Empirical-based Analytical Insights on the Position, Challenges and Potential for Promoting OERin ODeL Institutions in Africa Prof. C.K. Muganda and Dr. A.S. Samzugi Open University of Tanzania and Brenda Mallinson, OER Africa / Saide

1. Prof. C.K. MugandaProf. C.K. Muganda and Dr. A.S. Samzugi
Open University of Tanzania
and Brenda Mallinson, OER Africa / Saide
Empirical-based Analytical Insights
on the
Position, Challenges and Potential
for Promoting OER
in ODeL Institutions in Africa
2nd
International Conference of the
African Virtual University
Nairobi, Kenya. July 2-3, 2015

2. Outline
2

3. Introduction
• Rationale for the Paper:
– To share insights on the Position, Challenges and Potential for
Promoting OER in ODeL Institutions in Africa based on the
case study of OUT.
• Motivation for Study:
– Recognition of immense benefits of OER materials in
promoting wider access to education and improving the
quality of programmes offered by education institutions in
Africa.
– Using the case study of OUT to inform on the use of
experience sharing workshops as a strategy for identifying
untapped potential for developing, integration and use of
OERs in African institutions.
3

4. Objectives of the study
• Specifically, the study aimed to:
– analyse the current status of OERs at the OUT;
– share lessons learned in OER creation, development and
production; integration and use; hosting and dissemination
– discuss the rationale for an institutional OER policy
– Identify the existing potential for OER development and
use in Africa.
4

5. Methodology
• Descriptive qualitative research design
• Conducted at the Open University of Tanzania
• Participants were purposively sampled
• Methods used to collect data:
– questionnaires, focused group discussion, workshop presentations
and panel discussions
• Data gathering events:
– Focused Group Discussion
– OER Institutional Practice Analysis - workshop 1
– OER Experience Sharing – workshop 2
5

6. Findings and Discussion
• Status of OER at OUT (FGD / Workshop 1)
• OER Experiencing Sharing (Workshop 2)

7. Status of OER at OUT (FGD /Workshop 1)
• Findings
– AVU, TESSA and MIT materials are mostly used because they are
compatible with OUT programmes, but need to be better promoted
– There is a need to create awareness on OER potential
– No comprehensive policy yet to directly address OER issues
– OUT staff are willing to develop, integrate and use OERs
• Discussion
– Need for capacity building for staff in developing, integrating and using
OERs. i.e. via Professional Development
– Content experts be used to ensure quality of OERs developed and used
by OUT staff and students
– Proper citation and acknowledgement of source(s) required to abide by
intellectual property issues.
7

8. OER Experience Sharing (Workshop 2)
8
Lessons learned (a): OER Development and Production
•Basic ICT skills and competences are a prerequisite
•Institutional support required - provide time, budget and recognition of
staff effort
•A plan to guide the OER development activities is essential
•Analysis of the educational context of the target users is important.
•Collaboration at international, national and institutional levels
desirable.
•Capacity building is a necessity.
•Funding is a major aspect.
•Quality assurance aspects need to be considered and adhered to.
•Determining the appropriate creative commons (CC) license to use is
vital.

9. OER Experience Sharing (Workshop 2)
9
Discussion (a): OER Development and Production
•OER writing needs knowledge sharing, collaboration and
commitment of the team members.
•OER Development and production is a process
•Review for quality and relevance should be conducted at all
stages of development, integration and use
•Quality assurance for content and relevance is important.
•A policy/policies to guide the process is vital.

10. OER Experience Sharing (Workshop 2)
10
Lessons learned (b): OER Integration and Use
•Central aspects were again: collaboration, institutional support,
funding, capacity building, creating awareness, sensitization and
supportive policies.
•Willingness to adapt/adopt OERs (buy-in) need to be worked on
because this may mean change in pedagogical practice.
•In integrating OER in a new programme the curriculum need to be
present and clearly understood by the material developers
•Planning on how and what to adopt/adapt is a requirement
•Agreement on plans/structure/format for integration is required
•Make relevant OERs accessible to instructors and learners.

11. OER Experience Sharing (Workshop 2)
11
Discussion (b): OER Integration and Use
•There is a need to build capacity in synchronizing the curriculum
•Materials produced in Africa (e.g. AVU materials ) are used more in Asia
and Brazil than Africa – WHY?
• Mitigating factors including limitations inherent in Africa such as low
bandwidth, irregular internet connectivity, unreliable electricity supply,
poor awareness and insufficient information literacy / digital fluency.
•Need to seek a national-wide solution to inaccessibility to OERs due to
limited bandwidth, internet connectivity, and electricity.

12. OER Experience Sharing (Workshop 2)
12
Lessons learned (c): OER Hosting and Dissemination
•Some OERs are hosted on the OUT website – including MIT,
AVU, TESSA and OUT materials
•OUT Online study material portal is available and working.
•Information literacy training is continuing –During orientation
and face 2 Face (students) and Panel marking (staff)
•Low bandwidth is limiting access.

13. OER Experience Sharing (Workshop 2)
Discussion (c): Hosting and Dissemination
•OERs fall under Creative Commons licensing and are
designed to be reused.
•Acknowledgement through proper citation and observing
the CC license is vital..
•Authors, editors can be consulted for permission to use
sources.
•Plagiarism check software and citation software can
assist.
•There is a need to train staff and students to avoid unintended
plagiarism.
13

14. OER Experience Sharing (Workshop 2) (6/6)
14
Lessons learned (d): Institutional Policies: Rationale
and Possibilities
•OER related issues are mentioned in some institutional
policies such as ICT Master Plan, Study material policy, Quality
Assurance, and IP. BUT there is no comprehensive OER policy.
•At national level the Copyright and Neighbouring Rights Act,
1999 in section 35. The distance education environment is not
considered.

15. OER Experience Sharing (Workshop 2)
Discussion (d): Institutional Policies:
•There is a need for OUT to develop an OER policy.
•ODL institutions including OUT to influence amendment of
section 35 0f the Copyright and Neighbouring Rights Act, 1999.
•OUT to learn from other institutions that already have an
independent OER policy.
15

16. Recommendations (1/3)
• Institutions in Africa need to develop an OER policy to guide
procedures and operationalize OER practices
• Institutions in Africa need to organize on a regular basis
awareness and sensitization workshops on OERs production
and use.
• Institutions in Africa need to Integrate the shared experiences
into improving the OER practices.
• The institutions should be proactive in building capacity to its
staff members on production, integration and use of OERs.
• Lecturers should be encouraged to incorporate and recommend
OERs to their students.
16

17. Recommendations (2/3)
• Collaborate with other institutions within and outside Tanzania
in production, integration and use of OERs.(e.g. MOU
between OUT/SAIDE.
• OUT identity and curriculum should be considered in the
collaboration.
• Publish, publicize and market OUT OERs
• Ensure quality of OERs. Incorporate OER issues in the review
of QA policy and study materials policy.
• Develop and institutionalize a systematic work flow process
for OERs production
17

18. Recommendations (3/3)
• Strengthen theory and practice on OERs.
– Encourage and promote systematic research on the field of OERs.
– Engage with network and communities of practice on OERs eg.
GO-GN, Creative Commons etc.
• Institutions in African countries to collaborate and support each other
via MOU in the area of OERs.
• Institutions to identify statutes that limits OER practices and influence
changes
• Institutions should work to ensure consistent access to online
resources in their repository/websites.
• Publish, publicize and market OERs
• Ensure quality of OERs.
• Develop and institutionalize a systematic work-flow process for OERs
production
18

19. Concluding Remarks
• Open Education Resources can make significant contributions in enhancing
the access to quality education
• African ODeL institutions have staff who have participated in the
development, production, versioning, integration and use of OER.
• OER focussed action workshops have made a significant contribution to
understanding the current status and furthering the institutional practices of
OER at the Open University of Tanzania.
• The significance of this research and practice is that an institutional
participatory action approach such as that described can assist in identifying
such potential while taking stock of what we need to move forward.
• This approach can be extrapolated to other institutions, followed by national
and regional initiatives to provide opportunities for institutionalisation and
cross-institutional sharing of OERs.
19

20. Thank you for your attention!
Discussion
20
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported License.
Prof Cornelia Muganda
cornelia.muganda@out.ac.tz
These slides are available on SlideShare:
http://www.slideshare.net/brenda6