effort.1
It seems at least possible that said 3-part claim is a lie, and part of a plan to have
J&J “discover”/sell a C19V that already exists. Re: “possible”: See pages 13-14
and 20-34 at slideshare.net/PostRomCom/re-email-sent-to-gates-foundation-
important-notes-below-in-the-description-section-of-this-page (hereafter this web
address is referred to as URL; SlideShare is owned by LinkedIn). Preview:
It seems (somewhat) likely that:
● J&J’s CEO is a stone-cold P2
● J&J employs many Ps3
J&J’s share of the global vaccine market is ~0%4
.

J&J’s expertise is HUGE fraud (HF), not breakthrough science5
.
Attempts to develop a C19V have been undertaken by many companies/
organizations that specialize in science, including 3 of the Big 4 in the vaccine
industry6
.
From an April 2020 article in The New York Times (my emphases):
The doctor who led the federal agency involved in developing a coronavirus
vaccine . . . was abruptly dismissed this week as the director of the
Department of Health and Human Services’ Biomedical Advanced Research
and Development Authority . . . [BARDA provided J&J with said $500M in
March 2020.]
In a statement released by his lawyers . . . [said doctor] said that he will ask
the HHS’s inspector general to “investigate the manner in which this
administration [i.e., Trump’s] has politicized the work of BARDA and has
pressured me and other conscientious scientists to fund companies with
political connections and efforts that lack scientific merit.”
From the June 2019 article on PublicIntegrity.org titled “TRUMP’S PRAISE PUT
DRUG FOR VETS ON FAST TRACK, BUT EXPERTS AREN’T SURE IT
WORKS”:
Stakes are high for pharmaceutical giant Johnson & Johnson; did company’s
relationship with president’s buddies, VA give drug a boost?
Sometimes, (plans to perpetrate) HFs are (bizarrely) unsophisticated7
.
1
From a March 30, 2020 article by Reuters News Agency:
Johnson & Johnson said on Monday that it and the US government will
invest $1 billion to create enough manufacturing capacity to make more than

1 billion doses of a vaccine it is testing to stop the new coronavirus.
From a March 30, 2020 article on Forbes.com:
Paul Stoffels, chief scientific officer at Johnson & Johnson, says it will start
manufacturing this month before the [would-be] vaccine has gone
through clinical trials or been approved by the FDA [my emphasis].
That’s in order to get large quantities of the vaccine ready to go to market
early next year, if it’s given the green light by regulatory agencies . . .
2,3
J&J’s CEO: 1) was a soldier for 6 years (enlistee, not draftee), 2) has a decades-
long history of leveraging America’s de facto legalization of HF2.1
to enrich
himself by knowingly harming/killing children, women, military veterans, the
elderly, the mentally ill et al. From part 11 of a 15-article series on
HuffingtonPost.com titled “America’s Most Admired Lawbreaker”:
On November 4, 2013, Attorney General Eric Holder announced the
Justice Department’s $2.2 billion settlement with Johnson & Johnson. The
company had “recklessly put at risk the health of some of the most
vulnerable members of our society—including young children, the elderly
and the disabled,” Holder charged.
. . . The New York Times’ Katie Thomas wrote that, “Much of the conduct
highlighted in the case, which for Risperdal extends from 1999 through
2005, occurred while Alex Gorsky was vice president for sales and
marketing and later president of the company’s pharmaceutical unit, Janssen.
Mr. Gorsky became chief executive of Johnson & Johnson last year.”
. . . A year later [after the settlement], as thousands of Risperdal personal
injury suits were pending . . .
From 2018 book Tailspin: The People and Forces Behind America's Fifty-Year
Fall—and Those Fighting to Reverse It:

[W]hat was especially intriguing about Johnson & Johnson’s case was that
the chief executive when its federal criminal case was settled, Alex Gorsky,
had been the Risperdal sales manager and then head of the J&J division that
included Risperdal during its explosive sales growth.
. . . [Gorsky] had been in charge of selling the product at the center of the
illicit marketing activity before he had moved up the ladder. Documents the
government subpoenaed during its investigation placed Gorsky at meetings
related to the conduct that the government prosecuted and showed him on
email chains that discussed it. When, as Johnson & Johnson’s CEO, Gorsky
was asked in that 2012 deposition to explain the Risperdal business plan for
the year 2000 that targeted children despite the FDA’s prohibition on
marketing to them, he was being asked to explain the business plan that he
was in charge of.
From the October 2019 article in The Wall Street Journal titled “Johnson &
Johnson’s Legal Challenges Mount”:
Johnson & Johnson, facing lawsuits from more than 100,000 plaintiffs over
its product safety and marketing tactics, has taken the aggressive strategy of
battling many of the cases in court.
And it is losing. A lot.
For FUGLY details re: the suffering and deaths Gorsky/J&J has caused, see: 1) the
articles linked-to above, on page 28; 2) the posts about J&J on the blog Health
Care Renewal. Re: HCR, via 2019 book Crisis of Conscience: Whistleblowing in
an Age of Fraud:
In late 2004, [Roy] Poses[, M.D.] and a group of medical professionals . . .
began to publish the Health Care Renewal blog, to continue their
conversation about grave and growing problems in American medicine.

. . . Johnson & Johnson has been tagged sixty-one times, as Poses has
covered the company’s repeated frauds and abuses . . .
2.1
From Crisis of Conscience, which is published by Penguin Random House:
“[H]ow hollow the edifice of American democracy has become, how
insubstantial its checks and balances, after decades of self-interested
chiseling, reaming, drilling and blasting by various experts and insiders . . .”
“[T]he sweeping redefinition of fraud as clever business that has occurred
in our society . . .”
“[B]ig healthcare firms buy their way out of the frauds and crimes they’ve
perpetrated . . .”
“Hanford’s culture of impunity remains intact, because the would-be
regulators at the DOE and the EPA, but also at the state and local levels, are
part of the game, and look silently away as the billions roll into . . . the
pockets of corrupt contractor millionaires and their government
accomplices.”
“Leaking waste [that’s radioactive and deadly] is Hanford’s ongoing, slow-
motion catastrophe, but other cataclysms could happen in seconds.
According to a number of third-party expert reports, several decrepit
structures holding large caches of radioactivity are susceptible to nuclear
accidents which would threaten people across the Pacific Northwest.”
“Wall Street’s knowledge of its own impunity, proven in the aftermath of
2008, has devastated ethics in the finance industry. It explains the banks’
business-as-usual attitude to fraud, and their cost-of-doing-business
approach to lawsuits and settlements.”
“[W]histleblowers are essential in national defense, because the factors that

facilitate fraud—secrecy, the sense of mission and mystique, the culture of
impunity, and the flow of Other People’s Money—are more extreme.”
“[T]he power of whistleblowers is often illusory . . . We are in the midst of a
battle over whistleblowing, part of a larger struggle . . . between the rights of
individuals to know what their corporations and their government are doing,
and the ever greater power of organizations to keep their secrets. How these
conflicts are resolved will say much about the future strength of our
democracy.”
The author of Crisis of Conscience is a journalist whose writing has appeared in
The New Yorker, The New York Times Magazine, The Atlantic and National
Geographic.
From Tailspin:
By 2008, Michael Pearson, a Canadian-born Duke University graduate
working at McKinsey, had built the consulting company’s biggest practice
(which is saying something). Working out of an office in New Jersey, near
many of his clients, he advised some of the world’s largest drug companies,
including Johnson & Johnson, on how to maximize profit from their
patented prescription drugs.
Pearson’s advice to his clients [included:] . . . [B]oost sales by targeting
potential new groups of patients, even if that meant moving into
markets for which the FDA had not approved the use of the drug [my
emphasis]. For example, Johnson & Johnson would try to get doctors to
recommend its blockbuster anti-psychotic, Risperdal, for use by children
and the elderly, even though the FDA had determined that the drug had not
been proven safe for children or the elderly.

More below re: legalized HF in America.
4
From https://www.evaluate.com/vantage/articles/news/snippets/covid-19-
Vaccine-who-you-gonna-call:
5
More re: J&J’s expertise isn’t breakthrough science:

From a 2018 article on CNBC.com:
[P]int-size ventures are driving pharma innovation. The majority of drugs
approved in recent years originated at smaller outfits—63 percent of them
over the last five years, according to HBM Partners, a health-care investing
firm.
From a 2018 article on the Harvard Business School website:
The pharmaceutical industry has a tendency to concentrate on “me too” drug
development—therapies that are chemically similar to established drugs—
rather than on riskier, novel drugs.
. . . [N]ovel drugs with unproven chemical formulas are riskier to pursue
because they are less likely to win approval from the US Food and Drug
Administration. These drug candidates, which cost tens of millions of
dollars or more to develop, face a less than 10 percent chance of approval.
Me toos have greater than 20 percent chance of reaching the market, and
generally require lower investment.
From a 2020 article on ProPublica.org:
[A] drug called Spravato, made by Johnson & Johnson . . .
. . . J. Wesley Boyd, a psychiatry professor specializing in bioethics at
Harvard Medical School, objected to the cost of Spravato given its similarity
to ketamine, which is available much more cheaply. “It was derived from a
very inexpensive drug with a minor chemical tweak and then marketed at an
outrageously high price,” he said in an interview. “To see it become the next
big drug according to the hype is beyond ridiculous.”
From a 2012 article in The British Medical Journal:

Since the mid 1990s, independent reviews have also concluded that about
85-90% of all new drugs provide few or no clinical advantages for patients.
6
From an April 2020 article on The Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness
Innovations website:
As of April 8, 2020, 115 vaccine candidates are in varying stages of
development.
. . . [A] number of large multinational vaccine developers (such as . . .
Sanofi, Pfizer and GlaxoSmithKine) have engaged in COVID-19 vaccine
development . . .
7
From 2011 book No One Would Listen: A True Financial Thriller, by Harry
Markopolos (a.k.a. The Madoff Whistleblower):
“Within five minutes I told Frank, ‘There’s no way this is real. This is
bogus.’”
“I knew immediately that the numbers made no sense. . . . I knew what a
split-strike [investment] strategy was capable of producing, but this
particular one [the variant Madoff claimed to be utilizing] was so poorly
designed and contained so many glaring errors that I didn’t see how it could
be functional, much less profitable. At the bottom of the page, a chart of
Madoff’s return stream rose steadily at a 45-degree angle, which simply
doesn’t exist in finance.
. . . As I continued examining the numbers, the problems with them began
popping out as clearly as a red wagon in a field of snow. There was a
stunning lack of financial sophistication. Anyone who understood the math
of the market would have seen these problems immediately. A few minutes
later I laid the papers down on my desk. ‘This is a fraud, Frank,’ I told him.
‘You’re an options guy. You know there’s no way in hell this guy’s getting

these returns from this strategy. He’s either got to be front-running or it’s a
Ponzi scheme. But whatever it is, it’s total bullshit.’”
More re: Ps might have political/judicial influence that’s been growing for
several/many years
The 4 indicators previewed below (not above), suggest that:
● Ps in the U.S. government (USG-Ps) will be able to prevent/sabotage (some)
counter-resistance by non-Ps (e.g., USG-Ps can invent pseudo-problems that
divert focus/resources)
● non-P USG-ers can gain REWARD$ by helping USG-Ps (e.g., by not
whistleblowing)
1 of 4
From 2018 book The Watchdogs Didn’t Bark: How the NSA Failed to Protect
America from the 9/11 Attacks:
[S]tarting in early summer of 2001, CounterTerror staff, managers, and even
the director were worried that something terrible was coming . . .
[U]nbeknownst to them, Al Qaeda had pushed back the date of their impend-
ing attack from July 4 to September 11. However, warning signs abounded
that convinced the counterterror operators that something big was imminent.
. . . Like dominoes falling, events started cascading on top of each other
throughout the month of August 2001.
. . . At the president’s ranch in Crawford, his CIA briefer Mike Morrell
presented him the soon-to-be-infamous August 6 presidential daily briefing
entitled “Bin Laden Determined to Strike in US.”

. . . On the afternoon of August 20, 2001, [NSA-er] Maureen Baginski asked
Bill Binney and Kirk Wiebe to her office. She explained that she was
officially terminating their program ThinThread.
From Crisis of Conscience: Whistleblowing in an Age of Fraud:
“Trailblazer cost America more than money. ‘Trailblazer was the largest
intelligence failure in the history of the NSA,’ Binney told me. ‘By killing
ThinThread and going ahead with Trailblazer, the Agency traded the security
of the nation in exchange for money.’
This assessment isn’t merely the sour grapes of a manager whose program
lost out to a competitor in an office turf war. Tom Drake, who remained at
the agency after Binney and the others retired, describes how, shortly after
9/11, he used ThinThread as a testbed to analyze information in the NSA
databases from the weeks preceding the attacks. The program, he says,
swiftly pinpointed each of the terrorists involved, their communications and
movements before the hijackings and their dispersion patterns afterward.”
“ThinThread . . . had been built by a handful of NSA employees for a total
cost of $3.2 million; in early 2001 it was largely complete, and had already
been implemented in intelligence sites abroad. ThinThread was doomed by
its own thrift, Binney says. ‘Six employees and $3.2 million? You can’t
build an empire with that. How many contracts can you list? That’s why they
had to kill us.’
. . . [In early 2001] Congress had enough confidence in ThinThread to direct
the NSA to deploy it in eighteen test sites, and to allocate about $9.5 million
for this purpose. A classified Pentagon report praised ThinThread’s data
analysis capabilities, and directed that the program be implemented and
enhanced. But launching ThinThread would show that the intelligence
problem for which Trailblazer was being created had already been solved,
Binney says, so the NSA slow-rolled ThinThread while proceeding with

Trailblazer, for which he says Hayden had initially requested $3.8 billion
and would eventually ask for even more.
2 of 4
From the 2018 article in U.S. News and World Report titled “The 10 Richest
Counties in the U.S.”:
[H]alf of the top 10 fell in northern Virginia, just outside the nation’s capital
. . .
3 of 4
December 2019 articles in The Washington Post collected as “The Afghanistan
Papers: A Secret History of the War” indicate that the U.S.’s ongoing, 18-year
“war” is a HUGE fraud. From the articles:
[S]enior U.S. officials failed to tell the truth about the war in Afghanistan
throughout the 18-year campaign . . . hiding unmistakable evidence the war
had become unwinnable.
. . . “We were devoid of a fundamental understanding of Afghanistan —we
didn’t know what we were doing,” Douglas Lute, a three-star Army general
who served as the White House’s Afghan war czar during the Bush and
Obama administrations, told government interviewers in 2015.
. . . Since 2001, the Defense Department, State Department and U.S. Agency
for International Development have spent or appropriated between $934
billion and $978 billion . . .
From a 2019 article on the website of the Federation of American Scientists:

During the five year period from 2013-2017 . . . the Department of Defense

entered into more than 15 million contracts with contractors who had been
indicted [for], fined [for], and/or convicted of fraud, or who reached
settlement agreements. The value of those contracts exceeded $334 billion,
according to the . . . Report on Defense Contracting Fraud, DoD report to
Congress, December 2018.
From “The Afghanistan Papers”:
The gusher of aid that Washington spent on Afghanistan also gave rise to
historic levels of corruption.
In public, U.S. officials insisted they had no tolerance for graft. But in the
Lessons Learned interviews, they admitted the U.S. government looked the
other way while Afghan power brokers—allies of Washington—plundered
with impunity.
History suggests that said power brokers were able to keep only a small fraction of
the money they stole.
From The Outlaw Bank: A Wild Ride into the Secret Heart of BCCI:
When OPEC raised the price of oil, the United States went along with it. It
was an incredibly civilized thing to do, but privately we threatened them
with the use of military force and a total embargo if the oil producers didn’t
invest their oil dollars in Western banks and spend most of them on Western
goods.
4 of 4
My experiences with USG agencies. Details: URL. Excerpt 1 of 3:
In 2016 I submitted my 1.0 threat-analysis to U.S. intelligence agencies (IAs); in
2018 and ‘19 I submitted my updated threat-analyses, along with front-company

info. No uptake. Possible explanation: IAs’ willingness to acknowledge/manage
risks has been disincentivized via: 1) the de facto legalization of HUGE fraud (HF)
in the U.S., 2) revolving doors between government and industry, 3) IAs are
“effectively beyond oversight or control,” unless whistleblowers risk career
damage/loss, imprisonment, etc. (i.e., IAs are IDEAL partners for companies
seeking “profits” via HF).
2 of 3:
In August 2019 I recognized that Jeffrey Epstein might’ve been a big part of Ps’
resistance (keywords re: “recognized”: hypersexuality correlates strongly with
psychopathy, Epstein’s many shell companies (SCs), SCs are a main way that
terrorist-networks raise, move, conceal and spend money). Subsequent events,
involving me, led me to conclude that my planned FC has been precluded by some
U.S.-government managers and/or some USG contractors. (Re: USGCs precluding:
See page 152.)
3 of 3:
For starters, see pages 174-180 below. Excerpt 1 of 3:
Again, in August 2019 I recognized that Epstein might’ve been a big part of Ps
resisting re: PsIMP.
On August 24:
I phoned the FBI. Discussion started re: Epstein. Within ~10 seconds, the call was
interfered with (FBI-er could no longer hear me, I could still hear her) [1].
Soon after, I called the newsroom of the NY Daily News. Reached a reporter.
Discussion started re: Epstein. Within ~10 seconds, the call was interfered with as
above. Called back 2x. Both calls were terminated as soon as the first ring began.
Soon after, my friend called the newsroom, had no problem getting through.

Soon after said two call-backs, my phone was near me, not in use (i.e., no call
ongoing), I heard breathing coming from the handset [2].
. . .
[1] This can be confirmed via FOIA request, unless . . .
[2] Best case, a non-P who was part of said monitoring was trying to confirm my
suspicions.
— End of excerpt —
Excerpt 2 of 3:
In 2016, I submitted my 1.0 threat-analysis to U.S.-government agencies (e.g.,
IARPA, DHS). Subsequently, the U.S. military’s Defense Innovation Unit
requested a one-page summary from me. Since then, I’ve had a fair number of
experiences that suggest some Ps in government and/or the military are aware of
me [1]. Keywords re: “experiences”: career damage.
From 2018 book The Watchdogs Didn’t Bark: How the NSA Failed to Protect
America from the 9/11 Attacks:
Each time they [i.e., four of the “NSA Five” whistleblowers] felt they were
about to land a contract, it suddenly disappeared, and friends inside the NSA
let them know that [then Director of the NSA Michael] Hayden and his
executives had interfered behind the scenes to squash their potential deals.
“[A former CIA military analyst:] ‘The full, classified version of the DoD IG
report issued in December 2004 essentially validates every allegation that
they [the NSA Five] made.’”

“[Said analyst,] who read the original, unredacted IG report [i.e., said 2004
report] told me the vast majority of the redactions had been made not to
shield legitimate national security secrets, but to avoid embarrassing senior
NSA management, and especially its director, Michael Hayden. ‘This is the
most damning government document I’ve ever seen, in all of my time in
Washington,’ the analyst said.
Despite—and because of—its yawning lacunae, the report tells a powerful
story of whistleblowing, to which forces inside the NSA, the Pentagon, and
the DOJ reacted with customary savagery [my emphasis].”
[1] In 2018 and ‘19 I submitted my updated threat-analyses to government
agencies, along with front-company info. Re: Ps in the military: See pages 177-
179.
Excerpt 3 of 3:
[5] From 2017 book Warnings: How to Find Cassandras and Stop Catastrophes,
co-authored by a former U.S. National Coordinator for Security and Counter-
Terrorism (my emphases):
In many instances, however, it seemed that an expert or expert group, a
Cassandra, had accurately predicted what would happen. They were often
ignored . . .
. . . Warnings that have this potential to steal resources from less
threatening projects tend to encounter institutional reluctance to tackle
the issue. Audiences who react by rejecting an issue for these reasons tend
to be the kind of decision makers who help to create Cassandra Events.
[6] Worst case re: 8/24 [i.e., August 24, 2019]: My threat-analyses motivated some

USG managers and associated USG contractors to expand their war on whistle-
blowers to encompass some prospective Cassandras, starting with me.
The redacted version of the 2004 audit report [i.e., the 2004 report referenc-
ed above], Eddington says, proves that the NSA is effectively beyond
oversight or control, since by invoking Section 6 of the NSA Act of 1959,
the agency is able to withhold anything having to do with personnel or
operations. “That report shows how the NSA, a government agency which is
supposed to be subject to independent audit by the DoD IG, can basically
thwart transparency efforts to expose waste, fraud, abuse and criminal
conduct . . .”
. . . Ultimately, Eddington blames Congress for accepting secrecy and lack
of accountability among the intelligence agencies as well as the military . . .
— End of indicator #4 (i.e., my experiences with USG agencies) —
Re: my experiences with USG agencies indicate (almost) all VWPnPs aren’t
aware that PsIMP
See above and below. Keywords: most of America’s de facto policy-makers,
personalized bioweapons.
Re: DB & BCCI
Details: URL. Key acronyms (for searching): DB, BCCI.
Excerpt re: BCCI

From a 1992 U.S. Senate report on BCCI (my emphases):
[L]argest case of organized crime in history, spanning over . . . 72 nations
. . . finance terrorism . . . assist the builders of a Pakistani nuclear bomb
. . .
From 1993 book The Outlaw Bank: A Wild Ride into the Secret Heart of BCCI, co-
authored by two journalists who covered BCCI for Time magazine (my emphases):
From interviews with sources close to BCCI, Time has pieced together a
portrait of a clandestine division of the bank called the Black Network,
which functions as a global intelligence operation and a mafia-like
enforcement squad. . . . [T]he 1,500-employee Black Network has used
sophisticated spy equipment and techniques, along with bribery, extortion,
kidnapping and even, by some accounts, murder.
BCCI was shut down in 1991 by regulators/attorneys-general of several nations
(e.g., nations complicit in BCCI’s crimes for many years, including the United
States).
. . .
From said 1992 report:
BCCI systematically bribed world leaders and . . . prominent political
figures in most of the 73 countries in which BCCI operated.
Excerpt re: BCCI leveraged HF
[BCCI’s criminality included:] fraud by BCCI and BCCI customers
involving billions of dollars; money laundering in Europe, Africa, Asia,

and the Americas . . .
Excerpt re: DB & BCCI
Jeffrey Epstein FIT the profile of top executives of BCCI (e.g., BCCI leveraged
underage girls to blackmail/extort, Epstein committed many of the other crimes
committed by said execs).
It seems at least somewhat likely that Epstein’s bank was part of DB. From said
1992 report:
BCCI was from its earliest days made up of multiplying layers of entities,
related to one another through an impenetrable series of holding companies,
affiliates, subsidiaries, banks-within-banks [my emphasis] . . .
. . .
Re: Epstein FIT the profile of top BCCI execs
From The Outlaw Bank:
The protocol department [of BCCI] was also responsible for sweeping the
countryside in search of another kind of prey: very young girls [my
emphasis] for the entertainment of the sheikhs and Middle-Eastern
businessmen.
[T]he wife of a Pakistani doctor, was in charge of rounding up the girls and
bringing them to Karachi to be outfitted in proper clothes before being
presented to the princely clients. Often she would shepherd more than fifty
girls at a time through a department store, shopping for jewelry and dresses.
This practice was so successful—far more effective than giving away
microwave ovens or toasters—that the bank would spend as much as
$100,000 on such an evening’s entertainment. According to the Senate

testimony of Nazir Chinoy, Madame Rahim would also “interview girls,
women, and take them . . . to Abu Dhabi for a dancing show or arrange some
singing shows." Throughout the Middle East, “dancing girls” and “singing
girls” are euphemisms for prostitutes; Chinoy chose to be tactful before the
TV cameras.
From an August 2019 article on TheDailyBeast.com:
Police say Epstein was sexually abusing girls as young as 13, many of them
from poor families and broken homes. And, according to lawsuits filed by
victims, Epstein loaned them out to his famous friends.
According to [BCCI employee] Masri, the protocol officers . . . were also
responsible . . . for luring businessmen, military officers, and politicians into
Abedi’s web of intrigue through a combination of favors, money, blackmail
[my emphasis], and intimidation.
From the 2019 article in The New York Times titled “The Day Jeffrey Epstein Told
Me He Had Dirt on Powerful People”:
The overriding impression I took away from our roughly 90-minute
conversation was that Mr. Epstein knew an astonishing number of rich,
famous and powerful people, and had photos to prove it. He also claimed to
know a great deal about these people, some of it potentially damaging or
embarrassing, including details about their supposed sexual proclivities and
recreational drug use.
The strange and still murky ties between BCCI and the intelligence
agencies of several countries are so pervasive that even the White House

has become entangled. As Time reported . . . the National Security Council
has used BCCI to funnel money for the Iran-Contra deals, and the CIA
maintained accounts in BCCI for covert operations. Moreover, investigators
have told Time that the Defense Intelligence Agency has maintained a slush-
fund account with BCCI, apparently to pay for clandestine activities.
From an August 2019 article on TheDailyBeast.com:
“I was told Epstein ‘belonged to intelligence’ and to leave it alone,” [said
Alex Acosta, re: the non-prosecution plea deal that Acosta—then the U.S.
Attorney in Miami, Florida—provided to Epstein in 2007. Epstein had been
accused of unlawful sex with minors and prostitution, but ended up
pleading guilty to two counts of soliciting prostitution from a minor.]
BCCI was not a bank which made an adequate return on investment
through lending out depositors funds like other banks, but a “Ponzi
scheme,” which used new depositors funds to pay current expenses and to
repay earlier depositors . . .
For BCCI’s 1.4 million depositors who had placed an estimated $20 billion
with the bank, there would be less than $2 billion of real assets to pay them
[after BCCI was shuttered] . . .
From the July 2019 article on TheDailyBeast.com titled “Ponzi Scheme Victims
Say Epstein Swindled Them”:
In 1991, the director of insurance for the state of Illinois sued Hoffenberg
[Epstein’s employer during said Ponzi]; Epstein was not a defendant, but
the complaint claimed he and his company improperly received $215,000
worth of checks from the insurance companies’ accounts.

From 2019 book Epstein: Dead Men Tell No Tales—Spies, Lies and Blackmail:
Hoffenberg [see above] told reporter Doug Montero[:]
. . . Jeffrey Epstein had worked in Europe [during the 1980s]. . . . He was
very heavily involved in the illegal side of the business, of the money
laundering, the spying, the arms sales [my emphasis]. I’m sure there was
some legitimate components that wouldn’t be criminal, but the majority of
his work product was criminal.
At this late hour of many years later, I like being concise and I don’t want
to misquote, but I can tell you that they sold armaments throughout the
Middle East and around the world.
. . .
More re: DB might equate to a BCCI variant
BCCI’s early/foundational criminality derived from Muslims feeling imperiled.
From The Outlaw Bank (my emphases):
The hidden alliances in Pakistan—and within other Islamic states—
provided Abedi and BCCI the kind of sweeping immunity from laws and
regulation that is assumed by sovereign nations when they take action in
the name of ‘national security.’ . . . BCCI, fueled by petro-dollars, was
going to forge the shining new sword of Islam. It would be a terrible
Nuclear Age sword that would give Pakistan—and other Muslim
nations—parity with the Zionists . . .
From said 1992 U.S. Senate report:
By fracturing corporate structure, record keeping, regulatory review, and

audits . . . [BCCI founder] Abedi developed in BCCI an ideal mechanism
for facilitating illicit activity by others . . .
From Dark Towers:
“A hodgepodge of hundreds of different systems polluted the bank’s
ecosystem. One implication was that there was no way for the bank to
measure or understand what it was actually doing.”
“Deutsche more than almost any other multinational financial institution
deftly managed to exploit rivalries among regulators to shield itself from
tougher rules or greater outside scrutiny.”
— End of excerpt re: DB & BCCI —
Re: my finders’-fee offer
Details: URL. Excerpt:
It seems likely that the person I’m seeking to partner with will view my
proposal as an offer he can’t refuse. Details below, starting on page 108 (use
keyword search: input “finder”; in particular, see pages 267-272). Keywords:
greed, fear (e.g., of job loss).
. . . Said finders’-fee will be 20%-ownership of the startup variant of
Amazon.com that’ll result from said partnership. I’ll pay you “huge $” for
your ownership stake on the day you receive it; if you wait to sell your stake,
“Rockefeller-ian . . .
Details about my planned startup are below; many more details at URL.
Re: non-Ps who’ll expedite PsIMP by being the most valuable of the AI-CE
industry’s customers, entrepreneurs and employees

Re: PsIMP ([summary of] reasons 2 and 3[; details at URL])
In the years ahead:
● the cost of conceiving a child via buying a top-quality gamete will decrease
steadily/rapidly (e.g., soon all women with health insurance will be able to
afford in vitro fertilization and pre-implantation genetic diagnosis
● “superstar-biased” technological change (SBTC) will continue to be rapid
and to accelerate rapidly
● buying a top-quality gamete will be the best way for most individuals to co-
conceive a child who can thrive amid SBTC (i.e., a buyer’s child would
receive half of his/her DNA from the buyer and half from the seller)
● scientists and technologists will continue to produce aids to child develop-
ment (i.e., help for (single) parents)
As demand for top-quality gametes increases, demand for indicators of gamete
quality will increase. In particular, demand for better indicators of learning ability.
TOP indicators of learning ability will take shape via the ongoing build-out of
“human-capital” markets (e.g., Adver-ties [i.e., my planned variant of LinkedIn],
prediction markets, CE).
Via the above re: “reasons 2 and 3,” there’ll be UPSIDE for all non-Ps: for some,
income via selling one’s gametes; for all, access to top-quality gametes; etc.
Implications of this upside: Many/most people will soon be active in human-
capital markets; many/most of these people will be active on a (near-)daily basis.
Via this activity:
Each P will be unable to reproduce via gaining access to (top-)quality

gametes, unless s/he coerces.
Each P with superstar-level ability will suffer very costly career damage/
loss, unless s/he coerces.
More re: the de facto legalization of HUGE fraud (HF) in the U.S.
HFs have been growing increasingly lucrative since the 1990s (i.e., lucrative even
if penalties are incurred via lawsuits, government regulators, etc.).
HFs create lucrative opportunities for intelligent Ps (IPs), because IPs can:
● design/implement (parts of) HFs
● be relied upon to not become whistleblowers (i.e., to not suffer crises of
conscience)
Keywords re: HFs have been creating MANY lucrative opportunities for IPs: high
ROI, money-printing by central banks, higher ROI via monopoly(-profits)-via-HF.
All told, it’s likely that: 1) Ps have A LOT of money for resisting, 2) the size of Ps’
war chest is increasing rapidly.
Re: HFs have been growing increasingly lucrative since the 1990s
From Crisis of Conscience:
“[H]ow hollow the edifice of American democracy has become, how
insubstantial its checks and balances, after decades of self-interested
chiseling, reaming, drilling and blasting by various experts and insiders

. . .”
“[T]he sweeping redefinition of fraud as clever business that has occurred
in our society . . .”
. . .
Re: high ROI via HF
Since the ‘90s, companies that excel at HF (HF-Cos) have been attracting
investment from institutional investors that deploy the savings of many Americans
(i.e., HF-Cos have been delivering higher ROI than non-HF-Cos, all things being
otherwise equal).
From CoC:
[T]hough Risperdal [law]suits have cost the company nearly $3 billion, it
sold $34 billion of the drug between 1993 and 2011 alone, sometimes at
profit margins approaching 97 percent. Viewed like this, $3 billion in fines
seems a smart investment. That’s evidently how the company felt. In April
2012, two months after the Texas trial, the board of Johnson & Johnson
made Alex Gorsky, the mastermind of Risperdal marketing, the firm’s new
chief executive. Wall Street cheered [my emphasis]: the company’s share
price held firm throughout the trial and, aside from brief blips, has climbed
steadily ever since. (Johnson & Johnson stock now sells for more than twice
what it was worth during the trial.)
Re: money-printing by central bankers
Since the financial crisis of 2008, HF-Cos have been attracting investment from
banks that have received at least ~$13.5 trillion “printed” by central bankers (e.g.,
banks that double as HF-Cos have used printed money to purchase shares of their
own stock).

From 2018 book Collusion: How Central Bankers Rigged the World (my
emphases):
By mid-2017, the total assets held by the G3 central banks—the US Fed, the
European Central Bank (ECB), and the Bank of Japan (BOJ)—through
conjured-money QE [i.e., quantitative-easing] programs had hit more
than $13.5 trillion. The figure was equivalent to 17 percent of currency-
adjusted global GDP.
To garner support for their multi-trillion-dollar QE strategies, the G3
central bank leaders peddled the notion that they were helping the general
economy. That couldn’t have been further from the truth. There was no
direct channel, no law, no requirement to divert the Fed's cheap money into
helping real people. This was because borrowing and subsequent investing
in the real economy required funds from private banks, and not from central
banks directly. That’s how the monetary system was set up. And private
banks were under no obligation to do anything with this cheap money
they didn’t want to do.
. . . Wall Street used its easy access to cheap money to . . . buy back
their own shares, thus effectively manipulating their own stock—in broad
daylight and with explicit approval from the Fed.
The author of Collusion worked as a managing director at Goldman Sachs, ran the
international analytics group as a senior managing director at Bear Stearns in
London, was a strategist at Lehman Brothers and an analyst at the Chase
Manhattan Bank.
Re: monopoly
From 2019 book Goliath: The 100-Year War Between Monopoly Power and
Democracy:

In the 1970s, we decided as a society that it would be a good idea to allow
private financiers and monopolists to organize our world. As a result, what is
around us is a matrix of monopolies, controlling our lives and manipulating
our communities and our politics.
. . . But we also face a challenge even more significant than the
consequences of a four-decade-long Reagan revolution, because layered on
top of the political revolution wrought by the Chicago law and economics
school and their left-wing allies is a technological revolution that has
enabled a far more dangerous concentration of power.
The author of Goliath was a senior policy advisor and budget analyst to the
Senate Budget Committee. He also worked in the U.S. House of Representatives
on financial-services policy, including Dodd-Frank, the Federal Reserve, and the
foreclosure crisis.
Re: monopoly(-profits)-via-HF
HF-Cos have been: 1) more likely to become monopolies than non-HF-Cos, all
things being otherwise equal, 2) able to outcompete other HF-Cos by “getting big
fast” (e.g., by maximizing HF ASAP).
Monopolies are ideally suited to profit from HF (i.e., to deliver high ROI via HF).
Keywords: too big to fail/jail.
More re: the above
See my serial narrative The Biggest Short: Making Amazon-/Microsoft-/VC-praised
AI-preneurship DISRUPTIVE, via The Making of Serial, Non-Fiction Novel
“Orgies for Free: Startup Comedy Meets Flowmantic Comedy Meets Disrupting
Bill Gates Meets . . .”
URL: https://thebiggestshort.substack.com/welcome

Re: TBS
Would’ve been a key offering of my planned front company (PFC). Of course, the
PFC is precluded by the publication of this write-up. But, really, the PFC became a
non-starter much earlier, not least because:
For reasons previewed above, it’s likely that USG-Ps have known for 2+
years about my work on PFC.
Ps’ awareness of said work could spread/increase rapidly1
.
All told, running the FC would be too risky given that the USG can’t be relied
upon to be a partner/ally2
.
1
From a 2020 article in U.K. newspaper The Independent titled “More than 700
arrested in ‘biggest ever’ UK operation against organised crime after encrypted
phone network cracked”:
[L]aw enforcement agencies accessed a secretive communications network.
Known as EncroChat, it was used on bespoke mobile phones that were
designed to be secure against police infiltration and examination.
. . . “There were 60,000 users worldwide [my emphasis] and around 10,000
users in the UK,” the National Crime Agency (NCA) said . . .
“The sole use was for coordinating and planning the distribution of illicit
commodities, money laundering and plotting to kill . . .”
2
From an August 2020 article in The New York Times (my emphases):
“[A]nother problem making the German authorities increasingly anxious:
Infiltration of the very institutions, like the police, that are supposed to be

doing the investigating [of Neo-Nazis].
In July the police chief of the western state of Hesse resigned after police
computers had been repeatedly accessed for confidential information that
was then used by neo-Nazis in death threats. It was in Hesse that a well-
known neo-Nazi assassinated a regional politician last summer . . .”
“Neo-Nazi groups and other extremists call it Day X—a mythical moment
when Germany’s social order collapses . . . Today Day X preppers are
drawing serious people with serious skills and ambition.
Increasingly, the German authorities consider the scenario a pretext for
domestic terrorism by far-right plotters or even for a takeover of the
government.”
On the upside, re: no FC (i.e, no (anticipatory) intelligence via my planned
startup)
From TBS:
In particular, said market will facilitate purchases of CE for AI. Details below.
Keywords: customized bundles of data, software and services, purchased to: 1)
launch each buyer’s “1.0” AI, 2) augment buyers’ AI (e.g., software purchased to
add features to a 1.0 AI, data that a 2.0 AI can learn from); it’s a near-certainty
that CE-for-AI will be to the AI economy what oil has been to the industrial
economy.
Re: CE for AI
From 2015 book Superforecasting: The Art and Science of Prediction, co-authored
by University of Pennsylvania professor of psychology and political science Philip
Tetlock:

Doug knows that when people read for pleasure they naturally gravitate to
the like-minded. So he created a database containing hundreds of
information sources—from the New York Times to obscure blogs—that are
tagged by their ideological orientation, subject matter, and geographical
origin, then wrote a program that selects what he should read next using
criteria that emphasize diversity. Thanks to Doug’s simple invention, he is
sure to constantly encounter different perspectives.
From 2018 book Superminds: The Surprising Power of People and Computers
Thinking Together, by the MIT professor who’s the Director of MIT’s Center for
Collective Intelligence:
What if each participant [in a market] has his or her own “stable” of
[AI-powered software ro]bots? Then participants will compete to create
smarter and smarter bots [my emphasis]. If your bots are better than mine at
making accurate predictions, then you will make more money than I will.
. . . Today’s financial markets are leading the way, with investment managers
increasingly relying on quantitative, often AI-based, trading algorithms.
Re: CE will almost certainly be the oil of the AI economy
From Nobel laureate economist Paul Romer’s entry on Economic Growth in the
2008 edition of The Concise Encyclopedia of Economics:
“[T]he country that takes the lead in the twenty-first century will be the one
that implements an innovation that more effectively supports the production
of new ideas in the private sector [e.g., AI-produced ideas].”
“Perhaps the most important ideas of all are meta-ideas—ideas about how to
support the production and transmission of other ideas. . . . North Americans
invented the modern research university . . .”

From 2006 book Knowledge and the Wealth of Nations:
This book tells the story of a single technical paper in economics [Romer
(1990): Endogenous Technical Change] . . .
. . . Romer won a race of sorts, a race within the community of university-
based research economists to make sense of the process of globalization at
the end of the twentieth century and to say something practical and new
about how to encourage economic development . . .
From 2004 book The Mystery of Economic Growth, by a Harvard economist:
Interest in growth theory abruptly revived . . . in the 1980s. The two key
papers were by Romer (1986) and Lucas (1988). . . . Romer also initiated the
second wave of research on the “new” growth theory.
From 2014 book SuperIntelligence: Paths, Dangers, Strategies, published by
Oxford University Press:

More re: my work
Name of my planned startup: The Opportunity Services Group (OSG).
A key to OSG providing the Amazon.com of AI and CE is OSG providing the
most popular implementation of my Amazon-/VC-praised1
design that:
● will yield a next-gen variant of LinkedIn
● fixes the fatal flaw of 2003 “sensation” BlogShares.com
● . . .

1
From said 2004 email sent to me by Amazon.com’s first Director of
Personalization:
We thought a lot about reputation systems. We thought a bit about
personalized advertising systems. We thought a lot about blogging and social
networking systems. . . [W]e’ve been working a very similar vein to the one
you describe . . .
A key to OSG providing the most popular implementation of said design is OSG
producing and popularizing Orgies for Free, which will:
● originate as a serial “non-fiction novel,” published online
● adapt and expand on the 200 pages of my unpublished serial non-fiction
novel titled Post-Romantic Comedy: A Startup Comedy (PRC)
● like PRC, be designed to motivate readers to become equity-crowdfunders
(i.e., part-owners) of OSG (hence startup comedy)
● spin-off from this serial narrative
Re: OfF will be a flowmantic comedy
Summary (details below)
Flow is the state-of-mind that enables top performance/problem-solving.
Often, flow via collaboration—“group flow”—sparks romantic attraction.
Adver-ties will give rise to MANY flowmances.

Re: orgies-for-free (part of the basis for OfF)
Summary (some details follow; more below)
For each of us, maximizing the amount of time we’re in a flow state is a key to
thriving/surviving amid “superstar-biased” technological change (e.g., amid
“winner-take-all” markets).
So keeping collaborators happy . . . polyamory . . .
Human society is a type of “complex adaptive system” (CAS).
In CASs, “order for free” (OFF) emerges at “the boundary between order and
chaos.”
A variant of OFF seems very likely to emerge soon, partly via group flow and
Adver-ties: orgies-for-free (O-F-F) [1].

O-F-F will be women-FRIENDLY almost certainly [2].
Keywords re: [1, 2]: “new science” re: “women, lust and infidelity.”
Re: MANY orgies (will) result from people adapting to evolutionary selection-
pressures that are intensifying rapidly (e.g., superstar-biased tech change)
From 2018 book Tell Me What You Want: The Science of Sexual Desire and How It
Can Help You Improve Your Sex Life:
I will offer an analysis of the largest-ever survey of Americans’ sexual
fantasies . . .
89 percent [of respondents] reported fantasizing about threesomes, 74
percent about orgies, and 61 percent about gangbangs. . . . [T]he majority of
women reported having each of these sex fantasies . . .
More than three-quarters of the men and women I surveyed hope to

eventually act on their favorite sexual fantasies.
Tell Me’s author has a PhD, is a former lecturer at Harvard and is a Research
Fellow at the Kinsey Institute.
Precedent for O-F-F, via humans’ closest primate relative
From 2018 book Untrue: Why Nearly Everything We Believe About Women, Lust,
and Infidelity Is Wrong and How the New Science Can Set Us Free:
[T]he bonobo, with whom we share nearly 99 percent of our DNA . . .
A 2017 study comparing human, chimp and bonobo muscles confirmed what
previous molecular research had suggested: “Bonobo muscles have changed
the least [from our common ancestor], which means they are the closest we
can get to having a ‘living’ ancestor,” according to the research head of the
George Washington University Center for the Advanced Study of Human
Paleobiology.
. . . [P]erhaps the most remarkable thing about bonobos . . . Basically, they
seem to have sex constantly throughout the day, with just about anybody.
Meredith Small reports being in a room of three hundred or so
primatologists and journalists of some early footage of bonobos in 1991,
before much was known about them. Moments after the film began, the
room fell utterly silent as the assembled took in the spectacle of these
primates having sex more times and in more positions and combinations
than most humans in any culture could even imagine.
. . . [B]onobos have sex to diffuse potential tension—when they come upon a
cache of food, for example, or a new bonobo troop, having sex is a way to
bond and take the stress level down. Parish pointed out that this was
happening as we observed them being fed. Once the food was flung down to
them, at least one pair of bonobos began to “consort” immediately. Only

then did they get down to the business of eating.
. . .
Martin Luther King Jr.: “The arc of the moral universe is long, but it bends toward
justice.

Worst case re: Trump 2020, via UPenn criminologist, Mary Trump et al: President’s one of ~77 million psychopaths imperiled (PsIMP) by advances in molecular genetics; he knows PsIMP; ...

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

What's hot

What's hot (19)

Similar to Worst case re: Trump 2020, via UPenn criminologist, Mary Trump et al: President’s one of ~77 million psychopaths imperiled (PsIMP) by advances in molecular genetics; he knows PsIMP; ...

Similar to Worst case re: Trump 2020, via UPenn criminologist, Mary Trump et al: President’s one of ~77 million psychopaths imperiled (PsIMP) by advances in molecular genetics; he knows PsIMP; ... (9)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (8)

Worst case re: Trump 2020, via UPenn criminologist, Mary Trump et al: President’s one of ~77 million psychopaths imperiled (PsIMP) by advances in molecular genetics; he knows PsIMP; ...