Exploring the intersections between innovation and campus sustainability at MIT
1. Glen A. Comiso | Sustainability Connect | May 8, 2017
A Learning Exchange
Exploring the Intersections between Innovation
and Campus Sustainability at MIT
2. 2
Glen Comiso (moderator)
Senior Director for Institute Affairs,
Office of the President
James May
Senior Project Manager, Campus Planning
Jinane Abounadi
Executive Director, MIT Sandbox Initiative
Program
Sarah Gallop
Co-Director, Office of Government & Community
Relations,
Office of the EVP
Panel Discussion
Institute perspective
Innovation of MIT campus
Accelerating innovation at MIT
Innovation ecosystem
3. 3
How is innovation at MIT unique?
How is MIT enhancing innovation?
How does innovation connect with sustainability?
Institute perspective on
innovation
8. 8
External collaboration critical for innovation
Accelerators
Industry
Start-ups
Venture Capital
Support Services
Non-profits
Universities
Government
9. 9
Problem: Existing innovation pipeline system not structured to support complex, slower-
growing concepts that could have huge long-term impact.
Opportunity to develop “innovation orchards”:
Lost potential: Big ideas not making it to market
Patient support: Capital and infrastructure
Access: Specialized equipment and expertise
10. THE ENGINE
=Founder Community
+Specialized Services
+Funding
+Network ofCollaborators
Highlights:
• Announced in October 2016 in new space at 501
Mass. Ave.
• Hired CEO, Katie Rae, in February 2017
• Closed $150M+ fund in April 2017
• Initial companies in Summer 2017
13. A R C H I T E C T U R E A T M I T : A H i s t o r y o f I n n o v a t i o n
T o w a r d a N e w P a r a d i g m
J a m e s M a y , A I A
O f f i c e o f C a m p u s P l a n n i n g
14. A Histor y of I nnovationARCHITECTURE AT MIT:
Design
Design
Design
Construction
Early Releases
1937
• PARADIGM 1
• A modern building in
neo-classical garb
• Building 7
William Bosworth
15. A Histor y of I nnovationARCHITECTURE AT MIT:
1939
• PARADIGM 2
• A modern building
plain and simple
• Building 57
Anderson and
Beckwith
16. A Histor y of I nnovationARCHITECTURE AT MIT:
1949
• PARADIGM 2
• A modern building
plain and simple
• Baker House
Alvar Aalto
17. A Histor y of I nnovationARCHITECTURE AT MIT:
1949
• Moors Hall
• Harvard University
18. A Histor y of I nnovationARCHITECTURE AT MIT:
Toward a New Paradigm
“The era of harm reduction, half steps, and lesser evils is behind us.
As a society, we need to be bold in ways that were once unimaginable.”
- The Bullitt Foundation
19. A Histor y of I nnovationARCHITECTURE AT MIT:
• Sistine Solar PV
Panels
• “We design and install
beautiful solar
systems that
complement your
home because you
shouldn’t have to
sacrifice style for
sustainability”
20. A Histor y of I nnovationARCHITECTURE AT MIT:
2013
• The Bullitt Center
• Seattle, Washington
• Miller Hull Partnership
• The goal of the Bullitt
Center is to drive
change in the
marketplace faster
and further
by showing what’s
possible today.
22. The goal of MIT Sandbox is to lower the barrier for students to experience
hands-on entrepreneurship and accelerate those with more advanced ideas or
technologies.
Experience authentic entrepreneurship
Explore how to get an idea to impact and
learn from failures
WHAT
Entrepreneurship Fellow
coaching
HOW
Mentorship from experienced professionals
Engage with knowledgeable mentors and
potential funders
All 11,000 MIT undergraduate and graduate
students
WHO
Workshops
Corporate/University partnerships
Legal and IP guidance
Networking with MIT and
external innovation ecosystem
Funding $1K-$25K
23. MIT Sandbox secured $2M/year with sponsors and investors to provide seed funding for students to experiment with innovation.
Fall ’16 (125)
76
37
13
7
0 20 40 60 80
$1K
$10K
Pending
Summer ’16 (110)
20
5
15
28
64
$…
$…
$…
Winter ’17 – IAP
• $1K for 24 StartMIT and Fuse teams
Spring ’17
• 80 applicants to over $5K
• 35 are 2nd or 3rd round SB teams
• 180 additional applications
• ~220 teams funded in the Spring
25. In one year, Sandbox funded over 30 students focused on
sustainability. MIT could provide pilots and accelerate teams.
Categories Problems Technologies
Smart Cities
Environment
Energy
Water
Transportation
Productivity
Health
Well-being
Ocean Health
Food
Alternative sources
Economics
Clean Water
Sensors
Smart Phones
Drones
Autonomous Vehicles
Big Data/AI
IoT
Networks
Social media
Renewable Energy
Nuclear Energy
Materials
Bio sensors
26. Density of Industry Transportationiversity & Research Sense of Place
gaged Civic Association Community Collaborations Sustainable Mixed-UseKey Catalysts
Successful Innovation Ecosystems
(and a focus on Kendall Square)
Sarah Gallop
Co-Director, Office of Government &
Community Relations
27. Sustainability Opportunities in Kendall
Advocate for Transportation
• Kendall Square Association
• Kendall Square Mobility Task Force
• Pedestrian and bicycle amenities
• Access MIT
Transportation
John Wilcox
28. Grow Collaborations with Nearby Neighborhoods
• Educational programming
• Mentoring/tutoring
• Workforce training
• Affordable housing
Community Collaborations
Sustainability Opportunities in Kendall
29. Preserve the Heritage of Old Districts
• New ideas like old buildings (Jane Jacobs)
• Diversity of architecture & sense of history
Model, Lead & Share Best Practices
• KSA Ecodistrict Committee
• Cambridge Compact for a Sustainable Future
Sustainable Mixed-Use
Sustainability Opportunities in Kendall
John Wilcox
Vision of The Engine initiated by op-ed in May 2014 by President Reif entitled “A better way to deliver innovation to the world”
Identified key issues with current innovation process related to “new science” innovations. Introduced idea of innovation orchards. Foundation for The Engine.
From slide:
Problem: Existing innovation pipeline system not structured to support complex, slower-growing concepts that could have huge long-term impact.
Opportunity to develop “innovation orchards”:
Lost potential: Big ideas not making it to market
Patient support: Capital and infrastructure
Access: Specialized equipment and expertise
Presentation stems from opening remarks given at a sustainability charrette for a new project.
Intended to be aspirational.
Discussion looks at the history of innovation in architecture at MIT. Specifically at the abrupt paradigm shift in the late 1930’s from a paradigm of modern-ish buildings shrouded in neo-classical garb to one of modern buildings that are unapologetically modern.
I postulate that MIT has been “rehearsing” for a pending new paradigm shift, but we are now ready to enter this new paradigm of architecture which is unapologetically, sustainable
Paradigm 1: 1916 – 1938 : Modern Buildings in neo-classical garb. Building 7 started construction in 1937 – the last building of this paradigm – yet fully a part of it.
Buildings are modern- ish: concrete structure, electrical lights, rudimentary ventilation. The series of connection buildings, while symmetric, or organized in a modern way - very much in response to programmatic requirements.
Yet – the concrete is covered with limestone. Elevations are rigidly ordered and composed in exterior elevation with little thought to functional program. (entablature over columns and windows deprives 4th floor spaces of exterior light.)
Two years later – abruptly and without transition, and without ever looking back, MIT is the first major academic institution in the US to break from the neo-classical tradition and adopt European modernism.
Paradigm 2.
Building 57 Alumni Pool – Unabashedly modern in the Bauhaus style. One of the first in the US. Must have looked like a spaceship at the time.
Plain and simple volumes reflecting the buildings programmatic function.
Steel frame.
Covered entry without a single ionic column.
Open corner – because they could.
Large float glass panels
$730 per GSF - $292,000 per bed
$730 per GSF - $292,000 per bed
Talk a bit about who you are (and your relationship with MIT)
Word cloud of the categories of industry/area that teams selected as best describing their projects.