SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 11
Download to read offline
Valuation of AirThread Connections
Prepared 11.12.2016 by:
Delphine Finders-Binje
Hermine Theunissen
Kim Pierlot
OphΓ©lie Simonart
Vitaly Pentegov
2
Contents
Valuation Methods
Cash Flows Calculation
Discount Rate
Terminal Value
Enterprise Value
Tax Shield
3
Valuation Methods
DCF
APV
Value of
Equity
Value of
Debt
Value of All-
equity Firm
Value of
Tax Shield
Description
Intrinsic value of the
company was
calculated as the sum
of free cash flows
generated by the
upstream assets
discounted by specific
cost of capital
Consideration
β€’ Give theoretically right result if there is
an implicit assumption that the financial
structure will remain constant.
β€’ If debt is expected not to increase with
the enterprise value but to remain
stable or decrease over time, WACC
valuation is not appropriate.
Description Consideration
NPV of company if
financed solely by
equity plus the present
value of any financing
benefits, which are the
additional effects of
debt.
β€’ If debt levels are scheduled to decrease
through time, it overestimates the beta,
and therefore underestimates the value.
4
Cash Flows Calculation
Sources:
Growth NFA: -1.0123%
sum NFA 2005 4,876.35
sum NFA2006 4,825.70
sum NFA 2007 4,778.12
sum NFA 2008 4,729.75
sum NFA 2009 4,681.87
sum NFA 2010 4,634.48
sum NFA 2011 4,587.56
sum NFA 2012 4,541.12
Growth K 7.99%
K 2005 2,741.04
K 2006 2,993.28
K 2007 3,196.16
K 2008 3,451.53
K 2009 3,727.31
K 2010 4,025.12
K 2011 4,346.72
K 2012 4,694.03
Cash Flows
CF op 988.46 1,126.85 1,256.52 1,372.55 1,458.35
NI 283.23 322.89 389.08 450.18 505.44
Dep 705.23 803.96 867.44 922.38 952.91
delta WCR 0 0 0 0 0
CF inv (753.6) (851.8) (914.8) (969.3) (999.4)
delta NFA (48.37) (47.88) (47.39) (46.91) (46.44)
Depreciation (705.2) (804.0) (867.4) (922.4) (952.9)
CF fin 255.37 275.78 297.81 321.61 347.30
delta K 255.37 275.78 297.81 321.61 347.30
delta D 0 0 0 0 0
Div 0 0 0 0 0
Operating
Cash Flows
Investing
Cash Flows
Financing
Cash Flows
5
Discount Rate
Sources: US Treasury, Case assumptions, Team estimates * no preferred equity in case
WACC
Cost of Debt Comparable Companies Unlevered Beta
Cost of Debt 8.4% Predicted Debt/ Marginal Unlevered
Tax Rate 40.0% Company
Levered
Beta(4) Equity Tax Rate Beta
After-tax Cost of Debt 5.1% Universal Mobile 0.86 58.3% 40.0% 0.64
Neuberger Wireless 0.89 41.9% 40.0% 0.71
Cost of Equity Agile Connections 1.17 24.1% 40.0% 1.02
Risk Free Rate 4.4%
Big Country
Communications 0.97 31.7% 40.0% 0.81
Equity risk premium 5.0%
Rocky Mountain
Wireless 1.13 44.4% 40.0% 0.89
Levered Beta 1.02 Mean 1.00 40.1% 0.82
Cost of Equity 9.5% Median 0.97 41.9% 0.81
WACC 8.2% ValueCo Relevered Beta
Mean Target Target
Unlevered Debt/ Marginal Relevered
Beta Equity Tax Rate Beta
Relevered Beta 0.82 42.2% 40.0% 1.02
CAPM:
Γ— ( )
Unlevered Levered
US Treasury 20Y
Weight of
equity in
capital
structure *
Weight of debt
in capital
structure
Interest Expense / Debt
6
Terminal Value
Sources: Case, Team estimates
Growth rate= ROC Γ— Reinvestment Rate
Terminal Growth Rate
ROC 5.88%
Reinvestment rate 59.90%
CapEx 548.52
Ξ”WCR 231.30
D&A 582.269
NOPAT 329.79
Growth rate 3.52%
𝑁𝑁𝑁𝑁𝑁𝑁𝑁𝑁𝑁𝑁
𝐷𝐷 + 𝐸𝐸
𝐢𝐢𝐢𝐢𝐢𝐢𝐢𝐢𝐢𝐢 + π›₯π›₯π‘Šπ‘Šπ‘Šπ‘Šπ‘Šπ‘Š βˆ’ 𝐷𝐷&𝐴𝐴
𝑁𝑁𝑁𝑁𝑁𝑁𝑁𝑁𝑁𝑁
Growth
Rate
Terminal
Value
Terminal Value
FCFF 2012 367.61
FCFF 2012 (1+g) 380.55
Terminal Value 8145.79
𝑇𝑇𝑇𝑇 = 𝐹𝐹𝐹𝐹𝐹𝐹𝐹𝐹𝑛𝑛 + 𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸 𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸 π‘šπ‘šπ‘šπ‘šπ‘šπ‘šπ‘šπ‘šπ‘šπ‘šπ‘šπ‘šπ‘šπ‘šπ‘šπ‘š Γ— 𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸 𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸
Perpetuate Growth Method
Multiple Method
7 852.7
7
Enterprise Value
The enterprise value is calculated by: Example of 2008 FCF calculation
EBIT
less: taxes
plus: D&A
less: CapEx
less: change in NWC
0.0
100.0
200.0
300.0
400.0
500.0
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
FCFF FCFF (discounted)
FCFF calculation for EV
CapEx = Ending PP&E + Depreciation – Beginning PP&E
Ξ”Net Working Capital = (End. Current Assets – End. Current Liabilities) - (Beg. Current Assets – Beg. Current Liabilities)
EV Calculation
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 DCF analysis numbers
EBIT 405.9 462.7 557.6 645.2 724.4 Tax Rate 40.00%
less: taxes (127.3) (150.0) (187.9) (223.0) (254.6) Net Debt $797.8
plus: D&A 705.2 804.0 867.4 922.4 952.9
less: CapEx (631.3) (719.7) (867.4) (970.1) (1,055.0) EBITDA multiple (historical)
less: change in NWC 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 EV/EBITDA, x 10
FCFF 352.6 397.0 369.7 374.5 367.6
Terminal Value
(growth) 8,145.8 APV method
Terminal Value
(EBITDA) 7,852.7 PV(FCF)+TV 6366.62
EV (growth method) 6,725 PV (TV TS) 990.13
EV (multiple method) 6,527 EV 7,357
Sources: Team estimates, case description
8
Synergy Assumption
Sources: Team estimates, case description * perpetual growth method
Synergy
Cost Synergy Revenue Synergy
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
System Operating
Expenses 838.87 956.31 1075.85 1183.43 1266.27
Av. Monthly
subscribers 0.3 0.5 0.7 1 1.2
System Operating
Exp./Service
Revenue 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20
Av. Monthly
Minutes 859 885 911 939 967
Estimated Costs 167.77 191.26 215.17 236.69 253.25
Total Monthly
Minutes 258 443 638 939 1160
Reduction 0.00 0.07 0.12 0.22 0.30 Revenue per minute 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05
Savings 0.00 13.39 25.82 52.54 75.98 Revenue Increase 156.48 268.69 387.21 570.16 704.59
0
200
400
600
800
1000
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
FCF (no synergy) Synergy Contibution
Assuming Ms. Zhang's estimates for synergies
Enterprise Value
EV calculation
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 DCF analysis adjustments APV method
EBIT 405.9 462.7 557.6 645.2 724.4 Tax Rate 40.00% PV(FCF)+TV 13630.77
Synergy adj. EBIT 562.4 744.8 970.6 1,267.9 1,504.9 Net Debt $797.8 PV (TV TS) 990.13
less: taxes (189.9) (262.8) (353.2) (472.1) (566.9) EV 14620.90
plus: D&A 705.2 804.0 867.4 922.4 952.9 EBITDA mult
less: CapEx (631.3) (719.7) (867.4) (970.1) (1,055.0) EV/EBITDA, x 10
less: change in NWC 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
FCFF 446.5 566.3 617.5 748.1 836.0
Terminal Value (growth) 18,523.6
Terminal Value
(EBITDA) 16,387.0
EV (growth method) 14,425
EV (multiple method) 12,984
We get the following enterprise value numbers
+ $7700 MM
Synergy
contribution
to the AirThread’s
Enterprise Value *
Synergy contribution to the free cash flows
9
Valuation Graph
Sources: Team estimates
$0.00 $5,000.00 $10,000.00 $15,000.00 $20,000.00 $25,000.00
DCF, WACC
2007 P/E:
2007 EV/EBITDA:
2007 EV/Revenue:
Min to 25th
25th to Median
Median to 75th
75th to Max
Public Company
Comparables
Discounted Cash Flow
Analysis
10
Tax Shield Consideration
Sources: Berk/DeMarzo – Corporate Finance
The value of the tax shields reflect the personal tax disadvantage of interest income to ordinary
debt holders as personal taxes may offset the corporate tax benefits of leverage. Investors are
generally taxed on interest income from debt and dividend income from a stock; they are also
taxed on capital gains when they sell a stock.
Where,
τ𝑒𝑒 - the personal tax rate on equity income
τ𝑖𝑖 - the personal tax rate on interest income
τ𝑐𝑐 - corporate tax
Tax Shield = Ο„βˆ— Γ— interest expense
Therefore, if τ𝑒𝑒 > τ𝑖𝑖 then Ο„βˆ—
> τ𝑐𝑐 then there is a tax disadvantage of leverage
Thank you for your attention!

More Related Content

What's hot

The Walt Disney: The Entertainment King
The Walt Disney: The Entertainment KingThe Walt Disney: The Entertainment King
The Walt Disney: The Entertainment KingAnuj Poddar
Β 
Rudy wong , investment advisor
Rudy wong , investment advisorRudy wong , investment advisor
Rudy wong , investment advisorSahil Bakshi
Β 
Cooper industries Case Study
Cooper industries Case StudyCooper industries Case Study
Cooper industries Case StudyPrashant S. Keswani
Β 
Eastboro case analysis
Eastboro case analysisEastboro case analysis
Eastboro case analysisFajar Muhammad
Β 
Applications for financial futures
Applications for financial futuresApplications for financial futures
Applications for financial futuresFuturum2
Β 
Acquisition of Mercury Athletic
Acquisition of Mercury AthleticAcquisition of Mercury Athletic
Acquisition of Mercury AthleticJB Gough
Β 
The Harvard Graduate Student Housing Survey
The Harvard Graduate Student Housing SurveyThe Harvard Graduate Student Housing Survey
The Harvard Graduate Student Housing SurveyArushi Verma
Β 
Winfield Refuse Management Inc. Raising Debt vs. Equity
Winfield Refuse Management Inc.Raising Debt vs. EquityWinfield Refuse Management Inc.Raising Debt vs. Equity
Winfield Refuse Management Inc. Raising Debt vs. Equitysubhash kalal
Β 
Merger of vodafone and hutch
Merger of vodafone and hutchMerger of vodafone and hutch
Merger of vodafone and hutchSSbm1
Β 
S51 - Ben & Jerry's in Japan
S51 - Ben & Jerry's in JapanS51 - Ben & Jerry's in Japan
S51 - Ben & Jerry's in JapanJochem Donkers
Β 
Midland Energy Resources, Inc. Cost of Capital
Midland Energy Resources, Inc. Cost of CapitalMidland Energy Resources, Inc. Cost of Capital
Midland Energy Resources, Inc. Cost of CapitalKivanc Ozuolmez
Β 
Microsoft nokia-acquisition
Microsoft nokia-acquisitionMicrosoft nokia-acquisition
Microsoft nokia-acquisitionA P
Β 
case study analysis hp and compaq
 case study analysis hp and compaq  case study analysis hp and compaq
case study analysis hp and compaq Mayank Garg
Β 
Merger & acquisition, Hindalco Novelis
Merger & acquisition, Hindalco NovelisMerger & acquisition, Hindalco Novelis
Merger & acquisition, Hindalco NovelisGagan Pareek, PMP
Β 
Brannigan Foods Case Study Exercise
Brannigan Foods Case Study ExerciseBrannigan Foods Case Study Exercise
Brannigan Foods Case Study ExerciseJuan Manuel Restrepo
Β 
Mercury case
Mercury caseMercury case
Mercury caseTHAO BUI
Β 
Study of the Nokia - Microsoft Deal (Research Project)
Study of the Nokia - Microsoft Deal (Research Project)Study of the Nokia - Microsoft Deal (Research Project)
Study of the Nokia - Microsoft Deal (Research Project)Ishan Parekh
Β 
Case Analysis of Molycorp: Financing the Production of Rare Earth Minerals”
Case Analysis of Molycorp: Financing the Production of Rare Earth Minerals”Case Analysis of Molycorp: Financing the Production of Rare Earth Minerals”
Case Analysis of Molycorp: Financing the Production of Rare Earth Minerals”Rifat Ahsan
Β 
The Walt Disney Company and Pixar Inc.: To Acquire or Not to Acquire
The Walt Disney Company and Pixar Inc.: To Acquire or Not to AcquireThe Walt Disney Company and Pixar Inc.: To Acquire or Not to Acquire
The Walt Disney Company and Pixar Inc.: To Acquire or Not to AcquireEric Moon
Β 

What's hot (20)

The Walt Disney: The Entertainment King
The Walt Disney: The Entertainment KingThe Walt Disney: The Entertainment King
The Walt Disney: The Entertainment King
Β 
Rudy wong , investment advisor
Rudy wong , investment advisorRudy wong , investment advisor
Rudy wong , investment advisor
Β 
Cooper industries Case Study
Cooper industries Case StudyCooper industries Case Study
Cooper industries Case Study
Β 
Eastboro case analysis
Eastboro case analysisEastboro case analysis
Eastboro case analysis
Β 
Applications for financial futures
Applications for financial futuresApplications for financial futures
Applications for financial futures
Β 
Acquisition of Mercury Athletic
Acquisition of Mercury AthleticAcquisition of Mercury Athletic
Acquisition of Mercury Athletic
Β 
The Harvard Graduate Student Housing Survey
The Harvard Graduate Student Housing SurveyThe Harvard Graduate Student Housing Survey
The Harvard Graduate Student Housing Survey
Β 
Winfield Refuse Management Inc. Raising Debt vs. Equity
Winfield Refuse Management Inc.Raising Debt vs. EquityWinfield Refuse Management Inc.Raising Debt vs. Equity
Winfield Refuse Management Inc. Raising Debt vs. Equity
Β 
Merger of vodafone and hutch
Merger of vodafone and hutchMerger of vodafone and hutch
Merger of vodafone and hutch
Β 
S51 - Ben & Jerry's in Japan
S51 - Ben & Jerry's in JapanS51 - Ben & Jerry's in Japan
S51 - Ben & Jerry's in Japan
Β 
Midland Energy Resources, Inc. Cost of Capital
Midland Energy Resources, Inc. Cost of CapitalMidland Energy Resources, Inc. Cost of Capital
Midland Energy Resources, Inc. Cost of Capital
Β 
Microsoft nokia-acquisition
Microsoft nokia-acquisitionMicrosoft nokia-acquisition
Microsoft nokia-acquisition
Β 
case study analysis hp and compaq
 case study analysis hp and compaq  case study analysis hp and compaq
case study analysis hp and compaq
Β 
Merger & acquisition, Hindalco Novelis
Merger & acquisition, Hindalco NovelisMerger & acquisition, Hindalco Novelis
Merger & acquisition, Hindalco Novelis
Β 
Brannigan Foods Case Study Exercise
Brannigan Foods Case Study ExerciseBrannigan Foods Case Study Exercise
Brannigan Foods Case Study Exercise
Β 
Spyder_ Final
Spyder_ FinalSpyder_ Final
Spyder_ Final
Β 
Mercury case
Mercury caseMercury case
Mercury case
Β 
Study of the Nokia - Microsoft Deal (Research Project)
Study of the Nokia - Microsoft Deal (Research Project)Study of the Nokia - Microsoft Deal (Research Project)
Study of the Nokia - Microsoft Deal (Research Project)
Β 
Case Analysis of Molycorp: Financing the Production of Rare Earth Minerals”
Case Analysis of Molycorp: Financing the Production of Rare Earth Minerals”Case Analysis of Molycorp: Financing the Production of Rare Earth Minerals”
Case Analysis of Molycorp: Financing the Production of Rare Earth Minerals”
Β 
The Walt Disney Company and Pixar Inc.: To Acquire or Not to Acquire
The Walt Disney Company and Pixar Inc.: To Acquire or Not to AcquireThe Walt Disney Company and Pixar Inc.: To Acquire or Not to Acquire
The Walt Disney Company and Pixar Inc.: To Acquire or Not to Acquire
Β 

Viewers also liked

Magnit fy2015 audited_rus
Magnit fy2015 audited_rusMagnit fy2015 audited_rus
Magnit fy2015 audited_rusMagnit IR Team
Β 
1H2007 Results Full
1H2007 Results Full1H2007 Results Full
1H2007 Results FullMagnit IR Team
Β 
Retailing in Russia.ptt
Retailing in Russia.pttRetailing in Russia.ptt
Retailing in Russia.pttNana Amako
Β 
ΠšΠ°Ρ€Ρ‚Π° России - PowerPoint шаблон для создания ΠΏΡ€ΠΎΡ„Π΅ΡΡΠΈΠΎΠ½Π°Π»ΡŒΠ½Ρ‹Ρ… ΠΏΡ€Π΅Π·Π΅Π½Ρ‚Π°Ρ†ΠΈΠΉ
ΠšΠ°Ρ€Ρ‚Π° России - PowerPoint шаблон для создания ΠΏΡ€ΠΎΡ„Π΅ΡΡΠΈΠΎΠ½Π°Π»ΡŒΠ½Ρ‹Ρ… ΠΏΡ€Π΅Π·Π΅Π½Ρ‚Π°Ρ†ΠΈΠΉΠšΠ°Ρ€Ρ‚Π° России - PowerPoint шаблон для создания ΠΏΡ€ΠΎΡ„Π΅ΡΡΠΈΠΎΠ½Π°Π»ΡŒΠ½Ρ‹Ρ… ΠΏΡ€Π΅Π·Π΅Π½Ρ‚Π°Ρ†ΠΈΠΉ
ΠšΠ°Ρ€Ρ‚Π° России - PowerPoint шаблон для создания ΠΏΡ€ΠΎΡ„Π΅ΡΡΠΈΠΎΠ½Π°Π»ΡŒΠ½Ρ‹Ρ… ΠΏΡ€Π΅Π·Π΅Π½Ρ‚Π°Ρ†ΠΈΠΉSlidestore
Β 
Magnit 9 m2016_rus
Magnit 9 m2016_rusMagnit 9 m2016_rus
Magnit 9 m2016_rusMagnit IR Team
Β 

Viewers also liked (6)

Magnit fy2015 audited_rus
Magnit fy2015 audited_rusMagnit fy2015 audited_rus
Magnit fy2015 audited_rus
Β 
1H2007 Results Full
1H2007 Results Full1H2007 Results Full
1H2007 Results Full
Β 
Retailing in Russia.ptt
Retailing in Russia.pttRetailing in Russia.ptt
Retailing in Russia.ptt
Β 
1H 2014 Results
1H 2014 Results1H 2014 Results
1H 2014 Results
Β 
ΠšΠ°Ρ€Ρ‚Π° России - PowerPoint шаблон для создания ΠΏΡ€ΠΎΡ„Π΅ΡΡΠΈΠΎΠ½Π°Π»ΡŒΠ½Ρ‹Ρ… ΠΏΡ€Π΅Π·Π΅Π½Ρ‚Π°Ρ†ΠΈΠΉ
ΠšΠ°Ρ€Ρ‚Π° России - PowerPoint шаблон для создания ΠΏΡ€ΠΎΡ„Π΅ΡΡΠΈΠΎΠ½Π°Π»ΡŒΠ½Ρ‹Ρ… ΠΏΡ€Π΅Π·Π΅Π½Ρ‚Π°Ρ†ΠΈΠΉΠšΠ°Ρ€Ρ‚Π° России - PowerPoint шаблон для создания ΠΏΡ€ΠΎΡ„Π΅ΡΡΠΈΠΎΠ½Π°Π»ΡŒΠ½Ρ‹Ρ… ΠΏΡ€Π΅Π·Π΅Π½Ρ‚Π°Ρ†ΠΈΠΉ
ΠšΠ°Ρ€Ρ‚Π° России - PowerPoint шаблон для создания ΠΏΡ€ΠΎΡ„Π΅ΡΡΠΈΠΎΠ½Π°Π»ΡŒΠ½Ρ‹Ρ… ΠΏΡ€Π΅Π·Π΅Π½Ρ‚Π°Ρ†ΠΈΠΉ
Β 
Magnit 9 m2016_rus
Magnit 9 m2016_rusMagnit 9 m2016_rus
Magnit 9 m2016_rus
Β 

Similar to Template_ver3

Financial Accounting Common Sizing Analysis Report
Financial Accounting Common Sizing Analysis ReportFinancial Accounting Common Sizing Analysis Report
Financial Accounting Common Sizing Analysis ReportNicholas Espinosa
Β 
Credit Corp - turnaround in performance
Credit Corp - turnaround in performance Credit Corp - turnaround in performance
Credit Corp - turnaround in performance George Gabriel
Β 
NETFLIX Business Analysis & Valuation
NETFLIX Business Analysis & ValuationNETFLIX Business Analysis & Valuation
NETFLIX Business Analysis & ValuationAlegra N Horne
Β 
Analysis of financial statements@ bec doms
Analysis of financial statements@ bec domsAnalysis of financial statements@ bec doms
Analysis of financial statements@ bec domsBabasab Patil
Β 
InstructionsThe objective of the Case Debriefings is to revi
InstructionsThe objective of the Case Debriefings is to reviInstructionsThe objective of the Case Debriefings is to revi
InstructionsThe objective of the Case Debriefings is to reviTatianaMajor22
Β 
Fundamental Skills for Real Estate Development Professionals I – Financial An...
Fundamental Skills for Real Estate Development Professionals I – Financial An...Fundamental Skills for Real Estate Development Professionals I – Financial An...
Fundamental Skills for Real Estate Development Professionals I – Financial An...Virtual ULI
Β 
print-to-fit case study of Finance Solution
print-to-fit case study of Finance Solutionprint-to-fit case study of Finance Solution
print-to-fit case study of Finance SolutionTouQeer Ali Abbasi
Β 
Chapter 4 on Valuation and Reporting in Organization
Chapter 4 on Valuation and Reporting in OrganizationChapter 4 on Valuation and Reporting in Organization
Chapter 4 on Valuation and Reporting in OrganizationFirdaus Fitri Zainal Abidin
Β 
Financial analysis of TATA TELESERVICES LTD
Financial analysis of TATA TELESERVICES LTDFinancial analysis of TATA TELESERVICES LTD
Financial analysis of TATA TELESERVICES LTDKHALIL AHMAD
Β 
Financial Managment_haseeb_abduljabbar.pptx
Financial Managment_haseeb_abduljabbar.pptxFinancial Managment_haseeb_abduljabbar.pptx
Financial Managment_haseeb_abduljabbar.pptxHaxiKhan1
Β 
Discounted Cash Flow Method of Valution for Maruti Suzuki
Discounted Cash Flow Method of Valution for Maruti SuzukiDiscounted Cash Flow Method of Valution for Maruti Suzuki
Discounted Cash Flow Method of Valution for Maruti SuzukiPRACHI NAVGHARE
Β 
Tutorial 6 Solutions.docx
Tutorial 6 Solutions.docxTutorial 6 Solutions.docx
Tutorial 6 Solutions.docxLinhLeThiThuy4
Β 
FedEx Stock Presentation
FedEx Stock PresentationFedEx Stock Presentation
FedEx Stock PresentationAshwin Anant
Β 
Analysis of Financial Statements.(Ratio analysis, Du Pont system ,Effects of ...
Analysis of Financial Statements.(Ratio analysis, Du Pont system ,Effects of ...Analysis of Financial Statements.(Ratio analysis, Du Pont system ,Effects of ...
Analysis of Financial Statements.(Ratio analysis, Du Pont system ,Effects of ...Tanjin Tamanna urmi
Β 
Financial Annual Report Common Size
Financial Annual Report Common SizeFinancial Annual Report Common Size
Financial Annual Report Common SizeTaylor Wiley
Β 
ACG Cup Presentation - Round 1
ACG Cup Presentation - Round  1ACG Cup Presentation - Round  1
ACG Cup Presentation - Round 1Milton Parra
Β 
FIN660.v10R.Excel-Based_Spreadsheet_of_How_to_Adjust_Target_Firm.docx
FIN660.v10R.Excel-Based_Spreadsheet_of_How_to_Adjust_Target_Firm.docxFIN660.v10R.Excel-Based_Spreadsheet_of_How_to_Adjust_Target_Firm.docx
FIN660.v10R.Excel-Based_Spreadsheet_of_How_to_Adjust_Target_Firm.docxssuser454af01
Β 
1.Β (TCO A) Below you will find selected information (in millions) .docx
1.Β (TCO A) Below you will find selected information (in millions) .docx1.Β (TCO A) Below you will find selected information (in millions) .docx
1.Β (TCO A) Below you will find selected information (in millions) .docxhyacinthshackley2629
Β 

Similar to Template_ver3 (20)

Financial Accounting Common Sizing Analysis Report
Financial Accounting Common Sizing Analysis ReportFinancial Accounting Common Sizing Analysis Report
Financial Accounting Common Sizing Analysis Report
Β 
Credit Corp - turnaround in performance
Credit Corp - turnaround in performance Credit Corp - turnaround in performance
Credit Corp - turnaround in performance
Β 
NETFLIX Business Analysis & Valuation
NETFLIX Business Analysis & ValuationNETFLIX Business Analysis & Valuation
NETFLIX Business Analysis & Valuation
Β 
Analysis of financial statements@ bec doms
Analysis of financial statements@ bec domsAnalysis of financial statements@ bec doms
Analysis of financial statements@ bec doms
Β 
InstructionsThe objective of the Case Debriefings is to revi
InstructionsThe objective of the Case Debriefings is to reviInstructionsThe objective of the Case Debriefings is to revi
InstructionsThe objective of the Case Debriefings is to revi
Β 
Fundamental Skills for Real Estate Development Professionals I – Financial An...
Fundamental Skills for Real Estate Development Professionals I – Financial An...Fundamental Skills for Real Estate Development Professionals I – Financial An...
Fundamental Skills for Real Estate Development Professionals I – Financial An...
Β 
print-to-fit case study of Finance Solution
print-to-fit case study of Finance Solutionprint-to-fit case study of Finance Solution
print-to-fit case study of Finance Solution
Β 
Chapter 4 on Valuation and Reporting in Organization
Chapter 4 on Valuation and Reporting in OrganizationChapter 4 on Valuation and Reporting in Organization
Chapter 4 on Valuation and Reporting in Organization
Β 
Financial analysis of TATA TELESERVICES LTD
Financial analysis of TATA TELESERVICES LTDFinancial analysis of TATA TELESERVICES LTD
Financial analysis of TATA TELESERVICES LTD
Β 
Financial Managment_haseeb_abduljabbar.pptx
Financial Managment_haseeb_abduljabbar.pptxFinancial Managment_haseeb_abduljabbar.pptx
Financial Managment_haseeb_abduljabbar.pptx
Β 
ch 03 Fin stmts
ch 03 Fin stmtsch 03 Fin stmts
ch 03 Fin stmts
Β 
Discounted Cash Flow Method of Valution for Maruti Suzuki
Discounted Cash Flow Method of Valution for Maruti SuzukiDiscounted Cash Flow Method of Valution for Maruti Suzuki
Discounted Cash Flow Method of Valution for Maruti Suzuki
Β 
Excel Model of Trading Firm
Excel Model of Trading FirmExcel Model of Trading Firm
Excel Model of Trading Firm
Β 
Tutorial 6 Solutions.docx
Tutorial 6 Solutions.docxTutorial 6 Solutions.docx
Tutorial 6 Solutions.docx
Β 
FedEx Stock Presentation
FedEx Stock PresentationFedEx Stock Presentation
FedEx Stock Presentation
Β 
Analysis of Financial Statements.(Ratio analysis, Du Pont system ,Effects of ...
Analysis of Financial Statements.(Ratio analysis, Du Pont system ,Effects of ...Analysis of Financial Statements.(Ratio analysis, Du Pont system ,Effects of ...
Analysis of Financial Statements.(Ratio analysis, Du Pont system ,Effects of ...
Β 
Financial Annual Report Common Size
Financial Annual Report Common SizeFinancial Annual Report Common Size
Financial Annual Report Common Size
Β 
ACG Cup Presentation - Round 1
ACG Cup Presentation - Round  1ACG Cup Presentation - Round  1
ACG Cup Presentation - Round 1
Β 
FIN660.v10R.Excel-Based_Spreadsheet_of_How_to_Adjust_Target_Firm.docx
FIN660.v10R.Excel-Based_Spreadsheet_of_How_to_Adjust_Target_Firm.docxFIN660.v10R.Excel-Based_Spreadsheet_of_How_to_Adjust_Target_Firm.docx
FIN660.v10R.Excel-Based_Spreadsheet_of_How_to_Adjust_Target_Firm.docx
Β 
1.Β (TCO A) Below you will find selected information (in millions) .docx
1.Β (TCO A) Below you will find selected information (in millions) .docx1.Β (TCO A) Below you will find selected information (in millions) .docx
1.Β (TCO A) Below you will find selected information (in millions) .docx
Β 

Template_ver3

  • 1. Valuation of AirThread Connections Prepared 11.12.2016 by: Delphine Finders-Binje Hermine Theunissen Kim Pierlot OphΓ©lie Simonart Vitaly Pentegov
  • 2. 2 Contents Valuation Methods Cash Flows Calculation Discount Rate Terminal Value Enterprise Value Tax Shield
  • 3. 3 Valuation Methods DCF APV Value of Equity Value of Debt Value of All- equity Firm Value of Tax Shield Description Intrinsic value of the company was calculated as the sum of free cash flows generated by the upstream assets discounted by specific cost of capital Consideration β€’ Give theoretically right result if there is an implicit assumption that the financial structure will remain constant. β€’ If debt is expected not to increase with the enterprise value but to remain stable or decrease over time, WACC valuation is not appropriate. Description Consideration NPV of company if financed solely by equity plus the present value of any financing benefits, which are the additional effects of debt. β€’ If debt levels are scheduled to decrease through time, it overestimates the beta, and therefore underestimates the value.
  • 4. 4 Cash Flows Calculation Sources: Growth NFA: -1.0123% sum NFA 2005 4,876.35 sum NFA2006 4,825.70 sum NFA 2007 4,778.12 sum NFA 2008 4,729.75 sum NFA 2009 4,681.87 sum NFA 2010 4,634.48 sum NFA 2011 4,587.56 sum NFA 2012 4,541.12 Growth K 7.99% K 2005 2,741.04 K 2006 2,993.28 K 2007 3,196.16 K 2008 3,451.53 K 2009 3,727.31 K 2010 4,025.12 K 2011 4,346.72 K 2012 4,694.03 Cash Flows CF op 988.46 1,126.85 1,256.52 1,372.55 1,458.35 NI 283.23 322.89 389.08 450.18 505.44 Dep 705.23 803.96 867.44 922.38 952.91 delta WCR 0 0 0 0 0 CF inv (753.6) (851.8) (914.8) (969.3) (999.4) delta NFA (48.37) (47.88) (47.39) (46.91) (46.44) Depreciation (705.2) (804.0) (867.4) (922.4) (952.9) CF fin 255.37 275.78 297.81 321.61 347.30 delta K 255.37 275.78 297.81 321.61 347.30 delta D 0 0 0 0 0 Div 0 0 0 0 0 Operating Cash Flows Investing Cash Flows Financing Cash Flows
  • 5. 5 Discount Rate Sources: US Treasury, Case assumptions, Team estimates * no preferred equity in case WACC Cost of Debt Comparable Companies Unlevered Beta Cost of Debt 8.4% Predicted Debt/ Marginal Unlevered Tax Rate 40.0% Company Levered Beta(4) Equity Tax Rate Beta After-tax Cost of Debt 5.1% Universal Mobile 0.86 58.3% 40.0% 0.64 Neuberger Wireless 0.89 41.9% 40.0% 0.71 Cost of Equity Agile Connections 1.17 24.1% 40.0% 1.02 Risk Free Rate 4.4% Big Country Communications 0.97 31.7% 40.0% 0.81 Equity risk premium 5.0% Rocky Mountain Wireless 1.13 44.4% 40.0% 0.89 Levered Beta 1.02 Mean 1.00 40.1% 0.82 Cost of Equity 9.5% Median 0.97 41.9% 0.81 WACC 8.2% ValueCo Relevered Beta Mean Target Target Unlevered Debt/ Marginal Relevered Beta Equity Tax Rate Beta Relevered Beta 0.82 42.2% 40.0% 1.02 CAPM: Γ— ( ) Unlevered Levered US Treasury 20Y Weight of equity in capital structure * Weight of debt in capital structure Interest Expense / Debt
  • 6. 6 Terminal Value Sources: Case, Team estimates Growth rate= ROC Γ— Reinvestment Rate Terminal Growth Rate ROC 5.88% Reinvestment rate 59.90% CapEx 548.52 Ξ”WCR 231.30 D&A 582.269 NOPAT 329.79 Growth rate 3.52% 𝑁𝑁𝑁𝑁𝑁𝑁𝑁𝑁𝑁𝑁 𝐷𝐷 + 𝐸𝐸 𝐢𝐢𝐢𝐢𝐢𝐢𝐢𝐢𝐢𝐢 + π›₯π›₯π‘Šπ‘Šπ‘Šπ‘Šπ‘Šπ‘Š βˆ’ 𝐷𝐷&𝐴𝐴 𝑁𝑁𝑁𝑁𝑁𝑁𝑁𝑁𝑁𝑁 Growth Rate Terminal Value Terminal Value FCFF 2012 367.61 FCFF 2012 (1+g) 380.55 Terminal Value 8145.79 𝑇𝑇𝑇𝑇 = 𝐹𝐹𝐹𝐹𝐹𝐹𝐹𝐹𝑛𝑛 + 𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸 𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸 π‘šπ‘šπ‘šπ‘šπ‘šπ‘šπ‘šπ‘šπ‘šπ‘šπ‘šπ‘šπ‘šπ‘šπ‘šπ‘š Γ— 𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸 𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸𝐸 Perpetuate Growth Method Multiple Method 7 852.7
  • 7. 7 Enterprise Value The enterprise value is calculated by: Example of 2008 FCF calculation EBIT less: taxes plus: D&A less: CapEx less: change in NWC 0.0 100.0 200.0 300.0 400.0 500.0 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 FCFF FCFF (discounted) FCFF calculation for EV CapEx = Ending PP&E + Depreciation – Beginning PP&E Ξ”Net Working Capital = (End. Current Assets – End. Current Liabilities) - (Beg. Current Assets – Beg. Current Liabilities) EV Calculation 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 DCF analysis numbers EBIT 405.9 462.7 557.6 645.2 724.4 Tax Rate 40.00% less: taxes (127.3) (150.0) (187.9) (223.0) (254.6) Net Debt $797.8 plus: D&A 705.2 804.0 867.4 922.4 952.9 less: CapEx (631.3) (719.7) (867.4) (970.1) (1,055.0) EBITDA multiple (historical) less: change in NWC 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 EV/EBITDA, x 10 FCFF 352.6 397.0 369.7 374.5 367.6 Terminal Value (growth) 8,145.8 APV method Terminal Value (EBITDA) 7,852.7 PV(FCF)+TV 6366.62 EV (growth method) 6,725 PV (TV TS) 990.13 EV (multiple method) 6,527 EV 7,357 Sources: Team estimates, case description
  • 8. 8 Synergy Assumption Sources: Team estimates, case description * perpetual growth method Synergy Cost Synergy Revenue Synergy 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 System Operating Expenses 838.87 956.31 1075.85 1183.43 1266.27 Av. Monthly subscribers 0.3 0.5 0.7 1 1.2 System Operating Exp./Service Revenue 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 Av. Monthly Minutes 859 885 911 939 967 Estimated Costs 167.77 191.26 215.17 236.69 253.25 Total Monthly Minutes 258 443 638 939 1160 Reduction 0.00 0.07 0.12 0.22 0.30 Revenue per minute 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 Savings 0.00 13.39 25.82 52.54 75.98 Revenue Increase 156.48 268.69 387.21 570.16 704.59 0 200 400 600 800 1000 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 FCF (no synergy) Synergy Contibution Assuming Ms. Zhang's estimates for synergies Enterprise Value EV calculation 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 DCF analysis adjustments APV method EBIT 405.9 462.7 557.6 645.2 724.4 Tax Rate 40.00% PV(FCF)+TV 13630.77 Synergy adj. EBIT 562.4 744.8 970.6 1,267.9 1,504.9 Net Debt $797.8 PV (TV TS) 990.13 less: taxes (189.9) (262.8) (353.2) (472.1) (566.9) EV 14620.90 plus: D&A 705.2 804.0 867.4 922.4 952.9 EBITDA mult less: CapEx (631.3) (719.7) (867.4) (970.1) (1,055.0) EV/EBITDA, x 10 less: change in NWC 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 FCFF 446.5 566.3 617.5 748.1 836.0 Terminal Value (growth) 18,523.6 Terminal Value (EBITDA) 16,387.0 EV (growth method) 14,425 EV (multiple method) 12,984 We get the following enterprise value numbers + $7700 MM Synergy contribution to the AirThread’s Enterprise Value * Synergy contribution to the free cash flows
  • 9. 9 Valuation Graph Sources: Team estimates $0.00 $5,000.00 $10,000.00 $15,000.00 $20,000.00 $25,000.00 DCF, WACC 2007 P/E: 2007 EV/EBITDA: 2007 EV/Revenue: Min to 25th 25th to Median Median to 75th 75th to Max Public Company Comparables Discounted Cash Flow Analysis
  • 10. 10 Tax Shield Consideration Sources: Berk/DeMarzo – Corporate Finance The value of the tax shields reflect the personal tax disadvantage of interest income to ordinary debt holders as personal taxes may offset the corporate tax benefits of leverage. Investors are generally taxed on interest income from debt and dividend income from a stock; they are also taxed on capital gains when they sell a stock. Where, τ𝑒𝑒 - the personal tax rate on equity income τ𝑖𝑖 - the personal tax rate on interest income τ𝑐𝑐 - corporate tax Tax Shield = Ο„βˆ— Γ— interest expense Therefore, if τ𝑒𝑒 > τ𝑖𝑖 then Ο„βˆ— > τ𝑐𝑐 then there is a tax disadvantage of leverage
  • 11. Thank you for your attention!