Grouping Social Media Monitoring Tools - Part 1

The social intelligence company
CHOOSE THE RIGHT ONE!
PART 1
GROUPING SOCIAL MEDIA
MONITORING TOOLS
Whitepaper
replise.com

replise.com
2 Tel: +36 1 457 83 50 Email: intelligence@replise.com
BRIEF
Monitoring social media! Do I need this? How do I get started? Should I buy software? Who will
manage it? What kind of data will it provide? How and for what purpose will I use the data in a daily
setting?
Numerous questions from various departments ranging from marketing to purchasing are raised at
least once a quarter throughout many companies.
The answers are relatively simple. Software may not always be needed, but the data and results
can be critical. Be it issues related to daily operations, PR activities, customer service, sales, com-
petitor analysis, campaign effectiveness analysis or even strategic market research or product
development, the cheapest and quickest answers are to be found in social media.
There are several hundreds of solutions offered for social media analysis, monitoring and research.
Like any other market, the market of social media monitoring solutions abounds in tools geared to
serve general needs or a given profession or sector. Although the common term for the industry is
social media monitoring, software and tools can be grouped into at least ten different categories
depending on the objectives:
• Supporting daily processes, tactical or strategic decisions;
• Assisting marketing, research and development, customer
service, HR or PR activities;
• Following the brand or consumer dialogs;
• Producing a simple report or analysis;
• Concentrating on the past or the future;
• Supporting local objectives, or providing an
international view.

replise.com
In our three-part study, the options available on the market today will be reviewed to help choose
the solution that is optimal for your needs by:
We can conclude that there is no
solution that would satisfy all busi-
ness requirements. It is important
to stress that the software is mere-
ly a tool to help answer questions.
The technology is accessible to vir-
tually anyone, but it takes human
resources and expertise to evalu-
ate, group and synthesize the data.
While it is important to learn about
the existing solutions, one must
understand the questions that we
want answered. This is essential
for making the right decision.
• grouping the various tools into categories;
• analyzing their functionality and their significance;
• and helping decision makers decide what criteria should be used and
what functionality should be considered when choosing a tool to align with
business needs.

replise.com
4 Tel: +36 1 457 83 50 Email: intelligence@replise.comreplise.com
CONTENTS
SOCIAL MEDIA MONITORING TOOLS GROUPED BY
FUNCTIONALITY, FOCUS, TASKS AND OTHER CHARACTERISTICS
1. Free vs. paid tools 5
2. Local focus vs. international tools 7
3. Data taken from firehose vs. tools with their own engine 9
4. Static vs. dynamic tools 10
5 Monitoring vs. cloud solutions 11
6. Company generated buzz (platform monitoring) vs. user-generated buzz
monitoring (social sphere monitoring) 13
7. Other solutions 14

replise.com
SOCIAL MEDIA MONITORING SOFTWARE GROUPED
BY FUNCTIONALITY, FOCUS AND TASKS
In conjunction with the maturing of social media, the need to quantify its effectiveness has also
increased, along with a number of solutions to address this need. Before delving into the details of
the different social media monitoring tools, let’s review what approaches have been wide-spread
throughout the world. The tools can be grouped based on the following basic criteria:
Characteristics:
They are usually the dressed-up version of the public search tool of some social platform.
These tools show the news flow of the hits based on the search criteria, but they do not have
analysis or reporting functionality.
• Advantages: They are free and usually easy-to-use.
• Disadvantages: They don’t handle foreign languages, grammatical inflections, nor root words
well; nor do they provide historical data or comment management functions, and usually
there is no ongoing development support.
Who should use these and why?
These free solutions may fit the bill for those wanting to complement their Google Alert
service with Twitter and Facebook monitoring. It is suitable for single-person businesses,
as well as B2B brands for daily alerts.
1. FREE VS. PAID TOOLS
FREE TOOLS

replise.com
Characteristics:
These are likely to be backed up by a development team, which suggests they have solutions
customized for business needs.
• Advantages: They are free and usually easy-to-use.
• Disadvantages: They cost money. Due to the relative novelty of this market, no set industry
standards exists, and finding the right tool for the job may sometimes be difficult. Choosing
the right product will take time, and decision-making won’t be easy. The various technolo-
gies used in these products will yield different quantitative results.
Nowadays, there’s a software solution for almost every realistic requirement. Unless there
is a technological barrier or resource limitation, a software solution is usually available.
That said, there is no tool that would serve every possible requirement, since different in-
terests require different, sometimes conflicting, solutions. Selecting a given social media
monitoring tool can help define where the focus will be in a communications strategy. The
wrong decision and inadequate software may bring inadequate, varied results.
Pricing is usually based on the number of keywords, topics and/or number of hits. You
should carefully consider what you’re getting for your money. Take advantage of person-
alized demos, webinars and trial periods to see if it is the right tool for your needs.
PAID TOOLS

replise.com
When monitoring social media activity, conversations about the brand, or ongoing dialogs
between potential customers, the language, region and market are usually also defined. Inter-
nationalized tools are well-suited to research several countries or a large region, in addition to
supporting global or regional strategic decisions. Local service providers should be used to
design and monitor campaigns, to evaluate their effectiveness and to identify opinion leaders.
In a given country, local and international tools can be compared on two main points:
• Adequate coverage: monitoring local platforms frequently used by the given country’s Inter-
net users – blogging services, micro-blogs, local social media pages, forums –which materi-
ally influence local consumer decisions.
• Familiarity with language and cultural characteristics: every language has its own rules when
it comes to inflections, root words, tenses and slang usage.
2. LOCAL FOCUS VS. INTERNATIONAL TOOLS
• Advantages: They focus on the given country’s or market’s consumers, and are familiar with
the traits of the local language and culture. Their search solutions cover leading local forums
and blogs, where most “influencers” are active. Their head office can sometimes be con-
tacted directly for support.
• Disadvantages: They can only analyze a single language or market. When several countries
are analyzed, it would be difficult to compare data due to different methodologies used by
the local tools. Functionality provided by multinational service providers is not always avail-
able in these tools, due to limited development resources.
It is usually not necessary to use an internationalized solution when the company is fo-
cused on a single, homogeneous market using the same language; a good quality local
service provider may be sufficient.
LOCAL TOOLS

replise.com
• Advantages: When analyzing several languages or markets, and the qualitative review is
sometimes more important than merely having accurate figures. The customized develop-
ment of an internationalized tool may cost less, and provide better functionality than a local
rival.
• Disadvantages: They’re usually more expensive than local tools. Their coverage may not be
adequate (except in the English-speaking countries), and their local language functions may
be inferior compared to solutions by local players (e.g. inflections, word use, tone of com-
ments). For an internationalized tool, a low number of hits may also pose problems, just as
the lack of local research and support.
These tools can be used to summarize data to support regional strategic decisions, as
well as to conduct international comparisons. These tools are recommended for both
multinational companies and international communications agencies.
INTERNATIONALIZED TOOLS

replise.com
• Advantages: These tools can cover the entire world. Very large amounts of data are available
for analysis.
• Disadvantages: Local coverage can be sporadic outside of the English-speaking world. Fire-
hoses primarily target the largest service providers. Software providers and end- users have
no say in what platforms fire-hoses use to source the data.
Tools may also be grouped based on whether they index data themselves or buy them from
data collectors, so-called Firehoses. The latter is what large producers of internationalized
tools usually provide.
• Advantages: In general, more accurate results can be achieved, once the problem of stor-
ing vast amounts of data is solved. A tool with a good quality built-in engine tends to better
cover sources in a given country/language, so a higher hit count can be expected. New data
sources can be included in the search as needed.
• Disadvantages: Developing and maintaining built-in search engines and the storage of data
can be costly, which may be reflected in the price of the service.
If all searches are done by a built-in search engine, achieving adequate coverage may take
a long time. Often, purchased data and proprietary data are merged into the same database
before it is served to customers.
PURCHASED DATA
TOOLS WITH BUILT-IN ENGINES
3. DATA FROM A FIREHOSE VS. TOOLS WITH
THEIR OWN ENGINE

replise.com
Characteristics:
Static tools can only show a certain point in time, additional options e.g. keyword filtering or
the modification of other settings is seldom possible.
• Advantages: These tools are often available at a lower price because of their technological
limitations.
• Disadvantages: Limitations of these tools will surface during daily use, since these static
tools cannot produce up-to-date reports quickly and easily. It can be difficult to analyze data
in enough detail with static tools.
These tools may be sufficient for daily monitoring of the press, e.g. by the PR department.
Characteristics:
In dynamic tools, settings can be adjusted with little to no limitations, new keywords may be
introduced, and reports can be fully customized. Most tools are not completely static or dy-
namic. Most tools are somewhere in between. More dynamic tools can typically meet a wide
variety of requirements.
• Advantages: Dynamic tools allow filters, settings and modifications to give the right answer
to the right question. Graphics are customizable, data can be sorted and ranked in a variety
of ways, and charts can be modified with a click of the mouse.
• Disadvantages: There is a learning curve involved.
Those wishing to uncover valuable information from social media to help understand
consumers’ behavior should definitely choose a dynamic tool. These tools are capable of
supporting both tactical and strategic decisions.
STATIC TOOLS
DYNAMIC TOOLS
4. STATIC VS. DYNAMIC TOOLS

replise.com
Characteristics:
Their primary purpose is to monitor
content as it is created, and send ap-
propriate notifications. These tools do a
decent job because of its PR focus; but
that’s about all.
• Advantages: The major advantage of
this type of monitoring-only solution is
its price. Typically, this type of service
is cheaper than other, more complex
services.
• Disadvantages: They do not support
detailed analyses. Reports provided by a simple monitoring tool are usually just numbers
(views, sentiment analyses, top sources etc.), and lack more detailed information on the
consumer mindset, and the direction that the business should be steered. These tools also
do not provide historical data, nor are they dynamic. Therefore their use as a research tool
is rather limited.
They are best suited for customer service and PR to carry out daily operational tasks.
It helps to consider the business need: a tool that merely informs, or a tool that also extracts
historical information for critical analysis. If you only want a notification service, or surface
level understanding of perceptions regarding a brand, then a simple monitoring service will
suffice. Once you are ready to go beyond, and become a modern social media brand, a tool
suitable for conducting research, performing competitive analysis and gaining insight is a
necessity.
MONITORING TOOLS
5. MONITORING VS. CLOUD SOLUTIONS

replise.com
Characteristics:
Tools ‘on the cloud’ not only provide monitoring services but also index web content made
available to subscribers through a cloud-based service. Like Google’s search engine, these
tools are able to list everything instantly, going back a couple of years. These good cloud-
based solutions complement marketing research efforts well; they provide valuable data fast-
er and cheaper, and from online sites where consumers spend their time. Their analysts can
add value to the service, since more complexity requires more expertise.
• Advantages: Apart from functioning as a monitoring tool, these provide information along
with other functionality and can be used for daily marketing activities, and for strategic or
tactical decision making. They are indispensable.
• Disadvantages: Since these are more complex and sophisticated than simple monitoring
tools, these may not be the simplest products to use, and they can be more expensive.
CLOUD SOLUTIONS

replise.com
Characteristics:
These tools analyze platforms that are monitored and controlled by the service provider, in-
dexing user activity to generate reports.
• Advantages: They give an overview of what is happening on the monitored platform, and us-
ing special metrics, show relevant focal points. They often provide demographic details and
activity data not easily measured by other tools.
• Disadvantages: These tools cannot convey much about what people are saying about the
brand on other public Facebook pages (user profiles or other pages), or other social media
platforms.
They’re best suited for social media marketing experts. These tools can help us under-
stand the effectiveness of our own channels, producing competitor comparison data.
Characteristics:
They not only monitor dedicated channels, but also analyze all pages of a platform or social
media platform. They can identify relevant conversations on hidden, lesser-known blogs or
forums as well.
• Advantages: Gives a more complete picture and is continuously monitored. They provide
consumer information generated by others, thus yielding more realistic consumer feedback.
• Disadvantages: We can’t think of any.
To group these products and services, it is an important to know what is being searched:
pages and channels owned or controlled by the service provider, or other social media outlets
and user-generated content as well.
COMPANY-GENERATED BUZZ MONITORING TOOLS
USER-GENERATED BUZZ MONITORING TOOLS
6. COMPANY GENERATED BUZZ (PLATFORM
MONITORING) VS. USER GENERATED BUZZ
MONITORING (SOCIAL SPHERE)

replise.com
Some tools not focused on the social media monitoring market also deserve attention as they
have boast similar functionalities. There are several solutions that serve, data-mining, CRM
or press monitoring purposes, but also include some social media monitoring functionality.
These are supplementary functionalities, hence not the main focus of these solutions. Thus
they cannot be expected to provide top-notch coverage, nor follow industry best practices.
It is worth considering the costs and services available when searching for the best tool. The
most expensive, most well-known monitoring software may not necessarily be the best choice
for your needs. The generated data’s purpose must also be considered. The researched data
can be useful to various organizations within a company, allowing cost-saving or cost-sharing
opportunities. Besides sheer numbers, the quality of results should weigh heavily in any deci-
sion.
7. OTHER SOLUTIONS

replise.com
About Replise:
The Social Intelligence Company
Founded 2010 in Hungary by serial entrepreneurs. Replise provides social research services in
more than 40 languages and operates offices in Germany, UK, Poland and Hungary. Focusing on
social research using proven market research methodologies, Replise has established partnerships
with classic market research firms. Replise’s services are based on the combination of a unique
high-end social analytics platform and a team of qualified analysts with years of market expertise.
We can provide access to historical as well as real time data from blogs, forums, news portals, video
platforms and social networks like Twitter and Facebook. Replise products and services are used by
well-known brands and many marketing and PR agencies across Europe.
Download more of our free white papers from: www.replise.com/category/white-papers/
You can also download out our case studies from: www.replise.com/category/case-studies
Contact Us:
REPLISE HEADQUARTERS
Replise Hungary Kft
ADDRESS:
Maros Business Center, Maros utca 19-21. 6. em.
1122 Budapest
Tel: +36 1 457 83 50
Fax: +36 1 457 83 50
EMAIL:
intelligence@replise.com
To make the right decision, it’s good to know what to expect from a social media
monitoring solution. In the next chapter, functionality in above-average tools will be
reviewed.
14/01/2014

Grouping Social Media Monitoring Tools - Part 1

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

Viewers also liked

Viewers also liked (12)

Similar to Grouping Social Media Monitoring Tools - Part 1

Similar to Grouping Social Media Monitoring Tools - Part 1 (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Grouping Social Media Monitoring Tools - Part 1