The document summarizes a public meeting regarding a pilot study for King Street in Toronto. It outlines 7 starting points for improving transit service and the public realm on King Street, which experiences overcapacity transit. It then discusses 5 potential block options - separated lanes, alternating local access loops, and a transit promenade. The document proposes evaluating the pilot based on metrics like transit, walking, cycling, traffic, public space and economic impacts. It identifies neighborhoods from Dufferin to the Don River as potential pilot areas based on transit performance, street connectivity and ridership. The public meeting included breakout groups to discuss evaluating success, block options and potential pilot neighborhood contexts.
3. Transit service is beyond capacity, and fast and reliable service cannot be achieved while accommodating
the existing volume of cars. For the duration of the pilot, the transit experience should be improved.
18
1 - TRANSIT FIRST!
4. Operational and regulatory initiatives have already been implemented to improve streetcar service on King
Street. It’s time for a bigger move on King Street.
19
2 - A BIGGER MOVE
5. King Street should provide safe, comfortable and accessible sidewalk, road crossing and streetcar
boarding facilities for all users - regardless of physical ability or age.
Swanston Street, Melbourne Swanston Street, Melbourne
20
3 - SAFE & ACCESSIBLE
6. Improving the transit experience on King Street should also transform the public realm experience
for increasing numbers of pedestrians to help address open space deficits along the corridor.
Bourke Street, Melbourne Queens Quay,Toronto
21
4 - PUBLIC LIFE!
7. King Street is one ofToronto’s defining streets. A transformation of King Street should listen to the
street, reinforcing - and amplifying - King’s diverse neighbourhood identities.
22
5 - UNIQUELY KING
8. A successful pilot should strive to address local and network needs. The design must be flexible and
respond to a variety of uses and users.
446 on-street
parking spaces
37 taxi stands
77 driveways
10 underground
garages
23
6 - MICRO AND MACRO
9. How should we evaluate success on King Street? What do we need to measure?Together, let’s
choose the metrics that we feel are the best measures of success on King Street.
the central city. These vehicles
can have a damaging impact
on inner urban amenity and the
environmental performance of
the public transport network as
a whole. Reliance on diesel also
exposes the bus industry to the
risks of future oil price fluctuations.
Objectives and actions
Balance and optimise the
network
Investment in the bus system can
be a relatively cost effective way
of improving public transport
service provision. Enhancing
existing bus routes or adding new
routes to the network can also
act as a precursor to future rail
and tram network extensions.
The initiatives proposed in the
Bus Service Review should
be implemented. Some of the
network changes and additional
bus network alterations are
shown in this strategy.
160
860
113
747
343
227
144
855
175
670
44
320
256
1,259
256
269
Fig 8.1 Daily Bus volumes in the Central City, Source: Department of Transport
Measuring the Street, NewYork City PassengerVolumes, MelbourneTransport Strategy
24
7 - MEANINGFUL METRICS
13. 5
Busiest surface transit route in the entire city:
65,000+ riders.
Not working well for transit: Slow travel
speeds, unreliable headways, overcrowding.
Future Downtown growth and latent demand
will continue to add to transit ridership pressures.
Operational improvements have been done,
but there are limits when streetcars run in
mixed traffic.
Important Downtown east-west spine for
housing, jobs, culture, heritage, entertainment,
and retail.
Serves the largest concentration of jobs in the
City, Region, and entire country.
Downtown residents are driving less: 75%
walk, cycle or take transit.
There is economic value for local businesses
in investing in the public realm.
Other cities are successfully transforming
their streetcar streets.
Allocation of space on King Street hasn’t
changed in 100 years.
WHY KING?
15. 8
3.2m3.2m
Existing ROW 20.0m
3.2m
Sidewalk
3.6m
Sidewalk
3.6m3.2m
Vehicular / Transit ROW
12.8m
P P
N S
DRIVERS
64% SPACE
KING MOVES 16% OF USERS BY CAR, YET CARS ARE ALLOCATED
64% OF SPACE
CYCLISTS
0% SPACE
PEDS
25% SPACE
TRANSIT
32% SPACE
84%
USERS
16%
USERS
SPACE VS. USE
16% USE
1% USE
50% USE
33% USE
16. 9
Swanston Street, MelbourneUnion Square, New York City Queens Quay,Toronto
AN OPPORTUNITY TO IMPROVE PUBLIC SPACE ALONG AN IMPORTANT
TRANSIT CORRIDOR
17. 10
.....Because King Street is not
reaching its full potential!
A pilot is a chance to test what
King Street could be.
20. 13
STUDY PHASES
We are
here!
Phase One:
Develop Goals &
Pilot Options
Phase Two:
Evaluate & Select
Preferred Pilot(s)
Phase Three:
Design & Implement
Preferred Pilot(s)
Public & Stakeholder Engagement
King Street Modelling Study
TTC Board Meeting
Economic Impact Study
City Council Meeting
WINTER SPRING FALLSUMMER
21. 14
KING STREET MODELLING STUDY
February 2017: Data collection, assembly, and model network development
March 2017: Development of travel demand for study area
April 2017: Development and assessment of alternative scenarios using traffic capacity analysis
and microscopic simulation
Late 2017: Modelling Study continues during initial monitoring period of Pilot project
Data collection within the Modelling Study, as well as the scenario modelling itself, will inform the Pilot
Study, and the report to Council on the preferred Pilot option.
The Modelling Study will use microsimulation to test options and to analyze transit and traffic impacts on
King Street and the surrounding street network.
22. LAKE SHORE BLVD. E.
BROADVIEWAV.
DUNDAS
EASTERN AV.
KING
QUEEN
DUNDAS
CARLTON
PARLIAMENT
JARVIS
QUEEN'SPARKCR.
UNIVERSITY
SPADINA
BATHURST
LAKE SHORE
YONGE
OSSINGTON
DOVERCOURT
DUFFERIN
LANSDOWNE
KING
QUEEN
COLLEGE
RONCESVALLESAV.
BAYVIEWAV.
RICHMOND ST.
ADELAIDE
WELLINGTON
BAY
LAKE
SHORE
SHERBOURNE
KING STREET
Primary Study Area
Secondary Study Area
King Street
15
KING STREET MODELLING STUDY MAP
23. 16
UNDERSTANDING ECONOMIC & BUSINESS IMPACTS
Phase 1 - Initial Scoping and Engagement (ongoing)
• Engage with the three BIAs and and non-BIA businesses along central portion of King Street.
• Identify immediate interests, challenges, and opportunities. Develop the scope and methodology of
a future Economic Impact Measurement and Monitoring Study.
Phase 2 – Economic Impact Measurement and Monitoring Study
• Retain a consultant team to analyze, monitor and measure economic conditions along King Street
during the pilot project.
It is critical to understand the business and economic interests and impacts throughout the King Street
Pilot Study. The City is undertaking two phases of work:
28. ...bridging the gap between decision makers and citizens.
29Gehl
A clear and shared vision
Bridging the gap between decision makers
and citizens
A CLEAR AND SHARED VISION...
29. Pilots are a tool for engagement, to learn through iteration aimed at arriving at a better outcome.
30
PILOTING CHANGE - TESTING NEW SOLUTIONS
Piloting Change – testing new solutions
Measure, Test, Refine
Measure use and behavior Test at scale 1:1 Adapt and LearnMeasure Use and Behaviour Test at Scale 1:1 Adapt and Learn
32. 39
BATHURST
DUFFERIN
LibertyVillage / NiagaraRoncesvalles
RONCESVALLES-LIBERTY VILLAGE: RONCESVALLES TO BATHURST
RONCESVALLES
NEIGHBOURHOOD CONTEXT
Maintain ‘neighourhood’ character of the street,
including easy access to local businesses and parking
during off-peak hours. Here, it seems to actually support
the kind of uses we see on King.
33. 40
KING WEST: BATHURST TO SPADINA
NEIGHBOURHOOD CONTEXT
SPADINA
KingWest
BATHURST
Expand the public realm to alleviate the public space
deficit in this intensifying neighbourhood, whilst
maintaining access to local needs.Activate the
laneways!
34. 41
Entertainment District
SPADINA
UNIVERSITY
ENTERTAINMENT DISTRICT: SPADINA TO UNIVERSITY
NEIGHBOURHOOD CONTEXT
Lots of curbside demand along the north-side, but
less on the south-side.This opens up the potential for a
big public realm move that could expand the territory of
David Pecaut Square and restaurant row.
35. 42
Financial District
UNIVERSITY
YONGE
FINANCIAL DISTRICT: UNIVERSITY TO YONGE
NEIGHBOURHOOD CONTEXT
Sidewalks are wider due to tall building setbacks,
which is useful because a plethora of curbside activities
will need to be addressed.A cycling solution could be
beneficial - it is the one break in theAdelaide bike lane.
36. 43
JARVIS
St James Park
YONGE
ST. JAMES PARK: YONGE TO JARVIS
NEIGHBOURHOOD CONTEXT
Big chance for a full transit promenade here, since we
may not need to accommodate local access points off
King. Could be a chance to provide great transit, plus
extend the St. James Park experience into King itself.
37. 44
PARLIAMENT
JARVIS
King East Don RiverValley
KING EAST: JARVIS TO THE DON RIVER
DONRIVER
NEIGHBOURHOOD CONTEXT
The next KingWest? Growing, and needing more public
realm for sure, but still very much in need of local access
and curbside for small businesses.
38. 46
EXISTING TRANSIT PERFORMANCE: SPEED AND RELIABILITY
DUFFERIN
BATHURST
SPADINA
UNIVERSITY
YONGE
PARLIAMENT
JARVIS
BASED ON WEEKDAY TTC DATA, SEPTEMBER 2013-SEPTEMBER 2015
>>>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>>>
>>>
>>>
AM
MID
PM
15km/h 10-14km/h 8-10km/h 6-8km/h
Reliability
Speed
RONCESVALLES
39. 47
STREET NETWORK CONNECTIVITY
Limited traffic network options
= more impact.
More traffic network options
= less impact.
DUFFERIN
BATHURST
SPADINA
UNIVERSITY
YONGE
PARLIAMENT
JARVIS
RONCESVALLES
RICHMOND
ADELAIDE
WELLINGTON
FRONT
40. 48
WHERE STREETCAR RIDERSHIP IS #1
Between Dufferin and Broadview, the majority of people moving on King Street are on
the streetcar, despite the sub-par experience.
DUFFERIN
BATHURST
SPADINA
UNIVERSITY
YONGE
PARLIAMENT
JARVIS
RONCESVALLES
41. 49
PROPOSED PILOT AREA: BATHURST TO JARVIS (PARLIAMENT?)
DUFFERIN
BATHURST
SPADINA
UNIVERSITY
YONGE
PARLIAMENT
JARVIS
Strategic improvements to supplement
the main pilot area.
High priority for an ambitious
transformation of King Street.
RONCESVALLES
43. 33
PILOT BLOCK OPTIONS
A - SEPARATED LANES B - ALTERNATING ‘LOOPS’ C - TRANSIT PROMENADE
THROUGH TRAFFIC LOCAL ACCESS ONLY
44. 34
OPTION A: SEPARATED LANES
• Physically separated streetcar
lanes
• Through traffic, curbside lane
• No left turns
• No curbside stopping
• Right turning vehicles will back
up traffic
• Nearside boarding, similar to
existing
• No change in public realm
• Cyclists share curbside lane with
vehicles
45. 35
OPTION B1: ALTERNATING ‘LOOPS’
• Streetcar priority lanes
• Local access, right-turn only
‘loops’, one side
• No left turns
• Curbside activity, one side
• Right turning vehicles isolated
from streetcar lane
• Accessible farside boarding
from curb lane, where possible
• Activates the edge, one side
• Curbside lane shared between
cyclists and vehicles on one side
• Public realm in curbside lane
split between pedestrians and
cyclists on other side
46. 36
OPTION B2: CYCLING INFRASTRUCTURE
• Streetcar priority lanes
• Local access, right-turn only
‘loops’, one side
• No left turns
• Curbside activity, one side
• Right turning vehicles isolated
from streetcar lane
• Accessible farside boarding
from curb lane, where possible
• Curbside lane shared between
cyclists and vehicles on one side
• Cycling infrastructure replaces
public realm in curbside lane
47. 37
OPTION C: TRANSIT PROMENADE
• Streetcar priority lanes
• Local access, right-turn only
‘loops’, both sides
• No left turns
• Curbside activity, both sides
• Right turning vehicles isolated
from streetcar lane
• Accessible farside boarding
from curb lane, all stops
• Activates the edge, both sides
• Public realm in curbside lane
split between pedestrians and
cyclists on both sides
49. REPORT BACK, WRAP UP & NEXT STEPS
How should we define success on King?What do we need to measure?
What criteria should we use when determining the extent of the pilot?
STATION 1 - EVALUATING SUCCESS (25 MIN)
What do you think are the pros and cons of each block option?
STATION 2 - BLOCK OPTIONS (25 MIN)
What are some key considerations the team should be aware of in each neighbourhood context?
What ideas would you like to see explored in each neighbourhood context?
STATION 3 - WHERE SHOULD WE PILOT? (25 MIN)
Rotate!
Rotate!
51
THREE CONCURRENT, ROTATING STATIONS: