This document discusses transfusion-transmitted infections (TTIs) and methods for screening donated blood. It notes that TTIs include viruses like HIV, HBV, HCV that can remain undetected in the blood donor but be transmissible. Screening methods include serological tests like ELISA, CLIA, rapid tests, as well as nucleic acid amplification tests (NAATs) that can detect infections earlier. Implementing individual donor NAT in addition to serological screening provides an additional safety layer and reduces the risk window period for TTIs in blood donations.
3. Characteristic of TTI microbes
Presence in the blood for long periods, sometimes in high titers.
Stability in blood stored at 40C or lower.
Long incubation period before the appearance of clinical signs.
Asymptomatic phase or only mild symptoms in the blood donor.
4. Microbes transmitted by Blood
HIV
HBV
HCV
CMV
EBV
B19
HTLV
Malaria
Babesia
Trypanosoma cruzi
Leishmania
Toxoplasma gondi
Microfilaria
Syphilis
Donor bacteremia
to cause bacterial
sepsis
5. Blood screening for TTI
HIV-1 & HIV-2.
Hepatitis B
Hepatitis C
Syphilis
Malaria
Serological
/ NAT
RNA / DNAANTIGEN /
ANTIBODY
8. Evaluation of Assays
Testing of all assays against panel samples.
True positive samples and true negative samples in which sensitivity and
specificity respectively are determined.
Low level positive samples (Very early or late infection).
Samples covering a range of different genotypes and / or serotypes with
emphasis on local samples.
Known nonspecifically reacting samples or potentially cross-reactive
samples: i.e. samples from patients not infected with the target infection
9. Pre-analytical
Haemolysed sample
Grossly lipaemic samples
Repeated freezing and thawing
Contaminated samples and reagents
Improperly stored, expired and
deteriorated reagents
Factors affecting the Serological test
Analytical
Pipetting error
Improper incubation time & temperature
Improper washing procedure
Carry over from the adjacent specimen
Equipment malfunction
Calculation errors
Post analytical
Transcription errors
14. Interpretation of results
Validity Criteria
Internal control(Positive & Negative) and Blank value must be within
prescribed limits.
Cut off of test run is calculated as per kit insert.
External controls( Positive, borderline positive & negative ) must
give valid results.
15. CLIA
Chemiluminescence linked Immunoassay
Principally similar to ELISA.
Chromogenic substance
replaced by chemiluminescent
compounds ( Luminol and
acridinium ester).
Detection by Luminometer.
16. EVOLIS BioRad (ELISA).
360 samples can be run at a time.
COBAS 6000 e601(CLIA based).
Cobas e 411.
300 sample can be run at a time.
Automated Immunoassay
18. Rapid test
Rationale ?
Simple(One step method).
Rapid( takes 10-20 minutes).
Minimal training
No sophisticated instrument
Visual Point of care test.
Storage temperature- ambient
(200C to 250C)
Principle
o Immunochromatographic (ICT)(Lateral
flow) / (Vertical flow)
o Particle agglutination(e.g. gelatin or
latex)
o Dipstick and Comb assay based on EIA
20. Screening tests
• Anti –HIV 1,2 or HIV Ag + Anti HIV1,2
ELISA/ CLIA
• HIV-1 specific (p24, gp 120, gp 160, gp 41).
• HIV-2 specific gp 36.
• HIV RNA
HIV screening
21. o Informed consent prior to testing is essential.
o Ensure Confidentiality to protect donor from
Discrimination, Victimization, Psychological harm
22.
23. (For Transfusion/ transplantation safety)
One test kit required
A1
A1 + A1 –
Consider Positive2
Consider Negative
(Destroy the unit of blood as per guidelines
Refer to ICTC for confirmation of status after consent)
25. HCV
Screening:
o Anti HCV Ab IA or Combination HCV Ag/Ab
IA(ELISA/ CLIA).
o Anti HCV Ab rapid assay.
Antigen: Recombinant fusion Ag(Core, NS3,4,5).
Confirmatory test: RIBA or NAT.
29. Venereal Disease Research Laboratory(VDRL)
• Most widely used, simple & rapid serological
test.
• Cardiolipin antigen added with cholesterol &
lecithin.
Procedure
• Ag preparation: Reconstitution of VRDL
antigen with buffer & used within 24hours.
• Inactivation of patients serum at 560C for 30
minutes.
• 50 µl of inactivated serum is mixed with a drop
of VDRL Ag & slide is rotated at 180 rpm for 4
min.
• Examine under microscope(10X) for
flocculation.
30. Rapid Plasma Reagin (RPR)
• Another slide flocculation test using
disposable plastic cards.
• Cardiolipin antigen is stabilized by EDTA.
• Cardiolipin antigen coated with carbon
particle.
• Can be used with Blood , plasma & serum.
34. A nucleic acid test, often called a “NAT”, ( or Nucleic acid
amplification test- NAAT) is a molecular technique to amplifiy
specific portion of DNA or RNA to detect microbes.
Reduces the window period by detecting low levels of viral
genomic materials that are present soon after infection but
before the body start producing antibodies in response to a virus.
Complete automated system to screen HIV, HBV and HCV
simultaneously.
35.
36.
37.
38. Mini-pool- NAT / Individual donor NAT / Multiplex NAT
Types
• Individual Donor NAT: ID-NAT.
• Minipool NAT: Pooling of 6 or 8 donor samples before testing.
• Multiplex NAT.
Disadvantage with mini-pool NAT:
• Whole size of pooled blood donations is blocked until the NAT
report is available.
• Due to dilution, sensitivity of NAT might decrease.
• If pool tested positive, whole pool requires retesting to identify
single positive unit.
Kabita Chhatterjee et al, 2014 Asian J Transfus Sci;8:26-28.
Individual Donor NAT is ideal methodology for NAT as dilution due to
pooling may miss samples with low viral load.
39. Roche Cobas s 201 system.
Roche Cobas 4800 and 6800 system.
Taq Screen MPX
Taq Screen MPX Test v 2.0
PCR/RT-PCR Technology
Gene-Probe Novartis
Procleix Tigris system
Procleix Panther System
Procleix Ultrio
Procleix Ultrio Plus
Procleix Ultrio Elite Assay
TMA Technology
Fully automated NAT
Automated Pooling, extraction , amplification, detection and result reporting
45. NAT implementation in India
In India, Indraprastha Apollo Hospital, Delhi has taken the initiative
for NAT implementation for the first time in the country. In the first
nine months of implementing NAT, they were able to pick five (3HBV
and 2HCV) NAT yield samples among 13,331 sample test( Chaurasia
et al, 2014).
AIIMS, Delhi NAT study, 2009: More than 40,000 sample tested.
68 samples found positive by NAT but nonreactive by serology.
NAT yield rate is 1 in 598 for all the three viruses.
46. Conclusion
Blood safety is a greater challenge in India because of the high
seroprevalence of HIV(0.3%), HCV (0.7%), and HBV (1.4%) in blood
donor population.
Serological screening is a useful sensitive technique to screen blood
donor for TTI to save the lives of recipients. However to reduce the
window period use of NAT may be considered as an additional layer
of safety to the supply of blood and blood product.