https://ssimeetup.org/essif-lab-creating-funding-interoperable-ssi-infrastructure-europe-webinar-52/
Attend this webinar to learn about the eSSIF-Lab (EU H2020) project with Oskar van Deventer and Rieks Joosten from TNO in the Netherlands.
WHY: the eSSIF-Lab vision, objectives, and intended benefits;
WHAT: its (initial) functional architecture/components;
HOW: ways in which you may contribute (and possibly get funded for that).
eSSIF-Lab is an EU H2020 project whose purpose is to fundamentally improve real-life transactions via the Internet, by focusing on next-generation mental models for such next generation transactions, and using SSI technologies and implementations to realize them.
Today, conducting an online business transaction consist of an individual that fills in an online form, which is subsequently processed (data is validated, and a commitment decision is made). Filling in and validating forms can be quite tedious, frustrating, time consuming and costly. Digitally inexperienced people are known to give up on requesting (social) benefits they are entitled to, enlarging the digital divide. But even people with an academic background and years of IT experience find this difficult.
In the SSI-enabled world as eSSIF-Lab sees it, an SSI IT infrastructure can help to find, provide and validate the needed data electronically. This makes filling and processing forms much easier (people no longer have to understand forms, upload pdfs, etc.), much faster (people no longer have to go places to get paperwork) much cheaper (saving tens of billions of euro’s – or even more – on verification/validation costs and IT-links).
The current wealth of SSI-related products, technologies and standards is insufficient for realizing this vision, because it generally lacks interoperability and scalability, and does not address the process- and business levels.
eSSIF-Lab calls for a scalable and interoperable technological infrastructure that is very easy to use by and integrate with (the IT, the processes and the business/policies of) arbitrary organizations and individuals to request, obtain, store and issue data objects whose meaning (semantics), origin (provenance) and integrity can be proved (verified) – which is basically what SSI is all about.
The main task of the eSSIF-Lab consortium is to coordinate between and fund projects of SME’s/startups (from EU/EEA countries) that contribute to the realization of this vision, in terms of technology and/or associated business propositions, and that will work together so as to benefit from each other’s contributions.
Hot Sexy call girls in Rk Puram 🔝 9953056974 🔝 Delhi escort Service
eSSIF-Lab: creating & funding an interoperable SSI infrastructure in Europe
1. SSI Meetup 52 – eSSIF Lab
Tuesday, March 31st, 2020
Rieks Joosten
rieks.joosten@tno.nl
Oskar van Deventer
oskar.vandeventer@tno.nl
The NGI ESSIF-LAB project has received funding from the European Union’s
Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Programme under Grant Agreement No 871932
CC BY-SA 4.0 SSIMeetup.org
2. 1. Empower global SSI communities
2. Open to everyone interested in SSI
3. All content is shared with CC BY SA
Alex Preukschat @SSIMeetup @AlexPreukschat
Coordinating Node SSIMeetup.org
SSIMeetup objectives
SSIMeetup.orgssimeetup.org · CC BY-SA 4.0 International
3. LESS Identity & Trustless Identity
Two Major Tracks:
LESS Identity
“Legally-Enabled Self-Sovereign”
Identity*
Key characteristics:
● Minimum Disclosure
● Full Control
● Necessary Proofs
● Legally-Enabled
2
Trustless Identity
Or more properly “Trust
Minimized” Identity
Key characteristics:
● Anonymity
● Web of Trust
● Censorship Resistance
● Defend Human Rights vs. Powerful
Actors (nation states, multi-national
corps, mafias, etc.)
* Originally coined by Tim Bouma (@trbouma) https://medium.com/@trbouma/less-identity-65f65d87f56b
CC BY-SA 4.0 SSIMeetup.org
4. 3
It has
verifiable
credentials
It has a
business
model
It has an
invitation
protocol
It has a
credential
catalogue It has an
credentials
query
protocol
It has
decentralised
identifiers
CC BY-SA 4.0 SSIMeetup.org
5. 4
“Remember when, on the Internet, nobody knew who you were?”
CC BY-SA 4.0 SSIMeetup.org
8. 7
Citizen fills
in form
Application
Form
Civil servant
validates data
Store ‘clean’
Application forms
Make a decision:
Grant/Reject
(Already validated) data
from other IT systems may
be added to the forms
CC BY-SA 4.0 SSIMeetup.org
9. • User complaints
• I do not undersand the form (language).
• I do not know where to get the requested data.
• I don’t want to physically go places (municipality,
medical specialist) to get the requested data.
• I do not know if the data is good/acceptable.
• What bureaucracy!
• I don’t know any more – I give up.
• Validation challenges for the business
• How to properly instruct the people that validate forms?
• How to support them with IT (e.g. links with systems of
relevant authorities) – fully automated, or where they
have to login with username/password?
• What is the fallback in case of validator mistakes?
• How do I control the cost of validation?
• How do validation and rectification impact lead time?
8
Business Dilemma:
Pay the Price or Run the Risk
Impact: Societal Divide
Citizens that cannot complete
forms will not get the benefits
they are entitled to
CC BY-SA 4.0 SSIMeetup.org
12. User Benefits:
• Inclusivity: you no longer need to be
well-educated in order to fill in forms.
• Speed:
• Collect data electronically 🡪 speed.
• No need to physically go places to collect data.
Organizational Benefits:
• They get quality data, i.e.
• It means what it is supposed to mean;
• Data is verified by party that the organization itself trusts.
• Validation of data is easy:
• Cryptographic check on provenance and integrity of data;
• Electronic check op actuality.
• Higher customer/citizen satisfaction
🡪
higher filling in and success rates
resulting from faster decision making and
because users do not give up any more.
• Do away with IT-links that supply data that can now be
reliably and trustworthily be supplied by the users.
• Support for GDPR e.g. digitally providing purpose and other
meta data helps enforce the right of transparent information,
access, data portability, restriction of processing, etc.).
• New business opportunities arise because many more
kinds of data can become available.
11
• Ease:
• Minimize typing data.
• No need to upload PDFs.
• Minimize frustration.
CC BY-SA 4.0 SSIMeetup.org
13. = Objective Interoperable Tech:
• Functionally specified components …
(Apps, Agents, Wallets, Proxies, etc.)
• … for the exchange of Credentials/Attestations …
(W3C VCs, X.509 attr. Certs, ABCs, OIDC tokens,
SAML tokens, BlockCerts, OpenCerts, etc.)
• … over secured connections …
(traditional (e.g. SSL) en new (e.g. DIDComm))
• … that have connections (APIs) for legacy …
(webservers, WordPress, …)
• … and do not require tedious logins
(but do not forbid that either)
= Subjective Information Processing:
• Every party (individual, enterprise, government),
regardless of the vertical it is in
(admin, finance, health, telecom, energy, etc.)
• … must think (self-sovereignly) about the online
transactions it wants to participate in and the
business rules/policies for committing, …
(e.g. what data is needed, who is trusted as an issuer for
such data, what it means, liabilities, etc.)
• … establish processes for integrating SSI …
(e.g. for designing forms, annotating them with
credentials/attestation requests, etc.)
• … and create business-cases for driving adoption
and/or transformation.
We need to organize the
infrastructure collectively
… allowing it to be used
in individual use-cases
12
CC BY-SA 4.0 SSIMeetup.org
14. CC BY-SA 4.0
Business Oriented Topics:
• Credential catalogue
• Yellow pages service
• Webshop SSI business plugins
• Usability (for different verticals and/or
personal preferences)
• Lowering transformation barriers
• GDPR support/violation detection
• Attestation services (e.g. for application
integrity, functionality)
• Specification of credential types for
guardianship, mandates, delegation (and the
validation thereof)
Tech Infra Oriented topics
• Secure Credential Storage (wallet/hubs)
• SSI phone Apps and/or browser add-ons that
work with different kinds of credentials (e.g.
VCs, ABCs, …)
• Web server proxies that implement, or connect
with components for the various SSI roles
• Revocation service that allows verifier to
check for revocation of a credential any time
after having received it
• ‘On the fly' requesting the issuance of a
credential if it is asked for, but missing in the
wallet
• Cryptographically enforceable issuer policies
13
SSIMeetup.org
15. EU H2020 NGI
Infra open call Buss open call #1 Buss open call #2
SubgranteeSubgranteeSubgrantee
7 M€
3.1 M€ 1.27 M€ 1.22 M€
SubgranteeSubgranteeSubgrantee
SubgranteeSubgranteeSubgrantee
Technical & business mentoring for
subgrantees of buss open calls
Max 155 k€ per subgrantee Max 106 k€ per subgrantee Max 106 k€ per subgrantee
14
CC BY-SA 4.0 SSIMeetup.org
16. Infrastructure Open Call
• SSI architecture development
• Open-source SSI component development
• Agile development, integration, interoperability, testing
Business Open Call #1
• Generic SSI functionality, software & services
• Commercial, competitive
• Open source or proprietary as needed
Business Open Call #2
• Sector and application specific functionality,
software & services based on SSI
• Commercial, competitive
• Open source or proprietary as needed
Open-source
SSI components
Market
feedback
Products &
services
Customer
feedback
Round 1
Round 2
SSI vision &
architecture
Market
feedback
15
CC BY-SA 4.0 SSIMeetup.org
17. Business Open Call #2
Business Open Call #1
Infrastructure Open Call
*In coordination/liaison with
CEF EBSI eSSIF, EC NGI
and others
16
CC BY-SA 4.0 SSIMeetup.org
18. • Buss. Open Call (BOC)#1 opens: March 1, 2020
• BOC#1 closes: April 30, 2020 (13:00 CEST)
• Evaluation, establish sub-grant agreements:
beginning of August 2020.
The work starts September 2020 (=M1)
• Infra Open Call (IOC) opens: March 1, 2020
• IOC closes: June 30, 2020, or
when 25 eligible proposals are received
(but not before April 31st
).
• Evaluation, est. sub-grant agreements: 3+1 month after
closure of call. Then, the work starts.
17
CC BY-SA 4.0 SSIMeetup.org
19. •eSSIF-Lab home page
•Vision, purpose
•Functional architecture
•eSSIF-Lab Gitlab repo
•Infrastructure Open Call
•Business Open Call #1
18
CC BY-SA 4.0 SSIMeetup.org
20. Thank you for your attention
Take a look:
SSIMeetup.orgssimeetup.org · CC BY-SA 4.0 International
21. • Mean processingcosts:
• N-1
* cost of form design +
• Cost of validation +
• Cost of decisionmaking
• Validationcost for establishing a bank
account: > 100 €.
• Estimate of yearly validation cost in NL:
> 1.000.000.000 € / year.
• From days-months to minutes
• From days/weeks to seconds
• Average lead time =
• average time to fill in form +
• Mean time for data transport +
• average time for validation +
• average time for deciding
• # IT-Links that can be reduced. • ??? Per Link? Per organisation?
Money
Time
IT-Links
20
CC BY-SA 4.0 SSIMeetup.org
22. 21
check for expiry and revocations
SSI-Agent
(Holder, or
Wallet)
SSI-Agent
(Verifier)
Process info
request, i.e.
collect data
(attestations)
for responding;
and construct
the response
Request form metadata
Send form structure, attestation
requirements and other meta-data
Data/attestations that
satisfy the requirements
Commit / decline
SSI-Agent
(Issuer role)
Apply the business logic
(outside scope of SSI)
and decide to commit (or decline).
Public Ledger
register revocations
obtain missing data (attestations)
Check attestations,
i.e. the proofs of
integrity, provenance
Scan QR-code
register revocations
register revocations
CC BY-SA 4.0 SSIMeetup.org
23. Validate attestation
i.e. check proof of
integrity and
provenance
Make credential
and create proof
of integrity and
provenance
22
Request a
prod./svc.
Provide the
prod./svc.Party
(Holder role)
Issue
Credential
Request
Credential
Request
attestations
Share
attestations
Party
(Issuer role)
Party
(verifier role)
CC BY-SA 4.0 SSIMeetup.org