More Related Content Similar to Heizer supp 06 Similar to Heizer supp 06 (20) More from Rizwan Khurram (20) Heizer supp 061. Operations
Management
Supplement 6 –
Statistical Process
Control
PowerPoint presentation to accompany
Heizer/Render
Principles of Operations Management, 7e
Operations Management, 9e
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. S6 – 1
2. Outline
Statistical Process Control (SPC)
Control Charts for Variables
The Central Limit Theorem
Setting Mean Chart Limits (x-Charts)
Setting Range Chart Limits (R-Charts)
Using Mean and Range Charts
Control Charts for Attributes
Managerial Issues and Control Charts
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. S6 – 2
3. Outline – Continued
Process Capability
Process Capability Ratio (Cp)
Process Capability Index (Cpk )
Acceptance Sampling
Operating Characteristic Curve
Average Outgoing Quality
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. S6 – 3
4. Learning Objectives
When you complete this supplement
you should be able to:
1. Explain the use of a control chart
2. Explain the role of the central limit
theorem in SPC
3. Build x-charts and R-charts
4. List the five steps involved in
building control charts
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. S6 – 4
5. Learning Objectives
When you complete this supplement
you should be able to:
5. Build p-charts and c-charts
6. Explain process capability and
compute Cp and Cpk
7. Explain acceptance sampling
8. Compute the AOQ
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. S6 – 5
6. Statistical Process Control
(SPC)
Variability is inherent
in every process
Natural or common
causes
Special or assignable causes
Provides a statistical signal when
assignable causes are present
Detect and eliminate assignable
causes of variation
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. S6 – 6
7. Natural Variations
Also called common causes
Affect virtually all production processes
Expected amount of variation
Output measures follow a probability
distribution
For any distribution there is a measure
of central tendency and dispersion
If the distribution of outputs falls within
acceptable limits, the process is said to
be “in control”
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. S6 – 7
8. Assignable Variations
Also called special causes of variation
Generally this is some change in the process
Variations that can be traced to a specific
reason
The objective is to discover when
assignable causes are present
Eliminate the bad causes
Incorporate the good causes
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. S6 – 8
9. Samples
To measure the process, we take samples
and analyze the sample statistics following
these steps
Each of these
represents one
(a) Samples of the sample of five
product, say five boxes of cereal
boxes of cereal
taken off the filling
Frequency
# #
machine line, vary # # #
from each other in # # # #
weight # # # # # # #
# # # # # # # # # #
Figure S6.1 Weight
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. S6 – 9
10. Samples
To measure the process, we take samples
and analyze the sample statistics following
these steps
The solid line
represents the
(b) After enough distribution
samples are
taken from a
stable process,
they form a Frequency
pattern called a
distribution
Figure S6.1 Weight
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. S6 – 10
11. Samples
To measure the process, we take samples
and analyze the sample statistics following
these steps
(c) There are many types of distributions, including
the normal (bell-shaped) distribution, but
distributions do differ in terms of central
tendency (mean), standard deviation or
variance, and shape Figure S6.1
Frequency
Central tendency Variation Shape
Weight Weight Weight
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. S6 – 11
12. Samples
To measure the process, we take samples
and analyze the sample statistics following
these steps
(d) If only natural
causes of
variation are Frequency
present, the Prediction
output of a
process forms a
distribution that Tim
e
is stable over Weight
time and is Figure S6.1
predictable
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. S6 – 12
13. Samples
To measure the process, we take samples
and analyze the sample statistics following
these steps
?
? ??
?
(e) If assignable ?
? ?
?
causes are ?
? ?
?
?? ?
??
present, the Frequency
?
process output is Prediction
not stable over
time and is not
predicable Tim
e
Weight
Figure S6.1
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. S6 – 13
14. Control Charts
Constructed from historical data, the
purpose of control charts is to help
distinguish between natural variations
and variations due to assignable
causes
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. S6 – 14
15. Process Control
(a) In statistical
control and capable
of producing within
Frequency control limits
Lower control limit Upper control limit
(b) In statistical
control but not
capable of producing
within control limits
(c) Out of control
Size
(weight, length, speed, etc.) Figure S6.2
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. S6 – 15
16. Types of Data
Variables Attributes
Characteristics that Defect-related
can take any real characteristics
value Classify products
May be in whole or as either good or
in fractional bad or count
numbers defects
Continuous random Categorical or
variables discrete random
variables
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. S6 – 16
17. Central Limit Theorem
Regardless of the distribution of the
population, the distribution of sample means
drawn from the population will tend to follow
a normal curve
1. The mean of the sampling
distribution (x) will be the same x=µ
as the population mean µ
2. The standard deviation of the
sampling distribution (σ x) will
σ
equal the population standard σx =
n
deviation (σ ) divided by the
square root of the sample size, n
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. S6 – 17
18. Population and Sampling
Distributions
Three population Distribution of
distributions sample means
Mean of sample means = x
Beta
Standard
deviation of σ
the sample = σx =
Normal n
means
Uniform
| | | | | | |
-3σ x -2σ x -1σ x x +1σ x +2σ x +3σ x
95.45% fall within ± 2σ x
99.73% of all x
fall within ± 3σ x Figure S6.3
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. S6 – 18
19. Sampling Distribution
Sampling
distribution
of means
Process
distribution
of means
x=µ
(mean)
Figure S6.4
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. S6 – 19
20. Control Charts for Variables
For variables that have
continuous dimensions
Weight, speed, length,
strength, etc.
x-charts are to control
the central tendency of the process
R-charts are to control the dispersion of
the process
These two charts must be used together
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. S6 – 20
21. Setting Chart Limits
For x-Charts when we know σ
Upper control limit (UCL) = x + zσ x
Lower control limit (LCL) = x - zσ x
where x = mean of the sample means
or a target value set for the process
z = number of normal standard
deviations
σx = standard deviation of the
sample means
= σ/ n
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.
σ = population standard S6 – 21
22. Setting Control Limits
Hour 1 Hour Mean Hour Mean
Sample Weight of 1 16.1 7 15.2
Number Oat Flakes 2 16.8 8 16.4
1 17 3 15.5 9 16.3
2 13 4 16.5 10 14.8
3 16 5 16.5 11 14.2
4 18 6 16.4 12 17.3
n=9 5 17
6 16 For 99.73% control limits, z = 3
7 15
8 17 UCLx = x + zσ x = 16 + 3(1/3) = 17 ozs
9 16
Mean 16.1 LCLx = x - zσ x = 16 - 3(1/3) = 15 ozs
σ= 1
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. S6 – 22
23. Setting Control Limits
Control Chart
for sample of Variation due
Out of to assignable
9 boxes control causes
17 = UCL
Variation due to
16 = Mean natural causes
15 = LCL
Variation due
| | | | | | | | | | | |
to assignable
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Out of causes
Sample number control
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. S6 – 23
24. Setting Chart Limits
For x-Charts when we don’t know σ
Upper control limit (UCL) = x + A2R
Lower control limit (LCL) = x - A2R
where R = average range of the
samples
A2 = control chart factor found in
Table S6.1
x = mean of the sample means
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. S6 – 24
25. Control Chart Factors
Sample Size Mean Factor Upper Range Lower
Range
n A2 D4 D3
2 1.880 3.268 0
3 1.023 2.574 0
4 .729 2.282 0
5 .577 2.115 0
6 .483 2.004 0
7 .419 1.924 0.076
8 .373 1.864 0.136
9 .337 1.816 0.184
10 .308 1.777 0.223
12 .266 1.716 0.284
Table S6.1
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. S6 – 25
26. Setting Control Limits
Process average x = 12 ounces
Average range R = .25
Sample size n = 5
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. S6 – 26
27. Setting Control Limits
Process average x = 12 ounces
Average range R = .25
Sample size n = 5
UCLx = x + A2R
= 12 + (.577)(.25)
= 12 + .144
= 12.144 ounces
From
Table S6.1
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. S6 – 27
28. Setting Control Limits
Process average x = 12 ounces
Average range R = .25
Sample size n = 5
UCLx = x + A2R UCL = 12.144
= 12 + (.577)(.25)
= 12 + .144 Mean = 12
= 12.144 ounces
LCLx = x - A2R LCL = 11.857
= 12 - .144
= 11.857 ounces
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. S6 – 28
29. R – Chart
Type of variables control chart
Shows sample ranges over time
Difference between smallest and
largest values in sample
Monitors process variability
Independent from process mean
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. S6 – 29
30. Setting Chart Limits
For R-Charts
Upper control limit (UCLR) = D4R
Lower control limit (LCLR) = D3R
where
R = average range of the
samples
D3 and D4 = control chart factors
from Table S6.1
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. S6 – 30
31. Setting Control Limits
Average range R = 5.3 pounds
Sample size n = 5
From Table S6.1 D4 = 2.115, D3 = 0
UCLR = D4R UCL = 11.2
= (2.115)(5.3)
= 11.2 pounds Mean = 5.3
LCLR = D3 R LCL = 0
= (0)(5.3)
= 0 pounds
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. S6 – 31
32. Mean and Range Charts
(a)
These (Sampling mean is
sampling shifting upward but
distributions range is consistent)
result in the
charts below
UCL
(x-chart detects
x-chart shift in central
tendency)
LCL
UCL
(R-chart does not
R-chart detect change in
mean)
LCL
Figure S6.5
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. S6 – 32
33. Mean and Range Charts
(b)
These
(Sampling mean
sampling
is constant but
distributions
dispersion is
result in the
increasing)
charts below
UCL
(x-chart does not
x-chart detect the increase
in dispersion)
LCL
UCL
(R-chart detects
R-chart increase in
dispersion)
LCL
Figure S6.5
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. S6 – 33
34. Steps In Creating Control
Charts
1. Take samples from the population and
compute the appropriate sample statistic
2. Use the sample statistic to calculate control
limits and draw the control chart
3. Plot sample results on the control chart and
determine the state of the process (in or out of
control)
4. Investigate possible assignable causes and
take any indicated actions
5. Continue sampling from the process and reset
the control limits when necessary
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. S6 – 34
36. Control Charts for Attributes
For variables that are categorical
Good/bad, yes/no,
acceptable/unacceptable
Measurement is typically counting
defectives
Charts may measure
Percent defective (p-chart)
Number of defects (c-chart)
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. S6 – 36
37. Control Limits for p-Charts
Population will be a binomial distribution,
but applying the Central Limit Theorem
allows us to assume a normal distribution
for the sample statistics
UCLp = p + zσ p
^
p(1 - p)
σp =
^
n
LCLp = p - zσ p
^
p = mean fraction defective in the sample
z = number of standard deviations
σp = standard deviation of the sampling distribution
^
n = sample size
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. S6 – 37
38. p-Chart for Data Entry
Sample Number Fraction Sample Number Fraction
Number of Errors Defective Number of Errors Defective
1 6 .06 11 6 .06
2 5 .05 12 1 .01
3 0 .00 13 8 .08
4 1 .01 14 7 .07
5 4 .04 15 5 .05
6 2 .02 16 4 .04
7 5 .05 17 11 .11
8 3 .03 18 3 .03
9 3 .03 19 0 .00
10 2 .02 20 4 .04
Total = 80
80 (.04)(1 - .04)
p= = .04 σp = = .02
(100)(20) ^
100
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. S6 – 38
39. p-Chart for Data Entry
UCLp = p + zσ p = .04 + 3(.02) = .10
^
LCLp = p - zσ p = .04 - 3(.02) = 0
^
.11 –
.10 – UCLp = 0.10
.09 –
Fraction defective
.08 –
.07 –
.06 –
.05 –
.04 – p = 0.04
.03 –
.02 –
.01 – LCLp = 0.00
.00 – | | | | | | | | | |
2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20
Sample number
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. S6 – 39
40. p-Chart for Data Entry
UCLp = p + zσ p = .04 + 3(.02) = .10
^
Possible
LCLp = p - zσ p = .04 - 3(.02) = 0
^ assignable
causes present
.11 –
.10 – UCLp = 0.10
.09 –
Fraction defective
.08 –
.07 –
.06 –
.05 –
.04 – p = 0.04
.03 –
.02 –
.01 – LCLp = 0.00
.00 – | | | | | | | | | |
2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20
Sample number
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. S6 – 40
41. Control Limits for c-Charts
Population will be a Poisson distribution,
but applying the Central Limit Theorem
allows us to assume a normal distribution
for the sample statistics
UCLc = c + 3 c LCLc = c - 3 c
c = mean number defective in the sample
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. S6 – 41
42. c-Chart for Cab Company
c = 54 complaints/9 days = 6 complaints/day
UCLc = c + 3 c 14 –
UCLc = 13.35
14
Number defective
=6+3 6 12 –
= 13.35 10 –
8 –
6 – c= 6
LCLc = c - 3 c 4 –
=6-3 6 2 – LCLc = 0
0 – | | | | | | | | |
=0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Day
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. S6 – 42
43. Managerial Issues and
Control Charts
Three major management decisions:
Select points in the processes that
need SPC
Determine the appropriate charting
technique
Set clear policies and procedures
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. S6 – 43
44. Which Control Chart to Use
Variables Data
Using an x-chart and R-chart:
Observations are variables
Collect 20 - 25 samples of n = 4, or n =
5, or more, each from a stable process
and compute the mean for the x-chart
and range for the R-chart
Track samples of n observations each
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. S6 – 44
45. Which Control Chart to Use
Attribute Data
Using the p-chart:
Observations are attributes that can
be categorized in two states
We deal with fraction, proportion, or
percent defectives
Have several samples, each with
many observations
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. S6 – 45
46. Which Control Chart to Use
Attribute Data
Using a c-Chart:
Observations are attributes whose
defects per unit of output can be
counted
The number counted is a small part of
the possible occurrences
Defects such as number of blemishes
on a desk, number of typos in a page
of text, flaws in a bolt of cloth
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. S6 – 46
47. Patterns in Control Charts
Upper control limit
Target
Lower control limit
Normal behavior.
Process is “in control.”
Figure S6.7
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. S6 – 47
48. Patterns in Control Charts
Upper control limit
Target
Lower control limit
One plot out above (or
below). Investigate for
Figure S6.7 cause. Process is “out
of control.”
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. S6 – 48
49. Patterns in Control Charts
Upper control limit
Target
Lower control limit
Trends in either
direction, 5 plots.
Figure S6.7 Investigate for cause of
progressive change.
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. S6 – 49
50. Patterns in Control Charts
Upper control limit
Target
Lower control limit
Two plots very near
lower (or upper)
Figure S6.7 control. Investigate for
cause.
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. S6 – 50
51. Patterns in Control Charts
Upper control limit
Target
Lower control limit
Run of 5 above (or
below) central line.
Figure S6.7 Investigate for cause.
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. S6 – 51
52. Patterns in Control Charts
Upper control limit
Target
Lower control limit
Erratic behavior.
Investigate.
Figure S6.7
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. S6 – 52
53. Process Capability
The natural variation of a process
should be small enough to produce
products that meet the standards
required
A process in statistical control does not
necessarily meet the design
specifications
Process capability is a measure of the
relationship between the natural
variation of the process and the design
specifications
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. S6 – 53
54. Process Capability Ratio
Upper Specification - Lower Specification
Cp =
6σ
A capable process must have a Cp of at
least 1.0
Does not look at how well the process
is centered in the specification range
Often a target value of Cp = 1.33 is used
to allow for off-center processes
Six Sigma quality requires a Cp = 2.0
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. S6 – 54
55. Process Capability Ratio
Insurance claims process
Process mean x = 210.0 minutes
Process standard deviation σ = .516 minutes
Design specification = 210 ± 3 minutes
Upper Specification - Lower Specification
Cp =
6σ
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. S6 – 55
56. Process Capability Ratio
Insurance claims process
Process mean x = 210.0 minutes
Process standard deviation σ = .516 minutes
Design specification = 210 ± 3 minutes
Upper Specification - Lower Specification
Cp =
6σ
213 - 207
= = 1.938
6(.516)
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. S6 – 56
57. Process Capability Ratio
Insurance claims process
Process mean x = 210.0 minutes
Process standard deviation σ = .516 minutes
Design specification = 210 ± 3 minutes
Upper Specification - Lower Specification
Cp =
6σ
213 - 207
= = 1.938 Process is
6(.516) capable
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. S6 – 57
58. Process Capability Index
Upper Lower
Cpk = minimum of Specification - x , x - Specification
Limit Limit
3σ 3σ
A capable process must have a Cpk of at
least 1.0
A capable process is not necessarily in the
center of the specification, but it falls within
the specification limit at both extremes
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. S6 – 58
59. Process Capability Index
New Cutting Machine
New process mean x = .250 inches
Process standard deviation σ = .0005 inches
Upper Specification Limit = .251 inches
Lower Specification Limit = .249 inches
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. S6 – 59
60. Process Capability Index
New Cutting Machine
New process mean x = .250 inches
Process standard deviation σ = .0005 inches
Upper Specification Limit = .251 inches
Lower Specification Limit = .249 inches
(.251) - .250
Cpk = minimum of ,
(3).0005
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. S6 – 60
61. Process Capability Index
New Cutting Machine
New process mean x = .250 inches
Process standard deviation σ = .0005 inches
Upper Specification Limit = .251 inches
Lower Specification Limit = .249 inches
(.251) - .250 .250 - (.249)
Cpk = minimum of ,
(3).0005 (3).0005
Both calculations result in
New machine is
.001
Cpk = = 0.67 NOT capable
.0015
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. S6 – 61
62. Interpreting Cpk
Cpk = negative number
Cpk = zero
Cpk = between 0 and 1
Cpk = 1
Cpk > 1
Figure S6.8
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. S6 – 62
63. Acceptance Sampling
Form of quality testing used for
incoming materials or finished goods
Take samples at random from a lot
(shipment) of items
Inspect each of the items in the sample
Decide whether to reject the whole lot
based on the inspection results
Only screens lots; does not drive
quality improvement efforts
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. S6 – 63
64. Acceptance Sampling
Form of quality testing used for
incoming materials or finished goods
Take samples at random from a lot
Rejected lots can be:
(shipment) of items
Inspect each of theReturnedthethe
items in to sample
supplier
Decide whether to reject the whole lot
Culled for
based on the inspection results
defectives
Only screens lots; does not drive
(100% inspection)
quality improvement efforts
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. S6 – 64
65. Operating Characteristic
Curve
Shows how well a sampling plan
discriminates between good and
bad lots (shipments)
Shows the relationship between
the probability of accepting a lot
and its quality level
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. S6 – 65
66. The “Perfect” OC Curve
Keep whole
shipment
P(Accept Whole Shipment)
100 –
75 –
Return whole
50 – shipment
25 –
Cut-Off
0 –
| | | | | | | | | | |
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
% Defective in Lot
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. S6 – 66
67. An OC Curve
Figure S6.9
100 –
95 – α = 0.05 producer’s risk for AQL
75 –
Probability
of 50 –
Acceptance
25 –
10 –
β = 0.10 0 |– | | | | | | | | Percent
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 defective
AQL LTPD
Consumer’s
risk for LTPD Good Indifference
Bad lots
lots zone
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. S6 – 67
68. AQL and LTPD
Acceptable Quality Level (AQL)
Poorest level of quality we are
willing to accept
Lot Tolerance Percent Defective
(LTPD)
Quality level we consider bad
Consumer (buyer) does not want to
accept lots with more defects than
LTPD
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. S6 – 68
69. Producer’s and Consumer’s
Risks
Producer's risk (α )
Probability of rejecting a good lot
Probability of rejecting a lot when the
fraction defective is at or above the
AQL
Consumer's risk (β )
Probability of accepting a bad lot
Probability of accepting a lot when
fraction defective is below the LTPD
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. S6 – 69
70. OC Curves for Different
Sampling Plans
n = 50, c = 1
n = 100, c = 2
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. S6 – 70
71. Average Outgoing Quality
(Pd)(Pa)(N - n)
AOQ =
N
where
Pd = true percent defective of the lot
Pa = probability of accepting the lot
N = number of items in the lot
n = number of items in the sample
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. S6 – 71
72. Average Outgoing Quality
1. If a sampling plan replaces all defectives
2. If we know the incoming percent
defective for the lot
We can compute the average outgoing
quality (AOQ) in percent defective
The maximum AOQ is the highest percent
defective or the lowest average quality
and is called the average outgoing quality
level (AOQL)
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. S6 – 72
73. Automated Inspection
Modern
technologies
allow virtually
100%
inspection at
minimal costs
Not suitable
for all
situations
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. S6 – 73
74. SPC and Process Variability
Lower Upper
specification specification
limit limit
(a) Acceptance
sampling (Some
bad units accepted)
(b) Statistical process
control (Keep the
process in control)
(c) Cpk >1 (Design
a process that
is in control)
Process mean, µ Figure S6.10
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. S6 – 74
Editor's Notes Points which might be emphasized include: - Statistical process control measures the performance of a process, it does not help to identify a particular specimen produced as being “good” or “bad,” in or out of tolerance. - Statistical process control requires the collection and analysis of data - therefore it is not helpful when total production consists of a small number of units - While statistical process control can not help identify a “good” or “bad” unit, it can enable one to decide whether or not to accept an entire production lot. If a sample of a production lot contains more than a specified number of defective items, statistical process control can give us a basis for rejecting the entire lot. The issue of rejecting a lot which was actually good can be raised here, but is probably better left to later. Students should understand both the concepts of natural and assignable variation, and the nature of the efforts required to deal with them. This slide helps introduce different process outputs. It can also be used to illustrate natural and assignable variation. Once the categories are outlined, students may be asked to provide examples of items for which variable or attribute inspection might be appropriate. They might also be asked to provide examples of products for which both characteristics might be important at different stages of the production process. This slide introduces the difference between “natural” and “assignable” causes. The next several slides expand the discussion and introduce some of the statistical issues. It may be useful to spend some time explicitly discussing the difference between the sampling distribution of the means and the mean of the process population. Instructors may wish to point out the calculation of the standard deviation reflects the binomial distribution of the population There is always a focus on finding and eliminating problems. But control charts find any process changed, good or bad. The clever company will be looking at Operator 3 and 19 as they reported no errors during this period. The company should find out why (find the assignable cause) and see if there are skills or processes that can be applied to the other operators. Instructors may wish to point out the calculation of the standard deviation reflects the Poisson distribution of the population where the standard deviation equals the square root of the mean Ask the students to imagine a product, and consider what problem might cause each of the graph configurations illustrated. Ask the students to imagine a product, and consider what problem might cause each of the graph configurations illustrated. Ask the students to imagine a product, and consider what problem might cause each of the graph configurations illustrated. Ask the students to imagine a product, and consider what problem might cause each of the graph configurations illustrated. Ask the students to imagine a product, and consider what problem might cause each of the graph configurations illustrated. Ask the students to imagine a product, and consider what problem might cause each of the graph configurations illustrated. Here again it is useful to stress that acceptance sampling relates to the aggregate, not the individual unit. You might also discuss the decision as to whether one should take only a single sample, or whether multiple samples are required. Here again it is useful to stress that acceptance sampling relates to the aggregate, not the individual unit. You might also discuss the decision as to whether one should take only a single sample, or whether multiple samples are required. You can use this and the next several slides to begin a discussion of the “quality” of the acceptance sampling plans. You will find additional slides on “consumer’s” and “producer’s” risk to pursue the issue in a more formal manner in subsequent slides. Once the students understand the definition of these terms, have them consider how one would go about choosing values for AQL and LTPD. This slide introduces the concept of “producer’s” risk and “consumer’s” risk. The following slide explores these concepts graphically. This slide presents the OC curve for two possible acceptance sampling plans. It is probably important to stress that AOQ is the average percent defective , not the average percent acceptable. It is probably important to stress that AOQ is the average percent defective , not the average percent acceptable. This may be a good time to stress that an overall goal of statistical process control is to “do it better,” i.e., improve over time.