What does increased gender diversity, and more women at the top, have to do with leadership and sustainable development in the ocean industries? What are the facts with regards to business impact, and what are the reasons for this? Here I summarise some of the latest insights and statements from those who lead in this field.
Women in Ocean Industries - Leadership, Sustainable Development & Maritime Security
1. Sofia Fürstenberg Stott
Owner & Chief Advisor
Fürstenberg Maritime Advisory
Sustainable Ocean Summit, World Ocean Council
Hotel l’Industrie, Paris
November 21st 2019
Women in Ocean
Industries
Leadership, Sustainable
Development & Maritime
Security
2. THE OCEAN IS
UNDER THREAT
Collaboration across the ocean
industries are needed to find and
scale the necessary solutions
4. Restrictive regulations
Long adaptation rates
Others
Conservative mindset
Lack of capital for
innovation
Blue World Perspective, Katapult Ocean, 2019
Barriers to innovation across ocean industries
5. “Adding one more
woman in a firm’s senior
management or
corporate board—while
keeping the size of the
board unchanged—is
associated with an 8–13
basis point higher return
on assets.”
- Christine Lagarde, IMF, March 2019
6. “If banks and financial
supervisors increased the
share of women in senior
positions, the banking
sector would be more
stable too.”
- Christine Lagarde, IMF, March 2019
Image: https://www.freepik.com/free-photos-vectors/money
7. Research pointing to benefits in gender difference
Women are more risk averse, reflecting a greater fear of failure, and less competitive
Thicker capital buffers
Especially in high-tech manufacturing
and knowledge-intensive services
Lower proportion of
non-performing loans
Greater resistance to stress
Diversity and complementarity of thought
leads to better decision-making
Banks with higher shares of
women board members:
Closing the Gender Gap, Era Dabla-Norris and Kalpana Kochhar, 2019
8. “When women are given land
rights, seeds, technical training
and access to markets, food
productivity can rise by more
than 20%”
- UN Food and Agriculture Organization
Can Ocean Industries learn from Agriculture?
10. Investors need to see benefits with green
“We need to show that
climate investments don’t
have to be too risky, and
we need to promote more
public-private
partnerships.”
- Emma Navarro, Vice President European Investment Bank, October 2019
“Encouraging innovative
projects in the “blue”
economy is not so much a
question of more money. It
is also about lifting barriers
to new projects, and
reducing investment risk.”
11. SDG 14 and the health of our planet is substantially less
likely to be attained if 50% of the population who can help
achieve these goals are ignored. Gender must be
embedded in all efforts to protect the ocean and engage
with it in a sustainable way.
- Peter Thomson, UN Special Envoy for the Ocean, United Nations
- Isabella Lövin, Minister for International Development Cooperation, Sweden
June 2019
12. THANK YOU!
Curious to hear more?
Please connect at
sofia@furstenbergmaritime.com
+45 4019 0234
Editor's Notes
Starting with the obvious! The ocean is under threat. We all know this. It’s not looking good, and while the ocean is holding so much opportunity for business, and while its resources are essential to sustain the world’s need for food, energy and minerals, the health of our ocean has not at all been prioritised to the levels needed.
We now understand, that in order to solve this massive challenge, collaboration across the ocean industries are needed to find solutions, and to scale these sustainably.
There are many people working with finding these solutions. Today there are more than 1000 ocean startups in the world, with ideas ranging from ocean health, harvest, transport, energy and new frontiers. But across these sectors, only one in ten are founded by women. The EU average for female founders and entrepreneurs is one in three. Why is this the case?
Perhaps there is a clue here. Looking at the 5 biggest barriers across ocean industries for innovation, a conservative mindset comes top, followed by the lack of capital for innovation. Could it be, that women are avoiding taking initiatives to lead in the ocean industries, because they are faced with a conservative mindset and lack of access to capital?
If that is the case, the industry is stupid. Because research has shown, that if you put one more woman into your management team, the business will do better. Performance improvements with up to 13% are not uncommon.
Not only would one more woman on the board improve the performance, but research shows that that the performance would be more stable too.
So why is this? What is it that only a woman can bring to the table? As always with statistics, you are dealing with a generalisation. But the research points to a couple of gender-specific traits: that women are more risk averse, they reflect a greater fear of failure, and they are less competitive. This doesn’t sound much good at all, does it?
Well, this traits have certain positive impact:
It has been shown, that particularly for high-tech manufacturing and knowledge-intensive services, more women at the top will create thicker capital buffers and improve performance of the portfolio. More so, a better diversity in the board room will evidently lead to better decision-making.
(Studies have found women to be more risk averse, reflecting greater fear of failure, and less competitive. Women’s greater caution has benefits: gender-balanced corporate boards improve firm performance, especially in high-tech manufacturing and knowledge-intensive services.
Similarly, banks with higher shares of women board members have thicker capital buffers, a lower proportion of nonperforming loans, and greater resistance to stress, possibly because having more women in executive positions contributes to diversity and complementarity of thought, leading to better decision-making.
Drawing on macroeconomic, sectoral, and firm-level data, a recent IMF study (Ostry and others 2018) suggests that men and women complement each other in the workplace in terms of different skills and perspectives, including different attitudes toward risk and collaboration.)
If we take a wider perspective again, looking at the ocean economy next to other industries, there might be an opportunity for learning. Look at agriculture for example. When women are given land rights, seeds, technical training and access to markets, food productivity can rise by more than 20%”
Improved gender equality is not only improving productivity. This an example from the coastal state of Odisha in India, where the local communities have been suffering from cyclones, rising sea levels and increasing water salinity, a crisis which has destroyed their farms and source of income. Now, by setting up village committees with an equal number of men and women, women became more empowered to highlighting the challenges they were faced with, and therefore in a better position to solve them, and to become innovators. In Odisha, these women have established floating gardens, micro-farms, to combat water and land salinity. Here they grow spices and vegetables, securing food access while building business and restoring the environment.
(This is a photo of a floating garden in Odisha state, India, provide income and food, and help to reduce water and land salinity.
In the coastal state of Odisha, India, women farmers have turned a crisis into an opportunity.
Cyclones, rising sea levels and increasing water salinity have devastated their communities and turned swaths of fertile ground into wasteland. For years, these women lost income, their health and nutrition suffered, and they found themselves ever more marginalised.
Women also established floating gardens to combat water and land salinity. These micro-farms are made of bamboo and a culture bed of local materials like dried water hyacinth, manure, compost and silt. On them, they grow spices and vegetables, providing food security and a source of income.
These innovations came about because local development practitioners set up village committees with an equal number of local women and men as members. Women became more empowered to highlight the challenges they faced and thus were in a better position to solve them.
Women play an essential role in food production; when women are given land rights, seeds, technical training and access to markets, food productivity can rise by more than 20%, according to the UN Food and Agriculture Organization.
In the fisheries sector, for example, women constitute about half the workforce. Yet they are largely concentrated in low-skilled, low-paid, seasonal jobs without labour rights protections. Men are more frequently involved in offshore and high-value fisheries according to the UN Food and Agriculture Organization and make up 81% of those involved in fish and aquaculture harvesting. Women, on the other hand, are overwhelmingly (90%) involved in secondary fields such as fish processing. They earn approximately 64% of men’s wages when carrying out the same work in aquaculture. Whilst women often depend on the sustainability of local resources, as men do, they frequently have a minimal voice in the governance of those resources.)
Now, back to the banks and boardrooms. As previously stated, women in general are more risk averse and more afraid of failure. While this has proven to have benefits for making better business decisions overall, perhaps women are more prone to see investments in the blue economy as risky? Perhaps this is also part of the reason why there is such small portion of female entrepreneurs in ocean tech? This is why I think Emma Navarro is making such an important point; maybe we will only really manage to solve the ocean challenges when we manage to remove barriers for new projects and significantly reduce the investment risks.