SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 74
Operations
             Management
               Supplement 6 –
               Statistical Process
               Control
                             PowerPoint presentation to accompany
                             Heizer/Render
                             Principles of Operations Management, 7e
                             Operations Management, 9e
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.                                             S6 – 1
Outline
             Statistical Process Control (SPC)
                          Control Charts for Variables
                          The Central Limit Theorem
                          Setting Mean Chart Limits (x-Charts)
                          Setting Range Chart Limits (R-Charts)
                          Using Mean and Range Charts
                          Control Charts for Attributes
                          Managerial Issues and Control Charts

© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.                                         S6 – 2
Outline – Continued

                      Process Capability
                              Process Capability Ratio (Cp)
                              Process Capability Index (Cpk )
                      Acceptance Sampling
                              Operating Characteristic Curve
                              Average Outgoing Quality


© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.                                       S6 – 3
Learning Objectives
             When you complete this supplement
             you should be able to:

                        1. Explain the use of a control chart
                        2. Explain the role of the central limit
                           theorem in SPC
                        3. Build x-charts and R-charts
                        4. List the five steps involved in
                           building control charts

© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.                                         S6 – 4
Learning Objectives
             When you complete this supplement
             you should be able to:

                             5. Build p-charts and c-charts
                             6. Explain process capability and
                                compute Cp and Cpk
                             7. Explain acceptance sampling
                             8. Compute the AOQ


© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.                                       S6 – 5
Statistical Process Control
                             (SPC)
          Variability is inherent
           in every process
                       Natural or common
                        causes
                       Special or assignable causes
          Provides a statistical signal when
           assignable causes are present
          Detect and eliminate assignable
           causes of variation
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.                             S6 – 6
Natural Variations
               Also called common causes
               Affect virtually all production processes
               Expected amount of variation
               Output measures follow a probability
                distribution
               For any distribution there is a measure
                of central tendency and dispersion
               If the distribution of outputs falls within
                acceptable limits, the process is said to
                be “in control”
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.                                    S6 – 7
Assignable Variations
             Also called special causes of variation
                          Generally this is some change in the process
             Variations that can be traced to a specific
              reason
             The objective is to discover when
              assignable causes are present
                          Eliminate the bad causes
                          Incorporate the good causes


© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.                                                S6 – 8
Samples
               To measure the process, we take samples
               and analyze the sample statistics following
               these steps
                                                                   Each of these
                                                                  represents one
            (a) Samples of the                                     sample of five
                product, say five                                 boxes of cereal
                boxes of cereal
                taken off the filling
                                        Frequency
                                                                # #

                machine line, vary                              # # #
                from each other in                            # # # #
                weight                                      # # # # # # #

                                                      #   # # # # # # # # #


             Figure S6.1                            Weight
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.                                                     S6 – 9
Samples
               To measure the process, we take samples
               and analyze the sample statistics following
               these steps
                                                         The solid line
                                                        represents the
            (b) After enough                              distribution
                samples are
                taken from a
                stable process,
                they form a        Frequency
                pattern called a
                distribution

             Figure S6.1                       Weight
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.                                           S6 – 10
Samples
               To measure the process, we take samples
               and analyze the sample statistics following
               these steps
            (c) There are many types of distributions, including
                the normal (bell-shaped) distribution, but
                distributions do differ in terms of central
                tendency (mean), standard deviation or
                variance, and shape                         Figure S6.1
                   Frequency




                               Central tendency      Variation       Shape



                               Weight             Weight         Weight
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.                                                   S6 – 11
Samples
               To measure the process, we take samples
               and analyze the sample statistics following
               these steps
            (d) If only natural
                causes of
                variation are       Frequency
                present, the                                      Prediction
                output of a
                process forms a
                distribution that                        Tim
                                                             e
                is stable over                  Weight
                time and is                                      Figure S6.1
                predictable
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.                                               S6 – 12
Samples
               To measure the process, we take samples
               and analyze the sample statistics following
               these steps
                                                                          ?
                                                                        ? ??
                                                                         ?
            (e) If assignable                                         ?
                                                                       ?    ?
                                                                             ?
                causes are                                          ?
                                                                     ?        ?
                                                                               ?
                                                                  ??            ?
                                                                                ??
                present, the        Frequency
                                                                 ?

                process output is                                    Prediction
                not stable over
                time and is not
                predicable                               Tim
                                                             e
                                                Weight
                                                                  Figure S6.1


© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.                                                    S6 – 13
Control Charts
              Constructed from historical data, the
              purpose of control charts is to help
              distinguish between natural variations
              and variations due to assignable
              causes




© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.                             S6 – 14
Process Control
                                                   (a) In statistical
                                                   control and capable
                                                   of producing within
                                Frequency          control limits

       Lower control limit                        Upper control limit
                                              (b) In statistical
                                              control but not
                                              capable of producing
                                              within control limits



                                            (c) Out of control

                         Size
    (weight, length, speed, etc.)                                Figure S6.2

© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.                                                 S6 – 15
Types of Data
                         Variables         Attributes
       Characteristics that          Defect-related
        can take any real              characteristics
        value                         Classify products
       May be in whole or             as either good or
        in fractional                  bad or count
        numbers                        defects
       Continuous random             Categorical or
        variables                      discrete random
                                       variables
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.                                 S6 – 16
Central Limit Theorem
             Regardless of the distribution of the
             population, the distribution of sample means
             drawn from the population will tend to follow
             a normal curve
                  1. The mean of the sampling
                     distribution (x) will be the same    x=µ
                     as the population mean µ
                  2. The standard deviation of the
                     sampling distribution (σ x) will
                                                                σ
                     equal the population standard       σx =
                                                                 n
                     deviation (σ ) divided by the
                     square root of the sample size, n
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.                                           S6 – 17
Population and Sampling
                          Distributions
               Three population                        Distribution of
                 distributions                         sample means
                                                                     Mean of sample means = x
                             Beta
                                                                           Standard
                                                                           deviation of        σ
                                                                           the sample   = σx =
                             Normal                                                             n
                                                                           means

                             Uniform

                                        |      |        |      |      |        |   |

                                       -3σ x -2σ x    -1σ x   x    +1σ x +2σ x +3σ x
                                                   95.45% fall within ± 2σ x
                                                       99.73% of all x
                                                       fall within ± 3σ x                Figure S6.3

© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.                                                                      S6 – 18
Sampling Distribution
                                              Sampling
                                              distribution
                                              of means


                                                   Process
                                                   distribution
                                                   of means




                                      x=µ
                                     (mean)
                                                       Figure S6.4

© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.                                           S6 – 19
Control Charts for Variables
          For variables that have
           continuous dimensions
                       Weight, speed, length,
                        strength, etc.
          x-charts are to control
           the central tendency of the process
          R-charts are to control the dispersion of
           the process
          These two charts must be used together

© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.                             S6 – 20
Setting Chart Limits
          For x-Charts when we know σ
                             Upper control limit (UCL) = x + zσ x
                             Lower control limit (LCL) = x - zσ x
          where                    x     =     mean of the sample means
                                   or a target value set for the process
                                   z     =     number of normal standard
                                   deviations
                                   σx =        standard deviation of the
                                   sample means
                                         =     σ/ n
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.
                                   σ     =     population standard         S6 – 21
Setting Control Limits
                   Hour 1                   Hour   Mean     Hour   Mean
              Sample   Weight of             1     16.1       7    15.2
              Number   Oat Flakes            2     16.8       8    16.4
                1          17                3     15.5       9    16.3
                2          13                4     16.5      10    14.8
                3          16                5     16.5      11    14.2
                4          18                6     16.4      12    17.3
          n=9   5          17
                6          16             For 99.73% control limits, z = 3
                7          15
                8          17          UCLx = x + zσ x = 16 + 3(1/3) = 17 ozs
                9          16
                    Mean 16.1          LCLx = x - zσ x = 16 - 3(1/3) = 15 ozs
               σ=    1
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.                                                 S6 – 22
Setting Control Limits
                              Control Chart
                              for sample of                        Variation due
                                              Out of               to assignable
                              9 boxes         control                     causes

               17 = UCL

                                                                    Variation due to
            16 = Mean                                               natural causes

               15 = LCL

                                                                    Variation due
                               | | | | | | | | | | | |
                                                                    to assignable
                               1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12   Out of         causes
                                      Sample number         control



© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.                                                          S6 – 23
Setting Chart Limits
          For x-Charts when we don’t know σ

                             Upper control limit (UCL) = x + A2R
                             Lower control limit (LCL) = x - A2R

           where                   R    =       average range of the
                                   samples
                                   A2 =         control chart factor found in
                                   Table S6.1
                                   x    =       mean of the sample means
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.                                                  S6 – 24
Control Chart Factors
                Sample Size      Mean Factor   Upper Range   Lower
                Range
                    n                 A2            D4           D3
                     2              1.880         3.268            0
                     3              1.023         2.574            0
                     4               .729         2.282            0
                     5               .577         2.115            0
                     6               .483         2.004            0
                     7               .419         1.924        0.076
                     8               .373         1.864        0.136
                     9               .337         1.816        0.184
                    10               .308         1.777        0.223
                    12               .266         1.716        0.284
                                                                 Table S6.1
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.                                                    S6 – 25
Setting Control Limits
                              Process average x = 12 ounces
                              Average range R = .25
                              Sample size n = 5




© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.                                    S6 – 26
Setting Control Limits
                              Process average x = 12 ounces
                              Average range R = .25
                              Sample size n = 5

             UCLx            = x + A2R
                             = 12 + (.577)(.25)
                             = 12 + .144
                             = 12.144 ounces
                                                    From
                                                  Table S6.1



© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.                                     S6 – 27
Setting Control Limits
                              Process average x = 12 ounces
                              Average range R = .25
                              Sample size n = 5

             UCLx            = x + A2R                  UCL = 12.144
                             = 12 + (.577)(.25)
                             = 12 + .144                Mean = 12
                             = 12.144 ounces

             LCLx            = x - A2R                  LCL = 11.857

                             = 12 - .144
                             = 11.857 ounces
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.                                             S6 – 28
R – Chart

                    Type of variables control chart
                    Shows sample ranges over time
                              Difference between smallest and
                               largest values in sample
                    Monitors process variability
                    Independent from process mean


© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.                                       S6 – 29
Setting Chart Limits
           For R-Charts

                             Upper control limit (UCLR) = D4R
                             Lower control limit (LCLR) = D3R

           where
                                  R    =     average range of the
                                  samples
                                  D3 and D4 =      control chart factors
                                  from Table S6.1

© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.                                                 S6 – 30
Setting Control Limits
                              Average range R = 5.3 pounds
                              Sample size n = 5
                              From Table S6.1 D4 = 2.115, D3 = 0

                  UCLR = D4R                              UCL = 11.2
                       = (2.115)(5.3)
                       = 11.2 pounds                      Mean = 5.3



                  LCLR        = D3 R                      LCL = 0

                              = (0)(5.3)
                              = 0 pounds
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.                                             S6 – 31
Mean and Range Charts
          (a)
          These                          (Sampling mean is
          sampling                       shifting upward but
          distributions                  range is consistent)
          result in the
          charts below

                             UCL
                                          (x-chart detects
                  x-chart                 shift in central
                                          tendency)
                             LCL
                             UCL
                                          (R-chart does not
                  R-chart                 detect change in
                                          mean)
                             LCL
   Figure S6.5
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.                                   S6 – 32
Mean and Range Charts
          (b)
          These
                                         (Sampling mean
          sampling
                                         is constant but
          distributions
                                         dispersion is
          result in the
                                         increasing)
          charts below

                             UCL
                                         (x-chart does not
                  x-chart                detect the increase
                                         in dispersion)
                             LCL
                             UCL
                                         (R-chart detects
                  R-chart                increase in
                                         dispersion)
                             LCL
   Figure S6.5
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.                                  S6 – 33
Steps In Creating Control
                              Charts
               1. Take samples from the population and
                  compute the appropriate sample statistic
               2. Use the sample statistic to calculate control
                  limits and draw the control chart
               3. Plot sample results on the control chart and
                  determine the state of the process (in or out of
                  control)
               4. Investigate possible assignable causes and
                  take any indicated actions
               5. Continue sampling from the process and reset
                  the control limits when necessary
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.                                           S6 – 34
Manual and Automated
                                Control Charts




© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.                          S6 – 35
Control Charts for Attributes
                 For variables that are categorical
                              Good/bad, yes/no,
                               acceptable/unacceptable
                 Measurement is typically counting
                  defectives
                 Charts may measure
                              Percent defective (p-chart)
                              Number of defects (c-chart)
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.                                   S6 – 36
Control Limits for p-Charts
                   Population will be a binomial distribution,
                    but applying the Central Limit Theorem
                   allows us to assume a normal distribution
                            for the sample statistics

                              UCLp = p + zσ p
                                            ^
                                                                    p(1 - p)
                                                           σp =
                                                             ^
                                                                       n
                              LCLp = p - zσ p
                                            ^


p                =            mean fraction defective in the sample
z                =            number of standard deviations
σp               =            standard deviation of the sampling distribution
                                ^


n                =            sample size
 © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.                                                     S6 – 37
p-Chart for Data Entry
                 Sample Number      Fraction    Sample Number      Fraction
                 Number of Errors   Defective   Number of Errors   Defective
                      1         6        .06      11          6       .06
                      2         5        .05      12          1       .01
                      3         0        .00      13          8       .08
                      4         1        .01      14          7       .07
                      5         4        .04      15          5       .05
                      6         2        .02      16          4       .04
                      7         5        .05      17        11        .11
                      8         3        .03      18          3       .03
                      9         3        .03      19          0       .00
                     10         2        .02      20          4       .04
                                                     Total = 80
                          80                            (.04)(1 - .04)
                    p=           = .04          σp =                   = .02
                       (100)(20)                 ^
                                                             100
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.                                                     S6 – 38
p-Chart for Data Entry
                                             UCLp = p + zσ p = .04 + 3(.02) = .10
                                                           ^


                                                 LCLp = p - zσ p = .04 - 3(.02) = 0
                                                               ^


                                       .11   –
                                       .10   –                                                     UCLp = 0.10
                                       .09   –
                  Fraction defective




                                       .08   –
                                       .07   –
                                       .06   –
                                       .05   –
                                       .04   –                                                     p = 0.04
                                       .03   –
                                       .02   –
                                       .01   –                                                     LCLp = 0.00
                                       .00   –    |   |   |      |   |    |    |    |    |    |
                                                  2   4   6     8    10   12   14   16   18   20
                                                              Sample number
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.                                                                                       S6 – 39
p-Chart for Data Entry
                                             UCLp = p + zσ p = .04 + 3(.02) = .10
                                                           ^
                                                                                 Possible
                                                 LCLp = p - zσ p = .04 - 3(.02) = 0
                                                               ^                assignable
                                                                              causes present
                                       .11   –
                                       .10   –                                                     UCLp = 0.10
                                       .09   –
                  Fraction defective




                                       .08   –
                                       .07   –
                                       .06   –
                                       .05   –
                                       .04   –                                                     p = 0.04
                                       .03   –
                                       .02   –
                                       .01   –                                                     LCLp = 0.00
                                       .00   –    |   |   |      |   |    |    |    |    |    |
                                                  2   4   6     8    10   12   14   16   18   20
                                                              Sample number
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.                                                                                       S6 – 40
Control Limits for c-Charts
                  Population will be a Poisson distribution,
                   but applying the Central Limit Theorem
                  allows us to assume a normal distribution
                           for the sample statistics


                             UCLc = c + 3 c          LCLc = c - 3 c


       c                     =   mean number defective in the sample



© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.                                             S6 – 41
c-Chart for Cab Company
              c = 54 complaints/9 days = 6 complaints/day

              UCLc = c + 3 c                 14     –
                                                                                UCLc = 13.35
                                             14




                                 Number defective
                   =6+3 6                    12     –
                   = 13.35                   10     –
                                              8     –
                                              6     –                                  c= 6
               LCLc = c - 3 c                 4     –
                    =6-3 6                    2     –                               LCLc = 0
                                              0     – | |   | |    |    |   |    | |
                    =0                                1 2   3 4    5    6   7    8 9
                                                                  Day

© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.                                                                 S6 – 42
Managerial Issues and
                                Control Charts
            Three major management decisions:

                         Select points in the processes that
                          need SPC
                         Determine the appropriate charting
                          technique
                         Set clear policies and procedures


© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.                                      S6 – 43
Which Control Chart to Use
         Variables Data
            Using an x-chart and R-chart:
                          Observations are variables
                          Collect 20 - 25 samples of n = 4, or n =
                           5, or more, each from a stable process
                           and compute the mean for the x-chart
                           and range for the R-chart
                          Track samples of n observations each


© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.                                            S6 – 44
Which Control Chart to Use
         Attribute Data
            Using the p-chart:
                          Observations are attributes that can
                           be categorized in two states
                          We deal with fraction, proportion, or
                           percent defectives
                          Have several samples, each with
                           many observations



© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.                                         S6 – 45
Which Control Chart to Use
         Attribute Data
            Using a c-Chart:
                          Observations are attributes whose
                           defects per unit of output can be
                           counted
                          The number counted is a small part of
                           the possible occurrences
                          Defects such as number of blemishes
                           on a desk, number of typos in a page
                           of text, flaws in a bolt of cloth

© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.                                         S6 – 46
Patterns in Control Charts

                       Upper control limit



                                   Target



                       Lower control limit
                                             Normal behavior.
                                             Process is “in control.”
               Figure S6.7


© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.                                              S6 – 47
Patterns in Control Charts

                       Upper control limit



                                   Target



                       Lower control limit
                                             One plot out above (or
                                             below). Investigate for
               Figure S6.7                   cause. Process is “out
                                             of control.”
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.                                             S6 – 48
Patterns in Control Charts

                       Upper control limit



                                   Target



                       Lower control limit
                                             Trends in either
                                             direction, 5 plots.
               Figure S6.7                   Investigate for cause of
                                             progressive change.
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.                                              S6 – 49
Patterns in Control Charts

                       Upper control limit



                                   Target



                       Lower control limit
                                             Two plots very near
                                             lower (or upper)
               Figure S6.7                   control. Investigate for
                                             cause.
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.                                              S6 – 50
Patterns in Control Charts

                       Upper control limit



                                   Target



                       Lower control limit
                                             Run of 5 above (or
                                             below) central line.
               Figure S6.7                   Investigate for cause.

© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.                                            S6 – 51
Patterns in Control Charts

                       Upper control limit



                                   Target



                       Lower control limit
                                             Erratic behavior.
                                             Investigate.
               Figure S6.7


© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.                                       S6 – 52
Process Capability
                The natural variation of a process
                 should be small enough to produce
                 products that meet the standards
                 required
                A process in statistical control does not
                 necessarily meet the design
                 specifications
                Process capability is a measure of the
                 relationship between the natural
                 variation of the process and the design
                 specifications
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.                                   S6 – 53
Process Capability Ratio
               Upper Specification - Lower Specification
          Cp =
                                  6σ
                 A capable process must have a Cp of at
                  least 1.0
                 Does not look at how well the process
                  is centered in the specification range
                 Often a target value of Cp = 1.33 is used
                  to allow for off-center processes
                 Six Sigma quality requires a Cp = 2.0
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.                                    S6 – 54
Process Capability Ratio
            Insurance claims process

                        Process mean x = 210.0 minutes
                        Process standard deviation σ = .516 minutes
                        Design specification = 210 ± 3 minutes

                          Upper Specification - Lower Specification
                     Cp =
                                             6σ




© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.                                            S6 – 55
Process Capability Ratio
            Insurance claims process

                        Process mean x = 210.0 minutes
                        Process standard deviation σ = .516 minutes
                        Design specification = 210 ± 3 minutes

                          Upper Specification - Lower Specification
                     Cp =
                                             6σ
                          213 - 207
                        =           = 1.938
                           6(.516)


© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.                                            S6 – 56
Process Capability Ratio
            Insurance claims process

                        Process mean x = 210.0 minutes
                        Process standard deviation σ = .516 minutes
                        Design specification = 210 ± 3 minutes

                          Upper Specification - Lower Specification
                     Cp =
                                             6σ
                          213 - 207
                        =           = 1.938        Process is
                           6(.516)                  capable

© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.                                            S6 – 57
Process Capability Index

                           Upper                   Lower
          Cpk = minimum of Specification - x , x - Specification
                           Limit                   Limit
                            3σ                    3σ

         A capable process must have a Cpk of at
          least 1.0
         A capable process is not necessarily in the
          center of the specification, but it falls within
          the specification limit at both extremes
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.                                    S6 – 58
Process Capability Index
            New Cutting Machine
                        New process mean x = .250 inches
                        Process standard deviation σ = .0005 inches
                        Upper Specification Limit = .251 inches
                        Lower Specification Limit = .249 inches




© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.                                            S6 – 59
Process Capability Index
            New Cutting Machine
                        New process mean x = .250 inches
                        Process standard deviation σ = .0005 inches
                        Upper Specification Limit = .251 inches
                        Lower Specification Limit = .249 inches
                                   (.251) - .250
             Cpk = minimum of                    ,
                                     (3).0005




© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.                                            S6 – 60
Process Capability Index
            New Cutting Machine
                        New process mean x = .250 inches
                        Process standard deviation σ = .0005 inches
                        Upper Specification Limit = .251 inches
                        Lower Specification Limit = .249 inches
                                            (.251) - .250   .250 - (.249)
             Cpk = minimum of                             ,
                                              (3).0005        (3).0005

           Both calculations result in
                                                           New machine is
                              .001
             Cpk =                 = 0.67                   NOT capable
                             .0015

© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.                                                  S6 – 61
Interpreting Cpk

                   Cpk = negative number


                  Cpk = zero


                  Cpk = between 0 and 1


                  Cpk = 1


                  Cpk > 1
                                                  Figure S6.8
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.                                S6 – 62
Acceptance Sampling
          Form of quality testing used for
           incoming materials or finished goods
                       Take samples at random from a lot
                        (shipment) of items
                       Inspect each of the items in the sample
                       Decide whether to reject the whole lot
                        based on the inspection results
          Only screens lots; does not drive
           quality improvement efforts
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.                                        S6 – 63
Acceptance Sampling
          Form of quality testing used for
           incoming materials or finished goods
             Take samples at random from a lot
                               Rejected lots can be:
              (shipment) of items
             Inspect each of theReturnedthethe
                                items in to sample
                                 supplier
             Decide whether to reject the whole lot
                                Culled for
              based on the inspection results
                                 defectives
          Only screens lots; does not drive
                                 (100% inspection)
                   quality improvement efforts
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.                             S6 – 64
Operating Characteristic
                               Curve
                 Shows how well a sampling plan
                  discriminates between good and
                  bad lots (shipments)
                 Shows the relationship between
                  the probability of accepting a lot
                  and its quality level


© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.                             S6 – 65
The “Perfect” OC Curve
                                                                Keep whole
                                                                 shipment
                             P(Accept Whole Shipment)



                                                        100 –

                                                        75 –
                                                                             Return whole
                                                        50 –                  shipment

                                                        25 –
                                                                        Cut-Off
                                                         0 –
                                                           |    |   |    |    |   |   |     |   |   |   |

                                                           0    10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
                                                                        % Defective in Lot

© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.                                                                                  S6 – 66
An OC Curve
                                                                                      Figure S6.9
                             100 –
                              95 –                 α = 0.05 producer’s risk for AQL


                              75 –

        Probability
            of      50 –
        Acceptance

                              25 –

                              10 –
                 β = 0.10 0 |–         |      |    |      |    |      |    |     |        Percent
                                0      1      2    3      4    5      6    7     8       defective
                                             AQL                          LTPD
          Consumer’s
         risk for LTPD               Good              Indifference
                                                                                     Bad lots
                                      lots                 zone

© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.                                                                          S6 – 67
AQL and LTPD
                 Acceptable Quality Level (AQL)
                              Poorest level of quality we are
                               willing to accept
                 Lot Tolerance Percent Defective
                  (LTPD)
                              Quality level we consider bad
                              Consumer (buyer) does not want to
                               accept lots with more defects than
                               LTPD
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.                                          S6 – 68
Producer’s and Consumer’s
                       Risks
            Producer's risk (α )
                         Probability of rejecting a good lot
                         Probability of rejecting a lot when the
                          fraction defective is at or above the
                          AQL
            Consumer's risk (β )
                         Probability of accepting a bad lot
                         Probability of accepting a lot when
                          fraction defective is below the LTPD
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.                                          S6 – 69
OC Curves for Different
                            Sampling Plans

                                       n = 50, c = 1




                             n = 100, c = 2




© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.                             S6 – 70
Average Outgoing Quality

                                       (Pd)(Pa)(N - n)
                                 AOQ =
                                             N

                      where
                              Pd = true percent defective of the lot
                              Pa = probability of accepting the lot
                              N = number of items in the lot
                              n = number of items in the sample

© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.                                             S6 – 71
Average Outgoing Quality
             1. If a sampling plan replaces all defectives
             2. If we know the incoming percent
                defective for the lot

                     We can compute the average outgoing
                     quality (AOQ) in percent defective

                The maximum AOQ is the highest percent
                defective or the lowest average quality
                and is called the average outgoing quality
                level (AOQL)
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.                                   S6 – 72
Automated Inspection

                  Modern
                   technologies
                   allow virtually
                   100%
                   inspection at
                   minimal costs
                  Not suitable
                   for all
                   situations
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.                          S6 – 73
SPC and Process Variability
            Lower                            Upper
         specification                    specification
             limit                            limit
                                                          (a) Acceptance
                                                              sampling (Some
                                                              bad units accepted)

                                                          (b) Statistical process
                                                              control (Keep the
                                                              process in control)

                                                          (c) Cpk >1 (Design
                                                              a process that
                                                              is in control)
                             Process mean, µ                           Figure S6.10
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.                                                          S6 – 74

More Related Content

What's hot (20)

Heizer 13
Heizer 13Heizer 13
Heizer 13
 
Heizer 04
Heizer 04Heizer 04
Heizer 04
 
Heizer 07
Heizer 07Heizer 07
Heizer 07
 
Heizer 12
Heizer 12Heizer 12
Heizer 12
 
Heizer 11
Heizer 11Heizer 11
Heizer 11
 
Heizer 03
Heizer 03Heizer 03
Heizer 03
 
Heizer 14
Heizer 14Heizer 14
Heizer 14
 
Heizer 17
Heizer 17Heizer 17
Heizer 17
 
Heizer supp 07
Heizer supp 07Heizer supp 07
Heizer supp 07
 
Heizer 10
Heizer 10Heizer 10
Heizer 10
 
Heizer 11
Heizer 11Heizer 11
Heizer 11
 
Heizer supp 11
Heizer supp 11Heizer supp 11
Heizer supp 11
 
Chapter 8 Location Strategy.ppt
Chapter 8 Location Strategy.pptChapter 8 Location Strategy.ppt
Chapter 8 Location Strategy.ppt
 
Heizer om10 ch08
Heizer om10 ch08Heizer om10 ch08
Heizer om10 ch08
 
Heizer om10 ch11_r
Heizer om10 ch11_rHeizer om10 ch11_r
Heizer om10 ch11_r
 
Heizer mod c
Heizer mod cHeizer mod c
Heizer mod c
 
Heizer mod e
Heizer mod eHeizer mod e
Heizer mod e
 
Heizer mod d
Heizer mod dHeizer mod d
Heizer mod d
 
Dessler ch5
Dessler ch5Dessler ch5
Dessler ch5
 
Heizer om10 ch11
Heizer om10 ch11Heizer om10 ch11
Heizer om10 ch11
 

Similar to Heizer supp 06

supplement-6-e28093-spc.ppt- SPC_ Operation Management
supplement-6-e28093-spc.ppt- SPC_ Operation Managementsupplement-6-e28093-spc.ppt- SPC_ Operation Management
supplement-6-e28093-spc.ppt- SPC_ Operation ManagementRanjeet338208
 
Industrial Examples - Process Capability in Total Quality Management
Industrial Examples - Process Capability in Total Quality ManagementIndustrial Examples - Process Capability in Total Quality Management
Industrial Examples - Process Capability in Total Quality ManagementDr.Raja R
 
Ops A La Carte Statistical Process Control (SPC) Seminar
Ops A La Carte Statistical Process Control (SPC) SeminarOps A La Carte Statistical Process Control (SPC) Seminar
Ops A La Carte Statistical Process Control (SPC) SeminarJay Muns
 
Quality And Performance.pptx
Quality And Performance.pptxQuality And Performance.pptx
Quality And Performance.pptxOswaldo Gonzales
 
Predictive Analytics: Advanced techniques in data mining
Predictive Analytics: Advanced techniques in data miningPredictive Analytics: Advanced techniques in data mining
Predictive Analytics: Advanced techniques in data miningSAS Asia Pacific
 
NG BB 23 Measurement System Analysis - Introduction
NG BB 23 Measurement System Analysis - IntroductionNG BB 23 Measurement System Analysis - Introduction
NG BB 23 Measurement System Analysis - IntroductionLeanleaders.org
 
Reliability integration across the product life cycle
Reliability integration across the product life cycleReliability integration across the product life cycle
Reliability integration across the product life cycleAccendo Reliability
 
Harrison.g.poole.k
Harrison.g.poole.kHarrison.g.poole.k
Harrison.g.poole.kNASAPMC
 
NG BB 31 Cause and Effect (XY) Matrix
NG BB 31 Cause and Effect (XY) MatrixNG BB 31 Cause and Effect (XY) Matrix
NG BB 31 Cause and Effect (XY) MatrixLeanleaders.org
 
NG BB 31 Cause and Effect (XY) Matrix
NG BB 31 Cause and Effect (XY) MatrixNG BB 31 Cause and Effect (XY) Matrix
NG BB 31 Cause and Effect (XY) MatrixLeanleaders.org
 
NG BB 27 Process Capability
NG BB 27 Process CapabilityNG BB 27 Process Capability
NG BB 27 Process CapabilityLeanleaders.org
 
NG BB 27 Process Capability
NG BB 27 Process CapabilityNG BB 27 Process Capability
NG BB 27 Process CapabilityLeanleaders.org
 

Similar to Heizer supp 06 (20)

Qm
QmQm
Qm
 
sup06.ppt
sup06.pptsup06.ppt
sup06.ppt
 
Lean Six Sigma
Lean Six SigmaLean Six Sigma
Lean Six Sigma
 
SAP-Solution-Manager
SAP-Solution-ManagerSAP-Solution-Manager
SAP-Solution-Manager
 
supplement-6-e28093-spc.ppt- SPC_ Operation Management
supplement-6-e28093-spc.ppt- SPC_ Operation Managementsupplement-6-e28093-spc.ppt- SPC_ Operation Management
supplement-6-e28093-spc.ppt- SPC_ Operation Management
 
Industrial Examples - Process Capability in Total Quality Management
Industrial Examples - Process Capability in Total Quality ManagementIndustrial Examples - Process Capability in Total Quality Management
Industrial Examples - Process Capability in Total Quality Management
 
Ops A La Carte SPC Seminar
Ops A La Carte SPC SeminarOps A La Carte SPC Seminar
Ops A La Carte SPC Seminar
 
Ops A La Carte Statistical Process Control (SPC) Seminar
Ops A La Carte Statistical Process Control (SPC) SeminarOps A La Carte Statistical Process Control (SPC) Seminar
Ops A La Carte Statistical Process Control (SPC) Seminar
 
Zero defect
Zero defectZero defect
Zero defect
 
Quality And Performance.pptx
Quality And Performance.pptxQuality And Performance.pptx
Quality And Performance.pptx
 
Predictive Analytics: Advanced techniques in data mining
Predictive Analytics: Advanced techniques in data miningPredictive Analytics: Advanced techniques in data mining
Predictive Analytics: Advanced techniques in data mining
 
NG BB 23 Measurement System Analysis - Introduction
NG BB 23 Measurement System Analysis - IntroductionNG BB 23 Measurement System Analysis - Introduction
NG BB 23 Measurement System Analysis - Introduction
 
Reliability integration across the product life cycle
Reliability integration across the product life cycleReliability integration across the product life cycle
Reliability integration across the product life cycle
 
Why do a designed experiment
Why do a designed experimentWhy do a designed experiment
Why do a designed experiment
 
Harrison.g.poole.k
Harrison.g.poole.kHarrison.g.poole.k
Harrison.g.poole.k
 
Ebsl Technologies Six (6) Sigma
Ebsl Technologies Six (6) SigmaEbsl Technologies Six (6) Sigma
Ebsl Technologies Six (6) Sigma
 
NG BB 31 Cause and Effect (XY) Matrix
NG BB 31 Cause and Effect (XY) MatrixNG BB 31 Cause and Effect (XY) Matrix
NG BB 31 Cause and Effect (XY) Matrix
 
NG BB 31 Cause and Effect (XY) Matrix
NG BB 31 Cause and Effect (XY) MatrixNG BB 31 Cause and Effect (XY) Matrix
NG BB 31 Cause and Effect (XY) Matrix
 
NG BB 27 Process Capability
NG BB 27 Process CapabilityNG BB 27 Process Capability
NG BB 27 Process Capability
 
NG BB 27 Process Capability
NG BB 27 Process CapabilityNG BB 27 Process Capability
NG BB 27 Process Capability
 

More from Rizwan Khurram

Exploring the risk factors associated with peb projects in lahore.
Exploring the risk factors associated with peb projects in lahore.Exploring the risk factors associated with peb projects in lahore.
Exploring the risk factors associated with peb projects in lahore.Rizwan Khurram
 
Information Technology Project Management - part 11
Information Technology Project Management - part 11Information Technology Project Management - part 11
Information Technology Project Management - part 11Rizwan Khurram
 
Information Technology Project Management - part 10
Information Technology Project Management - part 10Information Technology Project Management - part 10
Information Technology Project Management - part 10Rizwan Khurram
 
Information Technology Project Management - part 09
Information Technology Project Management - part 09Information Technology Project Management - part 09
Information Technology Project Management - part 09Rizwan Khurram
 
Information Technology Project Management - part 08
Information Technology Project Management - part  08Information Technology Project Management - part  08
Information Technology Project Management - part 08Rizwan Khurram
 
Information Technology Project Management - part 07
Information Technology Project Management - part 07Information Technology Project Management - part 07
Information Technology Project Management - part 07Rizwan Khurram
 
Information Technology Project Management - part 05
Information Technology Project Management - part 05Information Technology Project Management - part 05
Information Technology Project Management - part 05Rizwan Khurram
 
Information Technology Project Management - part 04
Information Technology Project Management - part 04Information Technology Project Management - part 04
Information Technology Project Management - part 04Rizwan Khurram
 
Information Technology Project Management - part 02
Information Technology Project Management - part 02Information Technology Project Management - part 02
Information Technology Project Management - part 02Rizwan Khurram
 
Information Technology Project Management - part 01
Information Technology Project Management - part 01Information Technology Project Management - part 01
Information Technology Project Management - part 01Rizwan Khurram
 
Information Technology Project Management - part 12
Information Technology Project Management - part 12Information Technology Project Management - part 12
Information Technology Project Management - part 12Rizwan Khurram
 
Strategic Delivery of Change Management
Strategic Delivery of Change Management Strategic Delivery of Change Management
Strategic Delivery of Change Management Rizwan Khurram
 
Strategic Delivery of Change Management
Strategic Delivery of Change Management Strategic Delivery of Change Management
Strategic Delivery of Change Management Rizwan Khurram
 
Strategic Delivery of Change Management
Strategic Delivery of Change Management Strategic Delivery of Change Management
Strategic Delivery of Change Management Rizwan Khurram
 
Strategic Delivery of Change Management
Strategic Delivery of Change Management Strategic Delivery of Change Management
Strategic Delivery of Change Management Rizwan Khurram
 
Strategic Delivery of Change Management
Strategic Delivery of Change Management Strategic Delivery of Change Management
Strategic Delivery of Change Management Rizwan Khurram
 
Strategic Delivery of Change Management
Strategic Delivery of Change Management Strategic Delivery of Change Management
Strategic Delivery of Change Management Rizwan Khurram
 
Strategic Delivery of Change Management
Strategic Delivery of Change Management Strategic Delivery of Change Management
Strategic Delivery of Change Management Rizwan Khurram
 
Total employee involvement
Total employee involvementTotal employee involvement
Total employee involvementRizwan Khurram
 

More from Rizwan Khurram (20)

Exploring the risk factors associated with peb projects in lahore.
Exploring the risk factors associated with peb projects in lahore.Exploring the risk factors associated with peb projects in lahore.
Exploring the risk factors associated with peb projects in lahore.
 
Information Technology Project Management - part 11
Information Technology Project Management - part 11Information Technology Project Management - part 11
Information Technology Project Management - part 11
 
Information Technology Project Management - part 10
Information Technology Project Management - part 10Information Technology Project Management - part 10
Information Technology Project Management - part 10
 
Information Technology Project Management - part 09
Information Technology Project Management - part 09Information Technology Project Management - part 09
Information Technology Project Management - part 09
 
Information Technology Project Management - part 08
Information Technology Project Management - part  08Information Technology Project Management - part  08
Information Technology Project Management - part 08
 
Information Technology Project Management - part 07
Information Technology Project Management - part 07Information Technology Project Management - part 07
Information Technology Project Management - part 07
 
Information Technology Project Management - part 05
Information Technology Project Management - part 05Information Technology Project Management - part 05
Information Technology Project Management - part 05
 
Information Technology Project Management - part 04
Information Technology Project Management - part 04Information Technology Project Management - part 04
Information Technology Project Management - part 04
 
Information Technology Project Management - part 02
Information Technology Project Management - part 02Information Technology Project Management - part 02
Information Technology Project Management - part 02
 
Information Technology Project Management - part 01
Information Technology Project Management - part 01Information Technology Project Management - part 01
Information Technology Project Management - part 01
 
Information Technology Project Management - part 12
Information Technology Project Management - part 12Information Technology Project Management - part 12
Information Technology Project Management - part 12
 
Strategic Delivery of Change Management
Strategic Delivery of Change Management Strategic Delivery of Change Management
Strategic Delivery of Change Management
 
Strategic Delivery of Change Management
Strategic Delivery of Change Management Strategic Delivery of Change Management
Strategic Delivery of Change Management
 
Strategic Delivery of Change Management
Strategic Delivery of Change Management Strategic Delivery of Change Management
Strategic Delivery of Change Management
 
Strategic Delivery of Change Management
Strategic Delivery of Change Management Strategic Delivery of Change Management
Strategic Delivery of Change Management
 
Strategic Delivery of Change Management
Strategic Delivery of Change Management Strategic Delivery of Change Management
Strategic Delivery of Change Management
 
Strategic Delivery of Change Management
Strategic Delivery of Change Management Strategic Delivery of Change Management
Strategic Delivery of Change Management
 
Strategic Delivery of Change Management
Strategic Delivery of Change Management Strategic Delivery of Change Management
Strategic Delivery of Change Management
 
Vision and mission
Vision and missionVision and mission
Vision and mission
 
Total employee involvement
Total employee involvementTotal employee involvement
Total employee involvement
 

Heizer supp 06

  • 1. Operations Management Supplement 6 – Statistical Process Control PowerPoint presentation to accompany Heizer/Render Principles of Operations Management, 7e Operations Management, 9e © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. S6 – 1
  • 2. Outline  Statistical Process Control (SPC)  Control Charts for Variables  The Central Limit Theorem  Setting Mean Chart Limits (x-Charts)  Setting Range Chart Limits (R-Charts)  Using Mean and Range Charts  Control Charts for Attributes  Managerial Issues and Control Charts © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. S6 – 2
  • 3. Outline – Continued  Process Capability  Process Capability Ratio (Cp)  Process Capability Index (Cpk )  Acceptance Sampling  Operating Characteristic Curve  Average Outgoing Quality © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. S6 – 3
  • 4. Learning Objectives When you complete this supplement you should be able to: 1. Explain the use of a control chart 2. Explain the role of the central limit theorem in SPC 3. Build x-charts and R-charts 4. List the five steps involved in building control charts © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. S6 – 4
  • 5. Learning Objectives When you complete this supplement you should be able to: 5. Build p-charts and c-charts 6. Explain process capability and compute Cp and Cpk 7. Explain acceptance sampling 8. Compute the AOQ © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. S6 – 5
  • 6. Statistical Process Control (SPC)  Variability is inherent in every process  Natural or common causes  Special or assignable causes  Provides a statistical signal when assignable causes are present  Detect and eliminate assignable causes of variation © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. S6 – 6
  • 7. Natural Variations  Also called common causes  Affect virtually all production processes  Expected amount of variation  Output measures follow a probability distribution  For any distribution there is a measure of central tendency and dispersion  If the distribution of outputs falls within acceptable limits, the process is said to be “in control” © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. S6 – 7
  • 8. Assignable Variations  Also called special causes of variation  Generally this is some change in the process  Variations that can be traced to a specific reason  The objective is to discover when assignable causes are present  Eliminate the bad causes  Incorporate the good causes © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. S6 – 8
  • 9. Samples To measure the process, we take samples and analyze the sample statistics following these steps Each of these represents one (a) Samples of the sample of five product, say five boxes of cereal boxes of cereal taken off the filling Frequency # # machine line, vary # # # from each other in # # # # weight # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # # Figure S6.1 Weight © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. S6 – 9
  • 10. Samples To measure the process, we take samples and analyze the sample statistics following these steps The solid line represents the (b) After enough distribution samples are taken from a stable process, they form a Frequency pattern called a distribution Figure S6.1 Weight © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. S6 – 10
  • 11. Samples To measure the process, we take samples and analyze the sample statistics following these steps (c) There are many types of distributions, including the normal (bell-shaped) distribution, but distributions do differ in terms of central tendency (mean), standard deviation or variance, and shape Figure S6.1 Frequency Central tendency Variation Shape Weight Weight Weight © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. S6 – 11
  • 12. Samples To measure the process, we take samples and analyze the sample statistics following these steps (d) If only natural causes of variation are Frequency present, the Prediction output of a process forms a distribution that Tim e is stable over Weight time and is Figure S6.1 predictable © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. S6 – 12
  • 13. Samples To measure the process, we take samples and analyze the sample statistics following these steps ? ? ?? ? (e) If assignable ? ? ? ? causes are ? ? ? ? ?? ? ?? present, the Frequency ? process output is Prediction not stable over time and is not predicable Tim e Weight Figure S6.1 © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. S6 – 13
  • 14. Control Charts Constructed from historical data, the purpose of control charts is to help distinguish between natural variations and variations due to assignable causes © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. S6 – 14
  • 15. Process Control (a) In statistical control and capable of producing within Frequency control limits Lower control limit Upper control limit (b) In statistical control but not capable of producing within control limits (c) Out of control Size (weight, length, speed, etc.) Figure S6.2 © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. S6 – 15
  • 16. Types of Data Variables Attributes  Characteristics that  Defect-related can take any real characteristics value  Classify products  May be in whole or as either good or in fractional bad or count numbers defects  Continuous random  Categorical or variables discrete random variables © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. S6 – 16
  • 17. Central Limit Theorem Regardless of the distribution of the population, the distribution of sample means drawn from the population will tend to follow a normal curve 1. The mean of the sampling distribution (x) will be the same x=µ as the population mean µ 2. The standard deviation of the sampling distribution (σ x) will σ equal the population standard σx = n deviation (σ ) divided by the square root of the sample size, n © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. S6 – 17
  • 18. Population and Sampling Distributions Three population Distribution of distributions sample means Mean of sample means = x Beta Standard deviation of σ the sample = σx = Normal n means Uniform | | | | | | | -3σ x -2σ x -1σ x x +1σ x +2σ x +3σ x 95.45% fall within ± 2σ x 99.73% of all x fall within ± 3σ x Figure S6.3 © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. S6 – 18
  • 19. Sampling Distribution Sampling distribution of means Process distribution of means x=µ (mean) Figure S6.4 © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. S6 – 19
  • 20. Control Charts for Variables  For variables that have continuous dimensions  Weight, speed, length, strength, etc.  x-charts are to control the central tendency of the process  R-charts are to control the dispersion of the process  These two charts must be used together © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. S6 – 20
  • 21. Setting Chart Limits For x-Charts when we know σ Upper control limit (UCL) = x + zσ x Lower control limit (LCL) = x - zσ x where x = mean of the sample means or a target value set for the process z = number of normal standard deviations σx = standard deviation of the sample means = σ/ n © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. σ = population standard S6 – 21
  • 22. Setting Control Limits Hour 1 Hour Mean Hour Mean Sample Weight of 1 16.1 7 15.2 Number Oat Flakes 2 16.8 8 16.4 1 17 3 15.5 9 16.3 2 13 4 16.5 10 14.8 3 16 5 16.5 11 14.2 4 18 6 16.4 12 17.3 n=9 5 17 6 16 For 99.73% control limits, z = 3 7 15 8 17 UCLx = x + zσ x = 16 + 3(1/3) = 17 ozs 9 16 Mean 16.1 LCLx = x - zσ x = 16 - 3(1/3) = 15 ozs σ= 1 © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. S6 – 22
  • 23. Setting Control Limits Control Chart for sample of Variation due Out of to assignable 9 boxes control causes 17 = UCL Variation due to 16 = Mean natural causes 15 = LCL Variation due | | | | | | | | | | | | to assignable 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Out of causes Sample number control © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. S6 – 23
  • 24. Setting Chart Limits For x-Charts when we don’t know σ Upper control limit (UCL) = x + A2R Lower control limit (LCL) = x - A2R where R = average range of the samples A2 = control chart factor found in Table S6.1 x = mean of the sample means © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. S6 – 24
  • 25. Control Chart Factors Sample Size Mean Factor Upper Range Lower Range n A2 D4 D3 2 1.880 3.268 0 3 1.023 2.574 0 4 .729 2.282 0 5 .577 2.115 0 6 .483 2.004 0 7 .419 1.924 0.076 8 .373 1.864 0.136 9 .337 1.816 0.184 10 .308 1.777 0.223 12 .266 1.716 0.284 Table S6.1 © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. S6 – 25
  • 26. Setting Control Limits Process average x = 12 ounces Average range R = .25 Sample size n = 5 © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. S6 – 26
  • 27. Setting Control Limits Process average x = 12 ounces Average range R = .25 Sample size n = 5 UCLx = x + A2R = 12 + (.577)(.25) = 12 + .144 = 12.144 ounces From Table S6.1 © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. S6 – 27
  • 28. Setting Control Limits Process average x = 12 ounces Average range R = .25 Sample size n = 5 UCLx = x + A2R UCL = 12.144 = 12 + (.577)(.25) = 12 + .144 Mean = 12 = 12.144 ounces LCLx = x - A2R LCL = 11.857 = 12 - .144 = 11.857 ounces © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. S6 – 28
  • 29. R – Chart  Type of variables control chart  Shows sample ranges over time  Difference between smallest and largest values in sample  Monitors process variability  Independent from process mean © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. S6 – 29
  • 30. Setting Chart Limits For R-Charts Upper control limit (UCLR) = D4R Lower control limit (LCLR) = D3R where R = average range of the samples D3 and D4 = control chart factors from Table S6.1 © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. S6 – 30
  • 31. Setting Control Limits Average range R = 5.3 pounds Sample size n = 5 From Table S6.1 D4 = 2.115, D3 = 0 UCLR = D4R UCL = 11.2 = (2.115)(5.3) = 11.2 pounds Mean = 5.3 LCLR = D3 R LCL = 0 = (0)(5.3) = 0 pounds © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. S6 – 31
  • 32. Mean and Range Charts (a) These (Sampling mean is sampling shifting upward but distributions range is consistent) result in the charts below UCL (x-chart detects x-chart shift in central tendency) LCL UCL (R-chart does not R-chart detect change in mean) LCL Figure S6.5 © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. S6 – 32
  • 33. Mean and Range Charts (b) These (Sampling mean sampling is constant but distributions dispersion is result in the increasing) charts below UCL (x-chart does not x-chart detect the increase in dispersion) LCL UCL (R-chart detects R-chart increase in dispersion) LCL Figure S6.5 © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. S6 – 33
  • 34. Steps In Creating Control Charts 1. Take samples from the population and compute the appropriate sample statistic 2. Use the sample statistic to calculate control limits and draw the control chart 3. Plot sample results on the control chart and determine the state of the process (in or out of control) 4. Investigate possible assignable causes and take any indicated actions 5. Continue sampling from the process and reset the control limits when necessary © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. S6 – 34
  • 35. Manual and Automated Control Charts © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. S6 – 35
  • 36. Control Charts for Attributes  For variables that are categorical  Good/bad, yes/no, acceptable/unacceptable  Measurement is typically counting defectives  Charts may measure  Percent defective (p-chart)  Number of defects (c-chart) © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. S6 – 36
  • 37. Control Limits for p-Charts Population will be a binomial distribution, but applying the Central Limit Theorem allows us to assume a normal distribution for the sample statistics UCLp = p + zσ p ^ p(1 - p) σp = ^ n LCLp = p - zσ p ^ p = mean fraction defective in the sample z = number of standard deviations σp = standard deviation of the sampling distribution ^ n = sample size © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. S6 – 37
  • 38. p-Chart for Data Entry Sample Number Fraction Sample Number Fraction Number of Errors Defective Number of Errors Defective 1 6 .06 11 6 .06 2 5 .05 12 1 .01 3 0 .00 13 8 .08 4 1 .01 14 7 .07 5 4 .04 15 5 .05 6 2 .02 16 4 .04 7 5 .05 17 11 .11 8 3 .03 18 3 .03 9 3 .03 19 0 .00 10 2 .02 20 4 .04 Total = 80 80 (.04)(1 - .04) p= = .04 σp = = .02 (100)(20) ^ 100 © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. S6 – 38
  • 39. p-Chart for Data Entry UCLp = p + zσ p = .04 + 3(.02) = .10 ^ LCLp = p - zσ p = .04 - 3(.02) = 0 ^ .11 – .10 – UCLp = 0.10 .09 – Fraction defective .08 – .07 – .06 – .05 – .04 – p = 0.04 .03 – .02 – .01 – LCLp = 0.00 .00 – | | | | | | | | | | 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 Sample number © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. S6 – 39
  • 40. p-Chart for Data Entry UCLp = p + zσ p = .04 + 3(.02) = .10 ^ Possible LCLp = p - zσ p = .04 - 3(.02) = 0 ^ assignable causes present .11 – .10 – UCLp = 0.10 .09 – Fraction defective .08 – .07 – .06 – .05 – .04 – p = 0.04 .03 – .02 – .01 – LCLp = 0.00 .00 – | | | | | | | | | | 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 Sample number © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. S6 – 40
  • 41. Control Limits for c-Charts Population will be a Poisson distribution, but applying the Central Limit Theorem allows us to assume a normal distribution for the sample statistics UCLc = c + 3 c LCLc = c - 3 c c = mean number defective in the sample © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. S6 – 41
  • 42. c-Chart for Cab Company c = 54 complaints/9 days = 6 complaints/day UCLc = c + 3 c 14 – UCLc = 13.35 14 Number defective =6+3 6 12 – = 13.35 10 – 8 – 6 – c= 6 LCLc = c - 3 c 4 – =6-3 6 2 – LCLc = 0 0 – | | | | | | | | | =0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Day © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. S6 – 42
  • 43. Managerial Issues and Control Charts Three major management decisions:  Select points in the processes that need SPC  Determine the appropriate charting technique  Set clear policies and procedures © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. S6 – 43
  • 44. Which Control Chart to Use Variables Data  Using an x-chart and R-chart:  Observations are variables  Collect 20 - 25 samples of n = 4, or n = 5, or more, each from a stable process and compute the mean for the x-chart and range for the R-chart  Track samples of n observations each © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. S6 – 44
  • 45. Which Control Chart to Use Attribute Data  Using the p-chart:  Observations are attributes that can be categorized in two states  We deal with fraction, proportion, or percent defectives  Have several samples, each with many observations © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. S6 – 45
  • 46. Which Control Chart to Use Attribute Data  Using a c-Chart:  Observations are attributes whose defects per unit of output can be counted  The number counted is a small part of the possible occurrences  Defects such as number of blemishes on a desk, number of typos in a page of text, flaws in a bolt of cloth © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. S6 – 46
  • 47. Patterns in Control Charts Upper control limit Target Lower control limit Normal behavior. Process is “in control.” Figure S6.7 © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. S6 – 47
  • 48. Patterns in Control Charts Upper control limit Target Lower control limit One plot out above (or below). Investigate for Figure S6.7 cause. Process is “out of control.” © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. S6 – 48
  • 49. Patterns in Control Charts Upper control limit Target Lower control limit Trends in either direction, 5 plots. Figure S6.7 Investigate for cause of progressive change. © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. S6 – 49
  • 50. Patterns in Control Charts Upper control limit Target Lower control limit Two plots very near lower (or upper) Figure S6.7 control. Investigate for cause. © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. S6 – 50
  • 51. Patterns in Control Charts Upper control limit Target Lower control limit Run of 5 above (or below) central line. Figure S6.7 Investigate for cause. © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. S6 – 51
  • 52. Patterns in Control Charts Upper control limit Target Lower control limit Erratic behavior. Investigate. Figure S6.7 © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. S6 – 52
  • 53. Process Capability  The natural variation of a process should be small enough to produce products that meet the standards required  A process in statistical control does not necessarily meet the design specifications  Process capability is a measure of the relationship between the natural variation of the process and the design specifications © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. S6 – 53
  • 54. Process Capability Ratio Upper Specification - Lower Specification Cp = 6σ  A capable process must have a Cp of at least 1.0  Does not look at how well the process is centered in the specification range  Often a target value of Cp = 1.33 is used to allow for off-center processes  Six Sigma quality requires a Cp = 2.0 © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. S6 – 54
  • 55. Process Capability Ratio Insurance claims process Process mean x = 210.0 minutes Process standard deviation σ = .516 minutes Design specification = 210 ± 3 minutes Upper Specification - Lower Specification Cp = 6σ © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. S6 – 55
  • 56. Process Capability Ratio Insurance claims process Process mean x = 210.0 minutes Process standard deviation σ = .516 minutes Design specification = 210 ± 3 minutes Upper Specification - Lower Specification Cp = 6σ 213 - 207 = = 1.938 6(.516) © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. S6 – 56
  • 57. Process Capability Ratio Insurance claims process Process mean x = 210.0 minutes Process standard deviation σ = .516 minutes Design specification = 210 ± 3 minutes Upper Specification - Lower Specification Cp = 6σ 213 - 207 = = 1.938 Process is 6(.516) capable © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. S6 – 57
  • 58. Process Capability Index Upper Lower Cpk = minimum of Specification - x , x - Specification Limit Limit 3σ 3σ  A capable process must have a Cpk of at least 1.0  A capable process is not necessarily in the center of the specification, but it falls within the specification limit at both extremes © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. S6 – 58
  • 59. Process Capability Index New Cutting Machine New process mean x = .250 inches Process standard deviation σ = .0005 inches Upper Specification Limit = .251 inches Lower Specification Limit = .249 inches © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. S6 – 59
  • 60. Process Capability Index New Cutting Machine New process mean x = .250 inches Process standard deviation σ = .0005 inches Upper Specification Limit = .251 inches Lower Specification Limit = .249 inches (.251) - .250 Cpk = minimum of , (3).0005 © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. S6 – 60
  • 61. Process Capability Index New Cutting Machine New process mean x = .250 inches Process standard deviation σ = .0005 inches Upper Specification Limit = .251 inches Lower Specification Limit = .249 inches (.251) - .250 .250 - (.249) Cpk = minimum of , (3).0005 (3).0005 Both calculations result in New machine is .001 Cpk = = 0.67 NOT capable .0015 © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. S6 – 61
  • 62. Interpreting Cpk Cpk = negative number Cpk = zero Cpk = between 0 and 1 Cpk = 1 Cpk > 1 Figure S6.8 © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. S6 – 62
  • 63. Acceptance Sampling  Form of quality testing used for incoming materials or finished goods  Take samples at random from a lot (shipment) of items  Inspect each of the items in the sample  Decide whether to reject the whole lot based on the inspection results  Only screens lots; does not drive quality improvement efforts © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. S6 – 63
  • 64. Acceptance Sampling  Form of quality testing used for incoming materials or finished goods  Take samples at random from a lot Rejected lots can be: (shipment) of items  Inspect each of theReturnedthethe  items in to sample supplier  Decide whether to reject the whole lot  Culled for based on the inspection results defectives  Only screens lots; does not drive (100% inspection) quality improvement efforts © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. S6 – 64
  • 65. Operating Characteristic Curve  Shows how well a sampling plan discriminates between good and bad lots (shipments)  Shows the relationship between the probability of accepting a lot and its quality level © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. S6 – 65
  • 66. The “Perfect” OC Curve Keep whole shipment P(Accept Whole Shipment) 100 – 75 – Return whole 50 – shipment 25 – Cut-Off 0 – | | | | | | | | | | | 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 % Defective in Lot © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. S6 – 66
  • 67. An OC Curve Figure S6.9 100 – 95 – α = 0.05 producer’s risk for AQL 75 – Probability of 50 – Acceptance 25 – 10 – β = 0.10 0 |– | | | | | | | | Percent 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 defective AQL LTPD Consumer’s risk for LTPD Good Indifference Bad lots lots zone © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. S6 – 67
  • 68. AQL and LTPD  Acceptable Quality Level (AQL)  Poorest level of quality we are willing to accept  Lot Tolerance Percent Defective (LTPD)  Quality level we consider bad  Consumer (buyer) does not want to accept lots with more defects than LTPD © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. S6 – 68
  • 69. Producer’s and Consumer’s Risks  Producer's risk (α )  Probability of rejecting a good lot  Probability of rejecting a lot when the fraction defective is at or above the AQL  Consumer's risk (β )  Probability of accepting a bad lot  Probability of accepting a lot when fraction defective is below the LTPD © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. S6 – 69
  • 70. OC Curves for Different Sampling Plans n = 50, c = 1 n = 100, c = 2 © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. S6 – 70
  • 71. Average Outgoing Quality (Pd)(Pa)(N - n) AOQ = N where Pd = true percent defective of the lot Pa = probability of accepting the lot N = number of items in the lot n = number of items in the sample © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. S6 – 71
  • 72. Average Outgoing Quality 1. If a sampling plan replaces all defectives 2. If we know the incoming percent defective for the lot We can compute the average outgoing quality (AOQ) in percent defective The maximum AOQ is the highest percent defective or the lowest average quality and is called the average outgoing quality level (AOQL) © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. S6 – 72
  • 73. Automated Inspection  Modern technologies allow virtually 100% inspection at minimal costs  Not suitable for all situations © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. S6 – 73
  • 74. SPC and Process Variability Lower Upper specification specification limit limit (a) Acceptance sampling (Some bad units accepted) (b) Statistical process control (Keep the process in control) (c) Cpk >1 (Design a process that is in control) Process mean, µ Figure S6.10 © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. S6 – 74

Editor's Notes

  1. Points which might be emphasized include: - Statistical process control measures the performance of a process, it does not help to identify a particular specimen produced as being “good” or “bad,” in or out of tolerance. - Statistical process control requires the collection and analysis of data - therefore it is not helpful when total production consists of a small number of units - While statistical process control can not help identify a “good” or “bad” unit, it can enable one to decide whether or not to accept an entire production lot. If a sample of a production lot contains more than a specified number of defective items, statistical process control can give us a basis for rejecting the entire lot. The issue of rejecting a lot which was actually good can be raised here, but is probably better left to later.
  2. Students should understand both the concepts of natural and assignable variation, and the nature of the efforts required to deal with them.
  3. This slide helps introduce different process outputs. It can also be used to illustrate natural and assignable variation.
  4. Once the categories are outlined, students may be asked to provide examples of items for which variable or attribute inspection might be appropriate. They might also be asked to provide examples of products for which both characteristics might be important at different stages of the production process.
  5. This slide introduces the difference between “natural” and “assignable” causes. The next several slides expand the discussion and introduce some of the statistical issues.
  6. It may be useful to spend some time explicitly discussing the difference between the sampling distribution of the means and the mean of the process population.
  7. Instructors may wish to point out the calculation of the standard deviation reflects the binomial distribution of the population
  8. There is always a focus on finding and eliminating problems. But control charts find any process changed, good or bad. The clever company will be looking at Operator 3 and 19 as they reported no errors during this period. The company should find out why (find the assignable cause) and see if there are skills or processes that can be applied to the other operators.
  9. Instructors may wish to point out the calculation of the standard deviation reflects the Poisson distribution of the population where the standard deviation equals the square root of the mean
  10. Ask the students to imagine a product, and consider what problem might cause each of the graph configurations illustrated.
  11. Ask the students to imagine a product, and consider what problem might cause each of the graph configurations illustrated.
  12. Ask the students to imagine a product, and consider what problem might cause each of the graph configurations illustrated.
  13. Ask the students to imagine a product, and consider what problem might cause each of the graph configurations illustrated.
  14. Ask the students to imagine a product, and consider what problem might cause each of the graph configurations illustrated.
  15. Ask the students to imagine a product, and consider what problem might cause each of the graph configurations illustrated.
  16. Here again it is useful to stress that acceptance sampling relates to the aggregate, not the individual unit. You might also discuss the decision as to whether one should take only a single sample, or whether multiple samples are required.
  17. Here again it is useful to stress that acceptance sampling relates to the aggregate, not the individual unit. You might also discuss the decision as to whether one should take only a single sample, or whether multiple samples are required.
  18. You can use this and the next several slides to begin a discussion of the “quality” of the acceptance sampling plans. You will find additional slides on “consumer’s” and “producer’s” risk to pursue the issue in a more formal manner in subsequent slides.
  19. Once the students understand the definition of these terms, have them consider how one would go about choosing values for AQL and LTPD.
  20. This slide introduces the concept of “producer’s” risk and “consumer’s” risk. The following slide explores these concepts graphically.
  21. This slide presents the OC curve for two possible acceptance sampling plans.
  22. It is probably important to stress that AOQ is the average percent defective , not the average percent acceptable.
  23. It is probably important to stress that AOQ is the average percent defective , not the average percent acceptable.
  24. This may be a good time to stress that an overall goal of statistical process control is to “do it better,” i.e., improve over time.