SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 127
RAJESHWORI NGAKHUSHI
Bachelor of Optometry
Content
Introduction
Lens design
Lens materials
Verification
Standards and
ordering
Introduction
A thin glass shell bounded by concentric and
parallel spherical segments ( Fick )
A contact lens, or simply contact, is a thin lens
placed directly on the surface of the eye.
considered medical devices and can be worn to
correct vision, or for cosmetic or therapeutic
reasons
Lens design
Design of contact lens is an important issue – it
optimizes the ocular response for the individual
and purpose is to achieve comfort, safety and
vision
Design of the RGP lens can be more complex than
the soft lens
Design matters - Most with physiologically poorer
materials and Least with better materials
Soft lens design
94N27-9S.PPT
LENS PARAMETERSLENS PARAMETERS
tEA
tER
Ø0
Ø1
ØT Øa0
Ø0 = Back Optic Zone Diameter
(BOZD)
Øa0 = Front Optic Zone Diameter
(FOZD)
Ø1 = Back Peripheral Zone Diameter
(BPZD)
ØT = Total Diameter (TD)
tER = Radial Edge
Thickness
tEA = Axial edge Thickness
Soft lens design factors
• Geometric centre thickness
• Lens diameter (total diameter, TD)
• Back optic zone radius (BOZR)
• Back surface design
• Front optic zone radius (FOZR)
• Front surface design
Radial edge thickness
 Edge design
Material physical/mechanical properties
Material physiological properties
 Peripheral junctional thicknesses if transitions
exist
Soft contact lens design
1. DIAMETER :All soft lenses are fitted 1-2mm larger
than the horizontal visible iris diameter(HVID)
2. THICKNESS:
1. Along with central, mid peripheral and edge
thickness the overall lens thickness profile is also
important.
2. Local thickness is the only relevant thickness
when calculating local O2 availability since there
is little tear mixing under a soft lens
3. CURVATURE: the back and front optic zone Radii
are important to Rx determination other radii define
the physical design of the lens which also affects
lens behaviour .Corneal curvature -----flatter by 3-
5D
4. DESIGN: After defining centre thickness , front and
back radii in the optical zone, the remainder of the
lens design is defined by the radii of peripheral
curves , their widths , their numbers and the
junctional thickness.
Design—high prescription------aspheric design, multi
curve design
RELATIONSHIP WITH THE EYES: the
parameter of a contact lens should closely match the
dimensions of the ocular surface
 eg- corneal topography
HVID
1.Material properties
Material properties are very significant in soft
lens design
Material properties of a soft lens have a
significant effect on fitting behaviour, comfort,
durability, etc
Water contents of 25 - 79% means material
properties vary greatly
Significance of material properties often leads
lens designers to develop material-specific lens
series.
2.Center thickness consideration
1. Dk/t consideration- cornea’s O2 requirements
must be met
2. Pervaporation prevention: a high water material
with thin lens design, pervaporation corneal
dessication may result
3. Fitting considerations: too thin lens - excessive
flexing no dispersal of metabolic wastes due to
conformity overall lens performance is not good.
Lens wrinkiling causes ----corneal wrinkling and
staining
Minus lens series
Lenses of lower minus power (<2.00D) are made
thicker and with a larger FOZD to improve handling
For -3.00 to -6.00D,the lens series have constant
centre thickness
Plus lens series
Geometrical lens thickness cannot be decreased
since it is a function of BVP.
Reduction of FOZD is limited by vision issues –
not be tolerated by most wearers except with
small pupils
3.Water content and thickness
thickness lens
Below 0.10mm Thin lens
Below 0.07mm Ultrathin lens
Below 0.05mm Superthin or hyperthin lens
Diagrams Representing the O2 Performance of
Low/High Water and Thick/Thin Lenses
TRANSMISIBILITY (Dk/t)
Dk H2O content∝
O2 and CO2 transmissibilities 1/t∝
corneal respiration is best served by a thin high
water lens.
Higher the H2O content, higher Dk/t
Greater the thickness, lesser the Dk/t
tc for minus lenses overestimates Dk/t
tc in plus lenses underestimates Dk/t
To prevent corneal oedema Holden & Mertz(1984)
derived a criteria of critical oxygen transmissibility
and EOP values
Equivalent
oxygen
percentage
Type of lens
wear
O2
transmissibility
Dk/t
9.9% Daily wear 24
17.9% EW 87
12.1% Compromised
lens wear
34.3
 To achieve zero daytime edema
thickness are physiologically desirable they are
impractical
H2O
content
Daily wear Extended
wear
Compromise
EW
38% 0.033mm 0.009mm 0.023mm
75% 0.166mm 0.117mm
Pervaporation
If the lens is too thin, corneal dehydration may result
due to bulk flow of water through the lens and
instability of water flow at the lens surface
Produces epithelial desiccation staining -
pervaporation staining
High water content lenses loose more water than less
water content due to temperature difference, pH and
tonicity
HIGH WATER CONTENT LENSES
 Lose more water than low water lenses (% of
total) on eye
 Lose water even when worn in a high humidity
environment
Experience on-eye lens shrinkage which affects
TD and BOZR.
Advantages of high water content
lenses
• Better comfort because of material softness.
• Faster adaptation.
• Longer wearing time.
• Extended wear.
• Easier to handle because of greater thickness.
• Better vision because of greater thickness.
• Better for intermittent wear.
Disadvantages of high water content
lenses
• Shorter life span and Greater fragility.
• More deposits, especially white spots.
• More discolouration.
• Reproducibility less reliable.
• Greater variation with environment.
• Fitting requires longer settling time.
• Greater variability in vision.
• More solutions problems.
• Lens dehydration and Corneal desiccation.
Advantages of low water content
lenses
• Greater tensile strength.
• Less breakage.
• Longer life span.
• Better reproducibility.
• Easier to manufacture.
• Can be made thinner.
• Less dehydration on the eye.
• Less discolouration with age.
• Fewer solutions problems.
Disadvantages of low water content
lenses
• A greater tendency to cause corneal oedema.
• A long-term tendency with thicker lenses (e.g.
with high powers) to cause vascularization
4.Other Design Considerations
Centration Quality of vision, comfort and
mechanical effects of a lens on the eye, depend to
some extent on centration.
Movement - minimal amount of movement is
required for all soft contact lenses to remove debris
under the lens.
Design factors
Back surface designs
Front surface designs
Edge designs
Aspheric soft lenses
Lens design - limitations
Back Surface Designs
 Single curve - simplest design but not commonly
used.
Bicurve - second curve often 0.8 - 1.0 mm flatter
than BOZR and about 0.5 - 0.8 mm wide.
Blended multiple spherical curves (multicurve) –
fexible lenses don’t need a multicurve design
Aspheric – shapes cornea better
BACK PERIPHERAL CURVES
Presence or absence of back peripheral curves is
insignificant physiologically
Changes in back peripheral curves,especially
radical edge lift, affect lens movement
substantially
Front Surface Design
it tends to be ignored
important to lens fit and on-
eye behaviour
also influence the comfort of
the lens - especially true in
cases of higher Rxs because of
their greater thicknesses
Bicurve - with a peripheral curve chosen to
produce a thin edge.
Multiple blended peripheral spherical curves.
Continuous aspheric front surface curves are not
commonly used.
Front surface may also include bifocal or
multifocal components such as:
Continuous aspheric surface
 Concentric bifocal
 Flat-top segment
Edge Design and Thickness
Edge is already under both lids & has relatively little
effect on comfort
Edge thickness is governed by durability
considerations rather than comfort or physiology
concerns.
Too thick- discomfort
Too thin- tearing of the edge
Aspheric Soft Lenses
 ‘aspheric’ means a conicoid
 A mathematically regular nonspherical surface
usually take the form of a parabola, ellipse or
hyperbola and are defined by eccentricity.
Circle, e =0
Ellipse, e = 0.5
Parabola, e = 1
As eccentricity increases , the rate of peripheral
flattening or steepening increases exponentially
Contd.
e - Defines mathematically the departure of an
aspheric curve from a circle. Used to describe
both a lens form and the curvature of the cornea.
P value - Defines the rate of flattening with
eccentricity:p = 1 — e2.
closest mathematical approximation to the
topography of the human cornea is an ellipse.
Mean eccentricity = 0.45; p = 0.8.
ASPHERIC ADVANTAGES
• Better lens/cornea-peri-limbal fitting relationship
• Fewer base curve steps required
• Lens fit less sensitive to lens diameter changes
• Increased lens movement
• Bearing pressure more uniform
ASPHERIC DISADVANTAGES
• More expensive to manufacture
• Not as readily available
• Perceived to be more complex
• May decentre and move more than spherical
design
Manufacturing process may limit
lens design:
Method Limitations
Lathing
Molding-Anhydrous
Molding-Wet stabilized
Spin-casting
Molding & Lathing
Spin-casting & Lathing
Simple designs only
Few, but anisotropic expansion
on hydration changes lens shape
Almost none
Only simple back surface design
Possible
Lathing limitations
Lathing limitations
Rigid gas permeable Lens Design
Design is the cornerstone of any contact lens
fitting.
Ultimate goal of rigid lens design is to achieve
ideal fit
Essential for optimizing response
The desirable properties of an RGP lens are :
1. Optimal design
2. Material :
High Dk
Wettability
Deposit resistance
Stability
Ease of manufacture: manufacturing difficulties
with a particular material can be a barrier to its
usage.
DESIRED FITTING
Moderate edge width and clearance
Central and mid-peripheral alignment
Smooth movement
Centration
DESIRED PERFORMANCE
• Comfortable
• Clear vision
• Adequate wearing time
• Minimal ocular response
• Normal facial appearance
KEY DESIGN FEATURES
• Back surface design
• Back optic zone diameter
• Front surface design
• Lens thickness
• Edge configuration
• Lens diameter
Tricurve corneal lens
Øt - total diameter
Ø1 - first back peripheral
zone diameter;
Ø0 - back optic zone
diameter;
 ro -back optic zone radius
r1 - back peripheral radius
r 2 - second back peripheral
radius
Continous non spherical design
Single continuous curve - approximates
cornea’s shape
Aspheric designs
Regular non spherical curves whose
centers of curvature appear to be off the
axis of symmetry
BACK SURFACE DESIGN
Controls Lens/Cornea Interaction
Affects both centration and movement
DESIGN FREEDOM
• Spherical or aspheric
• Single or multiple curves
• Fitting relationship
Back surface design – clinical
considerations
Back optic zone radius
Aspheric Spheric
Better alignment
Difficult to manufacture
Difficult to verify
 more decentration
Better vision
Better centration
Optic zone should be larger than the pupil size and
should cover it during the movement
Also dependent upon the overall diameter and the
peripheral curve and power
Optimal Back Surface Design:
• Alignment or a very slight tendency towards apical
clearance over the central 7 – 8 mm.
• Mid-peripheral alignment about 1 – 2 mm wide.
• Edge clearance about 0.5 mm wide.
• An obvious tear meniscus at the lens edge.
Back Surface Mid-Periphery
Should align flattening cornea
secondary and peripheral zones must have curves
which are flatter than the BOZR
Affects:
• Tear flow
• Stability of the fit
• Corneal mid-peripheral shape
• Centration
Back surface periphery affects
Fluorescein pattern at the periphery of the lens
eg. A flat and wide peripheral curve will result in
excessive edge clearance producing a bright band of
fluorescein
Tear exchange is greater with a wide and flat
peripheral curve
Excessive edge clearance results in an unstable fit
with excessive lens movement
Peripheral or edge curve
Radius - 2.50 mm flatter than BOZR
Width - 0.30 to 0.50 mm
Affects:
• Peripheral fluorescein appearance
• Centration
• Tear exchange
• Lens fit
• 3 & 9 staining
Edge width and tear reservoir
Edge configuration
Position of apex – centrally located apex was more
comfortable
Should not exhibit any high point
The topography of lens just inside the lens edge aka
blend of junctions, influences the edge profile,
thickness, junction angles..
Affects
Comfort
Durability
Tear meniscus
Edge shapes of lenses: (a) posterior; (b)
central; (c) anterior;
(d) blunt; (e) sharp
Rounded edge – most comfortable
Edge profile rough or square at the anterior side –
least comfortable
Posterior design – square
 Comfort is determined by interaction of lens edge
with the lid
Edge shape vs comfort
IDEAL FITTING
Centre - aligned
Mid-periphery - align/min. clearance
Pheripheral curve - 0.3-0.5 mm wide
AEL - 75-100μm clearance
LENS THICKNESS
Determined by:
•Rigidity
• Permeability
• Back vertex power
CONSIDERATIONS
‘On-eye’ lens flexure
 Correction of corneal astigmatism
 Dk/t
Center thickness
Each lens material has a critical thickness –
minimum ct which can be made of a particular
lens material so that the lens does not flex on the
eye
Ct – more in higher dk lenses
Suggested minimum thicknesses for different
materials (BVP-3.00D)
Material tc (mm) te (mm)
PMMA
CAB
Silicon acrylate
Fluorosilicon
acrylate
0.10
0.16
0.15
0.14
0.12
0.12
0.13
0.15
More stable and comfortable – center of gravity is
posteriorly located
Can be made stable by the diameter of the lens,
mass by lenticular design or adding minus
carrier lenses
Lenticulation affects:
 Centre thickness - In plus lenses only.
 Lens mass - true for all lenses.
 O2 transmission - true for all lens types
comfort
influence comfort, movement and centration
Junction angle & thickness
Affects
• Comfort
• Lens movement
• Centration
• Lens bulk
Lens diameter
Determined by:
Corneal diameter
 HVID of patient
Inter-palpebral aperture
 Lens power (minus/plus)
Lens diameter
Affects:
• Centre of gravity
• Stability
• Option to have larger
BOZD/FOZD
• Comfort
• 3 & 9 staining
Centre of Gravity
OTHER DESIGN ISSUES
Tints
Handling
Aid to colour defectives
Lens Markings
For ‘piggyback’ fits
Contact lens
material
Introduction
Glass was used exclusively for some yrs
PMMA began to replace glass in 1940s –
toughness, optical properties and physiological
inactivity
IDEAL CONTACT LENS
MATERIAL
• Meets cornea’s oxygen requirements
• Physiologically inert
• Excellent in vivo wetting
• Resists spoilation
• Dimensionally stable
• Durable
• Optically transparent
• Requires minimal patient care
• Easily machineable
IMPORTANT MATERIAL
PROPERTIES
• Oxygen permeability
• Wettability
• Scratch resistance
• Rigidity (RGPs)
• Flexibility (SCLs)
• Durability
• Deposit resistance
OPTICAL PROPERTIES
• Refractive index
• Spectral transmission
• Dispersion
• Scatter
Rigid contact lens
Material used is PMMA
Stable materials
Resists warpage , wets well and clean easily
Lack of permeability to oxygen – tear exchange
phenomenon
Backbone of all rigid lens materials
Trial lens
Properties:-
 excellent biocompatibility
 good optical properties
 scratch resistance
 good manufacturing properties
Fairly wettable when clean.
 Easy to care for.
 Rigid.
 0.2 - 0.5% water when hydrated fully.
 Almost zero oxygen permeability.
Produces ‘spectacle blur’
Gas permeable lenses
Essentially rigid lenses
Material used are:
Cellulose acetate butyrate
Silicone acrylate
Fluoropolymers( teflon)
styrene
Cellulose acetate
Cellulose is combined with acetic and butyric
acids ( 13% acetyl, 37% butyryl and 1-2%free
hydroxyl groups)
Low oxygen permeability
dk range of 4-8
Lack of dimensional stability i.e. Warpage,
scratching and coating
No longer available
Silicone acrylate
Silicone and oxygen are combined to make into
siloxane
Combined with PMMA to produce a gas
permeable lens
Most successful rigid gas permeable material
introduced in 1970
Dk value range 12 to 60 are achievable
Negative charge
Tended to become coated with proteinaceous
materials from the tears
Scratches easily may cause flexure problems if
made thinner
Pure silicone – o2 permeability is high but poor
wettability
Polycon II 14.2
Fluoro-Siloxane Acrylates
(FSAs)
Fluorine monomer added to SA material
Lower surface charge
 Withstand high heat and chemical attack
O2 permeability is like silicone but more wettable
Dks 40 to 100+ (med-high)
Surface easily scratched
 Greater lens flexure
Perfluoroethersconsists of: Fluorine, Oxygen, Carbon and
Hydrogen
Dk 90+ (high)
Neutral surface charge
Greater flexibility ‘on eye’
Low refractive index
 High specific gravity
SOFT CONTACT LENS
MATERIALS
PHEMA
Incorporation of hydroxyl group into PMMA gives 2-
hydroxy ethylmethacrylate and makes it more
hydrophilic
close relative of poly(methyl methacrylate)
Water content is approximately 38%
Other variants to improve PHEMA are:
PVP Poly Vinyl Pyrrolidone
MA Methacrylic Acid
MMA Methyl Meth Acrylate
GMA Glyceryl Meth Acrylate
DAA Di Acetone Acrylamide
PVA Poly Vinyl Alcohol
Convenient to consider the polymers that have
been used as contact lens materials under four
heading:
1.Thermoplastics – capable of being shaped or
moulded under heat or pressure
Eg: PMMA
Polyethylene and polyvinyl chloride
Copolymer of tetrafluoroethylene
Poly(4-methyl pent-1-ene)
Cellulose acetate butyrate(CAB)-
Synthetic elastomers
Not only fexible but show rubber like behaviour
Intermediate characteristics b/w thermoplastic
and hydrogel materials.
Oxygen permeabilities 100x-1000x more than
PMMA
Hydrophobic – surface treatment
Ethylene propylene terpolymer(EPT)
Silicone rubber or poly(dimethyl siloxane)
Hybrid RGPs
have a rigid GP central optical zone, surrounded
by a peripheral fitting zone made of a soft contact
lens material.
second generation silicone hydrogel hybrid
contact lens called Duette. The lens features a
highly oxygen-permeable GP center (Dk 130),
surrounded by a soft silicone hydrogel "skirt" for
comfort (Dk 84; 32 percent water).
Hydrogels
Called as soft, elastic, water containing gels
Witcherle and coworkers– first developed
hydrogels polymers (PHEMA)
Made from HEMA, lightly cross linked with
ethylene glycol dimethacrylate. (spin cast)
Monomers commonly used in hydrogel contact
lens materials include
N-vinyl pyrrolidone (NVP),
Methacrylic acid (MA) and
Poly-2-hydroxyethyl me-thacrylate
(polyHEMA).
Some Examples of Hydrogel materials, by Water
Content
Group 1
Low Water Content
Nonionic
Group 2
High Water
Content
Nonionic
Group 3
Low Water Content
Ionic
Group 4
High Water
Content
Ionic
Crofilcon
Dimefilcon A
Genfilcon A
Hefilcon A & B
Hioxifilcon B
Iotrafilcon A
Isofilcon
Mafilcon
Polymacon
Tefilcon
Tetrafilcon A
generally show
lower levels of
protein deposit
Alphafilcon A
Altrafilcon
Ofilcon A
Omafilcon A
Scafilcon A
Surfilcon A
Vasurfilcon A
Xylofilcon A
Heat and
sorbic acid should
be avoided for
disinfection
because of the risk
of lens
discolouration.
Balafilcon A
Bufilcon A
Deltafilcon A
Droxifilcon A
Etafilcon A
Ocufilcon A
Phemfilcon A
Bufilcon A
Etafilcon A
Focofilcon A
Methafilcon A, B
Ocufilcon B
Ocufilcon C
Ocufilcon D
Ocufilcon E
Perfilcon A
Phemfilcon A
Tetrafilcon B
Vifilcon A
show the highest
level of protein
deposition ,
heat and sorbic
acid should be
avoided for lens
disinfection.
Verification
Contact lens verification undergoes two stages,
laboratory and clinical
Laboratory
During the final phase of manufacture, an
overall parameter check is performed to ensure
the lenses do not differ significantly from the
parameters ordered by the practitioner.
Clinics
Verification of lenses upon receipt, rather than
during the dispensing visit, is advisable
Why Verify Contact Lens Parameters?
Ensure correct lens is dispensed
Assess changes in contact lens with wear
To ensure that proper over-refraction and trial fitting
examination has been conducted
To correlate with the manufacturer’s parameter to
actual lens parameter
Prior to initial dispensing of CLs, the clinician
should verify that all parameters of the lenses are
as ordered and that they meet established (e.g.,
ANSI) standards.
 Rigid and soft lenses have similar parameters which
require verification by the practitioner.
 Radii of curvature
 Linear parameters
 Edge profile
 Power
 Lens quality
 Rigid and soft contact lenses should be hydrated in
a soaking solution for 12 - 24 hours before
verification procedures are conducted.
INSTRUMENTS
 Radiuscope
 Keratometer (modified)
 Toposcope
 Moiré fringe deflectometer
 Radius checking device
 Topographical mapping system
 Electrical conductivity method
 Microspherometer
Drysdale’s Principle
based on the theory that when a curved reflecting
surface is positioned so that the real image created by
the instrument is located at its centre of curvature
an image will be formed in the same plane as the
aerial object.
real image/aerial object is formed at the first focal
plane and an aerial image is formed at the second
focal plane
distance between the real image at the lens surface
and the aerial image
keratometer
used to measure the BOZR of a contact lens by using
special attachments.
Used with special contact lens holder which utilizes
the front surface silvered mirror and a lens support
Toposcope Moire’ fringes were used - measuring radii and diameters
of corneal lenses.
 target consist of a series of straight lines
 shape and orientation of the fringes formed were a
function of the relationship between the two sets of lines
 Straight parallel fringes indicate a spherical surface,
curved fringes indicate an elliptical surface. Any warpage
or dimples in the surface was indicated by irregularly
shaped fringes
Measures spherical, toric and aspheric contact lenses
Quality of lens surface can also be assessed
Power verification
verified with a lensometer
A smaller lens stop however, is recommended to
reduce the amount of light passing through the lens
focusing the light source more through the central
area of the lens.
May be recorded as being a greater positive or
smaller negative value than it actual value
True back vertex focal length is actually greater -
Back surface of lens is not in the plane of the stop
Lens must be centered
concave side down on
the focimeter stop -
BVP
with lens convex side
down - FVP
focimeter
Verification procedures
Diameters and linear
parameters
Measuring
magnifier
V gauze
Cast, dividers and
transparent rule
Micrometer &
spheres
Measuring magnifier
An adjustable eye piece through which an engraved
scale is viewed
Held with the concave surface towards the scale ( 20
mm long )
V gauge
Made of metal or plastic
V shaped channel cut into the material
Channel may vary in width from 6 to 12.50mm
Cast, dividers &
transparent rule
Micrometer &
spheres:
Thickness verification
Dial thickness gauze
Centre or edge thickness may
be determined with a suitable
thickness gauze which usually
incorporates a dial gauge
calibrated to 0.01mm
Centre thickness is measured
at a common geometric and
optical centre
LENS THICKNESS VERIFICATION:
Edge profile verification:
Instruments/techniques:
• Edge molding
• Projection magnifier
• Ehrmann profilometer
• Palm test
• Radiuscope (modified)
LENS AND SURFACE QUALITY
ASSESSMENT:
for RGP AND SCL
Instruments:
Magnifying 10x loupe
Projection magnifier
 Contact lens optical quality analyzer (CLOQA)
 Dark field microscope
 Moire fringe deflectometer
Differences between verification soft and RGP
lenses
Hydrogel contact lenses are flexible
If exposed to atmosphere, they dehydrate and alter
their contour. Verification in air is inaccurate due to-
Shrinkage of Hydrogel on dehydration
Accumulation of surface moisture
So, artifact liquid cells are used to measure
parameters of soft lenses
But RGP lenses can be measured in air
Contact lens standards
American National Standard Institute
(A.N.S.I.) 1999
Contact Lens Tolerances
Power Tolerance
O to 5.00D +/- 0.12D
SPHERE
POWER
5.12 to 10.00D +/- 0.18D
10.12 to 15.00D +/- 0.25D
15.12 to 20.00D +/- 0.50D
POWER TOLERANCE
CYLINDER
POWER
0 to 2.00D +/- 0.25
2.12 to 4.00D +/- 0.37
Over 4.00D +/- 0.50
Power Tolerance
Cylinder axis 0.50 to 1.50D +/- 8°
Above 1.50D +/- 5°
Parameter Tolerance
Bifocal
refractive
Add power +/-0.25D
Seg height +/-0.10mm
For toric lens cylindrical axis is specified in
relation to the base apex meridian
The terminology for a standard tricurve lens in ISO 8320-1986
symbols is:
Example:7.90:7.80/8.70:8.60/10.75:9.20 tc 0.15 BVP
-3.00D Tint light blue
7.90 = back optic zone radius (BOZR) r0
7.80 = back optic zone diameter (BOZD) 00
8.70 = first back peripheral radius r2
8.60 = first back peripheral zone diameter 02
10.75 = second back peripheral radius r2
9.20 = total diameter 0T
0.15 = geometric centre thickness tc
-3.00 = back vertex power (BVP)
The ISO 11539 standard for the classification of
contact lenses, describes the use of a six part code to
describe a material type
Prefix – stem – series suffix – group suffix – Dk range
– modification code
Prefix and series suffix – administrated by United
States Adopted Names (USAN) council and such are
only relevant for materials with FDA approval.
Two types of stem – filcon stem - materials which
contain >10% water by mass (hydrogels )
Focon stem – materials which contain <10% water by
mass ( non hydrogel )
Group suffix Filcon ( hydrogel) Focon ( non hydrogel)
I
II
III
IV
Low water content non ionic <50% EWC
<1% ionic monomer
High water content, non-ionic
>50%EWC, <1%ionic monomer
Low water content, ionic <50%EWC,
>1% ionic monomer
Low water content, non ionic>50%,>1%
ionic monomer
No silicon + no fluorine
CAB
Silicone + no fluorine
Silicon acrylate
Silicon + fluorine
Flurosilicon acrylate
No silicon + flurine
Flurocarbon
Contact lens ordering
Soft contact lens
In addition to the trade name of the lens being
ordered
An order for soft contact lens should include the
following parameters:
Base curve radius
Overall diameter
And power
Thank
you!!!

More Related Content

What's hot

Soft Contact Lens Fitting
Soft Contact Lens FittingSoft Contact Lens Fitting
Soft Contact Lens FittingVishakh Nair
 
Therapeutic contact lens
Therapeutic contact lensTherapeutic contact lens
Therapeutic contact lensHira Dahal
 
RGP Fitting
RGP Fitting RGP Fitting
RGP Fitting emlctvla
 
Special purpose frames
Special purpose framesSpecial purpose frames
Special purpose framesEyenirvaan
 
Pediatric Ophthalmic dispensing in different visual problems
Pediatric Ophthalmic dispensing in different visual problemsPediatric Ophthalmic dispensing in different visual problems
Pediatric Ophthalmic dispensing in different visual problemsRaju Kaiti
 
Presbyopic Contact Lenses: Bifocals and Multifocals
Presbyopic Contact Lenses: Bifocals and MultifocalsPresbyopic Contact Lenses: Bifocals and Multifocals
Presbyopic Contact Lenses: Bifocals and MultifocalsRabindraAdhikary
 
Therapeutic Contact lenses
Therapeutic Contact lensesTherapeutic Contact lenses
Therapeutic Contact lensesManoj Aryal
 
Dispencing optics
Dispencing opticsDispencing optics
Dispencing opticsMahantesh B
 
Prisms in optometry practice
Prisms in optometry practicePrisms in optometry practice
Prisms in optometry practiceHira Dahal
 
Frame types and parts
Frame types and partsFrame types and parts
Frame types and partsAyushiPatel59
 
soft contact lens optics and soft contact lens materials
soft contact lens optics and soft contact lens materialssoft contact lens optics and soft contact lens materials
soft contact lens optics and soft contact lens materialsBipin Koirala
 

What's hot (20)

Lens material
Lens materialLens material
Lens material
 
Special type of lenses
Special  type of lensesSpecial  type of lenses
Special type of lenses
 
Soft Contact Lens Fitting
Soft Contact Lens FittingSoft Contact Lens Fitting
Soft Contact Lens Fitting
 
Contact lens
Contact lensContact lens
Contact lens
 
Therapeutic contact lens
Therapeutic contact lensTherapeutic contact lens
Therapeutic contact lens
 
RGP Fitting
RGP Fitting RGP Fitting
RGP Fitting
 
Special purpose frames
Special purpose framesSpecial purpose frames
Special purpose frames
 
Frame measurementsand markings
Frame measurementsand markingsFrame measurementsand markings
Frame measurementsand markings
 
Introduction to cl fitting
Introduction to cl fittingIntroduction to cl fitting
Introduction to cl fitting
 
spectacle refraction versus ocular refraction
spectacle refraction versus ocular refractionspectacle refraction versus ocular refraction
spectacle refraction versus ocular refraction
 
History of contact lens
History of contact lensHistory of contact lens
History of contact lens
 
Pediatric Ophthalmic dispensing in different visual problems
Pediatric Ophthalmic dispensing in different visual problemsPediatric Ophthalmic dispensing in different visual problems
Pediatric Ophthalmic dispensing in different visual problems
 
Presbyopic Contact Lenses: Bifocals and Multifocals
Presbyopic Contact Lenses: Bifocals and MultifocalsPresbyopic Contact Lenses: Bifocals and Multifocals
Presbyopic Contact Lenses: Bifocals and Multifocals
 
Therapeutic Contact lenses
Therapeutic Contact lensesTherapeutic Contact lenses
Therapeutic Contact lenses
 
Dispencing optics
Dispencing opticsDispencing optics
Dispencing optics
 
Frame repairs and tools
Frame repairs and toolsFrame repairs and tools
Frame repairs and tools
 
Pediatric contact lens
Pediatric contact lensPediatric contact lens
Pediatric contact lens
 
Prisms in optometry practice
Prisms in optometry practicePrisms in optometry practice
Prisms in optometry practice
 
Frame types and parts
Frame types and partsFrame types and parts
Frame types and parts
 
soft contact lens optics and soft contact lens materials
soft contact lens optics and soft contact lens materialssoft contact lens optics and soft contact lens materials
soft contact lens optics and soft contact lens materials
 

Similar to contact lens material

Contact lens designs-1.pptx
Contact lens designs-1.pptxContact lens designs-1.pptx
Contact lens designs-1.pptxKarnikaJamwal
 
History & materials of conatct lens by pushkar dhir
History & materials of conatct lens by pushkar dhirHistory & materials of conatct lens by pushkar dhir
History & materials of conatct lens by pushkar dhirPushkar Dhir
 
Contact lens by navid
Contact lens by navidContact lens by navid
Contact lens by navidNavidRahman6
 
Optics and design of soft contact lens.pptx
Optics and design of soft contact lens.pptxOptics and design of soft contact lens.pptx
Optics and design of soft contact lens.pptxAshi Lakher
 
Contact lens options in keratoconus hira
Contact lens options in keratoconus hiraContact lens options in keratoconus hira
Contact lens options in keratoconus hiraHira Dahal
 
Contact lens in keratoconus
Contact lens in keratoconusContact lens in keratoconus
Contact lens in keratoconusRabindraAdhikary
 
Optics of contact lens and nomenclature copy [repaired] (1)
Optics of contact lens and nomenclature   copy [repaired] (1)Optics of contact lens and nomenclature   copy [repaired] (1)
Optics of contact lens and nomenclature copy [repaired] (1)Manjusha Lakshmi
 
Spherical soft contact lens fitting
Spherical soft contact lens fittingSpherical soft contact lens fitting
Spherical soft contact lens fittingMeghna Verma
 
Contact lens -Dr Ferdous
Contact lens  -Dr Ferdous Contact lens  -Dr Ferdous
Contact lens -Dr Ferdous Ferdous101531
 
Clinical Management of Aphakia and Pseudophakia.pptx
Clinical Management of Aphakia and Pseudophakia.pptxClinical Management of Aphakia and Pseudophakia.pptx
Clinical Management of Aphakia and Pseudophakia.pptxAshi Lakher
 
Terminologies in contact lens dimension and manufacturing of RGP lenses
Terminologies in contact lens dimension and manufacturing of RGP lensesTerminologies in contact lens dimension and manufacturing of RGP lenses
Terminologies in contact lens dimension and manufacturing of RGP lensesManoj Mahat
 
Cycloplegic refraction,spectacles and prescribing spectacles in children
Cycloplegic refraction,spectacles and prescribing spectacles in childrenCycloplegic refraction,spectacles and prescribing spectacles in children
Cycloplegic refraction,spectacles and prescribing spectacles in childrenSIDESH HENDAVITHARANA
 
Ortho - k lenses by Ashith Tripathi
Ortho -  k lenses by Ashith Tripathi Ortho -  k lenses by Ashith Tripathi
Ortho - k lenses by Ashith Tripathi Ashith Tripathi
 
STABILIZATION PROCEDURE FOR REDUCE THE ROTATION OF CONTACT LENCE.pptx
STABILIZATION PROCEDURE FOR REDUCE THE ROTATION OF CONTACT LENCE.pptxSTABILIZATION PROCEDURE FOR REDUCE THE ROTATION OF CONTACT LENCE.pptx
STABILIZATION PROCEDURE FOR REDUCE THE ROTATION OF CONTACT LENCE.pptxsonofonouu
 
OPTICS OF HUMAN EYE & REFRACTIVE ERRORS
OPTICS OF HUMAN EYE & REFRACTIVE ERRORSOPTICS OF HUMAN EYE & REFRACTIVE ERRORS
OPTICS OF HUMAN EYE & REFRACTIVE ERRORSSuraj Dhara
 

Similar to contact lens material (20)

Contact lens designs-1.pptx
Contact lens designs-1.pptxContact lens designs-1.pptx
Contact lens designs-1.pptx
 
History & materials of conatct lens by pushkar dhir
History & materials of conatct lens by pushkar dhirHistory & materials of conatct lens by pushkar dhir
History & materials of conatct lens by pushkar dhir
 
Contact lens by navid
Contact lens by navidContact lens by navid
Contact lens by navid
 
fitting RGP lenses
fitting RGP lensesfitting RGP lenses
fitting RGP lenses
 
Optics and design of soft contact lens.pptx
Optics and design of soft contact lens.pptxOptics and design of soft contact lens.pptx
Optics and design of soft contact lens.pptx
 
Contact lens options in keratoconus hira
Contact lens options in keratoconus hiraContact lens options in keratoconus hira
Contact lens options in keratoconus hira
 
Contact lens in keratoconus
Contact lens in keratoconusContact lens in keratoconus
Contact lens in keratoconus
 
Contact lens
Contact lensContact lens
Contact lens
 
Optics of contact lens and nomenclature copy [repaired] (1)
Optics of contact lens and nomenclature   copy [repaired] (1)Optics of contact lens and nomenclature   copy [repaired] (1)
Optics of contact lens and nomenclature copy [repaired] (1)
 
Scleral lenses
Scleral lensesScleral lenses
Scleral lenses
 
Spherical soft contact lens fitting
Spherical soft contact lens fittingSpherical soft contact lens fitting
Spherical soft contact lens fitting
 
Contact lens -Dr Ferdous
Contact lens  -Dr Ferdous Contact lens  -Dr Ferdous
Contact lens -Dr Ferdous
 
Clinical Management of Aphakia and Pseudophakia.pptx
Clinical Management of Aphakia and Pseudophakia.pptxClinical Management of Aphakia and Pseudophakia.pptx
Clinical Management of Aphakia and Pseudophakia.pptx
 
Terminologies in contact lens dimension and manufacturing of RGP lenses
Terminologies in contact lens dimension and manufacturing of RGP lensesTerminologies in contact lens dimension and manufacturing of RGP lenses
Terminologies in contact lens dimension and manufacturing of RGP lenses
 
01 & 02 Introduction & history of Contact Lenses.pptx
01 & 02  Introduction  & history of Contact Lenses.pptx01 & 02  Introduction  & history of Contact Lenses.pptx
01 & 02 Introduction & history of Contact Lenses.pptx
 
Contact lens
Contact lensContact lens
Contact lens
 
Cycloplegic refraction,spectacles and prescribing spectacles in children
Cycloplegic refraction,spectacles and prescribing spectacles in childrenCycloplegic refraction,spectacles and prescribing spectacles in children
Cycloplegic refraction,spectacles and prescribing spectacles in children
 
Ortho - k lenses by Ashith Tripathi
Ortho -  k lenses by Ashith Tripathi Ortho -  k lenses by Ashith Tripathi
Ortho - k lenses by Ashith Tripathi
 
STABILIZATION PROCEDURE FOR REDUCE THE ROTATION OF CONTACT LENCE.pptx
STABILIZATION PROCEDURE FOR REDUCE THE ROTATION OF CONTACT LENCE.pptxSTABILIZATION PROCEDURE FOR REDUCE THE ROTATION OF CONTACT LENCE.pptx
STABILIZATION PROCEDURE FOR REDUCE THE ROTATION OF CONTACT LENCE.pptx
 
OPTICS OF HUMAN EYE & REFRACTIVE ERRORS
OPTICS OF HUMAN EYE & REFRACTIVE ERRORSOPTICS OF HUMAN EYE & REFRACTIVE ERRORS
OPTICS OF HUMAN EYE & REFRACTIVE ERRORS
 

Recently uploaded

Radiation Dosimetry Parameters and Isodose Curves.pptx
Radiation Dosimetry Parameters and Isodose Curves.pptxRadiation Dosimetry Parameters and Isodose Curves.pptx
Radiation Dosimetry Parameters and Isodose Curves.pptxDr. Dheeraj Kumar
 
Statistical modeling in pharmaceutical research and development.
Statistical modeling in pharmaceutical research and development.Statistical modeling in pharmaceutical research and development.
Statistical modeling in pharmaceutical research and development.ANJALI
 
Clinical Pharmacotherapy of Scabies Disease
Clinical Pharmacotherapy of Scabies DiseaseClinical Pharmacotherapy of Scabies Disease
Clinical Pharmacotherapy of Scabies DiseaseSreenivasa Reddy Thalla
 
Introduction to Sports Injuries by- Dr. Anjali Rai
Introduction to Sports Injuries by- Dr. Anjali RaiIntroduction to Sports Injuries by- Dr. Anjali Rai
Introduction to Sports Injuries by- Dr. Anjali RaiGoogle
 
MedDRA-A-Comprehensive-Guide-to-Standardized-Medical-Terminology.pdf
MedDRA-A-Comprehensive-Guide-to-Standardized-Medical-Terminology.pdfMedDRA-A-Comprehensive-Guide-to-Standardized-Medical-Terminology.pdf
MedDRA-A-Comprehensive-Guide-to-Standardized-Medical-Terminology.pdfSasikiranMarri
 
Lippincott Microcards_ Microbiology Flash Cards-LWW (2015).pdf
Lippincott Microcards_ Microbiology Flash Cards-LWW (2015).pdfLippincott Microcards_ Microbiology Flash Cards-LWW (2015).pdf
Lippincott Microcards_ Microbiology Flash Cards-LWW (2015).pdfSreeja Cherukuru
 
METHODS OF ACQUIRING KNOWLEDGE IN NURSING.pptx by navdeep kaur
METHODS OF ACQUIRING KNOWLEDGE IN NURSING.pptx by navdeep kaurMETHODS OF ACQUIRING KNOWLEDGE IN NURSING.pptx by navdeep kaur
METHODS OF ACQUIRING KNOWLEDGE IN NURSING.pptx by navdeep kaurNavdeep Kaur
 
CEHPALOSPORINS.pptx By Harshvardhan Dev Bhoomi Uttarakhand University
CEHPALOSPORINS.pptx By Harshvardhan Dev Bhoomi Uttarakhand UniversityCEHPALOSPORINS.pptx By Harshvardhan Dev Bhoomi Uttarakhand University
CEHPALOSPORINS.pptx By Harshvardhan Dev Bhoomi Uttarakhand UniversityHarshChauhan475104
 
PULMONARY EDEMA AND ITS MANAGEMENT.pdf
PULMONARY EDEMA AND  ITS  MANAGEMENT.pdfPULMONARY EDEMA AND  ITS  MANAGEMENT.pdf
PULMONARY EDEMA AND ITS MANAGEMENT.pdfDolisha Warbi
 
PNEUMOTHORAX AND ITS MANAGEMENTS.pdf
PNEUMOTHORAX   AND  ITS  MANAGEMENTS.pdfPNEUMOTHORAX   AND  ITS  MANAGEMENTS.pdf
PNEUMOTHORAX AND ITS MANAGEMENTS.pdfDolisha Warbi
 
Presentation for Bella Mahl 2024-03-28-24-MW-Overview-Bella.pptx
Presentation for Bella Mahl 2024-03-28-24-MW-Overview-Bella.pptxPresentation for Bella Mahl 2024-03-28-24-MW-Overview-Bella.pptx
Presentation for Bella Mahl 2024-03-28-24-MW-Overview-Bella.pptxpdamico1
 
Culture and Health Disorders Social change.pptx
Culture and Health Disorders Social change.pptxCulture and Health Disorders Social change.pptx
Culture and Health Disorders Social change.pptxDr. Dheeraj Kumar
 
Glomerular Filtration and determinants of glomerular filtration .pptx
Glomerular Filtration and  determinants of glomerular filtration .pptxGlomerular Filtration and  determinants of glomerular filtration .pptx
Glomerular Filtration and determinants of glomerular filtration .pptxDr.Nusrat Tariq
 
SGK HÓA SINH NĂNG LƯỢNG SINH HỌC 2006.pdf
SGK HÓA SINH NĂNG LƯỢNG SINH HỌC 2006.pdfSGK HÓA SINH NĂNG LƯỢNG SINH HỌC 2006.pdf
SGK HÓA SINH NĂNG LƯỢNG SINH HỌC 2006.pdfHongBiThi1
 
SYNDESMOTIC INJURY- ANATOMICAL REPAIR.pptx
SYNDESMOTIC INJURY- ANATOMICAL REPAIR.pptxSYNDESMOTIC INJURY- ANATOMICAL REPAIR.pptx
SYNDESMOTIC INJURY- ANATOMICAL REPAIR.pptxdrashraf369
 
Nutrition of OCD for my Nutritional Neuroscience Class
Nutrition of OCD for my Nutritional Neuroscience ClassNutrition of OCD for my Nutritional Neuroscience Class
Nutrition of OCD for my Nutritional Neuroscience Classmanuelazg2001
 
VarSeq 2.6.0: Advancing Pharmacogenomics and Genomic Analysis
VarSeq 2.6.0: Advancing Pharmacogenomics and Genomic AnalysisVarSeq 2.6.0: Advancing Pharmacogenomics and Genomic Analysis
VarSeq 2.6.0: Advancing Pharmacogenomics and Genomic AnalysisGolden Helix
 
Primary headache and facial pain. (2024)
Primary headache and facial pain. (2024)Primary headache and facial pain. (2024)
Primary headache and facial pain. (2024)Mohamed Rizk Khodair
 
History and Development of Pharmacovigilence.pdf
History and Development of Pharmacovigilence.pdfHistory and Development of Pharmacovigilence.pdf
History and Development of Pharmacovigilence.pdfSasikiranMarri
 

Recently uploaded (20)

Epilepsy
EpilepsyEpilepsy
Epilepsy
 
Radiation Dosimetry Parameters and Isodose Curves.pptx
Radiation Dosimetry Parameters and Isodose Curves.pptxRadiation Dosimetry Parameters and Isodose Curves.pptx
Radiation Dosimetry Parameters and Isodose Curves.pptx
 
Statistical modeling in pharmaceutical research and development.
Statistical modeling in pharmaceutical research and development.Statistical modeling in pharmaceutical research and development.
Statistical modeling in pharmaceutical research and development.
 
Clinical Pharmacotherapy of Scabies Disease
Clinical Pharmacotherapy of Scabies DiseaseClinical Pharmacotherapy of Scabies Disease
Clinical Pharmacotherapy of Scabies Disease
 
Introduction to Sports Injuries by- Dr. Anjali Rai
Introduction to Sports Injuries by- Dr. Anjali RaiIntroduction to Sports Injuries by- Dr. Anjali Rai
Introduction to Sports Injuries by- Dr. Anjali Rai
 
MedDRA-A-Comprehensive-Guide-to-Standardized-Medical-Terminology.pdf
MedDRA-A-Comprehensive-Guide-to-Standardized-Medical-Terminology.pdfMedDRA-A-Comprehensive-Guide-to-Standardized-Medical-Terminology.pdf
MedDRA-A-Comprehensive-Guide-to-Standardized-Medical-Terminology.pdf
 
Lippincott Microcards_ Microbiology Flash Cards-LWW (2015).pdf
Lippincott Microcards_ Microbiology Flash Cards-LWW (2015).pdfLippincott Microcards_ Microbiology Flash Cards-LWW (2015).pdf
Lippincott Microcards_ Microbiology Flash Cards-LWW (2015).pdf
 
METHODS OF ACQUIRING KNOWLEDGE IN NURSING.pptx by navdeep kaur
METHODS OF ACQUIRING KNOWLEDGE IN NURSING.pptx by navdeep kaurMETHODS OF ACQUIRING KNOWLEDGE IN NURSING.pptx by navdeep kaur
METHODS OF ACQUIRING KNOWLEDGE IN NURSING.pptx by navdeep kaur
 
CEHPALOSPORINS.pptx By Harshvardhan Dev Bhoomi Uttarakhand University
CEHPALOSPORINS.pptx By Harshvardhan Dev Bhoomi Uttarakhand UniversityCEHPALOSPORINS.pptx By Harshvardhan Dev Bhoomi Uttarakhand University
CEHPALOSPORINS.pptx By Harshvardhan Dev Bhoomi Uttarakhand University
 
PULMONARY EDEMA AND ITS MANAGEMENT.pdf
PULMONARY EDEMA AND  ITS  MANAGEMENT.pdfPULMONARY EDEMA AND  ITS  MANAGEMENT.pdf
PULMONARY EDEMA AND ITS MANAGEMENT.pdf
 
PNEUMOTHORAX AND ITS MANAGEMENTS.pdf
PNEUMOTHORAX   AND  ITS  MANAGEMENTS.pdfPNEUMOTHORAX   AND  ITS  MANAGEMENTS.pdf
PNEUMOTHORAX AND ITS MANAGEMENTS.pdf
 
Presentation for Bella Mahl 2024-03-28-24-MW-Overview-Bella.pptx
Presentation for Bella Mahl 2024-03-28-24-MW-Overview-Bella.pptxPresentation for Bella Mahl 2024-03-28-24-MW-Overview-Bella.pptx
Presentation for Bella Mahl 2024-03-28-24-MW-Overview-Bella.pptx
 
Culture and Health Disorders Social change.pptx
Culture and Health Disorders Social change.pptxCulture and Health Disorders Social change.pptx
Culture and Health Disorders Social change.pptx
 
Glomerular Filtration and determinants of glomerular filtration .pptx
Glomerular Filtration and  determinants of glomerular filtration .pptxGlomerular Filtration and  determinants of glomerular filtration .pptx
Glomerular Filtration and determinants of glomerular filtration .pptx
 
SGK HÓA SINH NĂNG LƯỢNG SINH HỌC 2006.pdf
SGK HÓA SINH NĂNG LƯỢNG SINH HỌC 2006.pdfSGK HÓA SINH NĂNG LƯỢNG SINH HỌC 2006.pdf
SGK HÓA SINH NĂNG LƯỢNG SINH HỌC 2006.pdf
 
SYNDESMOTIC INJURY- ANATOMICAL REPAIR.pptx
SYNDESMOTIC INJURY- ANATOMICAL REPAIR.pptxSYNDESMOTIC INJURY- ANATOMICAL REPAIR.pptx
SYNDESMOTIC INJURY- ANATOMICAL REPAIR.pptx
 
Nutrition of OCD for my Nutritional Neuroscience Class
Nutrition of OCD for my Nutritional Neuroscience ClassNutrition of OCD for my Nutritional Neuroscience Class
Nutrition of OCD for my Nutritional Neuroscience Class
 
VarSeq 2.6.0: Advancing Pharmacogenomics and Genomic Analysis
VarSeq 2.6.0: Advancing Pharmacogenomics and Genomic AnalysisVarSeq 2.6.0: Advancing Pharmacogenomics and Genomic Analysis
VarSeq 2.6.0: Advancing Pharmacogenomics and Genomic Analysis
 
Primary headache and facial pain. (2024)
Primary headache and facial pain. (2024)Primary headache and facial pain. (2024)
Primary headache and facial pain. (2024)
 
History and Development of Pharmacovigilence.pdf
History and Development of Pharmacovigilence.pdfHistory and Development of Pharmacovigilence.pdf
History and Development of Pharmacovigilence.pdf
 

contact lens material

  • 3. Introduction A thin glass shell bounded by concentric and parallel spherical segments ( Fick ) A contact lens, or simply contact, is a thin lens placed directly on the surface of the eye. considered medical devices and can be worn to correct vision, or for cosmetic or therapeutic reasons
  • 4. Lens design Design of contact lens is an important issue – it optimizes the ocular response for the individual and purpose is to achieve comfort, safety and vision Design of the RGP lens can be more complex than the soft lens Design matters - Most with physiologically poorer materials and Least with better materials
  • 6. 94N27-9S.PPT LENS PARAMETERSLENS PARAMETERS tEA tER Ø0 Ø1 ØT Øa0 Ø0 = Back Optic Zone Diameter (BOZD) Øa0 = Front Optic Zone Diameter (FOZD) Ø1 = Back Peripheral Zone Diameter (BPZD) ØT = Total Diameter (TD) tER = Radial Edge Thickness tEA = Axial edge Thickness
  • 7.
  • 8. Soft lens design factors • Geometric centre thickness • Lens diameter (total diameter, TD) • Back optic zone radius (BOZR) • Back surface design • Front optic zone radius (FOZR) • Front surface design
  • 9. Radial edge thickness  Edge design Material physical/mechanical properties Material physiological properties  Peripheral junctional thicknesses if transitions exist
  • 10. Soft contact lens design 1. DIAMETER :All soft lenses are fitted 1-2mm larger than the horizontal visible iris diameter(HVID) 2. THICKNESS: 1. Along with central, mid peripheral and edge thickness the overall lens thickness profile is also important. 2. Local thickness is the only relevant thickness when calculating local O2 availability since there is little tear mixing under a soft lens
  • 11. 3. CURVATURE: the back and front optic zone Radii are important to Rx determination other radii define the physical design of the lens which also affects lens behaviour .Corneal curvature -----flatter by 3- 5D 4. DESIGN: After defining centre thickness , front and back radii in the optical zone, the remainder of the lens design is defined by the radii of peripheral curves , their widths , their numbers and the junctional thickness. Design—high prescription------aspheric design, multi curve design
  • 12. RELATIONSHIP WITH THE EYES: the parameter of a contact lens should closely match the dimensions of the ocular surface  eg- corneal topography HVID
  • 13. 1.Material properties Material properties are very significant in soft lens design Material properties of a soft lens have a significant effect on fitting behaviour, comfort, durability, etc Water contents of 25 - 79% means material properties vary greatly Significance of material properties often leads lens designers to develop material-specific lens series.
  • 14. 2.Center thickness consideration 1. Dk/t consideration- cornea’s O2 requirements must be met 2. Pervaporation prevention: a high water material with thin lens design, pervaporation corneal dessication may result 3. Fitting considerations: too thin lens - excessive flexing no dispersal of metabolic wastes due to conformity overall lens performance is not good. Lens wrinkiling causes ----corneal wrinkling and staining
  • 15. Minus lens series Lenses of lower minus power (<2.00D) are made thicker and with a larger FOZD to improve handling For -3.00 to -6.00D,the lens series have constant centre thickness
  • 16. Plus lens series Geometrical lens thickness cannot be decreased since it is a function of BVP. Reduction of FOZD is limited by vision issues – not be tolerated by most wearers except with small pupils
  • 17. 3.Water content and thickness thickness lens Below 0.10mm Thin lens Below 0.07mm Ultrathin lens Below 0.05mm Superthin or hyperthin lens
  • 18.
  • 19. Diagrams Representing the O2 Performance of Low/High Water and Thick/Thin Lenses
  • 20. TRANSMISIBILITY (Dk/t) Dk H2O content∝ O2 and CO2 transmissibilities 1/t∝ corneal respiration is best served by a thin high water lens. Higher the H2O content, higher Dk/t Greater the thickness, lesser the Dk/t tc for minus lenses overestimates Dk/t tc in plus lenses underestimates Dk/t
  • 21. To prevent corneal oedema Holden & Mertz(1984) derived a criteria of critical oxygen transmissibility and EOP values Equivalent oxygen percentage Type of lens wear O2 transmissibility Dk/t 9.9% Daily wear 24 17.9% EW 87 12.1% Compromised lens wear 34.3
  • 22.  To achieve zero daytime edema thickness are physiologically desirable they are impractical H2O content Daily wear Extended wear Compromise EW 38% 0.033mm 0.009mm 0.023mm 75% 0.166mm 0.117mm
  • 23. Pervaporation If the lens is too thin, corneal dehydration may result due to bulk flow of water through the lens and instability of water flow at the lens surface Produces epithelial desiccation staining - pervaporation staining High water content lenses loose more water than less water content due to temperature difference, pH and tonicity
  • 24. HIGH WATER CONTENT LENSES  Lose more water than low water lenses (% of total) on eye  Lose water even when worn in a high humidity environment Experience on-eye lens shrinkage which affects TD and BOZR.
  • 25. Advantages of high water content lenses • Better comfort because of material softness. • Faster adaptation. • Longer wearing time. • Extended wear. • Easier to handle because of greater thickness. • Better vision because of greater thickness. • Better for intermittent wear.
  • 26. Disadvantages of high water content lenses • Shorter life span and Greater fragility. • More deposits, especially white spots. • More discolouration. • Reproducibility less reliable. • Greater variation with environment. • Fitting requires longer settling time. • Greater variability in vision. • More solutions problems. • Lens dehydration and Corneal desiccation.
  • 27. Advantages of low water content lenses • Greater tensile strength. • Less breakage. • Longer life span. • Better reproducibility. • Easier to manufacture. • Can be made thinner. • Less dehydration on the eye. • Less discolouration with age. • Fewer solutions problems.
  • 28. Disadvantages of low water content lenses • A greater tendency to cause corneal oedema. • A long-term tendency with thicker lenses (e.g. with high powers) to cause vascularization
  • 29. 4.Other Design Considerations Centration Quality of vision, comfort and mechanical effects of a lens on the eye, depend to some extent on centration. Movement - minimal amount of movement is required for all soft contact lenses to remove debris under the lens.
  • 30. Design factors Back surface designs Front surface designs Edge designs Aspheric soft lenses Lens design - limitations
  • 31. Back Surface Designs  Single curve - simplest design but not commonly used. Bicurve - second curve often 0.8 - 1.0 mm flatter than BOZR and about 0.5 - 0.8 mm wide. Blended multiple spherical curves (multicurve) – fexible lenses don’t need a multicurve design Aspheric – shapes cornea better
  • 32. BACK PERIPHERAL CURVES Presence or absence of back peripheral curves is insignificant physiologically Changes in back peripheral curves,especially radical edge lift, affect lens movement substantially
  • 33. Front Surface Design it tends to be ignored important to lens fit and on- eye behaviour also influence the comfort of the lens - especially true in cases of higher Rxs because of their greater thicknesses
  • 34. Bicurve - with a peripheral curve chosen to produce a thin edge. Multiple blended peripheral spherical curves. Continuous aspheric front surface curves are not commonly used.
  • 35. Front surface may also include bifocal or multifocal components such as: Continuous aspheric surface  Concentric bifocal  Flat-top segment
  • 36. Edge Design and Thickness Edge is already under both lids & has relatively little effect on comfort Edge thickness is governed by durability considerations rather than comfort or physiology concerns. Too thick- discomfort Too thin- tearing of the edge
  • 37. Aspheric Soft Lenses  ‘aspheric’ means a conicoid  A mathematically regular nonspherical surface usually take the form of a parabola, ellipse or hyperbola and are defined by eccentricity. Circle, e =0 Ellipse, e = 0.5 Parabola, e = 1 As eccentricity increases , the rate of peripheral flattening or steepening increases exponentially
  • 38. Contd. e - Defines mathematically the departure of an aspheric curve from a circle. Used to describe both a lens form and the curvature of the cornea. P value - Defines the rate of flattening with eccentricity:p = 1 — e2. closest mathematical approximation to the topography of the human cornea is an ellipse. Mean eccentricity = 0.45; p = 0.8.
  • 39. ASPHERIC ADVANTAGES • Better lens/cornea-peri-limbal fitting relationship • Fewer base curve steps required • Lens fit less sensitive to lens diameter changes • Increased lens movement • Bearing pressure more uniform
  • 40. ASPHERIC DISADVANTAGES • More expensive to manufacture • Not as readily available • Perceived to be more complex • May decentre and move more than spherical design
  • 41. Manufacturing process may limit lens design: Method Limitations Lathing Molding-Anhydrous Molding-Wet stabilized Spin-casting Molding & Lathing Spin-casting & Lathing Simple designs only Few, but anisotropic expansion on hydration changes lens shape Almost none Only simple back surface design Possible Lathing limitations Lathing limitations
  • 42. Rigid gas permeable Lens Design Design is the cornerstone of any contact lens fitting. Ultimate goal of rigid lens design is to achieve ideal fit Essential for optimizing response
  • 43. The desirable properties of an RGP lens are : 1. Optimal design 2. Material : High Dk Wettability Deposit resistance Stability Ease of manufacture: manufacturing difficulties with a particular material can be a barrier to its usage.
  • 44. DESIRED FITTING Moderate edge width and clearance Central and mid-peripheral alignment Smooth movement Centration
  • 45. DESIRED PERFORMANCE • Comfortable • Clear vision • Adequate wearing time • Minimal ocular response • Normal facial appearance
  • 46. KEY DESIGN FEATURES • Back surface design • Back optic zone diameter • Front surface design • Lens thickness • Edge configuration • Lens diameter
  • 47. Tricurve corneal lens Øt - total diameter Ø1 - first back peripheral zone diameter; Ø0 - back optic zone diameter;  ro -back optic zone radius r1 - back peripheral radius r 2 - second back peripheral radius
  • 48. Continous non spherical design Single continuous curve - approximates cornea’s shape Aspheric designs Regular non spherical curves whose centers of curvature appear to be off the axis of symmetry
  • 49. BACK SURFACE DESIGN Controls Lens/Cornea Interaction Affects both centration and movement DESIGN FREEDOM • Spherical or aspheric • Single or multiple curves • Fitting relationship
  • 50. Back surface design – clinical considerations
  • 51. Back optic zone radius Aspheric Spheric Better alignment Difficult to manufacture Difficult to verify  more decentration Better vision Better centration
  • 52. Optic zone should be larger than the pupil size and should cover it during the movement Also dependent upon the overall diameter and the peripheral curve and power
  • 53. Optimal Back Surface Design: • Alignment or a very slight tendency towards apical clearance over the central 7 – 8 mm. • Mid-peripheral alignment about 1 – 2 mm wide. • Edge clearance about 0.5 mm wide. • An obvious tear meniscus at the lens edge.
  • 54. Back Surface Mid-Periphery Should align flattening cornea secondary and peripheral zones must have curves which are flatter than the BOZR Affects: • Tear flow • Stability of the fit • Corneal mid-peripheral shape • Centration
  • 55. Back surface periphery affects Fluorescein pattern at the periphery of the lens eg. A flat and wide peripheral curve will result in excessive edge clearance producing a bright band of fluorescein Tear exchange is greater with a wide and flat peripheral curve Excessive edge clearance results in an unstable fit with excessive lens movement
  • 56.
  • 57. Peripheral or edge curve Radius - 2.50 mm flatter than BOZR Width - 0.30 to 0.50 mm Affects: • Peripheral fluorescein appearance • Centration • Tear exchange • Lens fit • 3 & 9 staining
  • 58. Edge width and tear reservoir
  • 59. Edge configuration Position of apex – centrally located apex was more comfortable Should not exhibit any high point The topography of lens just inside the lens edge aka blend of junctions, influences the edge profile, thickness, junction angles.. Affects Comfort Durability Tear meniscus
  • 60. Edge shapes of lenses: (a) posterior; (b) central; (c) anterior; (d) blunt; (e) sharp
  • 61. Rounded edge – most comfortable Edge profile rough or square at the anterior side – least comfortable Posterior design – square  Comfort is determined by interaction of lens edge with the lid
  • 62. Edge shape vs comfort
  • 63. IDEAL FITTING Centre - aligned Mid-periphery - align/min. clearance Pheripheral curve - 0.3-0.5 mm wide AEL - 75-100μm clearance
  • 64. LENS THICKNESS Determined by: •Rigidity • Permeability • Back vertex power CONSIDERATIONS ‘On-eye’ lens flexure  Correction of corneal astigmatism  Dk/t
  • 65. Center thickness Each lens material has a critical thickness – minimum ct which can be made of a particular lens material so that the lens does not flex on the eye Ct – more in higher dk lenses
  • 66. Suggested minimum thicknesses for different materials (BVP-3.00D) Material tc (mm) te (mm) PMMA CAB Silicon acrylate Fluorosilicon acrylate 0.10 0.16 0.15 0.14 0.12 0.12 0.13 0.15
  • 67. More stable and comfortable – center of gravity is posteriorly located Can be made stable by the diameter of the lens, mass by lenticular design or adding minus carrier lenses
  • 68. Lenticulation affects:  Centre thickness - In plus lenses only.  Lens mass - true for all lenses.  O2 transmission - true for all lens types comfort
  • 69. influence comfort, movement and centration
  • 70. Junction angle & thickness Affects • Comfort • Lens movement • Centration • Lens bulk
  • 71. Lens diameter Determined by: Corneal diameter  HVID of patient Inter-palpebral aperture  Lens power (minus/plus)
  • 72. Lens diameter Affects: • Centre of gravity • Stability • Option to have larger BOZD/FOZD • Comfort • 3 & 9 staining
  • 74. OTHER DESIGN ISSUES Tints Handling Aid to colour defectives Lens Markings For ‘piggyback’ fits
  • 76. Introduction Glass was used exclusively for some yrs PMMA began to replace glass in 1940s – toughness, optical properties and physiological inactivity
  • 77. IDEAL CONTACT LENS MATERIAL • Meets cornea’s oxygen requirements • Physiologically inert • Excellent in vivo wetting • Resists spoilation • Dimensionally stable • Durable • Optically transparent • Requires minimal patient care • Easily machineable
  • 78. IMPORTANT MATERIAL PROPERTIES • Oxygen permeability • Wettability • Scratch resistance • Rigidity (RGPs) • Flexibility (SCLs) • Durability • Deposit resistance
  • 79. OPTICAL PROPERTIES • Refractive index • Spectral transmission • Dispersion • Scatter
  • 80. Rigid contact lens Material used is PMMA Stable materials Resists warpage , wets well and clean easily Lack of permeability to oxygen – tear exchange phenomenon Backbone of all rigid lens materials Trial lens
  • 81. Properties:-  excellent biocompatibility  good optical properties  scratch resistance  good manufacturing properties Fairly wettable when clean.  Easy to care for.  Rigid.  0.2 - 0.5% water when hydrated fully.  Almost zero oxygen permeability. Produces ‘spectacle blur’
  • 82. Gas permeable lenses Essentially rigid lenses Material used are: Cellulose acetate butyrate Silicone acrylate Fluoropolymers( teflon) styrene
  • 83. Cellulose acetate Cellulose is combined with acetic and butyric acids ( 13% acetyl, 37% butyryl and 1-2%free hydroxyl groups) Low oxygen permeability dk range of 4-8 Lack of dimensional stability i.e. Warpage, scratching and coating No longer available
  • 84. Silicone acrylate Silicone and oxygen are combined to make into siloxane Combined with PMMA to produce a gas permeable lens Most successful rigid gas permeable material introduced in 1970 Dk value range 12 to 60 are achievable
  • 85. Negative charge Tended to become coated with proteinaceous materials from the tears Scratches easily may cause flexure problems if made thinner Pure silicone – o2 permeability is high but poor wettability Polycon II 14.2
  • 86. Fluoro-Siloxane Acrylates (FSAs) Fluorine monomer added to SA material Lower surface charge  Withstand high heat and chemical attack O2 permeability is like silicone but more wettable Dks 40 to 100+ (med-high) Surface easily scratched  Greater lens flexure
  • 87. Perfluoroethersconsists of: Fluorine, Oxygen, Carbon and Hydrogen Dk 90+ (high) Neutral surface charge Greater flexibility ‘on eye’ Low refractive index  High specific gravity
  • 89. PHEMA Incorporation of hydroxyl group into PMMA gives 2- hydroxy ethylmethacrylate and makes it more hydrophilic close relative of poly(methyl methacrylate) Water content is approximately 38%
  • 90. Other variants to improve PHEMA are: PVP Poly Vinyl Pyrrolidone MA Methacrylic Acid MMA Methyl Meth Acrylate GMA Glyceryl Meth Acrylate DAA Di Acetone Acrylamide PVA Poly Vinyl Alcohol
  • 91. Convenient to consider the polymers that have been used as contact lens materials under four heading: 1.Thermoplastics – capable of being shaped or moulded under heat or pressure Eg: PMMA Polyethylene and polyvinyl chloride Copolymer of tetrafluoroethylene Poly(4-methyl pent-1-ene) Cellulose acetate butyrate(CAB)-
  • 92. Synthetic elastomers Not only fexible but show rubber like behaviour Intermediate characteristics b/w thermoplastic and hydrogel materials. Oxygen permeabilities 100x-1000x more than PMMA Hydrophobic – surface treatment Ethylene propylene terpolymer(EPT) Silicone rubber or poly(dimethyl siloxane)
  • 93. Hybrid RGPs have a rigid GP central optical zone, surrounded by a peripheral fitting zone made of a soft contact lens material. second generation silicone hydrogel hybrid contact lens called Duette. The lens features a highly oxygen-permeable GP center (Dk 130), surrounded by a soft silicone hydrogel "skirt" for comfort (Dk 84; 32 percent water).
  • 94. Hydrogels Called as soft, elastic, water containing gels Witcherle and coworkers– first developed hydrogels polymers (PHEMA) Made from HEMA, lightly cross linked with ethylene glycol dimethacrylate. (spin cast) Monomers commonly used in hydrogel contact lens materials include N-vinyl pyrrolidone (NVP), Methacrylic acid (MA) and Poly-2-hydroxyethyl me-thacrylate (polyHEMA).
  • 95. Some Examples of Hydrogel materials, by Water Content Group 1 Low Water Content Nonionic Group 2 High Water Content Nonionic Group 3 Low Water Content Ionic Group 4 High Water Content Ionic Crofilcon Dimefilcon A Genfilcon A Hefilcon A & B Hioxifilcon B Iotrafilcon A Isofilcon Mafilcon Polymacon Tefilcon Tetrafilcon A generally show lower levels of protein deposit Alphafilcon A Altrafilcon Ofilcon A Omafilcon A Scafilcon A Surfilcon A Vasurfilcon A Xylofilcon A Heat and sorbic acid should be avoided for disinfection because of the risk of lens discolouration. Balafilcon A Bufilcon A Deltafilcon A Droxifilcon A Etafilcon A Ocufilcon A Phemfilcon A Bufilcon A Etafilcon A Focofilcon A Methafilcon A, B Ocufilcon B Ocufilcon C Ocufilcon D Ocufilcon E Perfilcon A Phemfilcon A Tetrafilcon B Vifilcon A show the highest level of protein deposition , heat and sorbic acid should be avoided for lens disinfection.
  • 96.
  • 97. Verification Contact lens verification undergoes two stages, laboratory and clinical Laboratory During the final phase of manufacture, an overall parameter check is performed to ensure the lenses do not differ significantly from the parameters ordered by the practitioner. Clinics Verification of lenses upon receipt, rather than during the dispensing visit, is advisable
  • 98. Why Verify Contact Lens Parameters? Ensure correct lens is dispensed Assess changes in contact lens with wear To ensure that proper over-refraction and trial fitting examination has been conducted To correlate with the manufacturer’s parameter to actual lens parameter Prior to initial dispensing of CLs, the clinician should verify that all parameters of the lenses are as ordered and that they meet established (e.g., ANSI) standards.
  • 99.  Rigid and soft lenses have similar parameters which require verification by the practitioner.  Radii of curvature  Linear parameters  Edge profile  Power  Lens quality  Rigid and soft contact lenses should be hydrated in a soaking solution for 12 - 24 hours before verification procedures are conducted.
  • 100. INSTRUMENTS  Radiuscope  Keratometer (modified)  Toposcope  Moiré fringe deflectometer  Radius checking device  Topographical mapping system  Electrical conductivity method  Microspherometer
  • 102. based on the theory that when a curved reflecting surface is positioned so that the real image created by the instrument is located at its centre of curvature an image will be formed in the same plane as the aerial object. real image/aerial object is formed at the first focal plane and an aerial image is formed at the second focal plane distance between the real image at the lens surface and the aerial image
  • 103. keratometer used to measure the BOZR of a contact lens by using special attachments. Used with special contact lens holder which utilizes the front surface silvered mirror and a lens support
  • 104. Toposcope Moire’ fringes were used - measuring radii and diameters of corneal lenses.  target consist of a series of straight lines  shape and orientation of the fringes formed were a function of the relationship between the two sets of lines  Straight parallel fringes indicate a spherical surface, curved fringes indicate an elliptical surface. Any warpage or dimples in the surface was indicated by irregularly shaped fringes
  • 105. Measures spherical, toric and aspheric contact lenses Quality of lens surface can also be assessed
  • 106. Power verification verified with a lensometer A smaller lens stop however, is recommended to reduce the amount of light passing through the lens focusing the light source more through the central area of the lens. May be recorded as being a greater positive or smaller negative value than it actual value True back vertex focal length is actually greater - Back surface of lens is not in the plane of the stop
  • 107. Lens must be centered concave side down on the focimeter stop - BVP with lens convex side down - FVP focimeter
  • 108. Verification procedures Diameters and linear parameters Measuring magnifier V gauze Cast, dividers and transparent rule Micrometer & spheres
  • 109. Measuring magnifier An adjustable eye piece through which an engraved scale is viewed Held with the concave surface towards the scale ( 20 mm long )
  • 110. V gauge Made of metal or plastic V shaped channel cut into the material Channel may vary in width from 6 to 12.50mm
  • 111. Cast, dividers & transparent rule Micrometer & spheres:
  • 112. Thickness verification Dial thickness gauze Centre or edge thickness may be determined with a suitable thickness gauze which usually incorporates a dial gauge calibrated to 0.01mm Centre thickness is measured at a common geometric and optical centre
  • 114. Edge profile verification: Instruments/techniques: • Edge molding • Projection magnifier • Ehrmann profilometer • Palm test • Radiuscope (modified)
  • 115. LENS AND SURFACE QUALITY ASSESSMENT: for RGP AND SCL Instruments: Magnifying 10x loupe Projection magnifier  Contact lens optical quality analyzer (CLOQA)  Dark field microscope  Moire fringe deflectometer
  • 116. Differences between verification soft and RGP lenses Hydrogel contact lenses are flexible If exposed to atmosphere, they dehydrate and alter their contour. Verification in air is inaccurate due to- Shrinkage of Hydrogel on dehydration Accumulation of surface moisture So, artifact liquid cells are used to measure parameters of soft lenses But RGP lenses can be measured in air
  • 118. American National Standard Institute (A.N.S.I.) 1999 Contact Lens Tolerances Power Tolerance O to 5.00D +/- 0.12D SPHERE POWER 5.12 to 10.00D +/- 0.18D 10.12 to 15.00D +/- 0.25D 15.12 to 20.00D +/- 0.50D
  • 119. POWER TOLERANCE CYLINDER POWER 0 to 2.00D +/- 0.25 2.12 to 4.00D +/- 0.37 Over 4.00D +/- 0.50
  • 120. Power Tolerance Cylinder axis 0.50 to 1.50D +/- 8° Above 1.50D +/- 5° Parameter Tolerance Bifocal refractive Add power +/-0.25D Seg height +/-0.10mm For toric lens cylindrical axis is specified in relation to the base apex meridian
  • 121.
  • 122. The terminology for a standard tricurve lens in ISO 8320-1986 symbols is: Example:7.90:7.80/8.70:8.60/10.75:9.20 tc 0.15 BVP -3.00D Tint light blue 7.90 = back optic zone radius (BOZR) r0 7.80 = back optic zone diameter (BOZD) 00 8.70 = first back peripheral radius r2 8.60 = first back peripheral zone diameter 02 10.75 = second back peripheral radius r2 9.20 = total diameter 0T 0.15 = geometric centre thickness tc -3.00 = back vertex power (BVP)
  • 123. The ISO 11539 standard for the classification of contact lenses, describes the use of a six part code to describe a material type Prefix – stem – series suffix – group suffix – Dk range – modification code Prefix and series suffix – administrated by United States Adopted Names (USAN) council and such are only relevant for materials with FDA approval. Two types of stem – filcon stem - materials which contain >10% water by mass (hydrogels )
  • 124. Focon stem – materials which contain <10% water by mass ( non hydrogel ) Group suffix Filcon ( hydrogel) Focon ( non hydrogel) I II III IV Low water content non ionic <50% EWC <1% ionic monomer High water content, non-ionic >50%EWC, <1%ionic monomer Low water content, ionic <50%EWC, >1% ionic monomer Low water content, non ionic>50%,>1% ionic monomer No silicon + no fluorine CAB Silicone + no fluorine Silicon acrylate Silicon + fluorine Flurosilicon acrylate No silicon + flurine Flurocarbon
  • 126. Soft contact lens In addition to the trade name of the lens being ordered An order for soft contact lens should include the following parameters: Base curve radius Overall diameter And power