Presentation delivered by Dr Awad Mataria, Regional Adviser, Health Systems Development at the 62nd Session of the WHO Regional Committee for the Eastern Mediterranean
💎VVIP Kolkata Call Girls Parganas🩱7001035870🩱Independent Girl ( Ac Rooms Avai...
Social health insurance for universal health coverage
1. Social Health Insurance for Universal
Health Coverage
Technical Meeting
62nd Session of the WHO Regional Committee
for the Eastern Mediterranean
5-8 OCTOBER 2015, Kuwait
2. Health Financing Systems and Universal
Health Coverage
• In 2005, Member States endorsed a Resolution that
urges countries to develop their health financing
systems to:
- Ensure that all people have access to needed
services without the risk of financial hardship
• In 2015, Heads of States adopted 17 SDGs with Target
3.8 calling on countries to pursue:
– Universal Health Coverage
4. 4
World Health Organization
The Financing Function
“Collection”
“Purchasing”
“Pooling”
Moving towards Universal Health Coverage Requires
Well-Functioning Health Financing Systems
5. Out-of-Pocket Payments Undermine the Performance of
Health Financing Systems
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
5
Group 3
40–76%
Group 2
24–58%
Group 1
8–20%
Share of OOP in THE by Country Group, 2013
6. 6
GENERAL GOV’T REVENUE
– Financed through budgetary allocation
– Beveridge approach
– Main source of funding in:
• Globally – UK, Australia, Finland, Italy,
Greece, Sweden and others.
• In EMR – G1: GCC “nationals”; G2: Iraq,
Libya; G3: Afghanistan, Pakistan
SOCIAL HEALTH INSURANCE
– Financed through obligatory payroll taxes
– Bismarck approach
– Main source of funding in:
• Globally – Germany, Japan, France, South
Korea, Turkey and others.
• In EMR – G2: I.R. of Iran, Tunisia, Morocco;
G3: Djibouti
OTHER ARRANGEMENTS
– Private Health Insurance – voluntary/for-profit
– Community-Based Health Insurance – voluntary/not-
for-profit
– Medical Saving Accounts – obligatory with no pooling
– Others
Prepayments Options for Countries to Consider
7. 7
General Government Revenue
Strengths
– Pools risks for whole population
– Relies on many different revenue
sources – taxes, natural
resources, others
– Single centralized governance
system with potential for
administrative efficiency and cost
control
Limitations
– Variations in funding and
budgetary allocations due to
changing gov’t priorities
– Often disproportionately benefits
the better off
– Potentially inefficient due to
complex public sector rules and
procedures
8. 8
Social Health Insurance
Strengths
– Mandatory contributions based on
ability-to-pay
– Perceived as a ‘benefit’ tax with
more ‘willingness to pay’
– Protects health financing from
gov’t annual budgetary process
– Additional health revenue source
Limitations
– Potential to exclude the poor and
vulnerable unless subsidized by
gov’t
– Administrative cost can be high if
fragmented
– Benefit packages do not often cover
for promotive/preventive care
– Potential negative impact on
employment because of increased
cost of production
9. 9
GENERAL GOV’T REVENUE
– Financed through budgetary allocation
– Beveridge approach
– Main source of funding in:
• Globally – UK, Australia, Finland, Italy,
Greece, Sweden and others.
• In EMR – G1: GCC “nationals”; G2: Iraq,
Libya; G3: Afghanistan, Pakistan
SOCIAL HEALTH INSURANCE
– Financed through obligatory payroll taxes
– Bismarck approach
– Main source of funding in:
• Globally – Germany, Japan, France, South
Korea, Turkey and others.
• In EMR – G2: I.R. of Iran, Tunisia, Morocco;
G3: Djibouti
OTHER ARRANGEMENTS
– Private Health Insurance – voluntary/for-profit
– Community-Based Health Insurance – voluntary/not-
for-profit
– Medical Saving Accounts – obligatory with no pooling
– Others
Prepayments Options for Countries to Consider
MIXED OPTION
10. Social Health Insurance Evolution (“SHI for UHC”)
• Historically, SHI covered formal sector (primarily public but
also private) through obligatory payroll taxes
• Today, SHI evolved into a prepayment arrangement that
covers formal and informal sectors and is financed by a
mix of obligatory contributions and government
budgetary allocations
• Why?
– In low- and middle-income countries: large informal sector
(poor and non-poor) and vulnerable populations, unemployment
– In high-income countries: aging populations, “unemployment”
11. 11
“SHI for UHC” in EMR
Scheme 1 Scheme 4 Scheme 3 Scheme 4 Pop (%)
EGY HIO (52%) 52%
IRN
IHIO – 4
Funds
(60%)
SSO – 2
Funds (33%)
AFMSIO
(3.5%)
Others (3.5%) 100%
JOR CIP (41.2%) RMS (27.2%) JUHs (1.3%)
Other
prepayment
(17.5%)
87.5%
MOR
CNOPS
(9.1%)
CNSS (24.9%) RAMED (28%)
Other
prepayment
(4-5%)
66-67%
SUD
NHIF
(28.7%)
Police and
Military
(5.6%)
Other
prepayment
(0.6%)
34.9%
12. “SHI for UHC”
Characterized by:
• Increased Social Solidarity
• (Quasi-) Independent Fund
with Autonomy
• Entitlements because of your
citizenship and not because
of your job
• Split between Financing and
Provision
12
Driving:
• Equity and Fairness
• Strategic Purchasing and
Enhanced Efficiency
• Protected Fund for Health
• Financial Sustainability
• Empowerment of the insured
13. • Covering the near poor and non-poor informal sector
– Need to identify options and pursue their implementation
• Limiting Fragmentation
– Need to structurally/functionally merge HIOs and Schemes
within HIOs
• Ensuring Autonomy and Accountability
– Need to enact necessary legislations and enforce the
regulations
• Investing in Information Technology
– Need to develop population databases and HMIS for purchasing
• Framing the Role of Private Sector
– Need to identify who is covering what and from which provider
Key Policy Issues in Designing “SHI for UHC” in EMR
14. Implementing “SHI for UHC”
• Governance – enact adequate laws and other legal provisions
• Membership Management – bring all population groups within the
fold of SHI
• Fund Management – determine needed fund and set contributions
to ensure sustainability
• Benefit Design – define benefit package and identify who pays for
what
• Provider Management – accredit providers to ensure quality, and
contract wit them using adequate payment mechanisms
• Information Management – establish HMIS, organize provider
reporting and institutionalize monitoring