Slides for Guest Lecture Skype with COMM 4370 New Media Technologies and Communicationat Schreiner University, February 28, 2013. Focuses on the role of the Internet and social media in democracy, protest, activism, and social change.
2. About
Dr. Kushin
Department of Communication
Shepherd University, WV
Research:
Social Media, Politics, Civic Engagement
Teach:
Social media, strategic communication, theory, research
@mjkushin | MattKushin.com | G+: Matt Kushin
4. Internet & Democracy
Competing perspectives of the role of internet in
democracy
Democratization – positive perspective
Fragmentation – negative perspective
Creative commons photo credit: Steve Rhode
5. For Citizens
Democratization
Good for democracy
Brings more people into political process by
Increasing information access
Empowering citizens to voice their concerns
Increasing ability to participate with others
Image creative commons by: david_shankbone
6. For Citizens
Fragmentation
Bad for democracy
Internet media stifles participation
It does not connect dispersed populations
It cannot unify large populations around a common
cause
This leaves the individual to feel alienated from the
democratic process
Photo: creative commons credit Brian Auer
7. Discussion
In last election, did you?
Expose yourself to:
Diverse perspectives about candidates, issues, or:
Mostly / only news & views that supported your
opinions?
Unfollow or unfriend someone who you disagree
with?
Hide them from your news feed?
8. Two Categories of Change
Democratic Participation:
politics, government, political campaigns
Activism: Protest, Direct
Democracy, Rebellion/uprising
9. Democratic Participation
Seeking participation in the democratic election of a
candidate or the influence of government
laws, regulations, to bring forth desired change.
Believe change comes from working within
institutional laws and norms to create change.
10. Activism: Protest, Direct
Democracy, & Social
Movements
Employs an “activist ethic” – that the institution(s)
is broken and change must come from the
outside.
Seeks to bring change to, or overturn perceived
oppressive institutions
May involve activity seen as “civic disobedience,”
which may be illegal
Protest
Revolution
12. Social Movements
Broad social alliances of people connected via a
shared interest in enacting or blocking social
change.
May be loosely organized
May be many alliances all working toward
common cause
Veganism & Peta on next slide = 1 example
13. Social Movements
Social Movement
Veganism
Deliberative Democracy (inside of laws)
Social Movement Organization (SMO)
Ex: PETA
Activist (outside of laws)
Group
Earth Liberation Front
14. Types of movements
2 Aspects
Focus:
Individual – Get individuals to use a designated
driver
Society – Change Drinking Age
Change
Limited change – tougher gun laws
Radical change – outlawing gun ownership
15. Movements &
Counter Movements
Women’s Rights movement advocates: Abortion
Rights
Counter movement:
Pro-Life Movement – A socially conservative
counter movement
16. Politics as Power Struggle
How can new communication technology be
used to challenge those in power?
17. Empowering Social
Movements
Communication is central to power.
Abilities to control dissemination of info key to all
power struggles
Technology has enabled social movements via:
Rapid & inexpensive means of organization
Cheap dissemination of propaganda
18. Comm & Movements
Example:
American Revolution relied on:
Printing Press
Federalist Papers - PR campaign of letters to
newspapers
Common Sense – Thomas Paine
19. 1999 Battle in Seattle
Demonstrated organizing capability of Web:
Protesters used Internet message boards and
email to organize massive protest on the World
Trade Organization convention in Seattle, 1999
22. Competing Perspectives
Other perspective
The role of social media is overhyped –
Social change occurs without social media
23. Example: Protest /
Revolutions
Authority controls power by controlling
communication
Ex: State run media
24. Egypt & Social Media
Video 1: Wael Ghonim of Google
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dqHPRHOHcN
8&feature=relmfu
25. If social media empowers individuals to
communicate
Spread information
Organize
Lower barriers to political participation
It can undermine authority
30. What the Smart Mob?
Use of interactive internet and
mobile technologies to coordinate
collective action
Enables constant communication
& coordination of dispersed
persons
31. Media production & distribution
in the palm of your hand
Dramatically increased access to information.
Undermined authoritarian control over communication.
Empowered citizens.
Gave people a voice – many for the first time.
32. s
Photos credit creative commons: bottom left: iCrossing | rest: Interact Egypt - Play Innovation
33. Discussion
What do you think?
Is social media a catalyst for change?
overhyped?
Would change occur without it?
35. Brief Activity
Series of “Yes/No” Questions on on next 2 sets of
slides.
On scrap paper, answer questions #1
On other side of paper, answer questions #2
We’ll discuss.
36. Questions #1
I have:
Signed an online petition
Liked a Facebook page for a cause
Example: Stop Offshore Drilling, Protect Gun
Rights, etc.
Retweeted or otherwise relayed information about
a cause you care about via social media
Wrote a blog post / created art or video
37. Questions #2
Yes/No:
I have:
Volunteered for a cause.
Donated money to a cause.
Protested or gone to a rally.
Otherwise worked on behalf of a political
candidate, party, or for a cause.
38. Slacker!
Slacktivism – Create a sense of accomplishment
for individual
But have little impact on political decisions
May distract citizens from other, more
effective, forms of engagement.
39. Online v. Offline
Participation
Some say:
That online participation (liking a Facebook page)
does not increase offline participation (actually
voting)
Others argue:
Online participation increases awareness and
raises interest, motivating offline participation
40. Example
Colby “likes” an anti-offshore drilling page on
Facebook
As a result, she feels she has supported the
cause
She doesn’t bother to get involved at a deeper
level
Ex:
Educating others
Raising money
Volunteering
41. Discussion
Are online activists “unwilling to get their hands
dirty and do the efforts required to actually
achieve these goals”?
Does online activism replace or increase offline
activism?
Positives – Tech has allowed a # of great positives Access information Empower peopleNegavites – just as new media can empower, they can also do damageMisinformation – people who purposefully give incorrect informationSmear/fear
These technologies also empower groups who seek to bring about changeThink of Thomas Payne’s common sense – an inspiration to Americans in the revolution
We could not have taken those photos, spread that message,
Writing:Almost a decade prior to Tahrir Square, Occupy Wall St.Howard Rheingold – “Smart Mobs”An example:http://blog.wired.com/27bstroke6/2008/03/san-francisco-a.htmlAny thoughts on the reading about G-20 protest?Iranian election protest. June 15, 2009
Why the slackivism in our country, and the activism elsewhere?