-
Be the first to like this
Slideshare uses cookies to improve functionality and performance, and to provide you with relevant advertising. If you continue browsing the site, you agree to the use of cookies on this website. See our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.
Slideshare uses cookies to improve functionality and performance, and to provide you with relevant advertising. If you continue browsing the site, you agree to the use of cookies on this website. See our Privacy Policy and User Agreement for details.
Published on
Presented at QuantCon Singapore 2016, Quantopian's quantitative finance and algorithmic trading conference, November 11th.
Over the past 30 years, trend following has been a remarkably successful futures trading strategy. Once a fringe trading style barely known outside of Chicago, it has grown into a 300 billion dollar global industry. It would be very difficult indeed to claim that trend following doesn’t work in the face of decades of empirical evidence otherwise. But trend following isn’t completely without problems.
It is well known that classic trend following models tend to lose money on a majority of trades. This is not necessarily an issue, since trend following is all about accepting a large number of small losses in exchange for a small number of large gains. As long as the net is positive, all is fine. That is the underlying idea of the strategy and it has historically worked very well.
However, if you dissect trend following models you can find weaknesses which could be exploited. This is what counter trend trading models are about. These counter trend models usually operate on a shorter time frame and with nearly opposite logic.
As counter trend models are gaining popularity in the systematic trading hedge fund field, a few questions arise. Are these models a threat to trend following? Can they be a complement to trend following? Can trend following be adapted to be less susceptible to the counter trend issue?
Be the first to like this
Login to see the comments