This document describes a study that compared two approaches to test requirement analysis: condition-based modeling and viewpoint-based modeling using the Viewpoint-based Software Test Engineering Process (VSTeP). Two teams of test engineers analyzed requirements for testing a rice cooker manual - one team modeled test conditions while the other modeled test viewpoints and relationships. The viewpoint-based model uncovered fewer omitted test conditions. The results provide initial evidence that modeling test viewpoints may reduce omissions compared to just listing test conditions, suggesting viewpoint-based modeling supports a more thorough requirements analysis process.