This is a copy of the presentation I made to Placer County CA officials complaining about the rezoning of my property in Truckee. The whole presentation was made moot when I decided to alter my remodeling plans to stay within the new setback requirements
17. Land Use LDR and Zoning B-40 Are the Best Fit for MWE Nonconforming % Zoning 74.6 2.3 Acres* 43,560 sq. ft. B-43 74.6 0.0 1 Acre*** 10,000 sq. ft.** LDR MWE Parcels %<Min Area * Per paragraph 17.52.40 ** Minimum lot size within range determined by zoning Zoning 14.9 1 Acre* 40,000 sq. ft. B-40 RR 43,560 sq ft** 10 Acres*** Land Use Land Use *PCC ¶ 17.52.40 ** Minimum lot size within range determined by zoning *** PCC Table I-2 pg 13 to to to to Minimum Lot Area Minimize
18. In MWE (Sheets 2 & 3) the Lots Are Too Small for New Zoning Placer County took an existing developed residential area (e.g. MWE. Sheet 2) with 84% buildout and rezoned it to quintuple the number of nonconforming parcels for no apparent reason. 70.6% 24/34 26.5% 9/34 3 65.8% 25/38 13.2% 5/38 2 Nonconforming lots for New Zoning RS-B-X 1 AC MIN Nonconforming lots for Old Zoning TR-1-B-40 Sheet
19.
20. MWE Zoning Inconsistencies 1.6 Low Density Residential (LDR) Ref: MVCP pg 27 ¶ 1.6 & PCGP pg 10 This designation is applied to urban or urbanizing areas suitable for single-family residential neighborhoods, with individual homes on lots ranging in area from 10,000 square feet to one acre MWE Sheet 4 Zone District RS is inconsistent with Land Use RR MWE Sheets 2 and 3 B-X-1 AC MIN is inconsistent with land use LDR as stated in MVCP ¶ 1.6 Consistent Zoning Districts Land Use Designation or more? TABLE 1.1 Ref: MVCP pg 24, PCGP pg 14 General Rules for Determining Zoning Consistency with the Martis Valley Community Plan Rural Residential (RR) Farm (F), Residential Agricultural (RA), Residential (Sheet 4) Forest (RF), Open Space (O) Low Density Residential (LDR) Residential Agricultural (RA), Residential Single (Sheets 2 & 3) Family (RS)