This document discusses the history and current state of relations between the Philippines and China. It notes that ancient relations were characterized by good neighborliness, while modern relations have been more complex, with periods of amity and hostility. Key topics covered include tributary missions dating back to the 10th century, periods of relations defined by the Cold War and normalization, and recent tensions over territorial disputes in the South China Sea. The document also outlines visits by Philippine presidents to China and identifies current issues challenging relations such as the situations at Scarborough Shoal and Second Thomas Shoal.
Technical Leaders - Working with the Management Team
Philippines-China Security Relations and the South China Sea Disputes: Current Situation and Future Directions
1. Philippine Institute for Peace, Violence and Terrorism Research (PIPVTR)
Asian Institute of Tourism (AIT)
Philippine Association for Chinese Studies (PACS)
Center for Political and Democratic Reforms, Inc. (CPDRI)
2. CENTER FOR INTELLIGENCE AND NATIONAL SECURITY STUDIES
Philippine Institute for Peace, Violence and Terrorism Research
www.pipvtr.com
ROMMEL C. BANLAOI
Chairman of the Board and Executive Director
Philippine Institute for Peace, Violence and Terrorism Research
Vice President, Philippine Association for Chinese Studies
3.
The
modern
history
of
Philippines-‐
China
rela5ons
is
a
tale
of
connec5ng
and
distancing,
of
love
and
hate,
of
amity
and
enmity,
admira5on
and
admoni5on,
and
of
hedging,
engaging,
balancing,
and
guessing.
CENTER FOR INTELLIGENCE AND NATIONAL SECURITY STUDIES
Philippine Institute for Peace, Violence and Terrorism Research
www.pipvtr.com
4.
The
ancient
history
of
Philippines-‐
China
rela5ons
is
a
very
long
history
of
good
neighborliness,
harmony
and
mutual
respect.
CENTER FOR INTELLIGENCE AND NATIONAL SECURITY STUDIES
Philippine Institute for Peace, Violence and Terrorism Research
www.pipvtr.com
5. • The
Kingdom
of
Butuan
was
in
contact
with
the
Song
dynasty
of
China
between
960
and
1279
AD.
CENTER FOR INTELLIGENCE AND NATIONAL SECURITY STUDIES
Philippine Institute for Peace, Violence and Terrorism Research
www.pipvtr.com
6. • On
17
March
1001,
King
Kiling
of
Butuan
(a
Mindanao
province)
organized
the
first
tributary
mission
to
China
CENTER FOR INTELLIGENCE AND NATIONAL SECURITY STUDIES
Philippine Institute for Peace, Violence and Terrorism Research
www.pipvtr.com
7. • In
1417,
Paduka
Batara,
the
Sultan
of
Sulu,
went
to
China
for
a
tributary
mission
during
the
reign
of
Emperor
Yung
Lo
(Pinyin,
Yung
Le).
• Between
1420-‐1424,
exchanged
missions
between
China
and
Mindanao
occurred
CENTER FOR INTELLIGENCE AND NATIONAL SECURITY STUDIES
Philippine Institute for Peace, Violence and Terrorism Research
www.pipvtr.com
8. Ancient
Chinese
Map
showing
Philippine
Islands
CENTER FOR INTELLIGENCE AND NATIONAL SECURITY STUDIES
Philippine Institute for Peace, Violence and Terrorism Research
www.pipvtr.com
9. • 1945-‐1949
Moment
of
Amity
(AVer
WW2)
• 1949-‐1974
Era
of
HosYlity
(During
the
Cold
War)
• 1975-‐1995
NormalizaYon
Period
(Comprehensive
RelaYons)
• 1995-‐2000
Troubled
RelaYons
(in
the
Mischief
Reef)
• 2000-‐2005
Rebuilding
and
Sustaining
Friendship
Enhancing
CooperaYon
(Use
of
China’s
soV
power
and
charm
offensives)
• 2005-‐2009
“Golden
Age”
for
Strategic
Partnership
• 2009-‐2011
Turbulent
Moments
• 2012
Standoff
(in
the
Scarborough
Shoal)
• 2012-‐2013
Years
of
Friendly
Exchanges?
CENTER FOR INTELLIGENCE AND NATIONAL SECURITY STUDIES
Philippine Institute for Peace, Violence and Terrorism Research
www.pipvtr.com
10. • VISITS
TO
CHINA
BY
PHILIPPINE
PRESIDENTS
– President
Ferdinand
E.
Marcos:
7
June
1975
– President
Corazon
C.
Aquino:
14
April
1988
– President
Fidel
V.
Ramos:
25
April
1993
– President
Joseph
E.
Estrada:
16
May
2000
– President
Gloria
Macapagal-‐Arroyo:
• 29
October
2001
•
1-‐3
September
2004
•
27
October-‐2
November
2006
• 21
April
2007
• 5-‐6
June
2007
•
1-‐2
October
2007
•
30
March
-‐1
April
2008
• 7-‐10
August
2008
• 23-‐27
October
2008
• 8-‐9
June
2010
2005
THE GOLDEN
AGE OF
PHILIPPINES-
CHINA
RELATIONS
CENTER FOR INTELLIGENCE AND NATIONAL SECURITY STUDIES
Philippine Institute for Peace, Violence and Terrorism Research
www.pipvtr.com
11. State
visit
to
China
of
President
Benigno
Aquino
III
1
September
2011
• Both
countries
agreed
that
the
Joint
Ac5on
Plan
for
Strategic
Coopera5on
signed
by
the
two
sides
on
29
October
2009
will
conYnue
to
guide
cooperaYon
in
all
fields.
CENTER FOR INTELLIGENCE AND NATIONAL SECURITY STUDIES
Philippine Institute for Peace, Violence and Terrorism Research
www.pipvtr.com
12. • Philippines-‐China
RelaYons
are
comprehensive
spanning
diplomaYc,
social,
cultural,
economic
and
military
aspects
CENTER FOR INTELLIGENCE AND NATIONAL SECURITY STUDIES
Philippine Institute for Peace, Violence and Terrorism Research
www.pipvtr.com
13. • Then
Chinese
President
Hu
declared
the
2012
and
2013
as
the
Philippines-‐China
Years
of
Friendly
Exchanges.
CENTER FOR INTELLIGENCE AND NATIONAL SECURITY STUDIES
Philippine Institute for Peace, Violence and Terrorism Research
www.pipvtr.com
14. CENTER FOR INTELLIGENCE AND NATIONAL SECURITY STUDIES
Philippine Institute for Peace, Violence and Terrorism Research
www.pipvtr.com
15. • Situa5on
in
the
Scarborough
Shoal
• RP
Submission
of
WPS
Claims
to
Interna5onal
Tribunal
• Increasing
Tensions
in
the
2nd
Thomas
(Ayungin
Shoal)
• Uncertain5es
on
the
passage
of
the
Code
of
Conduct
in
the
South
China
Sea
• Mari5me
na5onalism
CENTER FOR INTELLIGENCE AND NATIONAL SECURITY STUDIES
Philippine Institute for Peace, Violence and Terrorism Research
www.pipvtr.com
16. • Scarborough
Shoal
Situa5on
– EffecYvely
taken
over
by
China
in
May
2012
aVer
the
standoff
– China
fully
controls
now
all
fishing
acYviYes
in
the
area
CENTER FOR INTELLIGENCE AND NATIONAL SECURITY STUDIES
Philippine Institute for Peace, Violence and Terrorism Research
www.pipvtr.com
17. • RP
Submission
of
WPS
Claims
to
Interna5onal
Tribunal
– PH
lost
paYence
of
direct
bilateral
talks
to
peacefully
seele
disputes
(1995-‐2012)
– China
was
embarrassed
and
ignored
the
arbitraYon.
– PH
considered
the
arbitraYon
a
“moral
victory”.
– China
emphasized
the
need
for
direct
talks
to
seele
disputes
peacefully
CENTER FOR INTELLIGENCE AND NATIONAL SECURITY STUDIES
Philippine Institute for Peace, Violence and Terrorism Research
www.pipvtr.com
18. • Increasing
Tensions
in
the
2nd
Thomas
Shoal
(Ayungin
Shoal)
– China
thinks
that
PH
is
strengthening
its
presence
in
the
shoal
– China
wants
the
grounded
ship
removed
CENTER FOR INTELLIGENCE AND NATIONAL SECURITY STUDIES
Philippine Institute for Peace, Violence and Terrorism Research
www.pipvtr.com
19.
20.
21. • Uncertain5es
on
the
Passage
of
the
COC
– Vietnam
and
the
Philippines
want
to
double
up
the
process
in
passing
the
COC
– Malaysia
and
Brunei
approve
the
general
principle
of
having
a
COC
but
they
remain
quite
on
the
issue
– Indonesia,
Singapore
and
Thailand
are
anxious
to
pass
the
COC
but
not
pushing
hard
for
it
– Cambodia,
Myanmar
and
Laos
seem
to
be
disinterested
on
the
issue
of
the
COC
– China
is
not
in
a
hurry
to
pass
the
COC
as
it
is
saYsfied
with
the
DOC.
It
wants
to
implement
first
the
DOC.
CENTER FOR INTELLIGENCE AND NATIONAL SECURITY STUDIES
Philippine Institute for Peace, Violence and Terrorism Research
www.pipvtr.com
22. • Mari5me
na5onalism
– Territorial
disputes
between
the
Philippines
and
China
have
triggered
naYonalist
reacYons
from
their
respecYve
ciYzens.
– Involvement
of
the
emoYonal
public
in
the
territorial
disputes
complicate
the
nature
of
the
already
complex
problem
in
the
South
China
Sea.
CENTER FOR INTELLIGENCE AND NATIONAL SECURITY STUDIES
Philippine Institute for Peace, Violence and Terrorism Research
www.pipvtr.com
23. CENTER FOR INTELLIGENCE AND NATIONAL SECURITY STUDIES
Philippine Institute for Peace, Violence and Terrorism Research
www.pipvtr.com
24. • Fate
of
the
Code
of
Conduct
in
the
South
China
Sea
• Result
of
Interna5onal
Arbitra5on
• Status
of
the
Scarborough
Shoal
CENTER FOR INTELLIGENCE AND NATIONAL SECURITY STUDIES
Philippine Institute for Peace, Violence and Terrorism Research
www.pipvtr.com
25. • Code
of
Conduct
in
the
South
China
Sea
– If
passed,
its
departure
from
the
DOC
will
not
be
far
as
the
current
draV
talks
about
generaliYes
and
does
not
specify
measures
to
account
possible
violators.
• Though
it
will
be
legally
binding,
ASEAN
has
a
poor
track
record
in
enforcing
regional
rules.
– Thus,
bilateralism
maeers
strongly
in
enforcement.
•
PH
and
PRC
have
to
cul5vate
be`er
bilateral
rela5ons.
– COC
does
not
aim
to
seele
sovereignty
disputes.
• It
aims
to
provide
rules
for
“good
manners
and
right
conduct”
at
sea
to
avoid
untoward
incidents
and
arm
situaYon
in
the
mariYme
domain
of
the
South
China
Sea.
CENTER FOR INTELLIGENCE AND NATIONAL SECURITY STUDIES
Philippine Institute for Peace, Violence and Terrorism Research
www.pipvtr.com
26. • Code
of
Conduct
in
the
South
China
Sea
– If
not
passed,
claimants
are
not
prevented
from
pursuing
unilateral
acYons
that
can
open
the
Pandora’s
box
of
accidents
and
miscalculaYon
of
risks
– Unilateral
acYons
can
encourage
“arms
racing”
behavior
of
claimants
to
deter
one
another
from
intruding
in
their
claimed
mariYme
areas.
– Rule
of
para-‐military
force
(if
not
convenYonal
force)
rather
than
rule
of
law
will
prevail
in
the
South
China
Sea
– Philippines-‐China
security
rela5ons
will
be
in
the
constant
“guessing
game”,
if
not
in
the
perpetual
conflict.
CENTER FOR INTELLIGENCE AND NATIONAL SECURITY STUDIES
Philippine Institute for Peace, Violence and Terrorism Research
www.pipvtr.com
27. • Result
of
Interna5onal
Arbitra5on
– If
PH
wins
the
case
• InternaYonal
recogniYon
of
Philippine
mariYme
rights
will
have
profound
and
problemaYc
implicaYons
for
the
rest
of
the
claimants
(from
moral
victory
to
legal
victory).
• PH
sYll
needs
to
talk
to
China
bilaterally
for
enforcement.
CENTER FOR INTELLIGENCE AND NATIONAL SECURITY STUDIES
Philippine Institute for Peace, Violence and Terrorism Research
www.pipvtr.com
28. • Result
Interna5onal
Arbitra5on
– If
PH
loses
the
case,
that’s
the
end
of
its
mariYme
claims
• Moral
victory
for
China?
• Nightmare
for
the
rest
of
the
claimants?
• Will
PH
remove
its
faciliYes
in
its
occupied
land
features?
CENTER FOR INTELLIGENCE AND NATIONAL SECURITY STUDIES
Philippine Institute for Peace, Violence and Terrorism Research
www.pipvtr.com
29. • Status
of
Scarborough
Shoal
– Good:
PromoYon
of
open
fishing
acYviYes
and
coordinated
mariYme
patrols
– Bad:
China
to
ground
ship
on
the
shoal
to
establish
a
more
permanent
physical
presence.
– PH
will
maintain
safe
distance
as
a
prevenYve
measure.
CENTER FOR INTELLIGENCE AND NATIONAL SECURITY STUDIES
Philippine Institute for Peace, Violence and Terrorism Research
www.pipvtr.com
30. • Overlapping
fishing
acYviYes
and
increasing
mariYme
patrols
of
parYes
around
the
disputed
waters
in
the
South
China
Sea
can
raise
the
possibility
of
accidental
mariYme
clash
that
can
lead
to
violent
incidents.
• An
unintenYonal
accidental
clash
can
lead
to
unintended
armed
skirmishes
that
all
parYes
do
not
want
to
occur.
CENTER FOR INTELLIGENCE AND NATIONAL SECURITY STUDIES
Philippine Institute for Peace, Violence and Terrorism Research
www.pipvtr.com
31. • The
recent
tension
between
the
Philippines
and
Taiwan
over
the
killing
on
9
May
2013
of
a
Taiwanese
fisherman
on
the
contested
water
demonstrates
the
risk
of
a
potenYal
violent
conflict
that
can
happen
in
the
mariYme
domain.
• Involvement
of
the
public
in
the
can
complicate
the
situaYon.
CENTER FOR INTELLIGENCE AND NATIONAL SECURITY STUDIES
Philippine Institute for Peace, Violence and Terrorism Research
www.pipvtr.com
32. • China
is
the
world’s
number
2
largest
economy.
– In
2040,
the
Chinese
economy
will
reach
$123
trillion,
or
nearly
three
Ymes
the
economic
output
of
the
enYre
globe
in
2000.
• The
Philippines
has
become
Asia’s
fastest
growing
economy
– GDP
grew
by
7.8%
during
the
first
quarter
of
2013
outpacing
China,
which
grew
by
7.7%.
CENTER FOR INTELLIGENCE AND NATIONAL SECURITY STUDIES
Philippine Institute for Peace, Violence and Terrorism Research
www.pipvtr.com
33. • Economics
can
bring
the
Philippines
and
China
closer
together.
• But
poliYcs
over
the
issue
of
the
South
China
Sea
is
tearing
both
countries
apart.
• Can
we
just
allow
the
future
genera5on
solve
the
South
China
Sea
problem
to
enable
China
and
the
Philippines
to
work
together
now
in
other
fields?
CENTER FOR INTELLIGENCE AND NATIONAL SECURITY STUDIES
Philippine Institute for Peace, Violence and Terrorism Research
www.pipvtr.com
34. CENTER FOR INTELLIGENCE AND NATIONAL SECURITY STUDIES
Philippine Institute for Peace, Violence and Terrorism Research
www.pipvtr.com